MSI X58A-GD65 Flash/Re-Flash the New/Same BIOS

Hello.
I have some trouble with overclocking.
The BIOS always saves the Voltage settings but not the multiplier and MHZ and I would like to Re-Flash the same BIOS or a new one.
I can't find the BIOS that I have already flashed and the Live Update does not have any BIOS updates so I came here to ask.
Can I update to version V22.2 from this page? http://eu.msi.com/product/mb/X58A-GD65.html#/?div=BIOS
How can I find the BIOS that I already have and re-flash it?
PS) Please stay to topic questions don't tell me anything about my Cell Menu settings. They are fine because I have tried countless times to save them and only a few times they were actually saved and worked at 4 Ghz.

Maybe others know why your board is stated to only be available thru live update but a quick google search and I found a link to a file with the exact same name as that bios.
http://www.msi.com/service/download/bios-14654.html (bios version 22.2) I'm assuming it's the same one stated on the page for your board that you linked.
I would wait for the more knowledgable people to say what method to use or if it's safe before just flashing anything.
BTW- live update sucks and never seems to work properly. When I first got my board I was thrilled to see an update function built into the bios. first thing I did was use it and it flashed my bios to a version older than what it shipped with!

Similar Messages

MSI X58A-GD65 new BIOS

I have motherboard MSI X58A-GD65 bought in September.
It is possible to flash it new BIOS v.23.0 or not?
Now i have BIOS v. 22.1

Hello every body.
Does anyone check 7522vM3 22.3 bios?, the 22.2 was a disaster, but what about 22.3?, or perhaps it works and resolve the problem of suspension state when you make overclocking.
Code: [Select]
X58 Platinum / X58 Platinum SLI = BIOS version 3xx
X58 Pro / X58 Pro SLI / X58 Pro-E / X58 Pro-E SLI = BIOS version 8xx
X58A-GD45 = BIOS version Pxx
X58A-GD65 = BIOS version Mxx
X58A-GD65 = BIOS version Nxx
The BIOS is for LiveUpdate ONLY!
No need to post BIOS Mxx & Nxx since there are different BIOS version
with the same marketing name.
X58A-GD65 (MS-7522) V22.3 BIOS Release
1. This is AMI BIOS release
2. This BIOS fixes the following problem of the previous version:
- Update CPU micro code.
- Improved memory compatibility.
- Update LAN option ROM.
3. 2011/03/21
Quote from: SuperCurro on 14-January-11, 15:26:07
My experience with X58A-GD65 Bios
22.0 = dont get out from suspension state, Overclock runs ok
22.1 = it runs ok, OC ok
22.2= it has lots of problems, the main is the inestability of raid 0 over SSD, lots of blue screens, OC inestable.
So, dont upgrade to 22.2, stay in 22.1.
The upgrade of the bios shoud be done from the BIOS (you have an option to upgrade with an usb memory stick).
My computer
Game PC: Antec Solo & MSI X58A-GD65 & i7-950 @3.8GHz & 6GB 2:10 1600Mhz O.C.Auto
DELL 3007WFP-HC* & 2x470GTX SLI & GF9800GT_physx
Raid0 2xOCZSSD2-2VTXE 240G + Raid0 640Gb + 2 TB & Zboard MERC & G5 & G25 Xi-Fi & Z-Logitech 5400

Each time I create a new album in IPhoto, photos from another album or from photo stream are automatically dumped into the new album.. how do I create a blank album and then import photos from a flash drive into the new album?

each time I create a new album in IPhoto, photos from another album or from photo stream are automatically dumped into the new album.. how do I create a blank album and then import photos from a flash drive into the new album?

just import the iPhoto
Surely you meant "just import the photo"? The Spell checker is dangerously creative !

