Multi-user access?

I would like to switch over our organization's website from blogspot to iweb. Right now, several of us have access to the blogspot site so that we can all post. Will I loose multi-user access if I switch to iweb? And, if not, will everyone have to have access to my personal mac account in order to post?
Thanks for the help.

Having multiuser access requires that everyone share the Domain file where iWeb keeps its data and that each person only use the latest version of it. Of course each user must also have a Mac and iWeb installed as well. Personally I would stick with blogspot.

Similar Messages

  • File structure and Multi-user access/control

    Hi All
    Currently evaluating RH. Our plan is to use RH HTML with RoboServer and either SourceSafe or Team Foundation for source control. We will be producing the "printed" manual (PDF) and publishing online help (hopefully html via RH server) from the single source layout
    Given that we will edit content in RH's XHTML editor, I'm not clear on when we should create new files or the granularity of multi-user access. We have 17 apps and I plan to use a master project and merging (because we need to link to related topics in other apps).
    I'm really not sure what should constitute a file in RH. First off, is access controlled at the file level?
    I want to have multiple authors editing the same manual at the same time, so do I need to break the manual into multiple small files (currently it's a single word doc)?
    If I do break it into multiple files, what's the best approach: 1 file per topic (or is this a requirement)?
    Finally, when I come to generate the PDF, will the files be combined. (i.e. can I have different page-breaks than I have in the RH project)?
    Any pointers greatly appreciated
    Regards
    Mark

    Hi,
    First off, is access controlled at the file level?
    Not sure what you mean by that. In source control, you can check in/out ever file independent. Sometimes dependent files will be automatically checked out, for instance images used in the css when you check out the style sheet.
    I want to have multiple authors editing the same manual at the same time, so do I need to break the manual into multiple small files (currently it's a single word doc)?
    That be the idea. Anyway, it's not a good idea to have an entire RoboHelp project in a single topic. You probably want to cut up your contents into the small chunck: topics.
    If I do break it into multiple files, what's the best approach: 1 file per topic (or is this a requirement)?
    In RoboHelp a topic is a HTML file. RoboHelp doesn't force you to split up content into one or more topics. If you are creating help for the web, you want the information to be organized in relatively small chunck so users can quickly scan through it.
    Finally, when I come to generate the PDF, will the files be combined. (i.e. can I have different page-breaks than I have in the RH project)?
    Not sure what you mean by page breaks. As RoboHelp creates HTML files, there are no page breaks such as in paper manuals. When you create a PDF, you combine the topics you need into a single document.
    If a PDF is required for you, you may want to consider not using RoboHelp for your sources. A PDF created by RoboHelp is useful for internal use, but it never seems to get good enough to give to customers. Personally, when a PDF version of a manual is required, I create the manual in FrameMaker and link or import the book into RoboHelp. You can also link Word documents, so you may want to play around with that before deciding whether to use Word, RoboHelp or FrameMaker for your source.
    Greet,
    Willam

  • Multi user access in Single application file

    Hi,
    Is it possible to work Single application but multi-user access in Indesign CS6.
    If yes, Please let me know how to access.
    Thansk,
    Uvaraj S

    I'm not sure exactly what you are asking. InDesign files can be edited by only a single user at one time, but any user can open a file not already in use.

  • Smartview:  Audit of Changes & Multi user access

    Can anyone tell me how can we check smartview logs (from a Word doc) for an HFM application?
    Is it possible to have multi user access to a Word document via SmartView?

    Having multiuser access requires that everyone share the Domain file where iWeb keeps its data and that each person only use the latest version of it. Of course each user must also have a Mac and iWeb installed as well. Personally I would stick with blogspot.

