MTO not considering available raw materials

Here there are some available raw materials in unrestricted use. When any new sales order is generated for MTO finished material it is generating a new purchase requisition for the same raw material ( since that raw material is not assigned to the sales order ). But here client is asking that it should consider the available raw material only when they generate any new sales order for finished product and it should not generate any new PR

Hi
For raw materials in MRP- 4 view give individual/coll field as 2 which is collective requirement. It will consider. Do it only for raw material.
Regards
Antony

Similar Messages

Is there a possibility should not consider available quantity at time of MR

Sir,
Is there a possibility should not consider available quantity at time of MRP planning?
Example:
Available stock: 100
Planning stock: 100 (MD61)
Schedule line to be generate: 100 Qty (Exclude the available quantity at time of MRP planning)
regards,
sampath

Dear Sampath/Raj,
1) Move the stock to particular storage location for which you don't want to be consider by MRP
2) Now go to OMIR t-code, input value as 1 for that particular storage location
3) Go to MMSC, input value as 1 for that particular storage location
4) Go to MRP - 4 view Down you can find field Storage location input value as 1
5) Now run MRP, system will not consider stock of that particular storage location
Regards
Madhu

Data not updating for raw materials only in cube level

HI all gurus,
we have flow like ods1->ods2->cube1,cube2 and cube3.
In ods1 we mapped ZMATERIAL WITH OMATERIAL.
In ods2 we mapped zmaterial with zmaterial directly.
In cube we mapped zmaterial with zmaterial only but also we added 0mat_type in update rules of cube. i.e.we mapped in update rules 0mat_type is master data attribute of zmaterial.
But the problem is ods2 is mapped to cube1,cub2 and cube3 parllelly.
But the data is not populating to cube2 and cube3 only for rawmaterials i.e 0mat_type is having 15 material types(finished ,semi finishe and rawmaterials) only 4 raw materials are not showing any data for these two cubes but for one cube1 it is showing data for all 15 material types. (including raw materials)
what could be the problem.
I checked the Attribute change run.
I checked the data in masterdata also zmaterial and 0material.(data is available upto date).
Please help and i will definitely assingn the points.
It's very urgent becauz total my development work is stopped.
Thanks & regards,
Kumar.

Hi,
Check the material values in cube2 and cube 3 for records not having 0mat_type and then using that material check the material master data table to confirm whether mat_type is present for those materials or not.
Also, if you have written any start routine in update rules for cube 2 and 3 then check that too.
PB

In MRP for changing MTO to MTS for raw materials

Hi guys,
I am getting one problem that i have changed for raw materials fron individual indiactor to clollective indicator to get its Purchase requistion for MTS. But in MD02 or IN MD04 it is still showing PR for individaul sales order in some cases.Can you pl.tell me why it is so.
regards

Please check the following..as Mat.master settings may be overrided as per below..
You can maintain this indicator in the following places:
In the material master record
For the explosion type of the BOM item (in Customizing for Basic Data in Define Explosion Types)
The setting for the explosion type overrides that in the material master record.
Dependencies
If the material is assigned to a material type that does not allow quantity-based inventory management in this plant, you can set the indicator to individual requirements only.
If the stock is to be managed in sales order stock or project stock, the indicator must be set to one of the following options:
Individual and collective requirements
Individual requirements only
If a material managed in project stock is to be procured from another plant using a cross-company-code stock transport order, the indicator must be set to 2 (collective requirements) in the issuing plant because, in this specific context, individual project stock management is not possible in both plants.

Availability check of alternate components / raw materials

A HALB material ( I1 ) has got four alternate raw materials ( R1, R2, R3, R4 )
The need is that when doing the material availability check of I1 when releasing production order, it must check the material availability of R1 + R2 + R3 + R4 to meet the requirement of I1.
Can the above be done in R3 ? If yes , how ?

Hi,
A quick thought:
For those materials which you consider as critical, in the scope of check for these materials OPJJ, tick only include safety stock & you might want to consider Released -> production orders, Stock transport orders & only withdrawable reqn's so this would ensure that the system considers the present stock & then only those issues which you have selected, thereby have a more realistic availability check, where as for the non-critical components, you can consider all stocks, firmed receipts etc, this rule you can assign during creation stage. But for release stage since you want to do a detailed check for all components you can assign the relevant rule as per your need.
The above would ensure that the missing list would be generated only for your critical components if the present stock does not support the new needs generated by the production order.
Hope the above helps.
Regards,
Vivek

Trying to open file in photoshop elements, only first option available in Edit Photo window. The other two has "Edit a Copy is not applicable to raw or Digital Negative files" same for Edit Original.

Brand new user to Lightroom 5. Was following tutorials and doing fine editing. After done editing NEF files, I'm trying to open them in PSE 11 to further edit. Using the "Edit Photo with Adobe Photoshop Elements Editor". But the window only has the first option available and the other two grayed out. Each of those has "...is not applicable to raw or Digital Negative files." What??

