MS SQL query slow using view column as criteria
HI,
I am experiencing a very frustrate problem. I have 2 tables, and create a view
to union these 2 tables, when do a select on this view using the column of the
view as criteria is took more 1 minutes, but the query runs fine in Qurey Analyzer.
Anybody has the same experience? is this the problem with jdbc?
I searched http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs70/index.html, also searched the documentation
for wls6.1, wls5.1. As you pointed I searched support site, they are all the customer
case, it's not formal documentation.
Joe Weinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
jen wrote:
Thanks. but I search on the table is fine (the same column). is thereany db setting
could be tuned? so the view is the problem? No, it's a client decision/issue. If you defined your tables to have
nvarchar columns
the jdbc driver's parameter values would be fine as-is.
I searched "useVarChars" on whole
site and can't find anything.Which site? This is a property of the weblogic.jdbc.mssqlserver4.Driver.
I just went to www.bea.com/support and entered useVarChars in the Ask
BEA
question panel and got hits...
Joe
Joe Weinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
Jen wrote:
Sorry it's my bad. I am testing on wls81, but the problems is on wls70,so they
are using different drivers.
You are the magic man. It worked on wls81 now. I am sure it will curethe problem
on wls70. Is there any documentation on this? Why it is not a problemon some
databse server? ThanksSure. The issue has to do with the MS client-DBMS protocol having evolved
from
an 8-bit (7-bit really) character representation. Now it has a newer
16-bit
way, to transfer NVARCHAR data. Java characters are all 16-bit, so
by default
a JDBC driver will send Java parameters over as NVARCHAR data. This
is
crucial
for Japanese data etc. However, once simple ASCII data is transformed
to an
NVARCHAR format, the DBMS can't directly compare it to varchar data,
or use it
in index searches. The DBMS has to convert the VARCHAR data to NVARCHAR,
but it
can't guarantee that the converted data will retain the same ordering
as the index,
so the DBMS has to do a table scan!
The properties I suggested are each driver's way of allowing you
to say "I'm
a simple American ;) I am using simple varchar data so please sendmy
java
strings that way.". This allows the DBMS to use your varchar indexes
in queries.
Joe Weinstein at BEA
Joe Weinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
Jen wrote:
It doesn't cure the problem. Here is my pool
<JDBCConnectionPool DriverName="weblogic.jdbc.sqlserver.SQLServerDriver"Name="test_pool"
Password="{3DES}fKSovViFe5kHzl/vTs0LVQ==" Properties="user=user;PortNumber=1543;useVarChars=true;ServerName=194.20.2.10;DatabaseName=devDB"
Targets="admin" TestTableName="SQL SELECT COUNT(*) FROM sysobjects"URL="jdbc:bea:sqlserver://194.20.2.10:1543"/>
Strange is some database is fine.Oh, sorry. I thought it was the older weblogic driver. Change the
useVarChars=true to sendStringParametersAsUnicode=false
Let me know... Also, I suggest changing the TestTableName to "SQL
select
1".
For MS, that will be much more efficient than involving a full count
of sysobjects!
Joe
Joe Weinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
Jen wrote:
You are right. Tadaa! Am I Kreskin, or what? ;) Here's what I recommend:
In your pool definition, for this driver add a driver property:
useVarChars=true
and let me know if it's all better.
Joe
I am using weblogic jdbc driver weblogic.jdbc.mssqlserver4.Driver.
here is the code:
getData(Connection connection, String stmt, ArrayList arguments)
PreparedStatement pStatement=null;>>>>>>>> ResultSet resultSet=null;>>>>>>>> try {>>>>>>>> pStatement = connection.prepareStatement(stmt);>>>>>>>> for (int i = 1; i <= arguments.size(); i++) {>>>>>>>> pStatement.setString(i, (String) arguments.get(i-1));>>>>>>>> resultSet = pStatement.executeQuery(); //this statement takesmore than 1
min.
Joe Weinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
Jen wrote:
HI,
I am experiencing a very frustrate problem. I have 2 tables,
and
create
a view
to union these 2 tables, when do a select on this view using
the
column
of the
view as criteria is took more 1 minutes, but the query runs
fine
in
Qurey Analyzer.
Anybody has the same experience? is this the problem with jdbc?
I have suspicions... Show me the jdbc code. I'm guessing it's
a
PreparedStatement,
and you send the search criterion column value as a parameter
you
set
with a
setString().... Let me know... (also let me know which jdbc driveryou're
using).
Joe
Similar Messages
-
Sql query slowness due to rank and columns with null values:
Sql query slowness due to rank and columns with null values:
I have the following table in database with around 10 millions records:
Declaration:
create table PropertyOwners (
[Key] int not null primary key,
PropertyKey int not null,
BoughtDate DateTime,
OwnerKey int null,
GroupKey int null
go
[Key] is primary key and combination of PropertyKey, BoughtDate, OwnerKey and GroupKey is unique.
With the following index:
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_PropertyOwners] ON [dbo].[PropertyOwners]
[PropertyKey] ASC,
[BoughtDate] DESC,
[OwnerKey] DESC,
[GroupKey] DESC
go
Description of the case:
For single BoughtDate one property can belong to multiple owners or single group, for single record there can either be OwnerKey or GroupKey but not both so one of them will be null for each record. I am trying to retrieve the data from the table using
following query for the OwnerKey. If there are same property rows for owners and group at the same time than the rows having OwnerKey with be preferred, that is why I am using "OwnerKey desc" in Rank function.
declare @ownerKey int = 40000
select PropertyKey, BoughtDate, OwnerKey, GroupKey
from (
select PropertyKey, BoughtDate, OwnerKey, GroupKey,
RANK() over (partition by PropertyKey order by BoughtDate desc, OwnerKey desc, GroupKey desc) as [Rank]
from PropertyOwners
) as result
where result.[Rank]=1 and result.[OwnerKey]=@ownerKey
It is taking 2-3 seconds to get the records which is too slow, similar time it is taking as I try to get the records using the GroupKey. But when I tried to get the records for the PropertyKey with the same query, it is executing in 10 milliseconds.
May be the slowness is due to as OwnerKey/GroupKey in the table can be null and sql server in unable to index it. I have also tried to use the Indexed view to pre ranked them but I can't use it in my query as Rank function is not supported in indexed
view.
Please note this table is updated once a day and using Sql Server 2008 R2. Any help will be greatly appreciated.create table #result (PropertyKey int not null, BoughtDate datetime, OwnerKey int null, GroupKey int null, [Rank] int not null)Create index idx ON #result(OwnerKey ,rnk)
insert into #result(PropertyKey, BoughtDate, OwnerKey, GroupKey, [Rank])
select PropertyKey, BoughtDate, OwnerKey, GroupKey,
RANK() over (partition by PropertyKey order by BoughtDate desc, OwnerKey desc, GroupKey desc) as [Rank]
from PropertyOwners
go
declare @ownerKey int = 1
select PropertyKey, BoughtDate, OwnerKey, GroupKey
from #result as result
where result.[Rank]=1
and result.[OwnerKey]=@ownerKey
go
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence -
IF NEW VARIABLE IN SQL QUERY, DISPLAYS AS LAST COLUMN + rpad not working
Hello everybody and thank you in advance,
1) if I add a new variable to my sql query to select a column which was already in the table, it shows it in the report table as the Last column to the right. That is, if I add "street" to
something like city, postcode, street, store, manager, etc, instead of placing street between postcode and store, it places it as i said as the last column to the right.