Flash player on the new mac sarafi can't use keyboard and event listener

flash player on the new mac sarafi can't use keyboard and event listener
cn:英文有些差不好意思，附上中文说明：在flash player web 开发时，我在最新版本的sarafi上，目前出现不能响应键盘事件bug,为了验证是不是我本地问题，我也用在多款别的网页游戏上进行测试，全有这个bug，另外，有时还有那个fp弹出本地缓存提示设置窗口也点不了“允许或拒绝“那些按钮

Now after 5 weeks, you have always not resolved this very important and urgent issue. It seems that Adobe has realy abandonned the actionscript / flash player projects. Why not simply discontinue flash player on desktops too ? Or even better remove or block "automaticaly" all flash players with the final update. That could create a serious issue on the Internet for few weeks but at least that will be honorable end like a Samurai's Seppuku...

I try and add music to my iTunes and it never shows up. The cloud icon just flashes forever and the new music is never actually put into the library.

I try and add music to my iTunes and it never shows up. The cloud icon just flashes forever and the new music is never actually put into the library. When I use the search bar the new song shows up but I cannot click on it or anything

Why has no one replied to this question (asked loads of times by different people) Whats the solution!!!!!! Help!!!!

MOVED: MSI X58A-GD65 BIOS Cell Menu Bugs!

This topic has been moved to Overclockers & Modding Corner.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=143541.0

Quote from: HU16E on 05-December-10, 03:11:14
Recommend opening a ticket with MSI Tech Support & describing in detail the problems you are having with the new bios. Since this is a user to user forum, nothing concerning a bios revision or the like is going to get fixed here. About the only advice anyone here could give would be maybe some new setting in the bios has been added, or a setting has been overlooked preventing the desired results.
After taking a peek in the manual, nothing is shown about the board having these setting options. It's possible the new bios has incorporated it. It would show up in bios Cell Menu & the description of what it is & what it does would be in the info box to the right. When OC'ing, make sure to disable Spread Spectrum. After the bios update, did you remove the power cord from the PSU & clear CMOS?
I have disabled the "Spread Spectrum" because it caused slow perfomance especially in SSD.
About the power cord and clear cmos. No, never, ever.
Full System Specs:
Tower: CoolerMaster Cosmos RC-1000
PSU: CoolerMaster Real Power M850
CPU: Intel Core i7 920
CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster V8
Motherboard: MSI X58A-GD65
RAM: OCZ DDR3 PC3-12800 Intel® i7 Triple Channel [3x2GB, 1600 MHZ, 8-8-8-24]
SSD: A-Data X25 80GB by Intel (Model: SSDSA2MH080G1GN) [Sata 2]
VGA: Sapphire Radeon HD4870 1GB
HDD1: Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB (WD1001FALS) [Sata 2]
HDD2: Western Digital 250GB [Sata 1]
HDD3: Western Digital Caviar Black 640GB (WD6402AAEX) [Sata 3]
Optical 1: Samsung 223QRSMN DVD-RW [Sata ?]
OS: Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
I don't see the point of posting system specs because I'm sure it's a bug, the bios refuses to save the Cell Menu options but whatever. I can't argue with that because this information is crucial to most issues

MOVED: MSI X58A-GD65 Overclock Problem

This topic has been moved to Overclockers & Modding Corner.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=141883.0

I bought the MSI X58A-GD65 because I am a complete moron who wanted a hardware Easy Switch.
It works really well,but I was pissed when I noticed that my 12GB's of RAM was no longer recorgnized. Only showed 8GB's..............
So I set the Easy Switch to deafualt ( 133 ) and decided to overclock the CPU and tweak the RAM.
I just read every forum where people had problems w/ various settings, and since I only want 3.2GHz w/ 12GB's of RAM @1.4v it was a walk in the park.
Clearing the CMOS after a day of torturing myelf and committing Human errors,I easily was able to simply undervolt the RAM from the 1.65v default,and raise the 133 default setting up by a factor of 5 and rebooting.
So this is my first OVerclocking experience and MSI seems like a worthy board..
I use this to perform hardware and virtual musical synths and instruments 6 nights a week.
Since I cam from a solid 32bit DAW that ran 100% for 3 yerars,I didn't upgrade, but actually did an entire new rebuild since I wasn't sure ofthe stability in x64.
But this DAW has worked for days on end now flawlessley.
I Declare This Dog Will Hunt.............

