Multi-map without using BPM

Hello
I am trying to create a multimap without using BPM as we are on SP15. I did the respective configuration in Message and Interface mapping as mentioned in the weblog.
I am expecting multiple files to get generated in the target directory and i hope file adapter supports this.
For that I did extended interface determination where I selected the respective interface mapping.
When I am trying to execute this interface it throws error in SXMB_MONI saying "No messages created from split mapping".
One more doubt, with what names it will generate multiple files?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Rajeev

Hello
I tested my mappings in the Test tab of Interface Mapping where it runs absolutely fine.
Here is source and target messages
***************************Source**********************************
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
- <ns0:Message1>
- <ns1:UpdateShipTest_MT xmlns:ns1="http://sjm.com/DynConf">
- <DELIVERY>
<DELIVERY_NUMBER>12</DELIVERY_NUMBER>
<TRACKING_NUMBER>3</TRACKING_NUMBER>
<SHIP_DATE>3</SHIP_DATE>
<USER_ID>33</USER_ID>
<SHIP_VIA>3</SHIP_VIA>
<ITMNO>3</ITMNO>
<MATNR>3</MATNR>
<QUANTITY>3</QUANTITY>
</DELIVERY>
- <DELIVERY>
<DELIVERY_NUMBER>121</DELIVERY_NUMBER>
<TRACKING_NUMBER>3</TRACKING_NUMBER>
<SHIP_DATE>3</SHIP_DATE>
<USER_ID>33</USER_ID>
<SHIP_VIA>3</SHIP_VIA>
<ITMNO>3</ITMNO>
<MATNR>3</MATNR>
<QUANTITY>3</QUANTITY>
</DELIVERY>
</ns1:UpdateShipTest_MT>
</ns0:Message1>
</ns0:Messages>
*************************End Source*****************************
This is the one message which is required to be split into two separate Delivery files
***************************************Target Message*******************************
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
- <ns0:Message1>
- <ns1:UpdateShipTest_MT xmlns:ns1="http://sjm.com/DynConf">
- <DELIVERY>
<DELIVERY_NUMBER>4</DELIVERY_NUMBER>
<TRACKING_NUMBER>5</TRACKING_NUMBER>
<SHIP_DATE>5</SHIP_DATE>
<USER_ID>5</USER_ID>
<SHIP_VIA>5</SHIP_VIA>
<ITMNO>5</ITMNO>
<MATNR>5</MATNR>
<QUANTITY>5</QUANTITY>
</DELIVERY>
</ns1:UpdateShipTest_MT>
- <ns1:UpdateShipTest_MT xmlns:ns1="http://sjm.com/DynConf">
- <DELIVERY>
<DELIVERY_NUMBER>46</DELIVERY_NUMBER>
<TRACKING_NUMBER>5</TRACKING_NUMBER>
<SHIP_DATE>5</SHIP_DATE>
<USER_ID>5</USER_ID>
<SHIP_VIA>5</SHIP_VIA>
<ITMNO>5</ITMNO>
<MATNR>5</MATNR>
<QUANTITY>5</QUANTITY>
</DELIVERY>
</ns1:UpdateShipTest_MT>
</ns0:Message1>
</ns0:Messages>
*************************************End Target****************************************
According to interface map I guess the adapter should split the messages but at runtime it gives error.
Thanks and Regards
Rajeev

Similar Messages

1:N mapping without using BPM

Hi All,
I am facing a problem in 1:N mapping without using BPM...
I would explain regarding it first...
Scenarion is from SAP > XI> 3files
I have 4 XSD's 1) one is Source Idoc XSD (all xsd's imported to External def.s)
 2) target file 1 XSD
 3) target file 2 XSD
 4) target file 3 xsd
I have created 4 message interfaces one is Outbound and rest 3 are Inbound
and also i have done mapping : In mapping messages tab i have mentioned the 3 XSD(External definitions) and done the mapping as required...
But now my problem is how to proceed with Interface mapping ...
should i create 3 interface mappings ( ithink no) ... but in IM i am able to create for only one taget Interface .. how to with 3 XSD's ...
Any solution is always thankfull...
and Points are surely rewarded....
Thanks and Regards,
Sridhar Reddy

Hi Sridhar,
Receiver Determinatiion: one Receiver without Condition (Service that has all the Three inbound Interfaces).
Then in Interface Determination choose enhanced and choose ur Interface Mapping that has the Multi Mapping.
It will automatically provide the three inbound Interfaces and u can create ur receiver agreements.
Reference Blog:
<a href="/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible:///people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
Regards,
Sudharshan

