MSI K9A Platinum and VIA drivers issue? XP 0x0000007B stop error.

I get a Windows Stop error when trying to boot into Windows XP with new components. The SATA hard drive (and Windows XP installation) is from the old computer.
The new computer components are:
MB: MSI K9A Platinum, chipset: RD580 (North Bridge), SB600 (South Bridge)
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 x2 5600+, boxed (the cooler and fan came with the CPU).
Video: MSI Radeon 1950 XTX
The old (and working) computer setup is:
OS: XP Professional
MB: Abit AV8-3rd Eye, chipset: VIA K8T800Pro + VT8237
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 3500+
Video: Sapphire Radeon 9800Pro All-in-Wonder, videodriver: atidvag.dll version 6.14.10.6542
HD: Maxtor 6B200M0 SCSI Disk Device
BIOS: Phoenix 6.00PG 20.04.2005
System drivers with "via" in the name: VIAAGP1.SYS, viaide.sys, viasride.sys
VIA 4in1 (Hyperion) version: 4.55 (that can be found at HKEY_Local_Machine\Software\Via4in1Driver).
VIA 2.20e SATA/RAID driver was used when installing this computer setup.
The precise stop error is:
0x0000007B (0xba4c3528, 0xc0000034, 0x00000000, 0x00000000)
From many sites I have gathered that the error is related to Windows XP not being able to access a critical system drive. Most probably the SATA hard drive issue.
The problem probably is the VIA drivers of the old motherboard and/or the SATA driver.
First I should mention, that MSI K9A Platinum does not have a hard disk SATA driver. If it does, I have been unable to find one. Certainly no such floppy disk included, and no such driver in the MSI's Web page for this motherboard.
Second important point: I never used RAID. I did use VIA 2.20e SATA/RAID driver disk when installing Windows XP to the old computer.
Strange that the hard drive model is reported as a "SCSI Disk Device". It's not a SCSI drive however: it's a SATA disk.
I have tried to uninstal the motherboard chipset drivers (Hyperion v4.55), but there seems to be a bug here: the drivers should be uninstalled using the installation program, and select the uninstall option. However, I do not get the uninstallation option to choose at all! Yes, I'm using the normal installation mode, not the quick installation (although tried that, too). The Hyperion setup program just installs, and asks to reboot the computer. After rebooting and trying again, it still does not offer me an uninstallation choise.
I know how to install hard drive VIA SATA driver, but I have no idea how to uninstall it. And I'm afraid to do that without certainty that it IS the solution, since I could not access the hard drive any more in the old computer setup (and return to read this forum). Also, I do not have a floppy drive any more. Anyone know if there is an issue with K9A and XP having VIA SATA driver installed?
When I tried the new computer setup, I first tried the simplest possible hardware combination: there were no CD/DVD-drives, no (parallel)IDE hard drives, and no PCI cards, except the MSI video adapter.
My BIOS Setup experiments. None of these helped: got the same stop error each time.
1) I didn't much touch the BIOS setting first. Just tried to boot with the settings BIOS came with.
2) Next I disabled the integrated audio, LAN and IEE1394 devices and floppy drive and disabled all other choises except the SATA drive as a boot device.
3) Next I tried with the fail-safe BIOS defaults.
4) Cleared CMOS.
5) Changed OnChip SATA type from Native IDE to Legacy IDE. (Only one boot attempt with the setting as Legacy.)
6) Disabled PCI IDE BusMaster.
7) Never touched anything in the Cell Menu: so the settings are in minimum.
A step I have taken after the last attempt: run Windows XP hard drive error-checking tool to every logical drive with the fix option selected, and the system drive also with scan the bad sectors option selected.
My plans next are:
1) to install a newer Hyperion driver. If that would correct the no-unistallation-choice-bug,
2) to disable USB-devices in the BIOS (desperate),
3) to choose the Windows general video display driver (although I seriously doubt this is a display driver problem!).
4) to uninstall the Anti-Virus software (Avira Antivir).
I've read a numerous Web pages so far about the 0x0000007B stop error. Here are some links:
Quote
http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/support/knowledge_base/
Stop 0x0000007B or INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE
This Stop message, also known as Stop 0x7B, indicates that Windows XP Professional lost access to the system volume or boot volume during the startup process. This error always occurs while the system is starting and is often caused by one of the following:
    * Hardware problems
    * Corrupted or incompatible storage drivers
    * File system problems
    * Boot sector viruses
    * Outdated firmware
During I/O system initialization, this error can occur when:
    * The controller or driver for the startup device (typically the hard disk) failed to initialize the necessary hardware.
    * File system initialization failed because the system did not recognize the data on the boot device.
Quote
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314082
You receive a Stop 0x0000007B error after you move the Windows XP system disk to another computer
SYMPTOMS
After you move the Microsoft Windows XP system (boot) disk to a backup computer, you may receive the following Stop error when you try to start the Windows XP-based backup computer:
STOP: 0x0000007B (0xF741B84C,0xC0000034,0x00000000,0x00000000)
CAUSE
This error may occur if the registry entries and the drivers for the mass storage controller hardware in the backup computer are not installed in Windows XP.
RESOLUTION
To resolve this error, use the same hardware for the backup computer.
Heh, heh! Very nice Microsoft, but I plan to update my computer, so I NEED to use different components
Quote
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/324103
Device Driver Issues
You may receive a "Stop 0x0000007B" error message in the following scenarios:
•   A device driver that the computer boot controller needs is not configured to start during the startup process.
•   A device driver that the computer boot controller needs is corrupted.
•   Information in the Windows XP registry (information related to how the device drivers load during startup) is corrupted.
Hardware Issues
You may receive a "Stop 0x0000007B" error message if there is a resource conflict between the boot controller and another controller or between SCSI devices. You may also receive this Stop error message if drive translation is not being performed or if drive translation was changed. To troubleshoot this issue:
1.   If an IRQ or I/O port address conflict exists between the boot controller and another controller, Windows XP either stops responding (hangs) or displays a "Stop 0x0000007B" error message. If you recently added new hardware, remove the new hardware or reconfigure it so that it does not conflict with the resources of any other installed controllers.
2.   If you are using a SCSI hard disk, check the SCSI chain for correct termination. Remove any unused SCSI devices or make sure that each SCSI ID is unique.
3.   Make sure that drive translation is turned on (if it is required) and that it has not been changed. For example, if you recently switched controllers, this issue may occur. For additional information about this issue, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: 314082.
Quote
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316401/
SYMPTOMS
When you start your Microsoft Windows XP-based computer after you replace the motherboard on the computer, you may receive a Stop error message that is similar to the following:
STOP 0x0000007B INACCESSABLE_BOOT_DEVICE
CAUSE
This issue may occur if the new motherboard contains an embedded IDE controller that has a different chipset than the original motherboard.
RESOLUTION
Method 1: Perform an in-place upgrade of Windows XP [<- That means repair installation of Windows XP]
•   Do not use a repair or in-place upgrade if you suspect disk problems.
Method 2: Repartition and format your hard disk and reinstall Windows XP

