MSI's Unlock CPU Core Technology

Core unlocking of AMD processor has been a very hot topic of forum discussion. The possibility of spending a mere $100 dollars for a Phenom II X2/X3 CPU and unlocking the disabled cores to yield a $200 dollars Phenom II X4 is exactly like the goal of every overclocker around .Due to this demand, MSI official introduce the exclusive technology of Unlock CPU Core.
MSI’s Unlock CPU Core technology became available with the introduction of AMD Phenom II CPU series. No matter dual-core, triple-core or quad-core, all fall into the same series, and the only difference in number of cores is the difference in normal operation. However, MSI has since offered a BIOS capable of taking advantage of the Unlock CPU Core ability in order to offer its customers an even better user experience. Simply by enabling the related function, users can easily activate concealed core(s). Additionally, in order to prevent any instability from activating the concealed core, MSI’s Unlock CPU Core technology can be turned both off and on, so the user can decide whether to overclock a single-core or run a multi-core setup.
[The Benefit of Unlock CPU Core]
• With the same price, one can get an even better performance
• The cost-performance ratio instantly increases 70% at least.
• Just turn on this function, unlock CPU Core for freely
[How to Use MSI's Unlock CPU Core Technology]
STEP 1: Enter the Cell Menu option list in the BIOS
STEP 2: Enable the Unlock CPU Core function
STEP 3: Enable the ACC (Advanced Clock Calibration) function, and, at this time, you will see the originally two core list will become a four core list with the options of enabling/disabling any of Core 2
At this time, though Core 1 cannot be disabled, all other cores have the options of being enabled/disabled, but should any of the cores be unstable, the user may be unable to start his/her O/S, and the system may even crash.
STEP 5: If the cores are unlocked successfully, the user may try entering the system information and discover that what was first a dual-core CPU has grown to a quad-core , and the performance has highly increased.
[Applied Model]

Quote from: Bas on 12-November-09, 01:04:39
Could be the option is missing because your CPU hasn't got a 4th core?
I don't know, just guessing.
Im not sure either, but there are reports outthere that say that AMD is lasercutting the extra cores on the X2/X3 range, because of the unlocking of them.
So they physically remove any connections to other cores or the core itself and thus you cant unlock it, cause they rendered it useless and/or its not there anymore.
This has to do with the fact that most of the cores that are disabled are flawed.
Dunno if thats the case with your for sure though, you might get lucky and get the extra core to run, but there is NO guarantee it will work flawlessly.

Similar Messages

  • 785GTM-e45 enable Unlock CPU Core - won't post past sata harddrive detection

    I recently bought a 785GTM-E45 and have a Phenom II x2 560 in it.  I have a sata harddrive drive attached with the Raid setting to AHCI.  I have windows 7 x64 running fine, but wanted to see if I could unlock any cores.  If I enable ACC but leave Unlock CPU Core to Disabled, I can boot fine.  But when I change Unlock CPU Core to Enabled and reboot, i get the Post messages and it identifies the CPU as Phenom II X4 B60.  Its goes through the whole posting until it get to initializing the sata drives.  It will sit on that screen for a few minutes and then say that no drives are found so it cant boot.  If i do the same thing with the harddrive unplugged, it immediately says it can't find any drives.  I have tried changing the Raid setting to IDE with similar results.   I am running bios version 8.8  One thing I noticed that I thought was strange is that when I do the save after enabling CPU Unlock, the computer totally shuts off.  The power light turns off, all drives and fans turn off, then it turns it self back on and does the reboot.  It only does this with CPU Unlock enabled.
    785GTM-E45
    Phenom II x2 560BE
    OCZ SLI-Ready 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 800 (PC2 6400)
    Onboard video and sound
    Hauppauge 2250 QAM Tuner
    Hauppauge 1600 QAM Tuner
    Samsung F4 HD204UI 2TB
    Antec NeoHE 500W
    Win 7 x64

     I believe that AMD is doing a more thorough job of disabling defective cores on those things and you will not be able to unlock. We've been seeing more and more of that recently on the 5xx series. If you want more cores then you will have to pay for them, looks like no longer a free ride for extra cores. Can't blame MSI for that.

