MRP RUN ON PURCHASE ORDER

Hello
i want to run mrp for inter plant purchase order, in this case i don't want to create sales order for the purchase order received from alternate plant, is it possilble to run mrp on all purchase order item without creating sales order to it?
Regards
Nishj

Hi,
I think a STO (Stock Transport Order) flow should meet your need.
In OMD9 define a special procurement key for plant which is sending you the PO.
For the special proc key maintain Proc type as F, Spl. prc type as U, then specify Plant - 2 in plant field.
In MRP - 2 view of the mtl in Plant - 1 maintain this special procurement key.
Now when MRP runs in plant - 1, it will generate a stock transport requisition for Plant - 2.
In Plant - 2 maintain a procurement key say E if its in-house. Run MRP for plant - 1 first followed by Plant - 2.
This way you wont have to follow the PO - SO flow.
Hope it is clear.
Regards,
Vivek

Similar Messages

Reg.MRP Run without sale order

Dear Experts
We are in need of MRP run without sale order. I have created Finished product material (T-Shirt) and assigned components to that and then I ran MRP, If I do so, MRP is exploded but result is not satisfied some non components are displayed.
What is my requirement is ,when I run MRP if there is stock availble production order should be created otherwise Material requirement has to created.
Pls help what is the configuration for MRP run,
Thanks
Rajakumar.K

Hi Raja,
One of your requirements isn't available in R/3.
What is my requirement is ,when I run MRP if there is stock availble production order should be created otherwise Material requirement has to created.
Standard MRP will create Dependent requirements (demand elements). MRP will create order PROPOSALs (purchase reqs or planned orders)(supply elements). MRP can be immediately followed by an additional program that will convert planned orders to Production orders. All these things are possible.
However, MRP will not check for the availability of components, and then selectively create production orders. Availability check, which is not part of MRP, is usually performed at a later part of the production order cycle.
Regards,
DB49

Sale Order MRP Run for All Order Line Items

Greetings...
I have One Sales Order , in which i have ten different Line Items .
Now I have to Run the MRP on basis of Created sales Order so that all Line items wi get consider insingle MRP Run on sales order base MRP Run.
How to take MRP Run of One Sale Order for all Line Items.???
In MD50 , we can have sales Order with Item..

In MD50 you can give only one item at a time.
Its a standard transaction meant to accomodate changes relevant for MRP after plant level MRP run related to specific sales order Item.
so either you need to do it multipal times by changing material or you need to go for MD02.
Please explain bussiness case in detail why you want to restrict your MRP run for items in a specific sales order.
Regards

MRP automatic create Purchase Order ?

Is anybody knows can MRP create Purchase Order directly skip P.R ?
Thanks !

Hi,
This is possible through PR only.
Tick the automatic PO and Source List fields in purchase view of the material master for the vendors on whom you would like to release PO automatically. Create a purchase info record. Create source list. In the last column in the details screen of the source list check the field relevant for MRP set the correct parameters for running MRP. But PO can not be created automatically after MRP run.
The automatic PO creation flag enables you to run a batch job that will convert all selected Purchase Requisitions to be converted Purchase Orders in the background.
You may consider scheduling agreements if you want MRP to kick out Purchase Orders. Set the flag in the source list for the scheduling agreement to "2" enabling MRP to kick out delivery schedules for future requirements. If you want to fix the schedule within a certain period you have two options.
1. Using firm zone - firms all orders within this period . Refer additional data screen of the scheduling agreement at the vendor material level.
2. Planning time - all new orders outside of the planning time fence - refer MRP 1 view of the material master
Above document i cpied from link <b>Arif Mansuri <b>New to Materials Management / Warehouse Management?</b></b>
Raghu

Return nothing when run Open Purchase order report(by Buyer)

We implement iPro/PO in Oracle. I finished the PO setup. But now user report that they are not able to generate any output for a particular Buyer when they run the Open Purchase Orders Report(by Buyer) report in the PO module. Even I leave the parameter wide open for the request, it also does not return any information.
Does it relate to the PO setting in system? Anyone can kindly guide me how to check such problem?

