Multiple account assignment switching between distribution indicators not working for service
Hi Gurus,
Account assignment distribution function not working post ECC6 patching activity
we have recently completed ECC6 patching actvity and we are facing issues on processing multiple account assignment in service.
we create Purhcase order with single account assignment and will process service with Multiple account assignment selecting distribution on qty or percentage basis till patching functionality works fine post patching we are facing issue when we are selecting distribution indicator system provides an error message switching between distribution indicator is not allowed when we continue system ask to enter in case of multiple account assignment select the distribution indicator. could you please suggest me on the issue.
Thanks in advance.
we have found a SAP note
1915000 - SE685 - Switching between distribution indicators is not allowed
This is now standard behavior.
Similar Messages
-
Multiple Account assignment with cost distribution value error
Hello Experts,
We are facing the below issue,
We are trying to create Limit SC with MAA cost center with cost distribution "By Value". we distribute the total value to 5 cost centers. when we try to order the SC, system is not allowing us to order, we got the error message "Multiple account assignment only with percentage less than 100%".
Please advise how to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Santhosh Kumar.GHi
Check this OSS notes : 1644804
Regards
G.Ganesh Kumar -
Multiple Account Assignment at the time of Good Receipt for one line item
Sap Members.
We have some contracts with cost center distributions that the exact amount is not known. These Blanket Orders require a receiving confirmation.then only we can conclude the cost center, If we create one line item with total amount of contract to one cost center, is there a way can we distribute this cost to the different cost centers at the moment receiving the goods
Any help will be highly appreciated.
Thanks
NickPlease Check SAP Notes - Oss Notes
With multiple acct. assignment, enter GR non-val. or cancel GR
Message no. 06417
Diagnosis
In the case of PO items assigned to more than one account, instead of valuation being carried out at the time of goods receipt, the relevant materials are not valuated until the invoice data is entered into the system.
Procedure
Set the indicator for non-valuated goods receipts
or
Cancel the GR indicator.
OSS-Notes. -
Version: 5 -
Validity: valid since 12.04.2007
Note 204252 - Valuated goods receipt for multiple account assignment
Summary
Symptom
You cannot use the valuated goods receipt function in combination with multiple account assignment.
Other terms
EKPO-WEUNB, screen 0113, ME21, purchase order, 06417, 06 417
Reason and Prerequisites
We have not implemented this function since users who post goods receipts would have to determine the distribution to individual account assignment items during partial deliveries. Generally, users cannot or should not determine this.
An automatic distribution also causes problems and is also not implemented due to technical reasons -
Assign Source of supply is not working for contract with material group
Dear Experts,
I have searched all the threads and gone through before posting my query. So i would ask moderators to go through the thread properly before rejecting this.
We have value contracts with respect to a particular material group without material and with item category W in the contract item, Please note that for the materials with this material group, the source determination is not set and source list is also not maintained.
When we create PR for the material with this contract, and when we click on assign source of supply contracts used to get popped up, but recently from few days, when we click on assign source of supply we are getting an error " no source found for this item ".
Can anybody help on this.
Regards@ Biju,
As mentioned earlier, we are not creating PR with reference to contract.
first we are creating contract with item category W (material group), without material and plant details.
we create PR with or without material with account assignment K and with the material group in the transaction ME51N, and after inputting all the fields, we click on assign source of supply, it was proposing the existing contracts with respect to material group earlier, but it is not happening for particular material group(it is working for all other material groups)
Hope it is clear.
@ Dev Patra,
we are using DIEN-Service material types and we assign that particular material group to only service material type.
we have not ticked, source list in the material master, we donot have any source list for the materials under that material group.( please check the note 457110- question number 14.)
Regards -
Linking between pages is not working for me on mobile devices. Can someone help?
I can get the page linking to work on my desktop machine, but when I preview on mobile devices through Edge Inspect the page does not work. It tells me the page can't be found. Can someone help? - Thanks Robin
Try downloading Reflow Preview 8 that was released yesterday and see if that fixes it. If not can you post the name of the page you are trying to link too and I'll see if I can reproduce it.
Thanks for you help and thanks for using Reflow,
Chris -
They were working up until today and I didn't update anything and my trackpad is still working otherwise.
I've tried looking in the Preferences menu, which had nothing that could help me.
