Multimapping Without BPM?

Hi @ ,
I need some help regarding my multimapping without BPM .
I have configured the scenarion but the problem is that I am not getting the output files with data and are coming empty though the scenarion is gettig executed successfully.
Also in the trace I have observed that there is not step like maping called in the pipeline steps dont know where is the error .Please help
Thanks in advance

Hi Raj,
I have defined the interface mapping as Enhanced where I ahve given the mapping defined as Multimapping and after saving I am getting 3 interfaces belonging to each message also and I have defined the Message interfaces also for each .
I am doing File2 File Scenarion I am able to execute the scenarion and the file was deleted from the location and 3 files were craeted in the destination folder but they only contain header data and there is not other message.
I have tried putting the same input message in Mapping and Interface mapping to verify but there it is creating the messages
Regards

Similar Messages

Problem in multimapping without BPM

Hi,
I am doing a file to file multimapping scenario (1:n) in PI 7.0. In interface mapping the source has occurence of 1 and target occurrence is 0..unbounded.
Problem is with this configuration, in my ID interface determination, the interface mapping is not being recognised and I'm getting "object not found" when trying to select the interface mapping. and there is no problem with inbound and outbound interfaces.
However, when I change the occurrence of my target to 1 in IR, then I can select the interface mapping in Interface Determination in ID.
Could any one please throw some light on this problem?
Regards,
Shiladitya

Hi,
Pls use Enhanced option in Interface determination.
try to assigh interface mapping and your inbound interfaces.
check the following blog.
https://weblogs.sdn.sap.com/pub/wlg/3115. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
regards
mahesh.

Different message recievers without BPM

Hi All,
If I want too send the 3 message records to 3 different recievers without BPM then how can I proceed.
For e.g. I have 3 records Rec1, Rec2, Rec3. I want to send them to 3 recievers then what could be the approach.
Another question: Is multimapping applicable only for BPM? Is it not possible to use multimapping without BPM.
Thanks,
Amit

HI ,
You can refer the below links
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2005/08/03/xpath-to-show-the-path-multiple-receivers
/people/stefan.grube/blog/2006/09/18/collecting-idocs-without-using-bpm
One adaptive RFC Model and Multi Backend System.
Also
adapter specific properties (http receiver adapter)
You can identify the receiver in mapping and this(MM) can be refered in Receiver determination by extendedoption
Regards
Chilla

Multimapping (1:N) without BPM idoc to file

Hi
I have a scenario in PI7.1 like source is idoc ,it should be splitted into 14 different files based on some condition.
I am doing this without BPM(1:N) message mapping and operational mapping is working fine.
Whent i am testing,empty files are generated means no values comming except the target message type.
Note: checked the most of the links and blogs but no help
Everything seems fine but not getting the values.Can anybody help. Can multimapping done with source idoc?
Thanks in advance.
Thanks
Prasad Nemalikanti

Hi Prasad,
It will definitely work and please see the jin for exactly the same scenario.
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
While testing in mapping make sure you put your payload within:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
 <ns0:Message1>
 <YOUR PAYLOAD HERE>
 </ns0:Message1>
</ns0:Messages>
Regards,
---Satish

1:N mapping without BPM ( Idoc Receiver)

Hi,
I have a scenario like 1:N, source would be JMS and the receiver side have two Idocs with the same business system. based on one Item segment value, I need to route the input JMS message to corresponding receiver IDoc.
INput Structure:
Record
Header 1..1
H1
H2
H3
Item 1..Unbounded
I1
I2
I3
NOte: Based on value I2, I need to route the message to corresponding receiver Idoc. like If I2=A then Idoc1 and I2=B then Idoc2. Can we achieve the same without using BPM?
-Esha

Hi,
This can be achieved with Interface Determination conditions. Go for 2 mapping. And in Interface Determination put condition to check which mapping to use. No need of ccBPM.
If you still want to go for 1:N multimapping please refer link:
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
without BPM.
Regards,
Vineetha.
Edited by: Vineetha on Apr 27, 2010 11:44 AM

