MSTP issue
We have ring created of 3750s and 2950 are connected to 3750 in spur. MSTP is running and multiple vlans are running across the ring. When one of 3750 is restarted 2950 connected to another 3750 is affected when 3750 goes down and comes up. Evenif STP path of 2950 and it's connected 3750 is not changing.
The MST Instances are all dependent on instance 0, the CIST. If there is a reconvergence in the CIST (in particular if the root port is changing for instance 0, which is very likely in the case of a link failure in a ring topology), there might be some "sync" events that affect all the instances, and as a result all the vlans.
Regards,
Francois
Similar Messages
-
Frequent MSTP topology changes on SF-300-08 and SG-300-10
Hi,
I am trying to configure MSTP on Layer-2 network at work. We have multiple switches connected on Wireless point-to-point links with redundent links.
MSTP is configured with multiple regions. All the servers are located in RegionA and other regions are connected to RegionA via multiple links.
There are 3 SG-300-10 switches in RegionA --- SwitchA_1, SwitchA_2 and SwitchA_3.
One of the simple regions (RegionB) has a single SF-300-08 switch (SwitchB) connected to SwitchA_2 via port e7 and SwitchA_3 via port e8. Hello Time, Forward Delay and Max Age are at their default values of 2, 15 and 20 respectively. The link between SwitchB (port e7) ---- SwitchA_2 is the primary link with cost 200,000 and the link between SwitchB (port e8) ---- SwitchA_3 is the backup link with cost 500,000.
The log on SwitchB is shows in the table below. As it is seen from the table there are frequent topology changes for very short duration (1-4 seconds) before the topology settles back to the configured one. (Primary link forwarding and secondary link blocking). During this time there have been no link failures reported.
Same thing is also observed within RegionA (SwitchA_1, SwitchA_2 and SwitchA_3 are connected to each other).
How to stop these frequent topology changes? The topology changes within RegionA causes a lot of PPPoE sessions to reset and re-establish.
Is there any way to find out what triggers these topology changes? Has anyone experienced similar behaviour?
2147464623
2011-May-24 13:54:15
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464624
2011-May-24 13:54:15
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464625
2011-May-24 13:54:15
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464626
2011-May-24 13:54:15
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464627
2011-May-24 13:54:13
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464628
2011-May-24 13:54:13
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464629
2011-May-24 13:54:13
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464630
2011-May-24 13:54:13
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464631
2011-May-24 12:53:22
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464632
2011-May-24 12:53:22
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464633
2011-May-24 12:53:22
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464634
2011-May-24 12:53:22
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464635
2011-May-24 12:53:19
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464636
2011-May-24 12:53:19
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464637
2011-May-24 12:53:19
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464638
2011-May-24 12:53:19
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464639
2011-May-24 10:56:48
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464640
2011-May-24 10:56:48
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464641
2011-May-24 10:56:48
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464642
2011-May-24 10:56:48
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464643
2011-May-24 10:56:46
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464644
2011-May-24 10:56:46
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464645
2011-May-24 10:56:46
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464646
2011-May-24 10:56:46
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464647
2011-May-24 10:35:46
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464648
2011-May-24 10:35:46
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464649
2011-May-24 10:35:46
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464650
2011-May-24 10:35:46
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464651
2011-May-24 10:35:45
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464652
2011-May-24 10:35:45
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464653
2011-May-24 10:35:45
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464654
2011-May-24 10:35:45
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464655
2011-May-24 08:52:41
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464656
2011-May-24 08:52:41
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464657
2011-May-24 08:52:41
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464658
2011-May-24 08:52:41
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464659
2011-May-24 08:52:40
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464660
2011-May-24 08:52:40
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464661
2011-May-24 08:52:40
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464662
2011-May-24 08:52:40
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464663
2011-May-24 08:04:28
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464664
2011-May-24 08:04:28
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464665
2011-May-24 08:04:28
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464666
2011-May-24 08:04:28
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464667
2011-May-24 08:04:27
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464668
2011-May-24 08:04:27
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464669
2011-May-24 08:04:27
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464670
2011-May-24 08:04:27
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464671
2011-May-24 07:38:19
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464672
2011-May-24 07:38:19
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464673
2011-May-24 07:38:19
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464674
2011-May-24 07:38:19
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464675
2011-May-24 07:38:18
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464676
2011-May-24 07:38:18
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464677
2011-May-24 07:38:18
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464678
2011-May-24 07:38:18
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464679
2011-May-24 06:50:12
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464680
2011-May-24 06:50:12
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464681
2011-May-24 06:50:12
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464682
2011-May-24 06:50:12
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464683
2011-May-24 06:50:10
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464684
2011-May-24 06:50:10
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464685
2011-May-24 06:50:10
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464686
2011-May-24 06:50:10
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464687
2011-May-24 06:14:42
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464688
2011-May-24 06:14:42
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464689
2011-May-24 06:14:42
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464690
2011-May-24 06:14:42
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464691
2011-May-24 06:14:41
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464692
2011-May-24 06:14:41
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464693
2011-May-24 06:14:41
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464694
2011-May-24 06:14:41
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464695
2011-May-24 06:00:52
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464696
2011-May-24 06:00:52
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464697
