Multiple account payment through single Suppliers

Hi All,
Here is a trichy situation in Payable:
1)Every month payment made towards mobile bill telephone operator for various mobile bills used for official purpose.e.g. payment made to AIRTEL for 10 mobile numbers.
2)Each individual number has limit and if the bill for the number exceeds limit then the excess amount debited to the concerned employee.
Requirement:
1)To track all the individual numbers and their amounts paid through Airtel.
2)How to deduct from employee for the excess amount from their salary.
Is there any workaround available for this?Customer wish not to show any credit entry in expenses account.
Thanks
JPP

Hi and welcome to the Skype Community,
It sounds like you fell for a fake PayPal order confirmation email. Please check your purchase history on Skype which can help you verify if what claims to be a PayPal order confirmation for a Skype order is actually valid. Also it's best to not follow links from within such emails. Instead type in www.paypal.com into your browser's address bar manually and verify the claim there.
Follow the latest Skype Community News
↓ Did my reply answer your question? Accept it as a solution to help others, Thanks. ↓

Similar Messages

Is it Firefox causing me to be unable to login to multiple accounts on a single site (in mulitple tabs) at the same time?

For instance I can't look at multiple inboxes using the webmail app at one domain. Also, I have 2 etsy shops and can't log in to both at the same time on different tabs. Logging in as one on one tab, logs me out on the other. Is this a Firefox feature and if so, can I turn it off?

OK. This is not "site specific" it is Firefox specific. I have older versions of Firefox in which this does not happen. The moment I upgrade to a updated version, I have this problem. I have multiple accounts on a single site. When I open another tab, and try to open another account on that new tab, Firefox switches the initial tab to the new account. Previous versions left the original tab alone until I recycled that specific tab.
This particularly affects games, emails everything where you are working on one project with something, stop, someone opens a new tab and opens a new account on same site, and your work is wiped out on the initial tab.
My conclusion: since this multiple accounts-same site was possible on the old versions of Firefox, and it isn't possible on newer versions and it IS possible on Chrome (and I'm checking Safari, Opera and others) - it is a Firefox issue. Let's address it instead of pushing it off on various sites.

Multiple accounting doc in single file - PROXY

Hi,
I am reciving multiple accounting doc in single file..
MT_INPUT
acc_doc1
acc_doc2
I need to send it seperately to PROXY.
MT_INPUT
acc_doc1
MT_INPUT
acc_doc2
proxy needs to be called multiple times.....
how to do this?
Regards,
Akshay.

Hi Akshay,
Create a 1..n mapping and 1..n interface mapping.
You will then need to create an enhanced interface determination. (There is a radio button to select 'Enhanced'). The rest of you config will be the same.
This will split your single message into several messages, which will be processed individually by the receiver proxy.
Regards,
Yaghya

GR can not printed for PO-Multiple account assignment on single line item ,

Hi!
I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
Can you please let me have the solution ?
Thank snd regards,
Suranjana

> I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
> Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
> I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.

SRP547W Multiple IPSec policies through single IKE policy

I am trying to create a VPN between an SRP547W and a Cisco IOS router, in this case a UC540.I am running firmware 1.2.4 (003) Jan 11 2012
Now I can do this with an SRP527W and many other routers successfully. Including other IOS routers 1801, 1941 etc.
The issue I have is on the SRP547W I cannot create more than one IPSec Policy through a single IKE policy. I require this to route multiple vlans to our remote site.
When I try to add an additional IPSec Policy I am give the error "IKE policy has been used by other IPSec policy"
This is possible to do on the SRP527W with latest firmware. I have tried rolling back to earlier firmware but instead I am given an error about overlap.
Latest release note for this firmware suggest this issue was already resolved.
Any help much appreciated.

