Multiple Account assignment in PO cause no GR value

HI,
In PO, we have multiple account assignment, and thus the GR,Non-Valuated will be checked automatically. In this case, we can only have the financial posting have the invocie receipt time.
We can have the correct financial posting, but will not the real time posting after GR before IR.
Like we have GR, but after 2 months we shall have IR. Before we IR, we can not found any Financial posting for Goods receipt. Do we have any solution for this?
Kerry Liu

May i ask the reason why SAP can not do value GR for multi-accoutn assignment? As our Finance team to have financial posting when they have the good receipt, seemed it's hard to do if we use multi-account assignment? or any other better ways?

Similar Messages

Down payment with multiple account assignment PO

Dear Experts,
While posting down payment request through transaction F -47 with
reference to purchase order we are getting below given error.
In that purchase order we have given
multiple account assignment i.e. multiple cost centers (e.g. Cost center A 50% cost center B 10% Cost Center C 40% i.e. distribution by %)
but
system is flagging message
Item 00010 of purch. document 4500024875 contains no suitable account
assignment
Message no. ME717
What will be the possible cause?
regards,
Abhijit

Hi,
In the request f-27 tr.code give the purchase order which item you want to give ie., for above said example 10 is a line item of 4500024875 - purchase order and beside you have to mention
10(lineitem) 4500024875 (purchase order) 2009 (year)
and system will take that request against the above purchase order.
Regards,
satish

Multiple account assignment for distribution of freight cost in MIRO Transaction

Hi MM Gurus
I have created one Purchase order with multiple account assignment for Asset 'A' in which freight cost is added.
I have done good receipt in which only material document is generated. (No financial document generated).
While doing the MIRO for the same Purchase order I m not able to view delivery cost for the same.
I check this thing in SDN but no concrete solution ..
My question is how to capture delivery cost in Multiple account assignment Purchase roder
Regards
Amit

Hi,
You have done goods receipt for Asset PO but no accounting document created. Now cross check in t.code:OME9 and find GR Non-Valuated check box selected which cause your concern on why your accounting document created for goods receipt for Asset PO!
Check how delivery cost designed for your Asset Purchase, may be in your case - delivery cost added to your asset purchase- which result, you could not find delivery cost in invoice posting!
Regards,
Biju K

Hard Question:   Item-Based Approval for Multiple Account Assignment?

Hi Vadim and community,
Possibly.. this is my hardest question for you.
We need to implement Item-Based Workflow Approval. The CC Owner should approve only the items assigned to his/her CC.    We'll do this reading R3(CO) data.
Thats not the problem.
The problem is: I need to use Multiple Account Assignment. I'll distribute one time in 3 o more CC.   Is it possible to have an CC-Based Workflow Approval ?   I mean, The CC owner should approve partly the item assigned to his/her CC.
Anybody knows something ?
Thanks for your reply !!! =)
Regards,
Diego

Hi Diego,
In my understanding you want to define one or several level of approval depending on the CC assignement on each item.
lets take an example:
CC1 owner approver1, CC2 owner approver2 and CC3 approver3
For a SC:
-Item 1: 20% on CC1, and 80% on CC2
-Item 2: 20% on CC1, and 60% on CC2, and 20% on CC3
Then in the item level BADI, you'll define:
-Item1:
Level1 ==> approver1
Level2 ==> approver2
-Item2:
Level1 ==> approver1
Level2 ==> approver2
Level3 ==> approver3
I had this requirement on a project, and the hard part was not the BADI implementation, but the CC owner link with the SRM users (cause all approvers have to be declared on the SRM, and integrated in the SRM org plan).
Regards.
Vadim

Multiple Account Assignment at the time of Good Receipt for one line item

Sap Members.
We have some contracts with cost center distributions that the exact amount is not known. These Blanket Orders require a receiving confirmation.then only we can conclude the cost center, If we create one line item with total amount of contract to one cost center, is there a way can we distribute this cost to the different cost centers at the moment receiving the goods
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Nick

Please Check SAP Notes - Oss Notes
With multiple acct. assignment, enter GR non-val. or cancel GR
Message no. 06417
Diagnosis
In the case of PO items assigned to more than one account, instead of valuation being carried out at the time of goods receipt, the relevant materials are not valuated until the invoice data is entered into the system.
Procedure
     Set the indicator for non-valuated goods receipts
or
     Cancel the GR indicator.
OSS-Notes.                              -
Version: 5        -
Validity: valid since 12.04.2007
Note 204252 - Valuated goods receipt for multiple account assignment
Summary
Symptom
You cannot use the valuated goods receipt function in combination with multiple account assignment.
Other terms
EKPO-WEUNB, screen 0113, ME21, purchase order, 06417, 06 417
Reason and Prerequisites
We have not implemented this function since users who post goods receipts would have to determine the distribution to individual account assignment items during partial deliveries. Generally, users cannot or should not determine this.
An automatic distribution also causes problems and is also not implemented due to technical reasons

