MRTG Out Greater than In

Hello Net Pros,
I have configured a MRTG system to give me the traffic analysis of my AS5350 Gateway's serial WAN Interface. Now in my graph the "Current In" value displayed is always smaller than the "Current Out". The same is for "Average" and "Max" values. Also I have configured the codec "g729r8" and all the originating calls coming in from our carriers to our terminating gateway [AS5350] are using this codec. If I multiply the "Number of DS0s in Use" with the average bandwidth consumed by one call using "g729r8" i.e. 12.8 kbps then this calculated value never matches the traffic analysis shown for the serial WAN interface. We had access-lists on the AS5350 Gateway. We tried removing the access-lists, but no improvement. Still the same result. What I am not able to understand is a] why my Out is always greater than my In and b] why the values shown in the traffic analysis for the serial WAN interface never match the value for the total bandwidth consumed by the active calls [using codec g729r8].
Could someone try to help me diagnose this problem??
Rushabh

hi Rushabh
i have same problem on my MRTG
but 1st of all the codec g729 is around 20 to 22k
so if u do the math the bandwidth calculation will be ok
now for the up is greater than the down this is due to codec so dont worry ,try to change the codec and u will see the change
this is nothing to be worried about
realy u dont have any problem
Fadi

Similar Messages

Cant work out greater than date .. help plz

Hi,
Can any one tell me why this TRUNC (SYSDATE)+ (rmt.sys_time_mon - TO_DATE ('01-JAN-1900', 'DD-MON-YYYY')) is not working.
If i run it seperately it gives me the appropriate value. This is a date value for example the date i have is 30/12/1899 1:00:00 AM.
Please help..
SELECT DPN.PAS_NAME,
     PPC.PROCESS_DES_CODE,
     MIN(decode(FCD.SOURCE_FILE_NAME, NULL, 'N', 'Y')),
     MIN(PCD.END_PROCESS_CONTROL_TSTP)
FROM DWCNTL_PAS_FILES_CODE PFC LEFT OUTER JOIN
DWCNTL_IFACE_FILE_CONTROL FCD ON SUBSTR(FCD.SOURCE_FILE_NAME, 1,7) = PFC.FILE_NAME AND TRUNC(FCD.CREATE_TSTP) =trunc(sysdate),
DWCNTL_PAS_NAME DPN JOIN
DWCNTL_PAS_PROCESS_CODE PPC ON PPC.PAS_ID = DPN.PAS_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN
DWCNTL_PROCESS_CONTROL PCD ON PCD.PROCESS_CODE = PPC.PROCESS_CODE AND trunc(PCD.END_PROCESS_CONTROL_TSTP) > TRUNC (SYSDATE)+ (rmt.sys_time_mon - TO_DATE ('01-JAN-1900', 'DD-MON-YYYY')) JOIN
SLA SLA ON SLA.PAS_ID = DPN.PAS_ID,
PROCESS_START PST ,
REPORT_COMMENTS RPT,
EDWAPPS_TIME RMT
WHERE PFC.FILE_NAME LIKE 'U2%'
AND DPN.PAS_NAME LIKE 'U2'
AND PFC.PROCESS_CODE = PPC.PROCESS_CODE
AND PPC.PROCESS_DES_CODE LIKE 'CONTRACT'
GROUP BY PPC.PROCESS_DES_CODE, DPN.PAS_NAME,PCD.END_PROCESS_CONTROL_TSTP

SELECT dpn.pas_name,
ppc.process_des_code,
MIN(decode(fcd.source_file_name, NULL, 'N', 'Y')),
MIN(pcd.end_process_control_tstp)
FROM dwcntl_pas_files_code pfc
     LEFT OUTER JOIN dwcntl_iface_file_control fcd
          ON SUBSTR(fcd.source_file_name, 1, 7) = pfc.file_name
          AND TRUNC(fcd.create_tstp) = TRUNC(sysdate),
dwcntl_pas_name dpn
JOIN dwcntl_pas_process_code ppc
ON ppc.pas_id = dpn.pas_id
LEFT OUTER JOIN dwcntl_process_control pcd
ON pcd.process_code = ppc.process_code
AND TRUNC(pcd.end_process_control_tstp) >
TRUNC(sysdate) + (rmt.sys_time_mon-to_date('01-JAN-1900','DD-MON-YYYY'))
     JOIN sla sla ON sla.pas_id = dpn.pas_id,
     process_start pst,
     report_comments rpt,
     edwapps_time rmt
WHERE pfc.file_name LIKE 'U2%'
AND dpn.pas_name LIKE 'U2'
AND pfc.process_code = ppc.process_code
AND ppc.process_des_code LIKE 'CONTRACT'
GROUP BY ppc.process_des_code,
dpn.pas_name,
pcd.end_process_control_tstpsomething wrong with your query, you are trying to left join dwcntl_pas_process_code ppc with dwcntl_process_control pcd that why oracle give error 904 because no rmt alias in that join.

