Multiple account problems

Hi there,
I have some problems with my account. While I tried to set up a sync account, I am not able to log in.
Resetting the password does not help, the first attempt at reset password fail for not receiving the email. Then requested username, this seems ok. Again tried to reset password, received email, reset password, Still not able to log in. Reset again, no email received.
Tried to remove accounts, but this seems impossible without getting into the account. And this account (from which I am making this post has got the same username) does not have a delete option.
Any tips on what to try next?
Thanks in advance

Reset your account
*https://account.services.mozilla.com/forgot
Give some time to receive your email
Delete Account
*https://account.services.mozilla.com/
**Delete your account

Similar Messages

  • Multiple account problem

    When I first got my Mac, I created an iTunes account using my old AOL user name. When I got DSL and a different computer, I cancelled my AOL Account. Now whenever I try to play any of the songs purchased on the old account it asks for my old AOL login and password. When I put it in it says that the aol screen name could not be found or the password is incorrect. I called AOL and verified my password and logged into AIM using it, but iTunes still will not take it.
    Also, iTunes has removed those songs from my iPod.
    HELP

    Hi ,
      For services you can have GR non valuated unticked if you enter Multiple account asst.
    For material the GR non valuated is ticked automatically if the acct asst is multiple.
    Rajesh

  • Limti PO with Multiple account assignment Problem

    Hi,
    Can we create limit PO with Multiple account assignment.
    If yes, i have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post service entry sheet the value is posting for only first one cost centre/Order but not all.
    So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
    Reagrds,
    JM

    Hi Summer,
    We have implemented SAP Note 1165524 for multiple account assignment as suggested, and it is working fine for New POs.
    But we have old Purchase order which still have wrong commitment, and GR and IR are already posted for this PO, we have to reduce the commitment to Zero.
    there is one solution for this is set  'No further Invoice expected' check box selected in this PO, but in our case PO  went into error in process after doing this.
    Please help me to reduce commitment to zero for this old PO
    Thanks in advance
    Vikas

  • Multiple Account Assignment problem in BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE

    I'm calling BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE and passing tables REQUISITION_ITEMS and  REQUISITION_ACCOUNT_ASSIGNMENT. I'm passing the following to the items table:
                'Y'           to lt_bapiebanc-acctasscat,
                '1'            to lt_bapiebanc-distrib,
                '1'            to lt_bapiebanc-part_inv.
    And I'm passing the following to the account assignment table:
            v_qty           to pt_bapiebkn-preq_qty,
            wa_rfq-item   to pt_bapiebkn-preq_item,
            wa_rfq-glacct to pt_bapiebkn-g_l_acct,
            p_unload_pt   to pt_bapiebkn-unload_pt.
    I receive error: "Please Enter Account Assignment".
    I did get a successful Requisition created before including bapiebanc-distrib and bapiebanc-part_inv, but then the multiple account assignment didn't work. I hope somebody can help, I'm getting desperate!
    Thanks,
    Beth Holback

    Hi,
      can you say me what u did to solve the issue?
      since i am facing it now. kindly help me out..
    thanks
    Suganya

  • Multiple accounts on one computer

    How to set up multiple accounts in itunes

    This is from the link John Galt gave:
    "If you share your computer with other people, you can maintain separate user accounts for each person who uses the computer. This is useful especially if each user has different tastes in music or other media; users can maintain separate, personalized iTunes libraries and can customize their devices' sync settings accordingly."
    Which only works if all user accounts use the SAME iTunes account. This is not what the original question was. I have 2 iTunes accounts and 1 Mac. I have 2 user accounts setup and each account uses a seperate iTunes account. The problem is since they introduced this ridiculous 90 day rule when switching iTunes accounts this no longer works. I was happily using my current acount and when I switched to the older account to download my old movies I bought on it I got hit with the "you have to wait 90 days before switching iTunes accounts" when I tried to go back to my original account.
    This has broken and ruined what used to be a great system. Let me explain:
    Back in 2000 when you bought a DVD you could take this DVD with you to your friends house and pop it in their player and enjoy the movie.
    Fast forward to future where no-one wants shiny disc or any other physical medium you go to your friends place and log into your account and watch the movie that way. Simple easy... till the 90 day rule.
    I fully understand the logic behind it (protecting their IP), but it breaks the system for legit users. Copyright has always stood in the way of progress. There isn't a single copyright protection on shiny disc that has not been broken. All that engineering effort, time and money and you can download a free app to break it.
    You cannot stop piracy, just like you cannot stop thieves. You can however try and catch them AFTER the act and punish them. This 90 day rule is like not allowing you to walk into the same store more than once in 3 months in case you might have stolen something the first time you where there. It's a stupid way to prevent something that is un-preventable.
    There are many ways to get around the 90 day rule for people that do want to pirate someone elses library, but it does completely block someone who is just trying to use his own purchased media in a legit way. Stupid...
    I am now forced to own 2 seperate computers just to access my 2 iTunes accounts.

