Much faster render

I can confirm that 10.0.6 has greatly improved the render time. Render that took minutes now it takes only seconds even with heavy filter like Crumple Pops, Tone grade. Here is more about this http://www.fcp.co/final-cut-pro/news/954-10-0-6-brings-a-3200-speed-increase-whe n-rendering-effects-on-a-final-cut-pro-x-timeline

The Share Monitor doesn't interact with FCP X any longer, thank goodness, the royal PITA app.
All exports are now Background Processes. To monitor them, click the background icon in the Dashboard or use Command-9.
Yes, 10.0.6 uses the GPU for all exports now.

Similar Messages

Much faster render in 10.0.6

I can confirm that rendering is much faster than before. Even with heavy effects like Tone Grade from Crumple Pops it now only takes seconds instaed of minutes. Here is more about this http://www.fcp.co/final-cut-pro/news/954-10-0-6-brings-a-3200-speed-increase-whe n-rendering-effects-on-a-final-cut-pro-x-timeline

The Share Monitor doesn't interact with FCP X any longer, thank goodness, the royal PITA app.
All exports are now Background Processes. To monitor them, click the background icon in the Dashboard or use Command-9.
Yes, 10.0.6 uses the GPU for all exports now.

Fp11 run video rendering much faster even without stageVideo

hi adobe,
first..thank you very much that you have heard our dreams about GPU optimizing. I cant remember how many request, forms and feature requests we at onlinelib has fill out to get this feature.
anyway, the first demo works pretty amazing. i also test http segment streaming (build with fp10) with flashplayer 11 and iam wondering that it runs in fullscreen about 40-50% faster then with the latest public flash player.
i dont use the new stageVideo in this version:
http://onlinelib.de/Streaming_Solutions.html
do you render in fp11 automaticly with stageVideo when the fp detects it?
keep up the good work...
gary
http://onlinelib.de

How on earth do you manage with only 2GB of RAM? Doubling that, or better would speed up your Mac.
How much faster will the newest iMac model be (for Final Cut Pro rendering, DVD writing, etc.)?
Nobody knows except Apple. The rest of us will know when they anounce it! And of course, Final Cut Pro has been discontinued.
The age-old question: Buy soon, or wait till even better models come out?
Definitely!

Export movie is slow... but why Send to Compressor is so much faster!)

Hi,
I have a question. I had a about 60 seconds long animation to render and as usual, I just whent to Share > Export Movie and wondered how on earth it can take more than 30 minutes to render... After 20 minutes and estimate time was still rising, I just clicked cancel.
Then, for some reason I clicked Send to Compressor and suprized how much faster it rendered! Same file, same settings and same output took only 6 minutes!!! Why???

Good question... I didn't think of that. I have a bluetooth keyboard and mouse, both made by Apple. My friend has a wired keyboard and mouse, plus an external hard drive. I am using wireless internet and my router is about two feet from my computer, and my friend is using wired internet. He has DSL, I have cable. He has a printer connected, and I have one connected to my router.
I know some of those details may be irrelevant... If you need any more information, just ask.

Can Premiere Pro 5.5 be that much faster?

I have two identical PCs, purchased and set up at the same time. I'm running Premiere Pro 5.0 on one and Premiere Pro 5.5 on the other. The software preference settings are identical. The newer version smokes the older one for speed. It renders and outputs files in about a fifth of the time. I can't figure why there's so much difference. Can the newer version be that much faster?

Premiere pro CS5 has a smaller list of supported GPU's that enhance the playback and render performance.
On the other hand PRemiere pro CS5.5 has new graphic cards added to the list.
And thats the reason for knowing the computer specifications because if GPU in your computer is supported in CS5.5 but not in CS5 there would be a difference in the performance.
Any ways we would expect Premiere Pro cs5.5 to be faster, certain performance upgrades(software coding) that Adobe might have done(CONFIDENTIAL) since is is meant to supersede Premiere Pro CS5.

How much faster on an iMac?