About JDBC CALL STORE PROCEDURE with out parameter is greater than 4000

Hi Guys,
I have a problem call store procedure with a large string.
as i know varchar2 can contain 32767 characters in pl/sql .
But when i used varchar2 as a out parameter in a store procedure, if the out parameter is greater than 4000 characters , it always give me error message as 'the buffer is too small'.
why it happened?
I read some article that says i need configure a property in data-source.xml , and jdbc 10g driver already solved this problem, but i used jdev 10.1.3.2 ,the driver should be fine.
How can i solve this problem?
Thanks in advance,
AppCat

Object is Foundation, Execute Script
This is for a query, you can change to a stored procedure call. Pull the value back in the Java code then put into the process variable.
import javax.naming.InitialContext;
import javax.sql.DataSource;
import java.sql.*;
PreparedStatement stmt = null;
Connection conn = null;
ResultSet rs = null;
try {
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
DataSource ds = (DataSource) ctx.lookup("java:IDP_DS");
conn = ds.getConnection();
stmt = conn.prepareStatement("select FUBAR from TB_PT_FUBAR where PROCESS_INSTANCE_ID=?");
stmt.setLong(1, patExecContext.getProcessDataLongValue("/process_data/@inputID"));
rs = stmt.executeQuery();
rs.next();
patExecContext.setProcessDataStringValue("/process_data/outData", rs.getString(1));
} finally {
try {
rs.close();
} catch (Exception rse) {}
try {
stmt.close();
} catch (Exception sse) {}
try {
conn.close();
} catch (Exception cse) {}

Exchange 2010 SP2 RU2 - Indexing backlog reached a critical limit of 48 hours or the number of items in the retry queue is greater than 10000 for one or more databases

We have been getting intermittent SCOM alarms for our Exchange 2010 MBX server citing "Indexing backlog reached a critical limit of 48 hours or the number of items in the retry queue is greater than 10000 for one or more databases"
I see events in EventViewer that SCOM is triggering on, but not whats generating the events or how else to test for them.
    get-eventlog -computername SERVERNAME -logname "Application" -after "03/14/2013" | ?{$_.eventid -eq "5604"} | select MachineName,EventID,EntryType,Message | ft -autosize
One MS Forum post online says it is a bug in RU4, unclear if it may also be a bug in RU2 (our installed version).
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchangesvradmin/thread/9dcb3011-9327-4935-9479-62b38a6ddd87
    "I was looking for the same error and found this.. it basically says that this is a bug in RU4 and RU4-v2...and it needs to be removed."
tests using troubleshooting scripts find no issues with search indexer,
    [PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts>.\Troubleshoot-CI.ps1
    Get-EventLog : No matches found
    At C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts\CITSLibrary.ps1:622 char:40
    + $msftesqlCrashes = get-eventlog <<<< -computername $Server -after $StartTime -logname "Application" -source $msftesqlServiceName | where {$_.eventId
    -eq $msftesqlCrashEventId}
        + CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (:) [Get-EventLog], ArgumentException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : GetEventLogNoEntriesFound,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.GetEventLogCommand
    Name IsDeadLocked CatalogStatusArray
    SERVERNAME False {DATABASENAME\SERVERNAME, DATABASENAME\S...
    [PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts>
and tests against searches on each DB themselves show no issues and respond typically within 3 seconds.
    [PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts>Test-ExchangeSearch | ft Server, Database, ServerGuid, ResultFound, SearchTimeInSeconds, Error -AutoSize
    Server Database ServerGuid ResultFound SearchTimeInSeconds Error
    SERVERNAME DATABASENAME b16e3461-257c-40dd-a9ad-99a5f41a927e True 2.937
I also tried to check the Performance Viewer for the MSExchange Search Indexer and MXExchange Search Indices but am unsure which of the many metrics would indicate this issue.
We have had no reports of search issues from our users and have been unable to duplicate any impairment in our testing.
Does anyone else have any suggestions for tests to check or steps to take on this alert? Is it simply a false alarm or a timeout of other sorts during testing? We have 80 DAGs on this server (as well as all our servers, some of which have also reported the
same alert) and the Test-ExchangeSearch command times out before completely testing all DAGs.

