MTA msg:MSLOCAL: Less than 1 kBytes of disk space available

I just started seeing these a few days ago and I know for a fact there is a huge amount of disk space on the server hosting the MTA, so I am not sure why these messages are appearing:
<01/25/12 04:11:51> DIS: MSLOCAL: Less than 1 kBytes of disk space available
<01/25/12 04:51:51> DIS: MSLOCAL: More than 1 kBytes of disk space available
The messages have show up a handfull of times since 1/20. Could not find anything on other forums, or in the KB. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance!

This is the amount of LOG space configure for the POA ( see Console One --> POA Object --> logging configuration. ) You get this message when it exceeds the limit you specify and it has to clean up old logs to make room.... hence the "Less Than 1 KB" ( I deleted stuff ) "More Than 1 KB" pattern. You may just just started to exceed the size limit, and previously were just riding on the log file aging alone which would clean out old logs. You can up the limit if you want to ensure N-days of retained logs.
-- Bob

Similar Messages

I am trying to use boot camp but it keeps saying i have less than 10 gbs of free space when i have 20, How do i fix this?

My computer shows i have 24 gigs(image 1)but, it wont let me do the boot camp because it says i hve less than 10(image 2).

buy a bigger hard drive.
you can't take away so much from Mac volume as to leave it with less than 20%/20GB and have a functional OS.
And you can't install Windows 7 with just 24GB.
you can't use free space that is fragmented and not contiguous.
you would have to get a larger SSD - OWC Macsales has SSD for the Air - or off load as much as possible to free up an add'l 40GB, at a minimum.
SSDs need free space of their own to function and allow for degradation, provisioning, garbage collection.
You have what OX Lion needs, maybe, but none to spare for another OS.
You might be able to run Windows in a VM like VirtualBox or Parallels and try to "get away" with it, but not natively.

User disk space available showing less than actually available on drive

Can anyone tell me why the space available to a user would be different, less than, that on the drive?
My user home folder is showing only 72Gb available, while I've actually still got some 350Gb available on the drive, which I can see in the finder by clicking on the drive. I certainly haven't manually given myself a quota or anything.
I am using encryption, file vault. And I'm using time machine.

FileVault only encrypts the Home folder. It does so by creating a sparsebundle type of disc image file. Any space available information you see is related to the sparsebundle. As your Home folder expands in space usage so will the sparsebundle. However, if you remove files from the Home folder the sparsebundle will not shrink.

Bootcamp shows less disk space available

Hi guys, I am new to Mac and bootcamp, so pls help me to explain the following issue. Tks alot.
1. http://i992.photobucket.com/albums/af50/nadung_photo/BootCamp%20errors/Screensho t2010-07-27at101043AM.png
you see that my hard disk had 500 GB with ~463G available
2. http://i992.photobucket.com/albums/af50/nadung_photo/BootCamp%20errors/Screensho t2010-07-27at100923AM.png
But in this pic, bootcamp seems to recognize less total disk space (around 35GB missing)
3. http://i992.photobucket.com/albums/af50/nadung_photo/BootCamp%20errors/Screensho t2010-07-27at61107PM.png
Even Inventory X recognize almost similar with Bootcamp (35GB go to somewhere)
I run as root user, did check the Disk Utility from installation disk (booted by CD) to have the same result - it shows I have full 500GB
My question is: what's wrong with the bootcamp? or it only recognize max 465GB only?
I am hesitate to install the win yet afraid that more GB will be missing. pls help me explain the reason.
Many thanks.

Hi nadung,
The OSX Disk Utility shows your 500GB harddisk with 499,93GB -> correct.
The BootCamp Assistant showing 460GB (rounded down) might be due to the 'awaited use of Windows'...
Why Disk Inventory X is showing the 'wrong' size, I don't know. Might be a question for the developer of it.
The 'loss' of 35GB is about 7% of the full 500GB of the harddisk.
If you have a look at the comparison chart in here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte that is nearly exact the amount to be expected.
Fact is there is no real-life loss since not only the harddisk size is lower in Windows than in OSX but the size of the files and folders is lower by the same rate.
So nothings lost and nothings gained. Just one more confusion...
Stefan

Today, I randomly happened to have less than 1GB of hard drive space left. I found very large "frame" files, what are they?