I've been editing and burning soccer team video on my 12" PowerBook G4 (1.5G, 512 RAM). Needless to say its been painful but very successful. I've pretty much talked myself into upgrading to an iMac mainly to expedite the burning of that first DVD. How much faster can I expect to burn (render) that first DVD. Typically I'm filming about 1.5 hours of video and then burning a couple copies. That first DVD currently takes about 6 hours to burn.

Bengt Wärleby wrote:
.. But may be it would be to complex.
you see from time to time such comparison charts in printed mac magazines .. I usually ignore, me no engineer
and: it could be a nice task for a comunity, to download (=not 1h, perhaps 5min?) a 'standard' video and post everybodys result to create a 'reallife chart' .. not complex, but asking too much of .. community. ...- in my small perspective, very little people are interested in movie making (and associated topics), and most people own 'their' Mac.. what need, to know the encoding times on others? kinda academic discussion ... a pro will allways ask for 'max', and amateurs like us have other criteria for buying a Mac (size of wallet)
on my old Cube, increasing RAM beyond 1GB (under OsX) made a significant jump, and switching to Intel adds another reallife noticeable speedbump ...

If i export my project, it runs much faster than in the canvas. How can I fix that?

If i export my project, it runs much faster than in the canvas. How can I fix that?
I'm from germany, sorry for my english!

When you export your project, it is "compiled" into video format. Any player will play it at its frame rate.
Motion is a compositing application. It has to make many more times the calculations needed to animate everything and 90% of the time, it's just not possible for Motion to keep up with "real time". It's to be expected. Learning to live with that fact will make life a lot easier for you, I promise.
There are a few things you can do to help speed up Motion:
Reduce temporary play ranges to no more than about 5 seconds at a time. You can move the Play Range In and Out markers from section to section. Motion does all of its real time rendering in RAM. The longer the play range, to more it has to work managing that memory.
Remove Preview Icons from the Layers list ( View menu > Layers Columns > Preview will toggle the views)
When you play your animation, turn off on screen guides: (command - / will toggle onscreen guides)
In Motion 5, reducing the quality of playback from the Render menu does not make a lot of difference anymore, so you might as well keep the default settings of Dynamic, Full and Normal on. However, Motion Blur, Frame Blending, Field Rendering, as well as the lighting options will affect playback, sometimes by quite a lot. So if you have Lights, turning off Lighting, Shadows, and Reflections will get back a lot of real time playback speed (just remember to turn on all that you need before rendering, or these things will be left out of the export!)
HTH

How much faster are the Quad-Core Macpros?

Does anyone have any idea how much quicker a Two 3.0GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon will encode video in FCP, Compressor, and DVD SP, vs. a Two 3.0GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon?
Thanks.

in some areas motion in particular or exporting mpeg2 from fcp timeline, is slower on this 8 core than on the older dual2gig PPC. this machine has the Nvidea quadro FX4500 which one would hope is faster using motion but doesn't seem to be. that being said compressor rocks using temp Qmaster 4 instance like making 2 pass mpeg2 from a movie file, 90 min movie compressed in 40 min. photoshop and after effects rocks due to multiprocessor use and rendered timeline stuff though not always clean is much faster. having to render more than once and having to watch top to bottom from a QT export out of FCP ***** somedays. Over all it's worth it in my busy every day world

Hi Thanks for 4.0. It runs much faster on my Mac, however, it no longer works to zoom in all of my web pages. I use to be able to use my finger pad to increase the size of all of all pages. Thanks again.

Hi Thanks for 4.0. It runs much faster on my Mac, however, it no longer works to zoom in all of my web pages. I use to be able to use my finger pad to increase the size of all of all pages.
Thanks again.
PS Are you working on a version for the iPad and iPhone with Add Blocker? That would be great!

Here are some zoom add-ons which might provide a workaround:
[https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/search/?q=image+zoom&cat=all&x=0&y=0 Image Zoom]
As regards your question about iPad and iPhone, you'd be better off posting that question here: [https://forums.mozilla.org/addons/ Mozilla Add-ons Forum]
P.S. ''Apologies for not responding earlier''.

How do I scroll more than one line at a time in Firefox 4? Scrolling with down-up keyboard arrows is much faster in IE/Chrome.

