Multiple asset numbers in Single PR/ PO line item

Hello,
If we enter multiple Asset Numbers in single PR/ PO line item then we get following error message while doing GR -
' Entry 7100000256 00001 not in table XACCOUNTING (system error) '
Message no. M7000
For this PO, in account assignment we have selected 'Distribution' as 'Distribution on quantity basis' and 'Partial Inv' as 'Distribute to following row'
In case of procurement of materials like chair, we are procuring few hundred materials and for each chair we are creating one asset number.
Please help to resolve.
Regards,
Milind Dumbre
Edited by: Milind Dumbre on Feb 2, 2011 3:24 PM

Hello,
Check these SAP notes 1386249, 1550451 is relevant for you. These notes are applicable for your system. these notes are non industry specific.
You can try these note , i think your problem may get resolve.
Regards
Mahesh Naik

Similar Messages

Multiple Country of Origin for single outbound delivery line item

We are attempting to find an a solution to record multiple countries of origin for a single SAP delivery line.
It seems standard SAP delivery only contains the ability to store a single "HERKL" value linked to the delivery line. (It creates a customs master in EIPO and links this to the delivery header)
We need a solution to be able to record multiple of these values without the use of Batch Management.
The example below demonstrates our requirement:
Scenario: Delivery 1001
- 1 line consisting of 5 eaches of a single part
- When picking we find:
- 3 eaches which where from Belgium
-2 eaches from Germany
without splitting the line somehow we are not able to add mutliple values
Note: We are integrating with an external WMS system and interfacing in these documents using IDOC processing and therefore it would be very beneficial if someone could provide both functional steps (application side) and technical steps (function modules, classes, etc) which can be used
Thank you for your help in advance

Hi,
Yes, it will work if items are lot controlled.
(you can use the same logic if the item serial controlled as well...using Serial Number DFF)
However, if the item is a plain item, there is no direct way of storing and retrieving the attributes ...such as country of origin, supplier name, etc ...
Thanks,
Hrishi

Posting multiple invoices against single purchase order line item

Hi,
We receive invoices on completion of certain milestones and Goods receipt is done when the final lot of material is delivered. For example the purchase order may be to deliver 1 quantity of Machine. Material is supplied in bits like Gear Box, Engine and body. Invoice is received when Gear Box, Engine is supplied. Final invoicing is received on completion of delivery (taking into account what has already been delivered)
Goods Receipt in SAP needs to be posted only once when complete machinery is delivered (the tracking for different parts delivered is done outside SAP). However, the multiple invoice needs to be posted in SAP referring to same PO item (Please note PO quantity for complete assembled material is only 1).
This needs to be treated as material and not service in SAP. Can you please suggest how to book multiple invoices for same purchase order line item?
Thanks

Hi Charan
Thanks for your reply. However, both the options are not feasible. Invoices can be received in different periods, sometimes over different months or years, hence needs to be booked immediately.
Also, i cannot create material master for each component as the quantity for the final material is only 1.
Any other alternatives?
regards
Sameer