Hi IAMChrisL,
Any updates?
Frank Wang
TechNet Community Support

Auto adjustment of page orientation causes printing issues with documents that have a page width greater than its page height.

Hi,
Since an upgrade from Word 2003 to Word 2010, we are experiencing printing issues with certain
documents that have a page width greater than its page height.
In Word 2003, it was no problem to set the page width greater than the page height while setting the page orientation to "portrait".
In Word 2010, this seems impossible: despite leaving the page orientation to "portrait", if one changes the page width/height as stated,
Word 2010 automatically adjusts the orientation to "landscape". Resetting the orientation to "portrait" will flip the page's width/heigth settings.
This behaviour causes printing problems: the page prints out 90° rotated.
I do not believe this is a printer driver issue: I tried several different printer drivers, and all give the same (bad) result. Setting the printer driver's page orientation settings (before printing) makes no difference, as
Word 2010 seems to force the page orientation settings.
Inserting the documents 90° rotated is not an option, since it causes problems with the printing margins.
This is very annoying, since we have to print official documents of a municipality (driver's licences).
Is there a workaround for this issue?
Regards,
Laurent Grandgaignage
Sysadmin Gemeentebestuur Stabroek, Belgium

Hi
Thank you for using
Microsoft Office for IT Professionals Forums.
From your description, we can follow these steps to test this issue
Step 1: Repair Office 2010
1.
Click
Start, and then click Control Panel.
2.
Click
Programs and Features.
3.
Click the
Office 2010 program that you want to repair, and then click
Change.
4.
Click
Repair, and then click Continue. You might need to restart your computer after the repair is complete.
Step 2:
Rename the global template (Normal.dotm)Follow the steps for the operating system that you are using:
Windows Vista and Windows 7
a)
Exit Word 2010
b)
Click
Start.
c)
In the
Start Search box, type the following text, and then press
ENTER:
1.
%userprofile%\appdata\roaming\microsoft\templates
d)
Right-click
Normal.dotm, and then click Rename.
e)
Type
Oldword.old, and then press ENTER.
Microsoft Windows XP
a)
Exit Word 2010
b)
Click
Start, and then click Run.
c)
In the
Open box, type the following text, and then press ENTER:
%userprofile%\Application Data\Microsoft\Templates
d)
Right-click
Normal.dotm, and then click Rename.
e)
Type
Oldword.old, and then press ENTER.
f)
Close Windows Explorer.
How to troubleshoot print failures in Word 2010, Word 2007, and Word 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/826845
Please take your time to try the suggestions and let me know the results at your earliest convenience. If anything is unclear or if there is anything
I can do for you, please feel free to let me know.
Hope that helps.
Sincerely
William Zhou CHNPlease remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

Schedule line getting confirmed when Ordered Quanity is greater than stock.

Hi Sap Gurus,
We have an issue in one of the sales scenario.
In one of the sales orders the ordered quanity is purposely maintained greater than the stock at respective storage location(batch managed).
In this case the schedule line should not get confirmed and it should not allow delivery document creation.
But in the sales order the schedule lines are geeting confirmed and even the delivery document is getting created with picking request completion.
Could you please help to understand :
1. why the schedule lines are getting confirmed when ordered quantity > Inventory?
2. How do I stop delivery document creaton in this scenario?
Looking for a quick response.
Thanks in advance,
Bhaskar

Hello Bhaskar,
Is Availability Check in your system considering Replenishment Lead time, if yes, then this is possible.
Check this IMG Link:
IMG - Sales and Distribution - Basic Functions - Availability Check and Transfer of Requirements - Availability Check with ATP Logic or Against Planning - Carry Out Control For Availability Check
Here check the RLT settings.
Also check settings under In/Outward Movements, where things like include Purchase Order can lead to confirmation of stock in Sales Order, despite physical inventory being present.
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Java always returns 15 minutes greater than the current time.