Alright I got the situation over.
Quote from: Roskaposti on 19-May-07, 04:44:59
My plans next are:
1) to install a newer Hyperion driver. If that would correct the no-unistallation-choice-bug,
2) to disable USB-devices in the BIOS (desperate),
3) to choose the Windows general video display driver (although I seriously doubt this is a display driver problem!).
4) to uninstall the Anti-Virus software (Avira Antivir).
I did try all all the above, and none of them helped.
And by the way: after installing the new Hyperion (VIA chipset drivers), I was finally able to also uninstall. It also uninstalled the IDE SATA (I think) and PATA drivers.
But what I had to do, was to make a REPAIR installation of Windows XP.
So, I was wondering now afterwards: this is really, really silly. Why the hell we need to re-install Windows if we move the SYSTEM SATA drive to another computer? We don't have similar problem with parallel IDE drives. Whom should we thank here??
The issue is to insert the driver files and the information of the ide drivers Windows should use with the next boot. How can it be this difficult?
What you basically need is..
- the information about the new chipset's PCIIDE.SYS/[VENDOR_PROVIDED_FILE].SYS and ATAPIIDE.SYS inserted into the values in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSetXXX\Control\CriticalDeviceDatabase
- and the vendor's IDE drivers to the %SYSTEMROOT%/System32/drivers folder.
Maybe something else, I don't know. But the problem was, Windows didn't know how, or what drivers to use. That can't be so big problem you need to install the whole OS anew!