Hello Matthew,
Sorry to hear you are having difficulty.
I was able to test this on firmware 1.02.01 and get the overlap error that you mention. I resolved it by choosing "IP address & subnet mask" in the local selection field. When I used "IP Address" I received the same error unless I changed the IP address to something (other that the one used in the first policy) under the local traffic selection then it allowed a succesful submission. The remote traffic selector or ip address doesn't not have any bearing on the error.
Are you using the same local IP address for each IPSec policy and if you are, try changing the local IP selector to IP+Subnet mask. Also as a reminder, the number of IPSec policies is based on bandwidth limitations and most often no more that 2 site-to-site tunnels can connect at a single time.
Please let me know if this helps.
Best regards,
Wesley S.
Cisco SBSC

Multiple accounts and Mail 3.5 (Leopard)

I've been trying to get Mail to get and send e-mail from multiple accounts using a single ISP (in this case, my Verizon DSL account). My older app, Eudora Pro, can easily do this (for both POP and IMAP), as it has a system called "Personalities," where you can setup a main personality (i.e., your primary ISP account), yet allow other personalities/accounts to use that ISP for the outgoing mail server. It seems that in Mail though, while getting incoming mail from multiple servers isn't the problem, sending mail from multiple accounts through one outgoing server (which requires what Eudora calls "relay SMTP authorization") is problematic. I've set up multiple accounts in Mail and can get incoming mail from them, but can't seem to send outgoing mail except from my main ISP account.
Any suggestions?

I have the same problem - My kids each have their own email account within their own user profile, and while they can receive mail, they cannot send it. Sending from my (admin) account is fine, and their outbound accounts are set up identical to mine. I love having separate accounts because I can control how much time each of my kids get (6 of them!)and I get to supervise content on the web but this issue and itunes does not allow them to play back any DRM purchased itunes - acts like they are on a separate computer, not a separate user on the same machine - all itunes are in the shared folder...

Multiple Account Assignment Data for PR not coming in LDB - PSJ

Hi,
I am using one report in which LDB is used. LDB name is PSJ. However when there is multiple account assignments for single line item of PR the report is giving wrong result. Is this LDB suitable for the given functionality.

hi,
please check for the following points:
1. check in ME21N, are referncing properly or not...
You have to reference it via using the document overview ON or directly entering the PR as source document for the PO...
2. check whether is getting properly saved in the table EBAN/EBKN...check it in SE16...you can check as per the document number...
3. If nothing is helping you from the above two points check with the ABAP and BASIS consultant...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Viewing iPhoto Library from Multiple Accounts

First off I've asked this question before, a long time ago, but still don't have it resolved. I have (2) accounts on iMac with iPhoto 08 and I would like to share a single Iphoto Library. I would like Account 1 to have full rights and Account 2 only Viewing rights. Account 1 is set as Administrator and Account 2 is normal user.
When I first posed this question, I was told to move the Library to Shared Folders and then give Permission to Account 2 to "Read". I did that and it immediately locked up the Account 2s iPhoto with the error message "Drive is Locked or you don't have permission to make changes" when I log into the second account.
It's been that way for a very long time, my other users have been using Account 1 to view photos so I've ignored the problem.
Now I want to fix it:
Account 2 can't open iPhoto because of the error message and I don't know how to dissassociate the Shared Library from Account so I can open the program. How to safely do this?
Is there a preferred way, or even 3rd party software, that will allow me to share the iPhoto library among multiple accounts on a single iMac? Does latest iPhoto iteration allow this? I am willing to consider most anything at this point...

To use iPhoto Sharing it must be running in both Accounts.
This method seems a little clunky at first, but works very well. Most importantly, it uses the System to do the job for you.
Create a new Account on your Mac, call it Media. Create an iPhoto Library there. (BTW: This will work for iTunes too.)
Enable Sharing on the Library:(Preferences -> Sharing), leave iPhoto running and use Fast User Switching to open the other accounts. In those accounts, enable 'Look For Shared Libraries'. The Library will appear in the other source pane.
This means that both users will be able to see the pics. If you want to use a pic then simply drag it from the shared Library to your own in the iPhoto Window. This means that each user can have their own edits.
If you want to add photos to the Library: Log into the Media account for that purpose.
To make it all seamless: Set your Mac to log into the Media Account automatically. Set iPhoto to launch on log-in. Then switch to your own account using Fast User Switching.
Net result: a Library that's permanently available to all users but also protected. Each user can have their own versions of the pics if they want.
The permissions issue you're having is directly related to they to share the iPhoto Library. To change what Library account 2 is looking at: Hold down the option (or alt) key key and launch iPhoto. From the resulting menu select 'Choose Library'
To share an iPhoto Library with 08 without using iPhoto Sharing then move the Library to a disk (formatted Mac OS Extended (Journaled) and set to ignore file permissions. But remember, everyone will have the same access as you, if you do.

