MPLS TE equal or unequal load balancing doesn't work? - step2
Previous question in thread:
Dear Sir!
I've two MPLS TE tunnels from one PE to another PE.
And there are traffic share count between them
(as tunnel mpls traffic-eng load-share command define).
But in real life all traffic from the same source to the same destination go through only one tunnel
(as CEF define - i.e. how sh ip cef exact-route says).
PEs are 3660 platforms with c3660-jk9o3s-mz.123-8.T
installed.
How can I correct this problem?
But this answer does not solved my issue:
hritter - Network Consulting Engineer, CISCO SYSTEMS, CCIE
Aug 4, 2004, 7:20am PST
This is expected behavior since CEF is used at the head end to perform label imposition. I wouldn't recommend changing the default bahavior to per=packet loadsharing since this could lead to of of sequence packets, which could lower the overall performance.
Hope this helps,
so my secound question:
Dear Sir!
I'm agree with you as MPLS TE tunnels are opened from PE to PE, so CEF does it work.
But if I open this tunnels from P to PE, ONLY ONE of this tunnels are used instead of load-sharing, if traffic go from one source (of site1 of VPN1) to the same destination (located at site2 of VPN1).
Why? Packet through P-devices swithes by labels, so I mean that CEF cannot does src-dst load sharing?
My problem are that I must to do load sharing between this two tunnels in the case above.
Q: How can I solve this problem?
Best regards,
Maxim Denisov
The per session load-balancing is also used by MPLS when multiple paths are available. Changing this behavior to per-packet is still not recommended.
Hope this helps,
Similar Messages
-
MPLS TE equal or unequal load balancing doesn't work?
Dear Sir!
I've two MPLS TE tunnels from one PE to another PE.
And there are traffic share count between them
(as tunnel mpls traffic-eng load-share command define).
But in real life all traffic from the same source to the same destination go through only one tunnel
(as CEF define - i.e. how sh ip cef exact-route says).
PEs are 3660 platforms with c3660-jk9o3s-mz.123-8.T
installed.
How can I correct this problem?
Best regards,
Maxim DenisovDear Sir!
I'm agree with you as MPLS TE tunnels are opened from PE to PE, so CEF does it work.
But if I open this tunnels from P to PE, ONLY ONE of this tunnels are used instead of load-sharing, if traffic go from one source (of site1 of VPN1) to the same destination (located at site2 of VPN1).
Why? Packet through P-devices swithes by labels, so I mean that CEF cannot does src-dst load sharing?
My problem are that I must to do load sharing between this two tunnels in the case above.
Q: How can I solve this problem?
Best regards,
Maxim Denisov -
RFC Sender (XI 3.0, SP14) Load Balancing doesn't work
Hi all,
We're "desperately" trying to use the Load Balancing option of RFC Sender Adapter (XI 3.0, SP14). It doesn't work.
The Adapter can not register to the sender SAP server. But when we do not use the "Load Balancing" option, everything works well.
We did follow the XI guidelines step-by-step. All necessary configurations in XI and in SAP sender system (TA: SM59) are "properly" done and reviewed by different experts several times.
Do you have, by chance any running scenario using "Load Balancing" within a RFC Adapter? If yes, I would appreciate if you can share it with me.
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
KhaledHello Khaled,
the RFC sender adapter registers a program at the SAP Gateway. Load Balancing for the Sender Adapter means, that you have at least two J2EE server nodes within your XI installation. On all these server nodes the same RFC sender adapter is started and register the same program at the same gateway. The load balancing is then handled by the gateway. That means, that for the sender adapter the settings are the same, even if you use load balancing or not.
The settings are, e.g.
- SID=ABC
- hostname=abchost (central instance, message server)
- hostname=xyzhost (additional dialog instance of ABC)
- instance nr=00
application server (gateway): xi1host
application server service (gw-service): sapgw00
programm id: could be freely choosen
The Metadata Repository could be connected using load balancing. Here a user need to log on to the system.