  • Trying to access Lion server remote using multi-user access, but from a legacy Leopard system

    Just purchased a mini server running Lion, and got screen sharing working fine from my legacy system (32-bit so Leopard only). However, I would like to run in multi-user mode, so someone can use the Lion system and another person can access their own account, from the older Leopard system, at the same time. Using multi-user rather than screen sharing. But Leopard does not have the option on the Finder/Share Screen command, the pop-up window to select screen sharing or new virtual session. So, is there a way still to run a new virtual session from a remote client running Leopard?  Since the multi-user capability resides on the Lion server, it should be possible, but how, without the pop-up menu?
    Message was edited by: Kurt-Syracuse

    Hey. I suggest you check out http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=9839785#9839785, where there are a couple solutions posted in regard to the error code -36 when connecting to a samba share. Good luck!
    Jeremy A.
    Tekserve Intern

  • Multi-user access control

    User #1 opens a PDF on a server and starts making changes.  User #2 opens the same file and starts making changes.  User #2 for example can create sticky notes and make lots of comments.  When User #2 tries to save his changes he's denied as User #1 opened the file first.  Is there a way (like with MS office) that User #2 will be warned when opening the file that his version is read-only?
    Thanks!

    Sorry, no.
    Acrobat/Reader do not have their own file locking system (as Office does), so they have no idea that another user is accessing the document until they send the operating system a 'save' instruction, and get an error saying it's not allowed.

  • Will Lightroom help with multi user access to library in OSX 10.9?

    I just bought my first Apple gear. iMac and iPads for family. I downloaded some photos to the iMac via iPhoto and tried to allow other users to share the library. This caused major headaches. Prompts to repair permissions constantly appeared, even after permissions were changed. After a visit to the Apple store for a One to One session, it seems that the OS cannot provide this simple functionality (in windows I simply changed folder permissions and it all worked, access granted).
    In OSX 10.9 I have to create a disk image, move the library there and add tweaks to auto mount the disk image volume on startup;
    I just bought my first Apple gear. iMac and iPads for family. Downloaded some photos to the iMac via iPhoto and tried to allow other users to share the library. This caused major headaches. Prompts to repair permissions constantly appeared, even after permissions were changed. After a visit to the Apple store for a One to One session, it seems that the OS cannot provide this simple functionality;
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1198
    I have a NAS for backups, so buying another external HD I don't need is a waste of money. Surely there must be a simpler way for all users of our iMac to have access to the photo library. I thought it would be a simple folder permission issue.
    Would using Lightroom instead of iPhoto to download and organize my photos and videos solve the problem or is the problem due to the way OS 10.9 works? Would Lightroom provide the same quick sharing functionality with links to Facebook and local email apps etc? Thanks.

    Thanks all for the input. I now have a partitioned external HD. One partition for my iPhoto library and one for Time Machine. All users can now view the photos without being prompted for permission repairs every time iPhoto is launched (amongst other errors, my head is still spinning) . I will backup the photos on the external HD to my NAS.
    I have no photos stored on my iMac's HDD, because it just doesn't work. Allowing access to the library when stored on the iMac's HD across multiple users was a headache that a senior Apple phone support tech struggled with for almost 2 hours (using remote access to view my system), and still the solution fell short. The man was very patient and friendly. He was also knowledgable. Everything he directed me to do made sense. We went around in circles setting permissions for almost 2 hours. It didn't quite work. Still had users being denied access.
    Seems crazy, but having no photos stored on my brand new iMac is the best solution I can come up with. Glad I didn't spring for the SSD.

  • How to set up multi-user access for an email account?

    Hi,
    In our business, we run 3 macs with Mountain Lion and use Mail to access our IMAP account. Each of us needs to be able to respond to and see incoming/outgoing messages on our respective computers. Unfortunately our mail provider doesn't like concurrent connections. What kind of application can we use to synchronize this account so everyone sees the same thing on each computer? Any suggestions appreciated.
    I should note that we actually have 10 e-mail accounts which all need to function this way, but in the interest of simplicity let's consider we have just the one. Because we have 10 accounts, we can't use iCloud sync, nor do I want to because I don't trust it. I'm looking for something bulletproof and ideally locally stored.

    I use Dreamhost and have been happy with them. There are probably a few hundred companies with similar services, although Dreamhost is one of the largest. It is pretty standard practice these days to have either Google or Microsoft transparently hold e-mail services. Exchange has definitely won the e-mail protocol wars. Basically just pick one that uses Google or Microsoft.

