Multiple EDI Identifiers

My customer is a global organization. They are planning a single B2B implementation. They are not using a VAN and the initial TP is suggesting a very country oriented identifier. I was thinking that we need a single identifier to be used globally and that the DUNS Number might be an alternative to ensure something that is globally unique. Alternatively can B2B handle having multiple EDI Identifiers for the host trading partner?
I'd be grateful for comments/suggestions.
Thanks
Mike

Anuj,
I have defined a trading partner with multiple EDI Interchange IDs(for example: MarketInc, MarketInc2, MarketInc3 etc) However in the agreement i have chosen only "MarketInc" as the identifier.
I sent an 850 message with Interchange Sender Id=MarketInc3 and it is being processed successful..I was expecting it would fail because my agreement has only "MarketInc" as the identifier.
Ca you please give some insight why B2B is not failing this message? would appreciate your input.
Thanks.

Similar Messages

Handling multiple EDI transaction

Hi,
We are getting multiple EDI transactions (940, 850 etc) from our customer. I have defined one Sender Agreement with service interface as functional acknowledgment and one each for EDI transactions (with service interface 940 and service interface 850 etc) in the same configuration scenario.
There wil be only one communication channel to receive all the EDI files. My problem is whenever I send the EDI 850 transaction it is taking the service interface of 940. Because of that it is executing the 940 interface map instead of 850!!!
Am I doing any wrong in my configuration? When I test the data in test tab of configuration scenario, it is taking the correct service interface, but it is not happening in the run time... I cleared the cache also.. still no luck...
Can someone please help me in this? Please guide me if I am doing any wrong.
Regards,
Vas

Hi,
I assume that you are using Seeburger for EDI data handlings..if yes
sender interface details for the payload (850,940) will be determined from the seeburger workbench configurations ..
after bic mapping execution it will result in two doucments one with FunctionalAck and other with attachement(payload..can be 850 or 940) based on this attachment name will compare with the entries of seeburger workbench and fetches the sender details and based on this receiver will be identified...
Hope this gives you need info..
Regards
Rajesh

Multiple EDI files at receiver side

Hi,
We have an outbound interface(flat file --> PI --> EDI) where flat file coming in and PI processing it to customers.
Based on a field from input file, i am creating 3 UNH segments in one EDI file. But, we need to create 3 EDI files for each UNH segment.
For eg:
Number(from input file): 001,002,003, for each number I am creating 3 UNHs in one EDI file.
But I need 1 EDI for 001,1 EDI for 002,1 EDI for 003.
Is it possible to create multiple EDI at receiver side.
Please suggest me the possible ways to achieve this requirement.
Regards,
KNR.

Hi Its possible,
-->Number(from input file): 001,002,003, for each number I am creating 3 UNHs in one EDI file.
But I need 1 EDI for 001,1 EDI for 002,1 EDI for 003.
do You have any EDI XML structure in mapping?
In Message mapping signature tab change your mapping occurence 0..unbounded
and in mapping click target structure and click on duplicate subtree .(create 3 times)
and map your structure to 3 different structure of the same target message based on 3 UNHs
it will be basically 1:N mapping without BPM

Multiple System identifiers for one EDI Party

Hi,
I'm getting a problem when trying to send an IDoc to another R/3 system. I did the first tests with our SandBox and everything was working perfectly. Now, I'm trying to do the same tests against our QAT server.
So first, I have created all the new entries under the party identifiers. Then, new Business Service, receiver determination ... and finally the sender agreement.
So, now the file is getting picked up but I get this error:
<SAP:Code area="IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_INV_SND_PARTY</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>http://sap.com/xi/XI</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>XIParty</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3>Tech_Data</SAP:P3>
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Unable to convert sender XI party http://sap.com/xi/XI/XIParty/Tech_Data to an IDoc partner</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Seems the new identifiers for QAT is not piked up?!? Do I need to do something else if I have multiple identifiers?
Rgds,
Yves

