MRP Job not picking 'few materials'

Hello,
I am facing strange issue. We have been running MRP daily job (since July09) for few MRP controllers.
We have found that system is not selecting 'few materials'...
One of the mateial ABC has not been selected since 29th Aug and other XYZ since 2nd of Sept...
But User has converted the Planned order to PR on 2nd and 3rd Sept respectively....
Whereas when I displays the results for MRP run (MD03)for these materials it does shows the PR.
But MRP job does not picks these....
Even I changed the 'processing indicator' 'ON' but it did not work.
Please suggest any possible causes.
kind regards,
JPS

Hello DB49,
I did run MDAB then MDRE and then MRP run for MRP controller ;Material belongs to...
But No results; MRP run did not pick the ABC material.
Even I have set the 'display list' parameter during MRP run but it did not pick material in question....
Any Idea, When I try to create planning file manually MD20.....
And select any of the 'check box' it says "The material ABC has been marked for the MRP run"
Please suggest...
======================MDAB=============================
Number of set planning file entries:          0
=======================MDRE===================
Plng file entries for operational planning run:
No. of deleted panning file entries:          0
Planning file entries for long-term planning:
Complete statistics:
Plng file entries for operational planning run:
No. of deleted or changed planning file entries:          0
Planning file entries for long-term planning:
No. of deleted or changed planning file entries:          0
==================MRP run for (MRP controller; Material belongs to)====================
regards,
JPS
Edited by: Bhatti JPS on Sep 10, 2009 9:30 AM

Similar Messages

File Adapter is not picking few files

Hi All,
I am facing some issue in file adapter. Below are the possible file format that we need to pick.
File format sample 1:
865|FieldOrder|AK|620005168|1|Reject|Line Qty can not be Canceled,xyz,abc|The line has been shipped,fgh,hjk
File format sample 2:
865|FieldOrder|AK|570000259|10|Accept|
- All the fields are separated by '|' & last filed is terminated by 'eol'.
- The last two fields (C7 & C8) also have sub fields separted by ',' as shown in sample 1.
- Fields C7 & C8 are optional. (Sample 2 is shown above)
- File contains only one record.
We are using below mentioned XSD which is working fine in case of sample 1 as shown above. When we have a file of format like sample 2 then file adapter is failing to pick the file. I also tried minoccur='0' attribute which also not worked. Please help me out to find the exact XSD which will pick both type of formats (sample 1& sample2).
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:nxsd="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/nxsd"
targetNamespace="http://us.fujitsu.com/865_EDIFile"
xmlns:tns="http://us.fujitsu.com/865_EDIFile"
elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"
nxsd:encoding="ASCII" nxsd:stream="chars" nxsd:version="NXSD">
<xsd:element name="Root-Element">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="Root" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="C1" type="xsd:string" nxsd:style="terminated"
nxsd:terminatedBy="|" nxsd:quotedBy='"'></xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="C2" type="xsd:string" nxsd:style="terminated"
nxsd:terminatedBy="|" nxsd:quotedBy='"'></xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="C3" type="xsd:string" nxsd:style="terminated"
nxsd:terminatedBy="|" nxsd:quotedBy='"'></xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="C4" type="xsd:string" nxsd:style="terminated"
nxsd:terminatedBy="|" nxsd:quotedBy='"'></xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="C5" type="xsd:string" nxsd:style="terminated"
nxsd:terminatedBy="|" nxsd:quotedBy='"'></xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="C6" type="xsd:string" nxsd:style="terminated"
nxsd:terminatedBy="|" nxsd:quotedBy='"'></xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="C7">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="C7_child" type="xsd:string"
nxsd:style="array" nxsd:cellSeparatedBy=","
nxsd:arrayTerminatedBy="|"
maxOccurs="unbounded"></xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="C8">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="C8_child" type="xsd:string"
nxsd:style="array" nxsd:cellSeparatedBy=","
nxsd:arrayTerminatedBy="${eol}"
maxOccurs="unbounded"></xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:schema>



Hi,
>>2) Even for those few picked files, why are we seeing less no. of Idocs
than the file contents.
Check the mapping by using the payload from SXMB_MONI. I think the mapping is not correct.
>>3) Why is the adapter always picking files immediately even if a poll
interval is set.
Once the objects are activated in ID the channel picks the file immediately and then it waits for the polling interval and repeats the process.
Regards,
Jai Shankar