Creating multiple accounts on OS/400

Hi
Can any one explain how we can create the multiple account on a single resource.
I have a OS/400 resource there are 5 app which is running simultaneously on this resource. I want to create a account on all apps with same account Id .
Thanks in advance
Amitesh

creating multiple accounts supports natively with IDM. have you tried it?. You can enable it in your tabbed user form. see the piece of code below, enable it and try.
<Field>
    <Comments>Remove the Disable property or set the value to 0 to
    display the multi-accounts per user fields.
    </Comments>
    <Disable>
      <i>1</i>
    </Disable>
    <FieldRef name='AccountLinkFields'>
      <Comments>
        Fields to support creating or linking more than one account
        per resource.
      </Comments>
    </FieldRef>
</Field>

Down payment with multiple account assignment PO

Dear Experts,
While posting down payment request through transaction F -47 with
reference to purchase order we are getting below given error.
In that purchase order we have given
multiple account assignment i.e. multiple cost centers (e.g. Cost center A 50% cost center B 10% Cost Center C 40% i.e. distribution by %)
but
system is flagging message
Item 00010 of purch. document 4500024875 contains no suitable account
assignment
Message no. ME717
What will be the possible cause?
regards,
Abhijit

Hi,
In the request f-27 tr.code give the purchase order which item you want to give ie., for above said example 10 is a line item of 4500024875 - purchase order and beside you have to mention
10(lineitem) 4500024875 (purchase order) 2009 (year)
and system will take that request against the above purchase order.
Regards,
satish

Send Separate Remittance Advice - Can I send multiple files to single supplier based on custom groups

I want to send multiple emails to single supplier based on the Legal Entity of the invoice paid.
eg. If a supplier has two invoices in a payment, both are paid by different legal entities of invoices payable .. then I want to send to different emails to the same supplier
I am able to create 2 pages in the RTF using <?for-each-group:OutboundPayment;DocumentPayable/DocumentPayerLegalEntityName?>
But I am unable to send 2 emails
please help..

When I know i'll be transforming or adding additional filters, I prefer to go directly to creating smart objects rather than grouping them first, since the relevant layers are automatically "grouped" by being pulled into the smart object. My thought is that the default name for a smart object (or a group, for that matter) should be the lowest layer on the selected stack that has a non-default name, since in most cases that's the one you'd want to use for the new smart object. I don't know exactly how Photoshop recognizes layer names, but since it knows what number to assign to new layers or individual types of adjustment layers, it should also be able to recognize when a layer name is not a default name.

Multiple Accounts on Multiple resources through ActiveSync

Hi,
I am trying to create multiple accounts on multiple resource through activesync. But i am able 2 create on a single resource... below is the code
<Field name='NDSFilter'>
<Disable>
<isFalse>
<contains>
<ref>accountInfo.assigned</ref>
<s>Dev-NDS</s>
</contains>
</isFalse>
</Disable>
<Field name='newAccountRequest'>
<Expansion>
<block trace='true'>
<s>Dev-NDS</s>
</block>
</Expansion>
</Field>
<Field name='global.NdsUname'>
<Expansion>
<block>
<s>NdsFour</s>
</block>
</Expansion>
</Field>
<Field name='global.NDSOU'>
<Expansion>
<block>
<s>ADK</s>
</block>
</Expansion>
</Field>
<Field name='accounts[Dev-NDS].waveset.generate'>
<Default>
<s>true</s>
</Default>
</Field>
</Field>
<Field name='DSFilter'>
<Disable>
<isFalse>
<contains>
<ref>accountInfo.assigned</ref>
<s>UOS-AssociatesLDAP</s>
</contains>
</isFalse>
</Disable>
<Field name='newAccountRequest'>
<Expansion>
<block trace='true'>
<s>UOS-AssociatesLDAP</s>
</block>
</Expansion>
</Field>
<Field name='accounts[UOS-AssociatesLDAP].accountId'>
<Expansion>
<block trace='true'>
<s>AccountTwo</s>
</block>
</Expansion>
</Field>
<Field name='global.OU'>
<Expansion>
<block trace='true'>
<s>UOS-MultiAccounts</s>
</block>
</Expansion>
</Field>
<Field name='accounts[UOS-AssociatesLDAP].waveset.generate'>
<Default>
<s>true</s>
</Default>
</Field>
</Field>
Can anyone pls suggest me the solution...
Thanks in advance
Kiran