Complicated n:1 mapping without BPM

Hi all,
I have a very hard requirement from my boss.
There will be two source csv files. Header and Details.
The target is an IDOC.
There can be multiple lines in the Header, and in the Details as well. I need to join these two files and then group the right Header and Detail (using a key field in both sources).
Here is an example:
Source Header File
123456 10001 20110809 cotton
111111 10002 20110808 wood
121212 10003 20110807 metal
Source Details File
123456 London A
123456 Paris B
123456 Amsterdam C
111111 Japan A
111111 Singapore B
111111 China C
121212 Egypt A
121212 South Africa B
121212 Syria C
Target
1st IDOC
123456 10001 20110809 cotton
123456 London A
123456 Paris B
123456 Amsterdam C
2nd IDOC
111111 10002 20110808 wood
111111 Japan A
111111 Singapore B
111111 China C
3rd IDOC
121212 10003 20110807 metal
121212 Egypt A
121212 South Africa B
121212 Syria C
I need to do this without BPM. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Regards,
SAPenthusiast

Create 2 message types for header file having same fields but with differnt name ,
2 message types for detail file having same fields but differnt name
In the second message type add extra field called header and detail respectively
for header --- Map message type 1( header) with message type 2 ( header only but with an extra field )
for detail --- Map message type 1( detail ) with mesage type2 ( detail only but with an extra field for file name)
then comes the multimapping in which source will be message type 2 of header and message type 2 of detail and target will be idoc
since both the source message type will have source data and file name in them .. write a logic and try
first the single one -to one mapping will get executed then the multimapping will get executed ( if u write condition in it)
even if u place both the files simultaneously on server there will be time gap in picking of these files therfore you have to write the condition and identify in multimapping to check and see that one header and one detail is present
hope this helps I m not too sure .. BPM will only be used in case when u want the files at the same time for multimapping
if u can try and find logic to avoid that it wil work
thanks
Ninad

IDoc Collection in BPM and Without BPM

Hi All
I'm much confused on IDoc collection for which i require your expertise to clear my doubts. My primary question is based on the context "Multimapping doest work with idocs".
consider the case -> collect files-idoc scenario. Using BPM i need to have
a multimapping scenario. In the transformation step we will have a container element where mutiline is enabled so that the collected files are transformed into one abs interface. my dopubt arises here when i consider this scenario without bpm that is N:1 mapping (no collection). in this case why this multimapping works in bpm process and not incase of non-bpm scenarios? is it because in bpm the mapping happens in BPE?
pls clarify.
thks
Prabhu

>>>>In an N:1 scenario without BPM, how could you send more than one message to your multi-mapping? You can't.
yes we cant as this validation is not supported at abap stack level and N:1 is possibkle without BPM (or i'm missing something here). but this same step with bpm get executed succceffuly. whats the logic behind it
Message was edited by:
Prabhu S

How to send two different IDocs to SAP without BPM

Hi Experts,
I am working on jms to IDoc scneario,my requirement is to convert one JMS messge in to 2 IDocs(DELVRY,MATMAS) to ECC , i searched in SDN to achieve this requirement without BPM, i found one blog,but its saying its not possible to use multi mapping scenarios with out BPM in IDoc
what is the best approch to achieve my requirement without BPM.
Regards,
James

is it true that multi mapping not going to support IDoc scenarios??
Yes it is true that IDOC does not support multi-mapping....this can be proved if you look into the help section which shows the list of adapters supporting multimapping....IDOC is missing from that list....do not get confused between Idoc Multimapping and IDOC Bundling.....IDOC bundling means bundling IDOCs of same type...however you are looking for IDOCs of different types.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Suggestion required for with or without BPM

I have a requirement IDOC-XI-SOAP.
I am using multimapping 1:N one idoc gets spilt into say three wsdl, A B and C.
My first requirement is if A fails then B and C should not be sent.
If I use only EOIO without BPM then I will need to identify B and C for the corresponding A in the queue and remove it.
That looks tedious as sometimes B and C may not be there for A and is there any way to identify the related messages?
This can be achieved through BPM I believe.
My second requirement is IDOC2 should not be processed before IDOC1.
So If I used BPM will this be guaranteed? is BPM EOIO. (Even after transformation step?) If not then can it be configured?
Thanks in advance.

