Movement Type 261 - Different G/L account to get debited for same Movement

Hi Friends,
I need your help to solve the following issue
We are in the process of implementing ECC 6.00. One of our client requirement is for Movement type 261 , different consumption account to get debited for different types of issues. i.e. incase of MT 261 issue for maintenance order the consumption account should hit to Maintenance G/L and incase of MT 261 issue for production order different  consumption account to get debited.
I think One way to meet this requirement is by creating new Movement type by copying MT261 and assigning new Account Grouping to that MT and assigning GL in GBB against the new account grouping.
I would like to know is there any other way to meet this requirement in SAP.
Request you earliest advise on this issue as we are in the stage of final integration test
Thanks
Deva

Dear
If the solution works fine please do let me know in detail as we have the same requirement.
Thanks and Regards
JS

Similar Messages

  • HT204053 Is it possible to have two (or more) different icloud mail accounts (not alias) under the same apple id? If not what is you best advice for all family members to have their own e-mail and still share the purchases under the same apple id. Thanks

    Is it possible to have two (or more) different icloud mail accounts (not alias) under the same apple id? If not what is you best advice for all family members to have their own e-mail and still share the purchases under the same apple id. Thanks

    mannyace wrote:
    Thanks for the response.
    So I basically won't run into any trouble? I
    There should be no issues. Its designed to work like that.  You don't change Apple IDs just because you get a new device.
    mannyace wrote:
    Thanks for the response.
    Is there any chance that the phones can fall out of sync?
    Unlikely. But nothing is impossible.   Though I don;t see how that would happen. As long as both are signed into the Same Apple ID / iCloud Account they will be N'Sync. (Bad Joke)
    mannyace wrote:
    Thanks for the response.
    If I get a message or buy an app or take a photo on the iPhone 5, how do I get those things onto the iPhone 6?
    If you buy an App, you have 2 ways to get it to the iPhone6: If Automatic Downloads is enabled in Settings->iTunes & App Store, it will automatically download to the iPhone 6 when you buy it on the 5 and vice versa if you buy it on the 6, it will download to the 5.
    Alternatively, you can simply go to the App Store App->Updates->Purchased and look for the App there and download it. Purchased Apps will not require payment again. i.e They'll be free to download to the iPhone 6 once purchased.
    SMS Messages will sync over using Continuity as long as they are on the same Wifi network. Otherwise, restoring the iPhone 5 backup to the iPhone 6 will transfer all messages received up until the backup was made onto the iPhone 6.
    Images, can be transferred either through Photo Stream
    My Photo Stream FAQ - Apple Support
    Or any Cloud service you want such as Dropbox, or One Drive.
    mannyace wrote:
    Also, something i forgot to ask initially: Should I update the iPhone 5 to iOS 8 first or does that not matter?
    If you want the Continuity features as explained above you need to update the iPhone 5 to iOS 8. Otherwise its not all that important.

  • I registered on icloud from my gmail and now when i log on icloud and type password its say your account is been blocked for security reasons.when i reset be email its just send on email but wich email i dont remember.i have @icloud email pls help

    (https://iforgot.apple.com i registered on icloud from my gmail and now when i log on icloud and type password its say your account is been blocked for security reasons.when i reset be email its just send on email but wich email i dont remember.i have @icloud email pls help

    drop the CAPS thats rude.
    iforgot.apple.com there is a link for find my apple id click here
    https://iforgot.apple.com/appleid?language=US-EN&returnURL=https://appleid.apple .com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/MyAppleId.woa&app_id=93&app_type=ext
    Peace, Clyde

  • HT201359 i just noticed that my account has been debited for equvalent of usd99.99 for an item Gizmonauts, overflowing chest of crystals, seller is backflip studios. what's this item all about. i can not remember purchasing this item.how can i get a refun

    I just noticed that my account has been debited for equivalent of usd99.99 for an item Gizmonauts, overflowing chest of crystals, the seller is backflip studios. whats this item all about? how can i get a refund?