Hi Yves,
In the "Indentifier" section of your party definition for the EDI Party
Change the following:
AGENCY = Change the Business System from SBX to QAT
Scheme = Remains the same
Name   = Change the SBX Partner Number to QAT
         Partner Number(same as QAT Partner Number
         in R/3 Partner Profile)
Idoc Receiver CC for QAT
1) In the "parameters" tab, check the option "Apply Control Record Values from Payload"
2) In the "Identifiers" tab,
   Enter the BS for QAT in "Sender Agency"
   Enter the Scheme for QAT "ALE#<partner role>#<partner function>"(same as in
   the identifiers tab of the EDI party definition)
   Enter the BS for QAT in "Receiver Agency"
   Enter the Schem for QAt as "ALE#LS"
It should work with these changes.
Rgds,
Sam Raju

Multiple users identified when only one on the machine - me

I am experiencing very slow internet communication and when trying to download latest App from Apple the guidance tells me that I need to shut down 'multiple users' when I am the only user shown on our machine. We did suffer a power cut a few days ago when the computer was being used. Would this 'upset' the system into thinking that it is still in use by the 'other user(s)' - is it possible to 'reset' to in effect clear this - I am using TimeMachine.
Normally I get good but not brilliant internet response but since the power cut we do seem to be running very slow - well that's out anaylis so far but any other suggestions as to how to get back to normal would be welcome.
I have run MacKeeper to see if it can find anything untoward.
Rodney

Hi Rodney
Let me address your issues in reverse order.
First, Mackeeper is extremely bad software, and is very often the cause of slow Macs. My recommendation is that you uninstall it immediately, and see if that improves your speed.
http://help.mackeeper.zeobit.com/Manual/GettingStarted/UninstallingMacKeeper.htm l
Next, can you describe what "app" you are downloading from Apple? Is it a software update?
How much hard drive space do you have available? Click cmd-i on your Macintosh HD shortcut and look at the "available" value.
It would be helpful if you could include your version of OS X in your profile. You say "iOS 7" which is iPhone/iPad software, not Mac software.
Matt

Same idoc to multiple EDI receiver system using rule

Dear Friends!
Good day! I am using desadv.delvry03 idoc and I want to send same idoc from same communication component to multiple receiver parties without mapping.
I have created first scenario successfully using idoc, when I create another scenario it gives me message like "Object already exist" . for that I have to use Service interface. I dont want to use service interface for this purpose. In my scenarios mapping is not even required. one idoc to and multiple receivers thats it.
Can you please guide me how to do the above requirement ?
your any help will be appreciated greatly
Thanking you
Regards
Dipen

Hi,
For this... U can create 1 sender agreent for that idoc if necesseary....otherwise we dont required IDOC sender Agreement.
Then Create 1 reciver determination in that u can mention the 2 recivers details...
same thing for interface determination also.
and finally create 2 reciver agreement and 2 reciver communication channels for 2 systems.
Let me know if you require any further information.
Thanks,
Sreenivas

Multiple EDI sales Orders to ORDERS05

Hi All,
My requirement is we are receiving 10 different EDIfiles and the message types are like(DLCHDR,ORDHDR,DLCHDR) which to be posted to ERP as sales orders. My query is we are receiving ORDHDR mesage types from 4 or 5 different customers.we are using see burger and planning to start with AS2 Sender adapter and IDOC receiver adapter.
Would it be necessary to built new interface for every message type and customer or any other easiest way of doing this?
Please respond ASAP
Cheers,
Smith

Hi Chirag,
Thanks for responding.
The document with steps which needs to be followed in BIC in order to convert the structure into the XSD structure so that you can use the structure in external definition of XI.
my email id is: [email protected]
My scenario is:
We are getting 10 different types of EDI files from 10 different customers to couple of mail boxes and we need to post them into ERP as sales orders. But, some customers 4 out of 10 are sending the data in the same message type format called ORDHDR.
We are planning to build 10 outbound interfaces and one inbound interface in XI to post these files as sales orders in ERP.
We are planning to use Seeburger, AS2 as sender adapter , Idoc as receiver and planning to install BIC tool as well.
Also we are planning to map all these EDI data to ORDERS05 (please correct me if Im wrong), so that the data can be posted into ERP as sales orders.
Could you please clarify?
Would one inbound interface serve my purpose?
Do we need to create different AS2 sender adapters for different mail boxes?
Any step by step explanation would really help me a lot
Thanks in advance Chirag
Cheers,
Smith