Hi all,
Just bringing this topic up again as I have stuck at one place. and found not much help on SDN.
I have designed this requirement using BPM.
That is IDOC-BPM-SOAP.
Within BPM I make a synchronous call to Webservice. if there is a fault exception thrown the BPM workflow stops at that point and no further process steps are carried out. This is working fine as per the requirement.
But this does not get blocked up in the BPM queue. I want to stop the next IDOC from processing before handling the prviously errored IDOC scenario.
Now I briefly understand that since BPM is doing a sync call these are not placed in the queue. Is there a way I can handle this so that these interfaces are placed in the BPM queue (which starts with XBQO$PE_WS.....).
I have tried with exception branch, even this stops the BPM workflow but does not block the queue, or the workflow gets processed successfully.
Is there anyway I can block the queue if the BPM synch call fails?

File-RFC-File (without BPM)- Issue

Hi All,
I am working on a File-RFC-File (without BPM) scenario in PI 7.1.
My scenario is having few problems like, its not able to delete the file from the source directory path (for which we have delete permissions) and it is an NFS system and it shows an error in the Sender file CC.
"Error: com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.impl.exception.CPAObjectKeyException: Value of key must not be null: ObjectId"
But it gets processed successfully and provides a written paramter which I could see in MONI, but again doesn't write the file in the target directory. Could you please provide your inputs and let me know if I need to do any additional settings w.r.to PI7.1.
These are the parameters which I have specified in the Sender File adapter
Processing sequence
AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean Local Enterprise Bean 1
CallSapAdapter Local Enterprise Bean 2
AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean Local Enterprise Bean 3
Module configuration:
1 PassThrough true
3 receiverChannel <FilereceiverCCname>
3 receiverService <Receiver Bus System>
Regards,
Nithiyanandam

Hello,
Check out in module configuration tab for any "type error" or spell mistakes.
Check out this thread which might be useful for you :[ File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.|File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19.]
regards
Ramesh

Alert on a variable without BPM

Hello,
I have implemented a Idoc-PI-File scenario to integrate ECC to ESourcing.
I have implemented basic alert with the help of SAP ABAP table.
I want to trigger alert on a specific variable/field of the payload.
I can do that with the help of BPM. Is it possible without BPM?
Kindly reply.
Thanks & Regards,
Vishal K

Hi Vishal,
As mentioned in the blog /people/bhavesh.kantilal/blog/2006/07/25/triggering-xi-alerts-from-a-user-defined-function, alerts can be triggered from UDF.
In PI7.1, alerts can be triggered by using "RFC Lookup" standard function instead of UDF. SALERT_CREATE need to be used in the "RFC Lookup" standard function of Graphical Mapping. Refer this blog to work on RFC Lookup: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20befc9a-aa72-2b10-ae9b-b0988791d457
Regards,
Geetha

Duplicate Message ID issue in case of Multi mapping (without BPM)

Hi Experts,
I am doing one sample Example for my requirement of converting the single source message data into the multiple Target messages.
for example, when sender system is sending the 5 sale order details into a single message in PI then my Inbound proxy class of ECC R/3 receiver system must get this sale orders separately, that means inbound proxy class method must be triggered separately for 5 sale orders from sender system. for achieving this, I have used the Multi mapping concept in ESR (without BPM).
This scenario is in Asynchronous mode.
The below screen shots give the details on what I have configures so far.
IN ESR
IN ID
IN SXMB_MONI of PI
IN SXMB_MONI of ECC R/3 Receiver system (Error in Processing)
due to this error, inbound Proxy class method is not being triggered for the single Sale order details as well,
please let me know how to tackle this duplicate message ID issue when we have multiple payloads to process in a single message.
please also let me know if is there any other workaround to fulfil this requirement.
Thank you,
Regards,
Jagesh

Hi Nunu,
Check the below blog for restrictions.
Multi-Mapping without BPM - Yes, it’s possible!
Restrictions
Messages that result from the split in a mapping-based message split are sent using one AE. So only adapters running on the AE are supported. In particular, this means that target IDOC message splits are not supported since the IDOC adapter is not part of the AE.
Regards,
Praveen.

File sender adapter:FILE to IDOC without BPM, can't see in SXMB_MONI.

