Multiple account assignment in purchase requisition

hi,
when we are using multiple account assignment in purchase requisition we are getting following messege:
error 1 : "Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set for multi acct. assgt."
error 2 : "Multi acct. assgt. not allowed for ind. cust. req. or engineer-to-order"
please suggest if i need to change configuration...
thanks,
shreya

hi,
error 1 : "Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set for multi acct. assgt."
OME9- change the options other than nil, in distribution and partial invoice option, according to the requirement
error 2 : "Multi acct. assgt. not allowed for ind. cust. req. or engineer-to-order"
-can u check the system messages.
(seems u r using M account assignment)
OME9- activating the multiple account setting, and other fields depends on your business requirement.
Edited by: Suresh Shenoy on Jan 29, 2008 6:27 AM

Similar Messages

  • Multiple Account Assignment In Purchase Order

    I've found something about multiple account assingment. If i have multiple assignment i can't have valued receipt, but if i desable the flag i have no message. Can I set a material to force to enable GR indicator and force to disable GR indicator?

    When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
    As for second part No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category.

  • Account Assignment in Purchase Requistion/Order

    Hi All,
    Could you please help us where to configure error message if account assignment in purchase requisition or order does not align with the configuration of G/L field status group?
    Scenario during PR/PO creation:
    1. Account assignment is F(CC and IO required) and G/L field status group is CC required only - the system trigger an error message which is correct.
    2. But if account assignment is K(CC required only) and G/L field status group is CC and IO required - the system does not trigger any error message.
    Is there a way so PR/PO creation won't proceed if account assignment is incorrect vs G/L FSG?
    Thank you.
    Jesielle

    Jesielle,
    The system does trigger a message in both PO and PR based on the field status group in the GL account. The only thing you need to do is change the status of the field in OME9 to anything other than 'hidden'.
    Please see the screenshots below, maybe they'll help you:
    FS00
    OME9 for K:
    ME51N:

  • Multiple Account Assignments for purchase/framework requisition

    Hi,
    Multiple Account Assignments for purchase/framework requisition:
    The actual MM configuration is a single account assignment in the purchase requisition (although the option of multiple account assignments exist for trips). What are the implications at GR posting? Assuming that we could use the option for quantity and percentage distribution.
    Regards
    Suresh

    Hi
    Multiple account assignment:
    <b>Specifying Multiple Account Assignment</b>
    This procedure allows you to apportion the costs associated with a PR/PO item (among several cost centers, for example).
    With multiple account assignment, the account assignment data entered takes the form of individual account assignment items.
    <b>Prerequisites</b>
    When specifying multiple account assignment for an item, you must consider the following points:
    1.How is the net value of a PO item to be distributed (apportioned) among the individual account assignment items?
    The costs can be allocated on a quantity or percentage basis (for example, 10 pieces or 10% of the order value to cost center 100).
    2.How are the costs to be apportioned if only a part of the ordered quantity has been delivered and invoiced?
    The partial invoice amount can be distributed proportionally, i.e. evenly, among the account assignment items of a purchase order.
    The partial invoice amount can be distributed on a "progressive fill-up" basis, i.e. the invoiced amount is allocated to the individual account assignment items one after the other. Only when account assignment item 1 has been charged in full is item 2 charged; only when account assignment item 2 has been charged is item 3 charged, and so on. This process continues until the total invoice value of the PO item is reached.
    <b>Procedure</b>
    1.When entering an item, specify the account assignment category for the desired item on the item overview screen.
    2.Choose Item -> Account assignments.
    The account assignment window appears.
    3.Enter the account assignment data for the first account assignment item.
    Choose Change display to call up the multiple account assignment screen.
    4.In the item fields (upper part of this screen) enter the relevant data:
    – Select the GR non-val. field to designate the GR for this item as non-valuated (as the item has been ordered for direct consumption).
    – In the Distribution field, specify whether the costs are to be apportioned on a quantity basis or by percentage.
    – In the Partial invoice field, specify whether the value of a partial invoice is to be allocated to individual account assignment items successively, whereby one is debited in full before a posting is made to another one (in which case, some account assignment items may not be debited at all as a result of a particular invoice), or whether the value of such a partial invoice is to be distributed among all account assignment items in equal portions.
    5.For each account assignment item, enter either the quantity or the percentage of the total value to be charged to the relevant account assignment item.
    To enter further items with the same account assignment data, choose Edit -> Repeat account assignment -> Switch on. The account assignment data will then be automatically adopted in the next item.
    6.Repeat as necessary for other items.
    7.Save the purchase order.
    A vendor submits an invoice for 60% of the total order value. The cost of the ordered goods is to be divided equally among cost centers 1 - 5 (that is, 20% of the total cost is to be borne by each).
    If you specified for the PO item that the value of a partial invoice is to be debited to the individual account assignment items on a "progressive fill-up" basis, cost centers 1 to 3 will each be debited with their full 20% share of the total cost on the basis of this partial invoice, whereas cost centers 4 and 5 will not be charged at all. (The latter two cost centers will not be debited until the remaining amount is invoiced.)
    Regards
    Ramakrishna