Hi Kyla,
PO raised by the buyer is 'STANDARD','BLANKET','PLANNED' ? What is the PO Status..? It should be "OPEN"..
Query used in this report is as below :
Query - Company
SELECT gsb.name c_company
, fsp.inventory_organization_id c_organization_id
, gsb.currency_code C_CURRENCY_BASE
, gsb.chart_of_accounts_id STRUCTURE_ACC
, mdv.structure_id STRUCTURE_CAT
, mdv.category_set_id c_category_set_id
, flo1.meaning c_yes
, flo2.meaning c_no
FROM gl_sets_of_books gsb
, financials_system_parameters fsp
, mtl_default_sets_view mdv
, fnd_lookups flo1
, fnd_lookups flo2
WHERE gsb.set_of_books_id = fsp.set_of_books_id
AND mdv.functional_area_id = 2
AND flo1.lookup_type = 'YES_NO'
AND flo1.lookup_code = 'Y'
AND flo2.lookup_type = 'YES_NO'
AND flo2.lookup_code = 'N'
Query - Buyer
SELECT distinct(pov.vendor_name||papf.full_name)
, papf.full_name Buyer
, pov.vendor_name Vendor
, pov.vendor_id
, papf. person_id employee_id
FROM PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F PAPF
, po_vendors pov
, po_headers poh
WHERE poh.agent_id = papf.person_id
AND poh.vendor_id = pov.vendor_id
AND poh.type_lookup_code in ('STANDARD','BLANKET','PLANNED')
AND nvl(poh.closed_code,'OPEN') NOT IN ('FINALLY CLOSED', 'CLOSED')
AND nvl(poh.cancel_flag,'N') = 'N'
/* AND papf.full_name = nvl(:P_buyer,papf.full_name) */
/* Bug#2453022 Commented out the above condition and replaced
it as follows as the user parameter P_Buyer will now return the id and not the name */
AND papf.person_id = nvl(:P_buyer,papf.person_id)
AND pov.vendor_name BETWEEN nvl(:P_vendor_from,pov.vendor_name)
AND nvl(:P_vendor_to,pov.vendor_name)
AND EXISTS (select 'x'
from po_lines pol
, po_line_locations pll
, po_releases por
where pol.po_header_id = poh.po_header_id
and pol.po_line_id = pll.po_line_id
and nvl(pll.closed_code,'OPEN') not in ('FINALLY CLOSED','CLOSED')
and nvl(pol.closed_code,'OPEN') not in ('FINALLY CLOSED','CLOSED')
and nvl(por.closed_code,'OPEN') not in ('FINALLY CLOSED','CLOSED')
and nvl(pll.cancel_flag,'N') = 'N'
and nvl(pol.cancel_flag,'N') = 'N'
and nvl(por.cancel_flag,'N') = 'N'
and pll.shipment_type in ('STANDARD','BLANKET','SCHEDULED')
and pll.po_release_id = por.po_release_id(+))
AND PAPF.EMPLOYEE_NUMBER IS NOT NULL
AND TRUNC(SYSDATE) BETWEEN PAPF.EFFECTIVE_START_DATE AND
PAPF.EFFECTIVE_END_DATE
AND DECODE(HR_SECURITY.VIEW_ALL ,'Y' , 'TRUE',
HR_SECURITY.SHOW_RECORD('PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F',PAPF.PERSON_ID,
PAPF.PERSON_TYPE_ID,
PAPF.EMPLOYEE_NUMBER,PAPF.APPLICANT_NUMBER )) = 'TRUE'
AND DECODE(HR_GENERAL.GET_XBG_PROFILE,'Y', PAPF.BUSINESS_GROUP_ID ,
HR_GENERAL.GET_BUSINESS_GROUP_ID) = PAPF.BUSINESS_GROUP_ID
ORDER BY papf.full_name
, pov.vendor_name
Query - PO
SELECT distinct(pol.line_num) Line
, poh.segment1 ||decode(por.release_num,null,'','-')|| por.release_num PO_Number_Release
, poh.currency_code C_CURRENCY
, plt.line_type Line_Type
, &P_FLEX_CAT C_FLEX_CAT
, &P_FLEX_ITEM C_FLEX_ITEM
, pol.item_revision Rev
, pol.item_description Description
