Motion Project does not look good in FCP

I am using FCP 5.0 and Motion2. I made a lower third title graphic in Motion. When I embed the clips back into FCP they look pixalated. They do not look as good as they did originally. Does anyone have a solution?

Hey,
Here's the result from last night. The quicktime file is good. It seems that Motion projects in FCP, even from rendered QT files, don't display their true image.
My output this morning for my project is flawless. Even though the timeline looks horrible.
The reason this seems to come up in this forum again and again, is probably that Boris 3D, FCP's titles, even LiveType, all display their true clean rendered image in FCP. Motion, however, doesn't seem to do that.
My guess is that it hangs on to a thumbnail representation for FCP of the rough draught render that motion must create so you can place your motion project in your FCP timeline live. (you know, you can switch back and forth and update a motion project and it updates it in FCP. )
It just doesn't say that anywhere that I was looking.
So, if anyone else is creating Motion projects and importing them into Final Cut, be aware that what you see in Final Cut is not what is going to render in your output. It will be full resolution and without the alising that appears in FCP's timeline.
Whew!
Gord
G5 Dual 2.3Ghz Power PC 3GB RAM, 2x120HDD, & 15" Powerbook   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

Similar Messages

  • Exported Video Does Not Look Right

    I am sure this is a basic setting I am overlooking, but a lot of this is new to me - any help would be GREATLY appreciated.
    My goal is to create a high quality 640x480 movie for Computer/Web viewing only.
    • I shot a short video using a Canon Vixia HV30 to mini DV tape using the SD standard - no problem. I guess that records at 720x480 non-square pixels at 29.97fps - is that right?
    • I used log and capture inside of FCP v6.0.5 to capture the various clips I needed - no problem (I don't think). If I open each of those clips from the finder in Quicktime they look "pretty" good, but a bit of aliasing on the diagonals and somewhat blurry, but not sure why? Everything looks sharp on the smaller camera LCD screen? and looks pretty good inside of FCP on the Canvas? If I open one of these captures directly inside of Quicktime and do a get info, it says...
    DV 720x480 (640x480)
    FPS: 29.95
    Normal Size: 640x480 pixels
    Current Size: 640x480 pixels (Actual)
    All these Quicktime movies appear slightly larger in height and width than the same clips when viewed in the FCP Canvas?
    If I open the Sequence Settings in FCP it says...
    Frame Size 720 x 480 NTSC DV (3:2)
    Pixel Aspect Ratio NTSC - CCIR 601 /DV (720x480)
    Field Dominance: None
    Editing Timebase: 29.97
    Everything looked pretty good inside FCP so I Exported a QT Movie using "Current Settings". Then opened the resulting self-contained movie in QT and it looks pretty bad. When I get info in QT on the rendered final movie it reads...
    DV 720x480 (640x480)
    FPS: 29.97
    Normal Size: 720x480 pixels
    Current Size: 640x480 pixels (Actual)
    So... the FPS and the Normal Size are not the same as the captured original clips.
    Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong?
    Is this just the wrong Sequence Settings, Export Settings or do I have to start over an re-capture all my footage some other way?
    PS - I am assuming that the DV Camcorder is recording interlaced (60 fields) rather than progressive - is that right. Do I need to de-interlace the video somehow?
    Message was edited by: ChoreoGraphics

    I'm far from being an expert, but since no one has replied to you yet, and because I've been helped out here plenty of times, I'll post something and who knows -- it may be the answer.
    Your post was really long but from what I can gather, you're wondering why your exported video does not look good when you open it in QuickTime. Try this: Open the video in QT, hit command-J, then click on Video Track, then at the bottom right (under Visual Settings) you'll see High Quality, Single Field, and Deinterlace. Click around on those to see if that improves what you see.

  • When i am editing in finalcut, my image does not look particularly good.  do i need to export it at the end in order to see it in full high definition?  thx

    when i am editing in finalcut, my image does not look particularly good.  do i need to export it at the end in order to see it in full high definition?  thx

    Open FCP X Preferences / Playback / Use Original... Media / Playback Quality...
    How does the exported movie-file looks like...?
    Regards
    Nolan

  • New iPad 2 does not look as good as old ipad?

    Just got my iPad 2 and first thing I notice is the screen does not look as good as my old iPad.  There's a difference in brightness (dimmer) but that's fine, I just increase the brightness.  However, even after adjusting to approx same level of brightness, the iPad 2 still does not look as good.  For one thing, there is a yellow cast to the iPad 2, whereas the iPad is more neutral.  Also, the iPad 2 feels like it has a haze over it.  Somehow I am very aware of looking through a screen, whereas with the iPad it's just sort of not there.  It's like there's an extra extra layer on the ipad2.  (yes I took the plastic film off, that's not it).
    Am I nuts or does anyone else feel this way?

