Multiple ECDP Copies Required

Hi,
For the direct material procurement, if I have 10 PO document types in back-end system, then do I have to create 10 additional transaction types by copying ECDP?
Kindly please guide.
Thanks and best regards
Jack

Hi
Yes, as per standard you have to create individual transaction types by copying ECDP. You can think of any custom development for mapping the transaction type with some paramaters as per requirement.
Thanks
Kiran

Similar Messages

  • Smartforms - Multiple original copies

    Hi,
    In smartforms I would like to print multiple original copies as well as multiple duplicate copies of BOL layout.
    I know tdcopies parameter has multiple duplicate copies and 1 original copy.But I need multiple originals,how do I do?
    Thanks,
    Bala

    Hi Saurabh,
    Our requirement is we have additional data tabstrip customized screen in Sales Order screen.In this we have values in the fields like originals 5 duplicates 6.
    Based on this above values our layout should print 5 originals and 6 duplicates print out.
    I think sfsy-copycount0 prints only one original..How do I print multiple originals.
    Regards,
    Bala

  • I'm running an iBook G4. On occasion, a black and white display appears (in multiple languages) and requires restarting by holding the power button.

    I'm running an iBook G4. On occasion, a black and white display appears (in multiple languages) and requires restarting by holding the power button.

    What you are seeing is a kernel panic.
    Check out the X Lab's article on Resolving Kernel Panics. Maybe something there will help.

  • Is it possible to have multiple pause the require view to click "continue" button to proceed?

    Is it possible to have multiple pauses the require view to click "continue" button to proceed?

    1. Turn the video into a symbol.
    2. Set stage, symbol and video to not autoplay.
    3. Set play in the video playback at the start of the video timeline.
    4. Set pause in the video playback at the prefered time on symbol timeline.
    Once I convert it to a symbol , the pause funtion is not showing on playback.
    5. Zoom in as much as you can on symbol timeline and set trigger "stop all" for the symbol right after the pause playback marking.
    6. Set play in the video playback right after the "stop all trigger" marking.
    7. Create button with action play symbol.
    You can now play a video which will stop at a pre set pause, and make it countinue to run by clicking the play button again.

  • Call Library node and multiple array copies

    Hey everyone,
    I am trying to do the following using a hybrid of C and Labview:
    1.) Create an array in Labview
    2.) Pass the array into 2 seperate DLLs at the same time
    3a.) One DLL modifies the data and then updates a flag.  For example, the array created in 1 in 100,000 units long, this DLL modifies 999 units in one pass and updates the 1000th unit to say that the 999 units have been succesfully written.  It would do this 100 times in this example.
    3b.) The 2nd DLL checks the flag unit set in 3a, and if the flag is a certain value, the 2nd DLL reads the 999 units modified in 3a and performs operations on them.
    Note:  There is no read/write conflict here, since the only way 3b operates on the memory is if 3a has completed its operations and updated the flag.
    The problem:
    Labview creates 3 copies of the same array in memory.  Once in step 1, and 1 for each DLL.  This is problematic since the 2 DLLs can't communicate with each other anymore in the way that is described above, since the method above requires that the DLLs in 3a and 3b operate on the same memory locations.
    The question:
    How can I prevent Labview from creating multiple copies at the Call Library node so that my DLLs can operate on the same chuck of memory that is created in step 1.
    Thanks,
    Austin McElroy