Similar Messages

  • MOVED: K9A Platinum and Vista 64 issues

    This topic has been moved to Vista problems.
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=109584.0

    Quote from: Paul B on 20-March-08, 23:05:39
    Hi all,
    Ok so I said I'd report back once all working and here i am (touches wood  )
    So my system is now Phenom less, I'm a bit gutted it's going back for RMA for refund. I have in the mean time replaced it with an x2 5000+ BE.
    So just a recap on my spec
    K9a2 Platinum
    x2 5000+ BE Running stock 2.6Ghz
    8GB OCZ DDR2 800 Platinum
    2 x 3870x2 in crossfire X mode.
    Windows Vista x64 OEM
    This OS now installed no issues no BSOD for secondary clock interrupt. But i did have issues installing it on the Promise raid array. Though it was the old more than 2GB ram thing so did the install with one stick and then Patch vista install the other 6GB but no still got system rebooting after the progress bar 9 times out of 10.
    So i have the HDDs on the standard SB600 sata ports as individual drives, installed x64 all 8GB still installed. Not knowing yet if it was driver related I let vista install all the drivers, the only other driver my system needed were the cat 8.3s and I only installed the graphics driver and CCC not the IDE or north bridge filter as the system is using vistas default drivers.
    I have installed all updates and everything seems rock solid. (touches more wood!!) I have spent the last week relentlessly trying to get this OS installed,  but hey I learnt a few things along the way..
    Paul
    But now it is and I have my 8GB and crossfire X I'm happy and when the good Phenoms arrive I'll get one but I'll read all the reviews on the web first....
    Hi,
    Right then resurecting an oldish thread, I have just purchased a Phenom 9750 and installed with the new 1.4 bios, and all is well. The same Vista x64 install is rock solid and damn quick now.
    Buy the B3 Phenoms with confidence they (AMD) have pulled back some ground and in my case some confidence.
    Paul

  • Please recommend OC settings for MSI K9A Platinum and AM2 6000+

    OS is Vista Ultimate x64.  BIOS revision is 1.7.
    Memory is Corsair XMS DDR2-800 5-5-5-18-2T.  I have 2 Diamond HD2900XT's in crossfire default clocks 825/1075 using driver 7.10.  At stock everything runs stable.  No crashes in any games.  I have a 92mm intake fan feeding the two video cards which exhaust out the back.  PSU is the PC Power and Cooling 750 single rail.  CPU heatsink is stock.
    I am really only looking to OC the CPU.  So does anyone with the same motherboard haven any recommendations?  Or any of you skilled overclockers?

    Holy mother of thread resurrections!
    Open up a new topic if you have any problems, do not revive old ones.
    Thank you.
    Quote from: flobelix on 20-May-08, 21:35:17
    Conclusion: Don't post in a dead thread! If you need help create your own one. Just to add: The easiest way to prevent guys from helping you is to offend 'em. Better keep that in mind when posting again.
    I have to agree. Never bite the ass of the helping hand...

  • MSI DKA790GX Platinum and AM3 CPU - BIOS Update

    Hi,
    I am going to upgrade my current computer from an older AMD socket 939 setup to an AMD Phenom II based system
    I am thinking of the MSI DKA790GX Platinum motherboard and AMD Phenom II X3 720 (Black edition) CPU (AM2+ Motherboard and AM3 CPU), but I need to clear up the BIOS update for AM3 issue before buying the components.
    The motherboard advertisement states that the BIOS has to be upgraded to support AM3 CPU
    My issue is this: I do not have an AM2/AM2+ CPU, and I am looking to jump right into buying an AM3 CPU - so will the unit power-up/POST with the combination of the newer AM3 CPU and older BIOS to allow me to update the BIOS using either FDD or Bootable USB Pen in a DOS environment?
    Does anyone have any knowledge or experience of this? Any help on this would be appreciated
    Thanks