Sequential mapping without using BPM

I have a requirement where i need to do a sequential mapping without using BPM. IDoc to file is the first mapping.A few fields of the IDoc are transformed in this mapping. Output of this first one should contain the transformed as well as rest of the fields of the IDoc as it is coz they will be used in the second mapping.
Is this possible any way?

yes soumen...u can do it.in the interface mapping option is there to do that...
but u can do it in a single mapping!!!
go thro' this general Idoc to file scenario...u may get some help
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e07dcaa0-a92b-2a10-3a96-b3d942bd1539

1:N mapping without using BPM -- IDOC to multiple files

Hi all,
I am facing a problem while sending multiple files,
I need to send files ( File1, File2 or FIle3) ...
I was able to successfully send the first 2 files and along with it the 3rd file is being created without any data... How to stop this file( either file2 or file 3 should be created) in creating..
I have done the sceanrio like this, )ALL the source and target files are XSD's imported)
In the Message Mapping Messages Tab
Source is AFS_DELVRY03 occurence is 1,
Target files
rootI8 occurence is 1,
rootI9 occurence is 0...1,
rootIB occurence is 0...1
I have done all the maping part , problem is all 3 files are being created(eventhough 2nd or 3rd has no data) , I need rootIB, either rootI9 or rootIB based on condition,
So any one has done the similar scenario, If please suggest me how to hadnle so that only 2nd or 3rd file should be created,
In Interface Determination i have selected the extended option also...
Should i do any specific handling in the Configuration part or should i create more than one mapping?..
U r suggestions are welcome and will be rewarded with points,
Regards,
sridhar

Venu,
Using a BPM, you can do the mapping / Split as needed and then send the files individually, using a Sens Step as needed. There are multiple ways in which this can be done with a BPM.
But, for a solution without a BPM, as the requirement is such that only 2 of the 3 target messages need to be created, multimapping would not work and the need for conditional routing occurs.So, this would require additional mappings.
The solution is either use a BPM or do the logic using Conditional Routing. Ofcourse the second solution requires 3 mapping programs , but you are avoiding a BPM which can cause a perfromance bottle neck.
If perfromance cannot become a bottle neck, then using BPM would make much more sense , but again it all boils down to the exact requirements and the feasibilty of the solutions!
Regards,
Bhavesh

1:N mapping without using BPM , based on segment conditions

Hi All,
I have to send 3 different files from source based on some conditions
1) for the first file to be sent is okay
2) But for second file and third file i need to check some conditions
the conditions are
If E1EDL44 case detail fields exists i should generate second file and i should not create any third file (it's one or the other, not both).
If E1EDL44 case details doesnot exist i should generate third file and not second file...
So My confusion is how to send either second or third file (any one only)
If i do mapping is it sufficient or also should i use condition editor in Receiver Determination...
Please suggest u r valuable help..
Thanks and Regards,
sridhar

Hi Sridhar,
Make ur second interface Occurence as Optional 0:1 in ur Interfaec Mapping.
In ur Multi-mapping (Message Mapping) also make ur message type corresponding to ur second file as Optional.
In ur mapping check the condition and if doesnot satisfy dont populate the second message type. Check this option.
Regards,
Sudharshan

Two Message Mappings in one Interface Mapping without using BPM

Hello Experts,
I have this scenario, please help me
I have to execute two mappings of which one is a java mapping and then the other is a message mapping sequentially.
The mapping is something like below
Message1 -> (java Mapping) -> Message2
Message2
Message1 -> (Message Mapping) -> Message3
Based on the value in Message2 I have to map Message1 to Message3
I am not an expert in java so please give me options that doesn't involve changing of java code.
The above 2 mappings have to be implemented in only one interface mapping.
Suggestions please.

Hi Ravi!
You say message2 dependes on message1 and message3 is mapped from message1 but using also values from message2? But this means, that whole mapping dependes only on message1!
So change your mapping and use the one not based on message2, but message1. Put these as a condition in interface determination and based on these values use the correct mapping.
Peter
p.s. I'm not sure, if I got your requirement correctly, but your target message dependes only on message1 (since message2 dependes on it too), so this whole mapping can be done as 1. Unfortunately, you'll probably have to change your java part. Bur definetely, Raj is right.
Edited by: Peter Jarunek on Feb 20, 2008 5:36 PM

Multi-Mapping in IDOC without using BPM ?