2011-May-24 06:00:52
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464698
2011-May-24 06:00:52
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464699
2011-May-24 06:00:51
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464700
2011-May-24 06:00:51
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464701
2011-May-24 06:00:51
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464702
2011-May-24 06:00:51
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464703
2011-May-24 05:48:34
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464704
2011-May-24 05:48:34
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464705
2011-May-24 05:48:34
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464706
2011-May-24 05:48:34
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464707
2011-May-24 05:48:33
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464708
2011-May-24 05:48:33
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464709
2011-May-24 05:48:33
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464710
2011-May-24 05:48:33
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464711
2011-May-24 05:47:53
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464712
2011-May-24 05:47:53
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464713
2011-May-24 05:47:53
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464714
2011-May-24 05:47:53
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464715
2011-May-24 05:47:52
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464716
2011-May-24 05:47:52
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464717
2011-May-24 05:47:52
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464718
2011-May-24 05:47:52
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464719
2011-May-24 04:31:27
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464720
2011-May-24 04:31:27
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464721
2011-May-24 04:31:27
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464722
2011-May-24 04:31:27
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464723
2011-May-24 04:31:25
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464724
2011-May-24 04:31:25
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464725
2011-May-24 04:31:25
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464726
2011-May-24 04:31:25
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464727
2011-May-24 03:24:27
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464728
2011-May-24 03:24:27
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464729
2011-May-24 03:24:27
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464730
2011-May-24 03:24:27
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464731
2011-May-24 03:24:26
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464732
2011-May-24 03:24:26
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464733
2011-May-24 03:24:26
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464734
2011-May-24 03:24:26
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464735
2011-May-24 03:16:19
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464736
2011-May-24 03:16:19
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464737
2011-May-24 03:16:19
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464738
2011-May-24 03:16:19
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464739
2011-May-24 03:16:18
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464740
2011-May-24 03:16:18
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464741
2011-May-24 03:16:18
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464742
2011-May-24 03:16:18
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464743
2011-May-24 03:11:57
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464744
2011-May-24 03:11:57
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464745
2011-May-24 03:11:57
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464746
2011-May-24 03:11:57
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464747
2011-May-24 03:11:55
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464748
2011-May-24 03:11:55
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464749
2011-May-24 03:11:55
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464750
2011-May-24 03:11:55
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464751
2011-May-24 02:52:39
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464752
2011-May-24 02:52:39
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464753
2011-May-24 02:52:39
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464754
2011-May-24 02:52:39
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464755
2011-May-24 02:52:38
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464756
2011-May-24 02:52:38
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464757
2011-May-24 02:52:38
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464758
2011-May-24 02:52:38
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464759
2011-May-24 01:29:23
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464760
2011-May-24 01:29:22
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464761
2011-May-24 01:29:22
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464762
2011-May-24 01:29:22
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464763
2011-May-24 01:29:21
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464764
2011-May-24 01:29:21
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464765
2011-May-24 01:29:21
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464766
2011-May-24 01:29:21
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464767
2011-May-24 00:41:14
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464768
2011-May-24 00:41:14
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464769
2011-May-24 00:41:14
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464770
2011-May-24 00:41:14
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464771
2011-May-24 00:41:12
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464772
2011-May-24 00:41:12
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464773
2011-May-24 00:41:12
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464774
2011-May-24 00:41:12
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464775
2011-May-24 00:14:15
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464776
2011-May-24 00:14:15
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464777
2011-May-24 00:14:15
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464778
2011-May-24 00:14:15
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464779
2011-May-24 00:14:14
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464780
2011-May-24 00:14:14
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464781
2011-May-24 00:14:14
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464782
2011-May-24 00:14:14
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464783
2011-May-24 00:13:57
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464784
2011-May-24 00:13:57
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464785
2011-May-24 00:13:57
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464786
2011-May-24 00:13:57
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Blocking
2147464787
2011-May-24 00:13:56
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 1: STP status Forwarding
2147464788
2011-May-24 00:13:56
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e8 of instance 0: STP status Forwarding
2147464789
2011-May-24 00:13:56
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 1: STP status Blocking
2147464790
2011-May-24 00:13:56
Warning
%STP-W-PORTSTATUS: e7 of instance 0: STP status BlockingThe best way to get this resolved is to open a case with the Support Center and reference this thread. We would need to have a look at your configs to determine the issue. One thing that would likely work is for you to assign a different STP priority on each switch for each STP group.You can open a case by calling the following:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html
Ivor -
REP MSTP Compatibility mode on Cisco 4500 ????
