MSI GeForce FX5700 TD128(non Ultra) MEMORY BANDWIDTH

Hello to all...
I have 1 question please. I want to know the real memory bandwidth for MSI
GeForce FX5700 TD128(memory: Samsung). I found on MSI website this :
GeForce FX 5700 Graphics Core: 256-bit
Memory Interface: 128-bit
Memory Bandwidth: 14.4GB/sec.
Fill Rate: 1.7 billion pixels/sec.
Vertices/sec. 356 million
Memory Data Rate: 550 MHz
Pixels per Clock (peak): 4
Textures per Pixel: 16
RAMDACs 400 MHz
in MSI FX Series Quick User's Guide i found No. for memory bandwidth 8,8!!! GB/sec(MSI GeForce FX5700 TD128)
Quick User's Guide Version: 5.0, November 2003, G52-V1NFX07
Please remail and explain.
Thanks
TT

14.4 is the bandwidth for the Ultra so I assume it isn't the same on the non ultra.
You can calculate it by finding the rated timing of the memory chips and therfore the memory clock (approximatly).
For instance 2.8ns (should be marked on the chip -28) is 1/2.8ns=357MHz.
Using DDR it is effectively 714MHz, and using 128bit wide BUS you get 11.4GB/S

Similar Messages

Radeon 128MB 9600XT DDR vs Geforce Fx5700-TD128 8x AGP 128MB

could u tell me what graphicsd card would give me the best perormacnce from my current pc configuration
Radeon 128MB 9600XT DDR
or the
Geforce Fx5700-TD128 8x AGP 128MB

Hi got an Asus 9600xt core speed stock is 500 but can be whacked up well above that, Had mine at 550 and the memory to 340 (680). easy to overclock with the Rage 3d drivers. Gets well into the 4000 in 3d mark and over 32000 in aquamark...Used to use Nvidia but no way now!
And it runs cool and came with masses of software and half life 2 voucher.
Spanks the 5700 in every way including price at just over £100.
But still would prefer a 9800 pro they liquidate all the opposition

New series GEFORCE FX5700-TD128, 128MB is 64bit!!??

i buy new MSI FX5700-TD128 (not LE) and Riva Tuner show only 64bit memory bus!
performance on 3dmark is very low 2200 points on XP2500+,512MB RAM
if i try other FX5700 from Gigabyte RivaTuner show 128bit and performance is more better!
why MSI lie?! FX5700-TD128 should be have 128bit memory bus! not 64!

m4r3k,
Manuals for hardware are generic, and include multiple models of hardware.
If you look at the two links above, I listed both the 64bit memory version and the 128bit memory version and I asked you which one you had. You never told me.
If you do not give detailed answers I cannot help you. If you have a website that says your card is supposed to be 128bit memory, link it. If you have a copy of your manual online, link it. Till then, look at these two links for manuals:
FX5700-TD128Q (128bit) Manual
and
FX5700-VTD128 Manual
(Just in case you did not notice in the links to the two manuals are the SAME LINK. So like I said, generic manauls. This is the industry standard.)
Take Care,
Richard

MSI Geforce 8800GTX 768mb OC Edition memory bus

In the nvidia control panel the memory bus (Factory shipped clock frequencies setting) is set to 1000 instead of 2000! Core bus is normal to 610. I also realized that if i increase the memory speed it goes only up to 1200? Remember, this is the OC Edition! Any suggestions? (Drivers installed: 162.22 vista 64bit)

Quote from: flobelix on 20-July-07, 03:32:33
Well... NO! control panel shows real clock 1000mhz, that's 2000mhz effective ( 1000mhz DoubleDataRate = 1000 x 2 = 2000!). So don't worry everything's ok.
Thanks man!

5900 Non Ultra

hello,
I tried to update my MSI Geforce Fx 5900 Non ultra 128mb bios from Rev 1 to Rev2 and also tried from REV 1 to Rev3. Both times it tells me Error:Board ID mismatch firmware update (3505) and Board ID (3500). But when i try to change bios from REV1 to the same REV1 it works. I want to update my bios because it seemed to help a lot of people.
Can anyone help?
Thanks

So can I flash the bios?

Msi Fx5700 Td128 Memory Bandwidth

Hello to all!
Please tell me the MEMORY BANDWIDTH for this card:
MSI GeForce FX5700(non Ultra) TD128
memory implemented: SAMSUNG
On website is 14,4GB/s , but in Quick Users Guide 8,8GB/s.
What No. is the right No.?
Please answer someone...

