MRP to ecxlude storage location stock and read only requirement

Hi All,
Below is the requirement for raw material,
Have two storage locations A and B.
For storage location A, MRP should exclude stock but has to consider demand's at A (dependent requirements, order reservations) and create MRP elements (purchase requisitions, scheduling agreements etc.).
SLOC B has to consider as normal for MRP (should read demand and stock as well).
Please suggest if it is doable, if yes; how to set the storage location A, so that it just read the demands but exclude stock.
Setting up only "SLOC Indicator" 1 in MRP 4 view is not the option I believe.
Thank you.

Can someone please suggest on below requirement,
How to make the settings at material level so that for a storage location 'A', MRP will just read/consider the demand but exclude the stock.
Is it feasible?
Regards,
Deepak Girme

Similar Messages

RLM MRP execution at storage location

Hello Friends,
Need help - I am configuring RLM with MRP - need help with below:
Requirement: I need to run MRP at the main storage location first (requirement is from Plant Maint order), followed by another MRP run at secondary storage locations. I want to deplete stock in the main storage location before using up stock at secondary storage locations.
This is not for re-order point planning (VB) for both storage locations, I know that I can plan MRP separately at storage location levels, but that only works with re-order point replenishment.
Is MRP area configuration my only option?
If possible I want to avoid MRP area configuration - I hear once it is configured we can revert back!

Hi Joe,
As per your client requirement, you need to run MRP at Main storage location, and want to avoid performing at storage location, here you can define the supply chain derivation via plant Mainteniance order by using using item category and transport requistion in RLM Configuration. you have option to select the order type order type item category ( ), item category change rule ...( newer change item category) & direct prourement type ( SAP Std ).
Yes MRP Area is the only option, the MRP first as plant level is the option, check in setting ie Step-3 Supply process derivation via plant ( supply type PD).
The parameters for the RLM Supply Process are a combination of the following:
· Material requirements planning (MRP) type at the requesting plant or storage location (the plant making the request for materials)
· MRP type at the supplying plant or storage location (the plant or storage location supplying the material)
· Special procurement type at the demanding plant or storage location.
For more information pls check this link..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/f4/7d3f9344af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_oil472/helpdata/en/83/496c3a411aab70e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
BR
Satish

During MRP run unwanted plant and storage location include and exclude

Hi There,
During MRP run how to include and exclude the unwanted plant and storage location pls let me know the required configuration settings.
Thanks in advance.

HI,
To control whether a particular storage location will be included or excluded from the MRP run. (MD02/MD41).
To exclude it from MRP run :-
OMIR - Define storage location MRP per plant
Put the MRP ind. as.         1 - storage location stock excluded for MRP
To include it from MRP run:-
OMIR - Define storage location MRP per plant
Put the MRP ind. as.      space - storage location stock also planned at plant level and save it
Next go to transaction MM01 - tick only view MRP 2
Key in Plant and Storage Location
Look at the Storage Location MRP section
change the SLoc MRP indicator to space and save it
MMD1 - Create MRP Profile - MRP profile is a useful entry aid and makes it easier to manage MRP data.
You define which fields are filled with values when MRP data is entered in the material master record, which of these values can be overwritten and which not.   You use the information stored in a profile is standard information that is needed again and again in similar constellations when material master records are maintained.
Regards
KK

Sales order stock and storage location stock on past date with value

Hi everyone.
I m looking for a report which can give sales order stock with value as it is shown in mb5b and storage location stock with value as in mc.5 is there any report which can give the combination of both the things on past date with values.

can you tell me what shall be the fields and table for special stock on past date with value and sloc stock on past date with value

Back Date Storage location Stock / Subcontractor Stock

Dear SAP Guru (s)
Please confirm can we get back date stock at storage location with value and quantity. Also tell me how can we take one subcontractor stock at any particular date.
We are using MB5B, but it is giving only quantity at storage location level and value at plant level.
Full points if problem solved.
Regards
Ishu

Execute MB5B with special stock and O for special stock indicator, and then double click the material number, you can get all the material document NO.