PS In 10.6, there is a Kotoeri preferences box at the bottom of the first tab called "Show Predicted Candidates". Is this checked for you? (I think in 10.4 this is still in Japanese and might be different). In the third tab, there is also a setting related to the number of conversions. And in the last two tabs there are dictionaries that can be either open or closed. I gather you have tried all of these without success? -
Between clause is not working for me
my query does not give me the right output. when I use 1-12-2008 for min value and 11-12-2008 for max value. I was supposed to get result only for year 2008 but i am getting the result that includes year 2000,2001.....any idea why i am not getting the right result?
thanks
SELECT v.vendor "Vendor Id", r.addrnum, v.vnamel "Vendor Name", r.aaddr1,
r.acity, r.vasst1, r.astate state, r.azipcode,
TO_CHAR (MAX (p.datepur), 'MM/DD/YYYY') "Last Plan Purchased Date",
TO_CHAR (MAX (p.datepur), 'YYYY/MM/DD') "Plan Purchased Date",
TRIM (r.aaddr1 || DECODE (TRIM (r.aaddr2), NULL, '', ' - ')
|| r.aaddr2
) address,
SUBSTR (DECODE (TRIM (r.vasst1),
NULL, 'N/A',
'000/000-0000?', 'N/A',
'000/000-0000', 'N/A',
r.vasst1
1,
12
) fax,
SUBSTR (DECODE (TRIM (r.aphone),
NULL, 'N/A',
'000/000-0000?', 'N/A',
r.aphone
1,
12
) phone
FROM vendor v, vendaddr r, planhold p
WHERE v.vendor = r.vendor
AND p.vendor = r.vendor
-- AND (p.datepur >= TO_DATE ('01-01-2000', 'MM-DD-YYYY'))
AND p.datepur IN (SELECT MAX (p.datepur)
FROM planhold p
WHERE p.vendor = r.vendor)
AND v.vobsolet = 'N'
AND v.vnamel LIKE '%'
AND r.astate LIKE '%'
--minvalue and max value test
AND (TO_CHAR (p.datepur, 'MM-DD-YYYY') BETWEEN '&MINVALUE' AND '&MAXVALUE')
GROUP BY v.vendor,
r.addrnum,
v.vnamel,
r.aaddr1,
r.aaddr2,
r.acity,
r.astate,
r.azipcode,
r.aphone,
r.vasst1,
p.datepurYou are comparing dates as strings. You need to compare dates as dates.
AND (TO_CHAR (p.datepur, 'MM-DD-YYYY') BETWEEN '&MINVALUE' AND '&MAXVALUE')
Should be:
AND (p.datepur BETWEEN to_date('&MINVALUE', 'MM-DD-YYYY') AND to_date('&MAXVALUE', 'MM-DD-YYYY'))
If you compare them as strings, then:
'10-20-2001'
is between '10-10-2008' and '10-30-2009', alphabetically. -
Limti PO with Multiple account assignment Problem
Hi,
Can we create limit PO with Multiple account assignment.
If yes, i have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post service entry sheet the value is posting for only first one cost centre/Order but not all.
So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
Reagrds,
JMHi Summer,
We have implemented SAP Note 1165524 for multiple account assignment as suggested, and it is working fine for New POs.
But we have old Purchase order which still have wrong commitment, and GR and IR are already posted for this PO, we have to reduce the commitment to Zero.
there is one solution for this is set 'No further Invoice expected' check box selected in this PO, but in our case PO went into error in process after doing this.
Please help me to reduce commitment to zero for this old PO
Thanks in advance
Vikas -
Multiple account assignment in Pr
i see the that we can mention a single material to multiple account assignment category in Pr.
when i try for this i goe message that it requires customization of multiple account assignment with G/L.
where to do this.Follow Path in IMG- MM--> Purchasing > Account assignment>Maintain account assign category
For your Account assignment X, or K Chage setting under field ID: AcctAssgt Scrn - 2 Multiple account assignment from 1.
Thanks,
Ram -
Multiple Account Assignment Distribution by Percentage in EBP
Hi Gurus,
We are in SRM 4 SP13 and ECC 4.6C ,Classic Scenario.The SC creates a PR in the backend and from that PO subsequently.
