Multi Mapping error

Hi,
I am required to have a IP recieve 3 IDOC types triggered from BD10 . It can trigger 3 or more IDOCs. For Eg.
1 ARTMAS (only 1) , 2 INFRECs and 1 LIKOND.
If anyone IDOC has come then after a waiting period of 1 minute it should come out of FORK.
My IP is like this.
In a FORK there are 4 branches.
1) ARTMAS receiver
2) Loop(infinite) with INFREC Receiver and a Container Operation to collect all IDOCs
3) Loop(infinite) with LIKOND Receiver and a Container Operation to collect all IDOCs
4) A wait Step with a container operation to initialize endtime variable
necesary branches: 4
The Fork Comes out when the end condition is met ie the End variable is Set or if all the IDOCS have  come.
Corelation on MATNR.
Next I have the transormation and send step.
In the MM i have 3 Source and 1 Target.
Artmas 0-1 occurance
INFREC 0 - unbounded
LINKND 0-unbounded
I have created the Target with External Definition and have set the correct occurance in the XSD file
I have mapped the neceessary Segments from INFREC and LIKOND and all the Segments of ARTMAS to the Target structure.
In SXMBMONI it says error on Outbound side and
I see Mapping Exception  when I seen in WORKFLOW.
Is my design Correct?
I have tested the Interface & Message Mapping they are correct
Request your help.
John Rajesh
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <MappingTrace>
  <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Namespace:http://test.com/usa/SapRetail/ARTICLE_CLASSIFY/TESTDEMO</Trace>
  <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Name:IM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB01</Trace>
  <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:00000000000000000000000000000000</Trace>
  <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:JAVA</Trace>
  <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_</Trace>
  <Trace level="3" type="T">Multi mapping required.</Trace>
  <Trace level="3" type="T">Creating Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_.</Trace>
  <Trace level="3" type="T">Load b8f12d30-2c45-11da-90af-ef160a892024, http://test.com/usa/SapRetail/ARTICLE_CLASSIFY/TESTDEMO, -1, com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_.class.</Trace>
  <Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_.class (http://test.com/usa/SapRetail/ARTICLE_CLASSIFY/TESTDEMO, -1) in swcv b8f12d30-2c45-11da-90af-ef160a892024.</Trace>
  <Trace level="3" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_</Trace>
  <Trace level="2" type="T">Call method execute of the application Java mapping com.sap.xi.tf._MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_</Trace>
  <Trace level="1" type="T">RuntimeException during appliction Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_</Trace>
  <Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns4:Messages/ns4:Message1/ZARTMAS04_PUB/IDOC. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.start(AMappingProgram.java:292) at

Check the following
1. Have u mapped the root level element?
2. Inside interface mapping, when u say read interface, is it diplaying both the interface.
Also check ur input
may be u r not providing proper input
Regards,
Prateek

Similar Messages

  • SP14 Multi-mapping - error in receiver idoc adapter

    Hi,
    I have a scenario where a business service should send some XML to SAP CRM. I get the file via a sender JMS adapter and try to post it to CRM via a receiver IDOC adapter.
    I have created a multimapping (1:N - 1 XML file to many Idocs) as should in the repository.
    In the configuration under Interface Determination, I have chosen 'RB_SPLIT' and selected the interface multimapping.
    It should be pointed out, that when testing both interface and message mapping i get no error. All idocs seem to be created as they should.
    When testing the setup 'real life' the message fails. The error message in the monitor says:
    - <!--  Call Adapter
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_WRONG_INTF</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>InterfaceCollection</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Unable to interpret IDoc interface InterfaceCollection</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    Notice that the above error is when trying to send only 1 record, which in turn then should result in only 1 idoc.
    If trying to send multiple XML records, i get the following error:
    - <!--  Technical Routing
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">MMF_ENGINETYPE</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>A system error occurred in the outbound binding</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    In the monitor in the payload of 'Request message mapping' I see as many Maindocument, Submaindocument pairs as should be Idocs.
    Now i really don't know how to interpret the error messages in both cases, so I'm a little lost here...
    It should be pointed out that the idoc being used everywhere in this scenario, has not been modified - from all places it is being used (and only exists) in the 'Imported objects | Idocs' place.
    Also the Idoc is also being used as Inbound interface - so no mistakes here either.
    I really hope someone can help me here, as I'm otherwise pretty stuck in this case.
    Best regards,
    Daniel

