Multiple BP for same vendor in SAP SRM

Hello SRM experts,
We have an issue in our SRM 7 system where in during the replication of vendor from backend, the system has generated two BP numbers for one vendor in the backend. We are not sure of how and why this was generated.
Ex:
BP no     Vendor no
XXX23       XXX464
XXX24      XXX464
Thanks,
Vipra.

This issue occurs due to accounting index problem.
If the system does not renumber the accounting lines after deletion of 2nd or 3rd accounting lines then during the posting of SC to backend the error occurs as the PO document accounting line index gives a problem.
For more information please check the link : http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/x/UoXBEg
The issue is resolved now.
Thanks!

Similar Messages

Can i give multiple versions in purchase inforecord for same vendor and mat

can i give multiple versions in purchase info record for same vendor and mat code..is is possible??? plz help me
thanks and regards
Ramesh Reddy(VALLUR)

HI,
No .where you are getting version in purchasing info record ? why you want version ? suppose we put version then where you used that version ?
to get clear picture regarding purchasing info record
check following link
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/75/ee102f55c811d189900000e8322d00/content.htm]
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor

All SAP Gurus,
Is it possible to have Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor code (where purchasing org and company code is same)?
Regards,

hi,
You can't have more than one because the reconcilation account...Because this is the soul account by which you pay to vendor and send the details to further process to FI dept...
Regards
Priyanka.P

F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor

Hello,
Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
I understand that there are two places:
FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
Thanks everyone.

Ravi,
Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
Comments please?

Configuration for consolidated check for same vendor from different company

Hi All,
My company is trying to print a single check for same vendor with same vendor number in multiple company code.
The Automatic payment parameters has all company codes where the vendor is having open items.
But when payment run is carried out and the check is printed, there are more than 1 check printed for the same vendor corresponding to the cleared invoices.
One company is paying for all other companies and still multiple checks are printed.
Can someone help with some lead to resolve this issue.
Points will be assigned for helpful tips and answers.
Thanks alot in advance

Hi,
i understood ur problem so dont worry.... solution is there in sap
while confiqure automatic payment program in FBZP give paying company code payment transaction give company code what check through you want to pay that ....ofter that payment will go through this company code check only
may be this information is useful to you

Amount splitting for same vendor recon account in MIRO

Hi Gurus.........
I am very new into SAP MM.
I am facing a problem in MIRO. while simulating I am getting 2 line items for same vendor account splitting the total amount to be credited against the vendor.
the miro-simulation is just like following....
A     G/L     Act/Mat/Ast/Vndr                               Procurement Doc     Amount     Cur
S     200010     GR/IR Clearing A/C                                                    1,000,000.00     INR
S     100007     input VAT credit-Non-capital goods                               40,000.00     INR
K     200001     WIN TECHNOLOGIES / 741235 KALYANI          520,000.0-     INR
K     200001     WIN TECHNOLOGIES / 741235 KALYANI          520,000.0-     INR
Please tell me where did I make mistakes.........how can I rectify it..
Thanks in advance...

Hi
This can also be because of document splitting. Can you check whether document splitting is active in your system ?
If yes, these are some examples based on which document splitting can happen
Examples of document splitting characteristics:
·       Profit center
·       Segment
·       Business area
·       Customer field
Thanks !
E.Avudaiappan

Multiple currency for one vendor

Hi,
Is there any way to have multiple currency for one Vendor?

Hi Siva,
Yes, It is possible to maintain multiple currency for one vendor. How ? The procedure as follows.
During vendor creation using T-code XK01 and currency enter input data screen select Extra option on the top of the screen click and display 'Add Purchasing Data' option click opened new screen and give input data plant, tick mark of the option Data retent.at plant level allowed and tick for OK.
After that, you have enter multiple currency for the same vendor during vendor creation time, then you will create PO using T-code ME21N the currency field you have fill as you required currency by default first currency of vendor created will be display.
Hope, it is useful for you.
Regards,
K.Rajendran