LTP excludes materials with MRP indicator of storage location

Hi All,
SAP Note 208017 explains the reason for LTP not taking into account the MRP
indicator of a storage location for a material. Has anyone tried a work around for this issue?
<b>We basically are looking for a snapshot of operative MRP a week back from current date</b> and I thought LTP can be used, but it plans at the plant stock level. Since we have service inventory managed at storage location level and its exculded in operative MRP, we cant have consistent results with LTP being used for my purpose.
Any inputs appreciated
Thanks

Hi,
1. I dont think we should use the LTP Forthe purpose of your requriement
2. Since i think you will be runing the MRP at certain frequency say daily,weekly etc
3. LTP is a strong functionality for the forward planning , which means for a medium or long term in the forward direction
4. For the purpose of snap shot we shouldnot use this ...
may be pp gurus in the forum will be giving us some reply which you are looking for
reg
dskumar

MRP Relevance for Storage Location

All SAP Gurus,
In SPRO where we need to maintain MRP Relevance for Storage Location?
Regards,

Dear,
Check transaction OMIR - Storage location - MRP relevance.
In detail:
To control whether a particular storage location will be included or excluded from the MRP run. (MD02/MD41).
To exclude it from MRP run follow the steps:-
OMIR - Define storage location MRP per plant
Put the MRP ind. as.         1 - storage location stock excluded for MRP
To include it from MRP run:-
OMIR - Define storage location MRP per plant
Put the MRP ind. as.      space - storage location stock also planned at plant level and save it
Next go to transaction MM01 - tick only view MRP 2
Key in Plant and Storage Location
Look at the Storage Location MRP section
change the SLoc MRP indicator to space and save it
MMD1 - Create MRP Profile - MRP profile is a useful entry aid and makes it easier to manage MRP data.
You define which fields are filled with values when MRP data is entered in the material master record, which of these values can be overwritten and which not.   You use the information stored in a profile is standard information that is needed again and again in similar constellations when material master records are maintained.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.
Edited by: Syed Hussain on Sep 20, 2008 12:51 PM

Storage location stocks

hi
Can anyone please help me with this? I am new to MM.
I created a raw material. Unrestricted-use of stock shows :0.
Storage location stock for current period shows all 0s. Where can i enter the stock values for this material.
Thanks
Madhu

Hello Madhu,
Stock value is calculated based on the material price and total stock quantity. In your case you just created Material Master record, so it will not show up the stock value unless you put some the stock in your valuation area (Plant).
There are two ways to get this stock value.
1. Manually upload the inital stock using MB1C / MIGO using mvt type 561, give the external value in local currency (On Qty tab) else price will be taken from material master record.
2. Receive the material with or without purchase order (mvt type 101/501).
1. Create purchase order (ME21N)
2. Crete Goods Receipt (MIGO)
After any of the above option, the stock value will showup in the material master record.
Hope this will help.
Regards
Arif Mansuri
Reward if answer is helpful.

Storage location stock with value on a particular date

i m in search of a report or logic which can fetch stock as in mb5b on a particular date. mb5b shows sloc stock but without value and show valuated stock without sloc. can anyone help me out to find such report or give some logic or table from where it can fetch sloc stock with value.
Edited by: Husain Husain on Jan 28, 2010 4:00 PM

Hi,
All the stock related reports like MC.1,MC.5,MCBA etc will give you stock for a particular months range. he only report giving stock on a date is MB5B .However in this report you will not get the storage location stock value.
Now try the report in T Code J3RFLVMOBVED which will serve your purpose .Here in the material parameter tab give your storage location and the date range in the main tab Posting date range and than execute.
Dhruba

How to run MRP on different storage location level ?