I found very large "frame" files, what are they & can I delete them? (See screenshot). I'm a (17 today)-year-old film-maker and can't edit in FCP X anymore because I "don't have enough space". Every time I try to delete one, another identical file creates itself...
If that can help: I just upgraded to FCP 10.0.4 and every time I launch it it asks to convert my current projects (I know it would do it at least once) and I accept, but everytime I have to get it done AGAIN. My computer is slower than ever and I have a deadline this friday
I also just upgraded to Mac OS X 10.7.4, and the problem hasn't been here for long, so it may be linked...
Please help me!
Alex

The first thing you should do is to back up your personal data. It is possible that your hard drive is failing. If you are using Time Machine, that part is already done.
Then, I think it would be easiest to reformat the drive and restore. If you ARE using Time Machine, you can start up from your Leopard installation disc. At the first Installer screen, go up to the menu bar, and from the Utilities menu, first select to run Disk Utility. Completely erase the internal drive using the Erase tab; make sure you have the internal DRIVE (not the volume) selected in the sidebar, and make sure you are NOT erasing your Time Machine drive by mistake. After erasing, quit Disk Utility, and select the command to restore from backup from the same Utilities menu. Using that Time Machine volume restore utility, you can restore it to a time and date immediately before you went on vacation, when things were working.
If you are not using Time Machine, you can erase and reinstall the OS (after you have backed up your personal data). After restarting from the new installation and installing all the updates using Software Update, you can restore your personal data from the backup you just made.

I have a new 16g nano and I have only added about 600 songs and I only have less than a gig left of space. It says I have used over 9G of other. I have no movies, pictures, tv shows or anything else on it. How do I find out what the "other" is?

I have a new 16g nano. I have only added about 600 songs so far. It is telling me that I 4.47G of songs and 9.92G of other and only 3.297MB of space left. I have no tvshows, no movies, no pictures on the Ipod. How do I find out what the "other" is and get rid of it?

You most likely have some corrupted files in other. Restore it and resync.

Getting error message stating lack of disc space, but have only used less than 1GB of 20GB idisc space and been publishing fine until this month

Why can't I send and email and get an answer to a problem that is clearly personal to my idisc. What is the point of paying for Apple Care when you can't contact them when they stop access to products that you have already paid for. I am travelling and I cannot contact them by phone.

Try the following:
close iWeb.
delete the iWeb preference file, com.apple.iWeb.plist, that resides in your Home/Library/Preferences folder.
go to your Home/Library/Caches/com.apple.iWeb folder and delete its contents.
launch iWeb and try again.
If that doesn't help continue with:
move the domain file from your Home/Library/Application Support/iWeb folder to the Desktop.
launch iWeb, create a new test site, save the new domain file and close iWeb.
go to the your Home/Library/Application Support/iWeb folder and delete the new domain file.
move your original domain file from the Desktop to the iWeb folder.
launch iWeb and try again.
OT

Oracle taking 3 times more disk spaces than MySQL for BLOBs?

Hello there,
We have been migrating one big about 8 TB MySQL table into Oracle 11g R2. The table contains biometric data in 18 BLOB columns - it's a kind of storage table for all biometric information in the form of BLOB. The avg. row length is about 140KB. We had a rough estimation - it might take about 12 TB of disk spaces after migrating the thing into Oracle. We planned to put this table in a 32K bock size tablespace. The table contains about 85 million records.
After we finished loading the data, we discovered that about 20 millions of records already consumed more than 7 TB of disk spaces! In this fashion, we might end up with consuming 30TB of disk spaces after loading the 85 million of records. The only thing at this moment I am thinking about is to reduce the PCTFREE parameter to 2% instead of 10% - the records will be very rarely updated. This will save about 2TB of disk spaces from that 30TB, I guess.
On top of your head, do you have any quick thoughts about the possible reasons of such abnormal (?) disk consumption - it is taking about 3 times more disk than MySQL database. What would be the best way to debug the problem - where to look at?
FYI- All the storage parameters of the table has been kept default - just mentioned the tablespace name while created the table. We have been using SQL*Loader with DIRECT mode to load the data.
Thanks for your cooperation!
Regards.