Hi ,
Please check ..
Can below given blog can be used to achive Multi-mapping in IDOC without using BPM ?
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
Regards
PS

Solved .. Thx every one .
Approache Used :
1. Created mapping with Change signature on target Message type(idoc) with 1..N Occurence.
2. Operation mapping with change Occurence on Target Operation(1..Unbounded) .
3. Used same Operation mapping in Interface Determination with 0..unbounded(Multiplicity).

Multi-mapping with message bundling but without using BPM

Hi all,
I have a requirement to bunch specific no. of records (say 50) from source message and create separate target messages for those bunches. For example, if the source message has 120 records, then there should be three separate target messages created containing 50, 50 and 20 records each.
I am wondering whether this multi-mapping is possible without using BPM, as the typical no. of records in the source message are in the range of 600 to 800, and rarely (twice or thrice a month) they shoot up to 2000. So my concern is whether BPM would affect the performance. We are using PI at SP12.
Regards,
- Shankar.

Sorry for late reply.. Well the sender is a file system, which sends a single XML file containing multiple records. (I mean I have a sender file adapter that polls periodically from a specific path and picks up the file when it is available)
The no. of records in the source file may be different in each run. The requirement on the receiver system is that it can handle a file which has maximum of 'n' records only (say 50 in my example)
Now the sender file can contain any no. of records. It may contain 10 on some day, or 200 the next day, or 120 on the third day. But on the receiver side, I want the files to be created such that each will contain AT MAX 50 records.
So, if source file has <=50 records, then there will be only 1 target file having the same no. of records.
If source file has between 51 to 100 records, then there will be two target files. One will have 50 records, and the second will have remaining records.
And so on..
Regards,
- Shankar.

Duplicate Message ID issue in case of Multi mapping (without BPM)

Hi Experts,
I am doing one sample Example for my requirement of converting the single source message data into the multiple Target messages.
for example, when sender system is sending the 5 sale order details into a single message in PI then my Inbound proxy class of ECC R/3 receiver system must get this sale orders separately, that means inbound proxy class method must be triggered separately for 5 sale orders from sender system. for achieving this, I have used the Multi mapping concept in ESR (without BPM).
This scenario is in Asynchronous mode.
The below screen shots give the details on what I have configures so far.
IN ESR
IN ID
IN SXMB_MONI of PI
IN SXMB_MONI of ECC R/3 Receiver system (Error in Processing)
due to this error, inbound Proxy class method is not being triggered for the single Sale order details as well,
please let me know how to tackle this duplicate message ID issue when we have multiple payloads to process in a single message.
please also let me know if is there any other workaround to fulfil this requirement.
Thank you,
Regards,
Jagesh

Hi Nunu,
Check the below blog for restrictions.
Multi-Mapping without BPM - Yes, it’s possible!
Restrictions
Messages that result from the split in a mapping-based message split are sent using one AE. So only adapters running on the AE are supported. In particular, this means that target IDOC message splits are not supported since the IDOC adapter is not part of the AE.
Regards,
Praveen.

Error in Multi-mapping without BPM

Hi frnds,
I am doing a scenario File-XI-File. I am using the multi-splitting thing in the Message mapping. I have taken care of all the occurance's and "enhanced" thing in the IR and ID resp. I m using SP16. I want to avoid BPM.
But therez sme error cming up. When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping" and when I test my interface using the Test Configuration in the ID, its shwing error in the Receiver Determination -- "HTTP connection to ABAP Runtime failed. Error: 403 Forbidden"
I have checked most of the blogs and forum suggestions. I have checked the ICF activations as well ...
So, do come back to me with your valuable suggestions, and I will award them points, if they really help me out.
Thanks and regards.
Neetesh

Hi Neetesh,

When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping"
For this, Can you check the source XML. Does it contain Tags like <messages> .. If yes, you need to remove them from your source XML.
If i am right, you have copied the XML from the TEST tab of the message mapping and pasted it in a notepad and saved it without making any changes at all..... Just do as i have mentioned above and i am sure you will no more get that error message in your MONI....
Also go through this weblog which talks about multi-mapping without BPM,
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
Regards,
Abhy

Multi-Mapping without BPM

Hi ,
I am following this weblog
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
but stuck up with what are the fields contained by ID in target message2 ...
Please check this for your clarification
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11212307@N08/1135395357/
Thanks
dushanth