2) When values are entered into the cells of the tables, yes, they do expand it to their needed lenght, But, only if it is one word. If it is two, like when i enter the value "very good"
then it takes two lines so as with a carriage return within the cell, thus, making it too high the row. I tried to padd spaces with rpad but it did not work. something like rpad(stock, 20,' ')
I must say that the table is in the same page where there is a Form, so as the table grows in lenth it is actually squeezing the form located right on its left.
3) rpad did not work with the most simple syntax, but less would with what i need because it turns out i am using DECODE in order to do a conversion between value displayed and
value returned in my select list of values, something like : DECODE (TO_CHAR (stock),'1','Deficient','2','Average','3','Good','4','Very Good',null) AS stock,
so, i have tried to put the rpad there in several places but either it gave parsing error or it left the column empty not picking any values.
thank you very much
AlvaroAlvaro
1) That is standard behaviour of apex builder. You can change the display order with the arrows in the report attributes column report.
2) You will have to play with the style attributes of the column to accomplice this. For instance style="white-space:pre;" in the Element Attributes of the column attributes. White-space:normal would thread several space (' ') as 1. So no matter how many you add with rpad they will be shown as 1.
Or set a width either as attibute or in a style class for that column.
Nicolette -
Sql query slow in new redhat enviornment
We just migrated to a new dev environment in Linux REDHAT5, and now the query is very slow, and I used the TOAD to run the query, it took like 700 msecond to finish, however from any server connection, the sql query takes hours to finish.
I checked toad monitor, it said need to increase db_buffer_cache and shared pool too small.
Also three red alert from toad is:
1. Library Cache get hit ratio: Dynamic or unsharable sql
2. Chained fetch ratio: PCT free too low for a table
3. parse to execute ratio: HIgh parse to execute ratio.
App team said it ran real quick in the old AIX system, however I ran it in old system, and monitored in the toad, it gave me all same 5 red alerts in old system, and it did provide query results a lot quicker though.
Here is the parameters in the old system (11gr1 on AIX):
SQL> show parameter target
NAME TYPE VALUE
-------------------------------- archive_lag_target integer 0
db_flashback_retention_target integer 1440
fast_start_io_target integer 0
fast_start_mttr_target integer 0
memory_max_target big integer 0
memory_target big integer 0
pga_aggregate_target big integer 278928K
sga_target big integer 0
SQL> show parameter shared
NAME TYPE VALUE
-------------------------------- hi_shared_memory_address integer 0
max_shared_servers integer
shared_memory_address integer 0
shared_pool_reserved_size big integer 31876710
shared_pool_size big integer 608M
shared_server_sessions integer
shared_servers integer 0
SQL> show parameter db_buffer
SQL> show parameter buffer
NAME TYPE VALUE
-------------------------------- buffer_pool_keep string
buffer_pool_recycle string
db_block_buffers integer 0
log_buffer integer 2048000
use_indirect_data_buffers boolean FALSE
SQL>
In new 11gr2 Linux REDHAT parameter:
NAME TYPE VALUE
----------- archive_lag_target integer 0
db_flashback_retention_target integer 1440
fast_start_io_target integer 0
fast_start_mttr_target integer 0
memory_max_target big integer 2512M
memory_target big integer 2512M
parallel_servers_target integer 192
pga_aggregate_target big integer 0
sga_target big integer 1648M
SQL> show parameter shared
NAME TYPE VALUE
----------- hi_shared_memory_address integer 0
max_shared_servers integer
shared_memory_address integer 0
shared_pool_reserved_size big integer 28M
shared_pool_size big integer 0
shared_server_sessions integer
shared_servers integer 1
SQL> show parameter buffer
NAME TYPE VALUE
----------- buffer_pool_keep string
buffer_pool_recycle string
db_block_buffers integer 0
log_buffer integer 18857984
use_indirect_data_buffers boolean FALSE
SQL>
Please help. Thanks in advance.846422 wrote:
why need ddl? we have a sql query slow.The DDL shows the physical structure of the table and physical storage characteristics. All relevant in performance tuning.
As for the SQL query being slow. It is not.
You have not provided any evidence that it is slow. And no, comparing performance with a totally different system is not a valid baseline for comparison. (most cars have 4 wheels, a gearbox and a steering wheel - but that does not mean you can compare different cars like a VW Beetle with a VW Porsche)
What is slow? What are the biggest wait states for the SQL? What does the execution plan say?
You have not defined a problem - you identified a symptom called "+query is slow+". You need to diagnose the condition by determining exactly what the SQL qeury is doing in the database. (and please, do not use TOAD and similar tools in an attempt to do this - do it properly instead) -
How to write a SQL Query without using group by clause
Hi,
Can anyone help me to find out if there is a approach to build a SQL Query without using group by clause.
Please site an example if is it so,
RegardsI hope this example could illuminate danepc on is problem.
CREATE or replace TYPE MY_ARRAY AS TABLE OF INTEGER
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION GET_ARR return my_array
as
arr my_array;
begin
arr := my_array();
for i in 1..10 loop
arr.extend;
arr(i) := i mod 7;
end loop;
return arr;
end;
select column_value
from table(get_arr)
order by column_value;
select column_value,count(*) occurences
from table(get_arr)
group by column_value
order by column_value;And the output should be something like this:
SQL> CREATE or replace TYPE MY_ARRAY AS TABLE OF INTEGER
2 /
Tipo creato.
SQL>
SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION GET_ARR return my_array
2 as
3 arr my_array;
4 begin
5 arr := my_array();
6 for i in 1..10 loop
7 arr.extend;
8 arr(i) := i mod 7;
9 end loop;
10 return arr;
11 end;
12 /
Funzione creata.
SQL>
SQL>
SQL> select column_value
2 from table(get_arr)
3 order by column_value;
COLUMN_VALUE
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
5
6
Selezionate 10 righe.
SQL>
SQL> select column_value,count(*) occurences
2 from table(get_arr)
3 group by column_value
4 order by column_value;
COLUMN_VALUE OCCURENCES
0 1
1 2
2 2
3 2
4 1
5 1
6 1
Selezionate 7 righe.
