Movement Type 309 Not posting to the correct Cost Center

Hi,
We have changed the field status group for movement type 309 to be able to enter profit center. We maintained a cost center determination in OKB9 based on the profit center. However the system is ignoring the profit center entered in the MIGO (309) and picking the profit center from the material master.
Material Master has Profit center 40000.
MIGO posting has Profit Center 43005 which in turn has a cost center assigned to 100143005 cost center.
When we do MIGO 309, with the profit center 43005, the accounting document is posted with profit center 40000 and cost center 100140000. Can anyone tell why is it ignoring the profit center maintained in the transaction?
I also checked OMJJ and checked the "Account Assignment" box for transaction type AUM.
Thanks and Regards
Madhu Vutukuri

HI,
check SAPNET note 105024.
Best regards, Christian

Similar Messages

  • Change the behavior for movement type 309 - Account post PRD

    Dear friends ,
    We need to transfer material to material using movement type 309.
    These material are using price control "S".
    When we transfer from material A to material B the price difference stay stopped in the PRD account.
    We need to revaluate the material B automatically and not let the price difference stopped in the PRD... when we run the Material Costs..via Material ledger.
    Does anyone knows a way to change this behavior ?
    best regards,
    Alessandro

    Dear Revi thanks for your answer !
    One more thing...
    We cannot change the valuation from S to V in the material B.
    Regarding the PRD postings... when the Controlling team runs the Material Ledger the price for material B should be changed/updated automatically, Am I right ?
    And then the PRD account must be cleared...
    Or I continue to do the MR22 manuall...or better... create an Abap program to run automatically clearing the PRD posting agains't the material via MR22 to correct the cost of this material.
    thanks once more.
    Ale

  • Assets: Unable to post to the assigned Cost Center in Asset Master

    When I do the Depreciation Run, the cost center that gets hit is the Cost Center specified on the Cost Element (associated with the Depreciation Expenses account).
    Never does the Cost Center specified on the Asset Master gets picked.
    In case I do not specify any Cost Center (Default) on the Cost Element, no depreciation documents gets posted and instead I get an error message ‘ Missing CO assignment’
    As I understand, the Cost Center mentioned on the Asset Master should be posted to (which is not happening in my case).
    Any missing configurations in Asset Accounting or something not configured correctly in CO????

    hi,
    1) check the time interval of cost-centre
    a) AS02 with your asset
    b) KS02 with your cost centre
    A.

  • Posting with MM Movement Type 309 material to material: Error in WM

    Hello,
    i post an MM-Movement type (Bewegungsart) 309 (material to material).
    The MM-goods movement works, but then in warehouse mangagement there is a problem:
    The creation of the transfer order (Transportauftrag) stops in many cases.
    The aim is to post Material A to the same storage bin in Warehouse Management where Material B was before.
    I programmed this in user-exit (ZXLToU03) that by movement type 309, always taking same storage bin. But then I often get the error: transfer order could not be created. Then I have to do the creation of tranfer order in foreground and then I get an error like this:
    capacity of the bin location is not enough.
    The Problem is that I do a posting for example:
    001 010101                   to     922 Umbuchungzone    -->  Transfer order Pos 1
    922 Umbuchungszone  to    001 010101                    --> Transfer order Pos 2.
    And so the first transfer order position is not confirmed when I do the transfer order Pos 2.
    How can I confirm Pos 1 by batch-input? The Programm to do 309 should posting 1000 materials in one step. But in Warehouse management I get those problems?
    Is it possible to increase the capacitiy of the storage bin and then decrease it after creation of transfer order(where can I do this and when)???
    I hope anybody can help me.
    Thanks.

    Hello Kevin,
    I donu2019t think it is necessary to use a user exit to keep the Material B (that is transferred from Material A) in the same bin.
    This can be controlled in the customizing: indicator Post to same bin, that can be set in the WM Movement type (V_T333-KZUAP) and in the Storage type (V_T3010-KZUAP).
    Now I donu2019t know your business process but I am surprised that Material B requires more space than Material A since it is u2018bornu2019 by means of a transfer posting and not a production or packing step that makes it bigger in terms of capacity required.
    A workaround for this could be to transfer (LT10) Material A first to a separate Storage type (with the Post to same bin-flag set) that has no Capacity check and after the 309 posting transfer it back into the warehouse with LT10.
    Success and thanks beforehand for any credits!
    Kind regards,
    Bart

  • Transfer posting mov type 309

    Dear friends,
    Please help me in following scenario,
    In MIGO, I want to do transfer posting from one material to another .using mov. type 309.
    My problem is that, my destination material batch number is comming same as sender material batch number. I want system to automatically create new internal batch number for destination material.
    Please guide.
    Regards,
    Amit Shirsath

    Dear Madam,
    I have done the same using MB11, but i am not able to do the same with MIGO, and my clients requirement is to do with MIGO only..
    Regards,
    Amit Shirsath

  • Movement Type:309

    Hello Experts,
    I m developind i report, in which i m calculating closing balance , for which i m incorporating '309'' movement type foe which i need to add in material & subtract from another material
    One main internal table is there in which all material number is there. How can I incorporate this movement type.
    Plz help.
    Ravi

    Hello,
    Before you go in for your development, please check if standard report provided by SAP meets your requirements.
    To calculate closing balance only 309 movement type is not sufficient. You need to take care of all the movement types ( Goods Receipts done with different  movement type, Good Issues, Adjustments etc) which are carried out in your company to arrive at correct closing balance for each material. Please speak to your functional consultants to get correct requirements. This will reduce your development time.
    Regards,
    Sunil

  • Error in Standard SAP movement type 309?