, pol.po_header_id
, pol.po_line_id
, poh.vendor_id
, poh.agent_id
, psp.manual_po_num_type
, poh.segment1
, por.release_num
, nvl(por.po_release_id,-1) release_id
FROM po_line_locations pll
, mtl_system_items msi
, mtl_categories mca
, po_lines pol
, po_releases por
, po_headers poh
, po_line_types plt
, po_system_parameters psp
WHERE poh.po_header_id = pol.po_header_id
AND pol.po_line_id = pll.po_line_id
AND pll.po_release_id = por.po_release_id(+)
AND pol.line_type_id = plt.line_type_id
AND pol.item_id = msi.inventory_item_id(+)
AND msi.organization_id(+) = :c_organization_id
AND pol.category_id = mca.category_id
AND nvl(pll.closed_code,'OPEN') not in ('FINALLY CLOSED','CLOSED')
AND nvl(pol.closed_code,'OPEN') not in ('FINALLY CLOSED','CLOSED')
AND nvl(poh.closed_code,'OPEN') not in ('FINALLY CLOSED','CLOSED')
AND nvl(por.closed_code,'OPEN') not in ('FINALLY CLOSED','CLOSED')
AND nvl(pll.cancel_flag,'N') = 'N'
AND nvl(pol.cancel_flag,'N') = 'N'
AND nvl(poh.cancel_flag,'N') = 'N'
AND nvl(por.cancel_flag,'N') = 'N'
AND pll.shipment_type in ('STANDARD', 'BLANKET', 'SCHEDULED')
ORDER BY decode(psp.manual_po_num_type,'NUMERIC',
--bug#3614924
decode(rtrim(poh.segment1,'0123456789'),NULL,to_number(poh.segment1))
, null)
, decode(psp.manual_po_num_type,'NUMERIC',null, poh.segment1)
, por.release_num
, pol.line_num
Query - Shipment
SELECT pll.shipment_num Shipment
, nvl(pll.promised_date,pll.need_by_date) P_Date
, pol.unit_meas_lookup_code Unit
, DECODE (POL.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', PLL.amount,
'FIXED PRICE', PLL.amount,
PLL.quantity) Ordered
, DECODE (POL.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', PLL.amount_received,
'FIXED PRICE', PLL.amount_received,
PLL.quantity_received) Received
, DECODE (POL.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', PLL.amount_billed,
'FIXED PRICE', PLL.amount_billed,
PLL.quantity_billed) Billed
, pll.price_override Unit_Price
, DECODE (POL.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', (PLL.amount - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0))/
DECODE(NVL(PLL.amount, 0), 0, 1, PLL.amount),
'FIXED PRICE', (PLL.amount - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0))/
DECODE(NVL(PLL.amount, 0), 0, 1, PLL.amount),
(NVL(PLL.quantity, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0))/
DECODE (NVL(PLL.quantity, 0), 0, 1, PLL.quantity)) * 100 Percent_Due
, plc.displayed_field Open_For
, pll.po_line_id
, nvl(pll.po_release_id,-1) join_release_id
FROM po_line_locations pll
, po_lines pol
, po_lookup_codes plc
WHERE pol.po_line_id = pll.po_line_id
AND nvl(pll.closed_code,'OPEN') not in ('FINALLY CLOSED','CLOSED')
AND nvl(pol.closed_code,'OPEN') not in ('FINALLY CLOSED','CLOSED')
AND nvl(pll.cancel_flag,'N') = 'N'
AND nvl(pol.cancel_flag,'N') = 'N'
AND plc.lookup_type = 'DOCUMENT STATE'
AND plc.lookup_code = nvl(pll.closed_code, 'OPEN')
AND pll.shipment_type in ('STANDARD', 'BLANKET', 'SCHEDULED')
ORDER BY pll.shipment_num