  • Msi gaming 7 cpu core voltage diffrences

    Hello guys I'm trying to OC my 4770k.For the beginning I made cpu ratio 4.2 with 1.255 core voltage.The thing is my aida64 cpuID and cpu-z shows 1.272 which is quite high from what I have set.Not even lower(vdrops etc.) so which one I should take care.System seems to run stable.Tested it with aida system stablity check for 20-25 min.Temp were 82(my room is hot)I use coolermaster hyper 212 evo.
    Also is there also tweaks should I consider for OC'ing?

    CPU V. can reach up to 1.400v's before it becomes a genuine concern. You will most likely exceed the recommended maximum CPU temperature way before reaching that voltage. It makes no sense to fix and run full throttle all the time at idle and low use for an everyday type machine. Leave the RAM at default (XMP disabled) until the CPU OC is confirmed stable, then work on the RAM speed settings.
    Need a screen shot of the sub section 'CPU Features'.
    Actually, leave everything on auto/default/stock, use M-Flash, BIOS + ME option and update to the V1.4 BIOS. After the flash re-install the newest ME driver from an MSI Website of your choice, Global, Europe, or USA. Will repeat, I bought a Radio Shack el-cheapo DMM for under 20 bucks and it works great and extremely accurate. DMM is the only way to verify if the readings you see are correct.
    Nice thing about Z97 (and Z87) is you can set the CPU Ratio out of auto and not lose the power saving features. EIST and C1E can be enabled to throttle down for idle and low use. Another OC method is the Turbo Method with Turbo and Enhanced Turbo enabled leaving the CPU Ratio on auto and simply setting the 4 Core Ratios in CPU Features.

  • 970A-G46 Question: Unlocking 960T cores

    Hi,
    I have just bought this board for a Phenom x4 960T BE and was looking to see if one or two extra cores would unlock. I know they are not guaranteed to unlock, but only 4 cores are showing in the Bios and I just don't know if I'm missing something obvious or if this cpu only has the four cores. Can anyone help?
    Screenshot:
    http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i262/markelynn/MsStup00.jpg

    The latest BETA UEFI/BIOS Release might be worth looking at in this context:
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=154535.msg1151025#msg1151025
    Quote
    E7693AMS.140 ---> E7693AMS.154
    - Change warning message follow spec 0.09 after OC fail.
    - Set MOS tempreature OVT limit as 6Dh for pcb 2.0.
    - Fixed administator password can't work issue.
    - Fixed the admin password ignore case issue.
    - Fix unlock CPU core function fail.

  • MSI 870A-G54 (FX) CPU Core control unlock setting error

    Hello,
    My motherboard MSI 870A-G54 (FX) has strange issue: CPU Core unlock option is not working properly. I've switched in BIOS  Cell Menu the setting "CPU Core Control" - Enabled, and after the restart, there is error message about RAM chek - till 3325 MB instead 16 GB, and after that windows7 Ultimate x64 tries to load, but unfortunately displays the Blue Screen of Death. After disabling CPU Core Control option windows start normaly. Also after using MSI LiveUpdate5 and installing BIOS Code unlock Technology 1.0.106, I got the following message: Error Message
    PC Hardware details:
    CPU - TripleCore AMD Phenom II X3 Black Edition 720, 2800 MHz (14 x 200), Codename:Heka, Core Stepping: RB-C2
    16GB (4x4GB) Kingston KVR1333D3N9/4G
    VGA Sapphire Radeon HD 4830, Codename: RV770
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64, SP1
    BIOS   V17.18
    I'll be glad to have some of your ideas how to handle it...

