MSI-7353 x48c Parts List/schematics?

I have had this board for a long time, and absolutely love it.
My cooling fan causes a small amount of 'flex' in the motherboard when installing it (removed every 3 months or so for cleaning) and a small part flew off the motherboard and into the nether.  I cannot find it anywhere.  It WAS a surface mount capacitor located near the edge of the board, labeled C9.
Of course, my board doesn't post now.
Does anyone know what part this is so I can replace it?  I have my soldering iron, flux, and solder all ready to go, but no part.
Any clues?

Quote from: Henry on 06-July-12, 14:33:50
Those tiny SM caps aren't IDd by value on MB or the part so one of use would have to ask MSI what the proper value of that part is.
Exactly, or a schematic may have parts list attached.  A picture would only show the pads it was soldered to and the 'C9' marking for it's identifier.

Similar Messages

  • Missing Parts List While creating Prd. Order

    Hi Friends,
    My client is creating production Orders Manually thru CO01and While Creating & Saving The Production Order System Is Not Supporting In Giving  Missing Parts list In spite Of Deficit of Un Restricted stock inStorage Location For BOM components used in that Order.
    To my surprise when the defisit is for all the BOM components only one component is showing as missing part in missing parts list.
    But While confirming the order The system is showing missing parts for all the components which are defisit for order confirmation.
    I Tried To Get This From the Following Method
    Checked For Define checking control In OPJK.
    Selected plant, Order type & selected the business function 1 for create or 2 for release. And Maintained These Settings
    a) Removed tick mark in No Availability check.
    b) Type of component check Given as - ATP check.
    c) Material release - 1. User decides on release if parts are missing.
    d) PP Checking rule (Which Is same As with plant parameter OPPQ)
    e) In Define scope of check (OPJJ) made a tick mark in check w/o RLT.
    Then Assigned the availability checking group at Mrp View of Header material.
    In spite Of All These Settings Still At The Time Of Order Release/Save A Warning Massage Or A Informative Massage Is Not Appearing
    *Please Suggestu2026u2026u2026u2026*
    hari

    Hi,
    Please check same checking rule use in Material master and with order type and plant?
    Check the cheking group in material master MRP3 view for all material.
    Go to Transection OPJJ - Maintain scope of check,
    Select your Checking rule which you have assing to your order type and tick INLCUDE RESERVATION.
    (1). CO24- Missing Parts Information System
    Under this transaction you choose Selection from Reservations and then select Plant & Material then you can get Missing Parts List for your respective material without production / planned order also.
    (2). COOIS : Production Order Information System
    Under this transaction you need to Select in List option as Components and then go on Selection Tab.
    For collective availability check use
    COHV - Excute the roport w ith collective avaliabilty check.
    COMAC.
    Hope this help.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Missing Part list for Plant to Plant Purchase order

    Hi,
          I need the following requirement in CO24,
          In CO24 its shows the missing parts for Sales order, similarly we want the missing parts list for Plant to Plant Purchase order in the same report. Also the report,
    1.It  should not consider the Planned order for a sales order.
    2.It should not consider the planned order which can be convert into purchase requisition.
    3.The procurement type should be "E" or "X".
    Kindly guide me is there any standard layout changes in available or any development we have to do.
    Thanks
    Muthamil Murugan.G

    Hi Purushothaman,
    If you have the following settings in OPJK:
    Plant                 XXXX
    Order Type       XXXX
    Availability Check    2
    [X]Status Check
    [X]Check material availability when saving order (may not need)
    Checking Rule        PP PP checking rule
    Component Check Type    ATP check
    Release material     2  Release permitted despite missing parts
    Then in COHV you try to mass release the order with the following parameter:
    List: Order Header
    Selection: Your selection criteria
    Mass processing:
    Function: Release
    Max. No.of Processes 99
    Save Log: Always
    Release control order: Collective Order Release
    Then after the order is released, you can find the missing part list of that order in CO03 menu path:
    Goto->Missing Parts->Missing parts list
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Rachel

  • Missing part list is incomplete while creating Production Order and 2 components are not shown in the list.

    Hi Team,
    We are facing issue for availability check. During creation of Production order, the missing part list is not complete and it should show componenet A in the Missing part list. Below is the details:
    Production Order quantity: 100 kg
    Componenet A required quantity: 100 kg
    MMBE Unrestricted qty: 1000 kg
    MMBE Reserved Quantity: 2000 kg
    So as per above figures component A should come as missing part during availability check. But it is not coming as missing part. Please check and give your inputs.