SQL> Bye Alessandro -
SQL Query - The number of columns specified in "SQL Query" does not match t
I am creating new UDM for tablespace alert, below is my query,however its failing with error
SQL Query - The number of columns specified in "SQL Query" does not match the value specified in "SQL Query Output"
I selected Metric type is number
SQL Query Format : Two columns
Query:
SELECT d.tablespace_name,round(((a.bytes - NVL(f.bytes,0))*100/a.maxbytes),2)
used_pct FROM sys.dba_tablespaces d,(select tablespace_name, sum(bytes) bytes, sum(greatest(maxbytes,bytes)) maxbytes from sys.dba_data_files group by tablespace_name) a,(select tablespace_name, sum(bytes) bytes from sys.dba_free_space group by tablespace_name) f
WHERE d.tablespace_name = a.tablespace_name(+) AND d.tablespace_name = f.tablespace_name(+)
AND NOT (d.extent_management = 'LOCAL' AND d.contents = 'TEMPORARY');
Any clues why i am getting error.SQL> SELECT d.tablespace_name,round(((a.bytes - NVL(f.bytes,0))*100/a.maxbytes),2) used_pct
2 FROM sys.dba_tablespaces d,(select tablespace_name, sum(bytes) bytes, sum(greatest(maxbytes,bytes)) maxbytes from sys.dba_data_files group by tablespace_name) a,(select tablespace_name, sum(bytes) bytes from sys.dba_free_space group by tablespace_name) f
3 WHERE d.tablespace_name = a.tablespace_name(+) AND d.tablespace_name = f.tablespace_name(+)
4 AND NOT (d.extent_management = 'LOCAL' AND d.contents = 'TEMPORARY');
TABLESPACE_NAME USED_PCT
MGMT_TABLESPACE .82
SYSAUX 1.52
UNDOTBS1 .32
RMAN .02
CORRUPT_TS 10.63
USERS 0
SYSTEM 2.26
MGMT_ECM_DEPOT_TS .04
MGMT_AD4J_TS 0 -
Need help with SQL Query with Inline View + Group by
Hello Gurus,
I would really appreciate your time and effort regarding this query. I have the following data set.
Reference_No---Check_Number---Check_Date--------Description-------------------------------Invoice_Number----------Invoice_Type---Paid_Amount-----Vendor_Number
1234567----------11223-------------- 7/5/2008----------paid for cleaning----------------------44345563------------------I-----------------*20.00*-------------19
1234567----------11223--------------7/5/2008-----------Adjustment for bad quality---------44345563------------------A-----------------10.00------------19
7654321----------11223--------------7/5/2008-----------Adjustment from last billing cycle-----23543556-------------------A--------------------50.00--------------19
4653456----------11223--------------7/5/2008-----------paid for cleaning------------------------35654765--------------------I---------------------30.00-------------19
Please Ignore '----', added it for clarity
I am trying to write a query to aggregate paid_amount based on Reference_No, Check_Number, Payment_Date, Invoice_Number, Invoice_Type, Vendor_Number and display description with Invoice_type 'I' when there are multiple records with the same Reference_No, Check_Number, Payment_Date, Invoice_Number, Invoice_Type, Vendor_Number. When there are no multiple records I want to display the respective Description.
The query should return the following data set
Reference_No---Check_Number---Check_Date--------Description-------------------------------Invoice_Number----------Invoice_Type---Paid_Amount-----Vendor_Number
1234567----------11223-------------- 7/5/2008----------paid for cleaning----------------------44345563------------------I-----------------*10.00*------------19
7654321----------11223--------------7/5/2008-----------Adjustment from last billing cycle-----23543556-------------------A--------------------50.00--------------19
4653456----------11223--------------7/5/2008-----------paid for cleaning------------------------35654765-------------------I---------------------30.00--------------19
The following is my query. I am kind of lost.
select B.Description, A.sequence_id,A.check_date, A.check_number, A.invoice_number, A.amount, A.vendor_number
from (
select sequence_id,check_date, check_number, invoice_number, sum(paid_amount) amount, vendor_number
from INVOICE
group by sequence_id,check_date, check_number, invoice_number, vendor_number
) A, INVOICE B
where A.sequence_id = B.sequence_id
Thanks,
NickIt looks like it is a duplicate thread - correct me if i'm wrong in this case ->
Need help with SQL Query with Inline View + Group by
Regards.
Satyaki De. -
Using IN keyword in an sql query in a view criteria
Hi,
I am using jdev 11.1.1.1.0 and defined an lov query/viewobject as
select a, b, c from myTable
I now need to predefine filtering for lov search functionality and need something like the following
select a, B, c from myTable where B in ('X','Y')
I could not find a way to do it (i.e. specify the use of IN Keyword) in the Create View Criteria dialog box. I tried to define OR, but is that the best way to redefine IN as i have a long list (the above is just an example)
(( ( (UPPER(B_FLAG) = UPPER('X') ) ) OR ( (UPPER(DISPLAY_FLAG) = UPPER('Y') ) ) ))If you know how many variables are in your "in" You can just write this in the sql query of your VO:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/obe11jdev/ps1/ria_application/images/t136.gif
From this tutorial:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/obe11jdev/ps1/ria_application/developriaapplication_long.htm#ah1 -
Column Headings on PL/SQL returning SQL Query report- using br
Hi,
I would like to create a report region based upon a function returning a SQL query. As a dem oI have created the following:
create or replace function xxjk_retsql return varchar2
as
begin
return 'select i "column header" from wwv_flow_dual100';
end;I want to be able to insert a line break in the column header so it wraps over two lines. I tried this:
create or replace function xxjk_retsql return varchar2
as
begin
return 'select i "column<br>header" from wwv_flow_dual100';
end;however when the region is rendered, it appears to strip out the HTML tag. I also tried another tag, <i></i>, as a test and this is stripped out also.
Is there a way to include a break in a column header in this manner?
Thank-you,There is an option Strip HTML and it is turned on by default. Try changing that to see what happes.
Denes Kubicek
http://deneskubicek.blogspot.com/
http://www.opal-consulting.de/training
http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=31517:1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -
Sql query slow while using poc *C, OCI
Sql query is taking long time while using fetching records from RAC using Pro *C, OCI. Same query working fine while using JDBC connection.what could be the issue.Please help
Thanks,
SamPro*C is not part of Oracle Solaris Studio (formerly Sun Studio). Studio has no special support for database programming. You are more likely to get a helpful answer in a database programming forum. Start here:
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=18 -
SQL query slow with call to function
I have a SQL query that will return in less than a second or two with a function in-line selected in the "from" clause of the statement. As soon as I select that returned value in the SQL statement, the statement takes from anywhere from 2 to 5 minutes to return. Here is a simplified sample from the statement:
This statement returns in a second or 2.
select A.pk_id
from stu_schedule A, stu_school B, stu_year C, school_year D,
(select calc_ytd_class_abs2(Z.PK_ID,'U') ytd_unx
from stu_schedule Z) II
where B.pk_id = A.fk_stu_school
and C.pk_id = B.fk_stu_year
and D.pk_id = C.year
and D.school_year = '2011';
if I add this function call in, the statement runs extremely poor.