    I also have an X3 720BE. Mine will not unlock, some do not... it's not a built in feature on 'All' CPU's.
    That said.. I have owned mine since the beginning of AM3. It has been a great CPU with 3 cores. I have had OC settings at or above 3.4GHz stable.
    If you search you can find a lot of OC information. This was an early release AM3, and a lot of owners, forums, test websites etc.. have information available. I still use it in my HTPC.
    Owners who have been able to 'unlock' thier CPU's do get extra core(s).. but it's not as stable. I would rather have a stable, able to OC CPU than an unlocked one that can't obtain the OC stable numbers. It's a mind game.
    Good Luck

  • 785GT-E63 and cpu core control

    In BIOS 7551vS4 MSI removed cpu core control, ie, I can't disable the broken kernel, if what some Athlon II X3 is not critical, I can use old BIOS, but for the Phenom 960T is a problem. This CPU supported just starting S4 bios
    How I can use 5 cores? I want to return this option or add processor microcode in the old BIOS.

    All cores are enabled by default (Auto). The other settings are meant to limit the enabled cores.

  • Disable Turbo Core Technology?

      Hello.  I have an A78M-45e board with an A8-7600 APU.  It is my understanding that this processor has Turbo Core Technology with 3.1 base frequency and turbo up to 3.8.  What is confusing to me are these instructions in the manual under OC bios settings:
    "For CPU which supports the Turbo Core Tech., please set AMD Turbo Core Technology and AMD Cool’n’Quiet as Disabled to retain the default CPU core speed"
    I can understand disabling Cool n' Quiet but why disable Turbo Core Technology?
    Thanks
    Pete

    So you want your CPU all cores run as usual?
    Base on AMD Turbo Core Technology, part of CPU core ratio may pop down for
    providing more performance headroom for active CPU core, even AMD Cool’n’Quiet
    Technology is Disabled.
    I think if you enable Turbo Core Tech, only few CPU core will turbo up to 3.8, but others ratio will drop down. It depends what you need.

  • Does SL really utilize both CPU cores?

    I've been wondering about the 32/64 bit and multi-core technologies. So we've had the availability of 64bit technology for over two years, yet the new O/S only now exploits 64bit technology. I ran multiple tasks; video, internet speed tests, etc. and monitored via Activity Monitor. It didn't seem to me SL uses both cores independently. Does anyone know if SL uses both CPU cores for multiple independent tasks or processes?

    To All,
    I would like to add an addendum to Edmund's latest post, as quoted below. This will, perhaps, illuminate what will occur now, and the possibilities for the near future...
    2) as pointed out by someone else if app used Grand Central services. Can't imagine many do yet.
    Again keep in mind MULTIPLE apps, even if single threaded, will be assigned to balance out core/CPU loads. And the kernel/OS itself will use the multiple cores for various services used by the applications.
    This is all true, and I would like to highlight that no third-party applications yet take advantage of GCD (none of which I am aware).
    However, we can almost certainly assume that many of the underlying components of SL, and probably all of those newly "Cocoa-ized" SL applications (including the Finder) will be taking advantage of Grand Central. The benefits will apply directly to all the "native" processes, and will carry over to third-party processes even if only by virtue of the native ones "getting out of the way."
    If you have 3 single-threaded processes actively consuming CPU cycles, and you have two cores, the ability to "packetize" and dynamically dispatch even one of them allows the other two to be handled more efficiently and smoothly.
    We haven't even started mentioning OpenCL. This is still waiting in the wings, for the most part, but what I have seen so far is... almost shocking. There are a few rudimentary "benchmark" apps floating about that do use OpenCL (all command line), and what they show is that my 8600M GT will complete in less than 2 seconds a "general computing" calculation that it takes my 2.5 GHz "Penryn" CPU 14 seconds to complete (using both cores!).
    So, the question becomes: "How much of Snow Leopard is taking advantage of OpenCL?" I think none of it. Not yet. Whether or not we begin to see the leveraging of OpenCL in updates to SL remains to be seen. Let's not step over the line with speculation, here
    Scott