Hi all.
I having issue when deploy REP bethween Cisco 4500 Sup 7E/6LE with ASR 9000.
Follow the guide http://www.2mul.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4.0/lxvpn/configuration/guide/lesc40book.pdf , page 319 then ASR 9000 work at REP Access Gateway is supported when the access device (cisco 4500) interfaces that connect to the gateway devices are configured with REP MSTP Compatibility mode.
How to config REP MSTP Compatibility mode on interface of Cisco 4500 ??????????
How to config REP Access Gateway on ASR 9000 ???????????
Please help!
Thanks.Tran,
you can configure REP-AG on the A9k as follows:
spanning-tree repag
int g0/0/0/0.1
int g0/0/0/0.1 l2trans
encap untagged
Note that REP-AG is not full rep, we only trigger on the TCN from the rep ring and invoke a mac flush then.
Because the 9k needs to be at the head of the ring you need to configure the following on your peer:
rep edge no-neighbor
and the compatibility mode is done via:
rep stcn stp
Finally, if the 2 endpoints of the rep ring are on the same device, you may want to put the encap untagged EFP's into an XCON or BD, if the 9k's are remote a PW to make sure that you can transport the TCN's from one ring point to the other if need be in specific design scenarios.
xander
sr Tech Lead ASR9000
CCIE -
Hi,
I have a network as shown below. Where, Sw1 is running R-PVST and other switches Sw2,Sw3&Sw4 are aunning MSTP. Sw2 is the IST and CIST root.
The issue is, whenever I try to ping from Sw1 to the switches running MSTP, I can't ping without allowing VLAN 1 on Sw1's trunk port. Am I missing something here? Or, i'm lacking concept behind compatibility of RSTP & MSTP?
Additional info: NATIVE VLAN IS 1
MANAGEMENT VLAN IS 300
Here, Management VLAN is allowed on the trunks but not VLAN 1.
Sw1----Sw2-----Sw3
Sw4
Thanks!With MST communicates with other regions(other than its own locally configured region), PVST+ regionns, or RSTP region, on VLAN1 using Native VLAN1 (Common Spanning Tree). This is because on the BPDU sent from MST, it includes a hash of the vlan-to-instance mapping table for each instance configured, whihc is included in its own M-record on this BPDU using VLAN 1.
I'm not sure about a Root Inconsistent mode though.
Now, Cisco will send out "two" BPDUs on native VLAN1. One on(0180.c200.0000 IEEE Standard BPDU), and one on (0100.0ccc.cccd Cisco Proprietary PVST+ BPD). But this only happens on trunk ports (802.1q). If this is an access port it will always use IEEE standard BPDU (0180.c200.0000).
So if you have multiple vlans, for instance, vlan 10, vlan 20, the MST switch will not undestand these BPDUs, since by Cisco switches ALWAYS send out BPDUs for all vlans other than vlan1 (as 0100.0ccc.cccd Cisco PVST+ BPDU).
Now, there is backward compatibility between these two.
I know that if a MST switch is connected to PVST+, the MST port that is connected to the PVST+ switch will detect this, and after a few seconds around 4 I think ( could be wrong ) If it detects a PVST+ BPDU it will turn the port from MST to PVST+ mode. -
On a trial basis when we migrated from Rapid PVST+ to MSTP in a network of Cisco 3560G switches, we observed that all the link (FastEthernet) cost which by default is 19 have been increased to 200000. Any idea on what basis this link costs is calculated? Do MSTP use some different formula for link cost calculation.