Multiple address of same vendor

Dear All,
There are certain vendors which has multiple locations with different statutory information such as Stax No. etc.
At present we are opening new vendor. But purchase departments facing problem during preparing POs
(some time they are preparing PO against wrong Vendor ID because name is same ), reconciliations of account of such vendors. Because they have to take care of different
codes of same vendors.
Is there any solution?
Thanks in advance,
Nirav

When you have multiple address for a vendor with different functions ...each vendor address should be set up as a different vendor. Then for the main vendor link the other vendor numbers through partner functions. Using Transaction WOLP, Partner roles and partner schemas at vendor level and purchasing Document level can be defined. Create as many vendor numbers as required and assigning to the respective partner roles.
Edited by: m_n_novice on Aug 28, 2009 4:25 PM

Reg:Multiple UOMs for same item

Hi,
How to define the multiple UOMs for same item.And the item should be converted in one UOM.
Iam using 9.0 PL.08

Hi,
Please check SAP help file:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sbo900/helpdata/en/89/7ca0a701c64e4a97f4ea5a4edca8b2/content.htm?frameset=/en/44/c4c1cd7ca22e17e10000000a114a6b/frameset.htm
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

1099 payments are not combined for same vendor payments

Hi All
I have a question on 1099 reporting.
My issue is that we are running the report in transaction code s_p00_07000134 separately by company code because all these company codes have separate tax ids except few of them which have same tax ids. My client wants to run them (ccodes with same tax ids) together and if there is a same vendor on these company codes . They are being shown on the report separately and the 1099 forms are printing separately.
Cant the system combine the payments for same vendors under different company codes with same tax ids run together/
Please help me..

Hello,
Did you get the answer for this problem? Could you please explain how did you resolve it?
Thanks

Different Pricing Schema in PO and PIR for same vendor and material

Dear Experts,
I am facing an issue related to MM.
I have a vendor and a material under a plant, purchase Org, purchase group.
When we are creating a Purchase Info Record (PIR), it is picking one pricing schema, while when creating PO for same vendor and material, it is picking another different pricing schema.
As per my knowledge, pricing schema in PO is picked as per pricing schema group of Vendor and I believe same applies for PIR as well. I have only one vendor pricing schema group.
Because of this issue, I have to manually key-in condition values in PO for all condition types even though I have maintained a purchase info record.
Please suggest, what can be reason.
Regards,
Praveen

Hi,
Thanks for clearing my doubts.
However, I stuck-up in another issue.
Problem is that condition type- PB00 is linked with almost all pricing schemas.
Hence, I can't change pricing procedure in condition type- PB00.
Also, I can't include all J* related condition types in RM0002 as well.
Hence, if PB00 remains as RM0002 and I maintain my pricing procedure- ZJIMPO to all J* condition types, still I am not able to create PIR for all J* conditions. Error "Condition type J1CV is not in procedure A M RM0002".
How to handle this issue? Please suggest.
Thanks
Praveen

How to avoid multiple listing for same artist?

How to avoid multiple listing for same artist?

Sounds like there might be blanks in the artist name.
For instance "Lou Reed" and "Lou Reed_" will not match.
(Pretend the underscore _ is a blank).
Select all the Lou Reed songs, Get Info, and type "Lou Reed" in the artist field. That should fix it.

Creating multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to store multiple values for same properties

Hi All:
I am trying to create multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to
store multiple values for same properties. Here my intention of using
'unified profile types' is to create multiple profiles (to store multiple
values for a property). All the properties are stored in the same database
maintained by Personalization server. Also, I am trying to use the same
'USER' ejb as profile class/home/pk/jndi.
The scenerio is,
define unified profile types (Business, Vacation) using Personalization
admin tools, using com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.User,
com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.UserHome,
com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.UserPk,
com.beasys.commerce.axiom.contact.User for Profile Class, Home, Pk class,
JNDI name respectively.
Define Property set 'HotelCommerce' with property
HotelProp as single, restricted, text (valid values Single, Double)
Now you can use the attached jsp files to login as a user and try to set the
property value for HotelProp for each profile. As per my understanding, I
was expecting that I can set different values for the property 'HotelProp'
for each profiles. But unexpectedly, all the profiles get the same value.
Question. is it the correct behavior? if yes, how can I achieve this
functionality?
if not, do you see any problem in my scripts?
your answer asap is appreciated. we need to make decision on using
Personalization server v/s developing our own Personalization server!!!:)
thanks,
-rajesh
PS: I have tried 'Unified Profile Example' type too, but that did not work.
[propsettest.jsp]
[home.jsp]