    dougiedc wrote:
    It boggles the mind.  The Verizon store on L Street downtown Washington, D.C. cannot access my Verizon account.  They can only sell cellphones then it's up to me to contact Verizon on my own to get the hook up. I even asked "Are you Verizon employes?  Is this a vendor store or is it really a Verizon owned and operated store?"  The answer "Yes, we are Verizon employes, yes this is a Verizon owned and operated store" ...
    Yes, it indeed boggles the mind.  I'm of course referring to the fact that your post concerns Verizon Wireless products and services.  This forum is dedicated exclusively to Verizon Communications services.   As you probably know, Verizon Wireless and Verizon Communications operate as separate companies.
    If you need help for a Verizon wireless product or service, it's best to direct questions to the Verizon Wireless forums.  You can reach them by clicking on "Wireless" (either here or at the top of the page).
    Good luck and I sincerely hope you get your issue resolved.

  • I bought whatsup on 5th of june and my account has been debited for INR 60.  Today(8th june) again my account has been debited for INR 55.  I want to know the reason behind it?

    i bought whatsup on 5th of june and my account has been debited for INR 60.  Today(8th june) again my account has been debited for INR 55.  I want to know the reason behind it?

    You could go to the app store on your phone then tap on the update button bottom right then tap on purchases at the top and see what has been bought on your phone also you could goto itunes in you romputer and click on your account once itunes store has been selected from the left then click on account and enter your password and scroll down to Purchase history and click on "see all" and have a look at recent purchases

  • Same Condition type with different G/L Accounts

    Dear All,
    Our customer wants to maintain different set of G/L accounts with the same condition types in case of Service tax.
    We have three different condition types for Service taxes.
    JSV4 - Service tax
    JES4 - ECS on Service tax
    JSE5 - SECS on Service tax
    We have Two different Services
    1. R & D Services
    2. IT Services
    For these two services, service tax condition types are common but we need different G/L Accounts for different Services.
    How to achieve this?
    Regards,
    Mullairaja

    Create two tax codes in FTXP, one for R&D Service and another one for IT Services.
    Now go to OB40, select the required Transaction, say for example MWS and assign these tax codes with the required G/L Account there.
    Finally, in VK11, for tax condition type, assign these tax codes and save.
    Now do one sales cycle for each scenario and update the forum.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Different Pricing Schema in PO and PIR for same vendor and material

    Dear Experts,
    I am facing an issue related to MM.
    I have a vendor and a material under a plant, purchase Org, purchase group.
    When we are creating a Purchase Info Record (PIR), it is picking one pricing schema, while when creating PO for same vendor and material, it is picking another different pricing schema.
    As per my knowledge, pricing schema in PO is picked as per pricing schema group of Vendor and I believe same applies for PIR as well. I have only one vendor pricing schema group.
    Because of this issue, I have to manually key-in condition values in PO for all condition types even though I have maintained a purchase info record.
    Please suggest, what can be reason.
    Regards,
    Praveen

    Hi,
    Thanks for clearing my doubts.
    However, I stuck-up in another issue.
    Problem is that condition type- PB00 is linked with almost all pricing schemas.
    Hence, I can't change pricing procedure  in condition type- PB00.
    Also, I can't include all J* related condition types in RM0002 as well.
    Hence, if PB00 remains as RM0002 and I maintain my pricing procedure- ZJIMPO to all J* condition types, still I am not able to create PIR for all J* conditions. Error "Condition type J1CV is not in procedure A M RM0002".
    How to handle this issue? Please suggest.
    Thanks
    Praveen

  • Having an issue with itunes purchase, message shows "could not complete itunes store request, requested resource not found." My account has been debited for the price of the download, but I dont have the download.

    Need some help, I was downloading an album when the message "could not complete itunes store request, requested resource not found."  "Error in the itunes store please try again later." My account has been deducted for the amount of the album, but I dont have it downloaded on my computer. Please help!!! Thank you!!!