Hi,
I am using Microsoft Windows Server 2003R2,Standard X64 edition with Service Pack 2 and jdk1.6.0-03.
Java always returns time 15 minutes greater than the current system time.
eg:
SimpleDateFormat simpleDateFormat=new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss");
System.out.println("Now time: "+simpleDateFormat.format(new Date()));
System.out.println("Now time: "+new Date());The output of the program is :
Now time: 2008-12-22 18:47:04
Now time: Mon Dec 22 18:47:04 NPT 2008
When my actual system time is 6:32 PM or (18:32)
I have checked the current time with other programming languages like python and it always returns the actual date and time.
Note: To my observation java is always utilizing a time which is 15 minutes greater than the current time even for its log.
Thanks,
Rajeswari (Msys)

I think a more practical time machine would be one that actually travels back in time rather than forward (by 15 minutes). Sounds like it needs some more work.
Anyway, I suggest changing the system time on your computer to some other value (say, 2 hours ahead), then running the program again. If its off by 2 hours and 15 minutes, its getting the time from your computer. However, if its still off by only 15 minutes (from your wristwatch's time), then its getting the time form somehere other than the computer clock.

Payment Amount is greater than invoice amount in sales order

Hi experts:
I have a Sales order that contained originally 3 lines of which the first 2 lines was delivered totally and the third was delivered partially.
The client decided to change the remaining quantity for another reference so the procedure in the sales order was to add another line and try to close the third line by right click and "close row" but the option is not available because there is a partial delivery, so the option was to update the inicial quantity in the third line at the same as delivered and update.
Like a result a I could close the third line and leave a fourth line available to delivery, however when I open this Sales order again an try to update a message "payment amount is greater than invoice amount" and appears inmediately the "Deposit on Order" window.
Other Information: The quantities delivered was invoiced but no payment has been received.
Checking in the SCN I have not found some related information with this case because the existing answers are related with incomming and outgoing payments but like I mentioned before this docuements already have not payments.
In relation with the decimal places, my original decimal places configuration was 2 and it was updated to 3, issue that neither is mentioned in previous answers.
I will appreciate your help,
Thanks,
Manuel

Hi Manuel,
Your case is complicated by the fact you have not only undated the Sales Order which is partially delivered but also updated decimal places during the process. In this case, you are probably the best person to figure out what is the system expected number. You may restore your production db to test environment first. Then do whatever you could to fix the problem. If no solution can be found, you have to log a message to SAP support.
A general advice: do not fight with system for what you think system should accept.
Thanks,
Gordon

Greater than operator in SQL

Hi friends,
A table has 2 colums A and B.How i can return a flag ,say 1 if A is greater than B or 0 if A is less than B,by using SQL.
Can any one help me out.
thanks and regards,
Ajith

select a,b,case when a > b then 1
                when a=b   then 0
                else -1
           end FLAG
from table;

Why do 15.4" Macbook Pro's not support resolutions greater than 1440 x 900?

Hi.
I am a Microsoft .net software developer and am seriously considering getting a Macbook Pro to do some iPhone development. My company has provided me with a 15.4" Dell Precision M4400 that features an LED-backlit screen and nVidia Quadro FX 770M discrete graphics card, supporting 1920 x 1200 native resolution. I'd like to know why the 15.4" Macbook Pro's do not support anything greater than 1440 x 900 when it seems entirely possible? I understand that 17" MBP's do support 1920 x 1200 but it is not currently an option I'm considering pursuing due to the increased size and weight.
Thanks.
Jon
Message was edited by: jonb86uk

Just to be clear, since you're bringing up graphics cards - the 15" MBP supports up to 2560x1600 resolution on an external display, and simultaneously supports full native resolution on the internal display. As Phil points out, the native resolution of the 15" MBP's internal display is 1440x900, and Apple does not offer a higher resolution option for that model (although higher resolution 15" displays do exist). As to why that's the case, only Apple can answer that or change that.
You can submit feedback to Apple: http://www.apple.com/feedback/macbookpro.html.
As you know, if you want to use the iPhone SDK, you need an Intel-based Mac running Mac OS 10.5 Leopard.
Ps. Welcome back, Phil!!

Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error

Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error when doing incoming payment
regards
kavitha S

Hi Kavitha,
please check in the OINV table the balance due on the invoice. This amount has to match the payment. If the problem is due to different decimal places & you are using a version lower than 2007 you will be able to change the decimal places for this particular payment. If you are using 2007, you will no longer be able to reduce the number of decimal places. In that case you could check out SAP note 1321183 & verify with your accountant that the workaround may be used.
All the best,
Kerstin

Unable to send messages with attachments greater than 5 Mb using iPad 2

Hello
We are running into an issue in our organization where messages forwarded or composed from an iPad 2 ( iOS 6.1.0.3) with an attachment greater than 5 Mb fail to send.
iOS devices connect through MobileIron into Exchange 2010 SP1 RU8. Our message restriction on the Exchange end is 25 Mb.
Our MobileIron support team has ruled out any issue on their end. We cannot determine if the matter resides with the devide or Exchange, though we are suspecting the device.
We are able to forward or compose messages up to 5 Mb without an issue. We have also been able to receive different attachments up to 17 Mb without too much trouble, the exception being a 12 Mb MP4 video. The 12 Mb MP4 file would not download. This is why we're suspecting a device issue.
Has anyone run into something similar?

Are you certain it is not a limitation with your SMTP-server? OR the receiving end of your larger-than-10MB message?
Try and send a big one to yourself. If it doesn't work, try a free SMTP server.

Post park ivoice M8079 'Reversal value greater than value invoiced to date'

I create a Service purchase order number is 8200000747 in our products system, and service entry sheet number is 1000026152, material document number is 5000306476.
When I create a park invoice reference this Service PO, the system can not clear GR/IR account with that service entry sheet(1000026152). When we want to post this park invoice, system generate message M8079 'Reversal value greater than value invoiced to date'. But, this item never been verification invoice , I can find this not cleared GR/IR data in MR11, this item not a multi account assignment , no foreign currency.
What happened? How can I carry out the correct GR/IR account data in park invoice?

Hello,
Instead of reversing the invoice try posting the Credit Memo through MIRO .
Regards
Mahesh

Amount to credit greater than credit balance - goods return to AP Cred Note

Hi All,
I've got the following scenario:
We have a AP Goods Return on the system which totals £12.94 with freight charges of -£3.75. We have copied this to a AP Credit Note, but have amended the freight from -£3.75 to -£3.00(UK VAT Rate 15% applicable throughout). The total credit field now shows £13.80 and the credit balance field shows £12.94. When you try to add the document it gives an error "amount to credit greater than credit balance". I'm using 2005A PL53.
Can anyone please advise the reason behind the error and also what the correct way of handling this kind of transaction would be?
Kind regards,
Matt

Hi Wesley,
I tried both methods and it doesn't resolve the issue. Spoke to SAP, they gave me a solution and workaround, the issue is a bit more complicated as what it may seem. You manually have to close the goods return, create a standalone service credit note with the appropriate GL account to reverse out the "goods clearing account" entry created by the reversal journal. The bahaviour has been changed in SBO 2007 and therefore the problem is not present in this version anymore. Thanks for your help anyway.
Kind regards,
Matt
Edited by: Greeff Matt on Jun 5, 2009 9:47 AM

I have a manual that contains headings and index entries that contain less than and greater than characters, and . The Publish to Responsive HTML5 function escapes these correctly in the main body of the text but does not work correctly in either the C

I have a manual that contains headings and index entries that contain less than and greater than characters, < and >. The Publish to Responsive HTML5 function escapes these correctly in the main body of the text but does not work correctly in either the Contents or the Index of the generated HTML. In the Contents the words are completely missing and in the index entries the '\' characters that are required in the markers remain in the entry but the leading less than symbol and the first character of the word is deleted; hence what should appear as <dataseries> appears as \ataseries\>. I believe this is a FMv12 bug. Has anyone else experienced this? Is the FM team aware and working on a fix. Any suggestions for a workaround?

The Index issue is more complicated since in order to get the < and > into the index requires the entry itself to be escaped. So, in order to index '<x2settings>' you have to key '\<x2settings\>'. Looking at the generated index entry in the .js file we see '<key name=\"\\2settings\\>\">. This is a bit of a mess and produces an index entry of '\2settings\>'. This ought to be '<key name=\"&lt;x2settings&gt;\" >'. I have tested this fix and it works - but the worst of it is that the first character of the index entry has been stripped out. Consequently I cannot fix this with a few global changes - and I have a lot of index entries of this type. I'm looking forward to a response to this since I cannot publish this document in its current state.

MRTG Out Greater than In

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for