    AustinMcElroy wrote:
    Ok, so as nk said, even if the idea is terrible why is Labview making extra copies?  If I have 2 DLLs in serial to avoid the flag idea, and I am working with  datarates of 100MB/s coming off of my acq. card, that is  100MB allocated for the initial array, 100MB allocated for the first DLL and 100MB allocated for the 2nd DLL, per second.  Perhaps even more allocations and copying from C back into Labview (I am unsure of this, I will test it tomorrow).  This is alot of memory being allocated and copied extraneously.  Is there a way to prevent Labview from doing this?
    And LabVIEW doesn't make copies if it doesn't need too. For this to work however you need to pass the array through the CLN (input it on the left side and output it at the right side of the CLN and from there wire it to the next function), not branch it. That should even work if you configure the array parameter to be a C array data pointer (since LabVIEW will pass the pointer to the actual data to the DLL), but it definitly works without copies for LabVIEW array handles.
    Then LabVIEW won't make a copy (except maybe in some older versions).
    If  you branch the wire however, LabVIEW has no choice but to create at
    least one copy to satisfy data flow contraints.
    This doesn't mean that the first DLL function could store the array pointer and operate on it after it has returned since a C function once returning control to the caller has absolutely no control over a pointer it got passed anymore. At the time your DLL might decide to access that pointer LabVIEW quite likely might have left the diagram already and consequently deallocated or reused the handle for something else, causing your DLL to corrupt memory. Even if you decide to use events to signal the second function to not return before the data has been modified by the first, you create a monster of complexity that will sooner or later blow in your face. Either the user might decide to abort the programm mid term and your second function never receives the signal so never returning, making your application simply hang in there with no other option than to kill it through the task manager, or someone will go modify your little program not knowing the (unlogical) dependency of those two calls and creating something that simply works very wrong or if you are very lucky will crash with an access violation exception early on.
    Rolf Kalbermatter
    Message Edited by rolfk on 03-24-2008 01:39 PM
    Rolf Kalbermatter
    CIT Engineering Netherlands
    a division of Test & Measurement Solutions

  • Multiple file copies just randomly miss a few of the files

    This is something that has happened to me on all networks I've used. My home network (gigabit LAN or 802.11n), work network, and any client network I've ever been on while supporting.
    I can select say 10 files on my MBP in finder. And either copy/paste or just drag to copy onto an SMB share (windows 2003 at home for my windows home server, also 2008 and 2008 R2 servers at work and clients). And the file copy goes fine. I see the progress window, it goes and I see the files populating the network share as it progresses. It runs the normal amount of time I'd expect for the speed of the network, and when it's done I get my sound. Then anywhere from three to nine of the files just disappear off the network share as the copy finishes. So it takes the time to copy them but does not complete.
    And it's not an every time thing. And it ONLY happens with multiple files, i NEVER have a problem doing files singularly. The same files that fail in a batch go fine when I copy them one by one in the same session after it failed doing them all at once.
    No errors on the windows side of things in the logs, disks are fine. Never happens with my MBP when I do it from windows either via VMware or booting directly into boot camp.
    No errors on the mac side, for all intents and purposes it completed successfully. Yet almost every time I do group copies, only a couple actually are on that network share when all is said and done.
    No AV or firewall on the server at the moment so it happens whether I have them enabled or uninstalled. No AV on the MBP.
    And no disconnects, etc. I'm watching things in an RDP session while the copy is happening and I never lose the network, it never drops. Downloads that I sometimes have going on are working just fine, everything is just perfect in every respect as far as networking goes, except for those copying of multiple files.
    Saw someone else had disabled write caching on the windows machine to overcome an actual error they had, and i had tried that in this instance long ago to no avail.
    This has happened since I first bought the laptop in July of '09 and it was running leopard, and has continued through every single version update since. Wired or wireless...
    Thanks for any suggestions.

    hey JDThree, i'm having the SAME EXACT PROBLEM!!! i've tried restarting both my server and my MBP, and it does the job a bit, but it's so random. even doing a single file copy doesn't seem to work. i tried copying over one file, then when it finished and was on the server, i copied the next file, and it removed the first file. so strange. anybody have any ideas?

