MRSS issue in work order.

Hi all,
i have need your help to solve the below mentioned issue.
Right now i am doing a sap upgradation. in the part of testing i executed the iw31 tcode. afte entering all the data the i just saved it.
while saving the order the warning came like" MRSS SAPLRSG_PM_ORDER" .
can anyone have any idea about it kindly help.
Siva-V

Hello
Please check SAP Note-1350600
Br
Rakesh

Similar Messages

  • How to block material issue to work order

    Dear Expert,
    How do block material issue to work order when the item have been flag for deletion in MM module and have also been block for procurement and inventory in mm module.
    Please help

    Hi,
    Thank you for the prompt reply, what you mean by the Standard SAP? can you provide the reference link? I am facing the problem that the item material have been flag for deletion and been block for procurement and inventory in MM module material master data however it still able to material issue to work order. Any ideal how to block the material issue to work order when the material item have been flag for deletion and block for movement in MM material.
    Please help.

  • Goods Issue against Work Order assigned to WBS - Report

    We are doing Goods Issue against Work Order with movement 261, the data picked up from work order is not including
    the WBS element mentioned on the work order. Through this WBS element report is created through MB51, with total receipts, total issues, transfer postings etc made against WBS element, but without WBS element No. in material document,
    we cannot pull this report through MB51, as we see material document No.created against work order but not the WBS
    No. there, so this report cannot be pulled from MB51 through WBS element.
    Does anyone know of any other report that I can pull From WBS No. as all these material documents are hitting WBS with
    total receipts, total issues, transfer postings against the said WBS mentioned in the work order.
    Doing Good issue against WBS is no problem, as the material document saves the WBS No.

    >
    Justin zhang wrote:
    > 1. Try to see CN52N whether meet your business requirments
    >
    > 2. I use two steps approach investigating material documents for project WBS element:
    >
    >     a.  use IW39 list the work orders by selection criteria of WBS (this is PM order list).
    >     b.  use SAP std. ALV copy functions and past work order numbers into MB51selection criteria
    >
    >
    > I'm interested in std. t-codes if others can provide. Thanks.
    >
    > Edited by: Justin zhang on May 19, 2010 10:17 AM
    Thanks Justin, your IW39 solution worked, as it has posting date selection defined there
    which I cant find in CN52N. My solution was take details from MB51, then pull report IW39 within
    posting dates and then export the WBS elements against work order to excel and then copy
    the WBS elements in the MB51 report created.

  • Budget Exceed Issue in work Order (P.O) in Production Server.

    Hi Friends,
    I am getting different type of budget exceed issue, that to only in Production server.
    Here the issue is when I am creating the work order P.O (Acc.As. Cat.P, Itm Cat. D) with different service line items with respective WBSe with in the budget limit, then I am doing SES for some quantity, now when I am changing (I am decreasing not increasing) the same P.O line item available quantity and creating the new version now system is calculating the old version line item quantity + new version quantity (nothing but double) then giving budget exceed error.
    One more strange thing is, if I change quantity for one line item then system is giving budget exceed error for another line item which is having the different WBSe which was saved with out giving any error at the time of P.O creation.
    This issue is happening only in Production server ....same scenario I have run with the same values in both Dev. and Qau. (Where the config. is same in all 3 clients) but in both the clients it is working fine...but in production why the system is behaving in such a way I am not getting. 
    In the below I have given the test scenario...
    Service P.O Creation
    Line Item
    P.O Quanity
    Value
    WBS
    Budget
    Commitment
    SES. Quatity
    Actual cost
    1
    10
    100
    WBS 1
    2000
    1000
    5
    500
    2
    20
    200
    Wbs 2
    4000
    2000
    10.00
    1000
    3
    30
    300
    WBS 3
    6000
    3000
    15
    1500
    4
    40
    400
    Wbs 4
    8000
    4000
    20.00
    2000
    Service P.O change with new version
    Line Item
    P.O Quanity
    Value
    WBS
    Budget
    Commitment
    SES. Quatity
    Actual cost
    1
    6
    100
    WBS 1
    1000
    1000
    5
    500
    2
    20
    200
    Wbs 2
    2000
    2000
    10.00
    1000
    Budget exceed with the double value
    3
    30
    300
    WBS 3
    3000
    3000
    15
    1500
    4
    40
    400
    Wbs 4
    4000
    4000
    20.00
    2000
    If any one has come across with this type of issue and solved ...please suggest me ..
    Regards,
    Srikanth

    Hi,
    I have face similar issue in deleting PO line items.
    Even though I delete items, system check budget for deleted qty with the currency conversion + value & gives budget exceed error.
    In some cases we have asked user to deactivated AVAC asked to do the transaction, which is not recommended.
    You can try running CJBN & CJBV in sequence for affected WBS.
    Thanks & reg,
    Sam