  • 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'  Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS item

    'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'  -> This BAPI works perfectly without the  'account assignment' option . But  for purchase requisitions which have account assignments  BAPI returns the error  - E|8W |185   |Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS items.
    Can somebody please help me to get this error resoleve .
    My coding I have done like below.
    DATA: pohead  TYPE bapimepoheader.
    DATA: poheadx TYPE bapimepoheaderx.
    CONSTANTS : c_x VALUE 'X'.
    DATA: exp_head TYPE bapimepoheader.
    DATA: return  TYPE TABLE OF bapiret2 WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: poitem  TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitem WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: poitemx TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitemx WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: posched  TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedule WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: poschedx TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedulx WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: POACCOUNT  TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNT WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: POACCOUNTX TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNTx WITH HEADER LINE.
      pohead-comp_code = '1000'.   "IEQ1 plant. "'1000'.
      pohead-doc_type   = 'NB'     .
      pohead-creat_date = sy-datum   .
      pohead-vendor = EKKO-LIFNR. "'0000500004'.
      pohead-purch_org = purch_org.
      pohead-pur_group = purch_grp.
      pohead-langu      = sy-langu   .
      pohead-doc_date   = sy-datum.
      poheadx-comp_code  = c_x.
      poheadx-doc_type   = c_x.
      poheadx-creat_date = c_x.
      poheadx-vendor     = c_x.
      poheadx-langu      = c_x.
      poheadx-purch_org  = c_x.
      poheadx-pur_group  = c_x.
      poheadx-doc_date   = c_x.
      poitem-po_item    = iLineItem.      "1.
      poitem-material   = req_item-MATERIAL.   " '000000000040000234'.
      poitem-plant      = req_item-PLANT.
      poitem-quantity   = req_item-QUANTITY.
      poitem-net_price  = NET_PRICE.
      poitem-price_unit = PRICE_UNIT.
      poitem-shipping   = 'Z1'.
      poitem-preq_no    = req_item-PREQ_NO.
      poitem-preq_item  = req_item-PREQ_ITEM.
      poitem-acctasscat = 'K'.
      APPEND poitem.
      poitemx-po_item    = iLineItem. "1.
      poitemx-po_itemx   = c_x.
      poitemx-material   = c_x.
      poitemx-plant      = c_x .
      poitemx-quantity   = c_x .
      poitemx-tax_code   = c_x .
      poitemx-item_cat   = c_x .
      poitemx-acctasscat = c_x .
      poitemx-net_price  = c_x.
      poitemx-price_unit = c_x.
      poitemx-shipping   = c_x.
      poitemx-preq_no    = c_x.
      poitemx-preq_item  = c_x.
      poitemx-acctasscat = c_x.
      APPEND poitemx.
      POACCOUNT-PO_ITEM = iLineItem.
      POACCOUNT-SERIAL_NO = iLineItem.
      POACCOUNT-GL_ACCOUNT = '0000211010'.
      POACCOUNT-SD_DOC = '0001001056'.       
      POACCOUNT-ITM_NUMBER = '000100'.       
      POACCOUNT-CO_AREA = '1000'.
      APPEND POACCOUNT.
      POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEM = '00001'.
      POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NO = '01'." '01'.
      POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEMX = 'X'.
      POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NOX = 'X'.
      POACCOUNTX-GL_ACCOUNT = 'X'.
      POACCOUNTX-SD_DOC = 'X'.
      POACCOUNTX-ITM_NUMBER = 'X'.
      APPEND POACCOUNTX.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'
        EXPORTING
          poheader  = pohead
          poheaderx = poheadx
        IMPORTING
        exppurchaseorder = ex_po_number
        expheader        = exp_head
        TABLES
          return    = return
          poitem    = poitem
          poitemx   = poitemx
          POACCOUNT = POACCOUNT
          POACCOUNTX = POACCOUNTX.