ID will have only ID under it. instead of creating flat structure like the one above Jin has changed the strucutre below . you will have only ID field in it or you want u can add other fields in it .
Regards
Sreeram.G.Reddy

Multi Mapping with out BPM and Receiver Determination Condition

Hi Masters,
My Requirement Was:
Proxy will send the data to XI system, Based Customer group number[1000,2000,3000,4000], I need to split the message into 4 messages, and sent to 4 Different location, based on Customer Group condition.
For message split, I fallowed below weblog.
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
Problem is file split correctly, but data goes to all customer groups..
EX
If they send the customer group 1000, I need to send the customer group 1000 file to BS1[Business Server1],
If they send the customer group 2000, I need to send the customer group 2000 file to BS2[Business Server1],
Please guide me,
Thanks,
ANU-

Hi,
Develope it like follow.
Source Structure- Same for everything.
Create 4 different structures for all targets, create 4 different msg types, 4 inbound message interface ( i think you are creating single Message type now, that is the mistake)
In message maaping, add 4 target message types in same MM.. i hope i am clear.. ( same like in blog /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible he has created 2 message types USER_1 and Employee)
keep occurence of all of them 0 to unbunded (not necessary)
Now create mapping for each message type (same like USER_1 and Employee, imagine them like different message types virtually).
Map message type with the source field and mention the condition which you want test using graphical functions. i will say if x e equla to 1 creatif --> target.
I hope i m clear till now...
thanks.

Choosing Receiver Interface (IDoc or RFC) without using BPM

Hi,
We have a scenario wherein the receiver interface (either IDoc or RFC) must be dynamically determined at runtime based on the source message. I've tried using Multi-Mapping but this did not work since IDoc and RFC interfaces are not on the same Adapter Engine.
How do I configure this scenario without using BPM?
Thanks,
Francis

Hi,
>That was my first solution but it did not work since it seems that conditions only work for determining the Operation Mapping to use for the same Receiver interfaces.
not true - not only Operation Mapping but also receiver agreement
so the receiver's channel
>I was misled into thinking that we could use it to dynamically determine the receiver interface.
but you can do it over there
intrface determination can be used for pseudo receiver determination too
so you can have one interface that either goes to one
channel or the other (within the same receiver)
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Asynchronous, but need Ack without using BPM and IDocs.

Hi Experts,
                 I would like to do a scenario i.e., "Asynchronous communication, but need Acknowledgement without using BPM and also without using IDocs whether it is sender side or receiver side". Please help me.
Thanks in advance
Srihari.

Without using BPM will be little longer process. But the alternative way is to add one more receiver in the receiver determination and send some file to that location with the actual mapping getting executed for the actual receiver. and in the second interface you can get the file created at second receiver back to the source location. But this will be little long as compared to synchronous scenarios.
Flow:
Source
          Receiver 1--> Actual mapping as per requirement
          Receiver 2(For Ack)--> Create a mapping with blank file sent to Receiver
Receiver 2-->File Adapter--> Source through 2nd mapping/interface and keep the File adapter pooling interval around 5 sec or less so that you can get the file back to source location.
Regards
Anand

Send multiple records to rfc without using BPM

Dear Experts,
Could you please help on the following scenario.
I need to send multiple customer master data records from a file to rfc without using BPM.
The following is the mapping i am using
source Target( RFC)
====== =============
Tree occurance type Tree occurance
cust_mt 1..1
 customer 0..unbound -
> ztest_cust( rfc ) 1..1
 cname 1..1 -
> cname 0..1
 cno 1..1 -
> cno 0..1
 bank -
> bank 0..1
 item : 0..unbound
 code -
> code 0..1
 name -
> name 0..1
 location -
> location 0..1
1. Multiple banks possible for one customer
2. Multiple customers possible in datafile from mdm
Problem 1:Only one customer record from file is being sent to RFC thouth many records are in the file, the second, third .. and so on records not being sent to rfc.
Problem 2:
if add o.. unbound for the rfc occurance, <messages>,<message1> tags are getting added in message mapping, and no single customer record sent to rfc..
Your help is rewarded with good points.
Appreciate your help.
Thanks.
sravya.