Additive cost not picking in costing run

Hi!
I am using additive costing , while doing costing run system is picking up additive cost for header material, that when BOM exploding, but not picking additive cost for componenets.
for us componets are also having price control "S", standard cost esimate has to run. as per valuation variant planned price will be consider for the standard price for components, where there is no BOM
any suggestions on this?
why additve cost is not picking for materials where there is no BOM explosion.
regs,
ramesh

Hi
If child is not having BOM - Then Maintain a Special Proc Key 20 in the Costing view of Mat Master and whatever price you maintain in the Planned Price Fields -can be released as a cost estimate
In that case, If you maintain additive cost, it does not make sense.. You can straight away maintain the requird price in planned price
br, Ajay M

Automatic MRP could not work for several materials

Dear Expert,
I have problem here in running MRP. Some of the materials were not automatically running MRP. While when I tried to run it manually using MD01 it works.
May be u can give me some idea why? When I tried to check the setting, i found in the table all the materials with complete status KCVDLSBGZXA are not automatically running MRP.
Is it because of that complete status setting? if yes where could i found that setting ?
Thanks
Pauline

Paulin,
MRP relevant changes can be new procrument proposel, changes done in MRP view of material, changes in qunatity for re-order planning relevant materials etc.
MRP will not done untill and unless you have entry of materials in planning files.
i am not agree with you on the point that auto MRP is running for the material for which there is no planning file entry.
another things is please , provide details of material master like MRP type etc for the material for which planning file entry is there but MRP is not considering it.
another question is , what result you are expecting after MRP run ....? i mean how you come to a conclusion that MRP is not run for few of the materils but its done sucessfully for other materials ......?
please check it again and reply.
Regards

My Iphone and Ipad will not pick up my new email messages..for the last few days...I have tried deleteling the account and reseting it and it still only picks up the old messages? Anyone else having tis problem? ANy ideas how to fix it?

My Iphone and Ipad will not pick up my new email messages..for the last few days...I have tried deleteling the account (a number of times..) and setting the account back up? and it still only picks up the old messages? Anyone else having tis problem? Any ideas how to fix it?
This just started happening for no reason...no changes to the phone or Ipad?

my iphone and ipad will not send or receive emails or messages for the last few days. it is telling me that cannot connect to server

Few materials are not considered in MCTE,MCTG

Hi,
i done a report on Daily/monthy Sales and the results are not matching with standard SD sales reports (MCTE,MCTG etc). On analysis i found few materials which are actually billed is not considered by the Standard reports. Those materials belongs to trading materials. What could be the reason.
Suggestions are highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Aswin.

Hi
go to mm03 -> sales org 2 screen -> check if Matl statistics grp is maintained.
thanks

Job executing the SSIS pkg via cmdExec line step not picking the config details

Job executing the SSIS pkg via cmdExec line step not picking the config details (of prod server connections/parameters)
specified in dtsConfig file and by default using the values present in the pkg (which is of dev env). I have to open the package
uncheck "Enable package configuration" save the package and check it again and save again then the package will use the prod config.
What could be the reason? and how to fix this?
The SSIS pkg and the dtsCofig reside in same folder of network drive.
SQL Server R2 Ent Ed
Thanks

Hi Ramzi24,
This is the by design behavior. The Dtexec utility will apply the default package configurations for the second time after applying the options specified in the command lines or other package configurations configured in the job step. In this way, as long
as the default package configurations file is valid, the configurations of it cannot be overwritten.
If the package is not deployed/installed, the Dtexec utility looks for the XML configurations file according to the file path defined in the Package Configurations Organizer window. In this situation, you need to either disable the package configurations or
modify the XML file path in the BIDS.
If the package is already deployed/installed, you need to modify the package as above or re-specify the install folder for the package configurations file.
Reference:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms141682(v=sql.105).aspx
Regards,
Mike Yin
TechNet Community Support

SSIS ETL does not pick the file from Share point when it execute through SQL Agent job

I have created one SSIS packages, which pick the file from the Share point document library. its work successfully, once it execute through the VS project application.
But when i create a job in SQL Server Agent for this package then it does not pick the file and job getting fail.
Just for more update, SQL Server has been install in Cluster mode and using BIDS 2012 with SQl Server 2012.