The settings here must be:
Message-Server: abchost
Message-Server-Service: sapmsABC
System-ID: ABC
Logon-Group: e.g. PUBLIC; this logon group need to be created in system ABC using transaction SMLG
For the RFC-Receiver Adapter the same settings as for the Metadata could be used.
Keep in mind, that for the RFC Sender Adapter a RFC connection of type T must be created in transaction SM59 in system ABC.
Rgds.,
Andreas -
I'm using iAS 9.0.2.2.1
I need to establish 2 form servers for Load Balancing.
I have done all the things written in the document,
but it seem doesn't work !
I need extra information for establishing Load balancing
in form server , is there anyone could help me !
Thanx in advance
Kamran BakhshandehHi,
the server version you give is Oracle9iAS Release 2, but the Forms release is Forms 6i as is in Oracle9iAS Release 1 (9.0.1.x). Actually these wont work together. Also, the Forms 6i metrics server used for loadbalancing does not work with Servlets but the Forms listener. Loadbalancing with Forms6i is documented in the Whitepaper for patch 10 (http://otn.oracle.com/products/forms/pdf/p10listenerservlet.pdf).
The load balancing in Oracle9iAS Release 2 Forms Services is done with mod_oc4j.
Frank -
Round-robin Load balancing doesn't work after one instance reboot
Hi,
We have two weblogic instances in a cluster. All Http requests are routed through the plug-in for load-balancing(round-robin). One instance in a cluster is shutdown for production maintenance. Now all requests are being forwarded to the second instance. When the first instance is started, only the new users are forwarded to the first instance. The requests from users already logged in are not forwarded to the first instance. Due to this the second instance is over-loaded.
How to prevent this and make weblogic to distribute the load even after the server restart? This is a production problem and I highly appreciate your responses.
Thanks,
Prasad Dantuluriit worked when I removed the value entered in the "Unicast Broadcast Channel" and restarted the cluster. Don't know what is supposed to go in that field but hey.
-
Unequal Load Balance on Etherchannel (L2/SW3400ME)
Hi, i have a problem with my L2 port-channel between 2 SW ME-3400-24TS-D (12.2(44)SE5), there is a unequal load balance and i don't know how to fixed. Should I change the load balance method?.
All four ports have the same config, except one (int fa0/1 on SW_2) that have this commands:
MAMANIVLN1P1IRA1#SH RUN INT FA0/1 | INC hold
hold-queue 4096 in
hold-queue 4096 out
Should i change this hold-queue config?
Here more outputs where you can see the diference, one link has 2mb and the other link has 60mb,, that's a big diference, i would like to know how to solve this:
SW_1#sh int fa0/9 | inc (Desc|rate)
Description: !!!!!! HACIA SW_2 !!!!!
Queueing strategy: fifo
5 minute input rate 2088000 bits/sec, 2065 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 25000 bits/sec, 46 packets/sec
SW_1#sh int fa0/10 | inc (Desc|rate)
Description: PORTCHANNEL10 HACIA SW_2
Queueing strategy: fifo
5 minute input rate 1905000 bits/sec, 1948 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 63348000 bits/sec, 6095 packets/sec
SW_2#sh int fa0/1 | inc (Desc|rate)
Description: Hacia SW_1_Fa0/9
Queueing strategy: fifo
30 second input rate 27000 bits/sec, 48 packets/sec
30 second output rate 2385000 bits/sec, 1996 packets/sec
SW_2#sh int fa0/2 | inc (Desc|rate)
Description: PORTCHANNEL10 HACIA SW_1
Queueing strategy: fifo
5 minute input rate 63567000 bits/sec, 6114 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 1935000 bits/sec, 1976 packets/sec
more outputs...