select A.pk_id,
II.ytd_unx
from stu_schedule A, stu_school B, stu_year C, school_year D,
(select calc_ytd_class_abs2(Z.PK_ID,'U') ytd_unx
from stu_schedule Z) II
where B.pk_id = A.fk_stu_school
and C.pk_id = B.fk_stu_year
and D.pk_id = C.year
and D.school_year = '2011';
Here is the function that is called:
create or replace FUNCTION calc_ytd_class_abs2 (p_fk_stu_schedule in varchar2,
p_legality in varchar2) return number IS
l_days_absent number := 0;
CURSOR get_class_abs IS
select (select nvl(max(D.days_absent),'0')
from cut_code D
where D.pk_id = C.fk_cut_code
and (D.legality = p_legality
or p_legality = '%')) days_absent
from stu_schedule_detail B, stu_class_attendance C
where B.fk_stu_schedule = p_fk_stu_schedule
and C.fk_stu_schedule_detail = B.pk_id;
BEGIN
FOR x in get_class_abs LOOP
l_days_absent := l_days_absent + x.days_absent;
END LOOP;
return (l_days_absent);
END calc_ytd_class_abs2;Query returns anywhere from 6000 to 32000 rows. For each of those rows a parameter is passed in to 4 different functions to get ytd totals. When I call the functions in the in-line view but do not select from them in the main SQL, the report (oh, this is Application Express 4.0 interactive reports, just an FYI) runs fast. The report comes back in a few seconds. But when I select from the in-line view to display those ytd totals, the report runs extremely slow. I know there are the articles about context switching and how mixing SQL with PL/SQL performs poorly. So I tried a pipeline table function where the function for the ytd totals populate the columns of the pipeline table and I select from the pipeline table in the SQL query in the interactive report. That seemed to perform a little worse from what I can tell.
Thanks for any help you can offer. -
Hi
I have an SQL that has poor performance when querying a 3 table view.
I have tried to tune the view by adding an additional index but the EXPLAIN plan does not change. In fact, the plan is ONLY using fields specified in the the views join conditions and not the WHERE clause.
I have created an index EKET~Z1 with the column for table (T003)
EINDT
and I have also tried another index EKKO~Z2 with the columns for table T001
BSART
BSTYP
EKORG
The query is as follows:
SQL Statement
SELECT
"MANDT" , "EBELN" , "EBELP" , "ETENR" , "EKKO_LOEKZ" , "BSTYP" ,
"BSART" , "BUKRS" , "EKORG" , "EKGRP" , "STATU" , "AEDAT" , "ERNAM" ,
"BEDAT" , "LIFNR" , "ADRNR" , "WAERS" , "EKPO_LOEKZ" , "EKPO_BSTYP" ,
"TXZ01" , "MATNR" , "EMATN" , "WERKS" , "MATKL" , "IDNLF" , "MENGE" ,
"MEINS" , "NETPR" , "NETWR" , "PSTYP" , "KNTTP" , "WEPOS" , "ANFNR" ,
"PRDAT" , "KONNR" , "KTPNR" , "ELIKZ" , "EREKZ" , "EINDT" , "SLFDT" ,
"LPEIN" , "EKET_MENGE" , "EKET_WEMNG" , "BANFN" , "BNFPO" , "MBDAT" ,
"WADAT" , "WEBRE" , "FRGRL" , "ZZKONNR" , "ZZKTPNR" , "MAHNZ" ,
"MAHN1" , "MAHN2" , "MAHN3" , "INFNR"
FROM
"ZPO_DETAIL"
WHERE
"MANDT" = ? AND "EKORG" = ? AND "BSTYP" = ? AND "BSART" = ? AND
"WERKS" = ? AND "EINDT" < ? AND "EKPO_LOEKZ" <> ? AND "ELIKZ" <> ?
ORDER BY
"EBELN" , "EBELP" , "ETENR"
VIEW DETAILS
CREATE VIEW ZPO_DETAIL
(MANDT,
EBELN,
EBELP,
ETENR,
EKKO_LOEKZ,
BSTYP,
BSART,
BUKRS,
EKORG,
EKGRP,
STATU,
AEDAT,
ERNAM,
BEDAT,
LIFNR,
ADRNR,
WAERS,
EKPO_LOEKZ,
EKPO_BSTYP,
TXZ01,
MATNR,
EMATN,
WERKS,
MATKL,
IDNLF,
MENGE,
MEINS,
NETPR,
NETWR,
PSTYP,
KNTTP,
WEPOS,
ANFNR,
PRDAT,
KONNR,
KTPNR,
ELIKZ,
EREKZ,
EINDT,
SLFDT,
LPEIN,
EKET_MENGE,
EKET_WEMNG,
BANFN,
BNFPO,
MBDAT,
WADAT,
WEBRE,
FRGRL,
ZZKONNR,
ZZKTPNR,
MAHNZ,
MAHN1,
MAHN2,
MAHN3 )
AS SELECT
T0003."MANDT",
T0003."EBELN",
T0003."EBELP",
T0001."ETENR",
T0002."LOEKZ",
T0002."BSTYP",
T0002."BSART",
T0002."BUKRS",
T0002."EKORG",
T0002."EKGRP",
T0002."STATU",
T0002."AEDAT",
T0002."ERNAM",
T0002."BEDAT",
T0002."LIFNR",
T0002."ADRNR",
T0002."WAERS",
T0003."LOEKZ",
T0003."BSTYP",
T0003."TXZ01",
T0003."MATNR",
T0003."EMATN",
T0003."WERKS",
T0003."MATKL",
T0003."IDNLF",
T0003."MENGE",
T0003."MEINS",
T0003."NETPR",
T0003."NETWR",
T0003."PSTYP",
T0003."KNTTP",
T0003."WEPOS",
T0003."ANFNR",
T0003."PRDAT",
T0003."KONNR",
T0003."KTPNR",
T0003."ELIKZ",
T0003."EREKZ",
T0001."EINDT",
T0001."SLFDT",
T0001."LPEIN",
T0001."MENGE",
T0001."WEMNG",
T0001."BANFN",
T0001."BNFPO",
T0001."MBDAT",
T0001."WADAT",
T0003."WEBRE",
T0002."FRGRL",
T0003."ZZKONNR",
T0003."ZZKTPNR",
T0003."MAHNZ",
T0003."MAHN1",
T0003."MAHN2",
T0003."MAHN3"
FROM
SAPCEP."EKET" T0001,
SAPCEP."EKKO" T0002,
SAPCEP."EKPO" T0003
WHERE
T0002."MANDT" = T0003."MANDT" AND
T0002."EBELN" = T0003."EBELN" AND
T0003."MANDT" = T0001."MANDT" AND
T0003."EBELN" = T0001."EBELN" AND
T0003."EBELP" = T0001."EBELP"
EXPLAIN PLAN
Execution Plan for SQL Optimizer
TABLENAME COLUMN OR INDEX STRATEGY PAGECOUNT
T0003 RANGE CONDITION FOR KEY 15758
MANDT (USED KEY COLUMN)
T0001 JOIN VIA MULTIPLE KEY COLUMNS 8632
MANDT (USED KEY COLUMN)
EBELN (USED KEY COLUMN)
T0002 JOIN VIA MULTIPLE KEY COLUMNS 40109
MANDT (USED KEY COLUMN)
EBELN (USED KEY COLUMN)
EBELP (USED KEY COLUMN)
NO TEMPORARY RESULTS CREATED
SHOW RESULT IS COPIED , COSTVALUE IS 31186
SHOW QUERYREWRITE - APPLIED RULES:
SHOW MergeFromSelectOrView 1
The statistics are up-to-date.