Multiple syntax identifiers

I am trying to configure my B2B server to allow two different syntax identifiers for the same Document Protocol Revision, UNOB and UNOC, but it doesn't seem to work. I have tried all sorts of combinations, leaving the default empty and just pointing out the Interchange ecs File, a combination of both (which works fine for either one of them, but not for both), setting the default value to '*' etc, but nothing works. Any idea how this can be achieved?

I am trying to send EDIFACT messages PRODAT D97A to the B2B server. My problem is that the messages can either have syntax version UNOB or UNOC and I am not able to get the configuration to work for both versions.

Multiple EDI Connections from ECC

Hello All,
Could you please let me know is it possible to create 2 ALE connections in 1 system and then choose as per partner profile which connection to be assigned?
Regards,
Anand

I hope i understand your question correct:
I this is outbound:;
you can create 2 rfc destinions, create the port manual for this RFC , in the partner profiles you can specify which message should go where;
in the distribution model ( BD64) you can specify filters what should go where.
If this is inbound
just create the partner profiles
Let me know if this is usefull or ifI misundestood the question.

EDI over FTP

Hi Ramesh,
We are facing some initial hiccups on b2b, it would be helpful if you can clear it.
The scenario: We get multiple EDI docs from multiple partners through FTP, but the rule is to process only those files which have an associated ".done" file. For ex. we process 850_EDI_X12.dat (this is the main doc with the data ) only if 850_EDI_X12.dat.done (this one is just a dummy file "0 kb", indicates the completion of the PO) has also got generated and then we need to delete both these files.
Please let me know how can I do the above on B2B.
Apart from the above couple of quick questions:
1. Can B2B itself poll and retrieve the file for processing or does it require BPEL for picking up the file and putting it on the queue ?
2. Can B2B itself put the EDI file content on the jms queue for a BPEL process to pick it up? (internal channel for inbound prcoessing)
Please let me know the answers to the above asap
thanks & regards,
Shailesh
null

Hello Ramesh,
Excuse me for re-starting an old thread, but an important concern has re-surfaced.
So far, in my testing I used to normally name the EDI files - in this manner - <TPName>_<doctype>_<doc revision>.dat, and B2B was successfully able to read it. The other day, I happened to put a file, with name as po.dat and the B2B threw an error stating unable to find trading partner agreement. Then, I again renamed the same file with the earlier naming standard, and it worked fine. I did few more rounds of testing with different combinations, but b2B failed to identify the trading partner. This indicates that B2B identifies the document based on File Names, rather than the interchange id, that we are providing.
In production, however, since we are the ones fetching the files from remote systems, we have little, in fact no control on the filename given by the trading partner.
Is there any parameter that I need to set for B2B to pick-up files not based on file name, but any file in that particular directory. I thought it was the envelope segment (ISA / GS) identifiers that B2B uses for identifying trading partners, but it doesn't seem so.
thanks for your help,
Shailesh

B2B Add on - Accepted /Partially Accepted using EDI Seperator.

I want to configure this feature of Accepted /Partially Accepted using EDI Seperator.
We were using seeburger Adapter and could configure this.
The scenario is :
When multiple EDI files is being processed in an inbound scenario using EDI separator Channel. , If any files fails due to Data /syntax error,
How to identify which file is been failed and how to send error ackn back to sender mentioning the files failed. .
Please can anyone help me on this.

Hi,
If I'm not mistaken, this feature is available as of SP3.
Ruchir Sinha, please correct me if I'm wrong.
Kind regards,
Dimitri

An appID with identifier. 'com.domainname.ourAppName' is not available

My app had a provisional profile under another developer using the app's CFBundleIdentifier. The original provisional profile is not available to our new development team.
When I attempted to create an AppID with same bundle identifier, got the error..."An AppID with identifier 'com.domainame.ourOriginalAppName' is not available. Please enter a different string..."
I'm looking for a way to solve this without generating multiple bundle identifiers for the same app which will be upgraded to current iOS version and maintained in App store as ongoing.
I have read forum responses that suggest using the wildcard character as com.domainName.* I'm not sure if this would be an appropriate choice for our app
Thanks in advance for taking the time to review and respond to this question.