    Hello
    The results of availability check should NEVER be compared with MMBE. As already mentioned, transaction CO09 is more appropriate.
    Also, this issue has been already discussed on hundreds of threads in the past. See some examples below:
    Problem with missing parts list during production order creation
    issue in committing material for production order
    Material Availibility check in Production orders
    availability check
    order is not released
    As it is stated on the The SCN Rules of Engagement you should do some research before opening a thread. Therefore, please use the search tool or even google to search for similar problems before opening a thread.
    BR
    Caetano

  • Problem reading document part list (BOM)

    Hello!
    I am using FM 'CSAP_DOC_BOM_CREATE' to create a document part list (BOM), which works fine. But i have difficulties to read the Doc-BOM (using FM 'CSAP_DOC_BOM_READ' or 'CS_BOM_EXPL_DOC_V1'):
    -> the result-tables t_stpo (FM 'CSAP_DOC_BOM_READ' ) and stb (FM 'CS_BOM_EXPL_DOC_V1') do not contain the complete document number (type doknr), which means that e.g. leading 0 are missing. The DB-table STPO also not contains the complete document number! I need the complete document number to read further document details from draw.
    Does somebody have any advice? Thank you in advance!
    greetings
    Wolfgang

    There's a function module that takes care of that. Just search for it in SE37 (something like CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA... ).
    edit: CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT
    Edited by: Maen Anachronos on Sep 25, 2008 4:46 PM

  • T500: Keyboard service parts list, which manufacturer?

    Dear Community,
    The keyboard service parts list for the T500, located at http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=MIGR-71050, has a FRU column for each manufacturer, but doesn't specify which column belongs to which manufacturer (= manufacturer names are missing from the column headers)...
    Also, that page features 2 lists, without specifiying what the difference is.
    Does anybody know which is which, or could Lenovo staff fix that page, please?
    Thanks,
    -marc

    I just started having this issue in Windows 7 SP1 on a brand new ThinkPad W520 with a Mini Dock Plus Series 3 (170 W).
    If I have a keyboard plugged into the dock, and I undock and re-dock, the keyboard will no longer accept keystrokes.  
    It appears in the Device Manager as working correctly, but just ignores me.  
    Unplugging it from the USB port and plugging it into another USB port, either on the dock or on the laptop itself, has no effect.
    Undocking and re-docking again has no effect.
    The only way to get keystrokes back from any affected keyboard is to restart the machine, which is incredibly inconvenient!
    I have no trouble with any of the other hardware plugged into the dock, including a mouse and an external sound card.
    I have tried now with two totally different keyboards so I know the problem's not related to drivers for the keyboards themselves.
    I believe it actually doesn't work for ANY keyboard other than the laptop itself once you've undocked and redocked, even if it wasn't plugged in at all before the undocking/redocking, as long as *some* keyboard was.  (I'm not in a position to verify that right at the moment but I think that's the case.)
    Interestingly enough, using the ThinkPad USB Keyboard With TrackPoint (SK-8855), while the keys do nothing, the trackpoint mouse in it still works.  Bizarre!
    I've updated the BIOS, the Intel chipset driver, and the UltraNav driver, and these have had no impact at all.  I don't know what more to do, and this is a major, major productivity drain for me.

  • Scope of Check Variation in Missing Part list Production Order

    Hi,
    I have a problem that While creation or conversion from planned order to production order if i get missing part list i found that Scope of check is as Z6 and ZP (Checking rule).But when when i Release the same production order also am getting missing part list here when i check scope of check as Z6 and PP(Checking rule).
    Why this difference is coming,can any body tell the possible causes.
    Cheers,
    Kumar.S

    >
    KUMAR.S. wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > I have a problem that While creation or conversion from planned order to production order if i get missing part list i found that Scope of check is as Z6 and ZP (Checking rule).But when when i Release the same production order also am getting missing part list here when i check scope of check as Z6 and PP(Checking rule).
    >
    > Why this difference is coming,can any body tell the possible causes.
    >
    > Cheers,
    > Kumar.S
    Kumar,
    Its simple for creation and release of Production order different checking rule is used(This must be intentional). You check this in OPJK transaction,  check for your order type / Plant combination for Business function 1(Create) the checking rule assigned would be ZP, whereas for the same order type / Plant combination for Business function 2(Release) the checking rule would be PP.
    If you want the same, you can change it here. But I assume there must have been a purpose for this custom checking rule creation. You can find the scope of check difference between these 2 combinations in transaction OPJJ.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Production Order missing Part list error  date 1,857 is not convertable

    *Dear Experts*
    When i m  trying to check missing part list at production Order then system is showing the error
    The date 1,857 is not convertible (please correct) in Production order Missing part list.
    Rgds
    Pankaj Agarwal

    Dear ,
    System is throwing you this message beacue your FC calander is vaild till 2010 and asking you to put the date btn  FC valid from 2004 and FC valid to 2010.
    Goto -OP03-Select the Factory Calnder Tab in change mode  (pencil mode ) -Select the applicable calender  chek box-Double click this -Extende the validit date till 2020 or beyond so that u will not face not only in this particular issue but in many other txn later on .
    Agian -come back to OP03 main screen -Slect the Holiday calaner -Extende the same way  and reassing in Factory calander
    after this , do not forget to re-ssign this FC in respective plant in OP03-Plant assingment .
    Try and revert back
    Regards
    JH
    Edited by: Jiaul Haque on May 27, 2010 3:14 PM

  • Missing Part List !!

    HI
    Is there any std report to see the missing part list.
    I mean material issued to prod order and we wana see the shortage.
    Thank You

    in co11n or co15--from menu --u can check for any missing parts against prod. order..

