Multiple Backends Connected to the same SRM client.

Hello All,
We have an interesting requirement.
We have an SRM 5.0 client with R/3 4.7 backend. Now we need to add another instance of ECC 5.0 to be connected to the same SRM client ( either on the same org stucture or a different org structure).
I am facing difficulty in doing the material replication.
I have the inbound queue in SRM blocked and I and getting the error message LOGSYS_FOR_GUID_CHANGED.
This lead me to the notes 588701 and 765018. But I am not sure this would actually solve the problem.
I have also seen the following thread which indicated that one CRM client should point to only one R/3 instance.
Downloading basic R/3 objects into CRM with brand new systems
Has any one so for integrated multiple backends to the same SRM client? What was your approch to the requirement? Inviting your views and opinions to this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Ajith

Hi
You can implement corrections in the note 765018 as you mentioned in your post.
We have done the same thing. In case of multiple backends and also if systems are refreshed with other instances (client copy), the logical system ID will be changed.
So we need to run the report mentioned in the said note and run the replication.
Rgds
Reddy

Similar Messages

Multiple Backend Connected to the same SRM client.

Hello All,
We have an interesting requirement.
We have an SRM 5.0 client with R/3 4.7 backend. Now we need to add another instance of ECC 5.0 to be connected to the same SRM client ( either on the same org stucture or a different org structure).
I am facing difficulty in doing the material replication.
I have the inbound queue in SRM blocked and I and getting the error message LOGSYS_FOR_GUID_CHANGED.
This lead me to the notes 588701 and 765018. But I am not sure this would actually solve the problem.
I have also seen the following thread which indicated that one CRM client should point to only one R/3 instance.
Downloading basic R/3 objects into CRM with brand new systems
Has any one so for integrated multiple backends to the same SRM client? What was your approch to the requirement? Inviting your views and opinions to this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Ajith

Hi
You can implement corrections in the note 765018 as you mentioned in your post.
We have done the same thing. In case of multiple backends and also if systems are refreshed with other instances (client copy), the logical system ID will be changed.
So we need to run the report mentioned in the said note and run the replication.
Rgds
Reddy

How to make Adobe acrobat feature to convert SAP Pages to PDF available for multiple users connected to the same server

We have installed Adobe Acrobat X Pro- English,Francais,Deutsch version 10.1.9 in our test environment and tried testing it for converting SAP pages into PDF with a few pilot users. In doing so we faced a challenge, where only one user at a time can use Adobe Acrobat PRO to convert SAP pages in to PDF.As long as the first user who is connected to Adobe Acrobat Pro via SAP isn’t logged off, other users connected to the same server are not being able to get the “Save As” dialog box to save the PDF in their preferred location.
This is a business requirement and we need an urgent solution for the same. Can anyone help us in telling us if this is possible and if yes the how to go about?

It's not something we deal with here, the LiveCycle products are a different world. Key points: Adobe LiveCycle is a range of products, some desktop, some server. LiveCycle PDF Generator is the one you should look at, it comes in 3 editions. License terms are by negotiation. Key management is via its Java API.

Multiple Ipods connected to the same computer

Is it possible to have two Ipds connected to the same computer, synchronizing with two separate Itunes libraries ?

Yes, here is an article that lists 3 methods. I prefer method 2, but it's a personal preference.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1495

How to make Adobe acrobat feature to convert SAP Pages to PDF available for multiple users connected to the same Citrix server

Hi,
In my previous endeavours to solve this business requirement where multiple users will be able to use the Adobe acrobat feature to convert SAP pages inside SAP to PDF, I was told that it is not possible to do this for multiple users at the same time. However I have found an article according to which it says it is possible. Could you check it once and let me know if this article can be used for implementing the requirement stated above as this link clearly indicates that Adobe Acrobat is supported on Citrix.
Please find the link below where it states it is adobe acrobat is supported in Citrix for multiple users.
http://www.adobe.com/devnet-docs/acrobatetk/tools/AdminGuide/citrix.html.

1. What is the Acrobat feature that you mean? There's nothing specific to SAP included with Acrobat.
2. Yes, some Terminal Server configurations appear supported (check carefully). All users of the terminal server will need a license, so far as I know - total licenses = total individual people using.