Hi,
We are using the old BLOB - and not compressed yet.
The machine is not remotely accessible, I will get the DDL later on.
FYI, we did not mention any storage option for the table except the tablespace name. Earlier, I looked at the dba_lobs, dba_segments, dba_extents and had the following few information -
* All the blob columns has "initial_extent" 163840 [from dba_segments]
* Block allocation gradually increased, not uniform (extent_id 1 -> blocks 2, ... extent_id 14 -> blocks 32... extent_id 77 -> blocks 256... extent_id 938 -> blocks 2048 [from dba_extents]
* CHUNK is 32768 for all lob segments
* RETENTION is 900
* No value for PCTVERSION
Thanks for your time!

MIRO(Invoice Verification) posting date is lesser than MIGO(Goods Receipt)

MIRO(Invoice Verification) posting date is lesser than MIGO(Goods Receipt) posting date.
Explanation:
Miro sholud be posted after the GRN has posted. It means that the Posting date of Miro should be greater than or equal to the Posting date of Migo. But I am facing the issue that I can able to post the Miro before the Migo date..
For example: I have posted the Migo(Goods receipt) document with the posting date u2013 10.8.09 and at the same time I can also able to post the Miro(Invoice Verification) posting date as u2013 5.08.09. This is should not be allowed . Kindly give me the solution. Is there any options in SAP standards to restrict this type of Postings(without using user exit).
regards
Varadharaj

Hi
you need to use BADi for this INVOICE_UPDATE
you can give logic as whil;e MIRO system will compare posting date with MIGO doc , then create a Z error msg in se91 nad assign it in that badi
take help of ABAPer, check following link
[LINK |GR date lesser than the PO date, the system should show an error message.;

Overall budget less than overall release with CJ35

Hi
When I retrun amount from Project through CJ35 system gives me following error:
"Overall budget less than overall release"
Any other steps requires before Returning Budget?
Regards
Sujit

I sense that the overall budget is distributed over a time frame of more than 1 year.
Part of the budget was released for the current year... and some of it was consumed.
Now you wish to return the surplus.
2 cases here.
Return in the project (not the cause of error msg that you are getting) and
Return from the project.
Here in second case when you do the CJ52 Transaction on the distributable budget, the system updates the returns within the project, meaning that the total budget is reduced accordingly.
Kindly refer this link below. Hope this info helps
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/86/98853478616434e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
Regards,
Pradyumna

From less than to

I have two transient attributes in a vo
From serial no and To serial no
My condition is from serial no should not be greater than to To serial no
In vo validation i have used compare operator and given from serial no less than or equal to To serial no and given a failure message
If my Fromserialno is greater than To serial no error msg fires
But when i go back and change the from serial no so that it is less than or equal to To serial no
Still my error msg fires

This VO is not based on a EO
Its a VO in which i have added all transient attributes
While creating VO .. the third option which is rows populated programatically, not based on query .. i have chosen that option
After the VO is created with attributes double click on any attribute you will find validation
There by click new you can add your validation just like you do at EO level
https://picasaweb.google.com/107879419245098414715/Jun202011?authkey=Gv1sRgCIvlw5LFxrmF0QE#5620272157254971970

ESS Information errors if end date is less than system date

Hi to all,
I have create an WD Java aplication to create new entries in infotype 0023.
First problem: At the beginning I couldn't create new entries if start date is less than system date. To solve this problem I used:
The transaction SPRO to go to Personnel Management>Employee Self Service>Service Specific Setting-->Change Default Start Date
In HRXSS_PER_BEGDA I changed BEGDA to 01.01.1900 in the DEFAULT_DATE method and i solved the first problem.
Now I need solved the second problem - we couldn't create new entries if end date is less than system date.
In this method DEFAULT_DATE I can't change ENDDA because ENDDA isn't a parameter in this method.
MOLGA (Importing)
PERNR (Importing)
INFTY (Importing)
SUBTY (Importing, optional)
BEGDA (Changing)
Can anybody helps me about this second problem?
Thank a lot for your help.

