Multiple discounts are given at different levels of sales cycle

I have a requirement,
Multiple discounts are given at different levels of sales cycle(like opportunity, quotation etc), interlinked with document flows.
It must be assured that all the matchings must be taken into accounts and are displayed underneath each other.
ex:
discount simple : 15%
discount simple : 12%
special discount : 10%
Is it a standard functionality in SAP CRM or should we do enhancement to cope the functionality, if it is an enhancement any idea how to do that.
Regards,
Venki

For quick assistance post testable script.
Tree processing examples using recursive CTE:
http://www.sqlusa.com/bestpractices2005/organizationalchart/
Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
Free T-SQL Scripts
New Book / Kindle: Exam 70-461 Bootcamp: Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012

Similar Messages

Multiple discounts at different levels in sales cycle

Hi
I have a requirement,
Multiple discounts are given at different levels of sales cycle(like opportunity, quotation etc), interlinked with document flows.
It must be assured that all the matchings must be taken into accounts and are displayed underneath each other.
ex:
discount simple : 15%
discount simple : 12%
special discount : 10%
Is it a standard functionality in SAP CRM or should we do enhancement to cope the functionality, if it is an enhancement any idea how to do that.
Regards,
Venki

We have implemented following scenario.
1st level - FERT - MTO strategy - type 20
2nd level - HALB - No strategy
3rd level - ROH/VERP - No strategy

Multiple planning areas

Hi,
At what scenario we use multiple planning areas.pls help me
thanks,
chinni

HI Chinni ,
Following are some of the points which need Multiple Planning Areas .
1.Different functions want to see their respective data in their views ,for ex.sales ,production ,finances need to see their specific related key figures data .
2.Different Units of measure for planning products need different planning areas. 3.Multiple Currencies in which data is planned .
4.Planning levels i.e. Aggregated Level and Lowest level of detail which affects the performance .
5.Setting in planning area how each Key figure is aggregated and desaggregated
6 and in some cases where storage bucket profile which can be either controlled by maintaining different data views .
Pls reward points if it is helpful..
regds,
Digs

Playlists song all have different levels

I have noticed that since moving over to a mac from a wondows laptop, itunes playlists in my ipod are all at different levels.
Plus should I consolidate my library? Will it double up the coverage on my harddrive?

When you write 'different levels' I presume you mean different volumes?
If this is the case, check that the iTunes Sound Check option is set on your Mac: goto iTunes -> Preferences, click on the Playback section and tick the box labelled 'Sound Check'. When you next transfer songs to your iPod, the Sound Check settings will come across too.

OBIEE report from multiple facts at different levels

Currently we need to develop a report with columns from 3 different facts surrounded with conformed and non conformed dimensions at different levels.
After setting the hierarchial levels and putting the facts into single logical table with different sources OBIEE is generating 2 different queries and does a full outer join.
I would like to know how we can do a left outer join instead of full outer join between the 2 queries based on a common column?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Vinod,
The scenario provided in the link above doesnt match to my issue.
We need to develop a report from multiple fact tables at different levels with conformed & non conformed dimension columns.
I have 7 dimensions D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6 and D7 & two fact F1 and F2 tables.
F1 is tied to dimensions D1,D2,D3,D4,d5
F2 is tied to dimensions D3,D4,D5, D6 and D7.
In my report I have columns from D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, F1 and F2.
So OBIEE generates 2 queries with columns from D1,D2,D3,D4,d5 & F1 measure and another query with D3,D4,D5, D6, D7 and F2 measure.
and then does a cross fact join out of box between 2 queries.
But I need to do a left outer join between the 2 queries on a common column instead of cross fact join. I would like to know how we can achive this.
Thanks.

Why are all the sound levels so different!?? With VST's and in Ultrabeat...

I'm having so much trouble with the audio levels in logic pro. It seems every VST has a completely different level when the volume on the vst is set to 100. Miroslav Philharmonik is EXTREMELY quiet..., and when I load drums into ultrabeat, they immediately peak like crazy. I tried loading my drums up in battery 3 after that, and all the drums where extremely quiet compared to my other vst's YET it showed in the mixer that they were peaking????? I don't understand what's happening, I know you have to mix but this never happened in any other daw that I've used.