Ricardo.Amaral wrote:
What I wanted to do instead was to indeed remove that people from the photo with Photoshop but keep those changes in DNG.
sorry, no can do...ain't gonna happen.
What you've done is hit the wall on is the basic difference between lite duty spot healing and photo level tone and color correction (Lightroom and Camera Raw) and heavy duty pixel retouching in Photoshop.
When you need to substantially manipulate the "pixels" you need Photoshop and you'll be forced to render the raw file into a TIFF or PSD file either through Camera Raw or more better, via Lightroom.
You can do the basic tone and color correction directly in Lightroom and edit in Photoshop from Lightroom. But you will NEED to create and save out a "rendered" image that is no longer raw...then retouch to your heart's desire, save it and it'll be available in Lightroom along side your original raw if you choose.
But no, there's no way to open a raw in Photoshop, manipulate the heck out of it with massive retouching then save that back out as a raw file...ain't gonna happen.

MRP is not considering material availability dates for sorting customer ord

Hello Experts,
MRP is not considering material availability dates for sorting customer order/ sales order in sequence (thatu2019s is oldest from newest in order) in MD04.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Om

Om,
No. Aside from my obvious desire to preserve my privacy, it would be a disservice to the other forum members. No-one else but you and I would understand your problem, and no-one else but you would be able to benefit from any solutions.
There are dozens of free public portals suitable for posting pictures on the internet. I suggest that you use one.
Best Regards,
DB49

Few materials are not considered in MCTE,MCTG

Hi,
i done a report on Daily/monthy Sales and the results are not matching with standard SD sales reports (MCTE,MCTG etc). On analysis i found few materials which are actually billed is not considered by the Standard reports. Those materials belongs to trading materials. What could be the reason.
Suggestions are highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Aswin.

Hi
go to mm03 -> sales org 2 screen -> check if Matl statistics grp is maintained.
thanks

.AVI files not showng when RAW Only selected at import time

Hi board,
When I am looking at my SD card from my Nikon D90 in the Import view of Aperture I have the 'Raw Only' option selected for the RAW+JPEG Pairs setting. This results in .AVI files not showing up in the browser. Meaning that when I believed I was importing all my photos in RAW and my movies, my movies were actually not even considered for importing. I realize (now) that RAW Only quite litteraly means RAW Only, but why do I have to select Both when importing to get my movies? Then I would have to weed out any eventual JPEGs that I might have taken but do not want to import.
I'm simply curious why .AVI are excluded together with .JPEGs. I did not consider this to be intuitive or clear to the user (since the setting is called RAW+JPEG Pairs, not mentioning that it could possibly exclude movies).
Thanks!

Same here, with Aperture 3.2.2, OS 10.7.2
That definitely seems to be a bug to me; if either "JPEG only" or "RAW files only" is selected, the File Types selector is ignored, and no audio or video media are available in the import panel.
Regards
Léonie

MTO Strategy consider the stock in hand

Dear Experts,
AM new in MRP Field, pls advise me about pure MTO Strategy which consider stock in hand. MRP run should consider the available stock for net requirement calculation. I tried with strategy 20,but it is not consider the stock.Pls advise,
Regards,
Vijesh

Vijesh,
MTO by definition will only consider Sales order stock. This is the main planning difference between MTO and MTS. Thus, if you have generic stock on hand (not sales order specific) it is supposed to be excluded from MRP planning.
If you wish for MTO planning to consider generic stock, you have to first convert the stock to Sales Order specific stock (Special stock type 'E') using a Material Movement transaction. Or, you can stop using MTO and use an MTS strategy, such as 40.
For more info about MTO planning see http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_06/helpdata/EN/f4/7d2ed844af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Best Regards,
DB49

Collective requirement for Raw materials for the whole week during mrp ru

hi gurus,
I have a requirement like this. the raw materials required for on different requirement dates has to be clubbed together per week and one single purchase requisition for that raw material for that week. I had created a availability checking group and assigned that to check rule. then attached that in material master mrp 3 view of the material master.
If i run mrp for that product, it is not clubbing the weekly requirement instead it is clubbing only daily requirement and pr is getting generated.
can anybody give some valuable inputs so that i can proceed further?
regards,
senthil

Hi,
Try using the Lot Size: WB.
With this system wil club together all the requirements and propose a single receipt element.
Regards,
Siva

Cost Estimates - system collects planed price for some raw materials only

Hello
I have a question regarding price determination for raw materials when creating cost estimates. My costing variant uses material future price (Accounting 1 view) in raw materials as a primary source for price collecting of raw materials and I want it to be that way. But the problem is that when creating a cost estimate only some materials are recognized as raw (key symbol) while others are recognized for costing (calculator symbol), although all of them have a future price entered into material master data on the same date. For those that are recognized for costing the system uses the average moving price.
I have tried setting all the data for raw materials the same way, the costing views (do not cost, no qty structure), the accounting views are the same and I still cant find the reason why system uses one type of valuation for some and other for others.
Help?

Please check the Price Strategy sequence in the Valuation variant assinged to the Costing Variant in Tcode OKKN. The first priority in your case must be Moving avg price. So, please change it to the planned price which you want. The system will then consider this planned price for the raw material valuation.
hope this info helps you.
regards,
VS.

