MPX and Video Conferencing

Want to check to see if MPX VT can do this. Want to have a video conference where the presenter will see all of the participants but the remote people will just see the presenter.
I see in the documentation that in a video conference, the default seems to be to see who ever is talking.
Can I do this with MPX VT2.x?
Thanks.

Is that to say MP 8 would fix this issue as well (from the table above)? Because right now we are hard-pressed to justify them upgrading from MPX to MP8 given that it does not fix the voice prompt issue I posted in another section. We'd definitely rather upgrade to MP8 (even though it means them buying 2GB more ram for their existing server) than crossgrade to MPX-VT.

Similar Messages

VoIP,data and video conferencing Design

hi
i want to design a network that support VoIP,data and Video conferencing for two offices (head offices and branch office ).What will be the best option ??
thanks
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

You can see this URL. The SRND is very useful. You can find information about the diferent models that you have to work. MCUs, GW, GK, endpoints and other components.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/video/ps1870/products_implementation_design_guide_book09186a00808f0e58.html

RV082 and video conferencing

RV082 router is not allowing video conferencing through to Polycom 7000 HD. voice comes through but no video.
Have tried several things.
1.) necessary ports ( Polycom provided) forwarded to designated internal ip / firewall acess allowed ( external ips to designated internal ip ) respective port Qos set to high.
2.) set dmzhost to designated internal ip address. Respective port Qos set to high.
3.) enabled Upnp with necessary (Polycom provided) ports forwarded to designated internal ip address.
Is something missed?
Other option is obtain second external ip address and connect to DMZ port. Trying to avoid a second external ip.

multicast passthrough is enabled.
At this point I am leaning towards a bandwidth problem. Since this unit is sharing the local network - there may not be
enough bandwidth the support the video signal but sufficient for voice.

Messages, Facetime, iChat and Video Conferencing

We are using 10.7 and a colleague is using 10.8. Facetime only seems to allow two people to video conference. ichat allows at least four. I am told in Messages in 10.8 beta, selecting video opens Facetime (with only two video users.)
1) With 10.8, is there going to be the capability for more than two to video conference?
2) Is iChat being replaced by Messages?

Hi,
If you had Buddy list with iChat before you had Messages then it will do the same Video Chats iChat did.
For Mac to Mac (AIM to AIM or Jabber to Jabber) this can be up to 4 people including yourself.
At the Text Chat Level an "Account" is added to the list in Messages menu > Preferences Accounts.
This uses an Apple ID.
If you open New Messages then you can select Contacts (Address Book List) and text chat to them
Uploaded with Skitch!
Those on iPhone (Phone Numbers or Apple IDs) and iPads (generally Apple IDs) and certain Touches can then be iMessaged.
(As the pic says you can also access the Buddies in the iChat style Buddy lists (rather than display the Buddy lists) and Text chat to them.
At the next stage, as it were, the Blue Icon has become a Video icon.
For iMessages contacts this starts up FaceTime.
Uploaded with Skitch!
FaceTime is the Video Chat option in iOS 5 devices and is limited by the processors on iOS devices and only does 1-1 chats.
There is however Version on your Mac in Lion so that you can either do 1-1 contact with other Macs and/or Video chats to Phones and iPads.
So...
Your Mac with Messages and the fomer iChat Buddy Lists can do up to 4 way Video chats with the Buddies in those Lists - with the proviso that they are logged in to the same Service.
Messages also adds in Texting iMessages to your Address Book Contacts using either iPhone Numbers (only iPhones - not other phones) or their Apple ID (does include some iPads that also have SIM cards)
These Contacts can be FaceTimed which can be activated from within Messages
Uploaded with Skitch!
8:47 PM Tuesday; April 17, 2012
Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"
 iMac 2.5Ghz 5i 2011 (Lion 10.7.3)
 G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
 MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
 Mac OS X (10.6.8),
"Limit the Logs to the Bits above Binary Images."  No, Seriously

Designing Cisco Video conferencing solution

Hi All,
I need to design a single site Cisco IP Video Conferencing soultion which should support web, chat, ISDN and email etc support.
there will be one conferencing room which will be communicating with other remote or traving users.
the requirement is that remote or travelling users should be able to have the video conferencing facility with the Headoffice(single site) and vise versa.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Regards,
Waqas