  • Will apps from multiple accounts sync on one device

    When I first started using iTunes I was too young to have an iTunes account so I used my mums to make purchases to sync to my iPad via the computer. A few years later I had created my own account when I got my laptop mainly to purchase movies to watch and music for my iPod however the email I used I no longer use as it keeps getting spammed.
    I recently purchased a new iPad via the apple store(waiting for delivery) which I made a new apple account for what I am wondering is that as I did all of my app syncs for my old iPad via my computer all my apps are on my iTunes on my laptop however I was wondering if I were able to sync up my apps, music and new apps to my new device via my laptop without issue as they have come from multiple accounts.

    As long as there are five or fewer Apple IDs involved, you won't have a problem syncing the content. Note that the applications can only be updated from the Apple ID used to download them, and this may also apply to in-app purchases.
    (120742)

  • Multiple accounts on the same resource

    Experts,
    I am trying to create multiple accounts for the same IDM user.
    I have written a workflow which calls the subprocess to create multiple accounts. In the orignal workflow I pass the IDM accountId and the target system accountid in the Iterate loop.
    In the subprocess i am checking out the user view then appending the resource specific parameters (mentioned below) and then checking in the view.
    <Activity id='1' name='Add resource to user object'>
    <Variable name='userObject'/>
    <Action id='1' name='CheckOut User View' application='com.waveset.session.WorkflowServices'>
    <Argument name='op' value='checkoutView'/>
    <Argument name='type' value='User'/>
    <Argument name='id'>
    <ref>userId</ref>
    </Argument>
    <Argument name='TargetResources' value='EDS'/>
    <Argument name='authorized' value='true'/>
    <Argument name='Form' value="Empty Form"/>
    <Variable name='view'/>
    <Return from='view' to='user'/>
    </Action>
    <Action id='2' name='Add Attribute'>
    <expression>
    <block>
    <set name='applicationuserid'>
    <invoke name='get'>
    <split>
    <ref>userid_applicationid</ref>
    <s>#</s>
    </split>
    <i>0</i>
    </invoke>
    </set>
    <set name='resourcename'>
    <invoke name='get'>
    <split>
    <ref>userid_applicationid</ref>
    <s>#</s>
    </split>
    <i>1</i>
    </invoke>
    </set>
    <set name='user.waveset.resources'>
    <appendAll>
    <ref>user.waveset.resources</ref>
    <list>
    <s>RACF</s>
    </list>
    </appendAll>
    </set>
    <set>
    <concat>
    <s>user.accounts[</s>
    <ref>resourcename</ref>
    <s>].created</s>
    </concat>
    <s>true</s>
    </set>
    <set>
    <s>waveset.accounts[RACF].id</s>
    <get>
    <invoke name='getObject'>
    <invoke name='getLighthouseContext'>
    <ref>WF_CONTEXT</ref>
    </invoke>
    <s>Resource</s>
    <s>RACF</s>
    <Map>
    <MapEntry key='action' value='update'/>
    </Map>
    </invoke>
    <s>id</s>
    </get>
    </set>
    <set>
    <concat>
    <s>user.accounts[</s>
    <s>RACF</s>
    <s>].name</s>
    </concat>
    <s>RACF</s>
    </set>
    <set>
    <concat>
    <s>user.accounts[</s>
    <ref>resourcename</ref>
    <s>].gapracfid</s>
    </concat>
    <ref>applicationuserid</ref>
    </set>
    <set>
    <concat>
    <s>user.accounts[</s>
    <ref>resourcename</ref>
    <s>].identity</s>
    </concat>
    <concat>
    <s>uid=</s>
    <ref>applicationuserid</ref>
    <s>,ou=racf,ou=Applications,dc=gap,dc=com</s>
    </concat>
    </set>
    <set>
    <concat>
    <s>user.accounts[</s>
    <ref>resourcename</ref>
    <s>].firstname</s>
    </concat>
    <ref>user.accounts[Lighthouse].firstname</ref>
    </set>
    <set>
    <concat>
    <s>user.accounts[</s>
    <ref>resourcename</ref>
    <s>].lastname</s>
    </concat>
    <ref>user.accounts[Lighthouse].lastname</ref>
    </set>
    <set>
    <concat>
    <s>user.accounts[</s>
    <ref>resourcename</ref>
    <s>].fullname</s>
    </concat>
    <ref>user.accounts[Lighthouse].fullname</ref>
    </set>
    </block>
    </expression>
    </Action>
    <Action id='3' name='Check In User View' application='com.waveset.session.WorkflowServices'>
    <Argument name='op' value='checkinView'/>
    <Argument name='view' value='$(user)'/>
    <Argument name='authorized' value='true'/>
    <Argument name='Form' value="Empty Form"/>
    </Action>
    <Transition to='end'/>
    <WorkflowEditor x='244' y='48'/>
    </Activity>
    When i run this in the IDM I can see all the entries but only first one is actually created on the target resource. When I open the user object in IDM and hit Save button IDM creates the accounts on the target system.
    I have already tried by using the refresh view just before the checkin view action but no luck..
    Any help for solving this problem would be appreciated.
    Thanks