MSI X58A-GD65 Overclock Problem

Hi there,
I have been trying to overclock my mainboard and it doesnt change my Clock Frequency, actually it changes but when I try to reboot system, it comes back to 133mhz again! I'm sure that it is not failure of overclocking, what should I do about this problem?
Every detail can change but clock frequency...!
I updated mainboard by the way to the last firmware.
NOTE: I manually change frequency on mainboard to 200mhz. now Setup says 200 mhz, while computer starts, startup says 200mhz, in Windows, it says 133 mhz! even CPUZ says 133mhz!... what is going on :S

I bought the MSI X58A-GD65 because I am a complete moron who wanted a hardware Easy Switch.
It works really well,but I was pissed when I noticed that my 12GB's of RAM was no longer recorgnized. Only showed 8GB's..............
So I set the Easy Switch to deafualt ( 133 ) and decided to overclock the CPU and tweak the RAM.
I just read every forum where people had problems w/ various settings, and since I only want 3.2GHz w/ 12GB's of RAM @1.4v it was a walk in the park.
Clearing the CMOS after a day of torturing myelf and committing Human errors,I easily was able to simply undervolt the RAM from the 1.65v default,and raise the 133 default setting up by a factor of 5 and rebooting.
So this is my first OVerclocking experience and MSI seems like a worthy board..
I use this to perform hardware and virtual musical synths and instruments 6 nights a week.
Since I cam from a solid 32bit DAW that ran 100% for 3 yerars,I didn't upgrade, but actually did an entire new rebuild since I wasn't sure ofthe stability in x64.
But this DAW has worked for days on end now flawlessley.
I Declare This Dog Will Hunt.............

MSI X58A-GD65 BIOS Cell Menu Bugs!

Hello,
I updated the bios to the latest version according to MSI's website (Update Date 2010-11-17 version 2.22)
I had configured everything from scratch and even Cell Menu options.
I had my CPU overclocked to 4.0 GHZ (20x200) and RAM to 1600 and in Extreme Profile 1 (8-8-8-24).
I verified that everything was ok and stabled (I did a couple of benchmarks and torture tests to be assured)
I noticed today that the BIOS refuses to run with the overclocked settings
By refusal I mean, it boots fine but it boots at 133x20! (2660 mhz)
I tried setting the options again and nothing happened everything stayed the same.
Also I have disabled ALL POWER SAVING FEATURES like Green Power, Intel EIST and the like
Some proof: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1514841
PS) I refuse to use the old bios because the old bios was worse than the current one and I will have more trouble with it.
Give me a solution please.

Quote from: HU16E on 05-December-10, 03:11:14
Recommend opening a ticket with MSI Tech Support & describing in detail the problems you are having with the new bios. Since this is a user to user forum, nothing concerning a bios revision or the like is going to get fixed here. About the only advice anyone here could give would be maybe some new setting in the bios has been added, or a setting has been overlooked preventing the desired results.
After taking a peek in the manual, nothing is shown about the board having these setting options. It's possible the new bios has incorporated it. It would show up in bios Cell Menu & the description of what it is & what it does would be in the info box to the right. When OC'ing, make sure to disable Spread Spectrum. After the bios update, did you remove the power cord from the PSU & clear CMOS?
I have disabled the "Spread Spectrum" because it caused slow perfomance especially in SSD.
About the power cord and clear cmos. No, never, ever.
Full System Specs:
Tower: CoolerMaster Cosmos RC-1000
PSU: CoolerMaster Real Power M850
CPU: Intel Core i7 920
CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster V8
Motherboard: MSI X58A-GD65
RAM: OCZ DDR3 PC3-12800 Intel® i7 Triple Channel [3x2GB, 1600 MHZ, 8-8-8-24]
SSD: A-Data X25 80GB by Intel (Model: SSDSA2MH080G1GN) [Sata 2]
VGA: Sapphire Radeon HD4870 1GB
HDD1: Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB (WD1001FALS) [Sata 2]
HDD2: Western Digital 250GB [Sata 1]
HDD3: Western Digital Caviar Black 640GB (WD6402AAEX) [Sata 3]
Optical 1: Samsung 223QRSMN DVD-RW [Sata ?]
OS: Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
I don't see the point of posting system specs because I'm sure it's a bug, the bios refuses to save the Cell Menu options but whatever. I can't argue with that because this information is crucial to most issues