14.4 is the bandwidth for the Ultra so I assume it isn't the same on the non ultra.
You can calculate it by finding the rated timing of the memory chips and therfore the memory clock (approximatly).
For instance 2.8ns (should be marked on the chip -28) is 1/2.8ns=357MHz.
Using DDR it is effectively 714MHz, and using 128bit wide BUS you get 11.4GB/S

MSI GF FX5900 TD128 Problems

I recently bought a new GeForce FX5900 TD128 from MSI and I am having a couple of problems. I am geeting some frequent crashes in games such as Morrowind (every 30 minutes to every hours). The problem is the same in other 3D applications. Could the problem be related to DirectX9.0a? Should I reinstall DirectX8.1? Should I try seeting the BIOS (and the card) to AGP 4X? Or is the card deffective (It runs fine in 2D applications and on the desktop).
here are my system specifications:
Motherboard: MSI K7N2 Delta-ILSR (Original BIOS)
CPU: AMD Athlon XP 3000+
Memory: 2X512K of Crucial DDR400 (Non Dual-Channel)
Graphic card: MSI GeForce FX5900 TD128 (Nvidia's 4.4.0.3 drivers)
Screen: Samsung Flat 19"
Sound: Onboard sound
Power Supply: Antec 480W

Sorry for getting back to you so late. I had to travel a bit for work. My card is set at AGP 4X and everything is fine. Thanks a lot. It's always the same thing when you buy new hardware... You got to be patient. At least, I got less problems then my friend with his new Radeon 9800 that crashes all the time :D.
By the way, sorry for my bad english... I come from Montreal and I'm french canadian... It's been a long time since I had to write in English...
Thanks again

GF FX5200-TD128 Memory Bandwidth

What is the Memory Bandwidth of the MSI FX5200-TD128?
and FX5200-T128?
and FX5200-TDR128?

The memory bandwidth is the amount of data that can be transferred from and to the memory in a second. On the FX 5200, the theorical bandwidth is 6.4 GB/s

Is nVidia Geforce GT640 good graphics card for PrE10 despite low memory bandwidth?

Can anybody confirm that the nVidia Geforce GT640 is a reasonable graphics card for Premiere Elements 10 and Photoshop Elements 10?
The person who assembled my Core i7 3770K desktop with 16Gb of RAM at 1600mHz installed the nVidia GT640 card with 2Gb of DDR3 memory. He said that this was a good (fairly low cost) card for video editing because it has 384 CUDA cores - very helpful in video editing. I am pretty ignorant about graphics cards, but like the low power usage, 65 watts, and reputed cool operating temperatures. I have since read that DDR5 memory would have been much faster because of greater memory bandwidth - say 80-90Gb per second compared with 28.5Gb per second for the DDR3 memory on the GT640 card. I was after economical power use. DDR5 cards use 110 watts upwards and run much hotter than DDR 3 cards, all other things being equal. The really fast cards require special power units and cooling.
Does anybody know whether limited memory bandwidth is important in video editing? Is speed much more critical in gaming than in video editing? Are other attributes such as 384 CUDA cores, nvenc syncing, dedicated encodment, 28nm Kepler architecture, 2Gb memory frame buffer, 1.3 billion transistors, plenty of texture units - more important than memory bandwidth in video editing? Does bandwidth limited by DDR3 memory affect quality of image?
I read that the GT640 would be much faster (producing better image quality?) than the HD4000 integrated Intel graphics of the Core i7 Ivy Bridge processor. Is this so?
Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit and all programs are installed on a 120Gb OCZ Agility 3 solid state drive. My data drive is a 1Tb Seagate SATA 3 at 7200 RPM. I have a beautiful 21 inch ASUS vs228n LED monitor and LG blu-ray burner.
I did lots of editing with PrE 3 with a Dell 3.06 gHz hyperthreading desktop and Win XP. The output and even the preview monitoring was clear and stable. I am still capturing standard definition mini dv tape by firewire from a 3MOS Panasonic handycam, but plan to upgrade to HD 3MOS with flash memory. I make the preview monitor really small - about 7cm wide - in PR10, because the quality of the preview picture is much poorer than the quality that I experienced with the Premiere Elements 3 program with Win XP. Is this just an indication of memory-saving in PrE 10 previews? I expect output to be much superior, although still mpeg2-DVD quality until I upgrade my camera. I have set rendering on maximum bitrate.
Anyway, despite these reservations with preview quality, the GT640 seems to be performing fine. Picture quality in Photoshop, online and elsewhere on my computer is excellent.
I updated the nVidia display driver only yesterday to version 306.23.
Nearly all graphics cards forums are about gaming. I hope to see more forums about graphics in editing here.
What do you think of the 2Gb nVidia GT640 for editing with PrE 10 and Photoshop Elements 10? What would you say about picture quality in the PrE 10 monitor versus quality of output? Was picture quality in the PrE 3 monitor sharper and more stable, as I imagine?
Regards, Phil