In house mfgd. raw materials for a production order- Cost capturing

Hello Experts,
The scenario is as below:
Client wants to manufacture in house some of the raw materials for a production order of sub assembly. These raw materials are made from scrap, with some manhours spent on it. After making them in house, these are handed over to stores for kit preparation.
The planner wants to create a stock of these materials (without making individual prod. orders since there are many of these). One option is, planner can do the cost centre issue reversal (202 movement). But the raw material cost is also getting captured in it from the material master.
From costing point of view, the cost of raw material should not be included since it is made from scrap. Only the cost of man hours spent is to be accounted for.
Please help as to how to map this scenario. For capturing cost of man hours spent, we can include a routing for it in the production order of the sub assembly. But how to eliminate or exclude the material cost. All inputs from your side are appreciated. Thanks in advance
Regards,
Chetan.

Hi Chetan,
Your scenario has some major issue.
1. You cannot produce RAW material in SAP.
2. The cost of material produced inhouse will be different than that of original RAW material.
3. There will be some cost effect in the final finished product if you consider this inhouse produced material for product costing of finished goods.
We have similar scenario with my client and here is what I have implemented.
1. Create a new HALB type part number for the inhouse manufactured RAW material. This will ensure that you assign Routing and BOM to same and can capture the COST for the same.
2. Creating new material will enure that the product costing for inhouse produced RAW material is done.
3. You can create single Production order for the same as you only have to capture cost. This depends on your Business scenario.
4. Once you have inhouse produced raw material, you can create alternate BOM for the FINISHED Material with this new Part number in BOM.
5. Create Production Version for the two BOM and ask Planner to select the Version 2 if he requires new part number in Production Order. I assume that this case would genrally appear in very small numbers.
6. Now coming to product costing for final assembly. Since we are going to reuse scrap material to create the new part number, only activity cost and component cost will be used to determine cost. This cost will be less than that of RAW material cost.
So we always suggest our customer to consider OLD part number to determine the PRODUCT COST of final material. BUT business will have to take a call on this.
Do let me know if u need any thing else.

Getting Blend materials from Raw Materials in RMWB transaction technically.

Hi,
I am working on a PDM report having requirement for determining all unit and case UPC that contain a chemical represented by a CAS.
I have a requirement for getting Blends using Raw materials.I am able to find the raw materials from pure substance but not able to get a logic for getting the Blends from this raw materials.
Is there any Function Module to find the Blends from raw materials or any logic which I can put in my program to find this.If anybody could help me in this.
Then I have to get the Finished Goods using the Blends.
And Finally Finished Goods comprised of Finished Goods.
There is no time to debug the Standard RMWB transaction.
<removed_by_moderator> .Kindly all PDM-ABAP users please help me on this issue.
Thanking you in advance.
Sudip
Edited by: Juan Reyes on Aug 14, 2009 2:49 PM

Hi Chetan,
Your scenario has some major issue.
1. You cannot produce RAW material in SAP.
2. The cost of material produced inhouse will be different than that of original RAW material.
3. There will be some cost effect in the final finished product if you consider this inhouse produced material for product costing of finished goods.
We have similar scenario with my client and here is what I have implemented.
1. Create a new HALB type part number for the inhouse manufactured RAW material. This will ensure that you assign Routing and BOM to same and can capture the COST for the same.
2. Creating new material will enure that the product costing for inhouse produced RAW material is done.
3. You can create single Production order for the same as you only have to capture cost. This depends on your Business scenario.
4. Once you have inhouse produced raw material, you can create alternate BOM for the FINISHED Material with this new Part number in BOM.
5. Create Production Version for the two BOM and ask Planner to select the Version 2 if he requires new part number in Production Order. I assume that this case would genrally appear in very small numbers.
6. Now coming to product costing for final assembly. Since we are going to reuse scrap material to create the new part number, only activity cost and component cost will be used to determine cost. This cost will be less than that of RAW material cost.
So we always suggest our customer to consider OLD part number to determine the PRODUCT COST of final material. BUT business will have to take a call on this.
Do let me know if u need any thing else.

Trans duration not consider during Preq forward scheduling

Sales order is created with Make-to-order configurable material
Variant. During the planning process, the raw material is issued from
one facility to the facility specified on the sales order using STO
process.
During CTP process (backward & reverse strategy setting,), while doing
the backward scheduling, system considers the transport duration from
the transportation lane and calculates the correct requested date for
the raw material.
If there is no capacity available to make the raw material on the
requested date system is expected to carry out forward scheduling. The
system then updates the planned order that consumes raw material correctly.
While updating the Preq the system does not consider the transport
duration from the transportation lane. The availability date on PurRqs
and the requested date on the PReqRel is same.
Has anybody seen this issue?
Kedar

Guys,
We found that the transportation time is considered in forward scheduling of a PReq when we have a transportation resource. But it is not considered when we have GR/GI time in product master or in Tlane(only the GR).
Has anybody gone through this issue?
Kedar

MTO not considering available raw materials

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for