I would recommend Cisco unified presence server for your deployment with MPX. That will give you chat, voice and video conferencing. If you dont use MPX then you can only do point-to-point video CUPS on its own doesnt support video conferencing.
YOu can also intergrate with exchange to view meetings and unity to listen to voicemails.
You can use VTA for the remote clients and 7985 for central site or some sort of tanberg phone if you want a larger screen.
The remote users are going to have to have a pretty low latency connection to get good quality video/voice.
HTH
Matt

What System Can use for Phone & Video Conferencing

Hello,
What System to recommend to use for our Small office on both Voice and Video Conferencing.
and to our branch offices.
Regards,
Angelo

Hi Angelo,
As Jaime suggested the design needs to be validated before its implemented. Assuming you are using CUCM, you can look at the possibility of using 9971 series IP phones with Video conferencing capable ISR G2 routers with PVDM-3. Please check the following
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/collaboration-endpoints/unified-ip-phone-9971/data_sheet_c78-565717.html
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/voice-video-conferencing-isr-routers/qa_c67-649850.html
HTH
Manish

Video conferencing in training and event management.

Hello experts,
My client wants to configure the video conferencing facility in the training and event management module. Can somebody advice me on that part as in how to do so?
Thanks and Regards,
Kanika Talwar.

Hi
In Table V_T77TNM_DC
We need to have the below entries
TNM                                              CL_HRTNM_VALO_COMPUT_GUI_FR
TNM       HRTNM00_REPMOD        CL_HRTNM_VALO_COMPUT_GUI_FR
TNM       MP168400                       CL_HRBAS_INFTY_1684_GUI_FR
TNM       RPCTNM9S_REP            CL_HRTNM_INFTY_1036_GUI_FR
Regards
Kenu

I work for a teaching hospital. We are using groups of 20 to 30 iPads for access to patient electronic records, video conferencing software, and other, HIPPA compliant apps. I need to be able to access the iPads to shut down and erase in case of loss.

I work for a teaching hospital. I have started a program to place Physicians and key support personnel on iPads for electonic medical records, video conferencing software, and other HIPPA compliant issue. I have a need to have one central program that can push out updates, other information, but most importantly, can erase the iPad in cases of loss or stolen. Can anyone direct me to such software.
Thanks,
Wayne Hodges

The Mac mini does have somewhat powerful specs at top end.
Mac mini with OS X Server features a 2.3GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 processor that delivers incredible speed and performance, thanks to innovations like Turbo Boost 2.0, Hyper-Threading, and an integrated memory controller. Add in 6MB of L3 cache, and you’ll find that Mac mini with OS X Server is packed with power.
http://www.apple.com/mac-mini/server/
Here is a list of mdm's:
MDMs
Airwatch, Meraki, MobileIron, OS X Server, or Zenprise
Airwatch
http://www.air-watch.com/
Meraki -- A free MDM [ expect lots of email and phone calls about upgrades ]
http://www.meraki.com/products/systems-manager/
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4067210?tstart=0
Good howto by Sergio Sosa.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2594001?start=15&tstart=0
MobileIron
http://www.mobileiron.com/
Zenprise
http://www.zenprise.com/

Video conferencing and SIP URI setup

I am new to Cisco's video products and am trying to configure them for some simple video conferencing. I currently have the following in our environment:
CUCM v7.1.5
VCS X7.2.1
TMS v14.1.0
MCU 5320 v4.3(2.17)
EX90 vTC5.1.2
I am also new to SIP URI dialing. I have done some base configuration on my VCS, TMS, and MCU, following the installation and configuration guide. What I am struggling with is what I need in order to set up the SIP URI info for the EX90. Does there need to be an AD account configured that has a sip directory value? Or can I just use whatever SIP address I want as long as the domain matches what I put in the VCS for the domain and allow list?
I followed the following guides:
TMS
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/tms/install_guide/Cisco_TMS_install_guide_14-1.pdf
VCS
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/vcs/install_guide/Cisco_VCS_Getting_Started_X7-2.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/vcs/config_guide/Cisco_VCS_Basic_Configuration_Single_VCS_Control_Deployment_Guide_X7-2.pdf
MCU
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/mcu/install_guide/Cisco_TelePresence_MCU_5300_Series_Getting_started.pdf
VCS & CUCM Call routing
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/vcs/config_guide/Cisco_VCS_Cisco_Unified_Communications_Manager_Deployment_Guide_CUCM_6-1_7_8_and_X7-0.pdf
Any assistance and understanding that can be shared would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance,
Mr. A little confused - Arras V. Martin