Any tips would be welcome.
Thanks
Doug> I have created an index EKET~Z1 with the column for table (T003)
> EINDT
>
> and I have also tried another index EKKO~Z2 with the columns for table T001
> BSART
> BSTYP
> EKORG
>
SQL Statement
>
> SELECT
> "MANDT" , "EBELN" , "EBELP" , "ETENR" , "EKKO_LOEKZ" , "BSTYP" ,
> FROM
> "ZPO_DETAIL"
> WHERE
> "MANDT" = ? AND "EKORG" = ? AND "BSTYP" = ? AND "BSART" = ? AND
> "WERKS" = ? AND "EINDT" < ? AND "EKPO_LOEKZ" <> ? AND "ELIKZ" <> ?
> ORDER BY
> "EBELN" , "EBELP" , "ETENR"
>
> EXPLAIN PLAN
> -
>
> Execution Plan for SQL Optimizer
>
> TABLENAME COLUMN OR INDEX STRATEGY PAGECOUNT
>
> T0003 RANGE CONDITION FOR KEY 15758
> MANDT (USED KEY COLUMN)
>
> T0001 JOIN VIA MULTIPLE KEY COLUMNS 8632
> MANDT (USED KEY COLUMN)
> EBELN (USED KEY COLUMN)
>
> T0002 JOIN VIA MULTIPLE KEY COLUMNS 40109
> MANDT (USED KEY COLUMN)
> EBELN (USED KEY COLUMN)
> EBELP (USED KEY COLUMN)
>
> NO TEMPORARY RESULTS CREATED
> SHOW RESULT IS COPIED , COSTVALUE IS 31186
> SHOW QUERYREWRITE - APPLIED RULES:
> SHOW MergeFromSelectOrView 1
>
>
> The statistics are up-to-date.
> Any tips would be welcome.
Hi Doug,
here we go...
What MaxDB version are you using? Did you check whether the DB parameters all comply to the recommendations?
If so, what are the cardinalities of the columns you indexed (a.k.a. how many different values do each of them contain?)
If the specification of BSART, BSTYP and EKORG does not reduce the number of rows to be retrieved to a large extent, then the indexaccess is likely to produce additional work.
Anyhow, the join order looks a bit odd here - this might be the problem caused by having set OPTIMIZE_OPERATOR_JOIN_COSTFUNC = YES in a MaxDB version between 7.6.04 and 7.6.06.
So make sure it's set to NO (see note 814704 MaxDB Version 7.6 parameter settings for OLTP/BW).
regards,
Lars -
Passing an argument in the SQL Query of a View Object
Hi,
It is possible that this question has been asked before, however I have searched for a half an hour in the forums and couldn't find a solution.
I am also new to using JDeveloper and ADF. Here's the situation:
I am developing an application that doesn't have to do anything else then displaying data from a database. Pretty straightforward actually.
Now I have made a vew pages with several collapsible panels (af:showDetailHeader) and have setup the datasources (or so I thought).
All that remains is:
- drag & drop a view object, from the application module that I created, onto the collabsible panels, so a child element gets created which displays data from the database.
- hack the layout so it looks like I want it to.
The problem that I have is the following:
I am using a 'User'-class that contains values I need when quering the database.
That User-object is part of a user-session.
What I want, for example, is to use the 'getPersonId()' function of that User-object and pass the argument to a SQL-query of a certain view-object.
The query would become something like:
'SELECT * FROM people WHERE people.personId = :someNumber'.
Now I've read some stuff about variable binding, which is complemented by something like (backing bean code):
getDBTransaction().getRootApplicationModule().getACertainViewObject().setWhereClauseParameter(1, user.getPersonId());
The examples I have found that might match my wishes are not using business components, but EJB's. I am having difficulty with understanding the 'how'-part of variable binding.
Also, I do not know enough of ADF to be able to create a situation like:
'User loads page, collapsible panel 1 is fully shown, the others are undisclosed.'
(meaning, that for panel1 a query has been executed.)
'User clicks on collapsible panel 2 which triggers a backingbean that somehow retrieves data from a view object'.
I would appreciate any help that somebody can give.
If it is not too much of a problem, please provide code snippets in case you have a solution. I am new to ADF :(.
-edit
I am using JDeveloper 10.1.3.3.0 in case that is of any importance.
Message was edited by:
Hugo BoogHello Stijn,
I didn't think about a referenced bean rule in the faces-config.
I added it right away and I am now able to set parameters of a View-object, not using a page button and before the page loads. You made my day!
In case anyone ever reads this post again, the summary of how to generate a table based on a View-object using dynamic parameters.:
1a: Go to faces-config.xml -> Overview tab'
1b: Go to the menuitem "Referenced Beans"
1c: Click on 'new' and select the existing bean you want to access data from and input a name. In this example I use name="user"
2: Create a View-object using the wizard.
2a: Specify the query you want in the menuitem 'SQL Statement'.
Add the 'parameters' you want to. You will have something like:
"SELECT * FROM someTable WHERE table.columnname LIKE :someArgument".
- hint: if you want the result to become something like:
"SELECT * FROM someTable WHERE table.columnname LIKE '%someArgument%'" then you have to add the '%'-characters in your code itself (read: someClass.setParameter("%" + someArgument);).
2b: In the menuitem 'Bind Variables' you have to add the variables you are referring to in the query. If you look at the query in 2a, then you have to add a variable with name "someArgument".
2c: Add the View-object to a Application Module (create one if nessecairy).
3a: Open a .jsp(x) file. Drag the View-object created in step 2 from the 'Data Controls'-pane to the page.
3b: Click on the '+' of the View-object in the 'Data Controls'-pane and open 'Operations' and drag 'ExecuteWithParams' to your page as a button.
3c: We do not want to use a button, the action has to be executed immediatly. So In the page source remove the lines that were created after dropping 'ExecuteWithParams'.
3d: Right-click on the page and select "Go to Page Definition".
3e: Go to the action id that is called 'ExecuteWithParams#', where # is a number.
Change the id to something useful.
3f: Change the NDValue so it corresponds with the value you want.
Example:
<action id="getAddressData" IterBinding="AddressesView1Iterator"
InstanceName="MyHRServiceModuleDataControl.AddressView1"
DataControl="MyHRServiceModuleDataControl" RequiresUpdateModel="true" Action="95">
<NamedData NDName="someArgument" NDType="java.lang.String"
NDValue="#{user.personId}"/>
</action>
Note: It is possible to use the value of a Backing Bean in NDValue.
Note 2: user is the bean I referred to in the faces-config.xml!
3g: Under the executables item, add an 'invokeAction' to pass the parameter to the View-object before your JSP-file loads:
<executables>
<invokeAction Binds="getAddressData"
id="loadAddressDataOfPersonIdInSession"
Refresh="prepareModel"/>
Thank Stijn Haus for this :) -
Sql query slow due to case statement on Joins
Hi
The sql query runs very slow for 30 min when the below case statement is added on the joins. Could you please let me know how to tune it. if the case statement is not there then it runs only for 1 min.