Sheltie,
Thank you for the kind words. We all work very hard to help others with video-editing. Some of us also show up on other Adobe forums, depending on the products that we use most often.
Besides helping out, I also find that I learn something new every day, even about programs that I have used for decades. Heck, I just learned something new about PrE vs PrPro (my main NLE program), when I went to try and help a user. I probably actually use PrE more to test my theories, or to replicate a user's problem, than I do to actually edit my videos. Still, when applicable, I do real work in the program.
With about a dozen "regulars" here, if one of us is not around, several more usually are. Personally, I do not understand how Steve Grisetti and John T. can dedicate so very much time here. Steve is a noted author of books on PrE, PSE, Sony DVD Architect, and others, plus helps run a video/photography Web site, Muvipix.com, that is very active, and has so very much to offer. John T. is always under the watchful eye of The JobJarQueen, and gets dragged, kicking and screaming, out into the yard, or up on his roof, so can be gone for a bit.
Neale usually beats us all, since he's in the UK, and normally answers all the questions, that come in too late for us to see. He is also a PrE power-user, so beats me hands down.
I travel a great deal, but no one ever misses me. Was supposed to do a trip to Sydney last Dec., but had to cancel. Have not gotten details on the reschedule of that trip, but it would have been my first jaunt south of the Equator. Gotta' make that happen.
Good luck, and happy editing,
Hunt

MSI K3 ultra 2 vs MSI GeForce FX 5200

My computer crashes all the time since i installed a new vga card (MSI GeForce FX 5200 TDR 128) on my MSI K3 ultra 2 main card. Os is XP pro.
I've got all the latest drivers etc...
Anyone with similar problems or sollutions to this
small problem?

psu ? is it the cpu
Her is all data:
MSI K3 ULTRA 2
MSI GeFORCE 5200 FX TDR 128
AMD ATHLON XP 2100 +
RAM 512 MB PC 2700 DDR 333MHz CL.2.5
RAM 512 MB PC 2700 DDR 333MHz CL.2.5
HD, WESTERN CAVIAR 80GB SE
XP PRO
Sorry power supply 340 W

Msi fx5700-td128 vs td128q

Hi!
Whats the diference between a Msi FX5700-TD128 and a Msi FX 5700-TD128q?
Why there's no q-less version in the main products page from Msi but yes in
other like msimiami that is from where i would be getting mine?
Thanks.

Is your card a OEM i.e. the cheaper, no box and/or no software bundle version?

MSI swindle? (MSI gf4 mx420d-t memory bandwidth)

I've just bought an MSI gf4 mx420d-t based on their site specs, specificly the memory bandwith. They advertise 5.3GB/second memory bandwidth.
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/vga/vga/pro_vga_detail.php?UID=323&MODEL=MS-8878
When i checked the nvidia site, the mx420 chip has only 2.7GB/second memory bandwidth, but there is another chip, the mx440se which matched exactly with the memory bandwidth advertized in MSI site, so i thought that was the chip of the mentioned card.
When i took a look to the manual (after i bought it ?( 8o ;( ) the specs for my model were: 2.7GB/second memory bandwidth.
I really hope that the manual has an error (as it happened with the nforce clearcmos jumper thing) or else it's a big swindle (I had cheaper options, only bought it considering this matter).
Can someone clear this?

I am experiencing the same problem with 3DTurbo. Possiblty that feature only works for other MSI vidcards.