I'm having so much trouble with the audio levels in logic pro. It seems every VST has a completely different level when the volume on the vst is set to 100. Miroslav Philharmonik is EXTREMELY quiet..., and when I load drums into ultrabeat, they immediately peak like crazy.
It's one of a the reasons mixers have volume controls.
Seriously - an orchestral instrument is likely to have hundreds of parts all playing at once. If each part was designed to hit close to 0dB, then it would be impossible to do anything as the resultant mix would be massively loud - you'd have to turn everything down all the time.
Drums are probably going to be peaking fairly loud in a mix, as they do contain a lot of the energy.
There is no standard. A mono synth will often have hotter levels than a polysynth part, as the polysynth could be playing 8-32 voices all at once. Also, different patches, and different instruments themselves will be programmed to have different volume levels.
This is all true regardless of DAWs, and is nothing specifically to do with Logic.
All all the instruments, and mixer channels have volume controls, to let you control their volume and place them where they need to be for your needs.

Is there and app that does the following. Multiple apps are showing a clock in different rooms, all are synced together, one ipad is a master ipad and if you change the time on it all other ipads change the time

Is there and app that does the following. Multiple apps are showing a clock in different rooms, all are synced together, one ipad is a master ipad and if you change the time on it all other ipads change the time

None of the spreadsheet apps that work with Excel files offer anything like full native support in iOS. Apple's own Numbers app pairs down features for the iOS version. The hardware is simply not up to what a true computer is capable of, so all apps like QuickOffice, DocumentsToGo, Numbers and so forth offer reduced features from their computer-version counterparts.
I think a custom app will be your only real choice, be it a fully standalone app, or something built in filemaker or some other db-based platform.

Multiple different level accounts in iPads?

Hello.
Is there a way to set different level accounts on a single Apple iPad Air with the (lat/new)est iOS v8.1.3?
Thank you in advance.

It's not possible. The iPad was originally meant to be a single user portable portal to iTunes. So there's no support for separate logins or user access levels.
Say you have 3 users for an iPad, you can make separate folders and put each person's apps in a folder (there is the limit in that you can only have one copy of an app on the iPad_...so let's say it's like my sister who puts my niece's games in her folder. But there's nothing that restricts my niece from accessing mommy or daddy's apps beyond telling and teaching her 'no, don't do that'
Apple's work flow is that each person has their own iPad or is open in their sharing if they share it with others.

Multiplying data at two different levels

I have Actual Forecast Bias data generated at a particular level (%Bias). I want to multiply this against other data that is at a different level in the same cube so as to adjust the forecast in line with actual performance. The Bias% data is at Battery Part# level. The data that I want to multiply it against is Appliance/Battery level. When I run it, the multiplication operates against a rolled up consumption level for all appliances that use a particular battery. I need the Bias % to operate at the battery level, not the rolled up level..
I'm a newbi at this so any help welcome
See the code below
FIX (Batteries, @IDESCENDANTS ("A Size Family"),appliances,ww,@idescendants(NA));
"New forecast %" = #Missing;
"Bias %" = #Missing;
"Bias %" = ("trade units" -> Actual/"trade units");
ENDFIX;
FIX("wif 1")
FIX (@LEVMBRS(appliances,1),@levmbrs(Batteries,0), @IDESCENDANTS ("A Size Family"),ww,@idescendants(NA));
"New forecast %" = consumption*"Bias %";
ENDFIX;
ENDFIX;
FIX("wif 1")
CALC DIM (WW, Supplies, Printers);
ENDFIX;