If you are using the identifier like "com.domainName.*", then it will run all the apps in debug mode which matches with com.domainName. But you can deploy the app with this profile in appstore. You can use it for development.

Host with multiple AS2 Indentifiers

Hello all,
Is it possible in Oracle B2B to have multiple AS2 identifiers for the host trading partner? We have a customer that has multiple divisions; each division has their own AS2 Identifier/DUNS/etc. We would like to do this without setting up multiple instances of the B2B server - is this possible?
John

Hi Ramesh,
I'm in the same boat as John. To be precise, IHAC who wants to host both of their enterprises on the same instance of Oracle Integration. This way, they not only reduce total cost of deployment but also allow for sharing of document types across the two enterprises.
Questions:
1) Does your approach imply that document types cannot be shared across the dual hosts? Does it only work for outbound transactions? What if the dual hosts can act as both initiator and responder of the transaction?
2) To support exchange type of models, some competing vendors allow you to create multiple logical trading partner hosts in a single b2b deployment (I know for a fact that webMethods Trading Networks does). Can we simulate that behavior by creating two "Trading Partner Identifications" for the host TP (It looks like the TP create page does let you do that.) If so, can I create two TP IDs of the same type for the same TP?
In general, if you could shed more light on your previous note, especially with a tech note or something, that'd be great.
Regards,
Karthick

EDI sales order line items that can not fulfilled and completed.

Dear all,
My requirement
I have multiple EDI customers that send in orders daily where their requirements is that if the ordering item qty can not to fulfilled on the day then the line item in question on the corresponding created sale order needs to be automatically rejected along with a suitable and descriptive reason code.
I'm looking to have this a seamless as possible and don't want to have the user manually review stock, edit sales orders or ATP check as they do now
I've looked at the partial delivery settings on the customer master and customer item but I think this just warns that the customer requires complete deliveries.
I apologise now as SD is not my thing, but if anyone has seen this situation before or has a standard solution I'd be grateful?
Rgds

Hi Braven,
Ram has given good suggestion. I would like to add on it.
If the quantity is not availabe put a reason for rejection , this is fine. But we dont need to create a new line item.. right.
Because this way it will pile up line items in sales order..
Instead put the logic in such a way that, when qty is not available put a rejection.
If qty is partially availabe, then process the qty and create a new line item for the remianing qty. ( this is ofcourse if the customer agress on partial deliveries ).
The above is on assumptions that your users review orders which are on rejection and process further.And other assumption is your customer agrees on partial deliveries.
This is how we mapped in our system.Hope it helps.
Regards,
SB.