    Path: SPRO > Logistic execution > Warehouse Management > Interfaces > Inventory Management > Define
    Movement type > Assign WM Movement Type References to IM Movement Types
    IM Movement type 309 has as Reference Movement types WM 301, 302 and 309.
    IM Movement type 311 has as Reference Movement types WM 311, 312 and 309.
    Path: SPRO > Logistic execution > Warehouse Management > Interfaces > Inventory Management > Define
    Movement type > LE-WM Interface to Inventory Management
    Reference Movement type 301 has WM Movement type 301.
    Reference Movement type 302 has WM Movement type 302.
    Reference Movement type 309 has WM Movement type 309.
    Reference Movement type 311 has WM Movement type 311.
    Reference Movement type 312 have WM Movement type 312.
    Path: SPRO > Logistic execution > Warehouse Management > Activities > Transfers > Define Movement
    types
    WM Movement type 301 has Destination Storage type 920.
    WM Movement type 302 has Source Storage type 920.
    WM Movement type 309 has Source and Destination Storage type 922.
    WM Movement type 311 has Destination Storage type 9210.
    WM Movement type 312 has Source Storage type 921.
    In my opinion this means that if I make an IM movement with movement 309 the material will be picked from a Storage
    bin and moved to Storage type 920. After the change the material will be brought back from Storage type 920 to the same Storage bin.
    The change will be done with WM Movement type 309 in Storage type 922.
    This creates negative stock in both Storage type 920 and 922.
    In my opinion this means that if I make an IM movement with movement 311 the material will be picked from a Storage
    bin and moved to Storage type 921. After the change the material will be brought back from Storage type 921 to the same Storage bin.
    The change will be done with WM Movement type 309 in Storage type 922.
    This creates negative stock in both Storage type 920 and 922.
    Is this an error in SAP standard? Should I Change the Source and Destination Storage types of Movement types 301,302,311 and 312 to 922?

    Hi,
    Please check wheather the material type of the material belongs to NLAG/UNBW or any other type which will not have qty/value updations for that plant at Attributes of the material type at SPROlOGISTICS GeneralMaterial mastermaterila types
    Or take the question  mark which is there on the error screen so that the information will become self explanatory.
    Please reply back with your info.

  • GL A/C for movement type 309

    How to find GL account (tcode..) for movement type 309

    The way to check the G/L accounts getting hit is to check the material document's FI document. To look for this document, use TCode MB51 with search selection as movement type 309 and execute, it will bring up all material documents created with this movement, double click on any material document No. will take you to display material document, there in header under DOC INFO tab, you will see FI document button click on that, and you can see the G/Ls and the accounting entry getting generated for the said movement.
    Sometimes you will not see any FI document generated for movement 309. The reason is when doing variant adjustment of same price, no accounting document is generated as the prices are same. If the prices are different accounting document is generated.
    Edited by: Afshad Irani on Apr 14, 2010 5:16 PM

  • Movement types data not capturing from BW cube data load

    Dear Experts,
    We are supporting BPC 10.0 Netweaver consolidation activities.
    As a part of the monthly consolidation, we are loading the ECC data available in the BW cubes into BPC.
    0FIGL_C10 cube: From this standard cube we are capturing the movement types (i.e, transaction type details) for the balance sheet items. So opening minus closing should be equal to the movement types.
    ZFIGl_CA10  : From this cube the YTD closing balances of the balance sheet items are captured.
    Opening balances are copied from the last period of the previous year through balance carry forward.
    For a balance sheet itens, we are getting the F99 closing balances correctly captures.
    But, the movement types are not getting captured correctly and the difference between the (opening + movements) - closing is sitting the controls.
    I have tried to check ECC data for these accounts in FS10N and 0FIGL_C10. The monthly data is all flowing properly. But when coming into BPC movement type alone has the problem.
    The transformation and conversion has all worked fine time June 2014 but July 2014 it has incorrect figures.
    No modifications are done for both the file.
    Please find the below attached screen shot and kindly help me on the same.
    Regards,
    Shilpa

    Hi Shilpa,
    I had the same problem in mi last consolidation implementation and the solution in this case was
    implement all the data flow for the 0FI_GL_014,
    Regards,
    Mario

  • Problem on mb1b with Movement type 309

    when I use the t-code mb1b to transfer posting with Movement type 309,the system give a hint 'Account 40000000 requires an assignment to a CO object'. I checked the configuration of omwb and obyc.It seems no problem.
    So can anyone tell me how to solve the problem? Thanks!