    I googled iPad 2 yellow display and it looks like some people have a yellow spot near the edge due to the glue not sufficiently drying.  Mine is different; the whole screen is on the yellow side, so white isn't white but a bit yellow.  If I tilt  it and look at an angle, then white becomes white. 
      It is apparent you look at it side by side with an iPad 1, but maybe if I didn't have one to compare it, I wouldn't know any differently.  I don't know if this is normal for an iPad 2.
    I do notice the screen feels different.  The iPad screen feels hard, like glass.  The iPad 2 screen is softer, more like plastic, which I like, except for the yellow thing.

  • My Ref. HD does not look like my Aperture Library

    Hi,
    I don't neccessarily have a problem, but I do notice that my referenced library on an ext. HD does not look like my Aperture library on my mbp. I notice that there are alot of separate images not in albums or projects or folders. Is there a way or need to reorganize the ref. images into a similar setup as my library. Any thoughts are welcome as I'm a bit of a neat freak, esp. with photos etc.
    Thank you.
    John

    OK we're talking past each other here and not getting much accomplished.
    The top screenshot from this post Re: My Ref. HD does not look like my Aperture Library is not from within Aperture. How did you take that screenshot? Aperture does not display dates like that AFAIK, that sure looks like a Finder window.
    I believe the best thing you can do right now is to read the User Manual, especially the part about the parts of the Aperture library and Kirby's very good user tip. It should clear up your terminology and make things clearer for you.
    good luck
    regards
    To better explain my point. This is what a screenshot of an Aperture Library would look like from within Aperture
    This is a screnhsot of a Finder window
    Message was edited by: Frank Caggiano - added screenshots

  • Open Other Project - Does Not Function

    Hello -
    We are finishing a CBT lesson in Cap 3 which includes 29
    seperate projects. At the end of each project the student is
    presented a button to take them to the next project, i.e. "Open
    Other Project".
    Here lies the issue, we have set this button to "Open other
    project" and "Open URL or file". In both case the next project does
    not open. The user is taken to an internet search page. We set up
    the button "On Success" feature using the Captivate Help files
    where it instructs you to remove all of the system paths and just
    use the project or file names. Also confirmed button settings in
    Advanced Interaction.
    We are publishing our projects in .exe formats. This isuue is
    present when we preview it using the preview feature and from the
    .exe products.
    What are we doing wrong, any ideas?

    Hi again
    I just conducted a brief test using a Button object and the
    exact file names you listed. Things worked as expected on my end.
    This is actually good news, as it suggests Captivate 3 isn't to
    blame. Instead, something is wonky with your project(s).
    One thing that strikes me here is that you say you are seeing
    a Web Browser open. This suggests your button is programmed to
    "Open URL or File" and not "Open other project". You may wish to
    double check that. If you examine it and it already says "Open
    other project", you may wish to delete that button and insert a new
    one. Maybe somehow it became corrupt and is retaining the Open URL
    or File setting and not respecting the Open other project setting.
    Cheers... Rick