  • Implementing multiple page size requirement - extra blank page at the end

    My XMLP report requirement is as follows.
    - The report is printing a bunch of lines.
    - Based on data and layout requirement, lines are grouped into page where they belong (due to complex logic for determining which page a line should go to...this is done in PL/SQL package that is called in the beginning of the RDF trigger)
    - The first page needs to be printed on Legal size paper
    - Subsequent pages (IF NEEDED) need to be printed on Letter size paper
    So some report will have a 1-page output (legal size), and some will have multiple pages (1st page should be legal size, subsequent on letter size).
    Here is a sample XML data:
    <REPORT>
    <LIST_G_PAGE_NUMBER>
    <G_PAGE_NUMBER>
    <PAGE_NUMBER>1</PAGE_NUMBER>
    <LIST_G_LINE>
         <G_LINE>...</G_LINE>
         <G_LINE>...</G_LINE>
    </LIST_G_LINE>
    </G_PAGE_NUMBER>
    <G_PAGE_NUMBER>
    <PAGE_NUMBER>2</PAGE_NUMBER>
    <LIST_G_LINE>
         <G_LINE>...</G_LINE>
         <G_LINE>...</G_LINE>
    </LIST_G_LINE>
    </G_PAGE_NUMBER>
    <G_PAGE_NUMBER>
    <PAGE_NUMBER>3</PAGE_NUMBER>
    <LIST_G_LINE>
         <G_LINE>...</G_LINE>
         <G_LINE>...</G_LINE>
    </LIST_G_LINE>
    </G_PAGE_NUMBER>
    </LIST_G_PAGE_NUMBER>
    </REPORT>
    For this, I created 2-pages RTF template and using the Word Page Setup feature:
    1. First page setup is legal size (go to Page Setup, Paper tab, choose Letter and choose Apply to "Whole Document").
    The first page has the following XMLP tag:
    <?for-each: G_PAGE_NUMBER?>
    <?if: PAGE_NUMBER=1?><?call:body?><?end if?>
    <?end for-each?>
    <?template:body?>
    for-each loop that prints lines in a tabular format
    <?end template?>
    2. Second page setup is letter size (go to Page Setup, Paper, choose Letter and choose Apply to "This point forward").
    <?for-each: G_PAGE_NUMBER?>
    <?if: PAGE_NUMBER>1?><?call:body?><-- Ctrl-Break to insert a page break here --> <?end if?>
    <?end for-each?>
    It almost worked, except there is a blank page printed at the end. How do I remove the blank page? I have tried to use <?split-by-page-break:?> instead of the Ctrl-Break, but it did not seem to work (there is no page break happening at all).
    I think the extra page is due to the multiple page nature of the RTF template. Is there a way to control the page size through XMLP tag (or XSL-FO). With that, I can try having a single page template and put the page size control within the XMLP / XSL-FO tag and hope that the extra blank page at the end will go away. Can someone please help?
    Thank you!

    Sorry for the typo in my previous post... I meant Ctrl-Enter (not Ctrl-Break).

  • SRM MDM with Multiple Repositories and required S&A.

    Hello everyone,
    We are in the planning process to migrate from CCM to MDM. Our current environment has two separate customers running on two separate SAP clients in SRM 5.0 using the internal CCM (one SAP SRM instance, 2 separate SAP clients).
    In MDM it seems the concept of SAP client does not exist but the concept of an MDM Repository. I was thinking that by creating two dfifferent repositories (one for each customer) it would substitue the concept of the internal CCM on each SAP client.
    Can we have one MDM system with two separate repositories one for each of the existing customers with the required S&A?
    That is, customer A will logon to MDM to maintain only A's repository. Customer A must not be allowed to access B's repository and viceversa.
    Also, Repository A would be published only for users using SRM system under SAP Client A, and Repository B would be published only for users using SRM system under SAP Client B.
    The intention is that each customer will have their own electronic catalog.
    Thank you.
    Martin