Overclocking MSI X58A-GD65

Greetings to all!
I would like to overlock my computer properly in order to be able to achieve better perfomance in gaming
That is due to the reason I don't want to spend more money to this computer (I have already spent a lot)
My system build is:
Tower: CoolerMaster Cosmos RC-1000
PSU: CoolerMaster Real Power M850
CPU: Intel Core i7 920
CPU Cooler: CoolerMaster V8
Motherboard: MSI X58A-GD65
RAM: OCZ DDR3 PC3-12800 Intel® i7 Triple Channel [3x2GB, 1600 MHZ, 8-8-8-24
SSD: A-Data X25 80GB by Intel (Model: SSDSA2MH080G1GN) [Sata 2]
VGA: Sapphire Radeon HD4870 1GB
HDD1: Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB (WD1001FALS) [Sata 2]
HDD2: Western Digital 250GB [Sata 1]
HDD3: Western Digital Caviar Black 640GB (WD6402AAEX) [Sata 3]
Optical 1: Samsung 223QRSMN DVD-RW [Sata ?]
OS: Windows 7 x64 Ultimate
As you can see my build can be considered high-end.
So far I have overclocked CPU to run at 3.0 GHZ and RAM speed at 1800 MHZ.
If I set CPU to run at a higher speed the system boots fine but the OS refuses to start
Also I have encountered some hang ups in games. I believe it's because of the automized RAM timings.
In order to overclock I have to access the "Cell Menu" in BIOS Settings.
The Cell Menu has exactly these options:
Current Core Frequency: 3.00 GHZ (150x20)
Current DRAM Frequency: 1800 MHZ
Current QPI Frequency: 4.8000 GT
->CPU Specifications (it has information about what technologies Core i7 920 supports)
->CPU Feature: Intel EIST, Intel C-State, C1E Support, Overspeed Protection, Hyper-Threading Function,
Execute Bit Support, Set Limit CPUID Max Val to , Intel Virtualiation Tech, INtel VT-d Tech
->Intel Eist: Disabled, Enabled, Auto
->C1E Support: Disabled, Enabled
->Adjust CPU Base Frequency (MHz): 100-400 mhz (Current: 150)
->Adjust CPU Ratio: 12-21 (Current: 20)
->Adjusted CPU Frequency (MHz): 3000 mhz
->Memory -Z: DIMM1,3,5 Memory SPD Information
Quote
DIMM 1 Memory SPD Infromation
Memory Type: DDR3 SDRAM
Max Bandwidth: DDR3-1066 (533 MHZ)
Manufacture: OCZ
Part Number: OCZ3X1600LV2G
Serial Number: 00000000
->X.M.P Support Information:
Code: [Select]
X.M.P Support
Max Bandwidth: DDR3-1800 (900 MHZ)
Memory Voltage: 1.65V
SDRAM Cycle Time: 1.111ns (1CLK)
DRAM TCL: 10.000 ns (9CLK)
DRAM TRCD: 10.000ns (9CLK)
DRAM TRP: 10.000ns (9CLK)
DRAM TRAS: 30.000 ns (27clk)
DRAM TRFC: 90.000 ns (81clk)
DRAM TWR: 15.000ns (14CLK)
DRAM TWTR: 7.555 ns (7clk)
DRAM TRRD: 6.000 ns (6CLK)
DRAM TRTP: 7.555ns (7clk)
SDRAM Cycle Time: 1.875 ns (1CLK)
DRAM TCL: 13.125ns (7clk)
DRAM TRCD: 13.125ns (7clk)
DRAM TRP: 13.125ns (7clk)
DRAM TRAS: 30.000ns (16clk)
DRAM TRC: 49.500ns (27clk)
DRAM TRFC: 110.000ns (59clk)
DRAM TWR: 15.000ns (8clk)
DRAM TWTR: 7.500ns (4clk)
DRAM TRRD: 7.500ns (4clk)
DRAM TRTP: 7.500ns (4clk)
Current DRAM Channel 1 Timing: 0-0-0-0
Current DRAM Channel 2 Timing: 0-0-0-0
Current DRAM Channel 3 Timing: 0-0-0-0
DRAM Timing Mode: Auto(1), Unlick(2), Link(3)
Quote
If set to Auto (1):
Advance Dram Configuration: Is grayed out
If set to Unlick(2):
->Advance DRAM Configuration:
Code: [Select]
CH1 1T/2T Memory Timing: 1-3
CH1 CAS Latency (CL): 4-15
CH1 tRCD: 3-15
CH1 tRP: 3-15
CH1 tRAS: 9-31
CH1 tRFC: 30-255
CH1 tWR: 0-15
CH1 tWTR: 0-15
Ch1 tRRD: 0-7
CH1 tRTP: 0-15
CH1 tFAW: 15-63
CH1 B2B-CAS Delay: 0-31