Multiple users connected to the same server

Hi there,
I was wondering if this scenario would be possible to be implemented on a Snow Leopard Server installed on Mac Mini 2.66:
- one iphone developer that needs to be remotely connected to the server to develop apps
- one project manager that will handle the project files and documentation. He will login to the server and upload/download files
- one app GUI designer that will login from time to time, to make the design in photoshop.
Can these 3 users be logged in the same time on the same server without any lag? Or this version of server will only support one user at a time?
Thank you!

Yes, you can do ssh and terminal connections, but I'm guessing that's not what you want here; I'm guessing you're headed over from X Windows or (more likely) Windows Terminal Services.
Google for Aqua Connect and related for the path that you're headed toward.
In general, Apple Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server runs one seat and one keyboard and one display per station, whether it's an Xserve server or a MacBook or whatever.

Cant login multiple network accounts on the same client?

Setup:
I have created a simple Lion Server on a new i7 Mac Mini. I have configured Open Directory in Master mode and have setup 4 user accounts. I have enabled the File Sharing service and checked the "Make available for home directories" option on the "Users" file share. I have configured each of the 4 user accounts to use this location as the home folder. I have connected my client machines (all OSX Lion) to the Network Account Server.
Problem:
I can log one user into the client machine, but when using "Fast User Switching" and logging on as the second user I get the following error:
"You are unable to log in to the user account "guestaccount" at this time. Loggin to the account failed because an error occured"
In the console if I search for that user account the related error message is:
11-07-31 12:30:54.993 PM authorizationhost: ERROR | -[HomeDirMounter mountNetworkHomeWithURL:attributes:dirPath:username:] | PremountHomeDirectoryWithAuthentication( url=afp://inntaserver01.local/Users, homedir=/Network/Servers/inntaserver01.local/Users/guestaccount, name=guestaccount ) returned 16
Any thoughts as to why the Home Folder "mounter" failed in this scenario?

Historically you have never been allowed to use Fast User Switching to log in multiple network logins on the same client machine. This certainly applied with Tiger, Leopard, and Snow Leopard. I have not yet personally tried this with Lion.
I believe that the underlying reason for this not being allowed is down to how AFP volumes are mounted. The AFP mount becomes 'owned' by the user that triggers the login. With a network login the first user becomes the owner and this means subsequent attempted network logins are denied access to that share and hence cannot access their home directories.
With Tiger, Leopard, and Snow Leopard servers, one could configure network home directories to be shared via NFS instead of AFP. NFS gets treated a lot different in terms of mounting, and is done more at a system level than a user level. While again I have not personally tried Fast User Switching with NFS shared home directories, this approach is specifically recommended by the authors of AquaConnect (a Macintosh Terminal Server solution) in order to allow multiple logins on the same Terminal Server. This seems to be for the same underlying reason. Using NFS does certainly work for use with AquaConnect and also works for the competing iRAPP Terminal Server product as well.
Unfortunately, Lion Server while it can be made to run an NFS server, will not let you configure using NFS for sharing home directories. I have actually reported this as a 'bug' in Lion server.
Neither the authors of AquaConnect or iRAPP have actually tested this scenario with Lion server yet, but AquaConnect do plan to investigate it. It could make it considerably more difficult to use their products.
So in summary, using NFS to share network home directories in theory would avoid the problem and can be done with a Tiger/Leopard/Snow Leopard server, but cannot be done with a Lion server. It is possible however to mix Lion with older server versions. This might for some people be a possible workaround.
PS. A bonus side-effect of using NFS shared home directories was that this allowed badly written software like Adobe's applications which are otherwise notorious for having major issues with network logins and home directories to work without errors. As an example Adobe Acrobat Pro introduced a bug in version 7.0 which prevented it being able to print-to-PDF (one of the major reasons to buy Acrobat Pro). It tooks two years for them to eventually fix this in Acrobat Pro 8.1 (I know because I spent that two years nagging them to fix it and was a beta tester). Unfortunately they then reintroduced the bug in Acrobat Pro 9.0. Fortunately I discovered this side-effect got round the issue although a clunkier workaround was also possible for Snow Leopard clients by redirecting certain folder paths.