    I  found the answer

  • Down payment with multiple account assignment PO

    Dear Experts,
    While posting down payment request through transaction F -47 with
    reference to purchase order we are getting below given error.
    In that purchase order we have given
    multiple account assignment i.e. multiple cost centers (e.g. Cost center A  50% cost center B 10% Cost Center  C 40% i.e. distribution by %)
    but
    system is flagging message
    Item 00010 of purch. document 4500024875 contains no suitable account
    assignment
    Message no. ME717
    What will be the possible cause?
    regards,
    Abhijit

    Hi,
    In the request f-27 tr.code give the purchase order which item you want to give ie., for above said example 10 is a line item of 4500024875 - purchase order and beside you have to mention
    10(lineitem) 4500024875 (purchase order) 2009 (year)
    and system will take that request against the above purchase order.
    Regards,
    satish

  • Setting Default Values in PO - Multiple Account Assignment

    Hello Experts,
    How do we set defalut values for the Field "Partial Invoice" in the Account Assignment Tab(Multiple Acc Assignment) of Purchase Order/Purchase Requisistion.
    This field is  not available in Personal settings of "PO Item", also there is no "Parameter ID" available for this field.
    Regards,
    Hemant Kumar B

    Hi,
    The suggestion provided was useful, but it is a client level setting. Is there a way to have the value for the field defaulted as a user setting.
    Regards,
    Hemant Kumar B

  • Multiple account assignment for asset

    Hi,
    I had created PO with multiple account assignment for asset. PO is created with one line item having 5 qty and in multiple account assignment 5 assets are entered with qty distribution.
    I have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post migo(GR) the value is posting for only first one asset not for all.
    So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
    Reagrds,
    Umesh
    Edited by: Umesh Agrawal on May 15, 2009 6:43 AM

    Hi,
    1st check in OME9 t.code for account assignment A, the selection of 2(Multiple account ***)in field ID: AcctAssgt Scrn and Distribution field as 1.
    Then during PO creation for single line item  & in Item details TAB, in account assignment segment, you enter qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep  qty. with asset number(A1) with  G/L account ( different G/L Account) OR enter  qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep  qty. with another asset number(A2) with  G/L account (different G/L Account)
    ####Example-1: in account assignment segment     , if you have
    G/L account----
    Asset
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
    12346u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
    12347u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
    12348u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
    Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
    Vendor A/C: Cr
    G/L account (12345): Dr
    G/L account (12346): Dr
    G/L account (12347): Dr
    G/L account (12348 ):Dr
    #####Example-2: in account assignment segment     , if you have
    G/L account----
    Asset
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
    Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
    Vendor A/C: Cr
    G/L account (12345): Dr
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Multiple Account Assignment in Service PO and Seq No of Acc Assgnmt in FI

