MSI TI4800SE supported resolutions.

I have a MSI TI4800SE and my old monitor died recently, and I have been thinking about getting a widescreen monitor to replace the old one. All the ones I have seen have a warning stating to make sure your card can support the resolution(1440x900 or 1680x1050). I do not see either of those resolutions in the manual, but it does say the actual settings may be different because of different monitors. So you can see why I am a bit confused. So if I do decide to get a widescreen monitor am I going to also have to get a new graphics card to fully utilize the monitor?

piercedfreak,
Quote
Supports super high resolution graphics modes
640x480 8/16/32 bit colors with 150Hz
800x600 8/16/32 bit colors with 150Hz
1024x768 8/16/32 bit colors with 120Hz
1152x864 8/16/32 bit colors with 120Hz
1280x1024 8/16/32 bit colors with 100Hz
1600x1200 8/16/32 bit colors with 85Hz
1920x1200 8/16/32 bit colors with 75Hz
2048x1536 8/16/32 bit colors with 60Hz
Take Care,
Richard

Similar Messages

Which MSI card supports the apple 30"

There are so many video cards out there and theories about which card will run this monitor, i almost wasted a lot of money trying to run the monitor on my 6800GT... it doenst i have tried both DVI ports.
Basically i want to know which MSI card supports the apple 30" does the new 7800? the old 6800 ultra? is my 6800GT messed?
A few things i can confirm are this, the monitor because of some signal issues DOES NOT support SLI at all.
I have read a few reviews that say the 7800GTX does not support this monitor - very disappointing i have to look for an older 6800 card.... - this is unconfirmed maybe someone can get back to me about this.
Anyways if MSI could tell us which card of theirs works i will turf my 6800GT and buy whatever is needed.

I can't be shure which MSI card support it, but reading the release notes from the latest nvidia drivers (77.22) I saw this:
The GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MB works in single card mode with Apple 30 inch HD Cinema panel. However, an issue has been discovered when running the GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MB card in SLI mode with an Apple 30 inch HD Cinema display. This is due to an interaction
between the GPU, the application, and the ability to scale to nonnative panel resolutions of the Apple display.
All GeForce 6 series GPUs will work with Apple 23 and 20 inch HD Cinema displays in single GPU mode. NVIDIA recommends using the GeForce 6800 Ultra 512MB with the Apple 30 inch HD Cinema Display line only in non-SLI modes.
Edit here:
Modes Supported for High Resolution Displays:
Display:
*Apple 30” Cinema HD Display (Dual link DVI)
Hardware Requirements:
*All High-end Quadro FX (see list of products in “Quadro FX Family of High End GPUs”
* GeForce 6800 with 512 MB
Maximum Resolution:
2560x1600 @ 60Hz
Source: 77.22 Forceware Release Notes.
I guess that your card (6800 GT Non Ultra) doesn't support it. Maybe a new drievers release will fix this.

K7N2G + MSI Ti4800SE = no 8x AGP???

Hi all
I just bought a new MSI K7NG2 mobo and an MSI Ti4800SE-VTD8X (MS-8900) and can't get them to work in 8x AGP.
I have enabled 8x support in the bios (ver 2.1) but 3DMark2001SE still reports it running 4x, though it identifies support for 8x
In it's current state the graphics card is running a lot slower than it did in my K7N420Pro mobo. (a 3dmark score of 7000 compared to 10000 before)
I'm using an AthlonXP2400+ 266FSB and 512MB of PC2100 (266Mhz) 2 sticks in DDR slots 2 and 3
Does anyoone know how to make them run in 8x mode?
Thanks in advance

I've tried downloading the 2.03 version fron nVidia and it wont load.
It unpacks all the files then just quits as soon as it starts loading the intall wizard (all it does is show the nVidia logo and then close)
I unloaded the drivers which came with the CD I had on and tried again and now can't load them either, so not sure which version they were
help!