XML shows multiple po distributions account for each po line item

Hi, We have custome RDF created for Purchase Order Detail Report. Per the PO summary report, PO nubmer 30367 has two lines and each on has single distributions. Each line has different distributions. Line 1distribution account: 01.000.105.65020.00000.00 and Line 2 distribution account: 01.000.000.15020.00000.00. However when I run the XML for PO summary report, each line items contains the two account distributions. How do you make it sho it only show the account distribution pertain to the each line?
**Please see xml below.**
- <LIST_G_COMPANY>
- <G_COMPANY>
<C_COMPANY>CTI US Ledger</C_COMPANY>
<C_ORGANIZATION_ID>83</C_ORGANIZATION_ID>
<GL_CURRENCY>USD</GL_CURRENCY>
<STRUCTURE_ACC>101</STRUCTURE_ACC>
<STRUCTURE_CAT>101</STRUCTURE_CAT>
<C_YES>Yes</C_YES>
<C_NO>No</C_NO>
<C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>1</C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>
<BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>0</BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>
- <LIST_G_HEADERS>
- <G_HEADERS>
<POH_REMARKS />
<CREATION_DATE>01-SEP-10</CREATION_DATE>
<STATUS>Approved</STATUS>
<REV>0</REV>
<PRINTED_DATE />
<TYPE>Standard Purchase Order</TYPE>
<BUYER>BUNTING, DOUGLAS</BUYER>
<C_CURRENCY>USD</C_CURRENCY>
<VENDOR>Softchoice Corporation</VENDOR>
<ACCEPTANCE_DATE />
<ON_HOLD />
<VENDOR_SITE>SOFTCHOICE - PO</VENDOR_SITE>
<ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>No</ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR>
<PO_HEADER_ID1>2790</PO_HEADER_ID1>
<REVISED_DATE />
<PO_NUMBER>30367</PO_NUMBER>
<C_FND_PRECISION>2</C_FND_PRECISION>
- <LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
- <G_BREAK_LINES>
<LINE>1</LINE>
<LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
<REV1 />
<ITEM_DESCRIPTION>Test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
<UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
<PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
<UNIT_PRICE>500</UNIT_PRICE>
- <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <G_SHIPMENTS>
<CLOSED_CODE />
<LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
<LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
<NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
<NEED_BY_DATE />
<PROMISED_DATE />
<SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
<C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
<C_FLEX_ITEM />
</G_SHIPMENTS>
</LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
</LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
<C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
</G_BREAK_LINES>
- <G_BREAK_LINES>
<LINE>2</LINE>
<LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
<REV1 />
<ITEM_DESCRIPTION>test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
<UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
<PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
<UNIT_PRICE>1000</UNIT_PRICE>
- <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <G_SHIPMENTS>
<CLOSED_CODE />
<LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
<LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
<NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
<NEED_BY_DATE />
<PROMISED_DATE />
<SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
<C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
<C_FLEX_ITEM />
</G_SHIPMENTS>
</LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
</LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
<C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
</G_BREAK_LINES>
</LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>2,500.00</C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>
</G_HEADERS>
</LIST_G_HEADERS>
</G_COMPANY>
</LIST_G_COMPANY>
<XCOMPANY_NAME>CTI US Ledger</XCOMPANY_NAME>
<YES>Yes</YES>
<NO>No</NO>
<ORG_ID>83</ORG_ID>
<CAT_ID>1</CAT_ID>
<COUNT_RECORDS>1</COUNT_RECORDS>
</XXCTI_POXPOSTD_1>
**Here is the Query for the RDF file...**
SELECT pol.line_num Line
, pol.closed_flag Line_Closed
, pol.cancel_flag Line_Cancel
, pol.closed_code
, plt.line_type Line_Type
, &P_FLEX_CAT C_FLEX_CAT
, &P_FLEX_ITEM C_FLEX_ITEM
, pol.item_revision Rev
, pol.item_description Item_Description
, pol.unit_meas_lookup_code Unit
, pol.note_to_vendor Note_to_Vendor
/* Bug: 141118 Take unit price from PO_LINES if there is no shipment */
, to_number(decode(plt.order_type_lookup_code,
'AMOUNT',null,
nvl(pll.price_override,pol.unit_price))) Unit_Price
, hrl.location_code Ship_To_Location
, pll.promised_date Promised_Date
, pll.need_by_date Need_By_Date
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Ordered
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Received
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Cancelled
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
- NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
- NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)),
:p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Due
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Billed
, pol.po_header_id
FROM po_line_locations pll
, mtl_system_items msi
, mtl_categories mca
, po_lines pol
, po_line_types plt
, hr_locations hrl
WHERE
ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) > 0
AND (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount), NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)),:p_qty_precision)) > (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision))
AND pol.item_id = msi.inventory_item_id(+)
AND nvl(msi.organization_id,:c_organization_id) = :c_organization_id
AND pol.line_type_id = plt.line_type_id
AND pol.category_id = mca.category_id
/* Bug No 141118
Added the outer join on po_line_id ,hrl.location_id and nvl on the shipment_type
Also added nvl on quantity and price so as to select quantity and price if the PO
has no shipments */
AND pol.po_line_id = pll.po_line_id(+)
AND pll.ship_to_location_id = hrl.location_id(+)
AND pll.shipment_type in ('STANDARD', 'PLANNED')
AND &P_WHERE_CAT
AND &P_WHERE_ITEM
ORDER BY pol.line_num

> I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
> Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
> I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.