Hi Arras. Good morning. I'm going to hopefully answer some of your questions you have here. You also may find that the Telepresense Community on the Support Forums is a great place to post this as well.
First, I would recomment to you to update from TMS 14.1 to TMS 14.1.1. There was a major scheduling bug in this release, and had to be removed and updated with TMS 14.1.1. I would start by updating TMS to that version.
CUCM 7.1.5 is a bit older release. There are some nuasances with this version that have been fixed in 8.6.2 CUCM. Also, if running 8.5 CUCM or higher, you can add this to TMS and manage TP endpoints on CUCM via this version. So if you have CTS endpoints or EX, MX and C-series registered to CUCM, you can manage and schedule those units in TMS.
Q -Does there need to be an AD account configured that has a sip directory value?
A - If you add the device in TMS and have it registered to VCS as SIP, you can configure the SIP URI field to whatever SIP URI you wish to assign to the system. As long as the domain you specify is part of VCS domain and your allow list pattern or rule is ok, the system should register just fine.
If you running SIP only environment, you can always restrict bookings in TMS to allow SIP only if this is what your gearing towards.
Hope this helps you out a bit. Feel free to post any more questions here you may have and will do my best to get those answered for ya.
VR
Patrick

Video conferencing between CCM and CCME

Hi,
We are having CCM4.1(3)at central location.In branch location we are having CCME 4.0(2).Both the locations are connected through leased circuit. We enabled Video on IP Phone which is registered to CCM and also we configured CCME for video. When we start doing video conferencing between these two location, it's not happenning. In VT advantage it is showing local image on Local & Remote screen. I don't know what is the problem.
Can you guys please tell me wheather Video Conferencing will work between CCM & CCME over the leased circuit using VT Advantage.
If it works, please tell me what are configuration parameters i need to configure on CCM & CCME.
Thanks & Regards

By default all IP traffic is permitted through a VPN tunnel except broadcast and multicast traffic. It basically is a matter of how the video software you are using works. If it is a multicast application then it will not work through an ipsec tunnel, if it is a unicast application then it should be able to work.
Also if this video is on the Internet tries to enable split tunnel on the VPN endpoint. Now if the issue is with a video that is on the PC, this might be because a software corruption of the OS, so try reinstalling the VPN Client software

Video Conferencing and Port numbers

i am currently developing a video conferencing application with JMF and the problem i have in mind is, if ever i would like to add more client on the video conferencing there is also an exponential increase of the use of port numbers?... how can i resolve this issue... Thanks..

Hi I actually work in the same... my question is... How do i to avoid use of 20 port numbers
Thanks

Any body know - Video and Voice conferencing from Novell ?

Any body know - Video and Voice conferencing from Novell (product similar on the functional capabilities on Lync-server) ?
Serg

Hello,
I do suppose you are talking about the Novell Teaming + Conferencing solution or products ....
Conferencing is gone ... As far as I know no future @ Novell...
Teaming is now Vibe ....
Stephan

Video conferencing, tele conferencing and chat in jsp

Hi,
I have to add a module in my jsp project, module is for video conferencing, tele conferencing and chat.
Can any body suggest me that what should I use for that like flash or something else?
Waiting for the response.
Thanks
Gaurav Agrawal