    Hi Daniel,
    I have exactly the same type of scenario (under SPS14 and now also SPS15), sending an XML message over JMS to XI and trying a multi-mapping to many IDocs (actually a list of orders in XML is mapped to n ORDERS Idocs).
    I also face problems doing so, when I use the IDoc Adapter as outbound in the Receiver Agreement. I receive the following error:
    <i>CO_TXT_MMF_ENGINETYPE
    Messages in multi message format can be sent to one adapter engine only</i>
    However, I tested the same scenario by just changing the Receiver Agreement to a File Communication Channel and - surprise, surprise - it works. One file per IDoc is created.
    Of course, this is not what we want to accomplish, but when I checked this piece of documentation (sorry another link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/content.htm
    the IDoc adapter is not listed in the list of Adapters that are supported. Does that mean, that this feature is not supported for generating IDocs? Maybe that's a question for a SAP OSS Message?
    I hope that helped you a little further - if you find out more I'd be happy to learn about it.
    regards,
    Peter

  • Multi-Mapping Error after copying into new namespace

    Hi everybody,
    we got a BPM running using a multi-mapping.
    We decided to design new namespaces. After copying every IR object (datatype, message-type, mappings etc.) --> SXMB_MONI shows a mapping-error.
    But when I take the payload and test the mapping, everything is fine?
    Any ideas?
    Regards Mario

    Hi,
      If your payload has Messages tab remove that..and test the payload.
    Payload doesn't have any Messages tab.
    Just i have given example payload..this payload two strucures it will split into twofiles..and compare your payload should be like same
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <STRUCTURE>
    <EMP_DETAILS>
       <EMPNO>123<EMPNO>
       <EMPNAME>XYZ<EMPNAME>
    <EMP_DETAILS>
    <STUDENT_DET>
       <STUO>123<STUNO>
       <STUNAME>XYZ<STUNAME>
    </STUDENT_DET>
    <STRUCTURE>
    Regards,
    Venu.

  • Multi-Mapping Error in PI 7.1 - External Definitions

    Hi all,
    We have just upgraded to PI 7.1 from 7.0 and run into an issue with message multi-mappings, just wondered if anyone else had met the same issue and worked it out...
    When creating a message mapping, we are using as the target an external definition which is defined by an XSD generated by a third party tool (Seeburger).
    When I map 1:1 (1 source message to one target message) in the message mapper, all is fine but if I try to create a multi mapping, I get an error. The process is:
    a) I have a message mapping with one target message, defined as an External Definition.
    b) I then go to Signature tab and add a second target message as an External Definition
    c) Click back to Definition tab
    d) Get the error "Object XXXXX | YYYYY not found" - where XXXXX is the external def name and YYYYY is the namespace (the SWCV namespace that is, not the XML namespace)
    This only seems to happen with External Definitions which are autogenerated and I strongly suspect that is has to do with the fact that the tool that generates them always  does so without an XML namespace. I have not proved this though (other Ext Defs with namespaces work for multi-mappings but that is not the only difference so I can't be sure that is the issue but have a strong hunch. This problem did not occur in 7.0.
    Anyone got any ideas?
    Thanks,
    Chris

    Hi,
    This would not be of much help but, I was able to encounter this issue in XI 3.0.
    What we did was to manually edit the XSD and add a namespace to it. I'm not sure if PI 7.1 is able to handle mutiple namespaces, so we limited it to this value <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> and made sure that this value is used for all the External Definitions used in the multi-mapping.
    Regards,

  • Multi Mapping: Error in If Then condition

    Hello Guru's,
    My requirement is to populate multiple target objects based on the source field called location. For testing I have tried If Location = india then source objects will be mapped to MT_Tfile1 other wise it should be mapped to MT_Tfile2(while mapping i am concatenating Fname and Lanme to Name to MT_Tfile2) . See the below mapping screen for more details.
    I am getting error when i try to do test with some input values.
    Not able to figure out what could be the error. Can you pls suggest/help what is the issue here?
    Thanks
    Arun

    Hi Bertoni,
    I did the mapping for MT-Tfile2 as well. Pls see the below screens hot.
    But with this straight mapping, MT_Tfile2 is not populated for the data entered which is not equal to India. It got worked when changed the context of the filed location to messages, see the below screen.
    Can you pls explain the logic behind it? i tried to check with display queue but not able to figure out how it worked.
    Thanks
    Arun