    Does the purchases show in your Purchased list?
    Downloading past purchases from the App Store, iBookstore, and iTunes Store
    Have you looked at the previous discussions listed on the right side of this page under the heading "More Like This"? Ones with a green checkmark are solved.
    Next contact iTunes by:
    Contact iTunes

  • MIRO for freight: freight clearing account not getting debited

    All SAP Gurus,
    We are doing MIRO for planned delivery cost (freight) and facing some problem in account determination.
    Actually the ideal cycle goes like this:
    The stock account is debited with the planned delivery costs at goods receipt and the system makes the offsetting posting to a freight clearing account. This posting is then cleared by an offsetting entry to the vendor account at invoice receipt.
    In our case accounting  entries are going correct at the time of GR.
    But at the time of MIRO insted of freight clearing account, stock account is again getting debited.
    Where may be the problem?
    Please help.
    Regards,

    Hi
    Check what are the debit and credit accounts for Freight transaction key in OBYC (check corresponding account key for freight condition in pricing procedure). If you maintain them correctly (generally we only maintain one GL account without specifying debit/credit in OBYC), then entry should be GR/IR freight clearing account debit at time of MIRO.
    Check the accounting entry in MIRO - the posting keys you are seeing (when you scroll to right hand side in accounting document you can see transaction).
    Thanks

  • Post freight cost to a different a GL account during 411-K for consignment PO Process

    We are planning to implement PO consignment for one of the client.
    The scenario is, client pays the freight cost to the supplier in advance upon receipt of consignment stock .When consignment stock is moved to own stock (411k), during the movement of the stock we need to create two accounting entries one for the material cost and the other for freight cost such that the freight can be adjusted with advance paid freight cost. Freight cost can be settled manually with another PO but the requirement is moving average price of the material should include the  cost of material  and freight cost .
    For an example if the material cost is $100(PB00) and freight cost is $10(FAR1 - 10%), during 411k it  should create  two entries one for material cost($100) and the other for freight cost($10) which can be adjusted manually.
    We tried by adding freight condition (FRA1) in consignment info record along with PB00 –Gross price and in this case during 411k it is summing both the prices($110) and posting to one GL account and the same settles during MRKO  but what we are looking for is how we can split this into $100 and $10 .
    I know standard SAP does not support this this during 411k.
    I want to know if there is any User exit, pricing procedure, routines, etc...  Or any other way that can be used to achieve this requirement. Appreciate more detailed answer

    Hi,
       As you know, currently the delivery cost are not supported in consignment and pipeline settlement. The system design is explained in the note: 208555 - MB11 Delivery costs for pipeline and consignment.
       If you want delivery cost in consignment, you have to go for development. There should be additional entry for delivery costs in RKWA table. I am not sure about the feasibility, but still would like to share the below points:
       For creating additional entry in the accounting document while doing MB1B / MB11, you may check the BADI AC_DOCUMENT.
       You may refer the note: 165647 - Documentation: Enhancement RMVKON00 (MM-IV) which explains some enhancements related to consignment settlement.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Return Purchase Orders- CESS ACCOUNT NOT GET Debited in MIGO

    Dear Expert,
    We are implementing Return PO procedure for Materials.
    Business scenario :
    Goods received from vendor during Material receipt Stock Account debited and GR/IR Clearing account Credited and Cess account Credited further during Invoice Posting Material Vendor is Credited with debiting GR/IR Clearing account and Cess Vendor is get Credited by debiting CESS account
    In Case of Return Purchase Order we are sending Materials back to Vendor during Goods Issue to Vendor Stock Account Credited and GR/IR Clearing account debited but Cess account get Credited insted of debited,
    Please advice what setting can be done to debit CESS Account during goods return
    Regards,