  • 9.3.1 Migration Utility gives "Project does not exists" error in log

    In preparation for using Hyperion Reporting and Analysis 9.3.1, I have installed the following on a Linux test server:
    --Oracle App Server 10.1.3
    --Oracle Database 10g XE
    --Hyperion shared services 9.3.1
    --Hyperion UI Services 9.3.1
    --Hyperion SQR Production Reporting 9.3.1
    --Hyperion Reporting and Analysis, Financial Reporting 9.3.1
    Everything is up and running and I created a new user account in Shared Services to administer the system, and attempted to give it full access by provisioning it with all the available roles. I received an error message stating
    "+OracleJSP: An error occurred. Consult your application/system administrator for support. Programmers should consider setting the init-param debug_mode to "true" to see the complete exception message.+"
    I'm investigating that now, but the roles seemed to be assigned to the user anyway.
    When attempting to migrate from HPSu 8.5.2 to Reporting and Analysis 9.3.1 using the 9.3.1 Linux x86 Migration Utility (V11333-01 from edelivery.oracle.com), I get the following error message in a test migration:
    The migration process has been failed on 'User Defined Roles' migration step*
    I set the log level to debug and looked it over and here are the error details:
    +\[09 16 10:49:29,080] \[ERROR ] The migration process has been failed on 'User Defined Roles' migration step+
    +\[09 16 10:49:29,081] \[ERROR ] com.hyperion.interop.lib.OperationFailedException: Project does not exists by this id '%201252935352214.11'.+
    com.hyperion.pmt.migrator.common.CommonException
    at com.hyperion.pmt.migrator.userprovision.tool.MigrationManagerImpl.doAssignDefaultGroup(MigrationManagerImpl.java:864)
    at com.hyperion.pmt.migrator.userprovision.tool.MigrationManagerImpl.startMigration(MigrationManagerImpl.java:751)
    at com.hyperion.pmt.migrator.userprovision.ui.panels.MigrationPanel$ProcessRunner.run(MigrationPanel.java:304)
    Caused by: com.hyperion.interop.lib.OperationFailedException: Project does not exists by this id '%201252935352214.11'.
    at com.hyperion.interop.lib.helper.AdminProjectHelper.getProjectNameByID(Unknown Source)
    at com.hyperion.interop.lib.CMSClient.getProjectNameByID(Unknown Source)
    at com.hyperion.pmt.migrator.userprovision.tool.MigrationManagerImpl.getDefaultGroupBundle(MigrationManagerImpl.java:824)
    at com.hyperion.pmt.migrator.userprovision.tool.MigrationManagerImpl.doAssignDefaultGroup(MigrationManagerImpl.java:861)
    +... 2 more+
    We've only one user-defined role in the source system that I don't think is giving us this issue, it is inactivated and "User Roles" was not one of the selected objects to migrate.
    I would like to try taking the role completely out of the source system if possible, preferably through SQL applied to the V8 tables or through the SDK.
    The error looks like it lies in the migration task following the user role provisioning, doAssignDefaultGroup* and is caused by getProjectNameByID*
    The steps I have taken (for sanity sake) so far are:
    --I've removed all associations with this user defined role in the source system (users, groups, and roles) using the administrative interface on the web.
    --I've unchecked 'User Defined Roles' on the list objects to migrate from the source to target systems in the Migration Utility, but I still get the error.
    It looks like it is trying to provision a user defined role in the target system, but it is not finding a default project by the id in the error message.
    Are there any Shared Services steps in the target system that need to be taken besides creating a manager type user to use as a log in for the Migration Tool?

    I turned on the jsp debug init-param for the system for more information about the error. I get the following:
    Request URI:/interop/jsp/css/CSSTemplate.jsp
    Exception:
    OracleJSP:oracle.jsp.parse.JspParseException: /jsp/css/provisionSummary.jsp: Line # 119, <bean:define id="appId" name="appName" property="key"/>
    Error: Tag attempted to define a bean which already exists: appId
    When I attempt to provision the user I created for administrative purposes, Ialso see the following:
    --from the file SharedServices_Metadata.log I see the error:
    +2009-09-18 15:55:32,399 \[AJPRequestHandler-HTTPThreadGroup-6\] ERROR com.hyperion.eie.common.cms.CMSFacade - org.apache.slide.structure.ObjectNotFoundException: No object found at /users/admin+
    --from SharedServices_Admin.log
    +2009-09-17 14:49:20,583 \[Thread-13\] ERROR com.hyperion.cas.server.CASAppRegistrationHandler.loadApplicationsFromCMS(CASAppRegistrationHandler.java:430) - AuthorizationException occured when loading applications : Refer log in debug mode for details+
    How does one set these logs into debug mode ?

  • Conversion does not look the same?

    I converted a pdf file to a word document last night and the page does not look the same. It is a weekly time log and the lines are messed up and the font is not placed correctly. Is there any way to fix this?

    Good day,
    What you described is fairly common for conversions where the PDF file that's being converted to Word wasn't originally created from Word.  The service does the best it can to interpret the font data as well as the formatting, but as that information is often not present within the code of the PDF file, sometimes the resulting Word document does not exactly resemble the PDF file.
    Kind regards,
    David
    Acrobat Community Manager
    Adobe Systems

  • Shooting "squeezed" 16:9 does not look quite right when exported to 16:9

    Hard to put a title which would cover the problem well, probably hard to describe it well, too, for an amateur:)
    Anyway, I have a cheap JVC GR-D320E which serves me well as a beginner´s camera (for the price I gave) but when I shoot in what it calls 16:9 mode which I have understood it is not true 16:9 but in a way squeezed, and I import this to FCE (set to Anamorphic PAL), it all looks good within FCE but when I export it using QT Conversions and setting the proportions and size manually to what is supposed to be the right dimensions for 16:9 PAL (1024x576 if I remember it correctly) it does not look right. The persons "grow shorter and fatter", if you know what I mean.
    I have tried to change the dimensions in QT Pro, but the problem is to find the correct ones. I also wonder why this happens and if there actually are "correct" proportions which then would be something between 16:9 and 4:3 or if I am doing something wrong?
    When I export not using QT Conversions, the result is 4:3 which isn´t right, either...
    Well, hope I have been able to describe this in a way which is possible to understand...