  • Airport Disk multi user access

    Hi,
    Can two or more computers access the airport-shared USB disk simultaniously?
    I have an iMac and a MacBook, and before I buy a new AEBS I want to know if those two macs can access the airport USB disk at the same time..
    Thanks in advance!

    Thanks!

  • Multi User request in Access Enforcer

    Is anyone aware of a user limit in an access enforcer multi user request?
    We get errors when we submit  a multi user access enforcer request with more than 25 users.
    Thanks

    Hi
    There is no standard limit even though we advice to keep the user to max of 20 .
    The limit depends upon the email content you have configured .
    In case in your email notifications you have taken the argument USERID then mulitple user creation request causes issue and the limit gets set to anything between 20-25 , again depending on content of the email .
    Thanks

  • Multi-user is disabled!

    Hi,
    I did something foolish by locking myself out of the system. Currently, I am only able to login as a single-user. Whenever I start the system, I am not able to login utilizing any of the user id's. I have tried serveral things including resetting the passwords using nicl command but that didn't help. I have also deleted the appleSetupDone file and went through the setup process, but again, withouth success.
    I am guessing my problem has nothing to do with passwords and everything to do with multi-user permissions to certain system files/folders. I can't recall, but this issue maybe prompted by unchecking the multi-user access in the WorkGroup managment console.
    I would apreciate any help on this matter as currently my system is down. This is a standalone server running Mac OS Server 10.4.8.
    Nawaf
    Mini 1MB   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   Server Edition

    Roger:
    Thanks, that sure helped!
    I first had to manage my services from the "single-user" command line--fsck -fy, mount -uw /, sh /etc/rc, and serveradmin--to allow remote access through WGM. Only then I was able to reset the access rights to users, and thus, regained local control of my server.
    Regards,
    Nawaf

  • Several users on a single file issue: Hosting a multi user Quickbooks file on the WD EX4

    Hello everyone.  This is going to sound like a super specific third party support issue - but there are some universal things going on here that may help others regarding multiple users of individual files on the EX4. My company houses client and billing files on the EX4.  It's all been well and good until we recently allowed multi-user access to our Quickbooks company file.  Of course the goal is to have multiple employees working on the file at the same time from different computers.  We purchased licenses for each - everything is on the up and up. Whereas I could access the company file on the EX4 with no problems on my computer as a single user, now as soon as I turn on multiuser mode in QB to allow others to access the file on the EX4, the file becomes inaccessible.  What do you guys think is happening where one user access to a file on the EX4 is fine, but multiuser access causes the file to be inaccessible?  How do you fix it? Other thoughts, there doesn't seem to be a limitation on the EX4 relating to multiple people accessing the same file - streaming the same song for example.  So why would a billing database file be any different?  Especially when the licenses and program allow that access. Here's more info, if I host the file on my desktop computer everyone can access it in multiuser mode over the network.   The limitation is the WD EX4. What do you think is going on?  (I'd appreciate any insight as I am talking to both tech support teams, QB and WD, this week.)

    Thank you so much for your reply.  The error shows up when one switches to multi-user mode.  It states: Error H101, H202, H303, or H505: when opening your company file  When you open a company file in multi-user mode, you see an error:You're trying to work with a company file located on another computer, and this copy of QuickBooks can't reach the server on that computer (H202).You're trying to work with a company file located on another computer, and that computer needs additional installation and setup. (H101, H303, and H505).It appears that the QuickBooks software on computer [server name] is set up to allow shared connections to the company file, but the QuickBooks software on your computer is unable to communicate with it. (H202).Most often it's an H202 error which suggests that the program can't reach the server on that computer (NAS location). Why would the NAS location become invisible / unreachable once multi-user mode is on?  I really appreciate your expert brainstorm and ideas.