    Hi
    Alternative to the above solution will tell u which should work,it seems from the error that you need to put the Cost Center or G/L account. But if you don't want
    the system to ask you everytime you do the goods transfer, you have to setup
    your Cost Element / CO object. Go to transaction KA02 and put the
    appropriate CO or Cost Element (when the system gave you the warning,
    normally it gives you the CO object that need account assignment) and
    assign the Default Acc.Assigment to the CO/Cost Element.
    But before you do that, I suggest you to contact your FICO people.
    Good luck
    Regards,
    Susi

  • Material to Material Transfer using Movement Type 309

    Hi,
    We have activated the material ledger.
    Issues:
    When we transfer material A to Material B using Movement Type 309 the price difference from Material A was not allocated to Material B after executing CKMLCP.
    But the another company who using the materail to material transfer, the price difference was allocated to receiving material.

    Hi,
    Please check SAP Note 167722 to able to do multi-level price determination for material transfer with using modification.
    best regards, Takashi

  • Use Movement Type 632 to post to returns

    Hi all,
    I have configured SD Customer Consignment for my client. When consignment goods come back from the customer Movement Type 632 is used en the goods are posted in unrestricted use. My client want these goods to be posted in the Returns stock. Does anyone know if this is possible?
    Movement type 651 posts to the Returns stock. Where is teh actual setting made that this movement type posts to Return stock. Can anyone explain to me how this works.
    Thanks in advance.
    regards,
    Roel

    Hi
    It is not possible to see where those are configured for movement type 651 As some control indicators do not only depend on the movoment type, but also on other parameters (for example, debit/credit indicator, special stock indicator, indicator for updating quantities and values), you may find several entries for a movement type for certain views. These entries are necessary to cover all possible data constellations in the system.
    Why don't you use 651 for your requirement?. You can receive it in your own stock then later also you can put it in customer returns. Check 451 and 452.
    Regards
    Antony

  • Restriction to use mov type 309

    Hi,
    I need to restrict  some of users not to use mov type 309 only, other mov type they need to use, in that case how to do ??
    I knew the object (object name -authorization object is M_MSEG_BWA)  pls tell me the steps?

    Dear Jayakumar,
    While creating the roles using T Code PFCG,after adding the T code MB1B under any role,ask your Basis consultant to look for
    this authorization object M_MSEG_BWA,and dont include the check box for 309 movement and include it for the other
    movement's like 311,312 etc.
    So whatever role that's allowing MB1B should be checked so that it 's not having the authorization for 309 movement.
    Check and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • I have tried to view videos created in premiere elements 10 and I get the following message: "this file type is not supported, or the required codec is  not installed.  When it opens there is a red screen in the monitor panel with Korean writing which als

    I have tried to view videos created in premiere elements 10 and I get the following message: "this file type is not supported, or the required codec is  not installed.  When it opens there is a red screen in the monitor panel with Korean writing which also appears in the place of each clip in the video.  I tried uninstalling and reinstalling premiere elements 10, but that did not have any effect on the video.  Do you have any suggestions?  I researched codec, but do not understand them at all.

    gloucester
    In case you did not find it, the following is a copy/paste of the Announcement on Premiere Elements 19/NVIDIA GeForce
    that appears at the top of this forum.
    Premiere Elements 10 NVIDIA Video Card Driver Roll Back
    If you are a Premiere Elements 10 user whose Windows computer uses a NVIDIA GeForce video card and you are experiencing
    Premiere Elements 10 display and/or unexplained program behavior, then your first line of troubleshooting needs to be rolling
    back the video card driver version instead of assuring that it is up to date.
    Since October 2013 to the present, there have been a growing number of reports about display and unexplained workflow
    glitches specific to the Premiere Elements 10 user whose Windows computer has a NVIDIA GeForce video card. If this applies
    to you, then the “user to user” remedy is to roll back the NVIDIA GeForce video card driver as far as is necessary to get rid of
    the problems. The typical driver roll back has gone back as far as March – July 2013 in order to get a working Premiere
    Elements 10. Neither NVIDIA nor Adobe has taken any corrective action in this regard to date, and none is expected moving forward.
    Since October 2013, the following thread has tried to keep up with the Premiere Elements 10 NVIDIA reports
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1317675
    Older NVIDIA GeForce drivers can be found
    http://www.nvidia.com/Download/Find.aspx?lang=en-us
    A February 2014 overview of the situation as well as how to use the older NVIDIA GeForce drivers for the driver roll back can be found
    http://atr935.blogspot.com/2014/02/pe10-nvidia-video-card-roll-back.html
    ATR

  • GL account for movement type 309

    How to find GL account for movement type 309. Tcode etc
    Stop Cross-Posting

    Hi,
    Try using transaction code OMWB (press cancel on pop-up) >
    Press "Simulation" button and enter plant + mat + movement type >
    Press "Account assignments" button
    Dr/Cr G/L accounts displayed for posting lines.
    Kind regards,
    Robert

Maybe you are looking for