Problems with multiple connections in the same transaction

Hi all !
          I'm have two questions regarding the way weblogic handles multiple
          connections.
          1) first, I don't understand why weblogic always create a new Managed
          Connection when I'm asking for 2 connection handles on the same connection
          factory and with the same connectionRequestInfo. Isn't it supposed to share
          connections ?
          For instance, the following snippet of code results in the creation of 2
          managed connections:
          ConnHandle conn1 = myCF.getConnection(myRequInfo);
          ConnHandle conn2 = myCF.getConnection(myRequInfo);
          The class corresponding to myRequInfo does implement the equals and hash
          method, so that weblogic's connection manager could use them to check that
          the queried connections are the same, and thus could share a single
          ManagedConnection between multiple connection handles. Apparantly it does
          not do that...
          2) OK, I just let weblogic create the 2 managed connections, but... My use
          of the connections is as part of a transaction. Here is what happens:
          ConnHandle conn1 = myCF.getConnection(myRequInfo);
          // a new managedConn1 is instanciated. the following happens (just a
          description)
          // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
          // xar1.start(NOFLAGS)
          // I use the conn1 handle
          conn1.close();
          //xar1.end(SUSPEND)
          ConnHandle conn2 = myCF.getConnection(myRequiInfo);
          // a new managed connection managedConn2 is instanciated.
          // xar2 = managedConn2.getXAResource();
          // xar2.start(RESUME)
          // I use conn2 handle
          conn2.close();
          // xar2.end(SUSPEND);
          // my bean returns from the remote invocation
          // the client of the bean asks to commit (using UerTransaction.commit on the
          client side)
          // xar2.end(SUCCESS)
          // xar2.commit(onePhase=true);
          // managedConn2.cleanup();
          And that's all. So, as one can see, managedConn1.cleanup was never called.
          When looking in the weblogic console, I can see that I have one connection
          with 0 handle and one with 1 handle, deemed as still being in a transaction.
          So, the conenction manager apparantly loses a managed connection during the
          transaction. And it's very very bad because after a couple of transactions,
          I'm running out of managed connections (I had set a limit of 10).
          Any one has seen such a weird behavior ? Is this a problem on my side, or
          weblogic's ? Thanks for your help.
          Sylvain


          I ran another test. This time I have a bean that makes use of a connector
          once per method invocation. The bean method invoked is "sayHello" and it
          gets a connection to the EIS, perform an operation on it and release it. The
          connector I developed uses XA transactions.
          My test client just calls 3 times myBean.sayHello().
          I can distinguish two cases:
          1) first, the client doesn't do transaction demarcation. In this case, since
          the sayHello method is marked as requiring transaction, the folowing happens
          in the bean:
          // **** first invocation of the bean
          connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
          // managedConn1 is instanciated
          // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
          // xar1.start(NOFLAGS);
          // managedConn1.getConnection gives a connection handle
          connHandle.doSomeWork();
          connHandle.close()
          // xar1.end(SUCCESS);
          // the bean returns from its invocation
          // xar1.commit(onePhase=true)
          // managedConn1.cleanup()
          // **** second invocation of the bean
          connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
          // managedConnectionFactory.matchManagedConnection is called. It returns the
          managed connection (managedConn1) that is in the passed set
          // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
          // xar1.start(NOFLAGS);
          // managedConn1.getConnection gives a connection handle
          connHandle.doSomeWork();
          connHandle.close
          // xar1.end(SUCCESS);
          // the bean returns from its invocation
          // xar1.commit(onePhase=true)
          // managedConn1.cleanup()
          // **** third invocation of the bean
          connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
          // managedConnectionFactory.matchManagedConnection is called. It returns the
          managed connection (managedConn1) that is in the passed set
          // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
          // xar1.start(NOFLAGS);
          // managedConn1.getConnection gives a connection handle
          connHandle.doSomeWork();
          connHandle.close
          // xar1.end(SUCCESS);
          // the bean returns from its invocation
          // xar1.commit(onePhase=true)
          // managedConn1.cleanup()
          2) second case : the client performs transaction demarcation. In that case,
          the connection manager instanciates 3 managed connections, calls start/end
          on each XAResource corresponding to each managed connection, calls commit
          once, but also calls cleanup only once, leaving 2 lost managed connections
          The client looks like this:
          UserTransaction utx = context.lookup("javax/transaction/UserTransaction");
          utx.begin();
          MyBean myBean = ctx.lookup(".......");
          myBean.sayHello();
          myBean.sayHello();
          myBean.sayHello();
          utx.commit();
          on the server the following happens:
          // **** first invocation of the bean
          connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
          // managedConn1 is instanciated
          // xar1 = managedConn1.getXAResource()
          // xar1.start(NOFLAGS);
          // managedConn1.getConnection gives a connection handle
          connHandle.doSomeWork();
          connHandle.close()
          // xar1.end(SUSPEND);
          // the bean returns from its invocation
          // **** second invocation of the bean
          connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
          // managedConn2 is instanciated
          // xar2 = managedConn2.getXAResource()
          // xar1.isSameRM(xar2) is called. returns true
          // xar2.start(RESUME);
          // managedConn2.getConnection gives a connection handle
          connHandle.doSomeWork();
          connHandle.close()
          // xar2.end(SUSPEND);
          // the bean returns from its invocation
          // **** third invocation of the bean
          connHandle = myCF.getConnection();
          // managedConn3 is instanciated
          // xar3 = managedConn3.getXAResource()
          // xar2.isSameRM(xar3) is called. returns true
          // xar3.start(RESUME);
          // managedConn3.getConnection gives a connection handle
          connHandle.doSomeWork();
          connHandle.close()
          // xar3.end(SUSPEND);
          // the bean returns from its invocation
          // the client invokes commit on the UserTransaction
          // xar3.end(SUCCESS);
          // xar3.commit(onephase = true);
          // managedConn3.cleanup();
          And so, managedConn1 and managedConn2 got lost in the way...
          What's more puzzling, it's that when monitoring my connector with the
          console, I can see that there are 3 connections. 2 declared as still having
          one handle used and being in transaction, and one not in transaction and
          with 0 active handle. BUT when monitoring the JTA part of the server, I can
          see that there has been 1 transaction that committed, and no connection is
          "in flight" as the console says. So, on one side the console says 2 managed
          connections are still part of a transaction while on the other it says that
          no transactions are currently in flight.
          Thanks for any kind of help on this very bizarre behavior.
          Sylvain