    Hi Experts,
    We have created a Service PO with Multiple Account Assignment.  The issue is Seq. No. Acc. ***. in BSEG-ZEKKN is showing as 01 for the line item.  But in EKKN-ZEKKN for the same line item is showing as 02.  Is it that the Sequence Number of Account Assignment in table EKKN and field ZEKKN flow to ZEKKN field in BSEG?
    Or is that BSEG-ZEKKN is posted from FI Document itself?  Can anybody explain the logic?

    BSEG - ZEKKN field is always defaulted to 1 in FI document, unless you manually override and change it to something else. Since all FI documents are with reference to purchase order and line item, system cannot determine automatically the sequential number of account assignment which needs to be entered for a particular combination of PO and line item in the FI document.
    So it is always defaulted as 1 and does not flow from Purchase order to FI document. Infact the field I believe is displayed only in case of transactions like downpayments which require the account assignment in addition to PO and line item. For all others , if there is an account assignment sequence then it is defaulted as 1.
    Also see OSS note 204252 which mentions that for multiple account assignments within the same PO and line item no FI documents get generated.
    Thanks

  • MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT IN SERVICE PO

    Hello Experts,
       I've created service PO with multiple account assignment. This PO contains manually entered condition at header level.Issue is that for multiple A/C assignment, I'm getting message " No delivery Cost can be posted in case of multiple A/C assignment." due  to which A/C document doesn't showing any delivery cost.
      If I make single A/C assign. then delivery cost is getting posted seperately. I want to know IMG settings reqd. to overcome this. I've made "del. costs seperate post" tick in IMG>>MM>> purchasing>>A/C Assignment>>Maintain A/C assign. cat.>> K Cost Centre, but still getting same error. So tell me any addn. settings reqd. for this.
      Thanks in Advance
            Amit

    Hi,
    This is a standard SAP functionality.
    In Case of multiple account assignment no delivery cost posted at the time of goods/service Receipt.
    The accounting documents are posted at the time of MIRO.
    Please do the MIRO and then check.

  • Valuated GR with Multiple Account Assignment

    Hi SAP Experts!
    I would want to know the logic behind always using a Non-valuated GRs with Multiple Account Assignments.
    I am asking this because we would want to make use of the budget checking during GRs. More specifically, whenever there is a GR, the committed budget will move to the actual budget. In our business practice, more often than not, the invoice is entered much later than the GR. This would mean that the amount of the purchase will remain in the committed state even if the goods have already been received.
    Is there a way to work around this in SAP? Or is this the only way that it does this?
    Hope to hear from you guys soon. Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    I am sorry but the basic process is that you cannopt have a valuated receipt for a line with multiple account assignments.
    An alternative (albeit a not very good one) is to just use separate lines on the PO instead of multiple account assignment.
    this may not be any help, but I doubt if there are any user-friendly alternatives.
    Steve B

  • Services with multiple account assignment.

    Hi all,
    How can I find out the POs which are having the multiple account assignment for the service line items from tables ?
    I am looking for services with multiple account assignments
    Regards

    Hi
    Go to SE16 , give table name -EKPO
    Now if you have purchase order nos with you then copy paste the PO numbers here , or select company code or site to restrict your entries. It will control the performance of the data execution.
    Then execute this (remove max no 200 ) . Go to Settings-- Format List -- Choose fields. Deselect all and select fields as per your requirement.If field names are coming in technical names you can change this via settings--User parameter and select -Field Label.
    You can extract this report to excel as well. Same PO number with all account assignment category.
    Please note if you have high volume of data then extract all the POs under service orders first from EKKO table and copy all the service PO numbers availbvale and paste in table EKPO, it will increase performance as well.
    Cheers
    Mukta