    Thanks for the reply... in my case this would be done by the active synch process so no GUI form is required. I will be getting a list of application ID for the user by LDAP AS. One i get it i will have to parse it and get the list of application user id. I am passing those ID;s to a workflow where I am forming the resource name as you mentioned
    for example:
    If i get user1#user2#user3 from AS i am separating them based on # using split and getting 3 different user id;s
    now i am forming a string with the resource name and passing it to the sub process in which i am checking out the user object, setting the user attributes and checking in the new view.
    user1#LDAP
    user2#LDAP|1
    user3#LDAP|2
    Problem ; When i run this user1 is getting created in LDAP but user2 and user3 are not. There entry is getting created in IDM.
    When I open the IDM object I get a yellow triangle (warning) and if I open the user object and hit save button IDM creates the user account on the LDAP.
    any help for further solving this problem would be appreciated.
    Regards,

  • I want to use Mac Mail for my work email address, which containts multiple outbound options (i.e. hr@, me@ etc). Is there a way to set up Mac Mail to have an account with multiple outbound addresses rather than adding in multiple accounts?

    I want to use Mac Mail for my work email address, which containts multiple outbound options (i.e. hr@, me@ etc). Is there a way to set up Mac Mail to have an account with multiple outbound addresses rather than adding in multiple accounts?

    This sounds like the age old problem with keychain & Safari. I don't know of a way to solve it without using something like 1Password.
    The iOS app has it's own built in browser, so it has more control over what gets autofilled. Safari on OS X has an 1Password extension that handles account selection & autofill etc.
    Keychain is great in principle, but it quickly falls down when you need tight integration with many ID's & different use cases (work, home etc).
    I'd suggest you submit feedback to Apple about your thoughts. I did so years ago about this issue & this is how far we have come (back to the point where me.com synced passwords) :^)
    http://apple.com/feedback/macosx.html
    Other tools like lastpass or keypassx may also help if you want to truly segregate password storage, but that doesn't fix autofill, the way around that issue is to dedicate one browser for work.