GR and GR Non Val indicator in R/3 PO for multiple account assigned SC's

Hi,
We are on SRM 3.0(EBP 4.0) and R/3 4.7.
We have implemented the BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK badi for setting or clearing the GR and IR indicators under certian conditions.
But for Multiple account assigned SC's we get an error message "06181 With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR i ndicator ".
We have tried implementing note# 872000, but this has not solved the issue.
The PO's get created only if we force the GR indicator when transferring the data into R/3.
It seems clear that while creating the PO the system is encountering the GR Non Val indicator but not the GR indicator, so its throwing the error message (we get the same error message when we create the PO from R/3 with GRnon val indicator checked and GR ind unchecked).
The proposed solution is that in the same BADI, along with clearing the GR indicator, we will also clear the GR non val indicator.
This can solve the issue if the indicators are transferred as it is from EBP.
But can anyone tell me if these indicators are also checked/changed in any FM/program in R/3 before the PO is created?
Is there any customizing setting which is affecting this particular behaviour?
Regards,
Srivatsan

Hi Srivatsan ?
In ECC, you have a configuration point :
Materials Management->Account Assignment->Maintain Account Assignment Categories
Here you can untick the indicator you want by account assignment category;
Kind regards,
Yann

ERROR WHILE POSTING MIRO FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT (ASSET)

Hi Guys,
We created a PO for asset with multiple account assignment. And we immediately do IR instead of GR.
While doing IR it is giving error
1) Quantity delivered is zero - Warning message
2) Account 245350 requires a Transaction Type or is Invalid - Error message
what may be the problem. how can we eliminate and post it
Regards
palani

Hi,
I would assume the G/L account you used was not properly set up. Did you get the same problem if you try to change to another G/L account? Perhaps, get your FI specialist to look into this G/L account-related error and verify it.
Cheers,
HT

'BAPI_PO_CREATE1' Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS item

'BAPI_PO_CREATE1' -> This BAPI works perfectly without the 'account assignment' option . But for purchase requisitions which have account assignments BAPI returns the error - E|8W |185   |Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS items.
Can somebody please help me to get this error resoleve .
My coding I have done like below.
DATA: pohead TYPE bapimepoheader.
DATA: poheadx TYPE bapimepoheaderx.
CONSTANTS : c_x VALUE 'X'.
DATA: exp_head TYPE bapimepoheader.
DATA: return TYPE TABLE OF bapiret2 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: poitem TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitem WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: poitemx TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitemx WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: posched TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedule WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: poschedx TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedulx WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: POACCOUNT TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNT WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: POACCOUNTX TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNTx WITH HEADER LINE.
pohead-comp_code = '1000'.   "IEQ1 plant. "'1000'.
pohead-doc_type   = 'NB'     .
pohead-creat_date = sy-datum   .
pohead-vendor = EKKO-LIFNR. "'0000500004'.
pohead-purch_org = purch_org.
pohead-pur_group = purch_grp.
pohead-langu      = sy-langu   .
pohead-doc_date   = sy-datum.
poheadx-comp_code = c_x.
poheadx-doc_type   = c_x.
poheadx-creat_date = c_x.
poheadx-vendor     = c_x.
poheadx-langu      = c_x.
poheadx-purch_org = c_x.
poheadx-pur_group = c_x.
poheadx-doc_date   = c_x.
poitem-po_item    = iLineItem.      "1.
poitem-material   = req_item-MATERIAL.   " '000000000040000234'.
poitem-plant      = req_item-PLANT.
poitem-quantity   = req_item-QUANTITY.
poitem-net_price = NET_PRICE.
poitem-price_unit = PRICE_UNIT.
poitem-shipping   = 'Z1'.
poitem-preq_no    = req_item-PREQ_NO.
poitem-preq_item = req_item-PREQ_ITEM.
poitem-acctasscat = 'K'.
APPEND poitem.
poitemx-po_item    = iLineItem. "1.
poitemx-po_itemx   = c_x.
poitemx-material   = c_x.
poitemx-plant      = c_x .
poitemx-quantity   = c_x .
poitemx-tax_code   = c_x .
poitemx-item_cat   = c_x .
poitemx-acctasscat = c_x .
poitemx-net_price = c_x.
poitemx-price_unit = c_x.
poitemx-shipping   = c_x.
poitemx-preq_no    = c_x.
poitemx-preq_item = c_x.
poitemx-acctasscat = c_x.
APPEND poitemx.
POACCOUNT-PO_ITEM = iLineItem.
POACCOUNT-SERIAL_NO = iLineItem.
POACCOUNT-GL_ACCOUNT = '0000211010'.
POACCOUNT-SD_DOC = '0001001056'.
POACCOUNT-ITM_NUMBER = '000100'.
POACCOUNT-CO_AREA = '1000'.
APPEND POACCOUNT.
POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEM = '00001'.
POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NO = '01'." '01'.
POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEMX = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NOX = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-GL_ACCOUNT = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-SD_DOC = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-ITM_NUMBER = 'X'.
APPEND POACCOUNTX.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'
    EXPORTING
      poheader = pohead
      poheaderx = poheadx
    IMPORTING
    exppurchaseorder = ex_po_number
    expheader        = exp_head
    TABLES
      return    = return
      poitem    = poitem
      poitemx   = poitemx
      POACCOUNT = POACCOUNT
      POACCOUNTX = POACCOUNTX.