    Quote from: Scottike on 12-April-09, 00:18:13
         The 1.74 Bios is one I got from MSI tech support.  We're trying to work through a problem with my new board. nothing major, but we're not quite there yet.
    I know that Nvidia was The chipset to have for several years, but I think AMD has upset that applecart a bit with the 780 & now 790 chipsets, and with Intel
    getting into the chipset game as well, Nvidia could see some rough times ahead.  They may even end up dropping out of the chipset game, since Intel's new CPUs have the memory controller built on die.  Hence, Intel has no real need for NVidia any more, Nvidia may end up just focusing on the video card market, unless?
         My board defaults to 800mhz as well and I'm running a 720. You have to keep in mind that they have to make the boards default to the lowest common denominator as not everyone runs 1066 capable memory on their board (even though Manufacturers may spec the memory so). I also have to manually bump up the voltage, as well as timings and ratio for 1066.  But, my Mushkin ram plugged in and booted with no problems, but I did have to bump up the voltage and tighten up the timings even at 800.
    Interesting (Abut BIOS version 1.74). I guess it is not yet available for downloads.
    So now Intel CPU's have the memory controller on the die (just like AMD). So does this prove as an advantageous concept? I expect Intel to implement better memory management than AMD. AMD drops speed when all 4 memory banks are occupied... what is the use of utilizing max RAM capability if memory controller cannot sustain the max RAM speed?
    I may agree with you on the concept that motherboard should support the lowest (RAM) denominator...
    However if someone uses lower than 1066 MHz sticks, system should detect accordingly, and when 1066 sticks are used, auto-detect as 1066... I still do not see the issue here. On former nVidia based boards like my MSI K9A Platinum SLI (with an AMD X2 CPU), 800 MHz modules are detected as 800 on auto, no need to manually tweak anything in BIOS. I still have to see an nVidia EPP profile enabled board which is claimed to auto detect 1066 MHz capable memory sticks by default.
    On my system it is also the same... I have to up the RAM voltage to 2.2V (otherwise system is not stable), as well as setting up the timings and of course the RAM/FSB speed ratio to 1:2.66.
    I am running currently 4 chips of OCZ platinum 2 GHZ (for a total of 8 GB RAM, for 64 bit Vista and Linux). Also with mine (as we know Phenom II does not support 4 sticks of 1066 MHz) it drops to 800 MHz. As well as, I needed to bump the voltage to 2.2 V... otherwise in the middle of operation, system reboots. We know what this is about, dont we ?

  • MSI k9a Platinum + PowerColor 1950 pro extreme + bios v1.6

    Hello!  At motherboard stood version firmware v1.4 Run test 3DMark2005 and received 10,444 importance to my configuration (which is a good figure). Then Live Update pointed out that there are newer BIOS v1.6, I flash. Then began receiving in 7048 3DMark2005  :( Tried to reinvent the windows XP, set new driver, not helped, Clear CMOS. ReFlash to version v1.3 (why not found on the website version v1.4), and miracle! 3DMark2005 shows 10456  . It can be concluded to reduce speed blame new BIOS. So do not recommend placing Edition v1.4 above.
     Sorry for my English. I used a translator from GOOGLE 
    AMD 5200+ windsor
    MSI k9a platinum
    PowerColor X1950 PRO Extreme 256MB
    DDR-2 1Gb 800 Elixir *2
    Western Digital Serial ATA II (WD3200AAJS) - 8Mb, 7200rpm
    Chieftec LBX-02BBSL 450W

    Here we go AGAIN, I will explain this AGAIN ....... 
    Do not flash the bios if there aren't any problems!
    Flashing the bios is only usefull if you experience compatibility problems between certain hardware devices in your pc. So, leave the bios alone!
    A BIOS IS NOT A DRIVER!
    And, like it is with drivers, newer is not always better! Some driver/bios are meant only for newer hardwaremodels.
    LEAVE IT ALONE, UNLESS YOU ABSOLUTELY NEED TO MESS WITH IT.
    So, Foxyrus, lesser points in 3DMark was completely your own fault, not MSI's. Telling people not to use the 1.6 bios is nonsense. In your case it did not work, but for some folks it probably will work.