  • Multiple accounts on the same resource in Oracle Waveset 8.1.1 patch 5

    Hi IDM Experts!
    I've customized my userforms in order to create multiple accounts on the same resource using the syntax accounts[<resourceName>|n].<attribute> like the documentation suggests. That worked fine using Sun Identity Manager 8.1.
    However, I've not been able to create new multiple accounts after I upgraded to Oracle Waveset 8.1.1 patch 5.
    Is there anything else that I have to take into account for this new version? Is that a bug?
    Thanks in advance for your help!

    Thanks for the reply... in my case this would be done by the active synch process so no GUI form is required. I will be getting a list of application ID for the user by LDAP AS. One i get it i will have to parse it and get the list of application user id. I am passing those ID;s to a workflow where I am forming the resource name as you mentioned
    for example:
    If i get user1#user2#user3 from AS i am separating them based on # using split and getting 3 different user id;s
    now i am forming a string with the resource name and passing it to the sub process in which i am checking out the user object, setting the user attributes and checking in the new view.
    user1#LDAP
    user2#LDAP|1
    user3#LDAP|2
    Problem ; When i run this user1 is getting created in LDAP but user2 and user3 are not. There entry is getting created in IDM.
    When I open the IDM object I get a yellow triangle (warning) and if I open the user object and hit save button IDM creates the user account on the LDAP.
    any help for further solving this problem would be appreciated.
    Regards,

  • Can you have multiple accounts in one library?

    I've had two iTunes accounts for several years now, and it was never a problem on my old laptop--I needed the second account because I wanted to use a giftcard from outside the US, and the credit refused to apply to the US iTunes store.  However, I replaced my computer about a month ago, and the new version of iTunes won't download my iTunes purchases automatically.  When I try, it says it's already associated with another account, and it will add restrictions if I set it to automatically download purchases.  I don't know what this means, but I'd like a way around it.  I don't want to have multiple libraries (which seems to be the only way I've seen other people on the forum use multiple accounts); there's music on both accounts that I listen to all the time.  I've been stuck working off of two computers for a month now, and it's getting frustrating.  Help?

    To elaborate a bit more. The public class must match the filename, however you can declare "inner" classes.
    An inner class can be declared inside another class, or even inside another method. Where you declare that class dictates the scope it will have. However, the lack of an ability to declare these classes public (a public class must be declared inside a java file with the same name), means that they are not visible anywhere else. However, they do still have plenty of uses.
    Declaring a class inside a method is used rarely, but would look something like
    public void foo(Bar myBar = new Bar
            private String baz = "Hello";
            public String doSomething()
                 return baz;
         myBar.doSomething()
    }This declares and implements the class Bar inside the method header. Sure, this is a pretty useless example, but you could put any methods or variables inside your inner class, and they would be available only during execution of that method. (ie. only have method scope).
    }

  • Is it Firefox causing me to be unable to login to multiple accounts on a single site (in mulitple tabs) at the same time?

    For instance I can't look at multiple inboxes using the webmail app at one domain. Also, I have 2 etsy shops and can't log in to both at the same time on different tabs. Logging in as one on one tab, logs me out on the other. Is this a Firefox feature and if so, can I turn it off?

    OK. This is not "site specific" it is Firefox specific. I have older versions of Firefox in which this does not happen. The moment I upgrade to a updated version, I have this problem. I have multiple accounts on a single site. When I open another tab, and try to open another account on that new tab, Firefox switches the initial tab to the new account. Previous versions left the original tab alone until I recycled that specific tab.
    This particularly affects games, emails everything where you are working on one project with something, stop, someone opens a new tab and opens a new account on same site, and your work is wiped out on the initial tab.
    My conclusion: since this multiple accounts-same site was possible on the old versions of Firefox, and it isn't possible on newer versions and it IS possible on Chrome (and I'm checking Safari, Opera and others) - it is a Firefox issue. Let's address it instead of pushing it off on various sites.