Can anybody suggest any good MSTP migration guide?
Thanks in advance.Hi! Francois,
Sorry for disturbing you once again. I was simulating the MSTP environment in my Lab ... I observed that whenever I map any new vlan to any existing instance the switch stops all communication in all vlans for few seconds. On debug I observed that all the instances are getting deleted and getting re-created. And by that process all the ports are going into disabled state. Is it becoz .... by adding additional vlan to an instance I am actually creating a separate MST region for this switch alone? But even then I am not able to understand what is the need for deleting all the instances?
I am attaching the log with this message, pls refer to the same.
Will be waiting for your comment.
Anybody else faced similar issue? Any related comments are appreciated.
SW-1(config-mst)#instance 2 vlan 15
SW-1(config-mst)#exit
SW-1(config)#
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MSTP(2): Fa0/11 State change forwarding -> disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MSTP(2): Fa0/13 State change forwarding -> disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MSTP(2): Fa0/21 State change forwarding -> disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MSTP(2): Fa0/23 State change forwarding -> disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MSTP(2): Fa0/24 State change forwarding -> disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MST(2): disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MST[2] Instance deleted
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MSTP(1): Fa0/21 State change forwarding -> disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MSTP(1): Fa0/23 State change forwarding -> disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MSTP(1): Fa0/24 State change forwarding -> disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MST(1): disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MST[1] Instance deleted
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MSTP(0): Fa0/11 State change forwarding -> disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MSTP(0): Fa0/13 State change forwarding -> disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MSTP(0): Fa0/21 State change forwarding -> disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MSTP(0): Fa0/23 State change forwarding -> disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MSTP(0): Fa0/24 State change forwarding -> disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MST(0): disabled
Jun 8 14:02:30.274 UTC: MST[0] Instance deleted
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MST(0): Initialization
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MST(1): Initialization
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MSTP: created IST port for 2307590
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MSTP(0): Fa0/21 State change disabled -> blocking
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MSTP(1): Fa0/21 State change disabled -> blocking
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MSTP: created IST port for 230A860
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MSTP(0): Fa0/23 State change disabled -> blocking
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MSTP(1): Fa0/23 State change disabled -> blocking
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MSTP: created IST port for 230C1C8
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MSTP(0): Fa0/24 State change disabled -> blocking
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MSTP(1): Fa0/24 State change disabled -> blocking
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MST(2): Initialization
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MSTP(2): Fa0/21 State change disabled -> blocking
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MSTP(2): Fa0/23 State change disabled -> blocking
Jun 8 14:02:31.280 UTC: MSTP(2): Fa0/24 State change disabled -> blocking
Jun 8 14:02:31.297 UTC: MSTP: created IST port for 22F7550
Jun 8 14:02:31.297 UTC: MSTP(0): Fa0/11 State change disabled -> blocking
Jun 8 14:02:31.297 UTC: MSTP(0): Fa0/11 State change blocking -> forwarding
Jun 8 14:02:31.297 UTC: MSTP(2): Fa0/11 State change disabled -> blocking
Jun 8 14:02:31.297 UTC: MSTP(2): Fa0/11 State change blocking -> forwarding
Jun 8 14:02:31.297 UTC: MSTP: created IST port for 22FA820
Thanks & Regards,
Jyotirmay. -
New DVR Issues (First Run, Channel Switching, etc.)
I've spent the last 30 minutes trying to find answers through the search with no luck, so sorry if I missed something.
I recently switched to FIOS from RCN cable in New York. I've gone through trying to setup my DVR and am running into issues and was hoping for some answers.
1. I setup two programs to record at 8PM, I was watching another channel at the time and only half paying attention. Around 8:02 I noticed a message had popped up asking if I would like to switch channels to start recording. I was expecting it to force it to switch like my old DVR, but in this case it didn't switch and I missed the first two minutes of one of the shows. I typically leave my DVR on all day and just turn off the TV, this dual show handling will cause issues with that if I forget to turn off the DVR. Is there a setting I can change that will force the DVR to choose one of the recording channels?
2. I setup all my recordings for "First Run" because I only want to see the new episodes. One show I setup was The Daily Show on comedy central, which is shown weeknights at 11pm and repeated 3-4 times throughout the day. My scheduled recordings is showing all these as planned recordings even though only the 11pm show is really "new". Most of the shows I've setup are once a week so they aren't a problem, but this seems like it will quickly fill my DVR. Any fixes?