X fails to detect monitor supported resolutions

I have 3 monitors connected to a Radeon HD 7750, using the radeon driver:
Left: NEC MultiSync 90GX², 1280x1024, connected via DisplayPort-to-VGA adaptor
Middle: Samsung SyncMaster BX2335, 1920x1080, connected via DVI
Right: LG Flatron Wide, 1680x1050, connected via HDMI
On every reboot (warm or cold), X fails to detect the NEC monitor's supported resolutions. xrandr will only set it to 1024x768 or less, and it shows "no signal". However if I disconnect the VGA cable, plug it into another monitor (which is broken, but still powers on), and run xrandr again, it lists up to 1280x1024. If I then set the correct modes and layouts, then return the VGA cable to the NEC monitor, it works just fine. Turning the display off via xset doesn't cause any issue either. So on every reboot I have to move the cable to a spare monitor, set up xrandr, then move the cable back.
How can I save this working configuration and force X to apply it on boot even though the monitor for some reason claims to not support it?
I didn't have this issue with Ubuntu, but my setup was a bit different there, so possibly it just didn't manifest.
Here is the Xorg.0.log and journalctl -k from the most recent boot. The get-edid output is also interesting (and contains some control characters which pastebin removed).

The NEC on DVI would be only temporarily to get it's real edid-data .
Once you got that in a file, you can use a special kernel parameter at boot to force use of the real edid-data for the NEC monitor.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ke … s_and_EDID describes how it could be done.
Note that configuring this is tricky.

Maximum Supported resolution on graphics card???

Does anyone know the maximum supported resolution on the MacBook graphics card? I'd like to see if i could get a cheaper and bigger display than the ones made by apple. Any info would be appreciated.

No, that's just for the internal display.
Here's the info from Apple's hardware documentation
Extended Desktop Mode- In extended desktop mode, the resolution of the two displays can be set independently. In this mode, the maximum external display resolution supported by the MacBook is 2048 x 1536 at 60 Hz for analog displays and 1920 x 1200 at 60 Hz for digital displays.
1920x1200 is the native resolution for the 23" Apple display, the 24" Dell display, and probably some others. They work great with Macbooks.

Supported Resolutions for Powerbook 12" Rev A

I have a Rev A 12" Powerbook (867MHz) that has the Geforce 4MX 32MB graphics card. I was wondering if anyone knew the resolutions that my Powerbook supports and in particular if it would support a 1680x1050 resolution since I want to buy the Dell 2005FPW which runs at a native 1680x1050 resolution and use it as an external monitor.

Just for everyone's reference, in case this information is still needed....
The Rev.A 12" PowerBook supported resolutions and refresh rates for an external monitor, according to the technology specs PDF file available when it was first introduced:
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-top: 10px;"><tr valign="bottom"><td>Picture size in pixels</td><td>Maximum refresh rate</td><td>Pixel depth with
12-inch display inactive</td><td>Pixel depth with
12-inch display active</td></tr><tr><td>640 by 480</td><td>85Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>800 by 600</td><td>85Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>832 by 624</td><td>75Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>1024 by 768</td><td>85Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>1152 by 870</td><td>85Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>1280 by 960</td><td>85Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>1280 by 1024</td><td>85Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr><tr><td>1600 by 1200</td><td>75Hz</td><td>24 bpp</td><td>24 bpp</td></tr></table>

MSI TI4800SE-VTD8X & Asus P4S8X-X - Does it work?

This subject is nothing new, but has anyone made this combination work with the capture drivers? My computer will capture the first time after I install the drivers, but the next time I reboot, the computer either hangs on startup, or the driver just doesn't work (depending on the capture driver I use).
If someone has made this work, I would appreciate knowing what version of drivers they used, including the motherboard bios and AGP port driver version numbers.
Aside from this problem and some movies being too dark, the card seems to work ok.
One other question, has anyone had any luck with MSI Tech support? I tried to fill out their customer support page, and when I tried to submit it, received the dreaded "Page can not be displayed" and lost everything I had just typed. I also just called them, talked to someone within 5 minutes, was put on hold for about 15 minutes, and then hung up on. I tried calling back, but was forced to leave a message.
Thanks in advance for any help.

I am using Windows XP Pro. It was a fresh install starting with an empty hard drive.
As for the video drivers I have been using the Nvidia drivers. I started with 43.45, but upgraded to 44.03. Same results with either one.
I had tried the MSI drivers but they didn't work either. After each try, I restored my drive to the "clean install state" using Norton Ghost. I didn't want any old driver remnants to be a problem.