  • K9A Platinum and 4GB DDR2-800

    I'm a major MSI fan and have been for a long time. My computers (even my customer's) are MSI boards.
    Recently, I upgraded my motherboard, ram and processor to the new AM2 core (ok, not really new, but w/e). I have the following items:
    MSI K9A Platinum
    4GB DDR2 800 (2x2GB) G.Skill 5-5-5-15
    Athlon X2 5200+ Windsor 65w w/2x1MB cache
    2x ATI Radeon x1650 256 DDR2 (Crossfire'd)
    1x 200GB SATA2
    1x 300GB SATA2
    2x 500GB SATA2
    My previous system had:
    MSI K8N Neo-4F
    4x 1GB Kingston DDR 400
    Athlon X2 4800+
    Ok. So heres my problem:
    I installed each 2GB stick into slot 1 to verify they work and I got all 2GB. Shut down and installed each 2GB at each channel (DIMM1 and DIMM3) and BIOS reports 2544MB total. I look in BIOS and it says Physical Memory = 4096MB, Usable Memory = 2544MB. (This is before I even installed windows.) So, I tried to see if windows would report differently and after installing, it reported the same 2.48GB of ram. Now I know that Windows 32-bit can only go up to 3.2GB and I have no problem with that. My previous setup reported all 4GB of ram... so whats different about this board that it doesn't use all the memory available?
    If this is an issue with the Processor, then let me know. I paid for 4GB, not 2.5GB. I expected at most 3.2GB.
    And no. I won't go Vista. And Windows x64 has little to no support for a lot of what I do/have. So I won't use it either.
    Thanks for your help in advance.

    @ BOSSKILLER:
    I've done the single and dual vga test. I even placed the ram in single channel mode and it did the same.
    @ Bas:
    Its default. I'll paste it here.
    Code: [Select]
    [boot loader]
    timeout=30
    default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINDOWS
    [operating systems]
    multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINDOWS="Microsoft Windows XP Professional" /noexecute=optin /fastdetect /usepmtimer
    Thanks for your responses so far.
    Just for record, here is the RAM information taken from PC Wizard 2007 (From the makers of CPU-Z):
    FYI: In the ram size, 2 ranks, 8 banks means its a double sided chip. 2 sides (1 rank per side), 8 chips (1 bank per chip) per side.
    Code: [Select]
    Information SPD EEPROM (DIMM0) :
    Manufacturer : G Skill
    Part Number : F2-6400CL5-2GBPQ
    Serial Number : Unspecified
    Type : DDR2-SDRAM PC2-6400 (399 MHz)
    Format : Regular UDIMM (133.35 x 3)
    Size : 2048 MB (2 ranks, 8 banks)
    Module Buffered : No
    Module Registered : No
    Module EPP : No
    Width : 64-bit
    Error Correction Capability : No
    Max. Burst Length : 0
    Refresh : Reduced (.5x)7.8 µs, Self Refresh
    Voltage : SSTL 1.8v
    Prefetch Buffer : 4-bit
    Manufacture : Week 0 of 2000
    Supported Frequencies : 266 MHz, 400 MHz
    CAS Latency (tCL) : 4 clocks @266 MHz, 5 clocks @400 MHz
    RAS to CAS (tRCD) : 4 clocks @266 MHz, 5 clocks @400 MHz
    RAS Precharge (tRP) : 4 clocks @266 MHz, 5 clocks @400 MHz
    Cycle Time (tRAS) : 10 clocks @266 MHz, 15 clocks @400 MHz
    Min TRC : 16 clocks @266 MHz, 23 clocks @400 MHz

  • MSI P45 Platinum and Scythe Ninja 2

    Hi all,
    I'm a rookie here and sorry if this question has already been asked but search didn't give solution. I'm planning to buy an MSI P45 Platinum and found Circu-Pipe 2 interesting. They said it leaves enough space for "giant CPU heatsinks". Scythe's Ninja 2 seems to be a giant one... Cause I will purchase them via net, I cannot try them manually in a shop. Does anyone (or friend...) have the same or similar Circu-Pipe-d mainboard with a Ninja 2? Will them work together?
    Thanks in advance!
    Cheers!