  • Multi-mapping activate changes error

    Good afternoon!
    I want to use multi-mapping to split one IDoc(WBBDLD04) to some xml documents.I want XI to create one xml document per segment E1WBB01 of WBBDLD04 IDoc. I set Occurrence = 0..unbounded for target interface in interface mapping . Then I try to activate changes. IX generate errors:
    MaterialMasterRequestMapping | http://sap.com/xi/SBO:
    A multi-mapping with multiple source or target interface instances is only recommended with asynchronous interfaces, since only a mapping of this type can be used in the process editor. IDoc WBBDLD.WBBDLD04 | urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages are not asynchronous abstract interfaces
    Mapping program Message Mapping MaterialMaster2SBO_GT2 | http://sap.com/xi/SBO does not match the interface mapping. The number or frequencies of source or target messages for the message mapping are not identical to the number or frequencies of source or target interfaces.
    Tell me please, what I do wrong?
    Thanks!
    Lositskiy Alexandr

    Alexandr,
    You need to create an Abstract from your IDoc (Message Interface).
    To use mutli mapping, you need to create a Business Process.  Then in your Business Scenario, use your Business Process and reference your multi map.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Simon

  • Error: 1:n multi-mapping using BPM for file to file scenario

    Hi. Iu2019m trying to do 1:n multi-mapping using bpm scenario. I use file to file. Input file consists of many records and then I want many record to be transformed into many file at target system. I follow step in http://www.riyaz.net/blog/xipi-1n-multi-mapping-using-bpm/. However, I have a problem when file is retrieved in to XI. It doesnu2019t create any output file.
    When I look at SXMB_MONI, it shows u201CNo object type found for the message Check that the corresponding process is activated.u201D Besides, it shows error message "Unable to perform action for selected message" when i clikc at PE in SXMB_MONI.
    I have check at many previous posts with the same error message but still couldnu2019t solve it. I already activate my BPM and check that status in SXI_CACHE = 0. There is noting left in change list of my IR and ID.
    Here is my design and configuration.
    IR
    Data Type: DT_file_split -> for both input and output file
    Message Type: MT_file_split_sender, MT_file_split_receiver
    Message Interface: SI_file_split_in, SI_file_split_out, SI_file_abs_source, SI_file_abs_target
    Message mapping: MM_file_split for mapping MT_file_split_sender with MT_file_split_receiver
    Interface mapping: OM_file_split
    u2022     Source = SI_file_split_out
    u2022     Target = SI_file_split_in
    u2022     Mapping Program = MM_file_split
    BPM following this link http://www.riyaz.net/blog/xipi-1n-multi-mapping-using-bpm/.
    ID
    Import my Integration process
    2 Communication Channel for getting input file (CC_File_split_sender) and creating output file (CC_File_split)
    2 Receiver determination:
    u2022     Source system to BPM using interface SI_File_Abs_source
    u2022     BPM to target system using interface SI_File_Abs_target
    1 Interface determination:
    u2022     from source system to BPM
    u2022     Sender interface: SI_File_Split_Out
    u2022     Receiver interface: SI_file_abs_source
    1 Sender Agreement
    u2022     Commu. Component: Source System
    u2022     Using interface: SI_File_Abs_source
    u2022     Sender Communication Channel: CC_File_Split_Sender
    1 Receiver Agreement
    u2022     Sender Communication Component: BPM
    u2022     Receiver Communication Component: Target System
    u2022     Receiver Interface: SI_File_Split_In
    u2022     Receiver Communication Channel: CC_File_Split
    Anyone know how to fix this?
    Thanks,
    Pavin

    Hi,
    Yes, thats the problem.
    You are creating file from test tab of  1..N mapping .
    In case of 1..N mappping in mapping Extra tags of messages are addded to the data.As shown here:-
    Messages
          Message1
               MessageType
    When you use this mapping to generate xml message then it will add additional tags for <Messages> and <Message1>, which is not correct. it should only have structure of you MT.
    So remove start and end tag of <Messages> and <Message1> from your data file. Mentioned below in bold.
    <xml......>
    <Messages>
    <Message1>
    <MT_...>
    </MT_...>
    </Message1>
    </Messages>
    This should solve your problem.
    Regards,
    Sami.