  • Work Order - Maintenance Planning plant change

    Hi Gurus,
    Is there any way to change the maintenance planning plant in a created work order? We are having an issue on work orders and we need to tranfer our open work orders to another plants to solved the issue. Please me let me know if this is possible to do in SAP. And let me know how to do it in SAP.
    Thanks in advance,

    Hi,
    The start of the plan is not option as this will surely have an impact. Anyway, work around for this issue was provided and this is OK now. We will continue with the old orders untill such time they will finally be closed. No postings will be created against this old orders and if there's a need to do GR new orders will be created in new plants for the postings.
    Thanks for you help,

  • Best practice - over issue of move orders in WIP

    Hi Business analyst guru's,
    I am working for a electronics manufacturing industry. I am trying to use work orders functionality across our organizations. I am stuck with a logic. Please advise me what you do in this scenario.
    BoM : I have a a board assembly which requires 10 components say one of each component on BoM.
    Setups:
    all component's WIP supply type is push, Supply subinventory blank for all BoM components
    Release backflush components is not enabled in WIP parameters.
    one fine day I want to build 100 board assemblies and created the work order for 100, and released the move order through compoentn pick release form with transaction type as WIP component issue.
    Now the warehouse picker went into warehouse to pick 100 of each component with a move order with 10 lines on it. 2 components are in reels which he can not split the reel and split reel can not be used in production floor (reel size is 1000). He can issue 1000 against on the move order
    Now all the material went into production and build the assembly by 100 units. But two reels are left over with 900 of each. here I can do a WIP component return against the job.
    But expectation is if I want to build another work order (say qty by 100 again) this 900 of two components should be available for the next work order. If I do component pick release, the move order should request only 8 components.
    Is this possible? If not what is the best practice to avoid WIP return transaction and avoid splitting the reel size?
    Thanks
    Veerakumar

    1) If you have these items as Push, you will get a move order line for 100. Therefore, even if you move a whole reel the floor, only 100 will get transacted out of warehouse. Someone will have to manually transact additional 900 to the floor otherwise your inventory accuracy will go for a toss.
    Have you considered making those items pull?
    1) As and when the worker needs reel, he raises a signal. (different ways of doing this - could be Oracle kanban, could be a visual signal, could be a holler - whatever works for you)
    2) You transfer 1000 to the fllor
    3) As and when jobs complete, the 100 units get issued to work order
    4) Whatever is left over (say 800 after the 2 work orders) and not needed is transferred back to warehouse and you do a subinv xfer transaction.
    2) If you can't make them pull, then you will be forced to move the 900 back to warehouse when the first job is done.
    3) If you can't make them pull, you do a component pick release (CPR) for multiple jobs at a time? You can group your pick tickets by destination operation. This way, upon component release, you will have 1 move order line with qty =200. The picker transacts the move order line for 200 and a subinv xfer to WIP for 800.
    4) Here is the best case scenario. Don't know if your floor layout or factory processes will support this.
    You make the items pull on BOM. You have a temporary holding area on the floor (aka supermarket) . When operator needs the item, a visual signal is raised. The supervisor (aka spider) checks the supermarket and brings a reel to the operator. Upon completing the job(s), whatever is left of the reel goes to the supermarket. Once the reel is no more needed for the day (or week or month), you do a subinv xfer from supermarket to warehouse of whatever is left. The components get issued to work order upon completion (of operation/assembly).
    Do the best you can out of this scenario. :)
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • GI Consignment item in work order

    Hi,
    When issue a work order with consignment item, we will need to identify which vendor to select.
    But what should we do if one vendor didn't has sufficient stock on hand?
    Is it possible to select 2nd vendor in one WO issue operation, to avoid another WO makes the GI as unplanned issue status.
    regards,
    Steven

    Hi King Fischer,
    After you have released an Order, if you delete a Component or an Operation with Component and saved. You cannot re-set the deteltion Indicator.
    By going to the path Edit --> Deletions --> On/Off. You can only see deleted entries but cannot re-set the same.
    If you want, please input the line again.
    Also please refer my post on the same previously
    Re-Activation of Deleted Operations / Components in Maintenance Orders
    Regards,
    MLN Prasad

  • Cost Centers for Work Orders

    HI Guru's,
    I have an issue with work orders for our maintenance team. The orders are being settled to the incorrect cost center.  I believe this is happening because they have not been set up correctly.  Please can you tell me if there a way to transfer these into the correct cost center?  and how can I change the set up on these work orders?
    Please can you help.
    Best Regards,
    Yasmeen

    It sounds like you need to change the settlement rule on the work orders so they settle to the correct cost center.  Go to IW32 -> Goto->Settlement rule
    To move previous postings, you can do an CO only reposting using transaction KB11 to move CO postings to the correct cost object.
    Good luck!
    Tammy

  • PR on work order

    Hi gurus,
    Currently the i have set my work order as Collective PR.
    The problem is there are time that the PR was already converted into PO and i input a new non stock item to the work order the system includes it in the old PR number.
    What the business want is when the PR is already converted into PO and a new component was included in the work order this should trigger a new PR number.
    How can i configure this.
    Thank you so much!