Multiple ISAs

Hi all,
It's been a while since last time I attempted to integrate EDI in BizTalk. I have been very busy with other projects, but I really need to understand how BizTalk processes EDI from multiple EDI partners within the same file. With that said, I'm including
some data I used to process coming from our VAN.
Could somebody please help me understand how I would be able to process the attached file? below is the data. I used to process this file using an EDI translator, a mapping software, and some VB6 and Fox Pro programs.
Thanks in advanced.
ISA*00* *00* *01*SENDER1111 *12*RECEIVER123 *070710*1325*U*00201*000006742*0*P*}
GS*PO*SENDER1111*RECEIVER123*20070710*1325*6750*X*004010
ST*850*67500001
BEG*00*SA*41090_133**20070710
DTM*037*20070717
N1*BT*0010-Plymouth
N3*6105 Trenton Ln N
N4*Plymouth*MN*55442
PER*BD**TE*763-551-7000
PO1*1*2*EA*57.95********IN*420961
PID*F**ZZ*PD*MATTRESSPAD,LYOCELLDOWN,QUEEN
SDQ*EA*92*1461*2*******************1
PO1*2*2*EA*69.95********IN*420963
PID*F**ZZ*PD*MATTRESSPAD,LYOCELLDOWN,EK
SDQ*EA*92*1461*2*******************2
PO1*3*4*EA*18.95********IN*421160
PID*F**ZZ*PD*PILLOW,RESTANDREAD,KHAKI,COVER
SDQ*EA*92*1514*4*******************3
PO1*4*4*EA*12.25********IN*421198
PID*F**ZZ*PD*PILLOW,DUALLOFT,SIDE,STD
SDQ*EA*92*1508*4*******************4
SDQ*EA*92*1025*4*******************5
SDQ*EA*92*1382*4*******************6
PO1*5*4*EA*12.85********IN*421199
PID*F**ZZ*PD*PILLOW,DUALLOFT,BACK,STD
SDQ*EA*92*1025*4*******************7
CTT*5
SE*26*67500001
GE*1*6750
IEA*1*000006742
ISA*00* *00* *01*SENDER1111 *12*RECEIVER123 *070710*1745*U*00201*000006747*0*P*}
GS*FA*SENDER1111*RECEIVER123*20070710*1745*6755*X*004010
ST*997*67550001
AK1*SH*3256
AK2*856*032560001
AK5*A
AK2*856*032560002
AK5*A
AK2*856*032560003
AK5*A
AK2*856*032560004
AK5*A
AK2*856*032560005
AK5*A
AK2*856*032560006
AK5*A
AK2*856*032560007
AK5*A
AK9*A*7*7*7
SE*18*67550001
ST*997*67550002
AK1*IN*3257
AK2*810*032570001
AK5*A
AK2*810*032570002
AK5*A
AK2*810*032570003
AK5*A
AK2*810*032570004
AK5*A
AK2*810*032570005
AK5*A
AK2*810*032570006
AK5*A
AK2*810*032570007
AK5*A
AK9*A*7*7*7
SE*18*67550002
GE*2*6755
IEA*1*000006747
ISA00 00 12SENDER2222 12RECEIVER123 0707101849U004010068776200P>
GSFASENDER2222RECEIVER1232007071018493068776201X004010
ST9970001
AK1SH994
AK2856009940001
AK5A
AK2856009940002
AK5A
AK2856009940003
AK5A
AK2856009940004
AK5A
AK2856009940005
AK5A
AK2856009940006
AK5A
AK2856009940007
AK5A
AK2856009940008
AK5A
AK2856009940009
AK5A
AK2856009940010
AK5A
AK2856009940011
AK5A
AK9A111111
SE260001
GE168776201
IEA1006877620
ISA00 00 12SENDER2222 12RECEIVER123 0707101937U004010000021040P>
GSPOSENDER2222RECEIVER12320070710193737972106X004010
ST8500001
BEG00SA0084700796458720070710
REFX91817304588
REFIA6692600
REFCO020433105
DTM01020070710
TD5UG
N1BTTest9392,539,352
N329560 LILAC RD
N4VALLEY CENTERCA920824011US
[email protected]
N1STTest9392,539,352
N329560 LILAC RD
N4VALLEY CENTERCA920824011
[email protected]