I am creating an aplication WD Java:
- This application uses a R3 Function Module HRXSS_PER_MODIFY_PNNNN
- This FM uses the method CALL METHOD xss_adapter->modify
- This Method uses IF_HRPA_PERNR_INFTY_XSS~MODIFY
- This method uses:
IF buffer_entry-container->a_pskey-endda < user_today.
    msg-msgid = 'PG'.
    msg-msgty = 'E'.
    msg-msgno = '016'.
    msg-msgv1 = 'Data valid only for past is not'(009).
    msg-msgv2 = 'allowed;'(010).
    msg-msgv3 = 'correct'(011).
    msg-msgv4 = 'end date to a date today or future date.'(012).
    CALL METHOD message_list->if_hrpa_message_handler~add_message
      EXPORTING
        message = msg
        cause   = xss_adapter_generic.
ENDIF.
How can I change the value user_today?
This value is a parameter for the method GET_INSTANCE in CL_HRPA_PERNR_INFTY_XSS, but I don't know when this method is called.
Can you help me?

Pix deleted with less than 24hrs notice

I've really always repped verizon and the motorola driods, i love my X2 as old as it is.. always tell my friends get verizon if you want a good service.
however this will no longer be the case, personally i highly discourage anyone from getting Verizon service until Verizon addresses thier customer service policies and does something different about thier pix storage.
I was given less than 24hrs notice before i recieved a cascade of msgs telling me to log into pixplace, my content was deleted.
Obviously this is an issue, "hindsight" is ALWAYS 20/20.. but fact is, the only pics i had of my son are gone, unrecoverable.
I'm not the only person this has happened to, there are many stories of the same. There are enough of them that something like this should have been resolved instead of dismissed.
Verizons customer service has really gone down the tubes, maybe thats legal's fault. Coming here to state my story and feelings has lead me to see threads that have changed my perception of verizon entirely, this saddens me as i always loved my VZ service and internet.
However, when I read stories like these soldiers being stationed elsewhere or even if people simply move, It shouldnt be such a big deal to end a contract that is in good standing. Verizon used to very much take care of its subscribers, thus, it developed a loyal customer base. However, these types of "weaselry" are going to destroy that same customer base.
It's not possible to establish trust, faith and pride in a service by claiming to be dependable and friendly, If the company chooses to hide behind ToS, and EULA's while smiling and speaking in a cheerful tone. We deserve the reputation and service that was commercially advertised without the legal fineprint.

becuse this was supposed to be safer than keeping them on my phone incase something happened to my phone, as i said before brian.. hindsight is always 20/20.. what I am addressing is the fact that they know this system is flawed but continue to use it as an inhouse default solution but can offer no inhouse support... what happened to me was cuz thier automated server vomited out its sms incorrectly, it happens... so i assume when they deleted my pix the msgs all delivered at once. resulting in my loss of data.
when a tele-comunications service offers you a service, they should be very good at tele-communications. if they store data they should have some form of archiving said data, alternate solution would have been to simply email my pics to me. the vast majority of us that have verizon service also have a default verizon email that came with the service, they could have placed the archive in it.
point being, theres a better way, and enough of thier customers have had problems with this that they should have already resolved this.. rather than dismissing it... which is what you are doing now.
make no mistakes, I'm not saying that i shouldnt have had 20 more back-ups, a dna sample, 2 hardcopies in seperate locations etc etc etc. if you read my post instead of trolling it though, you would notice it was about bad service, not just my own experience.... myself and many others have come to this crossroads with verizon, verizon doesnt fix thier end of things though. its not an isolated incident.
IF disatisfied with a service becuse of substandard service or false or misleading advertisement then a person should be able to terminate said contract just as easily as verizon would refuse you service for not paying.
can you hear me now? rofl

The initial heap size must be less than or equal to the maximum heap size.