Multiple connections for the same user.

I have EJB A and EJB B. A and B use a JCA connector that
I have written. I have matchManagedConnections set so that if user U has not used EJB A or EJB B, then a new ManagedConnection is created. If user U has used A or B then that user is given a new virtual connection created from an existing ManagedConnection. Now the problem is that if user U access' A for the first time and then access' B BEFORE A has closed the connection, then a new ManagedConnection is created for user U. Therefore in this case user U gets 2 ManagedConnections to the EIS that we are using. Eventually one of the ManagedConnections is distroyed but I would like to eliminate this in the first place. How do a get Weblogic to see that a user has a ManagedConnection before that user is done with the connection.

You can't have multiple roles on multiple connection, as you are connecting to the same website (different sub directories) ultimately.
Here is the workaround:-
You can create a new user account on your machine and can manage different roles.
Hope it helps.

I have a serious contacts redundancy problem. First I have multiple email account formats, e.g., 2011 MacOutlook, 2008 Entourage, 2007 Window Outlook, iPhone Exchange and these are all connected to the same account. The problem is I had up to 15 contact

I have a serious contacts redundancy problem.
First I have multiple email account formats,e.g., 2011 MacOutlook, 2008 Entourage, 2007 Window Outlook, iPhone Exchange and these are all connected to the same account. The problem is I had up to 15 contacts for the same person.
I deleted the Entourage contacts as that seemed to be the program that was causing the problems. When I synced this morning, now all my contacts are gone from every where.
How can I restore to my last back? If I restore, it will ask to restore to the back that was just made… which has no contacts?
Help would be greatly appreciated !!

I have a serious contacts redundancy problem.
First I have multiple email account formats,e.g., 2011 MacOutlook, 2008 Entourage, 2007 Window Outlook, iPhone Exchange and these are all connected to the same account. The problem is I had up to 15 contacts for the same person.
I deleted the Entourage contacts as that seemed to be the program that was causing the problems. When I synced this morning, now all my contacts are gone from every where.
How can I restore to my last back? If I restore, it will ask to restore to the back that was just made… which has no contacts?
Help would be greatly appreciated !!