Hi all
I have a FILE - XI - IDOC Async scenario without BPM.
I configured FILE sender adapter and IDOC receiver adapter. I made a mapping to transfer file data to the structure of IDOC.
Now when i am trying to load the file using command prompt, i cud see nothing in the monitoring. Whereas if i go to the communication channel monitoring of runtime workbench, i saw that CC is polling correctly and was reading the file also.
And also wen i saw in the processed folder which i mentioned in the CC configuration for the ARCHIVE DIRECTORY, i saw that file got transferred to the folder also.
I don't understand why i cant see anything in the monitoring.
Could anybody help me to rectify the problem. Is there anything i m missing ?
Regards
Naina

Rajesh/Amar
TCode:: SXMB_ADM->Integration engine configuration->specific configuration->runtime
Trace_Level = 3 then you can get all MONI PIPELINE Steps also
I did this change but cudn't see anything in SXMB_MONI.
This is how i have configured my process:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/FiletoMultipleIDOCSplittingwithoutBPM
But instead of IDOC splitting i have simple FILE - XI -IDOC scenario.
I have configured everything exaclty the same way it is mentioned here. But for me the process is not visible at all.
I can't even see the first request message in the monitoring.
This is the message i can see in the communication channel monitoring:
2010-05-24 09:07:41 Success Channel CC_*: Entire file content converted to XML format
2010-05-24 09:07:41 Warning Channel CC_*: Empty document found. Proceed without sending message
2010-05-24 09:07:41 Success File "/xyz/ABC.txt" archived after processing
Is there any problem with the file and that could be the reason it cant convert the file to the request message MT_REQUEST and thus am not able to see anything in monitoring.
help me guys....this is a simple process and i m stuck...its frustrating
Regards
Naina

Multi-Mapping without BPM

Hi ,
I am following this weblog
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
but stuck up with what are the fields contained by ID in target message2 ...
Please check this for your clarification
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11212307@N08/1135395357/
Thanks
dushanth

ID will have only ID under it. instead of creating flat structure like the one above Jin has changed the strucutre below . you will have only ID field in it or you want u can add other fields in it .
Regards
Sreeram.G.Reddy

Error handling in File - XI - SOAP scenario without BPM

Hello!
We have a File -> XI -> SOAP scenario without BPM. The problem is that if the Web Service sends back an error XI tries to reprocess the same message again and again instead of taking the next one.
We do not want set the retry interval to NULL because most error cases are temporary connection problems and then also those messages would not automatically be reprocessed any more.
We also have to use BE instead of EO, otherwise the Web Service will not return a response. But we need the response to be sure that the processing was successful. The message volume in this scenario is quite high and we do not want to use BPM only for the error handling.
I know that from SP19 some additional adapter modules are available for async - sync scenarios without BPM. I tried to configure it like described in File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19. but it did not solve the problem. Does anybody have any other ideas? Thanks.
Regards, Tanja

Hi Tanja,
>>>The volume is 3000 messages/day on business days and 700 messages/day during weekends but the traffic will increase in the future
I think, you should check that out. It is assumedly only 2 days work to build a scenario:
IDoc -> BP
BP <-> SOAP/HTTP
BP -> IDoc (Acknowledgement)
In the process you need a condition branch, where you decide success or not. You need 2 Interface Mappings for filling the ALEAUD.
Just send 1000 IDocs to the Test-XI and look to performance monitoring at Runtime Workbench, to find out, how many message will be processed in one hour. Assumedly 3000 and more per day should be possible. The advantage would be to reduce number of systems (no file system) and messages (better monitoring) and using the standard (better maintenance).
>>>So you are suggesting I should use HTTP adapter and then add the SOAP header manually in a mapping?
Yes, build the SOAP envelop during the mapping. Most easy is to use XSL or, if your mapping is ready, an additionsal XSL. You can put the error into the Acknowledgement to see it in ERP transaction WE02.
Filling of ALEAUD fields:
E1ADHDR/MESTYP: original message type
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/DOCNUM: original IDoc number
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATUS: 68 in case of error, 53 in case of success
E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATXT: Short description for R/3 user what has happend
I ve done such a scenario several times. That works without any problems.
Regards,
Udo

Multimapping Without BPM?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for