I have tried using about:config options mousewheel.withnokey.sysnumlines > false and custom set mousewheel.withnokey.numlines, but it makes a difference only when I use a mouse, which I don't use most of the time on this laptop. I use down/up keyboard errors to scroll, and the page scrolls one-line-at-a-time, very slow and lagging. Is there a way around this?
I have reinstalled Chrome as secondary browser only because of this, FF4 otherwise really kicksass. Thank you for an amazing browser and any feedback on my issue.

Well I am using those, but it is not very practical. What puzzles me is that only Firefox has this behaviour, I have tried last versions of IE, Chrome, Opera - all three scroll much faster than Firefox 4 using down/up keyboard arrows.
Thanks for the reply, I really hope to get a solution to this.

It's not my imagination. iOS 6 is depleting battery life at a much faster rate

I own a black 32GB iPhone 4S. Being a fairly new apple customer ( my first smart phone 4s in feb 2012) I can't say enough about how great I feel apples products are. Top quality all the way and worthy of a higher price than any so called competitors devices. My only complaint is the addiction level that comes with these great devices. My phone is in mint condition having never left its case except for cleaning. However after updating to iOS6 my battery life is depleting much faster. Auto brightness is off with setting at half. Location services are off. Everything and all settings are set the same as always to minimize unessesary activity. Yesterday after unplugging my phone at 7am by 4:00pm it was at 1%. The last 20% was intentional to give it another complete charge which I do once a month for battery maintenance. Usage was just like any average day and I usually plug my phone in at night with anywhere between 20-56% left. This morning I unplugged it at 6am and by 8am it lost 3% with no usage. Not sure why but I'm OCD on all my electronic devices ( studio equipment included) so I am hyper aware of there operating condition. So this happening why? I have noticed a significant improvement in web page load times as well. Is this increased speed drain faster? Just a long winded observation. Hope an update can fix this.

Hotspot functionality is entirely dependent upon the carrier.
Do they support Hotspot?
Is the account properly provisioned for the feature?

For me, Firefox 4.0.1 is slooooow to download pages. IE 8 is much faster. I have Win 7 and Avast. I just uninstalled Firefox. Thanks.

For me, Firefox 4.0.1 is slooooow to download pages on all web sites. IE 8 is much, much faster. I have Win 7 and Avast. I just uninstalled Firefox. Thanks.

Did you check your security software (firewall)?
A possible cause is security software (firewall) that blocks or restricts Firefox or the plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after detecting changes (update) to the Firefox program.
Remove all rules for Firefox from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full unrestricted access to internet for Firefox and the plugin-container process.
See:
* https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Server+not+found
* https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Firewalls

My screen load times have slowed down to a crawl. I have to wait and wait for a page to load. (I know --dial -up) It used to be much faster a month ago before 5.0. Is it FireFox or do I look to Yahoo for the problem? I don't know how to sort it out.

I use dial-up, FireFox 5.0, Yahoo addition 1.8. My screen load times have slowed down to a crawl. I have to wait and wait for a page to load. (I know --dial -up) It used to be much faster a month ago before 5.0. Is it FireFox or do I look to Yahoo for the problem? I don't know how to sort it out. Using Vista

I'm having the same problem. Dreamweaver is supper slow. Uploading and downloads from the server... any server I use two different servers. It times out all the time. Menus are slow too.
I'm on a MAC Pro, 6 gigs of ram no issues with anything else. I have talked to Apple they have checked everything for me. They say it's Dreamweaver. I've noticed the Dreamweaver is talking to the FTP even when I'm not doing anything.
I've tried cleaning out my MAC caches, turning off file check and check out. Still really slow. I've worked with Dreamweaver for 6 years never any issues like this before. 18 seconds to upload a 4 kb file. 11 seconds to download the same file.

How do I get my favorites (huge) to come over the Firefox from MS? I find firefox much faster on teh web also for some reason.

How can I transfer my long list of organized favorites I have on MS Internet Explorer over to Firefox?