I found the answer

Urgent plz...Error: Multiple Account assignment in BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE

Hi All,
I'm using BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE to create the PR . The PR is created successfully with service lines. The service lines for PR item has to be assigned to different account assignment. My problem is that account assignment is not getting assigned to the service line for multiple account assignment cases, instead the account assignment is blank for the sevice line.
Here is part of my code.
For Account Assignment
t_requisitionaccoun-preq_item = '00010'.
t_requisitionaccoun-serial_no = '01'.
t_requisitionaccoun-g_l_acct = '0000630010'.
t_requisitionaccoun-cost_ctr = '0801112560'.
append t_requisitionaccoun
t_requisitionaccoun-preq_item = '00010'.
t_requisitionaccoun-serial_no = '02'.
t_requisitionaccoun-cost_ctr = '0801111710'
t_requisitionaccoun-g_l_acct = '0000610090'.
append t_requisitionaccoun
t_requisitionaccoun-preq_item = '00020'.
t_requisitionaccoun-serial_no = '01'.
t_requisitionaccoun-cost_ctr = '0801111710'
t_requisitionaccoun-g_l_acct = '0000610090'.
append t_requisitionaccoun
For Service account Assignment
*<b>PR item 10</b>
Service item 1
t_requisitionsrvaccass-pckg_no = '0000000002'.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-line_no = 2. " line 1 is the header for service
t_requisitionsrvaccass-serno_line = '01'.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-quantity = '10'
t_requisitionsrvaccass-serial_no = '01'
APPEND t_requisitionsrvaccass.
Service item 2
t_requisitionsrvaccass-pckg_no = '0000000002'.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-line_no = 3.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-serno_line = '01'.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-quantity = '10'
t_requisitionsrvaccass-serial_no = '02'
APPEND t_requisitionsrvaccass.
*<b>PR item 20</b>
Service item 1
t_requisitionsrvaccass-pckg_no = '0000000004'.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-line_no = 2. " line 1 is the header for service
t_requisitionsrvaccass-serno_line = '01'.
t_requisitionsrvaccass-quantity = '10'
t_requisitionsrvaccass-serial_no = '01'
APPEND t_requisitionsrvaccass.
With this code, what I get is the blank account assignment for PR item 10 and correctly filled account assignment for PR item 20.
Does anyone done this before and can give me some help. Thanks.

Hi, can you send me an example of this BAPI.
I have the same requeriment, i'm new with bapis
thanks

PO with hundreds of multiple account assignment lines on service line level

Hi, experts,
I want to create a external service PO with multiple account assignment.
However, in the service line item level, when I click on the multiple account assignment, I could only enter 97 lines. But I need to create around 1000 account assignment lines for a single service line.
Is it possible to extend the no. of account assignment lines inside the service line level? May I know how to do so?
Thanks & regards,
James

I'm facing a similar error.
What I think it's happening is that for technical reasons the program involved only delivers 99 line items... To make things worse, When you try to create an invoice for that full item you are going to get an error bc the invoice reserves line 99 for unplanned account assignments.
The suggestion from SAP is to create further items with 98 account assignment items or less.
Have a look at these notes: 486808, 651784
Regards,
Nelson
PS: Please rewards points for helpful answers

Multiple Account Assignment details for Service PRs

Hi,
       I have developed a RFC for creating PRs. For multiple service PRs, multiple services are getting created but account assignment details getting created only for the first service line item. Iu2019m using BAPI_REQUISISTION_CREATE. Please provide me a solution.
Regards,
N.Senthil

hi all,
      the issue has been resolved by passing the below mentioned values.
      wa_item_data-distrib = '1'.      "FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT based on the quanlity
      wa_item_data-part_inv = '1'.     "FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT
solution got from
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE
http://www.sapnet.ru/viewtopic.php?p=9306
Regards,
N.Senthil

MIGO in case of multiple account assignment.