  • ERROR WHILE POSTING MIRO FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT (ASSET)

    Hi Guys,
    We created  a PO for asset with multiple account assignment. And we immediately do IR instead of GR.
    While doing IR it is giving error
    1) Quantity delivered is zero - Warning message
    2) Account 245350 requires a Transaction Type or is Invalid - Error message
    what may be the problem. how can we eliminate and post it
    Regards
    palani

    Hi,
    I would assume the G/L account you used was not properly set up.  Did you get the same problem if you try to change to another G/L account?  Perhaps, get your FI specialist to look into this G/L account-related error and verify it.
    Cheers,
    HT

  • Urgent plz...Error: Multiple Account assignment in  BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE

    Hi All,
    I'm using BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE to create the PR . The PR is created successfully with service lines. The service lines for PR item has to be assigned to different account assignment. My problem is that account assignment is not getting assigned to the service line for multiple account assignment cases, instead the account assignment is blank for the sevice line.
    Here is part of my code.
    For Account Assignment
    t_requisitionaccoun-preq_item = '00010'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-serial_no = '01'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-g_l_acct = '0000630010'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-cost_ctr = '0801112560'.
    append t_requisitionaccoun
    t_requisitionaccoun-preq_item = '00010'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-serial_no = '02'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-cost_ctr = '0801111710'
    t_requisitionaccoun-g_l_acct = '0000610090'.
    append t_requisitionaccoun
    t_requisitionaccoun-preq_item = '00020'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-serial_no = '01'.
    t_requisitionaccoun-cost_ctr = '0801111710'
    t_requisitionaccoun-g_l_acct = '0000610090'.
    append t_requisitionaccoun
    For Service account Assignment
    *<b>PR item 10</b>
    Service item 1
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-pckg_no = '0000000002'.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-line_no = 2. " line 1 is the header for service
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-serno_line = '01'.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-quantity = '10'
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-serial_no = '01'
    APPEND t_requisitionsrvaccass.
    Service item 2
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-pckg_no = '0000000002'.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-line_no = 3.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-serno_line = '01'.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-quantity = '10'
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-serial_no = '02'
    APPEND t_requisitionsrvaccass.
    *<b>PR item 20</b>
    Service item 1
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-pckg_no = '0000000004'.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-line_no = 2. " line 1 is the header for service
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-serno_line = '01'.
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-quantity = '10'
    t_requisitionsrvaccass-serial_no = '01'
    APPEND t_requisitionsrvaccass.
    With this code, what I get is the blank account assignment for PR item 10 and correctly filled account assignment for PR item 20.
    Does anyone done this before and can give me some help. Thanks.

    Hi, can you send me an example of this BAPI.
    I have the same requeriment, i'm new with bapis
    thanks

  • GR Printing For Single Line Item With Multiple Account Assignment.

    Hi All,
    There is PO for projects (Account Assignment -P - Network) in which in a single item consist of multiple account assignment.
    Noe while entering the GR I select "Collective Slip" option but when the GR is posted system automatically select option "Individual slip" and seprate line item are printed for each account assignment.
    The printing program is standard SAPM07DR. The SAP version is 4.7. Can anyone tell what is ther any setting in configuration or is it problem in program or smart form
    Thanks & Regards,
    Omkar

    hi
    please check your form and routine used to print.

  • PO issue (for multiple account assignment)

    Hi,
    I am greatly in need of help from you all.
    The problem is as demonstrated under.
    A PO is created using the Account assignment category A (Asset procurement). The material to be procured has the Quantity 4Nos.
    In the account assignments 2 qty are assigned to one asset and another 2 qty is assigned to diffrent asset. GL account in both the cases remain the same.
    After this PO is saved.
    GR is done using movement type 101.
    now GR is cancelled using movement type 102.
    Now in display PO Header- Status tab. here it is showing the quantity to be delivered is 4 but value is shown as 0.00.
    I<b> donot understand why the value doesnt get fetched in Status tab of PO header.</b>If I dont use the multiple account assignemnt for the above condition then the values are shown in the Status tab of PO header.
    Thanks in advance,
    <b>Sheetal</b>

    Hi,
    Yogesh is right (as usual).
    When you create the PO and assign multiple accounts to it you will be prompted to change the GR flag to either indicate NO GR or a Non valuated GR (you CANNOT HAVE a valuated GR for a PO with mulitple account assignements on the one line).
    The system does not post any values for this until the Invoice has been posted correctly (or posted and blocked).
    So the GR (and return if applicable) always have zero value.
    Steve B

Maybe you are looking for