MSI Ti4800SE and MSI KT4V motherboard incompatible?

Yesterday I bought an MSI Ti4800SE to replace a GeForce2. It booted up fine and Windows detected it and installed the drivers. However, on rebooting, the monitor went blank and there was a series of beeps.
The computer would not start. I tried taking out all the other cards and tried the video card in 2 other computers but all I got was the beeps. I took the card back and got a refund as they had no more in stock.
Is the video card incompatible with the motherboard for some reason? Did I somehow cause the card to die? Should I buy another or will the same thing happen again?
Any help would be much appreciated.
My system is
MSI KT4V motherboard
Athlon 2500
512Mb Kingston RAM
SB Live
Network card
56k Modem
2 hard drives
DVD ROM
Mitsumi CD writer
350W PSU
Windows 98SE
Thanks in advance

Thanks very much for your advice - looks like I need to spend yet more money then!
But do you think I damaged the card by not supplying enough current, bearing in mind that it booted OK the first time? Or was it not damaged at all?

[Motherboard] MSI Motherboard supported NVMe device. 3X Faster

[Motherboard] MSI Motherboard supported NVMe device. Comes Testing of X99S GAMING 7 and Intel P3700
Here is third party news, please check PVEVA review as below
------------------------resource：http://bbs.pceva.com.cn/thread-113902-1-1.html------
I heard that MSI has updated BOIS recently. From now on, all the 9 Series motherboards support NVMe device. As a result, I borrowed a NVMe SSD Intel DC P3700 400GB from MSI and tested it
Intel DC P3700 have equipped with PCIe 3.0 x4 slot，capacity from 400GB to 2TB，what I borrowed is 400GB version just looks like normal PCIe SSD.
Why the SSD uses PCIe?
SATA 6Gb/s is fulfilled with traditional Hard Disk, but the speed is far from the SSD. With the PCIe, it helps to increase and extend the connection function. And help to improve the performance.。
AHCI compare to NVMe
While Advanced Host Controller Interface (AHCI) interface has the benefit of legacy software compatibility, it does not deliver optimal performance when a SSD is connected via PCI Express bus. NVMe has been designed from the ground up, capitalizing on the low latency and parallelism of PCI Express SSDs, and fulfilling the parallelism of contemporary CPUs, platforms and applications. NVMe brings various performance improvements is the reason why it was burned
The NVM Express, Inc. is directed by a thirteen-member board of directors selected by the promoter group, which includes Avago Technologies, Cisco, Dell, EMC, Intel, NetApp, Oracle etc. and develop by around eighty companies.
NVM Express, NVMe, or Non-Volatile Memory Host Controller Interface Specification (NVMHCI), is a specification for accessing solid-state drives (SSDs) attached through the PCI Express (PCIe) bus.
The biggest advantage of NVMe is the lowest latency. Because of streamlined storage stack method, NVMe can command without registers. However, each command of AHCI needs four unbuffered registers and it will cause 2.5 μs data latency.
The other important revolution of NVMe is supporting more queues and this technology can enhance Muti-Core of CPU’s performance; the IOPS will not be influenced by single-core of CPU.
Enterprise market will be huge benefits from NVMe. NVMe technology could reduce the HD loading and extend the battery life indirectly.
In conclusion, PCIe hardware interface brings a high-bandwidth (sustained R/W performance), thank for native PCIe controller, it reduces latency controller (R/W performance under low QD upgrade, if it is directly connected to the CPU PCIe lanes , the performance is more obvious when the CPU overclocked). Also, NVMe software interface software is reduced latency of software.(random R/W performance of multi-core CPU under high QD)
Let’s comes to the actual testing. To avoid decrease the Link Speed of graphic card, we put P3700 at second PCIe slot.X99S Gaming 7 supported the NVMe from the BIOS version 17.6 last year.
Test basic：
CPU：Intel Core i7-5960X
Motherboard：MSI X99S GAMING 7
Memory：Avexir DDR4-2400 4GBx4
Graphics card：MSI GTX 660 TwinFrozr
HD：
Plextor PX-128M2P（system）
Intel DC P3700 400GB（Test 1）
Plextor PX-G512M6e（Test 2）
Power supply：SilverStone SX-600G
Cooler：Noctua NH-D14
OS：Windows 8.1 Update 3
The driver from intel official website is much more compatibility than the NVMe driver original from Win 8.1.
Download link : https://downloadcenter.intel.com ... =3810&DwnldID=23929
During the testing, we need to do security eraser several times, therefore; we need to download the Intel Data Center.
Download link : https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?DwnldID=23931
Device manager of P3700 NVMe device in Windows 8.1
SMART information should be checked from Intel Data Center. CrystalDiskInfo can’t read
Wear Leveling:
The following is benchmark test. ASSSD Benchmark and CrystalDiskMark software cannot push SSD performance to extreme level, so we use TxBench to test the performance of 32GB data transmission. TxBench in Win8.1 with native driver, sequential read is up to 1375MB/s and write is 1072MB/s. In 4K single QD test, there is not big difference between SATA3.0 and PCIe. In other side, the performance of 4K QD32 test, SATA3.0 is 50% better than PCIe.
After installing NVMe driver, the performance of sequential R/W is dramatically improvement. Especially in read function, the performance is directly double to 2800MB/s, achieving the highest level we never saw. It’s the real performance of this SSD.
As I mentioned before, native PCIe controller could decrease the latency of SDD. The R/W performance increase after CPU overclock to 4G as well.
Compare to PCIE 2.0 x2 AHCI by Plextor PX-G512M6e
overall review：
Conclusion:
I just introduce the overview of VVMe technology and the Intel P7300 basic performance. We found out that the advantages of NVMe comparing to the AHCI, it will be more and more common in the future.
MSI 9 series motherboards supported NVMe device. Although NVMe is not popular, MSI keep the scalability of the motherboards. In the next article, we will test P3700 under business environment to see the performance and advantage.

