Multiple Computer support

Hi,
This may seem a basic question and may have been answered, but the topics i have found so far havent answered the question.
Ive got apple tv - and 3 computers in the house... all of which are mine/families.. so far only my MBP can access the apple tv in itunes - and none of the others can locate/access the content. Is this possible? Basically i purchase stuff on itunes via apple tv, can i watch it in another "room" as my Mac Pro etc are in other rooms.
ideas?
Ive tried checking software updates, rebooting, using the passcode/locate on apple tv.. but i cannot make it show in devices on any of the other computers!

AppleTV is a client device not a media server. It cannot share or sync media with any but the sync computer.
It can only sync with a single iTunes library which allows you to backup direct AppleTV purchases or transfer them to iPods/iPhones/other AppleTV's, or copy and add files to another iTunes library..
You could share your iTunes library across the network using Home Sharing or iTunes Sharing - both from iTunes - to access content from the sync computer on the other computers.
AppleTv can stream content contained on other computers to play on your TV but it can't sync to a streaming computer.

Similar Messages

NB520 - Multiple monitor support

Do NB520 have multiple monitor support built in, if not, how can I have multiple monitor support for my NB520? I need for using a Pewerpoint 2007 (to display presenter view differs from audience view).
Many thanks for an answer in advance.

Hi smit_Aood,
The NB520 supports one external monitor and you can use internal + external monitor at the same time (two monitors are supported). Furthermore you can choose if you want to extend the desktop on second monitor or clone it.
Using FN+F5 key combination you can switch between different modes.
Last but not least you can also use a Beamer or TV as second monitor. A certain computer monitor is not required. ;)

Create folders with multiple language support

How can folders be created supporting multiple languages?
I am using Mac OS X with English as my native language. As I would like to have several folders named in Japanese this causes some trouble: It is no problem to name them using Japanese characters, but if I navigate through these folders using the Terminal as I often do the names will only appear like "???????????????????" even if I use 'export LCALL="jaJP.UTF-8"' to get right character interpretation for the Terminal. There must be an alternative name support for folders as I tried to create folders while I switched to Japanese as my native language for Mac OS X and all standard user folders switched to Japanese language. In the Terminal these folders still appear in international English language. And also when I copy those folders to an external hard drive the multiple language support will stay alive. But I still didn't find out how new folders created by myself will get multiple language support. Any hints?
Thanks in advance.
Kyoshiro

Tom Gewecke wrote:
Unfortunately I have to switch between Romaji and Hiragana/Katakana input method every time I have to spell japanese folder names. (Tab completion doesn't work at all for these folders.)
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean there. Where are you spelling the names? In Terminal?
Yes, I meant typing Japanese characters in the Terminal. It works but it's very uncomfortable as shortcuts to switch the input method don't work while writing commands in the Terminal. Standard folders like "Documents", "Pictures" etc. appear in English in the Terminal even if the localization has been switched to an other language. (So there is no need to switch the input method while working in the Terminal.)
In case the folders are stored on an external drive (even if it's fat) and it's plugged in on another computer they appear in English likewise.
Self created folders normally won't have this ability. But to customize this behaviour is exactly what I am looking for. I guess the information about the "international aliases" must be in a hidden file or something like that.
That must certainly be part of the localization system for the OS. Here is some info:
http://developer.apple.com/internationalization/localization/tools.html
Thank you for the link, first I'll explore the tools. Maybe I'll find some useful information.
I'll return as soon as I need help again or if I found what I am searching for.
Thank you so far.
Kyoshiro

Can we with ligthroom have the sofware set up on multiples computer mac and mc and share the same dat base library?

can we with ligthroom have the sofware set up on multiples computer mac and mc and share the same dat base library?

No, a Lightroom catalog cannot be on a networked drive, and can only be accessed by a single user at a time.

Feature Request - Better Multiple Monitor Support

Lightroom's support for a second display has definitely helped my workflow. I hope the team will consider adding more flexible multiple monitor support in version 4. Here's why.
I've recently experimented with running one of my three screens in portrait mode. When this screen hosts Lightroom's secondary display window in Loupe view, my verticals finally get equal real estate for editing. While I've not done hard statistics on my library, I know more than 50% of my imagery is in portrait orientation.
I'd like to see LR V4 support three or more screens so I could set up as follow:
Screen 1 - main lightroom interface, would not need to be calibrated, for controls and navigation
Screen 2 - Portrait orientation, loupe view - this would be a calibrated display, all develop changes to verticals would be judged on this screen
Screen 3 - Landscape orientation, loupe view - another calibrated display, all develop changes to horizontals would be judged on this screen
If Adobe could make the app intelligent enough to route the image to the correct screen based on orientation (recognizing and respecting cropping that could change orientation) my edit sessions would certainly speed up and I could maximize the productivity of multiple screens.
I'd be happy with this, but I'm also stymied by the need to switch back to Library mode to tag images when my primary workflow has me in develop. Ultimately everything depends on the quality of the image. Before I invest in image-specific meta data, I have to process or at least "test-process" an image. IMO the Quick Develop panel is useless, once you become accustomed to the granular control of the develop sliders, it just doesn't cut it.
In the three monitor setup I described above I'd love to be able to configure screen 1, with a combination of panels from Library and Develop, so I could stay "develop centric" with immediate access to keywording and meta. The two additional screens would intelligently handle image display.
I think this might speed my workflow by 33% and having just returned from a Tour de France project that generated 23,000 images I need all the productivity help I can get.