*( CASE*
WHEN PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 <> '1000'
THEN PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT1 || PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 || '_' || NVL(PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT6,'000')
WHEN DT_REQ_ALL.EMPMGMTCD IS NOT NULL AND
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 = '1000'
THEN DT_REQ_ALL.EMPMGMTCD
END =DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.MH_CHILD )
SELECT DISTINCT
D.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.RC_PARENT,
DT_REQ_ALL.FULL_NAME,
DT_REQ_ALL.EMP_COMPANY_CODE,
DT_REQ_ALL.EMP_COST_CENTER,
PO.PO_VENDORS.VENDOR_NAME,
PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.SEGMENT1,
PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE,
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT1,
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2,
PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CURRENCY_CODE,
PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_NUM,
PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_DATE,
(PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_AMOUNT* PO_Rates_GL_DR.CONVERSION_RATE),
(NVL(to_number(PO_DIST_ALL.AMOUNT_BILLED),0) * PO_Rates_GL_DR.CONVERSION_RATE),
PO_LINES_LOC.LINE_NUM,
GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS.NAME,
CASE
WHEN TRUNC(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE) > PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_DATE
THEN 1
ELSE 0
END ,
PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL.LINE_LOCATION_ID,
TRUNC(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE,'WW') + 8 WEEK_Ending
FROM
DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V,
PO.PO_VENDORS,
PO.PO_HEADERS_ALL PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2,
GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB,
AP.AP_INVOICES_ALL PO_INV_DIST_ALL,
PO.PO_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL PO_DIST_ALL,
PO.PO_LINES_ALL PO_LINES_LOC,
GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS,
PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL,
PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL,
AP.AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL PO_DIST_INV_DIST_ALL,
APPS.HR_OPERATING_UNITS,
PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL,
SELECT DISTINCT
PO_RDA.DISTRIBUTION_ID,
PO_RLA.requisition_line_id,
PO_RHA.DESCRIPTION PO_Descr,
PO_RHA.NOTE_TO_AUTHORIZER PO_Justification,
Req_Emp.FULL_NAME,
GL_CC.SEGMENT1 Req_Company_Code,
GL_CC.SEGMENT2 Req_Cost_Center,
Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT1 Emp_Company_Code,
Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT2 Emp_Cost_Center,
(Case
When GL_CC.SEGMENT2 <> 8000
Then TRUNC(GL_CC.SEGMENT1) || TRUNC(GL_CC.SEGMENT2) || '_' || NVL(GL_CC.SEGMENT6,'000')
Else TRUNC(Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT1) || TRUNC(Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT2) || '_' || NVL(Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT6,'000')
End) EmpMgmtCD
FROM
PO.po_requisition_lines_all PO_rla,
PO.po_requisition_headers_all PO_rha,
PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL po_RDA,
GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS gl_cc,
HR.PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F Req_Emp,
HR.PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F Req_Emp_Assign,
HR.hr_all_organization_units Req_Emp_Org,
HR.pay_cost_allocation_keyflex Req_Emp_CC
WHERE
PO_RDA.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = GL_CC.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and
PO_RLA.REQUISITION_LINE_ID = PO_RDA.REQUISITION_LINE_ID AND
PO_RLA.to_person_id = Req_Emp.PERSON_ID AND
PO_RLA.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = PO_RHA.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID AND
(trunc(PO_rla.CREATION_DATE) between Req_Emp.effective_start_date and Req_Emp.effective_end_date OR
Req_Emp.effective_start_date IS NULL) AND
Req_Emp.PERSON_ID = Req_Emp_Assign.PERSON_ID AND
Req_Emp_Assign.organization_id = Req_Emp_Org.organization_id AND
(trunc(PO_rla.CREATION_DATE) between Req_Emp_Assign.effective_start_date and Req_Emp_Assign.effective_end_date OR
Req_Emp_Assign.effective_start_date IS NULL) AND
Req_Emp_Assign.primary_flag = 'Y' AND
Req_Emp_Assign.assignment_type = 'E' AND
Req_Emp_Org.cost_allocation_keyflex_id = Req_Emp_CC.cost_allocation_keyflex_id
) DT_REQ_ALL,
SELECT
FROM_CURRENCY,
TO_CURRENCY,
CONVERSION_DATE,
CONVERSION_RATE
FROM GL.GL_DAILY_RATES
UNION
SELECT Distinct
'USD',
'USD',
CONVERSION_DATE,
1
FROM GL.GL_DAILY_RATES
) PO_Rates_GL_DR
WHERE
( PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=PO_DIST_ALL.CODE_COMBINATION_ID )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.LINE_LOCATION_ID=PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL.LINE_LOCATION_ID )
AND ( PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.VENDOR_ID=PO.PO_VENDORS.VENDOR_ID )
AND ( PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.ORG_ID=APPS.HR_OPERATING_UNITS.ORGANIZATION_ID )
AND ( GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID=APPS.HR_OPERATING_UNITS.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID )
AND ( PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CURRENCY_CODE=PO_Rates_GL_DR.FROM_CURRENCY )
AND ( trunc(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE)=PO_Rates_GL_DR.CONVERSION_DATE )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.REQ_DISTRIBUTION_ID=PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL.DISTRIBUTION_ID(+) )
AND ( PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID=PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID(+) )
AND ( PO_LINES_LOC.PO_HEADER_ID=PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.PO_HEADER_ID )
AND ( PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL.PO_LINE_ID=PO_LINES_LOC.PO_LINE_ID )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.REQ_DISTRIBUTION_ID=DT_REQ_ALL.DISTRIBUTION_ID(+) )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID=PO_DIST_INV_DIST_ALL.PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID(+) )
AND ( PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_ID(+)=PO_DIST_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_ID )
AND ( PO_INV_DIST_ALL.SOURCE(+) <> 'XML GATEWAY' )
AND
( NVL(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CANCEL_FLAG,'N') <> 'Y' )
AND
( NVL(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CLOSED_CODE, 'OPEN') <> 'FINALLY CLOSED' )
AND
( NVL(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.AUTHORIZATION_STATUS,'IN PROCESS') <> 'REJECTED' )
AND
( TRUNC(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE) BETWEEN TO_DATE('01-jan-2011') AND TO_DATE('04-jan-2011') )
AND
PO_Rates_GL_DR.TO_CURRENCY = 'USD'
AND
DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.RC_PARENT In ( 'Unavailable','Corp','Commercial' )
AND
( CASE
WHEN PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 <> '1000'
THEN PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT1 || PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 || '_' || NVL(PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT6,'000')
WHEN DT_REQ_ALL.EMPMGMTCD IS NOT NULL AND
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 = '1000'
THEN DT_REQ_ALL.EMPMGMTCD
END =DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.MH_CHILD )Explain plan. sorry can't get the explain plan from sql. this is from toad.