Thanks for the reply... in my case this would be done by the active synch process so no GUI form is required. I will be getting a list of application ID for the user by LDAP AS. One i get it i will have to parse it and get the list of application user id. I am passing those ID;s to a workflow where I am forming the resource name as you mentioned
for example:
If i get user1#user2#user3 from AS i am separating them based on # using split and getting 3 different user id;s
now i am forming a string with the resource name and passing it to the sub process in which i am checking out the user object, setting the user attributes and checking in the new view.
user1#LDAP
user2#LDAP|1
user3#LDAP|2
Problem ; When i run this user1 is getting created in LDAP but user2 and user3 are not. There entry is getting created in IDM.
When I open the IDM object I get a yellow triangle (warning) and if I open the user object and hit save button IDM creates the user account on the LDAP.
any help for further solving this problem would be appreciated.
Regards,

Multiple users on a single iTunes account

I am wondering if anyone knows how one will be able to manage multiple users under a single account under the new iOS5. Let me explain. In my house my wife and children download content ( movies, music, app) under my itunes log in so we can decide to watch the movie on my computer or my sons iphone without running into DRM issues. With the automatic syncing of pictures with iCloud I dont want my pictures and hers being mixed up but would like to each have an account. The problem is that I dont want to loose the ability of having the same DRM account for different itunes account. In other words, is there a way to associate a couple of me.com (icloud) emails / accounts to be associated with one itune store purchase account to be able to take advantage of sharing content with in the family. My apologies for the long winded question but I couldn't explain it any other way.:)
Any insight is greatly appreciated. thanks

This is from a MobileMe page, so it may not fully apply, but it suggests you'll be able to use separate accounts for iCloud and iTunes.
http://www.apple.com/mobileme/transition.html
If I use different accounts for iTunes and MobileMe, can I merge them into a single account and use it with iCloud?
No. You cannot merge two accounts into one. However, you will be able to move your MobileMe account ([email protected]) to iCloud and, if you choose, you can continue to use a different iTunes account for store purchases and iTunes in the Cloud.

Can you have multiple itunes accounts on a single computer? want to open a separate one for our daughter (but we will manage it).

just got our daughter a new iTouch, but want to try and keep hers separate from our iPhone stuff. can you have multiple iTunes accounts on a single computer?

This is all i know but all you can do is just creat a new one for them both and send all the stuff to the one think u can do that i hope it helps

Managing multiple itunes accounts on a single computer

I have an iPod and an iPad that use a single iTunes account on a certain PC. I have a second iPod that I have setup on a second computer which also has its own separate iTunes account (because at the time I didn't understand you can manage multiple devices from a single account/computer). This second iPod has iPod apps I have purchased from my second iTunes account. I would like to change this and manage my second iPod from my main computer (so everything lives in one place). When I hooked the second iPod up to my main computer I picked the option to "transfer purchases to this computer". It acted like it was doing it, but I noticed nothing transferred. I unplugged the device and plugged it back in, and a dialogue box told me this iPod contained 33 applications that were NOT authorized to play on this computer and would not transfer them. It said I needed to authorize the computer to do that. My PC is already authorized with my main account and I don't want to mess that up. Can I authorize my computer for my second itunes account and have it authorized for both? Am I allowed to take apps I've purchased for the ipod that is on account 1 and install any of those apps on the ipod that is associated with account 2? I've purchased all these apps, I just did not understand from the get go that there was no need for me to setup 2 completely different itunes accounts. The second iPod I am going to give to my young daughter as a toy, but I absolutely don't want to mess up my iPad and first iPod as I use them for work on a daily basis. Any help would be appreciated.

+Can I authorize my computer for my second itunes account and have it authorized for both?+
Yes. Sign out of the itunes store under the first account, then _sign back in_ with 2nd.
+I just did not understand from the get go that there was no need for me to setup 2 completely different itunes accounts.+
Don't worry, lots of people made this same mistake. It will be kind of a hassle remembering to authorize both accounts in the future, but it's manageable. You know that license agreement that comes up after an itunes update? I think you'll have to go in under both accounts and agree to it from now on.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1848
See this line?
+If the iTunes Store purchases on your device were purchased with multiple accounts, you will need to authorize the computer for each one.+
That's what I'm talking about.

Multiple account payment through single Suppliers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for