    Hi
    Thanks for reply, vendor has to pay duty to govt if vendor is not belong to factory location
    during GR for outside vendors pay duty to govt  but naw we want to return materials to vendor at this time we also want to recover duty paid to govt.
    to make this possible we have Created vendor code for Govt creditor and condition is created with feature of delivery cost
    goods are return to vendor by creating Return PO ( as no reference document available ) and goods issue with movment type 161.
    Pls advice

  • Different output observed in IE8 and IE11 for same HTML file

    when I open the below html code in ie8 and ie11 the output is different.
    <div style=" color: EAE6F1; " id="Screen147">
    <img style=" width: 1280; height: 1020; " id="item1" src="Desert.jpg" border="0"/>
    <div style=" background-color: FFFFFF; color: 000000; font-family: 'Arial'; font-size: 31px; layout-grid: both fixed 51px 32px; white-space: nowrap; " id="item2">
    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
    </div>
    <div style=" background-color: FFFFFF; color: 000000; font-family: 'Arial'; font-size: 31px; layout-grid: both fixed 51px 32px; white-space: nowrap; " id="item3">
    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
    </div>
    <div style=" background-color: FFFFFF; color: 000000; font-family: 'Arial'; font-size: 31px; layout-grid: both fixed 51px 32px; white-space: nowrap; " id="item4">
    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
    </div>
    I want to display a white block in the image. but when run in IE8 the white block appears bigger as compared to when displayed in IE11. 
    I wanted to know why is this behaviour and if the code is same then the output should also be the same. can anyone help me to understand this behaviour?
    thank you very much in advance for your replies.

    Hi yashajmera,
    Same script gets different results ,just as Greg said this may be related to the different rendering pages methods between different Internet Explorer versions.
    Here is a link for reference :
    Specifying legacy document modes
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj676915(v=vs.85).aspx
    We also can try to choose different view mode by F12 tool to have a check .
    To get more detailed information ,it is recommended to look for help from our MSDN forum for help.
     https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/ie/en-US/home?forum=iewebdevelopment
    Best regards
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • GL account not getting picked for ECESS

    Hi,
    I have configured CIN. When i am doing migo system is showing ECESS in pricing but when accounting entry is being generated it is without ECESS. Please suggest what configuration may have missed.
    Thanks

    Dear Robert,
    The Transaction event key "CES" will not be available in standard.... It may be created by own in your client place....
    May be VS8 we can use......
    Regards,
    Mohan.

  • Mm:can we assign movement type to different g/l acc.

    dear gurus.
    please help me out.
    can we assign movement type to different g/l acc.
    if yes how?
    thanks
    piyush singh

    Its depends , if the valuation class, plant is different, yes you can define diff G/L acc, but if all criteria in the same, then you can copy the mov,type and then define your own account modification then assign the diff G/L acc in OBYC.
    Please also check this link:
    Movement Type 261 - Different G/L account to get debited for same Movement

  • Control G/L account and Cost Center for movement type 251

    Dear Friends,
    I would like to use mov. type 251 for GI for sale and like to control over G/L account and Cost center.
    The G/L account is by default from the valuation class of the the material and if the user will enter wrong G/L
    we had done the customising in OMJJ movement type 251 - Account grouping - Unchecked the check box of column
    "Check account assignment" - Impact is " the system always uses the G/L accounts or account assignments determined automatically"
    I also made default cost center for G/L account and plant wise through OKB9.
    Now I would like to suppress/dispaly the G/L account and cost center - for same I had done Setting in Entry control menu of OMJJ for 251 of field Account control - Value  - "-" field is suppressed. But it is not working.
    Please advise to solve this situation.
    Thanks & Regards
    Rajan

    Dear Rajan
    Yes, I have checked in MB1A earlier. We have separate node for Field seletion layout for Enjoy transaction MIGO for mvt type in which the G/L account (KONTO) an Cost center (KOSTL) have only optional or required entry selection.
    warm regards
    Ramakrishna.

Maybe you are looking for