Hi VJ,
Thank you for the immediate reply.
one more thing, when i tried to change the occurences of ztest_cust( rfc) to 0..unbound,
I am not seeing the occurances updated in the imported rfc structure.
The following is the wsdl for rfc, could you please help me to add occurances 0..unbound.
Thanks a lot.
sraya.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<wsdl:definitions xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:rfc="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions" name="ZTEST_CUST" targetNamespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">
 <wsdl:documentation>
 test for mdm
 </wsdl:documentation>
 <wsdl:types>
 <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions" targetNamespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions">
 <xsd:element name="ZTEST_CUST">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:all>
 <xsd:element name="CNAME" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:maxLength value="10" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="CNO" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:maxLength value="10" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="BANK" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:element name="item" type="ZST_CUST" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
 </xsd:sequence>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:element>
 </xsd:all>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="ZTEST_CUST.Response">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:all>
 <xsd:element name="BANK" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:complexType>
 <xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:element name="item" type="ZST_CUST" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
 </xsd:sequence>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:element>
 </xsd:all>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:complexType name="ZST_CUST">
 <xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:element name="CODE" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:maxLength value="60" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="NAME" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:maxLength value="60" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="LOCATION" minOccurs="0">
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:maxLength value="60" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 </xsd:sequence>
 </xsd:complexType>
 </xsd:schema>
 </wsdl:types>
 <wsdl:message name="ZTEST_CUST.Input">
 <wsdl:part name="parameters" element="rfc:ZTEST_CUST" />
 </wsdl:message>
 <wsdl:message name="ZTEST_CUST.Output">
 <wsdl:part name="parameters" element="rfc:ZTEST_CUST.Response" />
 </wsdl:message>
 <wsdl:portType name="ZTEST_CUST.PortType">
 <wsdl:operation name="ZTEST_CUST">
 <wsdl:input message="rfc:ZTEST_CUST.Input" />
 <wsdl:output message="rfc:ZTEST_CUST.Output" />
 </wsdl:operation>
 </wsdl:portType>
 <wsdl:binding name="ZTEST_CUST.SAPBinding" type="rfc:ZTEST_CUST.PortType">
 <rfc:binding style="rfc" />
 <rfc:type name="ZST_CUST">
 <ifr:container xmlns:ifr="urn:sap-com:ifr:v2:metamodel" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
 <ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:description language="EN">
 test
 </ifr:description>
 </ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:sourceSystem />
 <ifr:sourceClient>
 020
 </ifr:sourceClient>
 <ifr:release>
 640
 </ifr:release>
 <ifr:category>
 structure
 </ifr:category>
 <ifr:unicode1>
 true
 </ifr:unicode1>
 <ifr:unicode2>
 true
 </ifr:unicode2>
 <ifr:isFlatStructure>
 true
 </ifr:isFlatStructure>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:internalLength1>
 180
 </ifr:internalLength1>
 <ifr:internalLength2>
 360
 </ifr:internalLength2>
 <ifr:fields>
 <ifr:field name="CODE" category="simple">
 <ifr:descriptor />
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 false
 </ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 <ifr:offset1>
 0
 </ifr:offset1>
 <ifr:offset2>
 0
 </ifr:offset2>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:scalarType>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:type>
 CHAR
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:abapType>
 C
 </ifr:abapType>
 <ifr:length>
 60
 </ifr:length>
 <ifr:internalLength1>
 60
 </ifr:internalLength1>
 <ifr:internalLength2>
 120
 </ifr:internalLength2>
 <ifr:decimals>
 0
 </ifr:decimals>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:scalarType>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:field>
 <ifr:field name="NAME" category="simple">
 <ifr:descriptor />
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 false
 </ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 <ifr:offset1>
 60
 </ifr:offset1>
 <ifr:offset2>
 120
 </ifr:offset2>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:scalarType>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:type>
 CHAR
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:abapType>
 C
 </ifr:abapType>
 <ifr:length>
 60
 </ifr:length>
 <ifr:internalLength1>
 60
 </ifr:internalLength1>
 <ifr:internalLength2>
 120
 </ifr:internalLength2>
 <ifr:decimals>
 0
 </ifr:decimals>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:scalarType>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:field>