  • Multi user application control data access

    Dear all,
    i am using Oracle Developer Suite 10g and database 10g, windows xp plate form.
    i want to develop multi user application regarding education.
    i have two questions.
    1. i take a start from creating an HR database which have 30 tables.
    this database has 10 users.
    the users will log on from their own schema.
    how they will access the HR schema?
    should i create a public synonym for each table in the HR Schema?
    or should i create a view for each table in each user schema?
    or should i grant select,insert,update etc to each user on HR schema?
    2. i want to control the data access for each user.
    i.e. every student could access his own academic record. each teacher access his own related record, the manager the owner and so on.
    how to accompolish this task? oracle roles are not sufficient for this purpose.
    Your help is highly appriciated.

    How about you start with the basic stuff, like the 2 days developers guide:
    http://www.oracle.com/pls/db112/to_toc?pathname=appdev.112/e10766/toc.htm
    and make it to the advanced developers guide:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/appdev.112/e25518/toc.htm
    and work your way through the concepts manual:
    http://www.oracle.com/pls/db112/to_toc?pathname=server.112/e25789/toc.htm
    and everything else which sounds interesting to you in here:
    http://www.oracle.com/pls/db112/portal.portal_db?selected=5&frame=
    As for your first question this should be covered here:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/network.112/e16543/authorization.htm#BABHFJFJ
    i want to control the data access for each user.This is also documented:
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/network.112/e16543/vpd.htm#CIHBAJGI
    cheers

  • File Discrepancies for Multi Users

    Hi ...
    We are running RH7 and RSC3.1 with 3 users - We identified
    (only yesterday) that after User 1 had deleted one topic file from
    Project Manager and added several others ... User 2 and 3 had
    broken links for these topics.
    We are able to update existing topics by one user, who check
    in, then user 2 and 3 can get the latest version and instantly view
    the changes - lovely!! Exactly what we would expect ...
    But the same is not occurring when we remove or add entire
    topics to both the Project Manager and the TOC ...
    User 2 and 3 see the topics in the TOC with the dreaded red
    cross through them ... and have to try and locate the file or
    restore broken links etc ... to get their view of the project in
    sync with User 1. This seems to defeat the whole purpose of being
    able to have a multi user authoring environment????
    A major concern of this problem appears to be the risk of
    undoing each others work by potentially restoring files that
    another user intended to remove ...
    Is anyone else experiencing similar issues ... we are in a
    big organisation and are very restricted in terms of our ability to
    access the servers etc ... but I want to know if there is something
    we should be checking or doing differently from an application
    perspective? Any advice or ideas are greatly appreciated...
    Many thanks ...
    Frustrated!

    Hi Fi@qldpol, and welcome to the board. With your situation,
    there are two likely possibilities:
    1. Was your project added to source control via RoboHelp, or
    was it initially added using RoboSource Control? If it was added
    from RoboSource Control, then that is the problem.
    2. If #1 is not the problem, then you might be having
    problems with some of the users' CPD files. First, have everyone
    make backups of the local version of their project (the files
    actually residing on their PCs). Then have User 2 and User 3 delete
    their copy of the project, and replace it with a copy of User 1's
    local files. Before they open the project, they should delete the
    cpd and pss files. After they delete those files, they can open the
    project as usual and let the cpd file rebuild. We have to do this
    every so often with some of our projects to get everyone
    synchronized.
    Hope that helps.
    G

  • Multiple users access one iPhoto library and view and edit

    I have 3 Macs and 5 users in our family. I'd like to have one iPhoto library that any user can access from any of the machines and view and/or edit. I don't need simultaneous access (which from reading posts I can see is not possible in iPhoto).
    If I move the library to external HD will I be able to access the libary from each Mac over Wi-Fi? From what I read I'd need to hold ALT when opening iPhoto in each user account, on each Mac, and choose the library on the external drive.
    If I set it up like this then once photos imported any user can see them, and edit if they want to? Presumably any Projects would be in the one central library rather tan being specific to a particular user?

    Yes and no
    the hard drive that the iPhoto sits on must be formatted Mac OS extended (jorunaled)
    iPhoto is not a multi user program and if two different people edit atthe same time it will not wrok correctly
    Most importantly WiFi is not a reliable connection and has many dropouts - if you edit over WiFi you are highly likely to lose data and corrupt yoru library - it is not a good idea - viewing is slow but will work
    LN

Maybe you are looking for