[color=#696969]Current CH1 tdrRDTRD,TWR,TRD,TRD etc... [/color]
->Channel 1 Advance Timing: Auto, Manual
---> If set to Manual these options appear:
CH1 tdrRdTRd: 3-9
CH1 tddRdTRd: 3-9
CH1 tsrRdTWRr: 3-17
CH1 tdrRdTWr: 3-17
CH1 tddRdTWr: 3-17
CH1 tsrWrTRd: 11-25
Ch1 tdrWrTRd: 2-8
CH1 tddWrTRd: 2-8
CH1 tdrWrTWr: 3-9
CH1 tddWrTwr: 3-9
CH1 tsrRdTRd: 4 or 6 DRAM clocks
CH1 tsrWrTWr: 4 or 6 DRAM clocks
CH1 Round Trip Latency: 1-255
Then I have Channel 2 and 3 which have the same options as Channel 1
->Extreme Memory Profile: Disabled, Profile 1, Profile 2. If set to a profile option "Extreme Memory Profiles Mode: Advance" appears
-> Memory Ratio: Auto, 3-8 (Current: 6)
Adjusted DRAM Frequency DRAM Frequency (MHz: 1800)
->Uncore Ratio: Auto, 6-20 (Current: 12)
Adjusted Uncore Frequency (MHZ): 3600
->QPI Configuration: Quote
QPI Links Speed: Full-speed, Slow-mode (Current: Full)
QPI Frequency: Auto, 4.8 GT, 5.866 GT, 6.4 GT (Current: Auto)
->Clockgen Tuner: Quote
CPU Amplitude Control: 700-1000mv (Current 900MV)
PCI Express Amplitude Control: 700-100mv (Current 900MV)
CPU CLK Skew: Normal, 100-1500ps (Current Normal)
IOH CLK Skew: Normal, 100-1500ps (Current Normal)
->Adjust PCI Frequency (MHZ): Auto, 37.3 42 (Current Auto)
-> Adjust PCI-E Frequency (MHZ): 100-200 MHZ (Current 100)
-> Auto Disable PCI/PCI-E Frequency: Enabled, Disabled (Current Enabled)
->CPU Voltage (V): Auto, +0.00-+0.630 (Details: when voltage is high the text is colored in red meaning that's its dangerous), -0.020- -0.320 (The text is colored in grey meaning that these options are safe) (Current: +0.300)
->CPU PLL Voltage (V): Auto, 1.00-2.43 (When voltage is high or very low, text is red-colored) (Current: 1.85)
->QPI Voltage (V): Auto, 0.88-1.83 (When voltage is high or very low, text is red-colored) (Current: Auto)
->DRAM Voltage (V): Auto, 1.20-2.77 (When voltage is high or very low, text is red-colored) (Current: 1.65) (Details say: "According to the INtel CPU spec, DRAM Voltage setting 1.65v may damage the cpu permanently. It is strongly recommended that you install the dram with the voltage setting below 1.65V. "
->DDR_VREF_CA_A,B,C: Auto, 0.510-1.225 (When voltage is high or very low, text is red-colored) (Current: Auto)
->DDR_VREF_DQ_A,B,C: Auto, 0.699-0.985 (When voltage is high or very low, text is red-colored) (Current: Auto)
->IOH Voltage (V): Auto, 0.76-2.64 (When voltage is high or very low, text is red-colored) (Current: Auto)
->ICH Voltage (V): Auto, 0.70-2.13 (When voltage is high or very low, text is red-colored) (Current: Auto)
-> Spread Spectrum: Disabled, Enabled
Text in blue means that these options are Disabled by me
Reasons: These technologies conserve power, I want to have better perfomance not to conserve energy.
Text in grey means that these options cannot be changed
Ouf, that all the options in Cell menu... This motherboard must have been designed for professional overclockers.
So any suggestions, any guides that I should follow?
I have heard and seen on the internet that Core i7 920 can reach 4,0 GHZ but not quite stable can I achieve such perfomance with good stability?
How do I get the real full specifications of these RAMs?
Should I enable some of the CPU features to conserve power and have a better temperature?
Should I enable also green power?
PS) Again to clarify it. I'm aiming for perfomance.