SW_1#sh etherchannel load-balance
EtherChannel Load-Balancing Configuration:
src-mac
EtherChannel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
Non-IP: Source MAC address
IPv4: Source MAC address
SW_2#sh etherchannel load-balance
EtherChannel Load-Balancing Configuration:
src-mac
EtherChannel Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
Non-IP: Source MAC address
IPv4: Source MAC address
SW_1#SH MAC ADDress-table INTerface po10 | inc Total
Total Mac Addresses for this criterion: 297
SW_2#SH MAC ADDress-table INTerface po10 | inc Total
Total Mac Addresses for this criterion: 66
In advance thanks for the help.Normally it will fairly well balance the traffic . There is no way to make sure each channel is exactly the same utilization wise . You can look at how it is load balanced and make a change from say mac to ip address if it looks like you aren't getting the balance you want . It would be very rare that you are going to fill one port on the channel without filling the rest almost the same .Exceptions would be if you most of your traffic is headed to one place like a certain server , even then if you used ip addresses in both directions as the load balance I think it would balance out pretty good. If it got to that point where one link was almost filled you would have to think about adding another port to the channel . This is a real good page http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094714.shtml
-
Oracle Applications 11i Load Balancing does not work with RAC one Node
Hi all,
Could you help me to resolve this issue.
Architecture environment is :
- One APPS tier node
- Two nodes Oracle Database Appliance (Primary node 1 holds INSTANCE_1 et Secondary node is configurured to holds INSTANCE_2), i.e RAC one Node.
- The primary node have instance_name SIGM_1 and the secondary node have instance_name SIGM_2, but in RAC one node, the secondary instance is not alive.
We convert our EBS 11i environment to RAC following note ID Using Oracle 11g Release 2 Real Application Clusters with Oracle E-Business Suite Release 11i [ID 823586.1].
When testing Database failover, Oracle Applications 11i load balancing does not work anymore.
The root cause is that, when the primary node of the Rac one node is down, the INSTANCE_NAME_1 is automaically relocating to the surviving node,.
During test failover, we imagine that when the primary node goes down, the secondary node start or relocate database with instance_name SIGM_2, and in that case the Oracle Applications load balancing works.
Currently, when the primary node goes down, the instance_name SIGM_1 is relocated on the secondary node, which cause failure of Oracle Applications Load Balancing.
Thank you for your advice.
MoussaThis is something I observed a long time ago for Safari (ie: around version 1). I'm not sure this is Safari, per se, but OpenSSL that is responsible for the behavior. I'm pretty sure Chrome does this and I've seen some Linux browsers do it.
What I have done at the last two companies I've worked for is recommend that our clients do not use SSL SessionID as the way of tracking sticky sessions on web servers, but instead using IP address. This works in nearly all cases and has few downsides. The other solution is to use some sort of session sharing on your web servers to mitigate the issue (which also means that your web servers aren't a point of failure for your users' sessions). (One of the products I supported had no session information stored on the web servers, so we could safely round-robin requests, the other product could be implemented with a Session State Server... but in most cases we just used IP address to load balance with). The other solution is to configure your load balancer to terminate the SSL tunnel. You get some other benefits from this, such as allowing your load balancer to reduce the number of actual connections to the web servers. I've seen many devices setup this way.
One thing to consider through this is that - due to the way internet standards work - this really can't be termed a bug on anyone's part. There is no guarantee in the SSL/TLS standards that a client will return the same SSL Session ID for each request and there is not requirement that subsequent requests will even use the same tunnel. Remember, HTTP is a stateless protocol. Each request is considered a new request by the web server and everything else is just trickery to try and get it to work the way you want. You can be annoyed at Safari's behavior, but it's been this way for over 5 years by my count, so I don't expect it to change. -
Why does the store app keeps loading and doesn't work ?
why does the store app keeps loading and doesn't work ?
Hi Peter,
In order to analyze your issue better, we need more detailed information.
Did you mean when you launch the Windows store app, the app can't start? Was there any prompt message or error code? Did this issue occur on all Windows Store app or specific one?