Hi Johnnie
I assume the important bit is the bit within the second fix:
"New Forecast" = Consumption * "Bias %";
The way you have your fix statement set up it is looking at level 0 members in your Appliances and Batteries dimensions (I'm reading your post as if they are separate dimensions). I assume your issue is that the one piece of data is at level 0 interesections of appliances and batteries but the other piece is not possibly at level 0 of one dimension and level 1 or higher of the other, Bias% being the one at the higher level?
If that is the case then I think you need to look at a way of getting from the level 0 member to the correct intersection point(s).
Have you had a look through the technical reference at functions like @PARENTVAL, @ANCESTVAL or the multidimensional options for the same @MDPARENTVAL and @MDANCESTVAL, it sounds like your formula needs to be something along the following lines
"New Forecast" = Consumption * @PARENTVAL(Appliances, "Bias%");
What the above would do differently to your original code would be to get the Bias % value from the parent of the current level 0 member of the appliance dimension being calculated. While this might not be exactly what your requirement is hopefully it will steer you in the right direction.
Hope this helps
Stuart

Multiple MRP areas to be handled with MD04

Hello to all,
my scope is to advice the user in MD04 when there are other MRP-Areas for the same material in the same plant and maybe offer a function to jump there directly. I am looking for suggestions how to solve this, maybe one of you did it already...
Thanks to all
Joerg

Hi ,
Yes u can use multiple MRP area for the single plant & SAp has given Provision to go to differant MRP area from MD04 , only u have to cchange the MRP area option in the MD04 screen , you will directly jump to given MRP area of that material & u will get the stock & MRp element details of the selected ,material.
Regards
satish

Valuation Area at Company Code level

Hi,
In what ideal business case/industry one should set valuation area at company code level when SAP recommends valuation area must be set at Plant level ? in other words..what is the practical purpose of Valuation area at company Code level?

Hi
Think that valuation area link with records in table MBEW. So, if you have a company with 3 plants, and you have a single valuation for all company, in 3 plants the valuation of materials are the same, with their implications in valuation of stock and valuation of margin in sales (remember that this value can flow -really, use to flow- to condition VPRS in SD, well see SAP Note 1365939 - VPRS logic and Customizing settings in SD and SAP Note 547570 - FAQ: VPRS in pricing for more details). If you do a valuation different by plant, stock and margin calculations are different.
What are the elements that you must considerer?
1. If the materials is purchased, think if the same material have different conditions (different conditions in MM, for instance, indirect costs as shipment costs, different vendor with meaningful differences in prices or discounts). It's indiferent that it is a raw material or a material that you can sell. The raw material will work in product costing as an item in BOM. First of all, considerer the impact in stock value, second think how is delivered the materials to customer from plants and their impact in profitability analysis. If there are meaningful differences for the same material between different plants and you give the same value in all company, depending of the mix perhaps your customer is fooling himself about this issue.
2. If the material is manufactured, talk with your CO consultant and what kind of impact could have different routings, BOM and prices of raw materials between plants. Same considerations for valuation of stocks and margin.
Finally, in the page 10 of the document you can read
Valuation must be at Plant level in the following cases:
u2022If you want to use the application component Production Planning (PP) or Costing
u2022If your system is a SAP Retail system
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo
PD: I forgot, talk this with the CFO of the company, taking in account the restrictions (when it must be plant level).
Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Nov 23, 2011 9:23 AM
Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Nov 23, 2011 9:24 AM

Calculate based on different level-based measures

Hi,
Say that I have a Sales measure and a Region dimension as the following:
Region: Country -> State -> City -> Individual Stores
The Sales measure is aggregated by SUM along the dimension. I'd like to create another measure that when the user browses to each level, the measure calculates the ratio of the current Sales measure to its immediate parent level's aggregated Sales total.
For example, at the City level, the ratio will be City.Sales / State.Sales. At the individual store level, the ratio will be IndividualStores.Sales / City.Sales.
I know I can probably create one total Sales level-based measure at each level. But then that would give me multiple ratio measures as well, which I don't want. Is there any way to have only ONE ratio measure that reflects the ratio at each level depending what level the user is viewing?
Thanks.