Quote from: Jack on 23-November-10, 21:46:51
It does not make sense to try overclocking the CPU and rhe memory at the same time, as it does not allow you to know if stability problems are caused by instable memory settings or instable CPU related settings.
Because of that, you should split your whole OC task into two obectives:
1. Objective: Overclock the CPU, not the memory.
2. Objective: Once the desired CPU Overclock is reached & stable, start worrying about the memory.
To reach your first objective, please keep your memory speeds as low as possible (keep it @DDR3-1066) and focus on the processor only.
So should I leave all the RAM options to Auto?

MSI X58A-GD65 Voltage problem

Merry Christmas all.!
I've just purchased a MSI X58A-GD65 and I'm have a few problems overclocking with it. My setup is MSI X58A-GD65, Intel i7 950. 6gb dominator 2000 GT.
The problem I'm having is I can't access any voltage controls for the CPU and memory in the BIOS. They are all greyed out and say [AUTO].. No matter what I change I can't access them. What am I doing wrong guys?
I have updated the BIOS to v.2.2 also..
Thanks,
Mcbonio

Found the sticky as soon as I posted.! Felt like a right dunce.!
Thanks.!!

[MSI X58A-GD65] Overclocking, stabilizing and testing a Core i7 920

Greetings,
I have overlcoked my i7 920 to 4.000 MHZ and I would like to run some tests just to be sure about it's stability.
The RAMS have been succesfully tested with Memtest86+ which is included in Ubuntu 11.10 distributions.
However, blue screens rarely occur.
If my current knowledge does not deceive me:
a) The more volts the more stability, heat and power consumption rate
b) Green/eco, less power consumption, Intel states are cr*p, right? I use a Power Wattage meter and the watt consumption does not fall below 400 Watts (it's the same when it's overclocked).
c) In my own experience Intel Turbo (21x Multiplier), states cause instability
Full System Specs:
Case: Coolermaster Cosmos RC1000
PSU: Coolermaster M850
M/B: MSI X58A-GD65
CPU: Intel Core i7 920 2.66 GHZ
CPU Cooler: Coolermaster V8
RAM: OCZ Core i7 Edition 8-8-8-24 1600 MHZ
VGA: Sapphire Radeon HD4870 1GB
HDD:
a) Intel SSD 80GB Postville
b) 2x Western Digital WD1002FAEX Caviar Black 1 TB [SATA 3] [Raid 0]
c) 1x Western Digital WD1001FALS Caviar Black 1 TB [SATA 2]
d) 1x Western Digital WD6402AAEX Caviar Black 640GB [SATA 3]
Full Current overclock settings:
CPU Features:
Code: [Select]
Intel EIST: Disabled
Intel C-State: Disabled
C1E Support: Disabled
Overspeed Protection: Disabled
Hyper-threading function: Enabled
Execute bit support: enabled
Set Limit CPUID MaxVal to 3: Disabled
Intel Virtualization Tech: Enabled
Intel VT-d tech: Enabled
Overclock Settings:
Code: [Select]
Adjust CPU Base Frequency (MHZ): 200
Adjust CPU Ratio: 20
DRAM Timing Mode: Auto
Extreme Memory Profile: Profile 1
Extreme Memory Profiles Mode: Advanced
Memory Ratio: 4