Try the method in this blog:
Fix Store App in Windows 8.1
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/notime/archive/2013/10/18/fix-store-app-in-windows-8-1.aspx
Karen Hu
TechNet Community Support -
I cant login on any of my Apple ID I know there correct but whenever it loads it doesn't work it goes back to sign in when I try it on my setting it is the same thing
Hi go to itunes bottom of page delete Apple ID then try & sign back in . Cheers Brian
-
Unequal Load Balancing with EIGRP over 4 Wireless networks
We are trying to load-balance on 4 interfaces that have unequal bandwidths. The setup looks like this
8 Computers -> Empty Config Switch -> 3560 Router\Switch -> 4x Wireless Radios on different frequencies - networks -> 3560 Router\Switch->Empty Config Switch -> 8 Computers
We have EIGRP setup and the bandwidths defined, and the routes are showing proper share counts, but once we start adding traffic to the network, they all jump on one of the links. The config and everything looks right, its just not working. I have tried switching to different cef algorithms. Removed the vlans . I made them equal cost and they did the same thing. Its like EIGRP does not want to load balance.
When i did this config with static routes or as OSPF, it actually load balanced them, but I'm stuck with a 1:1 share ratio. If i could control the ratio, then that would be an acceptable solution.
Any ideas on what could be causing this?
Code:
Routing entry for 192.168.104.0/24
Known via "eigrp 10", distance 90, metric 13312, type internal
Redistributing via eigrp 10
Last update from 192.168.2.4 on Vlan2, 00:04:25 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 192.168.9.4, from 192.168.9.4, 00:04:25 ago, via Vlan9
Route metric is 51712, traffic share count is 31
Total delay is 20 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 50000 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1
192.168.5.4, from 192.168.5.4, 00:04:25 ago, via Vlan5
Route metric is 13312, traffic share count is 120
Total delay is 20 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 200000 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1
192.168.3.4, from 192.168.3.4, 00:04:25 ago, via Vlan3
Route metric is 26112, traffic share count is 61
Total delay is 20 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 100000 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1
192.168.2.4, from 192.168.2.4, 00:04:25 ago, via Vlan2
Route metric is 13312, traffic share count is 120
Total delay is 20 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 200000 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1
3560_Switch_1#show int Fa 0/1 | inc packets/sec
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
3560_Switch_1#show int Fa 0/2 | inc packets/sec
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
3560_Switch_1#show int Fa 0/3 | inc packets/sec
5 minute input rate 17111000 bits/sec, 2545 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 13872000 bits/sec, 2251 packets/sec
3560_Switch_1#show int Fa 0/4 | inc packets/sec
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
3560_Switch_1#show ip cef exact-route 192.168.101.57 192.168.104.57
192.168.101.57 -> 192.168.104.57 => IP adj out of Vlan5, addr 192.168.5.4
Here is the config.
Code:
ip cef load-sharing algorithm universal 00123456
interface FastEthernet0/1
switchport access vlan 2
bandwidth 200000
delay 1
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet0/2
switchport access vlan 3
bandwidth 200000
delay 1
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet0/3
switchport access vlan 5
bandwidth 200000
delay 1
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet0/4
switchport access vlan 9
bandwidth 200000
delay 1
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description USER PORT
switchport access vlan 100
spanning-tree portfast
interface Vlan2
bandwidth 200000
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
delay 1
interface Vlan3
bandwidth 100000
ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0
delay 1
interface Vlan5
bandwidth 200000
ip address 192.168.5.1 255.255.255.0
delay 1
interface Vlan9
bandwidth 50000
ip address 192.168.9.1 255.255.255.0
delay 1
interface Vlan100
description User Data
ip address 192.168.101.1 255.255.255.0
router eigrp 10
maximum-paths 8
variance 15
network 192.168.2.0
network 192.168.3.0
network 192.168.5.0
network 192.168.9.0
network 192.168.101.0Yup, that was the first cef algorithm I had tried. ip cef load-sharing algorithm include-ports source destination
I tried all of the different types.
Also, I was sending data trough iperf from 4 computers + 1 comp steaming video on one network to 5 computers on another network. In any case of source or destination, it should have switched over. The odds of it all going on Vlan 5 is ~ 0.6% Restarting the router sometimes places it all on a different vlan, but in any case its all or nothing. -
Dual ISP connection unequal load balancing
Hi All,
I an issue regarding load balancing between to ISP. I have done policy based routing as stated in other cisco discussions .
I have 2 /30 as my test ISP and isp ip configured on other switch while i have my customer configs on my end. I can ping the two test ISP from my router but not with PC's in the lan until i remove "ip nat inside source route-map 20 interface GigabitEthernet0/0.20 overload" from the routers config.