  • MSI Z77A - G45 - CPU multiplier problem

    Hi,
    I recently bought this PC:
    Intel Core i5 3570 k
    MSI Z77A - G45 - with BIOS V 2.5
    Seasonic S12II-620 620W 
    Corsair Vengeance Low Profile White 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 1600
    Amd HD 7850
    My problem is following:
    If I change CPU Ratio (multiplier), in standart mode to 40x and leave CPU core voltage auto, it cause instability, even if use Cpu core voltage 1.25 V for ratio 40x.
    But that's not all problem. I could understand, why I cant OC my CPU, but this instability is even if I change multiplier to 30x from default 34x and this makes me uncertain.
    Now I will describe you that instability...
    OK so, when I change ratio to 40x or 30x it doesn't matter, it runs to windows successfully but after using windows something about 3-6 hours pc turns off.
    I also  discovered second problem by coincidence. If I hit F11 (Boot menu) , when I am starting pc and I have set ratio 40x or 30x, I can choose what I want to boot only for 10 secs and after that PC restarts by itself....
    But if I set default 34x ratio I can choose what I want to boot forever and pc doesnt restart.
    I know that boot menu is not some test of stability but it is very strange... Why If I change multiplier, it doesnt matter, if it is higher or lower then default settings it just cause instability ? :-/
    Thanks for help.

    Quote from: xmad on 19-August-12, 07:02:15
    I was just saying that the beta caused a vga problem, latest release the f11 problem so try the release prior to that, but if you got it working don't touch it! lol
    Are you still using the beta bios?
    No clue, we are just users like you are, just keep checking the website. You should report the troubles you had with 2.4 to msi too.>>How to contact MSI.<<
    Yeah iťs working now. As I said, I wanted flash older Bios 2.4, so for sure I click on restore defualts in bios (for sure before flashing) in that 2.64 Bios version...
    PC restarts and my graphic card started working =)...
    So now I am running on that the latest Bios as you refered mi (2.64 beta).
    I am running some test of stability on @ 4 GHz with 1.070 V (IBT,Prime,memmaxx,linx,cinebench,occt,super pi, 3d mark) temps are 62 C max...
    So I guess it's ok now =)
    At the end I have one question :
     My Cpu is now running on 40 x ratio all the time, there is no some underoverlocking ratio (16x etc.) when it's in idle. I was thinking the Ivy Bridge overclocking is overclocking of turbo only...
    I know It's detail, because I have good temps even in idle with 40x ration (33-39 C) but i want to be assured if it is ok.
    EDIT:
    And btw I didnť have 2.4 bios flash on, I wanted put them on... But before flashing my 2.64 beta started working right with HD 7850 as is wrote upper.
    I had Bios 2.5 before 2.64

  • MSI NF980-G65 CPU heatsink selection

    Hey guys, I'm ordering my new cpu tomorrow, Phenom II x4 965 BE, the new 125w revision. My motherboard is the MSI NF980-G65.
    I need to figure out which of the top end heatsinks will fit without interfering with my ram.
    G.Skill Trident.
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231282&cm_re=gskill_trident-_-20-231-282-_-Product
    Dual channel mode with 2 sticks utilizes the first two slots I think.
    The ram measures 2 1/8" tall to the top of the heat spreader.
    So far the cooler i'm most interested in is the Scythe Mugen 2 but the thing looks huge, from what I can tell folk with AMD boards have had success by mounting the fan so it's raised a bit, thus clearing the ram. I dont know if this would affect the cooling being that the fan's offset ?
    I dont know how high the base of the fan sits by default, judging from the pictures it's not very high, so i'm guessing i'd have to offset it by at least 1".
    I'd like to orient it to blow out through the back of the case as opposed to vertically into the psu.
    The other option would be the Corsair H50, I have a modded side panel and I could mount the rad/fan to one of the 120mm holes. This option eliminates all the fitment issues, having said that i'm still not convinced the H50 is all it's cracked up to be, seems there are many mixed reviews.
    I am open to other suggestions if you guys have any. With the right cooler, a couple of gin and tonic's and a lot of luck i'll be able to hit 4ghz, at least that's my goal
    The case is a Cooler Master Praetorian with great air flow due to a couple of side, top and floor panel mods.
    This is a brand new build and i'm hoping to have it all ready to go by the weekend so i'd like to get set on the right cooler by tomorrow, i'd hate to have to return it and delay the building !