All,
Please help!!
I have tested my Application Client Project in WSAD on my pc and it works fine.
I have 1gb RAM on my pc. When I deploy the same app on another xp pc(same as mine but 512mb RAM) I get a heap size error. Here is the exact error:
Incompatible initial and maximum heap sizes specified:
initial size: 268435456 bytes, maximum heap size: 267380736 bytes
The initial heap size must be less than or equal to the maximum heap size.
The default initial and maximum heap sizes are 4194304 and 267380736 bytes.
Usage: java [-options] class [args...]
(to execute a class)
or java -jar [-options] jarfile [args...]
(to execute a jar file)
where options include:
-cp -classpath <directories and zip/jar files separated by ;>
set search path for application classes and resources
-D<name>=<value>
set a system property
-verbose[:class|gc|jni]
enable verbose output
-version print product version
-showversion print product version and continue
-? -help print this help message
-X print help on non-standard options
Could not create the Java virtual machine.
Press any key to continue . . .
Here is the batch file that runs my app:
@echo off
SET appClientEar=C:\corp\apps\mts\jars\MTSClientEAR.ear
set JVM_ARGS=-Xms256M -Xmx256M
set CLIENT_PROPS=C:\corp\apps\mts\jars\medicalclient.properties
set APP_ARGS=
call C:\bnsf\IBM\WebSphere\AppClient\bin\launchClientBNSF.bat "%JVM_ARGS%" %appClientEar% "-CCpropfile=%CLIENT_PROPS%" %APP_ARGS%
@pause
I have changed the value of Xms and Xmx of JVM_ARGS to different size but I sitll get error. Anyone knows what the problem is. Thanks..

Don't know why, but the "maximum heap size: 267380736 bytes" value is just slightly less than 256*1024*1024, wheras the reported initial size is equal to that.
Try setting the initial value to 255MB.

How to report only quantities less than zero on a calculated field

I do not understand why my text will not work when it comes to reporting only 'Missing POs' less than zero, I assume it is because I am using 'int' on some fields?
Any advice?
SELECT
t0.father as 'Parent Code',
t2.itemname as 'Parent Description',
t2.frgnname as 'Parent Status',
t0.code as 'Child Code',
t1.itemname as 'Child Description',
t1.frgnname as 'Child Status',
t0.comment as 'Master',
cast(t3.onhand as int) as 'Child Uncommitted Stock',
cast(t3.iscommited as int) as 'Child Committed Stock',
(cast(t3.onhand as int) - cast(t3.iscommited as int)) as 'Child Free Stock',
cast(t3.onorder as int) as 'Purchase Orders',
(cast(t3.onhand as int) - cast(t3.iscommited as int)) + cast(t3.onorder as int) as 'Missing POs'
FROM
itt1 t0
inner join oitm t1 on t0.code = t1.itemcode
inner join oitm t2 on t0.father = t2.itemcode
LEFT JOIN OITW T3 ON T3.WHSCODE = T0.Warehouse AND T3.ItemCode = T0.Code
Where T3.WHSCODE Like '[%0]%' and 'Missing POs' < 0
ORDER BY
'Missing POs' asc, t0.father, t0.code
Many thanks,
Robin (I will be awarding points on all my outstanding questions shorlty - management time pressure at mo!)

Try this:
SELECT
t0.father as 'Parent Code',
t2.itemname as 'Parent Description',
t2.frgnname as 'Parent Status',
t0.code as 'Child Code',
t1.itemname as 'Child Description',
t1.frgnname as 'Child Status',
t0.comment as 'Master',
cast(t3.onhand as int) as 'Child Uncommitted Stock',
cast(t3.iscommited as int) as 'Child Committed Stock',
(cast(t3.onhand as int) - cast(t3.iscommited as int)) as 'Child Free Stock',
cast(t3.onorder as int) as 'Purchase Orders',
(cast(t3.onhand as int) - cast(t3.iscommited as int))
+ cast(t3.onorder as int) as 'Missing POs'
FROM
itt1 t0
inner join oitm t1 on t0.code = t1.itemcode
inner join oitm t2 on t0.father = t2.itemcode
LEFT JOIN OITW T3 ON T3.WHSCODE = T0.Warehouse AND T3.ItemCode = T0.Code
Where T3.WHSCODE Like '%0%' and (cast(t3.onhand as int) - cast(t3.iscommited as int))
+ cast(t3.onorder as int) < 0
ORDER BY
(cast(t3.onhand as int) - cast(t3.iscommited as int))
+ cast(t3.onorder as int),t0.father, t0.code

MTA msg:MSLOCAL: Less than 1 kBytes of disk space available

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for