Hi PriyankGupta,
SQL Server Integration Services is not cluster awareness, and does not support failover from one cluster node to another. So, in your clustered environment, make sure SSIS is installed on each node in the cluster. In other word, SSIS must be installed on
the server where the SQL Server Agent job is created.
If you use any third party task/component or drivers, make sure they are installed on the SQL Server Agent job server. Besides, also pay attention to the protection level of the package as well as 32-bit or 64-bit runtime mode of the package. For more information,
please see:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/systemcenter/en-US/e13c137c-1535-4475-8c2f-c7e6e7d125fc/how-do-i-troubleshoot-ssis-packages-failed-execution-in-a-sql-agent-job
If the issue persists, please post the error message in the job history for further analysis.
Regards,
Mike Yin
TechNet Community Support

Process Order is not picking the follow-up material

Hi Gurus,
We have changed a BOM by discontinuing a component and giving a follow-up material with the valid from dates as 18/5/09. and then MRP is run on that nignt ( mrp job set to run daily in the back ground). and on 19/05/09 a Process Order is created from the planned orders genereated by the MRP run.
now, we found that the new componenet (follow-up) is not copied into the process order, but the old compomemt (discontinued) is removed.
MRP parameters are correctly defined (Planning mode is set to 2) . Please let me know if we are missing anything.
Thanks,
N

Hi
Pl ensure that the Following requirements have been met before you can use the discontinuation functionality:
1) Both materials must be planned using MRP.
2) The base unit of measure of the follow-up material must be the same as the base unit of measure of the discontinued material.
3) You must enter discontinuation data for the discontinued item and follow-up data for the follow-up item.
and Also refer the SAP link for Complete Details
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/b1/c044d1439a11d189410000e829fbbd/content.htm
Regards
Brahmaji

Deltas are not pick up by the data source

Hi,
From one weak onwards my data source is not pick any deltas today i found that the luw's are struck into LBWQ.I can see the luw's in lbwq .In rsa7 there is no luw'sie It shows 0.My data source 2lis_02_scl. The V3 job compleated success fully every day.
So how can i clear the LUW's to rsa7. Remember this is production .
This is very urgent please respond.
Thanks in advance.
Sharma.
Message was edited by: Amol Kulkarni

Hi
Here a few links on the topic..
/thread/101086 [original link is broken]
Luw in the delta queue.
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/01/19/logistic-cockpit-delta-mechanism--episode-three-the-new-update-methods
Regards..

Plant is not picking up in Purchase Order

Hi all,
I am given a fresh system to create some transactional data for R & D purpose. i have created few materials at plant level.
while creating the purchase order the system is asking for the plant and when i give the plant the field is getting cleared off.
checked all the assignments with other organizational elements and plant parameters as well.
I am able to post initial stock entry for the same plant.
What could be the reasons for not picking up the plant.
Thanks
Syed

May there are some plant related mandatory condition records are maintained in your system, since you may not have maintained it, the system is not accepting the plant. Check for condition records.

MRP job takes more time (Duration / Sec)

Hello PP Guru’s,
I have below situation in production environment,
MRP job for plant – A (Takes more time – 14.650)
MRP job for plant – B (Takes less time – 4.512)
When I compare the variant / attributes with plant A and B, I observe only difference in attribute is scheduling (2 - Lead Time Scheduling and Capacity Planning) for plant A.
For plant B scheduling (1- Determination of Basic Dates for Planned) it was updated.
So in my observation this scheduling is playing a major role for MRB job which takes more time in plant – A.
I am in process of changing the variant attribute for plant – A from scheduling 2 to scheduling 1.
I wanted to know from experts whether if I change any impact / problem will happen in future for plant A or not.
Please let me know what all the hidden impacts are there if I change the scheduling in variant attribute.
I look forward to your valuable input to reduce time for my MRP related job.
Regards,
Kumar S