Multiple account assignment and copy of po line item quantity to x lines

Hi,
I am wandering if it is possible to automate the copy of the first line presented for 10pc in multiple account assignment screen on PO line item level to 10 lines with quantity 1 in the same multiple account assignment screen. This is of course related to the second step we want to examine which is the creation of Assets for these 10 multiple account assignment lines
Looking forward to your proposals
Edited by: David Reynaers on May 19, 2011 5:09 PM
Edited by: David Reynaers on May 19, 2011 5:23 PM

Hi David,
First keep the PO line item Qty to 1 , then select multiple account assignment the first line with QTY 1 will be defaulted
Select the first line and choose copy just beside copy icon the new icon will appear "insert account assignment item"
Select on right side you have two options "Insert Once" , "Insert several times" select several time system will default Pop up
Insert number of times 9 , Now change the line item Qty. to 10
Thanks
Diwakar

Asset No. of the scrapped asset not appearing in the GL Line item display

Hi Friends,
As a part of the year end process the users have written of some of the assets thru T Code "ABAVN" - Asset Scrapping without revenue. The losses arising were posted to the particular GL Account as was defined in the config. However, when viewing the GL line item display we are not able to see the Asset No. against each of the line representing the loss arising from the scrapping of the asset. We tried changing the layout but still the asset no. does not get populated in the Asset column. Would need the help of freinds as to how can we change the settings so that against line item in GL we are able to see the Asset No. as well.
Thanks!
Regards,

Haven't tried it before but perhaps you could try using asset no. sort keys in the 'retirement loss' gl account.
Think the asset no. appears only on the asset cost and acc.depreciation line items ie. offsetting accounts don't have such.

How to delete single MRP element line item

Hi gurus,
I need to delete a SINGLE line item for an MRP list for materials. Is there a transaction to do this?
I have tried MD08, but that only deletes whole lists. I am trying to clear out old elements that are years old in my list for a material.
I will reward useful answers
Thanks!

Hi,
It's very difficult to say what to do since I cannot see what you see, and I do not know anything about your system.
In MRP there are: stock, requirements (IndReq, DepReq), transactional data (PO, SO, Delivery, PurRqs, etc)
1. What you should do is to define which materials are related in this issue.
2. Which kind of MRP elements are related (you have got old requirements, transactional data, etc?).
If you have old requirements you should find the source of them. DepReq cannot be deleted > they come from higher levels > you should find where they come.
Do they derive from old transactional data?
Do they come from higher and higher level, I mean there are IndReqs, SOs for FG?
(you can use 'pegged' function if you click on the MRP element)
If you know from which kind of source they come (only they come from old transactional data or from IndReq, SO) > you should eliminate them accordingly.
A. If they come from SO, IndReq you can use the steps written by me in my previous message. (You can use MD62 to delete old IndReq).
B.
If they come from old transactional data, you have to find the way to eliminate them. Maybe you cannot eliminate them by mass processing, I do not know.
But you canmake groups / categorize the transactional data > after that maybe you can use mass change / handle them accordingly.
I mean if you have SO and Delivery, you cannot delete the SO when Delivery refering to that SO exist.
So, in case of requirements please delete the requirements (IndReq, SO) that exist at highest level and running MRP you will get rid of a lot of mess (top > down). In case of transactional data the strategy is the opposite: bottom > up.
If you get error messages > double click on it and read what SAP says > if it's not clear search for the number of the error message on the forum.
Sorrowfully, I cannot help in case of HU, I do not know them.
BR
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jul 23, 2008 10:54 PM
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jul 23, 2008 10:56 PM

Retrieve Multiple Serial Numbers for given Delivery Document and Item

Hello Experts,
                      I am currently working on a 2Lis datasource to extract Delivery information.Now it is required to append the
datasource with field (say ZZSERNO) which should extract ALL Serial Numbers from OBJK table for a given Delivery Item.
I know that there is a link between table SER01 and OBJK to retrieve the same.However, my concern is- C_T_Data table is
already providing the Delivery Information and along with that I want to display ALL Serial numbers for a given Delivery Item.
A delivery Item can have more that one serial number linked to it as what I see in VL03N for a Delivery document.
So currently in RSA3, I retrieve say 1 record for a given Delivery Document and Item .Now an Item has say 10 Serial Numbers
associated with it, so i should see 10 Records for that Delivery Document and Item, after executing RSA3.
Please provide me with the CMOD logic to do so.