    I want to export it for several purposes; all you mention, in fact; to put on the web, to play on the monitor and to make a DVD. As I mentioned, when I exported as a QuickTime movie, it came out as a 4:3 and that of course, looked awful.
    Using the conversions, I can scale it as I want to, but to me 16:9 does not look exactly right, either. That is why I wanted to know if there are some proportions in between the 4:3 and 16:9 which is appropriate for footage which is not filmed in true 16:9 but in this option which cheaper cameras have.
    The article you linked to, did not tell anything new, alas.

  • Help me...does this look good?!?!?

    Hey all,
    I want a G4 to use in my music studio, have found one on ebay, does this look good to you...
    http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=8792713494&rd=1&sspagename= STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&rd=1
    If you can't access that, basically it's this...
    Computer is in excellent condition, has been well loved and well upgraded:- 200GB hard disk (5400rpm) Dual 867 MHz, 1MB L3 cache per processor 1.25GB DDR SDRAM 16x DVD+/- RW (Superdrive) 4x DVD+ RW (original Superdrive) 4x USB 2.0 ports 2x USB 1.0 ports 2x Firewire ports Airport Card (WiFi) Ethernet Card 56kbps Modem Digital in/out for audio Again it is in excellent condition, well loved.
    Oh and there is still 2 slots left for memory upgrade and 4 other slots for your other upgrades, i.e. more firewire, usb, graphics card, music adaptors etc. I used the machine mostly for video editing and graphic design and it handles everything I throw at it. It is a beast of a computer but sadly by job entails I have a laptop now I will also include all the software that comes with it.
    Think it sounds good? What price do you reckon???
    Thank you!
    Olivia x
    G4 I hope    

    If you do decide to bid I'd keep in mind that it's the base model MDD G4 with a 133MHz system bus (the others had 167MHz). It's also one of the original models that got the nickname of wind tunnel as they could be fairly noisy, so much so that Apple under went a power supply replacement program using quieter fans, which may be an issue if it's intended for audio use. I'm not sure whether it's had the power supply replaced, but Verax also offered a noise reduction kit, which may give some indication of how noisy it can be.
    I'm not trying to put you off though, but I'd keep the above in mind if you do intend to place a bid.

  • I have today purchased iMovie but does not look right

    I have today purchased iMovie for £2.99 (through iTunes I recall) but when I start the app it does not look much like the on line tutorial details. Just has Video/Projects/Theater and create a new project. Any advice please? Have I actually purchased the app or some simple equivalent?

    Thanks for your time. I have another response which has clarified my situation. I have the right app for an iPad, which is not so comprehensive as the version for a MAC. I have also found some learning material for the iPad version, which matches what I have, so all is resolved. Thanks!

  • Aperture 3 project does not display any images in one Project

    This is a strange situation.  The bullets below outline the situation:
    The project does not display any images
    When I place the pointer over the project it shows there are 500+ images
    I have located the RAW images stored in my aperture library
    I can pull up the images using a smart folder and searching for photos taken on the event day
    This is happening only to one of my projects that I know of (weird!!)
    I have tried to 're-add' the image by both importing and dragging and dropping into the project, neither works
    I tried the following basics:
    Fixed permissions
    Rebuilt the database
    Tried to re-import the data, but when I have the 'don't import duplicates' these are not an option
    Found the images in my Aperture library
    I created another project and drug all of the images into that project
    Any idea how I can fix this?
    My fear is that if I delete the original project, the original master images will be deleted.

    The most common cause of this is some sort of stuff in the search box at the top of the browser that you don't expect to be there. Just clear it and all your images should show up.
    RB
    One note - if you drug your images from one project to another it moves them vs copies them unless you hold down the option key.

  • I am using both PSE 13 and Lightroom 5.  When I use Lightroom as an external editor and save the photo, it shows up in PSE13 as an edited file but does not look any different.  Why doesn't it appear edited?

    I am using both PSE 13 and Lightroom 5.  When I use Lightroom as an external editor and save the photo, it shows up in PSE13 as an edited file but does not look any different.  Why doesn't it appear edited?