VeloDramatic wrote:
Thanks for all those votes Rob. Now we just need to get the other 999,999 on board.
Actually, this topic has come up a lot on this forum. At this point, I think we just need to get Adobe on board.
VeloDramatic wrote:
There may be another thread for this one additional thought. If Adobe does improve multiple monitor support, we should be able to optimize our previews for those screens. Even after prerendering 1:1 previews there are issues with DEVELOP doing its own thing (I believe) each time a new image is loaded. I make extensive use of the PREVIOUS button moving through my shoots and there's always a lag of one or two seconds while the develop preview loads before the button is active. In a desktop environment where multiple screens allow landscape and portrait images to be displayed full screen I'd argue that 100% of the host screen resolution would be the ideal preview. Hope that made sense.
Yes, faster switching would be nice. I'm not sure what that would take. As it stands, there's like "9" previews generated when you do 1:1s - 100% down to tiny thumbnails. Still, one at exact monitor size that does not need to be resized at all does seem like it would be the fastest - I'm a bit on a limb though at this point.
Rob

Page size that I have to put my site to see the same on a computer supports both laptop and a desktop computer ?

page size that I have to put my site to see the same on a computer supports both laptop and a desktop computer ?

The viewport on a computer is adjustable by the user. iWeb sets the viewport width to the page width that you chose in the layout menu. No matter what the end user does, the page width is static and a reasonable compromise for the width of a web page that will be viewed on these devices is 980 to 1024 px.
Safari on iOS devices cannot set the viewport. The viewport on mobile devices is fixed and its width depends on the orientation of the device. The iPhone in portrait mode has a viewport width of 320px. This means that the 980px wide iWeb built page will be squashed down to about one third of its desired size making it unreadable and difficult to navigate.
Setting the viewport meta tag so that width equals the device width is a futile gesture since Safari on iOS will do that anyway. Its only useful if you add some initial scaling like...
<meta name = "viewport" content="initial-scale=0.7">
In the case of a 980px wide website, the initial scale is about 0.3 so any value higher than this will magnify the initial view of the site.
Here's an example of a 980px wide page that has been given and initial scale of 0.7 which allows an iPhone user to see one column of a two column layout...

Multiple Browser Support in Webcenter

What are the code changes that are to be made to have Multiple browser support in Webcenter?
what is done in Webcenter to provide to browser independent UI
e,g in jsp , we usually write javascript
if browser is this, do this
else do this
kind of logic

Even When I use JSTL and have modified the code to the following
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<jsp:root xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" version="2.1"
xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
xmlns:c="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core"
xmlns:fn="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/functions"
xmlns:af="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/rich">
<jsp:directive.page contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8"/>
<f:view>
<af:document id="d1">
<af:form id="f1">
<c:choose>
<c:when test="${fn:containsIgnoreCase(header('User-Agent'), 'MSIE 6.0')}">
<c:out value="Its IE6"/>
</c:when>
<c:otherwise>
<c:out value="Its others"/>
</c:otherwise>
</c:choose>
</af:form>
</af:document>
</f:view>
</jsp:root>
i get error on compile that says
Error(12,16): The function "header" for prefix "" can not be found in the specified tag library.

Multiple language support

A few questions:
1) Does the report viewer control have multiple language support? I could not find a way to resource the status bar, toolbar tooltips, or subsequent dialogs.
2) Is there a way to support multiple languages in the reports? I'm thinking of inspecting all ReportObjects in the ReportDefinition, but I'm wondering if there's a less invasive way of handling this.
3) Is there a way to determine the last page number of a report? I understand that not all pages are loaded initially and I'm ok with that limitation, but I can find no way to determine if the user's reached the last page other than looking at the enabled state of the "Last Page" button in the toolbar.
Any assistance is appreciated.