Thanks for the help.
Solved!
Go to Solution.I came from RCN about a year ago. Fios is different in several ways, not all of them desirable. Here are several ways to get--and fix--unwanted recordings from a series recording setup.
Some general principles.
Saving changes. When you originally create a series with options, or if you go back to edit the options for an existing series, You MUST save the Series Options changes. Pretty much everywhere else in the user interface, when you change an option, the change takes effect immediately--but not in Series Options. Look at the Series Options window. Look at the far right side. There is a vertical "Save" bar, which you must navigate to and click OK on to actually save your changes. Exiting the Series Options window without having first saved your changes loses all your attempted changes--immediately.
Default Series Options. This is accessed from [Menu]--DVR--Settings--Default Series Options. This will bring up the series options that will automatically be applied to the creation of a NEW series. The options for every previously created series will not be affected by a subsequent modification of the Default Series Options. You should set these options to the way you would like them to be for the majority of series recordings that you are likely to create. Be sure to SAVE your changes. This is what you will get when you select "Create Series Recording" from the Guide. When creating a new series recording where you think that you may want options different from the default, select "Create Series with Options" instead. Series Options can always be changed for any individual series set up later--but not for all series at once.
Non-series recordings. With Fios you have no directly available options for these. With RCN and most other DVRs, you can change the start and end times for individual episodes, including individual episodes that are also in a series. With Fios, your workarounds are to create a series with options for a single program, then delete the series later; change the series options if the program is already in a series, then undo the changes you made to the series options later; or schedule recordings of the preceding and/or following shows as needed.
And now, to the unwanted repeats.
First, make sure your series options for the specific series in question--and not just the series default options--include "First Run Only". If not, fix that and SAVE. Then check you results by viewing the current options using the Series Manager app under the DVR menu.
Second, and most annoying, the Guide can have repeat programs on your channel tagged as "New". It happens. Set the series option "Air Time" to "Selected Time". To make this work correctly, you must have set up the original series recording after selecting the program in the Guide at the exact time of a first run showing (11pm, in your case), and not on a repeat entry in the Guide. Then, even it The Daily Show is tagged as New for repeat showings, these will be ignored.
Third, another channel may air reruns of the program in your series recording, and the first showing of a rerun episode on the other channel may be tagged as "New". These can be ignored in your series if you set the series option "Channel" to "Selected Channel". Related to this, if there is both an SD and HD channel broadcasting you series program, you will record them both if the series option "Duplicates" is set to "Yes". However, when the Channel option is set to "Selected Channel", the Duplicates Option is always effectively "No", regardless of what shows up on the options screen.
As for you missing two minutes, I have sereral instances in which two programs start recording at the same time. To the best of my recollection, whenever the warning message has appeared, ignoring it has not caused a loss of recording time. You might have an older software version. Newest is v.1.8. Look at Menu--Settings--System Info. Or, I might not have noticed the loss of minutes. I regularly see up to a minute of previous programming at the start of a recording, or a few missing seconds at the beginning or end of a recording. There are a lot of possibilities for that, but the DVR clock being incorrect is not one of them. With RCN, the DVR clocks occasionally drifted off by as much as a minute and a half. -
Pension issue Mid Month Leaving
Dear All,
As per rule sustem should deduct mid month joining/leaving/absences or transfer scenarios, the Pension/PF Basis will be correspondingly prorated. But our system is not doing this. In RT table i have found 3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010 0.00 6,500.00.
Employee leaving date is 14.04.2010. system is picking pension amout as 541. Last year it was coming right.
Please suggest.
AshwaniDear Jayanti,
We required prorata basis pension in case of left employees and system is not doing this. This is the issue. As per our PF experts Pension amount should come on prorata basis for left employees in case they left mid of month.System is doing prorata basis last year but from this year it is deducting 541. I am giving two RT cases of different years.