Hi,
You can Link LIPS and OBJK tables with Delivery and Del Item.........refer below for the code.
1) Declare an Internal table of type OBJK with fields DEL DOC, DEL ITEM and ZZSERNO .
2) Declare another Internal Table ITAB_LIPS of type LIPS with required fields say in your case *DEL DOC, DEL ITEM and ZZSERNO....etc.
3) Use below select statement to extract records from LIPS into ITAB_LIPS that you have declared for to fetch LIPS data.
Select DEL DOC, DEL ITEM ( here i have included only few fields but as per requirement please add fields here)   from
LIPS into corresponding fields of Table ITAB_LIPS.
4) write one more select statement to fetch Serial number data.
Select DEL DOC, DEL ITEM ZZSERNO from OBJK into corresponding fields of TABLE ITAB_OBJK for all entries in ITAB_LIPS
where DEL DOC = ITAB_LIPS-DEL DOC and
            DEL ITEM = ITAB_LIPS-DEL ITEM.
Loop at ITAB_OBJK.
Read table ITAB_OBJK into ITAB_LIPS with keys DEL DOC    DEL ITEM.
ITAB_LIPS-DEL DOC = ITAB_LIPS-DEL DOC
ITAB_LIPS-DEL ITEM = ITAB_OBJK-DEL ITEM.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
ITAB_LIPS-ZZSERNO = ITAB_OBJK-ZZSERNO.
ENDIF
ENDLOOP.
Hope the above code helps
Sujan

Troubles with multiple ESLL-SRVPOS in the same outline agreement line item!

Hi all,
Currently have an issue where the same service master is being used multiple times in a single outline agreement line item (set up with different groups in the service specifications with different rates).
This is causing issues with drawing services into purchase orders.
Eg: In ME57 when creating a PO from a PR, in the include LMLSPF5J /SEARCH_SRVPOS_CONT/ the system is checking if ESLL-KNT_INTROW is empty (which in my case it is, and message SE361 is displayed).
The main thing thats happening is that ESLL_KNT_PACKNO and ESLL_KNT_INTROW, which hold the reference data to the outline agreement in the PO should get filled with the packno and introw from the oa service line but it isnt happening.
I'm thinking of creating a validation so that the same service service number (ESLL-SRVPOS) CANNOT be used in the same outline agreement line item.
Wondering if anyone has had this same issue and what path they went down to resolve it.
Any ideas would be appreciated.
Tim

hi
u cannot do this because different line items cannot be in same cell as they are variable and only one field can be there ata atime in one column while creating field catalog
<b>u can do one thing. corresponding to sales order u can display its line items ion the secondary list and would make more sense also. for this make ur sales order number as HOTPOT on click of which will display its corres line items </b>
regards
ravish
<b>reward if useful</b>
Message was edited by:
ravish goyal

Invoice with Multiple Line item

Hi
Delivery Order (D.O) with many line items (more than 1 page) happen to print multiple invoices automatically. Infact I would need to set up in a single invoice with multiple pages.
But currently if the line items exceeded the max, automatically creates another invoice document (with different number).
Could anyone suggest step by step resolution.
Thanks in advnce.
RG

Maintain adjust the "billing relevance" setting in item category(VOV7) to K Delivery-related invoices for partial quantity.
Then when you create billing reference to delivery, you would be able to press "Selection List" button to change the billing quantity that you want to bill. But, mind it can't be done with tcode VF04, so, you have to use VF01 to create Billing doc.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Asset Balances & Cost Line items Report

Hi,
I am looking for a Report which would combine Asset (S_ALR_87011963)balance report and Cost line item Report(CJi3) for Projects.