    Managed to find the following link after doing a search, hope it answer ur queries
    http://www.scythe-eu.com/forum/mainboard-compatibility/498-msi-p45-platinum-compatability.html

  • MSI 965 Platinum and E6700 Core2. HELP

    My problem is this. I just got a MSI 965 platinum and a E6700 CPU.
    But when i check the little apps called CPU-Z then i can se my multiplier is only at 6x instead og 10x as default and core speed around 1600Ghz. I think its called (EIST) ?? or something.
    I did turn of the 3 thing in BIOS setup. Spread Spectrum, Speedsteep and the vanderpool. I tought that would keep my CPU running at full speed all time. But it dosent. Its still in auto mode (EIST) i can see in CPUZ
    I need some help here please. I dont want to use that processor cycling auto mode, i want it at 2.66Ghz all time.
    Is that posible with this combination ?  Can anybody help her please.
    thx
    Mugge

    Quote from: Quadrifoglio Verde on 27-February-07, 00:48:31
    Some topics you should read/scroll through first, as they contain useful info on what issues this board has using the current BIOS:
    click
    click
    click
    click
    click
    Overclocking on this board right now is just highly irregular, you can't tell what you are going to get. We will have to wait for a new BIOS release...
    Like the rest of us, your choice in motherboards has been unlucky. Hopefully a new BIOS release will help overclocking.
    What seems to be your maximum FSB right now?

  • I have an MSI K9A Platinum board

    I am showing very low scores on 3dmark with my new 8800gts, I have been told its some settings in my bios, I need some advice to get the potential from this card,,, not lookig to oc. here are links to my cpu-z info...
    http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=fdwzvc&s=3
    http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=141tfma&s=3
    Ive been told I need to change the ht link to 1000mhz or 1gz.. any help from someone who knows this board well?
    OS: Win XP Pro SP2 64 Bit
    Board: MSI K9A Platinum Crossfire ATI 3200 Chipset Bios ver 1.8
    RAM: 4GIG Patriot Extreme DDR2 800MHz
    CPU: AMD Athlon 6400+ 64x2 3.2 GHz
    Hard drives: (2) WD Caviar 250 GB
    Graphics cards: (1) XFX 8800GTS (G92) 512mb
    PSU: Antec TruePower Quattro 850 watt
    Burners: (2) Sony/Nec 7170A
    Chassis  Gigabyte 3D Aurora Tower
    Sound Card: Creative labs X-Fi SoundBlaster Xtreme Gamer

    Quote from: BOSSKILLER on 31-May-08, 22:07:32
    Go to BIOS, "Cell Menu", locate "HT Link Speed" and change it from "Auto" to "1GHz"
    hey BOSSKILLER  been awhile, does everything else look in order? ( from the screen shot links I posted)

  • K9A Platinum and Sata Harddrive

    Hi,
    I recently upgraded from a K8n to a K9A Platinum and unfortunately my SATA drives no longer show up in the "safely remove hardware" icon in the taskbar.
    I thought this might be a Windows problem with old boarddrivers and all, so i did a clean reinstall. Still not there. (In the disk policies tab under the drives property the  "write caching and safe removal" is grayed out and set to "optimise for performance", the only thing can select is "enable write caching on the disk". I have no idea if this makes any difference, I just thought I'd mention it!)
    Does anyone know how I could get the Sata drives to show up in the taskbar again??
    I mostly found people wanting to get rid of the Sata drives in the taskbar, so call me weird! I want them back!!! 
    Thanks for your help!

    Quote from: Ybeen on 29-August-07, 23:06:55
    Yea, that's what i gather from all the post on the internet, I'm just not happy with what i have! 
    Is there anyone out there who can tell me why my "write caching and safe removal" policies under the harddrive properties is grayed out??
    Thanks!!
    "Yea, that's what i gather from all the post on the internet, I'm just not happy with what i have!  "
    "Is there anyone out there who can tell me why my "write caching and safe removal" policies under the harddrive properties is grayed out?? "
    because those options are valid for removable storages only.
    "Thanks!!"