    People who have Photoshop, but don't have Lightroom, need ACR so that they can use Raw files. Without ACR they could do nothing with those (they may also like having ACR so that they can work on other kinds of image using the same kinds of adjustments and techniques, as are used with Raw files).
    People who have Lightroom, can get access to Raw files regardless whether ACR is present or not. They can use Lightroom on other kinds of image also, using the same methods. LR can pass images directly into Photoshop without passing via ACR (or else does so transparently, which amounts to substantially the same thing).
    ACR does not, strictly speaking, even need to be installed for this external editing to happen. In fact, not even PS needs to be - since a different image editor can be used instead, while still retaining the Adobe Raw conversion etc.
    Lightroom "subcontracts out" specialised external tasks, in this workflow, but is still your "main contractor": the image is otherwise located, viewed, managed, adjusted/presented and output entirely using LR.
    So IMO we can divide image processing into:
    operations that involve pixels and layers and layer masks and adjustment layers etc (of the kind done inside Photoshop)
    operations that involve parametric edits (of the kind done in ACR where you are not using a Lightroom based workflow; otherwise, done inside Lightroom)
    When PS is called in, that's because those tasks are impossible or unsuitable to do in Lightroom. But those tasks can't be done in ACR either - by definition, since LR and ACR have exactly the same image processing "feature set".
    Lightroom is irrelevant to the Bridge + ACR + PS workflow. This workflow requires both your PS and your ACR to be current enough, to support your Raw format etc.
    ACR and Bridge are irrelevant to the LR + (image editor) workflow. It is in this case, only LR which needs to be current enough to support your Raw format etc.
    RP

  • Project does not contain a valid connection problem

    I am using JDeveloper 10.1.3.2.0 and have checked out code that was in CVS. I tried to put the code under an Application and Project, but when I do the check out, the Application Navigator shows it at the Application level. Within that Application, there are two projects. When I do a Make on either project, I get the error that The Business Component Project does not contain a valid connection. Double clicking on the error send me to the corresponding .jpx file which contains this:
    <?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1' ?>
    <!DOCTYPE JboProject SYSTEM "jbo_03_01.dtd">
    <JboProject
    Name="ViewController"
    SeparateXMLFiles="true"
    PackageName="" >
    <DesignTime>
    <Attr Name="_ejbPackage" Value="false" />
    <Attr Name="_NamedConnection" Value="Fred" />
    <Attr Name="_version" Value="10.1.3.36.73" />
    <Attr Name="_jprName" Value="../ViewController.jpr" />
    </DesignTime>
    </JboProject>
    Does anyone know what connection needs to be set up? I wonder if part of the problem is how the CVS check out is working, but I can't seem to get it under an application.
    I'd appreciate any help!

    Hello.,
    Thank you so much for the responses! That was the problem. I had defined a database connection, but the name was not the same as what was in the jpx file. The error is now gone. :)
    Thanks again!

  • Why is it that I downloaded Firefox 4.0 but I do not have the orange firefox box in the upper left hand corner of screen. My screen still looks like the old verison of firefox. My screen does not look like the one in the video. looks nothing like the one

    My Firefox 4.0 does not look anything like the videos you show about the features of the new Firefox. My screen looks totally different than yours. It does not have the orange box in the upper left hand corner of the screen. My screen still looks like the old version. I have the logo on the top of my screen with Ask a Question a vertical line Firefox Help - Mozilla Firefox.
    Under this line I have File, Edit, View, History, Bookmarks, Tools, and Help. Below this line is a tab with Ask a Question Firefox Help and a +. My husbands screen looks identical to the orange Firefox Box in the upper left of screen. I would like my screen to look identical to the ones shown in your videos. I only have one version of Firefox 4.0 my husband does have the Firefox 4.0 plus the Beta version. How do I add the Beta version? I have Windows Vista running systems. Please help. Thank you

    You're welcome

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I upload folders to new Photo Library?

    i have 13,000 pictures in 600 folders on my PC and I want to convert them all to the new photo library in iCloud.  The Icloud browser app won't allow me to select folders to upload.  I have to open each folder and upload individual photos.  Then I wi

  • English to Japanese

    I have a small home base business and a Japanese business man has made contact with me, wanting to purchase some of my goods.  We have been communicating via email, but there have been problems on both side.  I know no Japanese and he knows very litt

  • Disable High definition Support in Flash player 10

    I have a slow computer so i need to disable High definition support in the Flash player 10 plugin for Firefox on the Linux operating system Lubuntu. Is there a file i need to modify that will disable Flash player 10 from supporting High definition vi

  • Four Replacement Iphone 5

    Is it normal to have to go through 4 replacement apple iphone 5, all due to hardware issues ?

  • Voice over hanging

    Hi My iPhone is hanging while I am using voice over function could you please assist to solve Fm