1. Yes we support multiple languages. Go here http://devlibrary.businessobjects.com/BusinessObjectsXIR2SP2/en/devsuite.htm then check out Crystal Reports .NET SDK > Tutorials and Sample Code > Other Tutorials > Configuring Multilingual Client Support.
2. This depends on what you mean by supporting multiple languages? Do you mean you want the entire report, including data to be in another language? If so then this is up to you. We don't translate the data. We only translate the tooltips, toolbar, and regionalize the data formats. You can either switch to a different data table for the correct language, create a formula to translate for you, or create a custom UFL and subscribe to a translation service to translate the data for you.
3. Yes. Check out note 1216240 here https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/businessobjects-notes.

Multiple Monitor support using RDP in Windows 10

Does anyone know if you can use multiple monitors when connecting through RDP in Windows 10? In Windows 7, you need to be using Windows 7 Ultimate in order for RDP to support more than one monitor.
For example, my home setup has (2) 22" monitors and I want to RDP to my work PC which also has (2) 22" monitors. We are running windows 7 Pro, so only one monitor would display on my home PC and I couldn't view my 2nd work monitor.
Thanks!

Michalsm2000,
I can't test that due to the shortage of resources.
For the RDP multiple Monitor support, it should be supposed to work on Windows 10.
Regarding what is new in RDP, you may check:
What's New in Remote Desktop Services in the Windows Server Technical Preview
Regards
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

What Multiple GPU Support??

I just purchased a very pricey Mac Pro for my company, with the intention of utilizing it's dual GPUs & processing power for fast turnaround times on video projects. Turning on GPU acceleration in Premiere, however, essentially renders this machine useless. I can use Premiere (GPU acceleration on) with a single monitor, but as soon as I hook up a 2nd, I have no playback anywhere. No video signal from the program feed or the preview window. My question is, why has Adobe not provided multiple GPU support for a graphics card that currently ships in brand new Macs (ATI Radeon HD5770)? Side note, there are no driver updates for this GPU on the AMD website either. This is very frustrating and disappointing. Next logical question: How quickly will Adobe respond to this screw up?

I think some things need to be clarified here...
digitalkiln wrote:
As far as waiting for a new Mac Pro you might not even get better performance than what would be possible on your current Mac Pro since the new one doesn't have NVIDIA cards and it hasn't been benchmarked.
You're right that they don't have nVidia chips in them, but it's very likely they'll perform quite well when compared to yesterday's Mac Pro. Specially since the rig has enough power available to drive two of them. Also, read my previous post: the IVB Xeons are nothing to sneeze at.
Personally, I prefer nVidia, and I also prefer not using Thunderbolt for storage. So a new Mac Pro isn't for me. But it may be others.
Alternatively you can keep one 5770 in one slot, sell the other and pick up a used Quadro 4000 for another slot on ebay for $200-$300.
Please, whatever you do, DON'T follow that suggestion. Q4Ks are turds, and hyper-expensive ones at that. Talk about WAY old technology.
Oh, and Jim: it's probably time to punt this to Hardware.

PBR Multiple Tracking Support information for Cat2960

                  Hello
I have been investigating for PBR multiple tracking support devices specially Catalyst 2960.
The following is very similar to this information. However it can not be applicable to Cat2960.
[PBR Support for Multiple Tracking Options]
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/iproute_pi/configuration/guide/iri_prb_mult_track_external_docbase_0900e4b1810fe379_4container_external_docbase_0900e4b181525fed.html#wp1056119
But feature navigator can show the following information of this feature.
[Feature Navigator for Cat2960]
PBR Support for Multiple Tracking Options
IOS:12.2(55)SE1
Feature-Set:LAB-Base
You can find it by using the research feature and filter by PBR.
So which is correct ?
Basically Cat2960 can not support PBR or there is any related information based on the feature navigator's info.
Any information would be very helpful.
Thank you very much and Best Regards,
Masanobu Hiyoshi