Quote from: MSI-MKT on 17-March-15, 14:10:11
[Motherboard] MSI Motherboard supported NVMe device. Comes Testing of X99S GAMING 7 and Intel P3700
Here is third party news, please check PVEVA review as below
------------------------resource：
It's PCEVA. got a typo lol.
anyway it's a nice article from China media. thanks for the translation.

How to send email to MSI tech support

To send and email to MSI tech support click on the releveant link at:
MSI Tech Support

Hi,
Here is a sample code to send email:
public static string SendEmail(
SPWeb spWeb,
string from,
string to,
string cc,
string bcc,
string subject,
string body,
bool isBodyHtml)
LogHelper.LogMethodStart(logger, "SPEmailHelper", "SendEmail");
string emailSummary;
var messageHeaders = new StringDictionary();
ValidationHelper.VerifyStringArgument(to, "to");
ValidationHelper.VerifyStringArgument(from, "from");
ValidationHelper.VerifyStringArgument(subject, "subject");
ValidationHelper.VerifyStringArgument(cc, "cc");
ValidationHelper.VerifyStringArgument(bcc, "bcc");
messageHeaders.Add("to", to);
messageHeaders.Add("from", from);
messageHeaders.Add("subject", subject);
messageHeaders.Add("cc", cc);
messageHeaders.Add("bcc", bcc);
string mimeType = "text/plain";
if (isBodyHtml)
mimeType = "text/html";
messageHeaders.Add("content-type", mimeType);
bool sendMail = SPUtility.SendEmail(
spWeb,
messageHeaders,
body);
if (sendMail)
emailSummary = "<EmailMessage>" +
"<To>" + to + "</To>" +
"<From>" + from + "</From>" +
"<Subject>" +
SPEncode.HtmlEncode(subject) +
"</Subject>" +
"<CC>" + cc + "</CC>" +
"<BCC>" + bcc + "</BCC>" +
"<Body>" +
SPEncode.HtmlEncode(body) +
"</Body>" +
"</EmailMesage>";
else
throw new SafException("Failed to send email.");
LogHelper.LogMethodEnd(logger, "SPEmailHelper", "SendEmail");
return emailSummary;
Source: https://www.collaboris.com/blogs/collaboris-blog/mark-jones/2012/11/06/code-sample-how-to-programmatically-send-an-email-in-sharepoint#.VN3GG9eqqko
Please remember to up-vote or mark the reply as answer if you find it helpful.