  • Error in Multi-mapping without BPM

    Hi frnds,
    I am doing a scenario File-XI-File. I am using the multi-splitting thing in the Message mapping. I have taken care of all the occurance's and "enhanced" thing in the IR and ID resp. I m using SP16. I want to avoid BPM.
    But therez sme error cming up. When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping" and when I test my interface using the Test Configuration in the ID, its shwing error in the Receiver Determination -- "HTTP connection to ABAP Runtime failed. Error: 403 Forbidden"
    I have checked most of the blogs and forum suggestions. I have checked the ICF activations as well ...
    So, do come back to me with your valuable suggestions, and I will award them points, if they really help me out.
    Thanks and regards.
    Neetesh

    Hi Neetesh,
    <i>
    When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping"</i>
    For this, Can you check the source XML. Does it contain Tags like <messages> .. If yes, you need to remove them from your source XML.
    If i am right, you have copied the XML from the TEST tab of the message mapping and pasted it in a notepad and saved it without making any changes at all..... Just do as i have mentioned above and i am sure you will no more get that error message in your MONI....
    Also go through this weblog which talks about multi-mapping without BPM,
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
    Regards,
    Abhy

  • Error wile Outbinding of the message in multi mapping

    HI
    I have a scenario SIEBEL->XI->R/3
    the data from siebel system is send through web services
    in xi this data is mapped into 2 IDOCS using multi mapping .
    I tested the scenario and i am getting the following error .
    <b><SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">CO_TXT_MMF_ENGINETYPE</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Messages in multi-message format can only be sent to one Adapter Engine</SAP:Stack>
    </b>
    Can some one help with this issue
    Thanks
    Nikhil

    Nikhil,
    For IDOC bundling, take a look at this blog and note no : 814393.
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

  • Error in multi mapping bpm

    Hi all,
    In bpm, i have used a multi mapping transformation. And I get a error message that ' Cannot produce target element, check  whether the source instance is valid' . And my two source messages are valid.
    But in message mapping, i have given src1 and src2 as source messages in the same order.
    But in the Messages_IN tab of bpm, the order of messages is reversed and it is src2 and src1. Can this be the reason  for my mapping error? If so, how to rectify this.
    If this is not the case, any more suggestions?

    Hi Aarthi,
         Check your occurence of Target strucuture migth be 1 to 1 or 1 to Unbounded.U r message mapping doesn't populates the data for u r target strucutre.Test u r mapping by giving the valid data( Which data is pass of mapping validations).
    In your mapping go to messages tab and check the sequence of your message types are correct or not.If not choose Message types once in correct sequence.
    Cheers
    Veera
    >>> Reward Points,If it is needful.

  • Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM UDFs Error

    hi
    As per the below blog
    Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure
    I have just modified the UDFs(1.selectnodeifA 2.selectNodeifB)
    1.selectnodeifA
    for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
    if(Name<i>.equals("A"))
    result.addValue(Node<i>);
    2.selectNodeifB
    for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
    if(Name<i>.equals("B"))
    result.addValue(Node<i>);
    while checking I am getting the following errors
    Source code has syntax error: 
    D:/usr/sap/D10/DVEBMGS01/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapdc8fa4d0896011dd907d001cc01cef0d/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_bpm_mm_.java:132: cannot resolve symbol
    symbol : variable n
    location: class com.sap.xi.tf._bpm_mm_
    for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
    ^
    D:/usr/sap/D10/DVEBMGS01/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapdc8fa4d0896011dd907d001cc01cef0d/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_bpm_mm_.java:140: cannot resolve symbol symbol : variable n
    location: class com.sap.xi.tf._bpm_mm_
    for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
    ^
    2 errors
    The source code given in the blog is correct ? I thought for loop has not completed
    pls help
    manian

    Hi manian,
    I was having a look to Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure blog.
    The functions are not the same. I mean, yours and blogs functions.
    Each function has two parameters, Name and node. Furtheremore, in the blogs' functions is using arrays and you don't.
    So, the right code will be
    1.selectnodeifA
    for(int i=0;i<=node.length();i++)
    if(Name<i>.equals("A"))
    result.addValue(Node<i>);
    However, if you don't need an advance user defined function as you want to process just one element of the node's queue, you will not need to use for sentence.
    Something like:
    1.selectnodeifA
    // for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
    if(Name.equals("A"))
    result.addValue(Node);
    Hope it is usefull for you.
    Carlos

  • Error when implementing Multi mapping

    Hi all,
    I am carrying out a scenario which invloves multi mapping. I have read both the interfaces in Interface mapping and I have chose extended interface determination. But the message is not getting processed successfully. I get an error in SXMB_MONI saying "NO_RECEIVER_FOUND". Could you plz help me regarding this?
    Thank you
    Indudhar

    you have to define a Receiver Determination for the Sender & Interface  and specify the Receiver there. Furthermore, you will need an Interface Determination to determine the interface of the outgoing message and the mapping
    Finally you will require a Receiver Agreement .
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/19/8dba88b1db634f891622e909565f7a/frameset.htm
    Note: reward points if solution found helpfull
    Regards
    Chandrakanth.k