Hello Julio
Thank you for your precious information!
In my understanding it is conclution that the Catalyst 2960 & 2960S series
basically do not support for PBR. So PBR multiple tracking also do not support right?
Here is the output of Cat2960 and 3750X
2960#sh sdm prefer
The current template is "lanbase-routing" template.
The selected template optimizes the resources in
the switch to support this level of features for
0 routed interfaces and 255 VLANs.
number of unicast mac addresses:                        4K
number of IPv4 IGMP groups + multicast routes:    0.25K
number of IPv4 unicast routes:                              4.25K
    number of directly-connected IPv4 hosts:             4K
    number of indirect IPv4 routes:                            0.25K
number of IPv6 multicast groups:                           0.375k
number of directly-connected IPv6 addresses:        0.75K
number of indirect IPv6 unicast routes:                  0.5K
number of IPv4 policy based routing aces:             0
number of IPv4/MAC qos aces:                            0.125k
number of IPv4/MAC security aces:                      0.375k
number of IPv6 policy based routing aces:             0
number of IPv6 qos aces:                                     0.375k
number of IPv6 security aces:                              127
[3750X]
As you know by default Cat3750X normally requires SDM template as routing for
functioning PBR. Otherwise the number of IPv4 policy based routing aces
does not increase.
3750X(config-if)#ip policy route-map PBR
Mar 30 01:34:21.869: %PLATFORM_PBR-4-SDM_MISMATCH: PBR requires sdm template routing
3750X#sh sdm prefer
The current template is "desktop routing" template.
The selected template optimizes the resources in
the switch to support this level of features for
8 routed interfaces and 1024 VLANs.
number of unicast mac addresses:                       3K
number of IPv4 IGMP groups + multicast routes:    1K
number of IPv4 unicast routes:                             10.875k
    number of directly-connected IPv4 hosts:           3K
    number of indirect IPv4 routes:                          7.875k
number of IPv6 multicast groups:                        64
number of directly-connected IPv6 addresses:      0
number of indirect IPv6 unicast routes:                32
number of IPv4 policy based routing aces:          0.5K
number of IPv4/MAC qos aces:                          0.375k
number of IPv4/MAC security aces:                   0.875k
number of IPv6 policy based routing aces:          0
number of IPv6 qos aces:                                  0
number of IPv6 security aces:                           58
So what could you think about the feature navigator's information related to this?
Is it possible to modify it? or request to cisco for this?
Best Regards,
Masanobu Hiyoshi

Multiple language support using UFL (or not)

Dear forum members,
I saw in another thread that it's possible to get a multiple language support within CR.
I have to implement that functionality in my reports and I saw that it would be possible using a UFL but I dont really know how to do that.
The text to be traduced is in a database, I have many ideas to deal with it but they are heavy or not really right.
This issue must have been solved by someone before...
Any keys?
Thanks in advance.

Not a trivial task. You will essentially have to create a UFL that converts wide char to MBCS and passes it back to report formulas. E.g. all of the fields that need to be translated will have to be in a formula - that is how UFLs work.
For more discussion, see these forum threads;
Multiple language support
Crystal Reports localization issue
English resource files
Also, see this help file:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms227600(VS.80).aspx
Ludek

RemoteFX - None of the physical graphics processing units (GPUs) on this computer support RemoteFX.

I've been searching for some days straight to fix this issue but no success so far, I've already saw in other forums and topics here in TechNet with people facing the same issue. Here is the scenario:
Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard
All Windows Updates available until today installed
i7-2600K CPU
NVidia GTX 480 card with the latest driver installed from the manufacturer's site
Remote Desktop Virtualization Host installed
Right after I've installed the graphics driver I opened the Hyper-V Manager Console, right click on my server name, hit properties and selected the Physical GPUs then it was listing my GPU so I thought it was everything fine went to the VM property to add the
RemoteFX Adapter but it was greyed out, tried with the Powershell commands and no success so I rebooted the server and now in the properties of Hyper-V it says "None of the physical graphics processing units (GPUs) on this computer support RemoteFX. Use
of a RemoteFX 3D video adapter requires at least one physical GPU that supports RemoteFX.
From what I've searched it seems like a driver problem but already tried the latest from Nvidia website and some from Windows Update Catalog website.

Hi Rodrigo,
"I rebooted the server and now in the properties of Hyper-V it says "None of the physical graphics processing units (GPUs) on this computer support RemoteFX. "
For troubleshooting , please run "dxdiag.exe" to check the properties of your GPU after restart .
More details please refer to the article below :
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/16652.remotefx-vgpu-setup-and-configuration-guide-for-windows-server-2012.aspx#What_types_of_vGPU_are_supported_with_RemoteFX
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Multiple computer syncing

Is this even posible. I have multiple computer 1 main at the office and two at home (all mac of cause) can i sync on them without deleting what was sync on the other? Just need to know if anyone had success with this issue.

You can sync different content with different computers. For example, you could synch your contacts and calendar with your office computer, and your media (music, videos, etc.) from your home computer.
The details are in this article:
http://www.macworld.com/weblogs/macword/2007/07/iphonesync/index.php

Can I communicate single PXI chassis with multiple computer using MXI

Can I communicate single PXI chassis with multiple computer using multiple MXI cards
we are using cvi with MXI we want to share channels for other computers Can we do with mxi

Yes this is possible when you use a PXI controller. Attached is a screenshot showing a possible configuration.
Jacob K || Applications Engineer || National Instruments
Attachments:
PXIMaster.png ‏20 KB

Multiple Computer support

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for