    I have the same board and am using a 945 95w version. I have the Thermalright 128-SE. It's a bit lower then others and just fits in my 4u rack case. I have a 120mm AC PWM fan on it which blows down. Right now i have min fan speed set down a notch or two and Hwmonitor is reporting fan at 75% and cpu cores at ~25c at idle. It keeps the cores at 40-45c under stress test. And yet even at full speed you can't hear the fan over drives and other sounds. A little bigger fan would easly hand a hotter cpu.  Just be sure to order the am2/3 brackets.
    Also the upper part of the heat sink is offset a bit to the side with the small pipes. hang that over the ram and it will help keep them cool, though my G.Skill 1600 ripjaws don't seem to need any help staying cool

  • K8NGM2-FID CPU core voltage Fluctuations and instabilities-- Bad caps!!?

    I Have K8NGM2-FID bought 6 months ago and started having stability issues since last month.
    Here is my configuration
    K8NGM2-FID ver 2.0 Bios 3.73 now, used to be 3.5, experimented both, but did not help
    Onboard video, Onboard Lan, firewire
    Memory : 512 x 2 Corsair DDR400 in dual channel mode at 2.65v 64MB to Video
    CPU: AMD64 X2 3800+
    HDD WD 160GB SATA150
    Winfast TV2000 Expert Tv Tuner
    Drivers, tried many version ( currently using latest Nvidia Video, MB drivers)
    Now, the description of the problem.
    System suddenly hangs with or without load, intermittenly. Nothing to do what we are working on. Even when System is idle.
    Hangs means, it could happend two ways,
    1. simply it would not respond, screen simply freezes,
    2. sometimes, you simply see horizantal lines on monitor( Typically happens when cpu core voltage drops below it can handle). I know this because
    I am using RMClock on my Turion laptop, and when we try to find lowest stable voltage we see this behaviour.
    Now, some other observation,  from the day one CPU core voltage has been fluctuating a lot. Used to fluctuate anywhere between 1.37v to 1.304v( at default 1.35v).  But still has been stable. Ran 24hour prime95, so no problems.
    Recently I am seeing voltage fluctuations is more, as low as 1.28v to 1.39v at default 1.35v, so I tried RMCLock and raised the voltage to 1.4v, but it seems that did not help much.
    Now, As per the MSI PCALert4  voltage is changing anywhere from 1.28v to 1.38v, but also I get core voltage field empty( that is right no CPU core voltage shown) and alarm sounds. It seems, CPU does not get voltage at all and gets very low voltage for a second or so.
    Things I tried,  Changed the powersupply, changed the Memory, but no use. I am lucky enough to have exact same configuration I built for a friend. So, I checked voltages on his PC and I do not see this behaviour.
    Now, I ran out of options.... any idea anyone had similar problem, and if they solved?
    Now, here are PCAlert 4 images
    http://img171.imageshack.us/my.php?image=128vatdef135sp5.jpg
    http://img256.imageshack.us/my.php?image=novoltageif5.jpg
    http://img406.imageshack.us/my.php?image=132vredbi3.jpg
    Also, another weird behaviour with Bios, even when I change setting in bios, they did not take effect, even loading default does not help, so I have to press CMOS reset button.
    Any help will be appreciated.
    Thanks