How to run "Standard Purchase Order Stylesheet" in EBS

Hi again,
Please, anybody can give some clue for this?
In a r12 instance I have the "Standard Purchase Order Data Source" Data Definitio.
Related to this Data Definition there are 2 Templates
- Standard Purchase Order Stylesheet
- Standard Purchase Order Stylesheet with Logo
my question is... how and were in Oracle Applications (EBS) can I run this report?
where are defined the parameters?
I have searched in the concurrent programs, but I have not been able to find it?
Thanks and regards.
Juanje

The two purchase order stylesheets can be used by the "PO Output for Communication" (POXPOPDF) process found under the Purchasing Responsibilities.
To designate which template you want the "PO Output for Communication" process to use, you can select the template from Purchasing Super User Responsibility > Setup > Purchasing > Document Types. Then select the document type you want to change the template for (i.e. Standard PO) and change the template in the LOV.
This template is designed in the XSL-FO format, not RTF, so it is substantially more difficult to customize than normal XML Publisher templates unless you're proficient at working with code (it works a lot like HTML once you get used to it).
I suggest reading the white paper posted under note: 387670.1 at Metalink ("Oracle Purchasing Document Printing and Communication"). It is a decent document about how the Purchase Order PDF process works and how you can approach customizing the template if desired.
Also, these two (and many other) R12 templates do work in 11.5.10 if you upload them. However, I have not found any good reason to use the R12 template in this case over the 11.5.10 version. There is a lot of extra code specific to R12 functionality that just creates extra overhead (and no notable enhancements for 11i users).
Regards,
-Brian

MRP Run Against Sales order

Can you run MRP against a sales order , if so which tcode can i use to accomplish this.
Thank you

Did you try MD50?.
Reg
Samson

Not able to find the source requirement of MRP RUN-(for planned order)

Dear All,
Actullay In MRP run system is generating 10000 qty in planned order but in MD61 there is only 3000 qty and no sales order requirement also exists for the same. And when i rerun the MRP by choosing option 3 in planning mode, then also it is generating the planned order for 10000 qty only but Iam not able find out the base requirement for that. Kindly suggest me the solutions.
Regards,
Krishna

Hi
In MD04 at bottom, you can see a button for pegged requirement, click there you will come to know the list of requirement. It is not only because of Planned independent requirement you maintain in Md61, it could be due to lot size in Material master, or if you have fixed vendor in sourcelist then it could be because of Minimum order quantity with the vendor, or it could be safty stock or reorder point maintained in Material master
Regards
Antony

MRP run for sales order -- Collective requierements. how to correct?

Dear All,
Upon creation off a sales order we entered a material for which the avalability check was set to 01 collective requierements. So when the MRP run finished it created collective requirements. This was not our intention and we changed the availability check to 02 but now the MRP run doesn't pick it up anymore and the requirements remain collective.
Can we correct this in any way without recreating the sales order?
Best regards,
Michaë

its a MTO strategy
then
maintain 1- individual requirement in individual./collective requirement in MRP 4 view for the material
and rerun the MRP with planning mode 3( delete and recreate planning data)
then all the dependent requirement will be planned based on the sale order
Regards,
Sundaresan

Preventing MRP run if Sales order is blocked

Hi
Relating to SAP note 744484. Is it possible to setup a similar outcome but with
this dependant on the credit block.
In other words we wish to prevent MRP generating a planned order once the credit
block is active but allow planned orders to be generated once the block is removed. This is to cater for replenishment orders should losses occur.

please check this link.
<a href="http://sap-img.com/sap-sd/mrp-block.htm">MRP block</a>
regards

Mrp run without sales order

Hi Experts,
I am running the MRP for a particular material ,and the material contains some sales order. I dont want the mrp to consider the sales order.
I have made the changes in
Strategy group from 40 to 10 in MRP3 tab.
Schedule line from cp to cn in vov5.
But still its considering the sales orders.
so can anybody suggest me what changes i should do?
Thanks & Regards
Bhargavi desai

Bhargavi,
Change the schedule line category of the sales order schedule line to 'CN' in VA02 transaction and check.
Configuration changes do not change your earlier sales order data.
You always have option to selectively consider sales orders through BAdI implementation of MD_CHANGE_MRP_DATA method CHANGE_MDPSX_VBBE.
Best Regards,
Rajen

MRP run for sales orders

Dear Friends,
I want to run MRP based on the sales order delivery schedules. My sales orders are spread for the next 2 years.
For example for material A, I am having sales order for 40 quantity (item 10) and material B -20 quantity (item 20). My sales order delivery scedule is defined such away that each month I may required to send 4 items of material A and 2 items of material B starting from March 08.
In this case I need not to consider all the quantity. I want to run my MRP for which I need to deliver for the next 3 months period.
If you need any further clairification, please let me know.
Regards,
Surya.