K7t266pro-2-ru Terrible Mobo! MSI Tech support non existent

I have a K7t266pro-2-ru ver 2.0 and it will not boot from floppy to dos. Therefore I cannot update the bios nor load an operating system. Tried Update 2 but they have you make a floppy.( which this board won't boot from. )Wrote to MSI Tech support several times(You think they would know the problem) never getting any answer. Think I will get an Asus or Biostar Motherboard and throw this one away. Tried everything including loading hard drive on another computer. Works then(Sort of) No way to disable bios protection.(Not even in the list) Anyone interested in a motherboard CHEAP
Waynelk ?(

Quote
Originally posted by MerlinuXP
I absolutely 110% agree with you waynelk, how on earth can it be a WinXP problem when the motherboard is set to boot from floppy BUT DOESN'T!... :O
Its the Motherboard, and i too am having problems with my MSI at the moment for different reasons, which is also leading me to a decision for another motherboard (Gigabyte/Epox are mobo's i have never had ANY problems with, and if there were any, there is excellent support for both of these)
I don't think it is a faulty motherboard, since other ppl are claiming to have the same problems with this model motherboard. Msi need to program Bios a little better than they're doing, since i think it may be a bios problem. X(
I'm not 100% sure it's a bios problem since there have to be others using this board without problems. I have tried different versions with no success. I would suspect a design flaw. Note this board has been discontinued. When I use Si Soft Sandra it did not even have the 1.44 floppy in the list of supported floppy drives. On mine the floppy drive works after the O/S gets up and running but will not boot to the floppy. I got disgusted with tech support and bought a Gigabyte GA-7vrxp. Works great, but now I have a very expensive K7T266 Pro-2 RU paperweight. Not even sure if I want to send it back to get fixed. Seems like throwing good money after bad considering the lack of support. Hate to bash MSI but I'm calling it the way I see it, after many attempts to get any kind of response what so ever. I will try a different brand of floppy as Bas suggested but I don't have much hope.
Waynelk

Clocking MSI Ti4800SE-TD8X(MS-8900)

Hi everyone! My question is: Can I clock my card to 300/650 without any extra cooling?? I have heard this somewhere that with the big fan on my VGA-card I can easily do so, but I thought maybe I should get some expert help before doing so if possible! So everyone who knows wheter it is possible to clock my MSI Ti4800SE-TD8X(MS-8900) (currenlty @ 275/554) to 300/650 please post a reply, bye! :D

ApA,
When you get to those speeds it will be hit or miss. One board might, while an identical will not. It is all the luck of the draw with the RAM.
Take Care,
Richard

MSI tech support

I paid good money for my system and one of the components is the Neo2 - LS 865PE. I use WindowsMe with all the updates and all the MSI supplied drivers with all onboard stuff and a flawless Radeon 128 meg. I cannot put my system in S3 mode because half of the times it does not come out of it. MSI tech support insulted me by telling me to activate S3 in bios and install OS after. That is their answer. My answer to MSI is you make GARBAGE.

Quote
Originally posted by Del UK
Well, it should not matter which OS...... if you "tease" a person on OS, they will react NEG.......
I could FLAW all MS OS's especially XP.........but the point is to HELP!
Not make the user feel unwelcome........
Please be quiet.........SoCalMX.....you are NOT helping
Del
you know what? someone suggested that he upgrade his OS and he went crazy over that! most of the posts were revolving around this and I was laughin about it, thats all! I could care less if he kept using Windows ME for the rest of his life. The point IS that he came in here to RANT AND RAVE! NOT ask for help and its OBVIOUS. When someone doesn't want anyone's help and they make it obvious in a place where we are SUPPOSED to help others, then they shouldn't be here. THE END! Don't tell me to be quiet, THAT is just asking for a NEGATIVE response.
As for the problem, the first thing I would've suggested is that the OS doesnt handle S3 well... 2nd thing would've been the PSU, maybe its too weak. Notice that no matter what advice he was given, he basically said "its MSI, nothing else" or something along those lines...
sorry about my posts in this thread, it was light hearted (and probably still my mistake to post something light hearted, again I apologize), but now it got too serious. This thread should be deleted as it doesn't benefit anyone here.

Msi Ti4800SE VTD8X problem???