Hi,
I have created PO with multiple account assignment. AAC is P.
While doing MIGO, FI document is not getting generated.
Can anyone plz explain how multiple account assignment functionality works?
Regards
Nilesh

Hi
Its a standard practice that if there is multiple account assignment, the proportion will not be appearing at the time of MIGO. It will get updated only at the time of Invoice verification.
Regards,
Lakshmanan Krishnan

GR Printing For Single Line Item With Multiple Account Assignment.

Hi All,
There is PO for projects (Account Assignment -P - Network) in which in a single item consist of multiple account assignment.
Noe while entering the GR I select "Collective Slip" option but when the GR is posted system automatically select option "Individual slip" and seprate line item are printed for each account assignment.
The printing program is standard SAPM07DR. The SAP version is 4.7. Can anyone tell what is ther any setting in configuration or is it problem in program or smart form
Thanks & Regards,
Omkar

hi
please check your form and routine used to print.

Multiple Account Assignment Distribution by Percentage in EBP

Hi Gurus,
We are in SRM 4 SP13 and ECC 4.6C ,Classic Scenario.The SC creates a PR in the backend and from that PO subsequently.
When we are creating a SC with Multiple Account Assignment and Distribution by Percentage to different cost centres   the PR created with
Distribution : Distribution by percentage and
Partial Invoice : Distribute in Sequence. This is for materials
But for Services it is created as
Distribution : Distribution by percentage and
Partial Invoice :Distribute Proportionally.
For services Partial Invoice is working fine and for materials it is Picking "Distribute in Sequence"
Is this a standard behaviour or any thing to be changed .Please let me know.
Thanks in Advance.
Rajesh

Hi there,
Standard SRM Hardcodes the partial invoice indicator to Progressive when
sending POs to SAP in the Classice Scenario:
SPOOL_PO_READ_BAPI_EXPORTS hard codes the value of po_items-part_inv
to 1 that is equivalent to "Progressive fill-up" in R/3 POs & REQ.
It is not possible to create from EBP to backend some PO-documents with
multiple account assignment and partial invoice indicator = 2 (which is
proportional distribution because there is no possibility to set this
indicator on the account assignment creen in EBP and theris no Badi
to do it so far. This is a missing functionality from SAP.
You still could use LIV with partial invoice indicator= 1 and then you
can change to partial invoice propotional in backend manually.
This is not comfortable but it is possible so far.
You can see in the following code from the mentioned Function how Service and material documents are treated differently
======================================
set distr. indicator only for the dummy item for services
for material items and the service lines
it is derived from distribution type in EBP
    IF next > 1.
      IF po_items-item_cat = '9' OR
         po_items-item_cat = '1' .
        po_items-distrib = '2'.    "prozentuale Verteilung
      ENDIF.
      po_items-part_inv = '1'.      <<<<       Hard Coded to "1"
      MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.
    ELSE.
      CLEAR po_items-distrib.    "prozentuale Verteilung
      MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
CHECK NOT po_items[] IS INITIAL.
======================================
Or possibly use Badi BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK
Hope this points you in the right direction.
Regards,
Matthew

Multiple account assignment for asset

Hi,
I had created PO with multiple account assignment for asset. PO is created with one line item having 5 qty and in multiple account assignment 5 assets are entered with qty distribution.
I have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post migo(GR) the value is posting for only first one asset not for all.
So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
Reagrds,
Umesh
Edited by: Umesh Agrawal on May 15, 2009 6:43 AM

Hi,
1st check in OME9 t.code for account assignment A, the selection of 2(Multiple account ***)in field ID: AcctAssgt Scrn and Distribution field as 1.
Then during PO creation for single line item & in Item details TAB, in account assignment segment, you enter qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep qty. with asset number(A1) with G/L account ( different G/L Account) OR enter qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep qty. with another asset number(A2) with G/L account (different G/L Account)
####Example-1: in account assignment segment , if you have
G/L account----
Asset
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
12346u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
12347u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
12348u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
Vendor A/C: Cr
G/L account (12345): Dr
G/L account (12346): Dr
G/L account (12347): Dr
G/L account (12348 ):Dr
#####Example-2: in account assignment segment , if you have
G/L account----
Asset
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
Vendor A/C: Cr
G/L account (12345): Dr
Regards,
Biju K

Multiple Account assignment in PO cause no GR value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for