Adjusted DRAM Frequency (MHZ): 1600
Uncore Ratio: 8
Adjusted Uncore Frequency (MHZ): 3200
Adjust PCI Frequency (MHZ): Auto
Adjuest PCI-E Frequency (MHZ) 100
Auto Disable PCI/PCI-E Frequency: Enabled
QPI Configuration:
Code: [Select]
QPI Links Speed: Full-speed
QPI Frequency: 4.800GT
Clockgen Tuner
Code: [Select]
CPU Amplitude Control: 800mv
PCI Express Amplitude: 800mv
CPU CLK Skew: Normal
IOH CLK Skew: Normal
Voltage Settings:
Code: [Select]
VDroop Control: High VDroop
CPU Voltage (V): [0+300]
CPU PLL Voltage (V): 1.96
QPI Voltage (V): 1.35
DRAM Voltage (V): 1.65
DRAM_VREF_CA_A (V): Auto
DRAM_VREF_CA_B (V): Auto
DRAM_VREF_CA_C (V): Auto
DRAM_VREF_DQ_A (V): Auto
DRAM_VREF_DQ_B (V): Auto
DRAM_VREF_DQ_C (V):Auto
IOH Voltage (V): 1.30
ICH Voltaga (V): 1.65
Spread Spectrum: Disabled
Looking for more advice/suggestions about getting more stability and performance
I know that overclocking is dangerous and can damage/destroy/cook the components such as the CPU, RAMS etc.
However, whatever happens it's my responsibility

Why are you using X.M.P. with Memory and Uncore being adjusted manually? What are the random BSOD codes? VDroop should be set to Low. PLL and CPU V. seem to be ridiculously high for a 4.0 OC. What does CPUID's CPU-Z utility show for CPU voltage? PLL, IOH, and ICH should only require the Auto setting.
Uncheck Automatically restart;

I think there is a bug in the new ec bios for gt60 2OD(ver1513)

I have put a post on:
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=182144.0
The Post:
I have bought a GT60 2OD-063CN. I download the new ec bios from the official site , the version is 1513(the stock version is 16f4EMS1 ver 5.04)
And i follow the offical instruction and unrar the files and use ecwin.bat to update the ec.
Now it is the problem.
It seems if I use the ecwin.bat, then the system will use 16f4EMS1 ver713 which is in the 353x document.
After update the v713 ec, the touch function(fan, back light etc.) is misfunctioned.
And I manually use the 16f4EMS1 ver 513 ec which is in the 352x document to update, now it seems the touch function is worked again.
So I wonder what is the differences between the 2 ec bios and what is the mechanism for ecwin.bat to judge which ec should be used?
After all the auto "ecwin.bat" file will lead you into 353x and use the wrong ec.
PS: the system is the stock win8. I have take away the barttery to reset the ec.
It seems some people faced the same problem. I hope msi could correct the ec bios update.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=181181.0

Quote from: nex86;109588
I'm having the issue on my GT70 2PE that backlight is not working before the Steel series engine drivers is loaded.
The firmware that I have flashed is w8_1763EMS1.513 and it flashed 353x because SB_DetectToolWin32.exe reported errorlevel 3.
As I know the backlight keyboard does not light on until SteelSeries Engine is loaded.