  • "missing part list" releasing process order, but the material there is

    Hi dears,
    I’ve a strange problem.
    When i’m going to release a process order, the system give me a “missing part list”.
    The strange is the material indicated  in that list, a component of a phantom, is present in state free in the st. location indicate.
    Does anybody know what can be the problem?
    Thanks in advance,
    Juan

    Hi all,
    the problem was that the material was present in quantity lower than safety stock.
    For this reason, the system give me that advice.
    however thanks for the help.
    Best regards,
    Juan

  • How to create a part selection and a part list ALV in the same screen

    Hello,
    I will want to realize in a screen a part lists ALV and a part selection for the list.
    I have created a container with  a splitter , but I do not know how to carry out the selection part.
    Thank you for your assistance.
    Regards

    Hello
    If you want to have the selections and the ALV list displayed on the same dynrpo then create a dynpro that contains in the upper part the selection/input fields and in the lower part place a custom container for the ALV grid.
    If you want to be more flexible then you could use a subscreen for the selection/input fields.
    There is no point in using a splitter container because we cannot place normal input fields into a container but only controls.
    Regards
      Uwe

  • IDOC for missing parts list

    Hi,
    We would like to send the missing parts list generated from CO24 to other system. Is there any standard IDOC available to send missing parts?
    I would appreciate your help.
    Thanks.

    Karthik,
    Thanks for your quick reply. But this is not what I am looking out for. I am sorry, I think my question was not clear.
    There is one functionality in Production Planning area that we can find out the missing parts for the production order. We have to send the information to our warehouse asking for the missing parts to fulfill the production order. Our warehouse is not on SAP so we want to send the information through an ALE/IDOC. In order to do this I wanted to know that is there any standard IDOC type which can be used or we have to create a custom IDOC.
    Thanks.

  • How to create a Virtual part list for the particular assembly.

    Dear Gurus,
                        For our single purchasing order of particular assembly, we have multiple suppliers who can contribute in that Assembly. For example The purchasing order of Assembly X is given to supplier A and in that some part should be also ordered which should be delivered to supplier A from supplier B. In this situation, I want to create a virtual part list of the assembly which can be used to order both of this supplier seperately. So I do not forget to make purchasing order to the supplier B.
                       Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Mayur

    Dear Mayur,
    One of option for you is: using document draft as the template for the part list of supplier B.  Then create user alert whenever the supplier A need to be ordered.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Missing part list in plant maintenance ( CO 24)

    Hi SAP experts,
    Is it possible to use the transaction CO24 ( missing part list)  for plant maintenance orders? If yes, what are prerequesites & configurations needed for it?
    Regards

    Hi,
    I think CO24 can be used for Maintenance Orders too.... as there is no order category field mentioned in the selection screen.
    Try for one the PM order and check ... currently I don't have any PM order other wise I would have checked and let you know....
    Hope thsi will help you.
    regards
    radhak mk

  • Missing parts list variations

    Hi Guru's,
    When we checked the missing part list in the "COOISPI "report (Process Order infromation system) for the planned order and compared this with the missing parts in the MD12 for the particular planned Order, there was a differnece in number of entires (components) betwwne both these lists. why is the missing part list for MD12 and COOISPI is showing the difference?
    If anyone is familiar with this report please let me know what can be the reason for the difference. also can any explain the logic how this report does the availability check for the missing parts.
    Thanks,
    Nagesh.

    Dear Nagesh,
    1) For missing parts at plan order level check in MDVP ( Not in COOISPI )
    2) Compare MDVP with MD12
    3) AV check will carried out based on settings defined in OPJJ ( Combination of cheing group & checking rule )
    Regards
    Madhu Kumar

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to install Enterprise Library 2007 on Windows 7

    I need Enterprise Library 2007 for my project. When i try installing, it throws the error : Microsoft .Net 2.0 needed . I try to install microsoft .Net 2.0, then it throws the error : .Net 2.0 is already part of the operating system. I uninstalled .n

  • Failure to launch Camera Raw 5.2 correctly on a Mac with Elements 6?

    I downloaded and installed the Adobe Camera Raw application, and I read the readme and followed the instructions (although I'm not positive that I did it correctly). When I open Elements and then Camera Raw, the loading window for Camera Raw pops up

  • Profile for x86

    Hi I tried to create a profile for an x86 pc to jumpstart. But when I run "check", I get an error message. My sparc-profiles are working. The only difference between those profiles is the partitions: fdisk c1t0d0s0 4000 / fdisk c1t0d0s1 256 /swap fdi

  • PE6 wont import pics from my phone

    I am finding that there is something about the jpg's created on my phone that the browser in PE6 doesnt like, strangely it will import a few of them but not most, doesnt matter what method i use (drag and drop menus downloader, etc) the problem files

  • What's using up all my memory?

    Hi, I have a late-2011 MBP with 4GB of memory.  A minute ago I noticed that 72% of my memory was being used even though I had no applications running.  I restarted the computer, and as soon as it booted up it showed 40% was being used, again with no