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 53,932 Bytes: 2,607 Cardinality: 1
79 HASH UNIQUE Cost: 53,932 Bytes: 2,607 Cardinality: 1
78 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 53,931 Bytes: 2,607 Cardinality: 1
75 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 53,928 Bytes: 2,560 Cardinality: 1
72 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 53,902 Bytes: 2,552 Cardinality: 1
69 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 53,900 Bytes: 2,533 Cardinality: 1
66 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 53,898 Bytes: 2,521 Cardinality: 1
63 HASH JOIN OUTER Cost: 53,896 Bytes: 2,509 Cardinality: 1
40 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL Cost: 3 Bytes: 26 Cardinality: 1
39 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,076 Bytes: 2,400 Cardinality: 1
37 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,073 Bytes: 2,374 Cardinality: 1
34 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,070 Bytes: 2,362 Cardinality: 1
31 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,066 Bytes: 2,347 Cardinality: 1
29 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,066 Bytes: 2,339 Cardinality: 1
26 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,065 Bytes: 2,312 Cardinality: 1
23 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,064 Bytes: 2,287 Cardinality: 1
20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,062 Bytes: 2,261 Cardinality: 1
17 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,056 Bytes: 6,678 Cardinality: 3
15 HASH JOIN Cost: 17,056 Bytes: 6,663 Cardinality: 3
13 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN Cost: 135 Bytes: 30,352 Cardinality: 14
5 VIEW VIEW DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V Cost: 4 Bytes: 2,128 Cardinality: 1
4 SORT UNIQUE Cost: 4 Cardinality: 1
3 UNION-ALL
1 REMOTE REMOTE SERIAL_FROM_REMOTE PRDFDW.WORLD
2 FAST DUAL Cost: 3 Cardinality: 1
12 BUFFER SORT Cost: 135 Bytes: 560 Cardinality: 14
11 VIEW DB2. Cost: 131 Bytes: 560 Cardinality: 14
10 SORT UNIQUE Cost: 131 Bytes: 310 Cardinality: 14
9 UNION-ALL
7 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GL.GL_DAILY_RATES Cost: 65 Bytes: 270 Cardinality: 9
6 INDEX SKIP SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GL.GL_DAILY_RATES_U1 Cost: 64 Cardinality: 1
8 INDEX SKIP SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GL.GL_DAILY_RATES_U1 Cost: 64 Bytes: 4,368 Cardinality: 546
14 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE PO.PO_HEADERS_ALL Cost: 16,920 Bytes: 32,754 Cardinality: 618
16 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_PK Cost: 0 Bytes: 5 Cardinality: 1
19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION Cost: 2 Bytes: 35 Cardinality: 1
18 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK2 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 2
22 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION Cost: 2 Bytes: 26 Cardinality: 1
21 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK2 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
25 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS Cost: 1 Bytes: 25 Cardinality: 1
24 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
28 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_VENDORS Cost: 1 Bytes: 27 Cardinality: 1
27 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) PO.PO_VENDORS_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
30 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNTS_TL_PK Cost: 0 Bytes: 8 Cardinality: 1
33 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_LINES_ALL Cost: 4 Bytes: 60 Cardinality: 4
32 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) PO.PO_LINES_U2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 4
36 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL Cost: 3 Bytes: 12 Cardinality: 1
35 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_N1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
38 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PO.PO_DISTRIBUTIONS_N1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
62 VIEW DB2. Cost: 36,819 Bytes: 1,090 Cardinality: 10
61 HASH UNIQUE Cost: 36,819 Bytes: 2,580 Cardinality: 10
60 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 36,818 Bytes: 2,580 Cardinality: 10
57 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 36,798 Bytes: 2,390 Cardinality: 10
54 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 36,768 Bytes: 2,220 Cardinality: 10
51 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 36,758 Bytes: 1,510 Cardinality: 10
48 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 36,747 Bytes: 1,050 Cardinality: 10
45 HASH JOIN Cost: 36,737 Bytes: 960 Cardinality: 10
43 HASH JOIN Cost: 34,602 Bytes: 230,340 Cardinality: 3,490
41 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE HR.PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F Cost: 1,284 Bytes: 1,848,420 Cardinality: 44,010
42 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL Cost: 31,802 Bytes: 18,340,080 Cardinality: 764,170
44 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE HR.PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F Cost: 2,134 Bytes: 822,540 Cardinality: 27,418
47 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS Cost: 1 Bytes: 9 Cardinality: 1
46 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_PK Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
50 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.PAY_COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX Cost: 1 Bytes: 46 Cardinality: 1
49 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.PAY_COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLE_PK Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
53 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_ALL Cost: 1 Bytes: 71 Cardinality: 1
52 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) PO.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
56 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL Cost: 3 Bytes: 17 Cardinality: 1
55 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_N1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
59 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS Cost: 2 Bytes: 19 Cardinality: 1
58 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
65 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL Cost: 2 Bytes: 12 Cardinality: 1
64 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
68 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL Cost: 2 Bytes: 12 Cardinality: 1
67 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
71 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS Cost: 2 Bytes: 19 Cardinality: 1
70 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
74 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AP.AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL Cost: 26 Bytes: 16 Cardinality: 2
73 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX AP.AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_N7 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 37
77 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AP.AP_INVOICES_ALL Cost: 3 Bytes: 47 Cardinality: 1
76 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AP.AP_INVOICES_U1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1 ThanksForming a new table "new_table" with 3 tables which particiapate in CASE statement logic.