Dear Surya,
Make sure that the scheduleline in the sales order are having 4 qty of A and 2 qty of B for each month as below
Schedule line of A
31.03.2008 - 4 qty
31.04.2008 - 4 qty
31.05.2008 - 4 qty
Schedule line of B
31.03.2008 - 2 qty
31.04.2008 - 2 qty
31.05.2008 - 2 qty
Make sue that your planning horizon is only one month. and you are running MRP with NETPL option.
This with consider the sales order line item schedulelisewise and give planned order only for one month.
i hope u got it

MRP - Purchase Order recommended

Hello,
Is it possible for MRP to recommend Purchase Orders to be created per warehouse(based on minimum inventory levels per warehouse). Currently, MRP recommends one Purchase Order with a total of the qty's across all the warehouses.
e.g. Warehouse A Min Qty = 5
Warehouse B Min Qty = 5
Warehouse C Min Qty = 5
MRP recommends one Purchase order, Qty 15 and for Warehouse A.
Thanks
Janice

Hi......
The only alternative would be to record the scene of the initial MRP to generate then all orders for a store, changing the numbers in the window of recommendations. Thus, in a second step, MRP run the wizard again to record the new scene will consider the remaining balances to successively make the process as many times as purchase orders from different stores there
I hope it will help
Best regards,

MRP area for running a sale order MRP

Hello PP experts,
I come across a scenario where , I need to do the MRP run for sale order in a MRP area. I have checked , I can put PIR with respect to MRP AREA , but when I open MD50 screen for running MRP for sale order. I did not found the MRP AREA
field in the screen.
In short , my question is , How the sale order MRP run , system will do in a MRP
area defined for the material ?
Here , I have already defined the material is MRP AREA and also I have created
MRP area segment in the material master.
I have also configured the MRP area in SPRO.
Waiting for your reply.
Regards,

Hello ,
Thanks for reply.
I am using plant MRP area. For FERT , I am using make to order strategy 20.
I want to specify the real problem. It is like below.
Suppose 'A ' is sumassembly goes to a variant configured MTO KMAT say 'V'.
The same 'A' subassembly is a child for a make to stock FERT say ' S'.
Presently using strtegy 11 for MTS fert 'S' and 10 for the subassembly ---'A'.
Now the planner want to plan for the subassembly.
He is putting the PIR for the subassembly as sales order is not availble and he is putting the PIR for FERT 'S'.
When sales order is coming then additinal quantity planning is happening.
So I suggested to use the strategy 70 for subassembly 'A' , so the sales order (of 'V') OF quantity will be offset for the PIR of the SUBASSEMBLY 'A'.
But the consumption of PIR of 'A' will be apllicable to MTS FERT that is 'S'.
So how can we prevent the system from offsetting the dependent requiremet triggered from the PIR of 'A'.
That means the consumption (that is the usage of stategy 70) of the FERT requirement should only work for ' A' and sales order based KMAT 'V'.
The same offseting should not work for subassembly 'A' and MTS FERT 'S'.
For for Make to order KAMT 'V' , if I use MRP area and do the sales order planning in MRP area. Will I get the desired result ?
Waiting for reply.
Regards,
Ravindra

MRP Run can not create Planned order to Sales order

Hi,
I have a problem with planning run to sales order. We have a configurable material which have make to order strategy. MRP Run does not create planned order to some of our sales order. I think it has relation with schedule lines but i can not understand the problem.
If schedule line has 1 as confirmed quantity MRP run can not plan but 0 as confirmed quantity MRP Run creates planned order. How can i solve this problem?
Regards,
techmastere

Hi,
Order for which qty is confirming, check which schedule line is determined and which requirement type system is determining.
then in VOV6 for schedule line tick mark availability check & Transfer of requirement
for requirement class OVZG tick mark availability check & Transfer of requirement
Note: if schedule line is not relevent for availability check & ToR then system always defaul confirm quantity.
kapil

MRP RUN ON PURCHASE ORDER

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for