Msi geforce fx 5800 ultra

found a few pictures of msi geforce fx
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/20030301/etc_gfxdemo.html

looks like pics will all most people will see of that card.
02/28/03 - nVidia lost MSI to ATI
nVidia estimates trimmed on large design loss. Friedman, Billings, Ramsey has learned that nVidia has lost a large design win at MSI (one of its largest customers) to ATI; firm now believes that other designs at MSI are at risk, given that they had been an nVidia-exclusive customer; additionally, firm believes nVidia's new GeForce FX line will ramp more slowly than expected due to low yields on both discrete and board-level products.
taken from
http://www.amdboard.com/

This 5700 non ultra kinda blows

I recently got the Geforce FX 5700 td128.. it's not the LE or the ultra..
It was to replace my geforce 4 ti4400 with 128. The fan was going out on it. I figured the 5700 would smoke it but it's actually taking performance hits up the yazoo. It can't seem to handle bump mapping. I ran a 3dmarks03 on it and I got about 2301 which sounds like a better rating then I got on the ti card but yet the ti card handled bump mapping fine. Now I have to disable bump mapping in games like Hitman contracts and Bloodrayne. Otherwise it's butt slow. I swear i'm even getting a lil lag even on my desktop.
I used nvidia's latest drivers that were released two weeks ago. I also played with directx 9c. No change.. I then tried the detonator drivers released in april on a clean install.. no change.. Soo now I'm using the most current msi drivers for the card.. a little better. But I notice the slow down each time the level starts then it seems to build back up. It's just like the card has a bit of a lag.
Prolly should saved up the extra 50 and gotten the 5900xt or whatever it is.. sigh..

Quote
Well first off your processor is a 2.8 running at what was it.. 800mhz? I'm running a 2.53 running at 533 mhz. Second.. yer running the MSI FX5700 VTD256 while I'm running the MSI FX5700 TD128. So you have twice the ram which I'm sure makes a difference and a higher end processor and if I remember right that plays a factor.. Isn't the 256 model the ultra?
Hey Deviancy... first off yes I do have a higher spec processor compared to you, but that shouldn't influence your 3dm03 scores (and it doesn't BTW). The card I have isn't an ultra version either.. its a regular 5700 with 256MB VRAM with the same default frequencies (425 core/ 500 mem).... and the 256MB version is only marginally better at normal resolutions used in 3dm03. Not for the sake of arguing... just pointing out the facts. :hypecrite:
I would recommend that you get a 5900XT or a 9800pro if you decide to change your card, though before you do so try to check the frequencies at which the card is operating... I've never heard of an under clocked 5700 that isn't an LE , but its worth a try... If nothing works, you can try either formatting your computer or jsut giving up on the card... Like I said before, it could well be a faulty card..
Cheers!!

MSI GeForce FX 5200 bios config???

I just bought a msi geforcefx 5200 (TDR-128), and I'd like to know what is the best configuration I can put on my bios (MSI K7N2 DL)?
AGP clock? 66-120
AGP Voltage? 1.5-1.7
AGP fastwrite? Enable/disable
Video cache? Enable/disable
Graphic Aperture Size? 64-512
PCI...? 32-128 and so on...
I was runing on default (agp clock 66 volt 1.5 fastwrite enable video cache disable and grap apert 64 pci 32) and the games has some kind of lockups of miliseconds :(
I tryed to rase the graphic aperture size to 128, the pci to 128 and video cachable to enable but no fix, please should i change the agp clock and voltage.
Ps.: i also tryed to disable the fastwrite but no fix :P

The AGP clock should be left to its default setting, as well as the AGP voltage, except if you want to overclock your card´s memory, it could give you some help
AGP FastWrite should be enabled, it could deliver in a performance gain
SideBand Adressing will not be available if the card runs at AGP 8X (AGP 3.00 disables it) and as your mobo supports AGP 8X (nFORCE2) don´t enable it.
Video Cache gives no performace gain, except on DOS, it´s useless as well as System BIOS Cache.
AGP Aperture Size should be set at 128 MB, anything bigger is completely useless
And the PCI Latency Timer leave it in its default setting or in 64 clocks
Don´t touch the AGP speed or voltage because it will give you more problems than solutions. Try latest nVIDIA ForceWare drivers, latest nFORCE drivers and see if the problem remains.
Good Luck!
AMD AthlonXP 2000+ T-bred A
ASUS A7A266 1012 BIOS (ALi M1647)
1 stick of 256 MB PC2700U CAS 2.5 (CAS 2 at 266 MHz) 6-2-2
MSI Geforce FX 5200 8907-TD128 128 MB
WD400BB 40 GB ATA100 7.2k rpm
NOGA (?) 300W PSU
WinXP Pro
MSI 53.03

MSI GeForce FX5700 TD128(non Ultra) MEMORY BANDWIDTH

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for