Dear Experts,
Need your valuable guidance to solve the below requirement form the client-
1) My client want to enter a "safety stock level" for one spare part/ Material on the basis of individual storage locations.
           For sake of example: in SL01 he wants the safety stock for particular material set to 5
                              In FS18 he wants the safety stock set to 2
                              In FS15 he wants the safety stock set to 1
Kindly tell me whether it is possible? & guide me how to do it.
2) Also tell me how to run MRP on a storage location level?
           This is because after maintaining different safety stocks for one material in different storage locations, is it possible to appear each storage location with their differing safety stock levels?
I checked the MRP type maintained & its-1 (plant) & not as- 2 (storage location).
Kindly guide me for the above issue
Thanks in advance for your support.
Regards,
Mehul

Hi Umashanker,
Thanks for your suggession . Accordingly I have resolved the issue.
Regards,
Mehul

Help required -for MRP Run at storage location level

Hi ,
we need to have separate MRP fro two storage locations with direct procurement from Storage locations. Right now we have MRP run at Plant level for all the storage locations. we donot want the materials in these two storage locations to be planned at Plant level only with Separate storage locations. Plant level MRP will run for the other storage locations .
I have created separate MRP areas for the storage locations & activated MRP for MRP Areas client level. material masters for the two storage locations have been asigned the MRP areas & maintained the MRP area data in material master .
When we run the MD01, the Planned orders are getting created at both MRP areas plus at the Plant level.we donot want the planned orders creation at Plant MRP area level-only at the storage location level for those two storage locations MRP areas.
Can anybody guide me -how to achieve that ? Did we miss any configuration?
I tried to maintain scope of planning & getting error for parallel processing .
Do i need to maintain parallel procesing with servers ?
Pls need your input on this. Any help will be highly appreciated .
   Thank you in advance.
    Regards,
    Krish.

Hi,
     Go to IMG settings 'Materials Management + Consumption-Based Planning + Planning + Define Storage Location MRP per Plant' Enter your Plant, It will show list of storage location in that Plant, then select 2 in 'MRP Indicator' field for storage location for which u want to plan seperately.
Hope It will clear Your Problem
Regards
Sunil Kumar

Crashes and read-only file systems

Notice: I apolgize for the long post, I've tried to be as thorough as possible. I have searched everywhere for possible solutions, but things I've found end up being temporary workarounds or don't apply to my situation. Any help, even as simple as, "have you checked out XYZ log, it's hidden here", would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
I'm not sure what exactly caused the issues below, but they did start to happen within a day of running pacman -Syu. I hadn't run that since I first installed Arch on December 2nd of this year.
Setup:
Thinkpad 2436CTO
UEFI/GPT
SSD drive
Partitions: UEFISYS, Boot, LVM
The LVM is encrypted and is broken up as: /root, /var, /usr, /tmp, /home
All LVM file systems are EXT4 (used to have /var and /tmp as ReiserFS)
The first sign that something was wrong was gnome freezing. Gnome would then crash and I'd get booted back to the shell with all filesystems mounted as read-only. I started having the same issues as this OP:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=150704
At the time, I had /var and /tmp as ReiserFS, and would also get reiserfs_read_locked_inode errors.
When shutting down (even during non-crashed sessions) I would notice this during shutdown:
Failed unmounting /var
Failed unmounting /usr
Followed by a ton of these:
device-mapper: remove ioctl on <my LVM group> failed: Device or resource busy
Nother of these errors had ever appeared before.
After hours of looking for solutions (and not finding any that worked) I was convinced (without any proof) that my Reiser file systems were corrupt and so I reformatted my entire SSD and started anew - not the Arch way, I know I set all logical volumes as EXT4.
After started anew, I noticed
device-mapper: remove ioctl on LVM_SysGroup failed: Device or resource busy
was still showing up, even with just a stock Arch setup (maybe even when powering off via Arch install ISO, don't remember). After a lot of searching, I found that most people judged it a harmless error, so I ignored it and continued setting up Arch.
I set up Gnome and a basic LAMP server, and everything seemed to work for a couple of hours. Soon after, I got the same old issues back. The System-journald issue came back and per the workaround on https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=150704 and a couple other places, I rotated the journals and stopped journald from saving to storage. That seemed to stop THOSE errors from at least overwhelming the shell, but I would still get screen freezes, crashes, and read-only file systems.
I had to force the laptop to power off, since poweroff/reboot/halt commands weren't working (would get errors regarding the filesystems mounted as read-only).
I utilized all disk checking functions possible. From running the tests (SMART test included) that came as part of my laptop's BIOS to full blown fsck. All tests showed the drive was working fine, and Fsck would show everything was either clean, or
Clearing orphaned inode ## (uid=89, gid=89, mode=0100600, size=###
Free blocks count wrong (###, counted=###)
Which I would opt to fix. Nothing serious, though.
I could safely boot back into Arch and use the system fine until the system decides to freeze/crash and do the above all over again.
The sure way of recreating this for me is to run a cron job on a local site I'm developing. After a brief screen freeze (mouse still moveable but everything is otherwise unreponsive) I'll systemctl status mysqld.service and notice that mysqld went down.
It seems that it's at this point my file systems are mounted as read only, as trying to do virtually anything results in:
unable to open /var/db/sudo/...: Read-only file system
After some time, X/Gnome crashes and I get sent back to shell with
ERROR: file_stream_metrics.cc(37)
RecordFileError() err = 30 source = 1 record = 0
Server terminated successfully (0)
Closing log file.or_delegate.h(30)] sqlite erro1, errno 0: SQL logic error or missing database[1157:1179
rm: cannot remove '/tmp/serverauth.teuroEBhtl': Read-only file system
Before all this happened, I was using Arch just fine for a few weeks. I wiped the drives and started anew, and this still happens with just the minimal number of packages installed.
I've searched for solutions to each individual problem, but come across a hack that doesn't solve anything (like turning off storing logs for journal), or the solution doesn't apply to my case.
At this point, I'm so overwhelmed I'm not even sure where exactly to pick up figuring this issue out.
Thanks in advance for any help