Is the "512GB PCIe-based Flash Storage" on the new mac worth the extra cost? I am comparing with a refurb with better specs (faster CPU, larger hard drive) and from what I undersand the PCIe flash storage is the big differentiator in cost.

hello - i am considering two macbook pros
NEW - http://store.apple.com/us/buy-mac/macbook-pro?product=ME294LL/A&step=config#
REFURB - http://store.apple.com/us/product/G0ML1LL/A/refurbished-macbook-pro-27ghz-quad-c ore-intel-i7-with-retina-display
The refurb actually has a faster processor and a larger hard drive. From what I understand, the big difference in cost is the new macbook pro contains "512GB PCIe-based Flash Storage" versus the refurb "768GB Flash Storage".
Is the PCIe flash storage really worth the extra cost (and smaller size)?
PS - Also I believe the brand new one has 2 GB graphics memory as opposed to 1 GB graphics memory. I don't really care about that as much as I won't be doing a lot of video editing or gaming.

RestonManJavaLuver wrote:
Is she wrong - are these actually going to people's homes, being used, then returned and resold?
Some are some are not. Otherwise Apple has a ton of Mac's sitting around that have been returned by customers under their 14 day No Questions Asked return policy.
But they not just Returned and Resold. They go back to Apple, checked out (Tested) any parts that are not up to spec replaced and then repackaged in a plain white box to be sold as refurbs.

Flash Player is the new malware !

I had a perfectly functional old Flash 10.0.32 with any security holes covered by my Security.protection
When I discovered 36 vulnerabilities I decided to "upgrade",
with no assurance that the latest version did not have at least another 100 vulnerabilities waiting to be discovered and exploited.
I was horrified that you seem to clickjack me.
I thought I was clicking for Flash 10.1, but what you gave the Firefox download manager was a GetPlus download manager.
Why on earth would I want your UNPROVEN download manager, WHICH YOU STATE HAS AN UNPATCHED VULNERABILITY ! !
I only came here to improve security on a dodgy Adobe product for which I have only rare use.
IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE THAT YOU DUMP ANOTHER HACKERS HIGHWAY ONTO MY SYSTEM.
It is also disgusting that when you gave mme Getplus INSTEAD OF the expected FLASH,
I had to accept this with no assurance that it would finally deliver Flash -
For all I knew you could have been downloading a keylogger and identity theft device.
I also am horrified by your incompetance demonstrated by the new high risk way of doing things :-
You totally failed to perform the download and upgrade after my many repeated attempts.
I gave up trying to upgrade.
Then I found that a site which always worked well now had problems due to my Flash being totally busted by your attempts.
You bungled everything - you even crippled the old version that had been functional.
I finally went back to the old way and uninstalled the broken Flash by using
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/flashplayer/current/uninstall_flash_player.exe.
I then used the old way of a direct download of Flash 10.1, but again your GetPlus download manager had its evil way.
I now have Flash plugin 10.1.53, and have removed (so far as I can see) your wretched GetPlus virus downloader.
My computer seems to have survived all your exploits,
but I am still steaming over all the needless aggravation Adobe has caused me.
When I was given this P.C. one of the first major bloat things to be un-installed was Adobe Reader.
I did not like a few 100 MBytes of bloat to do what other readers achieve with less than 10 MBytes,
and I especially did not like the fact that by the time Adobe had started up I had forgotten which PDF I needed to read.
With a little more experience I now realise there are far more important reasons to avoid / replace Adobe products.
I am now anxiously waiting for HTLM5 to replace Flash.
Alan

Thanks for the information,
but not looking forward to needing it when existing vulnerabilities are identified.
I saw that GetPlus has a vulnerability when I looked at the Adobe FAQ before I allowed GetPlus to invade me.
Google gives 8 results for "getplus vulnerability",
or 43,400 results when omitting the quotes.
The 43,4000 results are reduced to 89 when I use Advanced search to restrict the search to Adobe.com.
I forget the precise phrase I saw in the Adobe FAQ which increased my concern over the GetPlus fellowtraveller,
but it definitely advised that there was an as yet unpatched vulnerability.
I cannot now find the relevant FAQ.
I guess my efforts are hampered by my Honours degree in technology instead of a degree in stupidity.
I am pretty sure that I saw the click opportunity to access the relevant FAQ whilst enroute to actually installing this unwanted downloader,
and I have no wish to go through that aggravation again - but I assure you the admission of this problem does appear on Adobe.com.
Alan

MSI X58A-GD65 Flash/Re-Flash the New/Same BIOS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for