  • K9a platinum and ocz memory cas 4-5-4-15

    Hi ,
    I need help and i need it fast
    I have k9a platinum and i want to buy this memory: 
    OCZ Platinum 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800, 4-5-4-15,
    Is it compatible with my mobo and do u have opinion about this ram?
    Thanx

    Well my OCZ RAM which is meant to run @ 800MHz 4-4-4-15 timings. Runs very fine @ 800MHz w/ 4-4-4-10. 4-4-4-10 works up until about 870MHz.
    OCZ seem to state their timings lower then the RAM sticks can actually cope for some reason.
    I'm pretty sure it'll work, but contact OCZ for a correct answer.
    Also like Bas said: Sig should be updated

  • MSI K9A Platinum, X580 and Xtreme Ga

    So, me just as basicly everyone else who has this problem (which seems to be extremely common) is very tired having such lacking effort from Creative fixing the problems that do excist with the card range to fully corporate with about any modern motherboard. I got the SB9000, Xtreme Gamer - once I installed it in my K9A Platinum motherboard it found itself as BC00, worked fine but gave extremely messed up playback in Battlefield 242 once the Orbital Strike was raping the ground just as some other distant audio playbacks became very crackling which just ruins the experience and especially my faith in Creative as a company. After I updated to latest BIOS, v..6.0, the card wanted to find itself as a E800 and sometimes the audio card didn't want to be detected at all in Battlefield, forcing me to use Software sound which is outragous. I didn't pay to play with motherboard audio, but you guys on Creative just don't give a **bleep**, do you?Drivers are worthless... come on, seriously, it's the most lazy attitude I've ever seen... One update on about a year? And something like three updates, top, on a entire product range? Take atleast fi've minutes and fix this problem, I read the sticky but it didn't tell me anything but "We're Creative, go away from our forum spam down your Motherboard manufactors and hope for the best... losers" and I won't accept it. Either Creative gives us the exact fixes or nobody cares - Creative have the resources to fix this problem right now, it can't be so freaking hard to update the software when it's so easy making products that just won't work with any equipment from the 2th centuary in corporation with that audio chipset... Shame on you Creative. I sent a message to the Support about this half a week ago, still nothing, thanks alot for beeing bad at everything.

    BorkaBonum,
    Tone down the bad language.
    If the card isn't always being detected properly then that could be causing an issue. Have you tried uninstalling it, and then reinstalling it in another PCI slot? That'll force the card onto other resources (like another IRQ).
    Did you send a message to support through the website? Did you get an auto response? A response always automatically goes out when a request arri'ves so you know we got your e-mail, if you didn't get that, check your spam filter first in case it got stuck there.
    Cat

  • K9A Platinum 64x Edition drivers?

    I have the K9A Platinum with windows professional 64x.My problem is that I can not install the 64x realtek gigabit ethernet drivers. And I can't use the CD to install the drivers.

    http://www.msi.com.tw/program/support/driver/dvr/spt_dvr_detail.php?UID=737&kind=1
    The drivers page for your MB is a great resource to get the most current drivers. You may want to see if that driver works any better from the link above.

  • MSI K9a platinum

    Hi, i'm italian and i'm the owner of the mainboard in the subject.
    If i set the bios option "Onchip sata type" in the controllere SATA  section as " Native ide" then
    a bang appears in the windows "system" section for the "secondary ide channel"!!!!
    If i set the "legacy ide" option instead of "native ide" the bang disappear but it seems the  speed system decrease....
    I'd like to know what is the correct option for my sistem and if it is "native ide" how to correct the bang.
    CASE Thermaltake Mozart, Ram Crucial 1gb, DVD-Burner Optiarc, Graphic card Nvidia 7300 Gs Fanless, Am2 x2 4200, HD seagate barracuda 250 Gb
    Thanks in advance
    Fabrizio C.