    Hi,
    I think that user exits are used for having different Purchasing Doc Types.
    The issue is: Work order does not generate a new PR number if there is an existing PR on the work order. Instead it opens the released PR and adds a line to it.. What the business wants is a new PR number if the old PR number is already converted into PO.
    Thanks!

  • Work Order Issue - Error Creating Goods Delivery,Goods Issue or GRPO

    We use SAP Business One 2007 A PL:08. We have an add-on for the work orders and While putting the work order from released to completion, a user is getting an error message that says:
    "Error Creating Delivery,Goods Issue or Goods receipt PO- Error Issuing Delivery Note -Item no. is missing [DLN1.Itemcode][Line:3]"
    I do not see any item missing in the work order and all the posting periods are open. I have checked all possible settings!!
    Any idea what this could be?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Is it your add-on or a 3rd party add-on?
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Issue during automatic Creation of Work Order from Notification

    Hi,
    I have a issue during automatic Creation of Work Order from Notification.
    BADI implemented: NOTIF_EVENT_POST
    BAPI called in BADI: BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN
    I am able to create Work Order successfully but after that i need to update notification header with created work order number.
    But i am unable to update the same (VIQMEL-AUFNR).
    Can anybody provide solution for the same!
    Thanks,
    Kumar.

    Hi,
    Any inputs on above posted issue!
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Kumar.

  • Goos  issue through MIGO based on work order problems

    Hi All,
    Can any one guide me how to overcome the error"Purchasinh Info record not found in purchasing organisation 2434" while doing Goods(consignment materials) Issue through MIGO transaction based on work order. How to create the Purchase Info record??
    Any pointer from any side  will be highly appreciable...thanks in Advance
    Regards
    Azizur

    Dear Azis,
             Double Click on the serial no of the Component you will get the  inforecord fieldin the Purchasing tab. But this is only for Stock Materials.
    Please recheck again your components.
    Regards,
    Shareeq
    Edited by: K M AHAMED SHAREEQ HUSSAIN on Oct 13, 2009 2:42 PM

  • Goods return against maintenance work order exceeds goods issue

    Is there a way to prevent returning more quantity (262 movement type done within MB1A) than was issued (261 movement type done within MIGO_GI) against a maintenance work order component?
    Thanks in advance,
    Rick

    Hi,
    Movement Types 261 and 262 works in Planned as well as in Unplanned both ways.
    If you do Goods Issue w.r.t. Maintenance/Work Order (Movement Type - 261) then components and their quantity get defaulted from the reservation created automatically during order creation and system does not allow us to issue more that the quantity in reservation.
    Similarly when you cancel the Goods Issue Document then it hits Movement Type 262 automatically and does not allow to edit the quantity.
    The above two processes are planned ways.
    Now when you want to do extra consumption of components against Maintenance/Work Order then you do not do Goods Issue > Order, instead of this you do Goods Issue > Others and then specify all the necessary details manually (Like; material, quantity, etc...) and enter Maintenance/Work Order as an Account Assignment on which the cost is getting loaded.
    Similarly when you are receiving materials from Maintenance/Work Order using option Goods Receipt > Others then here also there is no control and you can receive any quantity from Maintenance/Work Order since here also Maintenance/Work Order is working as an account assignment not a control document.
    The above two processes are unplanned ways.
    So in short, there is not any control on this movement when it is unplanned.

  • Issue with a work order

    Hi Team,
    I am having an issue with the work order having multiple line items for the same component. Out of all line items it is showing error for two line items mentioning,
    No status object available for CMP 81411471 0160 0110
    Double clicked on it msg no displayed BS.001
    Please help on this issue, Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Nivas

    Are you using Work Clearance Management?? Please provide the detailed error message, if any.
    67826 - Restoring the status for orders RIORDST1
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/3209398
    Check the above details.

  • Issue with Cost center in PO and Work Order

    Dear Expert,
    I am facing an issue with respect to cost center in Purchase Order and Work Order. The PO is made against a work order. There are two cost center associated with the work order. One is updated under u201CAdditional datau201D field and other is at u201Clocationu201D . So the cost center in PO should essentially be the same one mentioned under u2018locationu2019 field of work order. So the issue here is that while creating PO, the cost center is picked from the u201Cadditional datau201D field of work order not from u2018locationu2019 field of WO.
    Is there any exit available that needs to be implemented for overriding the cost center in PO or any other way of solving this problem?
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks
    Deba

    Hi,
    I guess that there is already some user exit or enhancement in place, since this doesn't sound like standard SAP (picking the cost data from additional data, or even having it there).
    Mario

Maybe you are looking for