    Hi Martin,
    The answer to your question is yes, it is possible to have one MDM system with two separate repositories one for each of the existing customers (that intend to have different electronic catalogs).
    In fact, I think this would be the best way to separate: 1. data sets, 2. access.
    1. Each MDM repository carries its own data set (like SAP client)
    2. Each MDM repository has its own security (users/passwords, roles, etc.)
    Another consideration (relates to point 1) is bringing data from SAP client (e.g. product master, contracts). Since you have two different SAP clients, managing replicated data from both of them in one MDM repository would be a form of suicide.
    You can have multiple repositories on one MDM server. A common case is when you have a staging (master) repository, and a production (slave) repository. The slave repository is what you show to searching end users; the master repository is for data loads. You synchronize the slave repository with any changes from the master at such time when you're sure the master is good to publish.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers,
    Serguei

  • Printing multiple page copies per sheet

    I am trying to print 4 pages per sheet in Adobe Acrobat Pro 9. I understand how to choose "multiple pages per sheet" in the print dialogue box, but instead of printing pages "1,2,3,4" on sheet #1, I'd like to print 4 copies of page 1 on sheet #1 (i.e. 1,1,1,1), 4 copies of page 2 on sheet #2, etc. I've found this possible by typing pages "1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2..." in the print range box. However, I have a 233 page document and the dialogue box cannot handle that many characters. Is there another way I can do it? Thanks!

    You can try Quite Imposing Plus 2.9.
    Just use your Step and Repeat feature. It doesn't matter how many pages you have.
    Just go to our site ww.quite.com and download the Demo (Mac or Windows).
    Here is a temporary number to test it with.
    Quite Imposing Plus V1/V2
      Expires end 5/2009  Serial 8773-0292-1788-1358  Code 6178
    Also, once loaded: Check out Getting Started tech sheet. Go to our Imposition Control Panel and click on the
    ? button.....then click the Getting Started button. Lots of good information on Step and Repeat, signature setups, Step-by-step
    Instructions and New features.
    You can also look at www.quite.com/imposing/techsheet .
    To see how to put on colorbars, setup cutstacks, etc.
    cheers,Charles
    Charles James
    Technical/Marketing Director
    Quite Software
    1527 Law Street
    San Diego, CA 92109
    USA
    858.581.9143
    [email protected]
    www.quite.com

  • Barcode label printing - 2 copies required

    Hi,
    The barcode label for TO is printing automatically but the user requires 2 copies instead of one. We have assigned the Spool code for 2copies in the print table in config  (OMLV). But still only one copy is getting printed.
    Please advise.
    Regards,
    Pratap

    Hi Pratap,
    Check the default settings for "no of copies" during executing the print command. If it shows 1 then you need to make it as 2. To make it as 2,
    during the print command,
    Go to Properties-->Specifications----->In field name select "No of copies", change the default value to 2 and click on "Copy settings".
    Edited by: Naidu Raghav on Aug 27, 2010 1:09 PM

  • Multiple file copies

    Before I buy Lightroom, I want to know if it will help me fix an issue I have.
    I've copied my Nikon D70 and D200 RAW files to multiple locations (C:\folder, C:\other folder, C;\other folder\subfolder, E:\yet another location, E:\this is dumb Fred) on one server while trying to consolidate hard drives and not over write files!
    This has created multiple duplicates and I don't want to loose any file that may have the same name at the OS level.
    I understand that Lightroom uses a data base to keep information about files and you can use this "off line"
    Can I map the server drives to my laptop, import the mapped drives into Lightroom and then go thru them disconnected?
    If I delete a file in Lightroom, does the actual deletion from the drive happen when the drives are "on line" again? Can I see "thumbnails" for the pictures during the "Off line"
    Thanks for your help, I couldn't find the answer in the FAQ

    Why not use the command to import into a new place, and keep "Don't import duplicate" in force? Then when you have brought everything in, you can delete all your copies, and then make a fresh back up.
    You can see the thumbs and 1:1 previews when the images are offline. As to deleting files you marked when offline, when you are online again, I am not sure but I think you have to select the photo and then hit Delete. Probably easier to mark with an x when offline.