When we are creating a SC with Multiple Account Assignment and Distribution by Percentage to different cost centres the PR created with
Distribution : Distribution by percentage and
Partial Invoice : Distribute in Sequence. This is for materials
But for Services it is created as
Distribution : Distribution by percentage and
Partial Invoice :Distribute Proportionally.
For services Partial Invoice is working fine and for materials it is Picking "Distribute in Sequence"
Is this a standard behaviour or any thing to be changed .Please let me know.
Thanks in Advance.
RajeshHi there,
Standard SRM Hardcodes the partial invoice indicator to Progressive when
sending POs to SAP in the Classice Scenario:
SPOOL_PO_READ_BAPI_EXPORTS hard codes the value of po_items-part_inv
to 1 that is equivalent to "Progressive fill-up" in R/3 POs & REQ.
It is not possible to create from EBP to backend some PO-documents with
multiple account assignment and partial invoice indicator = 2 (which is
proportional distribution because there is no possibility to set this
indicator on the account assignment creen in EBP and theris no Badi
to do it so far. This is a missing functionality from SAP.
You still could use LIV with partial invoice indicator= 1 and then you
can change to partial invoice propotional in backend manually.
This is not comfortable but it is possible so far.
You can see in the following code from the mentioned Function how Service and material documents are treated differently
======================================
set distr. indicator only for the dummy item for services
for material items and the service lines
it is derived from distribution type in EBP
IF next > 1.
IF po_items-item_cat = '9' OR
po_items-item_cat = '1' .
po_items-distrib = '2'. "prozentuale Verteilung
ENDIF.
po_items-part_inv = '1'. <<<< Hard Coded to "1"
MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.
ELSE.
CLEAR po_items-distrib. "prozentuale Verteilung
MODIFY po_items INDEX h_index.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
CHECK NOT po_items[] IS INITIAL.
======================================
Or possibly use Badi BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK
Hope this points you in the right direction.
Regards,
Matthew -
'BAPI_PO_CREATE1' Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS item
'BAPI_PO_CREATE1' -> This BAPI works perfectly without the 'account assignment' option . But for purchase requisitions which have account assignments BAPI returns the error - E|8W |185 |Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS items.
Can somebody please help me to get this error resoleve .
My coding I have done like below.
DATA: pohead TYPE bapimepoheader.
DATA: poheadx TYPE bapimepoheaderx.
CONSTANTS : c_x VALUE 'X'.
DATA: exp_head TYPE bapimepoheader.
DATA: return TYPE TABLE OF bapiret2 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: poitem TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitem WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: poitemx TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitemx WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: posched TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedule WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: poschedx TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedulx WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: POACCOUNT TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNT WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: POACCOUNTX TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNTx WITH HEADER LINE.
pohead-comp_code = '1000'. "IEQ1 plant. "'1000'.
pohead-doc_type = 'NB' .
pohead-creat_date = sy-datum .
pohead-vendor = EKKO-LIFNR. "'0000500004'.
pohead-purch_org = purch_org.
pohead-pur_group = purch_grp.
pohead-langu = sy-langu .
pohead-doc_date = sy-datum.
poheadx-comp_code = c_x.
poheadx-doc_type = c_x.
poheadx-creat_date = c_x.
poheadx-vendor = c_x.
poheadx-langu = c_x.
poheadx-purch_org = c_x.
poheadx-pur_group = c_x.
poheadx-doc_date = c_x.
poitem-po_item = iLineItem. "1.
poitem-material = req_item-MATERIAL. " '000000000040000234'.
poitem-plant = req_item-PLANT.
poitem-quantity = req_item-QUANTITY.
poitem-net_price = NET_PRICE.
poitem-price_unit = PRICE_UNIT.
poitem-shipping = 'Z1'.
poitem-preq_no = req_item-PREQ_NO.
poitem-preq_item = req_item-PREQ_ITEM.
poitem-acctasscat = 'K'.
APPEND poitem.
poitemx-po_item = iLineItem. "1.
poitemx-po_itemx = c_x.
poitemx-material = c_x.
poitemx-plant = c_x .
poitemx-quantity = c_x .
poitemx-tax_code = c_x .
poitemx-item_cat = c_x .
poitemx-acctasscat = c_x .
poitemx-net_price = c_x.
poitemx-price_unit = c_x.
poitemx-shipping = c_x.
poitemx-preq_no = c_x.
poitemx-preq_item = c_x.
poitemx-acctasscat = c_x.