.. Please help
Load-Balancing-Router#show run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2716 bytes
! Last configuration change at 04:09:37 UTC Tue Apr 21 2015 by anprasad
version 15.0
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname Load-Balancing-Router
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
no aaa new-model
no ipv6 cef
ip source-route
ip cef
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.2
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.100
ip dhcp pool LAN
network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 192.168.1.1
ip domain name fnu.ac.fj
multilink bundle-name authenticated
license udi pid CISCO1921/K9 sn FGL150925YE
username anprasad privilege 15 secret 5 $1$Oy40$h13lWAN4upzI19L6/MXjf/
username aaa privilege 15 secret 5 $1$W3JH$LMd0LUtdxJlXXJkB.NxjB0
ip ssh version 1
class-map match-all 512K-Outbound
match access-group name DR-512K-OutBound
class-map match-all 10240K-Outbound
match access-group name DR-1024K-OutBound
policy-map DR-Outbound
class 10240K-Outbound
police rate 10240000 bps burst 1920000 bytes
conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
class 512K-Outbound
police rate 512000 bps burst 96000 bytes
conform-action transmit
exceed-action drop
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.10
description Student-Internet
encapsulation dot1Q 10
ip address 202.0.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.20
description Staff-Internet
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip address 202.0.2.1 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
shutdown
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description LAN-Network
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
duplex auto
speed auto
interface FastEthernet0/0/0
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
ip forward-protocol nd
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source route-map 10 interface GigabitEthernet0/0.10 overload
ip nat inside source route-map 20 interface GigabitEthernet0/0.20 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 202.0.1.2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 202.0.2.2
ip access-list extended DR-10240K-OutBound
permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
ip access-list extended DR-512K-OutBound
permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
route-map 10 permit 10
match ip address 100
match interface GigabitEthernet0/0.10
route-map 20 permit 20
match ip address 100
match interface GigabitEthernet0/0.20
snmp-server community fnuro RO
control-plane
line con 0
logging synchronous
login local
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
login local
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
endHi,
I would like to ask if you are done with your configuration? Is it working?
next month we will add an addition ISP and I will try to configure it?
Hope you'll give me some ideas.
thank you -
Accessing individual server in load-balanced cluster not working as expected
We have a cluster set up with multiple managed servers and hardware load
balancers sitting in front to direct traffic. We have the frontend host
configured to be the dns name of the single URL for the cluster, which maps
to the IP address that the load balancers balance. When accessing part of
our site (a WebLogic portal) at
http://server1/portalApp/appmanager/portal/desktop
(where server1 is the name of one of the managed servers)
the portal performs a redirect to the login page at
/portalApp/appmanager/portal/desktop?_nfbp=true&_pageLabel=login_page.
The URL that results in the browser is not what I would expect, which would be
http://server1/portalApp/...
Instead, it is
http://cluster/portalApp/...
where cluster is the frontend host setting. Is there any way to avoid
this, so we can perform directed testing on specific managed servers?
Thanks,
Andy
Hi Maria, thanks for your help! I wrote a simple test jsp that does a
redirect if a parameter is set, otherwise it doesn't do anything. When I
accessed the jsp at server1/app/test.jsp?a=true, something (I assume
either WebLogic or the load balancer) rewrote the URL after the redirect
(the redirect was to /app/test.jsp). The URL that appears in the browser
after the redirect is cluster/app/test.jsp. Do you know if this happens
because of WebLogic or the load balancer? Our load balancers are Cisco
11503's I believe.
Do you think it would make any difference if I leave the frontend host
for the cluster to be the dns name of the cluster, and then if I set the
frontend host for each server to be the dns name of that specific server?
Currently each server does not have any value entered for frontend host.
Thanks!
Andy
Maria Carcedo <[email protected]> wrote in
news:31424665.1108079763742.JavaMail.root@jserv5:
> Hi Andy!