  • Undeleting a PO line item with multiple account assignment and PO history

    I  am getting error message
    PO history already exists (Multiple account assignment not possible)
        Message no. MEPO841
    When attempting to undelete a purchase order line item that has GR (nonvaluated) and Invoice postings.
    Sequence of events.
    PO line item was created with mutlitple account assignments ( 50/50 distribution) and GR nonval flags on.
    Invoice Posted (blocked for payment)
    GR done
    PO line item marked for deletion.
    Now getting MEPO841 when attempting to undelete.
    Tried to Reverse GR and cancel material docuement - unable to do so - message no selectable items in PO
      (even with check zero indicator )

    Hello Dan ,
    Error message MEPO 841 is only issued if you have Multiple account assignment function (MAA) activated. Multiple account assignment function is a new business function developed in Release 604.
    If you have MAA active, you are not allowed to change a single account assigned PO which has GR posted to a multiple accounts assigned PO. If this is tried , MEPO 841 will stop you from doing this change.
    If you want to have your old functionality in the lower release, you should switch off the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 ( MM Multiple Account Assignment )  in Release 604.
    Please switch the business function LOG_MM_MAA_1 off in test environment  and test the problem again in a productive system.
    I hope this information has been helpful in solving your problem. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
    Thank you.
    Best Regards,
    Frank Farinella

  • Limti PO with Multiple account assignment Problem

    Hi,
    Can we create limit PO with Multiple account assignment.
    If yes, i have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post service entry sheet the value is posting for only first one cost centre/Order but not all.
    So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
    Reagrds,
    JM

    Hi Summer,
    We have implemented SAP Note 1165524 for multiple account assignment as suggested, and it is working fine for New POs.
    But we have old Purchase order which still have wrong commitment, and GR and IR are already posted for this PO, we have to reduce the commitment to Zero.
    there is one solution for this is set  'No further Invoice expected' check box selected in this PO, but in our case PO  went into error in process after doing this.
    Please help me to reduce commitment to zero for this old PO
    Thanks in advance
    Vikas

  • PO with multiple account assignment

    Hi Experts,
    While creating PO for multiple account assignment system is automatically picking 'GR Non-Valuated' check box.After doing a GR no accouning document generated.
    How is the goods receipt valuated for a purchase order with multiple account assignment?
    Please explain.
    Thanks,
    Sanjana

    Hi,
    It is possible to create PO with multiple account assignment,but you will not get accounting document at the time of GR.it will happen at the time of MIRO,as i have allready explained.
    If you will create PO with multiple account assignment for Services,System will generate Accounting document at the time of GR.
    I hope it will clerify.
    Regards,
    Manish

Maybe you are looking for

  • Red Footage and Final Cut Server

    Aloha gang- I am still testing FCS in our studio and enjoy many of the features in this product. I love being able to search for footage and pull it into my FCP project with no waiting (using edit-in-place). But I am looking for some advice and knowl

  • How to create a sql server database in SQL DEVELOPER.

    I installed the SQL DEVELOPER 1.5.5, but i can't found where to create the sql server database in it. please kindly tell me if you feel free. Thanks so much in advance.

  • Problem with pages containing Facebook links

    At the school where I teach, Facebook and other social networking sites are blocked by the school's server. Any time I open a web page in Safari containing a link to Facebook, I get a pop-up, which I immediately dismiss. This can happen dozens of tim

  • Problem when Nano connected to USB at Boot for PC

    I have a Nano 4GB than for some strange reason, when plugged into a USB port (2.0), frequently causes the computer to either delay the boot process (~ 1 min+) or (rarely) cause the computer to reboot during the device initialization process. If I unp

  • Cannot install x11 for ies4osx download

    I need to get IE v6.0 or greater to work with a certain website(MLS) and found this program ies4osx. To download it I must first install X11 from the Tiger Installation DVD. I installed the 'xcodetools.mpkg' and then the x11SDK.pkg from the Packages