with DT_REQ_ALL as
SELECT DISTINCT
PO_RDA.DISTRIBUTION_ID,
PO_RLA.requisition_line_id,
PO_RHA.DESCRIPTION PO_Descr,
PO_RHA.NOTE_TO_AUTHORIZER PO_Justification,
Req_Emp.FULL_NAME,
GL_CC.SEGMENT1 Req_Company_Code,
GL_CC.SEGMENT2 Req_Cost_Center,
Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT1 Emp_Company_Code,
Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT2 Emp_Cost_Center,
(Case
When GL_CC.SEGMENT2 8000
Then TRUNC(GL_CC.SEGMENT1) || TRUNC(GL_CC.SEGMENT2) || '_' || NVL(GL_CC.SEGMENT6,'000')
Else TRUNC(Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT1) || TRUNC(Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT2) || '_' || NVL(Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT6,'000')
End) EmpMgmtCD
FROM
PO.po_requisition_lines_all PO_rla,
PO.po_requisition_headers_all PO_rha,
PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL po_RDA,
GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS gl_cc,
HR.PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F Req_Emp,
HR.PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F Req_Emp_Assign,
HR.hr_all_organization_units Req_Emp_Org,
HR.pay_cost_allocation_keyflex Req_Emp_CC
WHERE
PO_RDA.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = GL_CC.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and
PO_RLA.REQUISITION_LINE_ID = PO_RDA.REQUISITION_LINE_ID AND
PO_RLA.to_person_id = Req_Emp.PERSON_ID AND
PO_RLA.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = PO_RHA.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID AND
(trunc(PO_rla.CREATION_DATE) between Req_Emp.effective_start_date and Req_Emp.effective_end_date OR
Req_Emp.effective_start_date IS NULL) AND
Req_Emp.PERSON_ID = Req_Emp_Assign.PERSON_ID AND
Req_Emp_Assign.organization_id = Req_Emp_Org.organization_id AND
(trunc(PO_rla.CREATION_DATE) between Req_Emp_Assign.effective_start_date and Req_Emp_Assign.effective_end_date OR
Req_Emp_Assign.effective_start_date IS NULL) AND
Req_Emp_Assign.primary_flag = 'Y' AND
Req_Emp_Assign.assignment_type = 'E' AND
Req_Emp_Org.cost_allocation_keyflex_id = Req_Emp_CC.cost_allocation_keyflex_id
SELECT DISTINCT
D.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.RC_PARENT,
DT_REQ_ALL.FULL_NAME,
DT_REQ_ALL.EMP_COMPANY_CODE,
DT_REQ_ALL.EMP_COST_CENTER,
PO.PO_VENDORS.VENDOR_NAME,
PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.SEGMENT1,
PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE,
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT1,
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2,
PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CURRENCY_CODE,
PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_NUM,
PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_DATE,
(PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_AMOUNT* PO_Rates_GL_DR.CONVERSION_RATE),
(NVL(to_number(PO_DIST_ALL.AMOUNT_BILLED),0) * PO_Rates_GL_DR.CONVERSION_RATE),
PO_LINES_LOC.LINE_NUM,
GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS.NAME,
CASE
WHEN TRUNC(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE) > PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_DATE
THEN 1
ELSE 0
END ,
PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL.LINE_LOCATION_ID,
TRUNC(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE,'WW') + 8 WEEK_Ending
FROM
( SELECT * FROM
DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V,
GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB,
DT_REQ_ALL
WHERE
DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.RC_PARENT In ( 'Unavailable','Corp','Commercial' )
AND
CASE
WHEN PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 <> '1000'
THEN PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT1 || PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 || '_' || NVL(PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT6,'000')
WHEN DT_REQ_ALL.EMPMGMTCD IS NOT NULL AND
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 = '1000'
THEN DT_REQ_ALL.EMPMGMTCD
END =DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.MH_CHILD
) new_table,
PO.PO_VENDORS,
PO.PO_HEADERS_ALL PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2,
AP.AP_INVOICES_ALL PO_INV_DIST_ALL,
PO.PO_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL PO_DIST_ALL,
PO.PO_LINES_ALL PO_LINES_LOC,
GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS,
PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL,
PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL,
AP.AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL PO_DIST_INV_DIST_ALL,
APPS.HR_OPERATING_UNITS,
PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL,
SELECT
FROM_CURRENCY,
TO_CURRENCY,
CONVERSION_DATE,
CONVERSION_RATE
FROM GL.GL_DAILY_RATES
UNION
SELECT Distinct
'USD',
'USD',
CONVERSION_DATE,
1
FROM GL.GL_DAILY_RATES
) PO_Rates_GL_DR
WHERE
( PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=PO_DIST_ALL.CODE_COMBINATION_ID )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.LINE_LOCATION_ID=PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL.LINE_LOCATION_ID )
AND ( PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.VENDOR_ID=PO.PO_VENDORS.VENDOR_ID )
AND ( PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.ORG_ID=APPS.HR_OPERATING_UNITS.ORGANIZATION_ID )
AND ( GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID=APPS.HR_OPERATING_UNITS.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID )
AND ( PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CURRENCY_CODE=PO_Rates_GL_DR.FROM_CURRENCY )
AND ( trunc(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE)=PO_Rates_GL_DR.CONVERSION_DATE )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.REQ_DISTRIBUTION_ID=PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL.DISTRIBUTION_ID(+) )
AND ( PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID=PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID(+) )
AND ( PO_LINES_LOC.PO_HEADER_ID=PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.PO_HEADER_ID )
AND ( PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL.PO_LINE_ID=PO_LINES_LOC.PO_LINE_ID )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.REQ_DISTRIBUTION_ID=DT_REQ_ALL.DISTRIBUTION_ID(+) )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID=PO_DIST_INV_DIST_ALL.PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID(+) )
AND ( PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_ID(+)=PO_DIST_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_ID )
AND ( PO_INV_DIST_ALL.SOURCE(+) 'XML GATEWAY' )
AND
( NVL(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CANCEL_FLAG,'N') 'Y' )
AND
( NVL(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CLOSED_CODE, 'OPEN') 'FINALLY CLOSED' )
AND
( NVL(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.AUTHORIZATION_STATUS,'IN PROCESS') 'REJECTED' )
AND
( TRUNC(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE) BETWEEN TO_DATE('01-jan-2011') AND TO_DATE('04-jan-2011') )
AND
PO_Rates_GL_DR.TO_CURRENCY = 'USD'
-
SQL Query (PL/SQL function body returning SQL query) when using to_char
we are trying to build a report page of Type SQL Query (PL/SQL function body returning SQL query).
our query is so simple, we need to extract the month from the recording_date column.
declare
l_query varchar2(1000);
begin
l_query:='select to_char(recording_date,'MM')from re_productive';
return l_query;
end;
but we are having the following problem for this query
Function returning SQL query: Query cannot be parsed within the Builder. If you believe your query is syntactically correct, check the generic columns checkbox below the region source to proceed without parsing.
(ORA-06550: line 4, column 42: PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "MON" when expecting one of the following: . ( * @ % & = - + ; < / > at in is mod remainder not rem <> or != or ~= >= <= <> and or like between || multiset member SUBMULTISET_ The symbol ". was inserted before "MON" to continue.)
Notes:
1-the query is correct and it was tested under Toad and SQL Plus.
2- we tried Use Generic Column Names (parse query at runtime only) option but we get the same problem.
any quick help please.Hi
You haven't escaped your quotes in the string. Try this...
DECLARE
l_query VARCHAR2(32767);
BEGIN
l_query:= 'select to_char(recording_date,''MM'') from re_productive';
RETURN l_query;
END;Cheers
Ben
Maybe you are looking for
-
What is difference between Reconciliation Account and Revenue account.?`
What is difference between Reconciliation Account and Revenue account.? Where does it effects after a sales order , delivery doc. or billing doc.?
-
I'm trying to use my iPad mini for the first time with a previous apple ID and password but it says "iTunes is not working try again"...it allowed me to download an app on my iPhone using the same apple ID & password but all my apps are in "Waiting S
-
Blackberry Torch 9810 Calendars
I have asked this question before, but I do not get the answer that I am looking for. Simple question, I want to delete all of my calendar entries without deleting any other program's. I do not want to reset my phone to the factory settings. Thank y
-
Can sqltaglib.tld execute Oracle stored procedure?
Is it possible to execute Oracle stored procedure through Oralce's own sqltaglib.tld. The sqltaglib on-line manual only shows how to run SQL query/insert/update statement. Thanks,
-
Problems with AIM on new iMac G5
Hi--Sorry if this is in the wrong place. I'm having an extremely frustrating problem with AIM, which I recently downloaded on my son's new iMac G5 (TIger 10.4.3). I've tried posting this question in the iChat forum, but since he doesn't use iChat and