Hi,
The flow is like this ( if u r using timesheets for confirmation):
CAT2 : Timesheet: Enter Times : User enters the time.
CATS_APPR_LITE : Approval of timesheet
CAT5 : Transfer to Projects.
This will post cost to Projects.
Another way of getting the Actual cost is Confirmation using CN25 or CN29.
Regards,

Asset number at the line item level

Hello,
to a recent client I have 2 depreciation areas - the first one is the statutory one and the second one is for the group. I have different accounts for each depreciation area and at the level of the first one the accounts are asset reconciliation accounts and for the second one the accounts are GL accounts.
All the postings (depreciation, retirements) are made correctly in both depreciation areas except the fact that at the level of the second depreciation area (with GL accounts) the asset number is missing at the line item level.The field status group is the same for the accounts involved.
Please, can somebody advice?
Thank you very much,
Claudiu

Hi Mark,
thanks for answering me and trying to help me. Regarding your questions - the posting on the second GL account are line by line, this landscape don't work with group of assets. This field ANLN1 is empty for this depreciation area, like I said the values are correct in asset explorer but in Fi for report reason the field is not available - that's my problem
Hope that I was more clear this time.
Thanks and hear you soon!
Claudiu

S_ALR_87012282 - G/L Line Items, List for Printing

can someone explain the steps in carrying out this transaction.
thanks
ganga

Hi Ganga,
Give chart of accounts
Gl account : if you need one GL account give that in from number
if you need more than one number then give from number to to number
if you need few gl accounts go to multiple selections and give that gl numbers
enter company code
under line item selection tab
enter open items at key date
clearing date: from date and to date
execute
line items will be displayed
regards
prasad

How to Find Out The Production Order Number For The Sales Order Line Items

Hi All,
I want to know the number of production orders for each sales order line item. I know the sales order number .Can anyone tell me how the tables can be linked to get all the production order numbers for each sales order line item.

I think it depends on your configuration. But check fields KDAUF and KDPOS in table AUFK. or in table AFPO.
Regards,
Rich HEilman

Updating LIKP-ANZPK when goods receiving one line item of Inbound Delivery

I am Goods Receipting a single inbound delivery line item via function module WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE. Once the line item, and associated Handling Unit, are received, I would like LIKP-ANZPK (number of packages) to be updated with a new total of HU's that are on the inbound delivery. Does anyone know how to achieve this? Is there some flag I'm missing in WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE? Here's my call to this function:
Format Delivery Number
    CLEAR: gs_vbkok.
    gs_vbkok-vbeln_vl = gs_e1edl20-vbeln.
    gs_vbkok-wabuc     = gc_true. "GR
    gs_vbkok-wadat_ist = sy-datum.
    gs_vbkok-kzebu     = gc_true. "Posting as Partial Goods Receipt
Format Picking Confirmation table
    CLEAR: gs_vbpok, gt_vbpok[].
    gs_vbpok-vbeln_vl = gs_e1edl20-vbeln.
    gs_vbpok-posnr_vl = gs_lips-posnr.
    gs_vbpok-vbeln     = gs_e1edl20-vbeln.
    gs_vbpok-posnn     = gs_lips-posnr.
    gs_vbpok-ebumg_bme = gs_l44_sum-vemng.
    APPEND gs_vbpok TO gt_vbpok.
GR the Individual Inbound Delivery Line Item. ZDL_BADI_HU_SAVE will
change the HU Status table HUSSTAT and the HU Header table VEKP to
allow us to delete the HU.
    CLEAR: gs_prot, gt_prot[].
    CALL FUNCTION 'WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE'
      EXPORTING
        vbkok_wa                 = gs_vbkok
        commit                   = gc_true
        delivery                 = gs_e1edl20-vbeln
        update_picking           = gc_true               "update the pck qty
        if_database_update       = '1' "check & save
        if_error_messages_send_0 = gc_true
      TABLES
        vbpok_tab                = gt_vbpok
        prot                     = gt_prot.

Good Morning
The solution is to fill KZAPK and KZNTG fields.
Example:
CLEAR ls_vbkok.
     ls_vbkok-vbeln_vl = <ls_created>-document_numb.
     ls_vbkok-vbtyp_vl = <ls_created>-document_category_sd.
     ls_vbkok-anzpk     = id_volum.
     ls_vbkok-kzapk = 'X'.
     ls_vbkok-kzntg = 'X'.
     ls_vbkok-wabuc = 'X'.
     CALL FUNCTION 'WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE_2'
       EXPORTING
         vbkok_wa       = ls_vbkok
         update_picking = 'X'
         synchron       = 'X'
         commit         = 'X'
         delivery       = <ls_created>-document_numb
       IMPORTING
         ef_error_any   = ld_error.
https://scn.sap.com/thread/1297166

Multiple asset numbers in Single PR/ PO line item

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for