Hi Kumar,
You have no need to change the inhouse production time you just need to update the Lot size dependent inhouse production time in work scheduling view of material master. That you can do by scheduling the routing/recipe.
Transactions CA97 or CA97N can be used to update the in-house production time with the information from the routing.
If business don't want to have the capacity planning for planned orders then you change the scheduling from 2 to 1 basic date scheduling.
Expert Caetano already answer you query
The reports listed below can be used to compare the MRP past executions regarding the runtime:
RMMDMONI: This report compares the runtime of the MRP execution and also provides the total of planning elements (planned orders, purchase requisitions, etc) changed, created or deleted. It also shows which planning parameters where used and how much time MRP spent on each step (database read, BOM explosion, MRP calculation, scheduling, BAdIs, etc). With this information is possible to observe the relation of runtime and number of elements changed/created/deleted and also to see on which step MRP is taking more time.
RMMDPERF: This report shows the "material hit list", that means, which materials had the highest runtime during the MRP execution and also on which step MRP is taking more time. Knowing which materials have the highest runtime, allow you to isolate the problem and reproduce it on MD03, where it is possible to run an ABAP or SQL trace for a more detailed analysis.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

AR Credit Memo's not picked by Auto Invoice

Hi gurus,
I am facing an issue in loading the CM's through Auto Invoice. when we submit the Auto Invoice Master Program, it is populating the Interface_line_id, but it's not populating request_id, so eventually the Auto Invoice Import program is not picking those records with request_id as null.
Please advice me, how to process the CM's.
Thanks
Srinivas

Hi Ivruksh,
Thanks for the reply, the reference you gave was not actually related to the issue I had, let me put it this way,
Our Auto Invoice Job is scheduled at midnight, it runs and process only few CM's, rest of them are left behind with out any error message in error tables. Al I can see in the ra_interface_lines_all table is interface_line_id is populated, which shows that the Auto Invoice program has picked all the records but it is processing only few, the rest are left out with out any error message.
Interestingly, when I tried to run those stuck CM's Individual one by one its gets successfully processed.
Is anyone faced with similar kind of issue, kindly let me know of any solutions you guys had.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Srinivas

While creating the Transfer Order system is not picking Sale order stock?

Hi All,
In the B2B process the system is not picking the stock from from sale order stock while creating the transfer order? Please suggest.
Summary : Here we are creating the PR in the sale order and STO is created using the same PR to procure the materials from the WM plant to sale order plant. Since here intialy we are moving the stock to our sale order in WM plant and then picking the same. But while creating the Transfer order system is not picking the sale order stock in WM plant.
Regards.

C S Javali
Check in schedule line in transaction flow whether Transfer Req /assembly is checked or not
Regards
Pradeep

Text File is not picking with data

Hi Experts,
I am doing file to file scenario without IR as file will be generated by the ECC system and places in SAP FTP App Server.
My job is to pick up the file and send it to the Third Party Application Server.
But when i am picking up the Text file the data in the file is converting into special characters like below format.
ÅÁÄÅÙ@ððððððâÖÕÄÅçöôðð@@@@@@òððùð÷ñ÷ðñ%@@@@@@@@@@@@@@òððùð÷ñ÷%ÄÅãÁÉÓ@ðððð
I have tested with other Application server with same file its working fine, but when i send the file from SAP FTP Appl server the data is converting in the above format.
Right now when i open file zilla it is opening with 3 FTP Appl Server in that suppose lets say the FTP are APP1, APP2, APP3.
1.When i send the file from APP1 through Transport Protocol NFS System the file is picking up and placing successfully in the Third Party APP3 App Server fiolder but the data in the file is converting into special charaters.
2.when i send the same file from APP2 through Transport Protocal FTP the file is picking up and placing successfully in the third party APP3 App server and here the same data is coming in the text file, there is no data conversion.
I am not getting here, when i send the file from APP1 the data is converting but when i send the same file from APP2 App srever the data is posting correctly.
And also i can give you one more info.. if i try with puting the Transport Protocal as FTP in APP1 then i am getting error in sender comm channel as 'log on attempt by User JOHN rejected' : contact your FTP server vendor.
But i think for sending the file from SAP Appl Server we can use TP as NFS rather than FTP.
And also i can give one more info: The Version is the ECC system is using the 4.6c for which there is no compatability for unicodes.
Can anyone please advise what would be the wrong.
Appreciate your inputs
Thanks,
Bhaskar

Hi,
Reason because file is not picked up.
>'log on attempt by User JOHN rejected' : contact your FTP server vendor.
clearly user/password for this FTP server or system is not correct. Get correct userid/password for your Application server where you are trying to poll.
>The Version is the ECC system is using the 4.6c for which there is no compatability for unicodes
File transfer is nothing to unicode here.
Regards,
Gourav

MRP Job not picking 'few materials'

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for