I am trying to create multiple profiles, using unified profile types, to
store multiple values for same properties. Here my intention of using
'unified profile types' is to create multiple profiles (to store multiple
values for a property). All the properties are stored in the same database
maintained by Personalization server. Also, I am trying to use the same
'USER' ejb as profile class/home/pk/jndi.Hello Rajesh,
This is not the purpose of the UUP. The UUP is used to allow existing
database schemas to be aggregated with the existing Weblogic Personalization
Server database schema to provide a single, customized user profile with which
to maintain the user properties (
http://e-docs.bea.com/wlcs/p13n/users.htm#1068901 )
If you want to have properties that change value based on some "profile" or
classification of a user, then you should use classifier rules to change the
user from "OnVacation" to "AtWork" or "AtHome". You can use these classifier
rules to select content for the user or conditionally execute logic (
http://e-docs.bea.com/wlcs/p13n/rules.htm )
Ture Hoefner
BEA Systems, Inc.
1655 Walnut Street; suite 200
Boulder, CO 80302
www.beasys.com

FI F110 payment run multiple payment documents for same vendor l

We have an issue where a F110 automatic payment run creates two payment documents for the same vendor multiple open items in the same run. The payment method for all the open items is the same. I am not able to identify the logic based on which system bifurcates these open items to create two different payment documents. It is standard SAP functionality and we do not have any additional customization.
I have also checked criteria mentioned in FBZP Payment method in company code Payment per due day but does not seem to be relevant. If you have any pointers in this context request you to share the same at the earliest.

Hello,
In FBZP we have below setting for grouping of items in company code payment method.
1.Single payment for marked line item: Single payment will be created for every line item if this check box is selected.
2.Payment per due day: One payment document is created for all the invoices which are due on specific due date.
Please check if any of above option is selected here.
We have also control at vendor master:
Vendor master data > Company code > Payment data > Automatic payment transactions > individual payment.
If check box is selected then every vendor or customer item is paid separately during automatic payment transactions.
Thanks!
Raju

Multiple APP run's for same vendor

Dear Friends,
I would like to know whether it is possible to do multiple payment proposals for a vendor on same dates.
here is the scenario:
Each business area would like to creat and edit payment proposals for the same dates, for ex: Run date is 1.1.08, next payment date will be 02.01.08 and schedule the actul payment run on say 03.01.08.
The actual payment runs will be processed by different paying coc.ode on 03.1.08
so for a given vendor say we have 2 open items which are due for each business area. I tried giving Business area in free selections .
when I try to create a secong payment proposal system gives me the message saying no payment proposal found for the co.code Message nO.FZ349
Yes it does makes sense to this meesage in the sense system wants to check that no invoice is paid twice by mistake.
But my question is since I am restricting open items by Busines area in the selection parameters itself shouldnt that be considered by system.
Hope I am clear.
Please let me know your inputs on the same.
Points assured for useful replies.
Thanks,
Vamsi

Hi Chandra,
Thanks for your inputs.
When you say that same vendor can be paid more than 1 once in a given day by APP, I belive you meant that once paymnet run has been done we can create another APP process for the same vendor.
Yes I dont see any issues there.
I also have no doubt that we can create multiple payment runs for a given vendor for 2 different co.codes on the same day.
But the issue I have is a case of centralised payment for all regions which are represented by Business areas.
Each region will do business with the same pan india vendor and would like to create thier payment proposals. The payment runs for these proposals will be done by the head office.
while trying to the second payment proposal, thi sis the message:
"Vendor 54 222 is contained in proposal 24.01.2008 SB1; no editing"
Hope I am clear.
Thanks,
Vamsi

Multiple BP for same vendor in SAP SRM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for