Did this occur when you booted from the live/install media?
What is your current set up? That is, partitions, filesystems etc. I take it you have not yet reinstalled X but are in the default CLI following installation?
If turning off log storage didn't help, reenable it so that you may at least stand a chance of finding something useful.
What services, if any, are you running? What non-default daemons etc.?
Does it happen if you keep the machine off line?
Have you done pacman -Syu since installation and dealt with any *.pacnew files?
Last edited by cfr (2012-12-26 22:17:57)

How to use same view as editable and read only in ADF

Hi,
how to use same view as editable and read only in ADF ?? How can we achieve this in TF's ???
-mrudul

Hi,
Steven Davelaar wrote a presentation about this "Building Highly Reusable Taskflows"
Starting slide 14 is where your use case comes into play
Frank

Missing "illustrations" tab and read-only information

After a Windows XP Home repair, no illustration tab and read-only information by new music downloads. Have most recent itunes. Can someone help me...please?

Thanks Gilad, In that case, is there then a way (via a script) that if I leave field 2 as not readonly, so the cursor moves into this field on tab out of field one, that I can reject any input from the user, if field one does not contain any data ? I thought this might be a solution. I have the script with the If Else statement, that sets the value of field 2 to "", if the value of field 1 is also "", but what is the else statement required to accept the value, if the content of field 1 is not "" ?.
The script preoduces an error, if field 1 is blank, and I try to enter data into field 2 and then tab out of field.

Possible to make an item editable for certain users and read only for other

Is it possible to make an item editable for certain users and read only for others?
I've been able to accomplish this by taken the select statement that I used to define an authorization scheme, placing it in the Read Only condition of the item. However, I would like to simply reference the authorization scheme to utilize caching, and to help keep things cleaner for future maintenance.
Is it possible to reference an authorization scheme in an item condition similar to the way another item can be referenced by preceding it with a colon (i.e. :P1_First_Name)?

Thank you, your suggestion worked.
It would be nice on a future release of APEX if a drop-down box existed under the Ready Only section that would allow an existing Authorization Scheme to be selected or negated when applying the Read Only attribute to a form item.

MRP to ecxlude storage location stock and read only requirement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for