    Quote from: XanaduServers on 17-November-06, 22:42:03
    What Bios version are you running?
    I Have flashed with the file 7280v12.zip 28/09/2006 found in the bios section of the mainboard.
    I have flashed from a bootable-cd with ramdrive  yesterday night (Italian time)
    I really don't know what else i can do...
    I have downloaded all the drivers from the Msi homepage section K9a and i have tried to install in different ways several times to solve the problems.
    I have solved a "floppy disk" bang (i have no floppy in my system...and it was disabled in the bios...) but i haven't been able to solve the Ide Channel bang.
    P.S.
    Amd away driver option "El" installed several tmes...to be sure....
    I really hope you can help me!
    It is the second Msi mainboard in a week i change...the other one was the K9n platinum and i had really a lot of compatibility problems...
    Fabrizio C.

  • MSI P45 Platinum and RAID 0!

    System specs below! First of all this system is basically a gaming rig. I am running Vista 64 on one single Western digital hard drive, and using an identical drive for storage. I was thinking about setting up a RAID 0 array with these two drives. Can this be easily done with this mobo? I am just wondering if there are any quirks associated with the MSI P45 Platinum mobo that would make this a pain to set up. Anyone else running a RAID 0 with this mobo and having good results? Would it even be worth it?
    I was told my several different people in the gaming community, that RAID 0 really speeds up map loading, which would be great. I would be backing up the array to another internal drive using True Image.
    Any advice would be great!! 

    Quote from: Jack t.N. on 20-May-09, 03:16:19
    Only, if you set the controller to AHCI Mode (which would not really be a problem either).  You probably won't need any additional drivers when the controller is working in IDE Mode.
    If you have to install drivers, use the latest ones from the JMicron FTP Download Server:
    ftp://driver.jmicron.com.tw/jmb36x/Win2k_xp_Vista/
    Ok, well I won't have my new storage drive until Thursday. I will run HD tune on the drive connected to both different controllers and see what is the fastest.
    I know we talked about this just a little. Still wondering about the RAID drives, or any drives attached to the ICH10R's SATA connections when it is set to RAID in the bios. The drives, including my SATA CD/RW drive does not show under "Standard CMOS features". Just #7 and #8 of the JMicron's show since they are still set to IDE in the bios.
    You commented with:
    "They are now Controlled by the ICH10R Firmware.  Look here":
    --> Integrated Peripherals --> On-Chip ATA Devices --> AHCI Devices Group
    --> Integrated Peripherals --> On-Chip ATA Devices -->
    Those locations are just where you set the RAID mode. There's no actual drives listed there. I do see a screen popup when booting my system with the two RAID drives saying "ok" and bootable. Plus I see them in the Matrix storage console. Is this normal then?  There really is no place when you search through the bios that you can see them listed??  I can hit the Ctrl and I keys and go into the actual RAID bios, but I don't see my RAID drives listed in the actual bios.
    Am I explaining this right??  Just wanting to make sure everything is working right.  It sure seems to work well with bench marks. Here's a shot of my array with HD tune.  I'm thinking that burst rate can't be right.

Maybe you are looking for

  • I'm trying to restore my Ipod touch from a backup however I don't remember the password, how do I find out what the password is?

    My ipod was sent into reset mode when it was pluged into my bf's computer. I pluged it into my computer where itunes is and itunes said I had to reset it, so I did and now I'm trying to restore it from a back up in itunes. Which I didn't know exsiste

  • Third-Party Plug-In Installs

    Can you someone post the easiest, most straightforward way to install third-party plug-ins for Shake that require you to manually install them? It seems to me that each plug-in is broken into different sections like icon, interface, macro, etc... BTW

  • Cannot change SQL command text in Data Flow Task

    I have an SSIS package that extracts data from Teradata into a SQL Server DB. I'm using SQL Server 2008 R2 EE x64, and Visual Studio 2008 PE (BIDS) supplied with it, accessing Teradata v13. In the Integration Services project, I have a Data Flow Task

  • Hosting iWeb entry pages on .Mac & video files on own server

    Hi I am trying to establish whether there is any real point in hosting a podcast on .Mac because of the bandwidth cost. Is there a point in publishing the podcast entry pages to .Mac, but hosting the video files on another server where I can get chea

  • Very slow downloading speeds on uTorrent

    I just bought the new MacBook Pro Retina 15-inch late 2013 model, and I can't seem to get anything past 5kb/s. What's weird is my older Mac has the same preferences in uTorrent and it actually downloads fast, while this one seems stuck and I can't th