APPEND poitemx.
POACCOUNT-PO_ITEM = iLineItem.
POACCOUNT-SERIAL_NO = iLineItem.
POACCOUNT-GL_ACCOUNT = '0000211010'.
POACCOUNT-SD_DOC = '0001001056'.
POACCOUNT-ITM_NUMBER = '000100'.
POACCOUNT-CO_AREA = '1000'.
APPEND POACCOUNT.
POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEM = '00001'.
POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NO = '01'." '01'.
POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEMX = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NOX = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-GL_ACCOUNT = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-SD_DOC = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-ITM_NUMBER = 'X'.
APPEND POACCOUNTX.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'
EXPORTING
poheader = pohead
poheaderx = poheadx
IMPORTING
exppurchaseorder = ex_po_number
expheader = exp_head
TABLES
return = return
poitem = poitem
poitemx = poitemx
POACCOUNT = POACCOUNT
POACCOUNTX = POACCOUNTX.I found the answer
-
Valuated GR not allowed in case of multiple account assignment
Hi Friends,
While creating Asset PO with multiple account assignment categories from SC
i received the following error message in RZ20.
PO 0030065837: No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference:
PurchOrder 0030065837: Purchase order still contains faulty items
PO 0030065837: Valuated GR not allowed in case of multiple accoun t assignment
PurchOrder 0030065837: Transfer failed
Now the PO status is error in process
Can any one help on this issue...
Thank You
ShrinivasHi shrinivas,
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP
can you tell me whether you have that option of selecting or deselecting the GR nonvaluated in PO creation(EBP).If it is there falg it and reprocess the Sc
hope this will help
regards
subbu -
Multiple Account Assignment -- Distribution
Hi,
Details:
SRM 4.0 system.
SRM SERVER 500
when filling in the multiple account assignment, the user can choose the distribution type (percentage, value, quantity). We don't want the users to select a distribution by value. So is it possible to remove this option from the drop down box?
Best Regards,
TomHi Tom,
You can change it in program LBBP_PDH_ACCF35.
Here you can see text-024 (value) is appended to the table.
Just comment this table append.
Best regards,
Laurent. -
Multiple account assignment for distribution of freight cost in MIRO Transaction
Hi MM Gurus
I have created one Purchase order with multiple account assignment for Asset 'A' in which freight cost is added.
I have done good receipt in which only material document is generated. (No financial document generated).
While doing the MIRO for the same Purchase order I m not able to view delivery cost for the same.
I check this thing in SDN but no concrete solution ..
My question is how to capture delivery cost in Multiple account assignment Purchase roder
Regards
AmitHi,
You have done goods receipt for Asset PO but no accounting document created. Now cross check in t.code:OME9 and find GR Non-Valuated check box selected which cause your concern on why your accounting document created for goods receipt for Asset PO!
Check how delivery cost designed for your Asset Purchase, may be in your case - delivery cost added to your asset purchase- which result, you could not find delivery cost in invoice posting!
Regards,
Biju K -
GR can not printed for PO-Multiple account assignment on single line item ,
Hi!
I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
Can you please let me have the solution ?
Thank snd regards,
Suranjana> I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
> Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
> I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How can I re-install the GarageBand
I think I have accidentally deleted the GarageBand. Is it any way that I can re-install it?
-
I am trying to have 3 to 4 featured products that share the same tag next to each other rather than stacked. Is there a way to do this by customizing the "List of Products by Tag" or is there another module I should be using? What i am currently get
-
Could not get schema Object:java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException ora-904
All of a sudden I get Could not get schema Object:java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-00904: "SYS"."O"."NAME": ongeldige ID when doing anything in the tables tree in the connections pane The only thing I set recently is pga_aggregate_target Environ
-
Sizing number of SFP ports on the WLC
Any comments on determining how many SFP ports should be utilized on a 4404? The hard limit appears to be no more the 48 APs are allowed per SFP port on the WLC. More pertinent, has anyone loaded up 48 APs per port on the WLC and what has been the re
-
Reg Alerts using with & without BPM.
Dear Experts, The flow of the inbound message is Customers>( Seeburger Adapter which receives the message and passes to the integration of XI CENTRAL HUB) CENTRAL XI HUB> XI HUB-->SAP System and the out bound is viceversa. 1. A Message fai