Hey thanks for the quick answer!! I will do the import and then should be set to go.
I am just still wondering why Firefox just seems so much faster.
Also I was having trouble accessing some stuff with my bank and kept getting messed up with MS Inet explorer. The very first thing the IT people told me to do was switch to Mozilla Firefox.
It appears that lots of new problems are coming to the surface with MS INExplorer

New Mac Pro 8-core / D700 not much faster than an iMac... in PPro CC.

So.... my very preliminary testing with our new Mac Pro using the plugin I use most (filmconvert -FC) anyway, shows that Premiere CC needs more optimization for the dual GPUs. In fact, I'd say the CPU utilization is not up to snuff either.
I know FC only uses one GPU presently from the developer. That will change. In the meantime, using a couple of typical projects with that plugin as an example, I'm only seeing 25-45% speed up in renders over our maxed out iMac (late 2012, 27") exporting the same project. That's significant of course but not the 100%+ one would think we would be seeing at the least given the MacPro config of 8 cores and dual D700s. Premiere Pro CC seems in fact to never maximize CPU (never mind GPUs). I have yet, in my very limited testing, see it "pin the meters" like I did on the iMac.
Of course that's just testing now two short (under 5 min) projects, and it depends on what one is doing. Some stuff is much, much faster like Red Giant's Denoiser II or Warp Stabilizer VFX. The improvement there can be 3-4x faster anecdotally. I used to avoid them for speed reasons unless absolutely needed a lot of the time but now they are fast enough to rely on quickly. Other stuff unrelated top PPro CC like DxO PRIME noise removal on RAW stills is much faster too, as is Photoshop CC. Some effects like blur, sharpening, resize there are nearly instant now even on giga pixel files in Photoshop CC.
And of course FCPX is much faster on it but I hate the whole editing paradigm. The timeline is just horrid on it; simple things like replacing a word in someone's dialogue is a multi click, multistep process that is nearly instant in Premiere and most every other NLE. Just to try to see your whole timeline is a chore, to see what your edits and sound are in detail are problematic, trying to keep things in sync is a chore, and you can't even zoom your timeline window to full screen! If anybody has edited for any amount of time, I do not understand how they use FCP X. If they start with that program, for example if they are young, then that is a different beast.
I'm sure Adobe will improve over time. They have to to stay competitive. In the meantime I'll take my 45%... but I wish I saw much more improvement given the cost and hardware differential. Unfortiunately, for now, the mainstream reviews I have seen regarding PPro performance on this machine were right.

That statement about 4k/5k in Premiere CC with the nMP is false, insofar as performance goes.
I just tested 5K Red raw files just dragged into Premiere Pro CC (latest version). I expected this to be slow, given my HD experience. However, on my 8 core/D700, I can play 1/2 just fine, full speed. And I even can also do that with a very streneous plugin/filter attached - FilmConvert (in OpenCL mode), also at 1/2 which is quite impressive. I can even add a bunch of other Premiere filters and SG looks and it still stays at full speed at 1/2.
Ironically, this is quite faster than FCPX which can't seem to play back 5K at all with that filter attached (it doesn't stutter, but it's not smooth... low resolution at "best performace" and reduced frame rate). Even if I remove all filters FCPX plays back Red 4k (again not transcoded) about the same as CC at 1/2, but with a seemingly lower resolution to keep it smooth. It's a head scratcher. It's like Adobe's Red handling is much better coded than Apple's in this case.
Or... it has to be attrituable to that particular plugin (other FCPX motion-based plugins don't suffer the same fate and are fast). But either way, filter or no, Premiere Pro CC is definitely and sharper looking at 1/2 when cutting Red 4k/5k with no transcode, playback in real time, than FCPX which needs to bump it down to what looks like a 1/4 or less rez to keep it smooth. So I have no idea what is going on.
This experience is the opposite with HD, where FCPX is significantly faster (using the same filters/plugin, using C300 Canon XF for HD and 4 and 5K RedRaw alternatively). Premiere seems slower in HD than FCPX by a good amount in HD and signficantly faster with Redraw 4k. Go figure.

Much faster render

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for