Solaris 8: Multiple primary interfaces connected to the same network

I have a machine with Solaris 8, and it has multiple interfaces that are connected to the same network which means they all have metric 0 (1 hop) to the default gateway.
assume:
e1000g0: 192.168.30.70
e1000g2: 192.168.30.72
e1000g4: 192.168.30.74
e1000g5: 192.168.30.76
gateway: 192.168.30.65 (Cisco Router)
However, it seems like despite the fact that they have a direct connection, they seem to be using e1000g0 to access the 192.168.30.0 network to get to the default gateway and then to anywhere else.
When I send a ping to say, 192.168.30.74 (IP of e1000g4) and capture packets on e1000g0, I see the "echo reply" messages going out of it as opposed to e1000g4 even though e1000g4 is the one receiving the "echo request". This should not happen and these should be completely independent as they should all be advertising a 1 hop to that network
The outputs from netstat -rn and ifconfig -a are shown in the picture on the link below
[http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/7308/ifconfignetstathiddenip.jpg]
This gets even more confusing when I go into the Cisco router and run the command: "show mac address-table" where only the MAC address of e1000g0 is shown for the switch port it's connected to, but not for the other interfaces which are connected to the switch. Yes, all ports are active (no shut) and are pingable.
Also, the odd thing is that ALL of these individual MACs show up in the router ARP table when the machine comes up, however after sending a ping to one of them, after a certain expiry or whatever period, the MACs disappear from the router ARP table and only the MAC for e1000g0 shows up. The arp table of the solaris machine however shows all the relevant MACs of each port of the router that it's physically connected to (This is actually a Cisco Switch with the advanced IP services imagine and L3 routing turned on)
Before anyone asks: The setting local-mac-address? setting does NOT exist in my machine and it never has, but it used to work fine. Also, from the ifconfig command, once can tell that all the MAC addresses are fine.
I need to somehow assign all these interfaces equal priority and make them understand that they're physically connected to the 192.168.30.0 network and there's no need to go through e1000g0 to get to it.
This is causing a lot of problems as eventually all traffic will end up going through the e1000g0 interface and that will become a bottle neck.
Please help Thanks in advance

Ok thanks. That was a useful response.
I did think about the trunking software that is claimed to be available for Solaris 8, but it's only available if you've got paid support contract. Oracle came and ruined everything re: Sun support which is so expensive now.
The other confusion is, we never had that OR needed to configure trunking/link aggregation on this machine, so why now?
Lastly, by your explanation, this should be expected and is "normal" behaviour, which would mean that this machine was always doing this and I only just noticed it this time? I thought if you turn off ipv4 forwarding and router function in the machine, it's every interface for itself. But it's not doing that :(
So then the question is, Can I force it? I've tried a bunch of things by manipulating the tables and it seems to mess things up where nothing is getting through or it now shifts all the traffic to some other port make the problem no different
Is there a way to give equal weight to all interfaces for the traffic to go directly through them that is originating at those ports?

Ability to open multiple SQL Worksheets for the same connection

Hi,
Please allow the ability to open multiple SQL Worksheets for the same connection, now only one can be opened.
Thanks

Logged Bug 9000801 - ea1: otnforum: worksheet launcher does not remember the last/default connection
-Raghu

Multiple iPod shuffles to connect to the same computer

Is there any special instructions to have two iPods that my family would want to connect to the same computer?
Each family member has our own playlist and we'd like to update our own iPod shuffles with our own playlists. The first iPod shuffle we bought works fine, but I'm having trouble getting the second iPod to be recognized.
thanks in advance for your help

Marc,
I have two iPod Shuffles supported by a single Dell Desktop running Windows XP/SP2. I'll relate my experience and hope that helps you. My first Shuffle was a 512Mbyte. I installed the iTunes software from the CD that came with the Shuffle, and then plugged the Shuffle into the USB port at the bottom front of the Dell. It was recognized by Windows and by iTunes and I was directed to register the Shuffle with Apple. I named the Shuffle and that name appears in the iTunes Source List. Then I acquired a 1Gbyte Shuffle for my wife. I DID NOT re-install iTunes from the new CD (although I made sure that the existing iTunes was the latest version 4.7.1). Now with iTunes open, I plugged my wife's Shuffle into the same USB port as I use for my Shuffle. Once again, the new shuffle was recognized by both Windows and iTunes and, once again, I was asked to register the second Shuffle and give it a name (of course, different from the other Shuffle). Now both Shuffles appear in the Source List. I only plug one Shuffle in at a time, and the Shuffle that's plugged-in has a little "up-arrow" appear to the right of its name in the Source List. I am the administrator and only user of the Dell, so there's no "partitioning" problems that might screw up the support of multiple Shuffles -- your family members may have separate accounts on your computer, but I'd suggest that only one (and always the same) user logon to access iTunes and the Shuffles.
Good luck.
Roger