JLin,
I think you were right when you were saying that you could create several metrics. I looked at your requirement again and realized that those are indeed separate metrics - since they use different columns for sales. So you can:
a) create aggregate tables and set LTS there (easiest I think)
b) adjust your ETL by creating a pre-calculated column based on your requirements
c) create a long CASE statement - but I'm still not sure how to define hierarchies....variables perhaps...maybe MMA could shed some light into it....
good luck

Multiple Discount in Invoice PLD

Hi Members,
I have designed a PLD In which there are fields to display discount percentage and discount amount at the report footer.
I should display the discount percentage and discount amt if the item details has uniform discount given.
Say for e.g if there are 3 items and alll 3 items is having uniform 5% discount, so i should display Discount 5% and discount amt.
But if the items has multiple discount say one item has 2% and others has 5% discount given. I should not display the discount percent in report footer.I should only display Discount and its Disc amt.Also if there is no discount in Item details the discount and discount amount should not be displayed.
Kindly suggest an solution to solve this issue.
Regards,
Venkatesh.R

Hi Venkatesh,
You could show line discount in PLD (Field_XX1) and use a hidden formula field (Field_XX2) with ReportSum ("Field_XX1").
Then add another hidden formula field (Field_XX3) to divide Field_XX by the last Linenum().
Then the third field (Field_XX4) with (Field_XX1)==(Field_XX3)
Finally link (Field_XX4) to your discount fields.
Thanks,
Gordon

Manage three different Levels of iOS?

Well, I now have three devices, all maxed out at different levels of iOS. Old iPad is two updates behind and maxed, I discovered that my old iPod Touch won't update to iOS7, so it's maxed, and my iPhone 5 updated normally. So... how do I juggle what apps will run on what device? They all updated automatically so I now have 11 (11 apps!) the only work on one device. Clearly I need to keep downgraded copies of them to run on my other devices. Actually, TWO copies, since I have 3 devices at three levels.
BTW, all these devices are functional and good, so no 'buy new' suggestions. Also it's not reasonable that I drive them from one computer, so please no "buy two more computers" suggestions. Thanks.

AlexArod:
Welcome to the Apple Discussions.
I use iWebSites to manage multiple sites.. It lets me create multiple sites and multiple domain files.
If you have multiple sites in one domain file here's the workflow I used to split them into individual site files with iWebSites. Be sure to make a backup copy of your Domain.sites files before starting the splitting process.
This lets me edit several sites and only republish the one I want.
Do you Twango?

MC placed multiple times and given same instance name?

Hi everyone, I am pretty new to code in flash.
I am mostly used to use object oriented programming, but in flash I'm doing everything in one frame.
I am making a car game. Kinda GTA style, but very simple. You are a police car, and you chase a theif through a city.
The theif uses ground nodes to know where he can drive, and where he can turn.
basically, below is the stage. I have placed these objects directly onto the stage, and given some of them instance names.:
|      O
| O ©
|            _______________________
|            |
|            |
|            |
|            |
|      ^     |
|      |     |
|     X     |
The © is a MC named node_switch.
The O's are the two objects of the same MC, which both are named node_stop
The X is the theif (mc), and he is driving upward along the road.
When theif hits node_switch, he will look up,down, left and right if any node_stop is placed.
This is done with hitTestObject. the theif has invisible "beams" in all 4 directions, inside it's MC.
The problem is as following:
When multiple nodes are placed on the stage, the theif only collides with one of them.
As I said, they have the same instance name.
Is there a way to be able to place them directly on the stage, give them all the same instance name, and make a for loop where it goes through all of them and checks collision?
Edit:
Or is it maybe possible to place them directly on the stage, give them instance names such as "node_switch01", "node_switch02", and then check for them all at the same time in a for loop, or in some other way? there will be lots of nodes, so...

If you name them all differently you will have an easier time of it. To loop thru them with the naming convention you suggested you can use the bracket notation, though it would be easier to get rid of the leading zeroes...
for (var i:uint=1; i<=numNodes; i++){
     if(thief.hitTestObject(this["node_switch"+String(i)]){
          // don't go this way

Multiple discounts are given at different levels of sales cycle

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for