    Thanks for the quick reply.
    First to clarify, these things has been developed a monrh ago only. It has been fine for more than 5 months.
    1). Yes Memory is insalled in closest DIMM sockets to CPU,
     2). I think you mean mem voltage. The memory I have is Corsair Value series and it even runs fine DDR400 at 2.55v, but I bumped it to 2.65v and also tried 2.75v ( 2.65v is typical I have been using with this MB).
    3). Memory has been tested with Memtest for 24 hours and ran Dual Prime95 for 24 hours when system is assembled.
    Also swapped from another PC I built for my friend with same components( same corsair value series memory) Also tested my memory on his PC, no probs. BTW I also tested my memory at 333, freezing even happens even at that speed.
    4). PSU has nothing to do, because I have been monitoring all PSU rails with SPeedFan none of of the rail voltages moved at all. I even monitored with Digital Multimeter to ensure. Anyways I even tried 3 psus, one ANtec 350W smart power supply, ThemalTake 420W, Ultra 400 Watts. All have more than enough juice to power this setup. (onboard Graphics card).
    5). Yes, freezing happens in simply desktop too. Nothing to do with CPU load or graphics load. It could happen even when just idling.
    6). I use stock CPU cooler in Antec 1650B case with 120MM Fan running in the back( approx 50cfm) and CPU temp never exceeded 47c and MB temp typically around 28c and NB temp around 50-60c using a digital probe and 55-70c using Nvidia Monitor based on load vs no load.
    7). As per Dual core patches, I applied AMD Dual Core  optimizer quite a while ago. As per the MS Patch, No I have not applied( But I doubt it helps because it has been stable without that for all these months). I may try that.
     Now, what I am trying, I  disabled CNQ, and logging Core voltage fluctuation with speedfan( no monitoring).
    as of yesterday night the core voltage was varying from 1.28v to 1.39v( I think that is insane 110mv fluctuation in CPU core voltage!!?) at default CPU voltage of 1.35v. BTW it has nothing to with CPU load, all these logs generated when it was idle. I remember fluctuation even when MB was new, but lowest I observed was 1.304v.
    SOmehow, I suspect VRM is pretty bad on this MB. 
    Anyways, see the response and let me know if you think I am missing somethings. Appreciate your help.
     

  • Z77A-GD65 Gaming CPU Core Speed Lock 1.6Ghz

    Hello everyone,  this is my first time using a MSI board at first I'm using the default setting in BIOS and the core speed at idle is at 1.6GHz which is fine. However, when the CPU cores are at full load it still remains at 1.6GHz.
    I've done a bit of research tried different settings with EIST, Intel Turbo Boost, Enhanced Turbo, Adjust CPU Ratio, C1E, but it is not working.
    Just to clarify the power settings in Windows is set to balanced.
    Here's my rig's spec:
    Motherboard: Z77A-GD65 Gaming
    CPU: Intel 2600k
    RAM: Corsair vengeance 16GB kit
    VGA: AMD 290x
    Storage: Corsair Force GT 120GB
    OS: tried both Win7 and Win8 64bit
    Thanks in advance 
    P.S. I'm away from home at the moment if needed I can take some screen caps from the BIOS.

    For initial setup, establish everything works correctly at stock/auto/default on all the OC settings. Make sure EuP 2013 and Spread Spectrum are disabled. EIST and C1E enabled is fine, and just try with standard Turbo enabled and Enhanced Turbo disabled. Might try with C-State disabled. Download the utility Intel Burn Test (IBT) and see if the CPU speed ramps up to the Turbo speed.

  • Decreasing voltage for CPU core

    I have decreased CPU core voltage for my P4 2,8GHz from default 1,525V to 1,5V which helps me to decrease CPU full-load temp. from 61-62°C to 58-59°C. System is styl rocky stable. Is there something negative/dangerous on decreasing CPU core voltage?
    Thanx
    My system:
    Gigabyte GA-8IK110 i875P
    Intel P4 2.80 GHz (800MHz FSB), HT enabled
    2 x 512 MB TwinMOS PC3200 DDRAM 400 MHz CL2.5 dual channel
    MSI G4 Ti4600 VTD 128MB (MSI-8872) (detonatorXP 44.03)
    Creative SB Audigy 2 (latest drivers 05/2003)
    Creative Inspire 5.1 5300 speakers
    80 GB Seagate Baracuda IV 7200 rpm
    32x CDROM TEAC
    350W PSU Enermax EG365P-VE
    19" Philips Briliance
    WinXP SP1
    DirectX 9

    Ther's no harm in doing that.