RT table for year 2010. DOL 26.04.2010
/111 EPF Basis 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/139 VPF Basis 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/3F1 Ee PF contribution 01/2010 0.00 1,050.00
/3F3 Er PF contribution 01/2010 0.00 509.00
/3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 01/2010 0.00 1,050.00
/3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 01/2010 0.00 12,600.00
/3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 01/2010 0.00 96.25
/3FA PF basis for Ee contri 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010 0.00 6,500.00
/3F4 Er Pension contributio 01/2010 0.00 541.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010 0.00 6,500.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010 0.00 6,500.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010 0.00 6,500.00
/3R3 Metro HRA Basis Amount 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
1BAS Basic Salary 01/2010 0.00 8,750.00
RT table for year 2009. DOL 27.10.2009
/111 EPF Basis 07/2009 0.00 9,016.13
/139 VPF Basis 07/2009 0.00 9,016.13
/3F1 Ee PF contribution 07/2009 0.00 1,082.00
/3F3 Er PF contribution 07/2009 0.00 628.00
/3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 07/2009 0.00 1,082.00
/3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 07/2009 0.00 8,822.00
/3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 07/2009 0.00 99.18
/3FA PF basis for Ee contri 07/2009 0.00 9,016.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009 0.00 9,016.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009 0.00 9,016.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009 0.00 5,452.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009 0.00 9,016.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 07/2009 0.00 5,452.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009 0.00 9,016.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009 0.00 5,452.00
/3R4 Non-metro HRA Basis Am 07/2009 0.00 9,016.13
1BAS Basic Salary 07/2009 0.00 9,016.13
Now please suggest what to do. where is the problem ? If have also checked EXIT_HINCALC0_002 but nothing written in it.
With Regards
Ashwani -
Open PO Analysis - BW report issue
Hello Friends
I constructed a query in BW in order to show Open Purchase Orders. We have custom DSO populated with standard
datasource 2lis_02_itm (Purcahse Order Item). In this DSO we mapped the field ELIKZ to the infoobject 0COMP_DEL
(Delivery completed).
We loaded the data from ECC system for all POs and found the following issue for Stock Transport Purchase orders (DocType = UB).
We have a PO with 4 line items. For line items 10 and 20, Goods issued, Goods received and both the flags "Delivery
complete" and "Final delivery" checked. For line items 30 and 40, only delivery indicator note is issued for zero
quantity and Delivery complete flag is checked (Final delivery flag is not checked) in ECC system. For this PO, the
delivery completion indicator is not properly updated in the DSO for line items 30 and 40. The data looks like the
following:
DOC_NUM DOC_ITEM DOCTYPE COMP_DEL
650000001 10 UB X
650000001 20 UB X
650000001 30 UB
650000001 40 UB
When we run the Open PO analysis report on BW side this PO is appearing in the report but the same is closed in ECC
system.
Any help is appreciated in this regard.
Thanks and Regards
sampathHi Priya and Reddy
Thanks for your response.
Yes the indicator is checked in EKPO table for items 30 and 40 and delta is running regularly for more than 1 year and no issues with other POs. This is happening only for few POs of type Stock Transport (UB).
I already checked the changes in ME23N and the Delivery completed indicator was changed and it reflected in EKPO table. Further, i checked the PSA records for this PO and i am getting the records with the Delivery completed flag but when i update from PSA to DSO the delivery completed indicator is not updating properly.
In PSA, for item 30 i have the following entries. Record number 42 is capturing the value X for ELIKZ but after that i am getting two more records 43 and 44 with process key 10 and without X for ELIKZ. I think this is causing the problem.
Record No. Doc.No. Item Processkey Rocancel Elikz
41 6500000001 30 11 X ---
42 6500000001 30 11 --- X
43 6500000001 30 10 X ---
44 6500000001 30 10 --- ---
(Here --- means blank)
Thanks and Regards
sampath -
HP LaserJet Enterprise 600 M602 driver issue
Hello,
I've got issue with 600-series printers. We use the latest UPD drivrer ver. 61.175.1.18849 and print from XenApp 6.5. The error occurs every time when users try to print jpg files from XenApp session. It only happens with 600 series printers and UPD.
Also I've tried to assign native 600-series driver ver. 6.3.9600.16384 and it works good. But with that driver system says that it's color printer and it brokes our printing reports. These reports are very important for us. So we can't use printer and that driver as well.
Printer installed on Windows Server 2012 R2. All clients are Windows 7 x64. XenApp Servers are Server 2008R2.
Is it possible to get fixed UPD driver or correct native driver for Server 2012 R2?
Regards,
AnatolyI am sorry, but to get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since this is a commercial printer. You can do this at Printers - LaserJet.
Click on New Post.