  • Duplicate Message ID issue in case of Multi mapping (without BPM)

    Hi Experts,
    I am doing one sample Example for my requirement of converting the single source message data into the multiple Target messages.
    for example, when sender system is sending the 5 sale order details into a single message in PI then my Inbound proxy class of ECC R/3 receiver system must get this sale orders separately, that means inbound proxy class method must be triggered separately for 5 sale orders from sender system. for achieving this, I have used the Multi mapping concept in ESR (without BPM).
    This scenario is in Asynchronous mode.
    The below screen shots give the details on what I have configures so far.
    IN ESR
    IN ID
    IN SXMB_MONI of PI
    IN SXMB_MONI of ECC R/3 Receiver system (Error in Processing)
    due to this error, inbound Proxy class method is not being triggered for the single Sale order details as well,
    please let me know how to tackle this duplicate message ID issue when we have multiple payloads to process in a single message.
    please also let me know if is there any other workaround to fulfil this requirement.
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Jagesh

    Hi Nunu,
    Check the below blog for restrictions.
    Multi-Mapping without BPM - Yes, it’s possible!
    Restrictions
    Messages that result from the split in a mapping-based message split are sent using one AE. So only adapters running on the AE are supported. In particular, this means that target IDOC message splits are not supported since the IDOC adapter is not part of the AE.
    Regards,
    Praveen.

  • Multi-mapping for ibound IDOC

    Hi! All
    It would be of great help if you provide your suggestions on:
    Mapping one XML source file to 6 IDOC receivers, 2 of them are of the same type and 4 are distinct idoc types.
    I tried multi-mapping and received the following error:
    "Messages in multi-message format can only be sent to one Adapter Engine"
    Looks like IDOC adapter does not support multi mapping...
    Can you please suggest any other option apart from using BPM(since it consumes lot of resources).
    Thanks a lot!!
    Regards,
    Patrick

    Hey
    its not possible to do Multimapping over IDOC's without BPM.
    other way around can be to do a single -single scenario,suppose u have 6 IDOC's to post then u need to design 6 different scenarios for them.
    without BPM you cant do multimapping for IDOC or HTTP
    Thanx
    Aamir
    Message was edited by:
            Aamir Suhail

  • Multi-mapping 1:n - 1:1

    Hi,
    We are using multi-mapping in a file-to-file interface. When we have 1:n everything is ok, but when we have 1:1 we have this error:
    Success The message status set to DLNG.
    Error Unable to find channel ID
    Error Delivery of the message to the application using connection AFW failed, due to: Couldn't find delivery channel for message: f285a9a0-4a74-11dc-b843-00145e1b2f3d.
    We need this interface working for both 1:n and 1:1 situations.
    Any idea?
    Thanks for your help:)

    Hi Diana !!
    Check this thread:
    Re: Couldn't find delivery channel !!!
    Regards,
    Matias.

Maybe you are looking for

  • USB 2.0 stopped being recognized by USB 3.0 port

    Hey all, Two days ago, I was syncing my iPod Classic (USB 2.0) with iTunes and I also had my USB 2.0 Time Machine drive plugged in (I do not think it was backing up at the time), both of these devices were plugged into the USB 3.0 ports on my 15" Mac

  • Checking hotmail e-mail on phone to sync with computer

    i'm sure this question has been asked 100 times, but i'm new to this website and dont know what to type in to make my answer appear! I have an iPhone 4 and when I check my e-mail on my computer, all the ones that I have previously dealt with (deleted

  • Trouble with Simple RegExp_Instr

    We have a need to examine a string to see if there are any alpha characters and I decided to learn something new and use some of the new RegExp functions. I hope someone can show me the error of my ways. I am using the class alpha but the only letter

  • Changes are not reflect in PRD

    Hi All, i have an issue that is i want to be small change correction in one report in BI DEV system,the changes had done successfully with one transport request,when i transport the request into BI PRD which has been not reflect but in quality change

  • Database restore from old rman backup

    Hi Friends, My database version is oracle 10.2.0 O/s : Windows I have a production database of an outlet. Yesterday night 11pm they have done some wrong transactions and whole stock is showing wrong. They have taken a export backup at 9.30 pm and lat