>
> We had basically the same problem and we fixed it by configuring the
> F5 load balancer to maintain the session with whichever server it
> started the connection with. We had to enable cookie persistence, more
> specifically the Active HTTP Cookie, with Method insert (do not enter
> any expiration or anything else in any other field other than what is
> already there when the page loads -> F5 bug).
>
> So if the original request from the portal goes to server1, every
> subsequent request will go to server1 as well. The next session
> request will go to server2 and every subsequent request within that
> session will go to server 2, and so on (assuming you have round
> robin).
>
> I hope this helps!
>
> Maria
-
How does load-balancing with WebCache work - is there still a bottleneck?
Hello,
We're migrating an old Forms 6i app to 10.1.2.0.2 (apps servers = Redhat Linux), and are starting to consider using WebCache to loadbalance between two application servers.
My question is this - say we have apps servers A and B, both running Forms and Reports Services. We use Webcache on server A (don't have the luxury of a third apps server...) to load balance between A and B. So all initial requests come into A, which in some cases may then be diverted to start a new Forms session on B.
For those users whose middle-tier sessions are now running on B - will all network traffic for their Forms session continue to be routed through Webcache on A, then to B, over the course of the session? Or does Webcache somehow shunt the whole connection to be straight between the client PC and server B, for the duration of that Forms session?
If the former, does that mean that the server hosting Webcache can still be a significant bottleneck for network traffic? Have people found load-balancing with Webcache to be useful..?
Thanks in advance,
JamesHi gudnyc,
Thanks for posting on Adobe forums.
For HDPI you do not have to do any It will adjust automatically.
http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop-elements/using/whats-new.html
Regards,
Sandeep -
Load balancing is not working correctly during server fail-over
Hi,
We have 4 weblogic instances in a cluster with proxy-plugin load balancing the requests. When instance 1 is shutdown, all the subsequent requests from users whose sessions were at instance1 are sent over to instance2 only. They are not divided between instance2, instance3 and instance4.
Can somebody, please, tell if there is any solution to this so that sessions for users who were being redirected to instance1 will be divided between instances 2,3 and 4.
Thanks,
PrasadIt is not possible because in a cluster server1 always chooses the same secondary server (with some algorithm)
So all sessions with primaries on server1 will have secondaries on same secondary server.
So if primary is down, all the requests(that has primaries on server1) will be routed to the same secondary server.
-Vijay -
Loader.close doesn't work in Flash but does work in Flash player
When testing a movie in flash with simulate download the
Loader.close() function doesn't seem to work when trying to cancel
a load but it does work in a browser! You'll need to try to load a
movie that has sound. The loader looks as if it stops but then the
sound that's in the loaded movie will play, proving it hasn't
stopped loading
add a button with instance name btnCancelSee this cool mp3 xml player with visualization, playlist and
skins. Fully customisable. Vector.
http://flashden.net/item/mp3-xml-strongplayerstrong-with-visualization-and-skins-vectorise d/11851
Maybe you are looking for
-
External Display not working (descriptive details in post)
Hello Background: I have been using a black Macbook (last year's model - before the aluminum ones came out) and connecting it to a VIZIO VW22L HDTV10T (television/monitor) via a mini-DVI to VGA adapter. This setup always worked, although it was a bit
-
I restored, but I need an AC adapter.
My Ipod did not come with an AC adapter, but i had to restore it. After I finished restoring I got that icon that tells me I need to plug my Ipod into the AC adapter, but I dont have one. All I have is the usb cable that plugs it in to my Ibook. So n
-
How to send a xml to a web service
Hi All I've generated a xml report that I need to send to a web site that I could imagine have a web service to receive the report. The question is: how should I send my xml file ?? I've tried to find docs about it but there are a lot of complex exam
-
Hey, I ordered through the up to date program August 31 and it shipped and it said it should have delivered by the 4th of September. It's still not here yet? I'm in Manitoba. It didn't give a tracking numbers so not sure what I should do? Anyone else
-
I would like to setup and be able to click on a Firefox profile (I assume profile) or pass parameters to the firefox.exe and have firefox open about 6 separate windows (not tabs) set to different home pages. If I use the Pipe Symbol in Options, it wi