I hope this helps.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Gemini02
I work on behalf of HP -
Windows 7 displays error message when exiting +cursor issue
Two issues here. CS5 Phoshop on Wind 7 64 bit.
Physical processor count: 8
Processor speed: 3073 MHz
Built-in memory: 12279 MB
Free memory: 9577 MB
Memory available to Photoshop: 10934 MB
Memory used by Photoshop: 80 %
Image tile size: 128K
First issue is since the latest automatic Adobe update (why fix what isn't broken?) Every time I now exit Photoshop I get the message "Adobe QT Server has stoped working" and occasionally it happens when I exit bridge. Indesign is also behaving badly. I can no longer start a previous document from file manager without ID crashing out.
The other is the cursors in Clone and erase lose their edge (become invisable) for no reason - well not quite. Noise Ninja crashed Photoshop when I tried to use it. I reinstalled it and all is well. The cursor issue seems to be intermittant but came back (for no reason) after I reinstalled NN. I can't seem to change the cursor, no matter what I do. The problem is now seriously affecting how I work. Almost enough to go back to Win XP which ran CS5 Photoshop flawlessly.
Any help will be gratefully accepted.
Dougfunction(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
doug87510 wrote:
The recent problem is the entire outline of the cursor (including the crosshair in the middle) was missing at any size of cursor. All I had was exactly what I'd get if I used a real spraygun.
Well, that issue is simply a matter of hitting the Caps Lock key. When Caps Lock is on, you'll see the cursor outline, and when it is off you'll see a crosshair. That's a feature, not a bug.
Glad to hear the 11.1 drivers are out. I will download them and try them now myself.
Regarding "Adobe QT" crashing... QT brings to mind QuickTime, though that is Apple, not Adobe. Do you have Apple QuickTime installed?
Regarding memory usage, with 12 GB of installed RAM, you should be able to set Photoshop to use 90% or more in Edit - Preferences - Performance.
-Noel -
Issue in Creation of Periodicals for Contracts in CRM7.0
Hello,
I have a requirement to create Contracts in CRM7.0 system.
And I am doing this using the BAPI *BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI*
Good part is Contract Order gets created, but onlywith Header Details.
The issues i am facing --
1. I need to know what kind/type of data must be passed to the interface parameters, the F1 Help/Documentation is vague.
2. I am passing data in the INPUT FIELDS structure with the Object ID, Handle Number, Reference GUID and Fieldname,
here what does 'Logical Key' field indicate? What should be passed here.
What does 'REFERENCE KIND' field indicate, i have been passng 'A' for everything (to be frank i dont know whats its significance is!!).
3. With so much, My Order gets created but with less than half details, i.e. the Objects not getting created are - Partner, Product, terms/appointments, Status, LongTexts......
Any help/inputs would be appreciated.
Hope my problem is stated clearly ...
--Regards
DedeepyaHi Anu,
i found my solution by debugging with existing data or while creating it in CRMD_ORDER.
Ensure that you are passing a correct entry in INPUT_FIELDS structure.
As i haven't worked on rebates i woudlnt be able to help you, I suggest you debug to arrive at a solution.
You can preset your break-points at :-
1. FM - CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN
2. CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN_MULTI_OW -- Debug through the complete FM.
3. CRM_ORDER_PREPARE_MULTI_OW -- The data is set in this function module.
Regards
Dedeepya C -
Issue in creation of plant related data at receiving server using BD10
Hi all,
This is regarding Material master creation using B10.I am using MATMAS05 message type for sending data from one system to another.Data is sent and received successfully.When i go in mm03 i can see all the views created successfully accept views related to PLANT.Please guide to resolve the issue.
When i entered into Log-
1)"The field MBEW-BKLAS is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry".
2)"No material master data exists for material AB_08.04.09(30) in plant 4001".
My segemnt is as follows-
ZMATMAS05 matmas05
E1MARAM Master material general data (MARA)
Z1KLART KLART----
My extention
E1MARA1 Additional Fields for E1MARAM
E1MAKTM Master material short texts (MAKT)
E1MARCM Master material C segment (MARC)
Z1AUSPM E1AUSPMDistribution of Classification:----
My extention
E1MARC1 Additional Fields for E1MARCM
E1MARDM Master material warehouse/batch segment (MARD)
E1MFHMM Master material production resource/tool (MFHM)
E1MPGDM Master material product group
E1MPOPM Master material forecast parameter
E1MPRWM Master material forecast value
E1MVEGM Master material total consumption
E1MVEUM Master material unplanned consumption
E1MKALM Master material production version
E1MARMM Master material units of measure (MARM)
E1MBEWM Master material material valuation (MBEW)
E1MLGNM Master material material data per warehouse number (MLGN)
E1MVKEM Master material sales data (MVKE)
E1MLANM Master material tax classification (MLAN)
E1MTXHM Master material long text header
E1CUCFG CU: Configuration data
E1UPSLINK Reference from Object to Superior UPS
Thanks.