Howto block p2p traffic of clients connected to the same ssid on different wlc

Hi all,
I use two wlc 4400 (4.2.x version) with a mobility domain and one ssid, both wlc are connected to a cisco l2 switch infrastructure. On the wlc I use the p2p blocking action 'drop' (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/5.2/configuration/guide/c52wlan.html#wp1209597) to isolate the clients from each other. Does anybody know if only unicast traffic is blocked or also multicast and broadcast traffic like arp requests?
Concerning blocking p2p traffic of clients connected to the same ssid but different controllers I found the following statement in the LAP FAQs (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps430/products_qanda_item09186a00806a4da3.shtml):
===
Q. In autonomous APs, Public Secure Packet Forwarding (PSPF) is used to avoid client devices associated to this AP from inadvertently sharing files with other client devices on the wireless network. Is there any equivalent feature in Lightweight APs?
A. The feature or the mode that performs the similar function of PSPF in lightweight architecture is called peer-to-peer blocking mode. Peer-to-peer blocking mode is actually available with the controllers that manage the LAP. If this mode is disabled on the controller (which is the default setting), it allows the wireless clients to communicate with each other through the controller. If the mode is enabled, it blocks the communication between clients through the controller. It only works among the APs that have joined to the same controller. When enabled, this mode does not block wireless clients terminated on one controller from the ability to get to wireless clients terminated on a different controller, even in the same mobility group.
===
Does anybody know what's the best practise to prevent this inter wlc client traffic? I already read about using acls on the wlc dynamic interfaces, or private vlans on the l2 switch vlans where the dynamic interfaces are connected to. Is it allowed to completely isolate the wlc from each other on these dynamic interfaces with acls or private vlans or do the wlc need to see each other on this interfaces (e.g. heart beat)?
Many thanks in advance,
Thorsten

Hi Sasha,Thorsten
The bug is Junked and I believe which is what you are running into with your tests:
CSCtr60787 WLC P2P Blocking Set to Forward-UpStream Doesn't Work.
Bugtoolkit : http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/action.do?hdnAction=searchBugs
To answer your original query :
ACL is only solution to block client communication on same ssid between 2 wlcs. 5508 works better with ACLs then 44xx platform.
ARP requests will be forwarded to upstream router just like any other traffic. WLC won't proxy arp for clients on same vlan.
Gateway arp's I believe should be handled by WLC . ( Don't quote me on this but I am pretty sure it is ) ..If it was not, then how would client know about gw ?
Multicast traffic is not applicable for p2p.
Your ACL can be as simple as this for the scenario :
WLC 1 - clientvlan = 10
WLC 2 - clientvlan = 10
and you want to restrict users from wlc1-wlc1, wlc1-wlc2, wlc2-wlc2 for same vlan10.
Basically in that case the ACL should look like on both WLCs :
1. Permit statement to talk to gateway.
2. Deny to subnet.
3. Permit all.
4. If DHCP/DNS other services are on same subnet then you would need to add a permit
statement before the deny.
5. Attach the ACL to SSID or dymanic interface.
Thanks..Salil
CSCtr60787 WLC P2P Blocking Set to Forward-UpStream Doesn't Work.

Multiple SSID's on the same subnet?

Can you have Multiple SSID's on the same subnet?
SSID1 authenticates clients via radius.
Our corporation bought printers with wireless cards that only support WPA-PSK so we created SSID2 for the printers. We can connect to both SSID's and ping from SSID1 to SSID2 but we can not perform other functions such as view the printer management interface with a browser. Should it be possibe to communicate between SSID1 and SSID2 on the same subnet?

Yes you should have no issue, but the only thing is that you are using a lower security method... so either you put them on different subnets so you can control the traffic via acl's or might as well use the same security method to make it easier. The fact that you can ping sounds like you should be able to http to the device.

Multiple Backends Connected to the same SRM client.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for