gauravjlj wrote:
I think, I got your point.
You are saying that Java Web Start are using to install client applications remotely. Am I right?Basically, yes.
and these applications can be developed in AWT/Swing or Applet.Yes.
But my concern is different.
I need a web application, that means application will be running on the web server and more than 1 clients will access this via the http URL. ..This is equally easy for either an embedded applet or an app. launched using JWS. So long as the server-side component of the teleconferencing is at the same site that served the app., either can access it while in a sand-box. If the server-side component is at a different site, either type would need to be digitally signed, and trusted.
..I don't have to install the application to each client separately. .. OK - not for the server-side component, but for the client-side component, it sure does need to be installed if it is either an embedded applet or a JWS app. The only real difference is that for some people, downloading an applet is not seen as 'installing' software, though in reality it is. An applet must be cached on the client-side before the code is invoked to make the applet appear in the web page. Where JWS provides a better user experience than applets though, is that the browser (and JRE) cache might be cleared (effectively 'uninstalling' the applet), by things outside Java's control (such as the user clearing the browser's cache using the browser's own controls).
..so I need the video and audio conferencing in this application itselt. it will be like a website.
so please tell me, what I have to do?I am still not convinced that this needs to be, or will provide a better user experience as, an applet. But let's put that thought aside for the moment.
Can you do this video conferencing using the cross-platform version of the JMF? The cross-platform version of JMF does not support as many formats(1) as the JMF performance pack - and you might find that the PP version supports some formats that offer better compression than the x-plat version is able to handle. Note that this can be tested once you have the server-side component in place - it is pretty much the same for an applet, JWS app., or plain old desktop app. such as JMStudio (provided as a sample app. with JMF) to access the web service that provides the video feed.
1) [http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/desktop/media/jmf/2.1.1/formats.html].

CUCM registered SX10s and adhoc video conferencing

Hi All,
We have a customer with CUCM 10.5 looking to do some very basic video conferencing (multi party but only need loudest talker switching). Simplicity is key here, they are used to adhoc conferencing including MeetMe in CUCM using traditional IP phones. They are looking at installing SX10s in a few meeting rooms, registered to CUCM 10.5. The questions I have are:
i) Is it possible to use a G2 ISR (2911 etc.) with a homogeneous conference bridge configured for h264 / HD 720p and have the SX10s be part of a conference? The data sheet indicates the SX10s support 720p30 (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/collaboration-endpoints/telepresence-quick-set-series/datasheet-c78-731274.html). I understand there would be some serious limitations here like no transcoding (all parties in the conference have to support the 720p stream), this shouldn't be an issue as all devices will be SX10s.
ii) Is it possible to initiate a MeetMe conference from an SX10, either from the remote or a touch 10?
ii) Is it possible to dial into a MeetMe conference from an SX10, either from the remote or a touch 10?
iii) Is it possible to escalate a point to point call to an adhoc conference from an SX10, either from the remote or a touch 10?
The Cisco TelePresence Endpoints and Cisco Unified Communications Manager document (http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/telepresence/endpoint/codec-c-series/tc7/administration-guide/administering-endpoints-running-tc72-on-ucm1051.pdf) has a few lines on adhoc conferencing (page 54) which says "To enable ad hoc conferencing the CUCM must be set up with a Conference Bridge (media resources), and the conference bridge must be added as a Cisco Telepresence MCU in CUCM." Which makes me doubt the PVDM3 video conference bridge would be supported.
Are there any other solutions to a simple video conference requirement, or would it have to be a MCU registered to CUCM?
Thanks,
Jonathan

With the SX10's registered to CUCM there is several options here. One is that if they own a good amount of CUWL then there is the ability to get free TelePresence Server licenses. I believe it is for every 30 CUWL pro they get 1 screen license and the ability to install conductor. In order to install this you need to make sure that you have VMware resources to handle those two installs. Then you can have your ad hoc meeting configured in that.
If they want a physical appliance than a MCU 53xx can be used as well. License it based on how many people you want in one bridge.
In either case you will need to configure the Media Resource Group option in UCM to point to those SIP trunks to allow for the 3 way video call to happen and it will be automatic to the end user. They will see a call coming in and then the option to accept and merge.
I remember reading about using a GSR but it has to have the DSP 3 module in it for the video encoding.

Is video conferencing and real-time communication available in an on-premise Sharepoint 2013 Server farm?

Hello Community
    In a Sharepoint 2013 Server on-premise server farm
is there a way to provide video conferencing and a form of
real-time communication even taking into consideration
using Yammer?
    Thank you
    Shabeaut

Hello Alex Brassington
    Is there a way to embed/make accessible Lync server's audio/video conferencing functionality
into a SharePoint 2013 Server farm intranet site?
    Shabeaut

MPX and Video Conferencing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for