Hi
I've just got myself a Msi Ti4800SE VTD8X, and i checked for the total video memory using 3DMark2001, 3Dmark2003 and sisoft sandra2003. They all show the same information, which are 64M, sometimes 32M., somtimes 0M, and sometimes 128M (though not too often at 128M). The information differs each time after rebooting the system.
However, when i play games it seems fine.
Please tell me if it could have been a problem with the video memory, or the software that i've used.
and what should i do?
oh...I'm using windowsXP pro (service pack 1).
the power supply is Antec 550W TrueControl.
thanks

Hola Exequiel,
One thing I forgot, you Desktop. There is no reason to run your desktop at 32bit color, set it to 16 bit. Running your desktop at 32bit color means any games will have to render your desktop in the background in 32bit color even though you cannot see it.
As for overclocking, if your 2200+ is the old Tbred A, it is a very poor overclocker, if it is the Tbred B, then you can really overclock it. (There are manual settings on your motherboard, but if you do not have really good cooling I would not do it.)
As for your Vid Card, you get a great boost in performance by overclocking the RAM than the Core. Before you start, you must be happy with the fact you could destroy the card and end uo with an expensive new key chain. 8o I use 3DMark2001SE to test my overclock. If I were to overclock your card, I would bump the core and RAM 15Mhz the first time. Then from there only bump the RAM a couple of Mhz at a time and run the Benchmark. If it locks the computer up, turn the computer off and lower your settings. If you see garbage on the screen hit the esc key, lower your overclock and test again till you know it is stable.
But remember this can destroy your card and you will be without a video card and need to buy a new one.
Saludos,
Ricardo

MSi website support not working - poor service!

MSi website support is not working. Everytime I try to contact them using the support tickets I get a garbled message on screen and once you click the OK button it clears your ticket with nothing posted.
It's a very poor way for a company supposed to be a BIG company showing support to its customers.
You can't telephone them, cannot now use the ticket support, and can only HOPE someone from their technical department reads THIS.
I sent them an email about it and I'm just waiting to hear from them.
It makes me want to change to ASUS in future!

Ok I'll try to remain calm as I've just received a warning about "bashing" MSi.
I'll include the screenshot again for your attention. At least the moderators here are reviewing the situation it seems, which, on a large forum, I didn't think would be noticed.
After going through advice of how to update my BIOS with their technical help on the website I flashed my MSi Z68A-GD65 (B3) successfully to version 22.8. It was playing up before that on the orginal BIOS, slowing down in Windows, not recognizing various USB devices, and I had a Primary BIOS led flashing which meant it had failed on the mobo so the computer wasn't coming out of 'sleep' very good (I just left it on all the time instead).
22.8 made it seem to be at it's best then I contacted them on which update next; they said P.1. Unlike the previous one which I flashed inside the BIOS using M-flash, this had to be done in DOS which I did.
I saw a brief message which I think said updating should not be done while it is overclocked (I had the OC button on) but other than that it went through and said update was "successful". That was the last message my machine made.
It is now in a constant 'boot loop' which lasts about 10 seconds, not enough time to interrupt or use a boot device, and just cycles switching off to booting then switching off, etc.
I've seen many cases of this and it must be a common problem, as I did everything as instructed and still it went wrong.
After lots of communication MSi UK agreed to inform the service department for a RMA to be sent to me, even though it was out-of-warranty. Then they closed the ticket. I opened a new ticket asking why they closed the ticket and I still had not received any RMA, they told me not to worry the RMA will be coming, then closed that ticket.
After waiting 10 days I tried to use the website form again filling out all the criteria on the form and instead I get this garbled writing with the OK button as I mentioned, which just sends you back to the home page with nothing updated.
So I am really frustrated at this point, unable to phone MSi (they won't talk to you), use the website (in UK) and have had to explain everything through an email correspondence, hence my lack of patience on this forum.
For years I put my faith in MSi products, I have a Nvidia graphics card also, and they are the market leader with the best looking designs and most powerful components. But they should provide better customer support when things go wrong and are failing anyone who resides in the UK with a website service which doesn't work, and closing tickets before the problem has been sorted or the RMA has been sent.
I hope you understand.

MSI TI4800SE supported resolutions.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for