 <ifr:field name="LOCATION" category="simple">
 <ifr:descriptor />
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 false
 </ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 <ifr:offset1>
 120
 </ifr:offset1>
 <ifr:offset2>
 240
 </ifr:offset2>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:scalarType>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:type>
 CHAR
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:abapType>
 C
 </ifr:abapType>
 <ifr:length>
 60
 </ifr:length>
 <ifr:internalLength1>
 60
 </ifr:internalLength1>
 <ifr:internalLength2>
 120
 </ifr:internalLength2>
 <ifr:decimals>
 0
 </ifr:decimals>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:scalarType>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:field>
 </ifr:fields>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:container>
 </rfc:type>
 <wsdl:operation name="ZTEST_CUST">
 <ifr:container xmlns:ifr="urn:sap-com:ifr:v2:metamodel" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
 <ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:description language="EN">
 test for mdm
 </ifr:description>
 </ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:sourceSystem />
 <ifr:sourceClient>
 020
 </ifr:sourceClient>
 <ifr:release>
 640
 </ifr:release>
 <ifr:package>
 $TMP
 </ifr:package>
 <ifr:akhNode />
 <ifr:released>
 external
 </ifr:released>
 <ifr:outbound>
 false
 </ifr:outbound>
 <ifr:synchronous>
 true
 </ifr:synchronous>
 <ifr:asynchronous>
 false
 </ifr:asynchronous>
 <ifr:unicode1>
 true
 </ifr:unicode1>
 <ifr:unicode2>
 true
 </ifr:unicode2>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:parameters>
 <ifr:parameter name="CNAME">
 <ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:description language="EN">
 Character Field Length = 10
 </ifr:description>
 </ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:scalarType name="CHAR10">
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 false
 </ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 <ifr:fixedValuesListDefined>
 false
 </ifr:fixedValuesListDefined>
 <ifr:mixedCaseSupported>
 false
 </ifr:mixedCaseSupported>
 <ifr:signedNumber>
 false
 </ifr:signedNumber>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:type>
 CHAR
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:abapType>
 C
 </ifr:abapType>
 <ifr:length>
 10
 </ifr:length>
 <ifr:internalLength1>
 10
 </ifr:internalLength1>
 <ifr:internalLength2>
 20
 </ifr:internalLength2>
 <ifr:decimals>
 0
 </ifr:decimals>
 <ifr:outputLength>
 10
 </ifr:outputLength>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:scalarType>
 </ifr:definition>
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:direction>
 in
 </ifr:direction>
 <ifr:class>
 import
 </ifr:class>
 <ifr:type>
 scalar
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:optional>
 true
 </ifr:optional>
 <ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
 true
 </ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
 </ifr:properties>
 </ifr:parameter>
 <ifr:parameter name="CNO">
 <ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:description language="EN">
 Character Field Length = 10
 </ifr:description>
 </ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:scalarType name="CHAR10">
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 false
 </ifr:helpValuesSupported>
 <ifr:fixedValuesListDefined>
 false
 </ifr:fixedValuesListDefined>
 <ifr:mixedCaseSupported>
 false
 </ifr:mixedCaseSupported>
 <ifr:signedNumber>
 false
 </ifr:signedNumber>
 </ifr:properties>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:type>
 CHAR
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:abapType>
 C
 </ifr:abapType>
 <ifr:length>
 10
 </ifr:length>
 <ifr:internalLength1>
 10
 </ifr:internalLength1>
 <ifr:internalLength2>
 20
 </ifr:internalLength2>
 <ifr:decimals>
 0
 </ifr:decimals>
 <ifr:outputLength>
 10
 </ifr:outputLength>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:scalarType>
 </ifr:definition>
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:direction>
 in
 </ifr:direction>
 <ifr:class>
 import
 </ifr:class>
 <ifr:type>
 scalar
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:optional>
 true
 </ifr:optional>
 <ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
 true
 </ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
 </ifr:properties>
 </ifr:parameter>
 <ifr:parameter name="BANK">
 <ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:description language="EN">
 test bank type
 </ifr:description>
 </ifr:descriptor>
 <ifr:definition>
 <ifr:complexType xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" name="ZST_CUST" type="structure" xlink:role="type" xlink:href="/Content?TYPE=type&NAME=ZST_CUST" />
 </ifr:definition>
 <ifr:properties>
 <ifr:direction>
 inout
 </ifr:direction>
 <ifr:class>
 tables
 </ifr:class>
 <ifr:type>
 structure
 </ifr:type>
 <ifr:optional>
 true
 </ifr:optional>
 <ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
 true
 </ifr:basedOnDictionaryReference>
 </ifr:properties>
 </ifr:parameter>
 </ifr:parameters>
 </ifr:definition>
 </ifr:container>
 </wsdl:operation>
 </wsdl:binding>
</wsdl:definitions>

Multi-map without using BPM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for