  • Macbook Pro CPU Core's temperature measurments

    I have a late 2011 15-inch Macbook Pro OS X 10.8.4 with BootCamp installed.
    In OS X environment, the CPU core temperatures are around 40 - 44C, while in idle or with a minimum Safari browsing the net.
    When in Bootcamp with Windows 7 Professional, in the similar operating/application condition, but the my Macbook's CPU Core Temperatures are always about 52 - 55C (10 degrees higher than in OS X).
    While doing heavy stuffs such as Virus Scan, Time Machine, Data Backup, Video Editing etc ... on both environments the CPU core temperatures could go up to upper 80's degree C.
    Is it normal ? if so, is there any explanation for 10 degrees warmer while in BootCamp/Windows ?
    Thanks

    RealTemp, CoreTemp but my money goes to AIDA64 for the most thorough information about all your devices, drivers, versions of, as well as temp and fan speed.
    Latest drivers and utilities
    http://forums.tweaktown.com/gigabyte/30530-latest-overclocking-programs-system-i nfo-benchmarking-stability-tools.html
    GPU-Z:
    http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/SysInfo/GPU-Z/
    AIDA64 Extreme Edition
    http://www.aida64.com
    http://www.aida64.com/product/aida64-extreme-edition/overview
    CCleaner
    http://www.piriform.com/ccleaner
    BootChamp
    http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/28468/bootchamp
    Lubbo FanControl for MacBook Pro
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/lubbofancontrol/
    - check forum for tip on how to get it to work with new Retina MBP
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/lubbofancontrol/forums/forum/970570/topic/539412 2
    TEMP cleanup
    http://support.kaspersky.com/faq/?qid=208279128
    How to view error message: 
    From Control Panel-> Admin. Tools-> Event Viewer-> Windows logs:
    Check Application and System Folders for Red highlit messages. Note that you can right-click clear these log folders.
    Memtest
    This is a step by step guide with audio and video to explain how to use memtest to see if your memory is defect:
    Another thing to add is that some errors will not be found on the first pass, best to do at least 3 passes.
    http://www2.corsair.com/training/how_to_memtest/

  • Load balancing on CPU cores

    Hi,
    We have a supermicro server with 2 x E5-2660 processors and 160GB of memory.
    The only role assigned to this server is Hyper-V and we have about 100 VMs each with two vCores provisioned on this server.
    I checked the cpu load by monioring the %Processor Time counter and noticed that while 10 out of 32 cores are at 100%, 15 of them are below 10%.
    I am wondering if it possible to balance the load on the CPU cores to improve the performance and utilize the full processing power of each CPU.

    Hyper-V will schedule things appropriately - most likely better than any manual intervention could provide.  It could be the nature of your applications.
    Hyper-V does provide the ability to assign memory weightings to different VMs if you really want to get into that.
    .:|:.:|:. tim

Maybe you are looking for

  • TS2771 I'm trying to update my ipod touch and it gives me an unknown error. -1, i tried to reset.

    I'm trying to update my ipod touch and it gives me an unknown error. -1, i tried to reset. Someone told me there is a reset option on the status screen on itunes, couldn't find that.  so i just held to 2 buttons until apple showed up. 

  • In SXMB_MONI with(Green Flag) "Message Scheduled Outbound Side" (using BPM)

    Hi All, I had a Scenario where I am using BPM (to collect the Idocs received from Sender SAP R/3 system) and create a File as target structure. But one of the entry i found as (Green Flag) with status "Message Schedule Outbound Side". But the remaini

  • Classic starting up

    for some reason the other day my computer started opening 9.2 right after booting up on 10.4. I have the start up disk marked as 10.4. any idea how to get it to stop doing this? thanks, BF

  • Will the Intous 2 work with Elements9 on a Macbook please.?

    Hello everyone, New Guy says Hi. ! I have an opportunity to buy an old tablet with a stylus for $50 Canadian. Can I use it with the Macbook please. I succeeded in downloading Mac drivers from Wacom but there is no manual in .pdf form available on the

  • Permission of .pacnew files

    After updating sudo package smth made me check the diff between /etc/sudoers and /etc/sudoers.pacnew (I did it from regular user, not root) : $ LANG="" diff /etc/sudoers.pacnew /etc/sudoers diff: /etc/sudoers: Permission denied For my surprise he yel