  • Multiple line describe requirements

    I have a question regarding the describe requirement process.  We are currently using the describe requirement functionality for requests that are three line items or less, however the business has informed me that they need the ability to do multiple lines, as in up to 100 lines.  Given what we have implemented today, our current solution is not going to fit this new requirement.  My question is, how are other companies handling similar issues?  Is there other delivered transactions that I should look at that might fit this need?
    Best regards,
    Shawn O'Connor

    Hi Yann,
    I'm referring to transaction BBPSC01.  We are then selecting the describe requirement link.  This brings up six fields for the user to enter (Description, Internal Note, Quantity/UOM, Price/Currency, Category and Required on Date).  This process works fine for a small number of line items but we need a way to enter 100 line items in a time efficient manner.  As it exists right now the user would create their first line, then copy it to create a second line and update the data.  This is too cumbersome for a large number of line items.  I'm wondering if there is another way that is easier to enter multiple line items.
    Best Regards,
    Shawn O'Connor

  • Fax is like the Sorcerer's Apprentice sending multiple unwanted copies

    Help. I tried to FAX a single copy of two different documents to a friend this morning, and each time it kept sending multiple copies of the document and would not stop until I manually told the modem to hang up. I only knew this was happening because I called them as I was sending it to make sure they wer receiving it since they urgently requested me to send it to them. If anyone has any suggestions about how to prevent this from happening in the future, I would really appreciate your input. I really don't want to be wasting people's paper by sending a bunch of redundant FAXes.
    Another problem with the first document that I was trying to send, which was a web page, was that, the it should have contained more than one page, but it just kept sending the first page of the document, the first section of the web page. Do I need to save something like that as a pdf first for it to send all the pages?
    Thanks,
    erpilgrim

    After an hour or more on the phone today the Epson guy could only come to the conclusion that it's a hardware issue, leaving me with the decision whether to pay for a service visit or cut losses and go for a new, cheaper printer.

  • Premiere CS4 - Multiple tracks always require rendering regardless

    It used to be if you had for instance mutiple tracks and the top track was a DV-AVI file with 100% opacity and no filters, no rendering was required. Now it seems that if you have anything on the lower tracks, even if completely hidden by the top layer, rendering is always required and transcoding takes longer - sometimes considerably depending on what's on the lower layers though not seen. I actually have to completely remove sections of clips on the lower tracks to speed up transcoding. Just more unnecessary work and time.
    Forgive me if this has been discussed before, but I can not seem to find this precise issue among the slow rendering discussions.
    Bruce B

    I hope you've found the answer already, but it sound exactly what I've run into.
    My problem was that I upgraded from CS2 and then removed the suite once CS4 was running.
    If you have done the same thing, simply reinstall Premiere CS4 and it will work as it did for me.
    If not, I don't know what to tell you.
    Good luck,
    Dan

  • Multiple (Duplicate) COPA docs getting generated for VPRS upon multiple PGI

    Hi
    We have gone live on Jan 1 2009 and we noticed some errors in COPA documents
    In a particular case, referring to Sales Order 30001514, 2 PGI (POst Goods issue was done).. One for Qty 100,000 EA and second for 69920 EA
    Billing document generated COPA docs 1704, 1705, 1706.
    Document 1704 contains entire Qty of 169920 and entire Revenue and Entire Cost (VPRS Price)
    Document 1705 contains no qty, no revenue .. but the VPRS price for 100,000 EA
    Document 1706 contains no qty, no revenue .. but the VPRS price for 69920 EA
    This is not correct.. In COPA report, this will report a wrong picture to Management because the revenue is posted only once, but the cost is posted twice
    Pls provide a solution to stop this error and about how to rectify the wrong postings happened so far
    Regards
    Ajay

    Hi
    I got the solution to it... This was due to wrong settings in SD...
    We are using batch split and batch sub items were actually not relevant for pricing.. But.. in config they were made relevant for pricing
    We could resolve this with note 77414
    Regards
    Ajay

Maybe you are looking for