Edited by: sanu debu on Apr 27, 2009 7:10 PMCREATE CONTROLFILE SET DATABASE "NEWDB" NORESETLOGS ARCHIVELOGAlso when you are setting a new database, the option should be RESETLOGS and not NORESETLOGS.
'D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_2_7FK0XKB8_.LOG
D:\APP\ADMINISTRATOR\ORADATA\NEWDB\DATAFILE\O1_MF_SYSTEM_7FK0SKN0_.DBFWhy underscore(_) at the end of the datafile name. Any specific reason ? -
Issue in Creation of new Value Field in CO-PA
Hi,
I have a query in CO-PA Value Field Linking.
In my Development Client,
1. Created a New Value Field (No Transport Request Generated)
2. Linked to the above to new Conditon type created in SD. (Tranport request was generated) i.e. in Flow of Actual Values->Transfer of Billing Documents->Assign Value Fields
However then i try creating a new Value Field in my Production Client it throws a message 'You have no authorization to change Fields".
Is this an issue with authorization or i need to transport the Value field too from Development to Production client.
Please Advise.
Thanks in Advance,
SafiThanks Phaneendra for the response.
The creation of Value field did not create any tranportation request. Will this too be transported if i transport the Operating Concern.
Please Advise.
Thanks,
Safi -
Dear All
I have some is my current assignment-Customer is buying some material say "A" want "B,C" as exclusive free goods
is it possible to give two free at a time in same order ?
I only know one exlusive free good can be give to one material with combination of customer ( Customer/Material)
Looking for some inputs regarding the issue.
Can you plz suggest me if there is any possiblities for BOM?
Many Thanks
Rakesh NaveenDear Rakesh,
Be informed that free goods is not currently supported in combination with material structures (e.g. product selection,
bills of material, variants with BOM explosion), see note 796926.
Determination of free goods is performed in include FV45PF0N_NATRAB_SELECTION and the check is hardcoded. You will have to modify the program to get that functionality, but be carfull that any modification won't be supported by SAP, see note 170183.
I hope it can help you.
Ruy Castro -
Issue in creation of control cycle
Dear Gurus,
During creation of control cycle (LPK1), the fields for source information is not appearing in my system.
I compared control cycle in a different ECC system where source information is appearing.
How can make the screen appear in my ECC system.
Please find the screenshots.
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
This thread is further to the threads in Production Planning and LE/WM Forum. I could not resolve the issue with the threads.
Hope that I will get any pointer in EWM forum.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3609441
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3610822
With Regards,
MalayHello Malay,
Can first contact your ABAPer and ensure the bottom screen is not an Screen Enhancement?
If it is a some custom development, your ABAPer can help you on the logic behind it.
Else, Let us know.
Regards,
Sathish
Maybe you are looking for
-
Post Author: f'lar CA Forum: Crystal Reports I work for a medical billing company. We take reports from our clients, import them into our system, and then bill insurance or patient as appropriate. I'm a programmer who is responsible for writing rou
-
Problem with downloading Firebox 3.6
I have tried to download but it takes a very long time - over 15 minutes. It just keeps looking like it is downloading and connecting to the server. How long should it take? I have MacBook with OS x version 10.6
-
I can't delete the email on my iCloud advanced setting
Help I can't get rid of the advanced email in my iCloud account on my iPhone 5s, my mail keeps appearing on my daughters iPhone 4. How do I delete it? It's becoming very frustrating... Please could someone help me? Thank You
-
Help Regarding Adobe document services
Hello, I want to add digital signature in form 16 .for implementing that i need to have Adobe document services . my query is whether we need to have license from SAP to install ADS. how to install ADS in my system . How should i proceed ? Regards, R
-
I have an HP Deskjet D1520 printer. It prints colors much darker than what I see on the screen. For example, when I have chosen the standard bright blue found in most programs I get a deep navy blue on the printed sheet. I am using the recommended HP