PO1011EA69TESK170511VN170511
PIDF08ABBOUD DOWN ALT QN COMF
PO47LB
DTM01020070710
TD5UG
PO1021EA20.45TESK170883VN170883
PIDF08ABBOUD DOWN ALT STD PILLW
PO44LB
DTM01020070710
TD5UG
CTT2
SE270001
GE12106
IEA1000002104
ISA*00* *00* *08*SENDER3333 *12*RECEIVER123 *070710*2012*U*00401*000002528*0*P*>
GS*PO*SENDER3333*RECEIVER123*20070710*2012*2528*X*004010VICS
ST*850*2842
BEG*00*RE*1783437**20070710
REF*BT*8768600241
REF*DP*0613HOME TEXTILES
FOB*DF
ITD*05*2*****30
DTM*001*20070720
DTM*010*20070716
DTM*015*20070716
PO1*1*140*EA*74.5*WE*UP*732165407621*CG*41
CTP**RES*250
SDQ*EA*92*0001*8*0002*6*0003*4*0004*2*0005*6*0006*6*0007*6*0009*4*0010*6*0011*6
SDQ*EA*92*0012*6*0013*6*0014*6*0016*6*0017*4*0020*2*0021*4*0022*4*0025*4*0026*4
SDQ*EA*92*0027*4*0028*6*0029*4*0030*6*0031*4*0033*4*0037*2*0055*2*0056*2*0061*4
SDQ*EA*92*0062*2
PO1*2*126*EA*89.5*WE*UP*732165407638*CG*41
CTP**RES*315
SDQ*EA*92*0001*8*0002*6*0003*4*0004*4*0005*4*0006*4*0007*4*0009*4*0010*6*0011*6
SDQ*EA*92*0012*6*0013*6*0014*6*0016*6*0017*2*0020*4*0021*4*0022*2*0025*2*0026*2
SDQ*EA*92*0027*4*0028*6*0029*4*0030*6*0031*2*0033*4*0037*2*0055*2*0056*2*0061*2
SDQ*EA*92*0062*2
CTT*2
SE*23*2842
GE*1*2528
IEA*1*000002528
ISA00 00 12SENDER2222 12RECEIVER123 0707102235U004010000021050P>
GSPOSENDER2222RECEIVER12320070710223539802107X004010
ST8500001
BEG00SA0084700796543420070710
REFX91817604040
REFIA6692600
REFCO020436733
DTM01020070710
TD5UG
N1BTtest9318,257,147
N335 IMPERIAL DR
N4SOUTH BURLINGTONVT054037826US
[email protected]
N1STtest9318,257,147
N335 IMPERIAL DR
N4SOUTH BURLINGTONVT054037826
[email protected]
PO1011EA54TESK170512VN170512
PIDF08ABBOUD DOWN ALT TW COMF
PO46LB
DTM01020070710
TD5UG
CTT1
SE220001
GE12107
IEA1000002105
ISA*00* *00* *01*SENDER1111 *12*RECEIVER123 *070710*2125*U*00201*000006751*0*P*}
GS*PO*SENDER1111*RECEIVER123*20070710*2125*6759*X*004010
ST*850*67590001
BEG*00*SA*40361_435**20070710
DTM*037*20070717
N1*BT*0010-Plymouth
N3*6105 Trenton Ln N
N4*Plymouth*MN*55442
PER*BD**TE*763-551-7000
PO1*1*2*EA*68.45********IN*420962
PID*F**ZZ*PD*MATTRESSPAD,LYOCELLDOWN,CK
SDQ*EA*92*1579*2*******************1
CTT*1
SE*12*67590001
ST*850*67590002
BEG*00*SA*41090_143**20070710
DTM*037*20070717
N1*BT*0010-Plymouth
N3*6105 Trenton Ln N
N4*Plymouth*MN*55442
PER*BD**TE*763-551-7000
PO1*1*4*EA*40.95**UP*732165075585*****IN*420737
PID*F**ZZ*PD*PILLOW,BACK SLEEPER,EUROLOFT,STD
SDQ*EA*92*1579*4*******************1
PO1*2*4*EA*26.95********IN*420852
PID*F**ZZ*PD*PILLOW,BACK SLPR,NATURE PREFERENCE,STD
SDQ*EA*92*1448*4*******************2
SDQ*EA*92*1579*4*******************3
PO1*3*4*EA*33.95********IN*420854
PID*F**ZZ*PD*PILLOW,SIDE SLPR,NATURE PREFERENCE,KING
SDQ*EA*92*1579*4*******************4
PO1*4*2*EA*57.95********IN*420961
PID*F**ZZ*PD*MATTRESSPAD,LYOCELLDOWN,QUEEN
SDQ*EA*92*1579*2*******************5
PO1*5*2*EA*69.95********IN*420963
PID*F**ZZ*PD*MATTRESSPAD,LYOCELLDOWN,EK
SDQ*EA*92*1579*2*******************6
PO1*6*4*EA*18.95********IN*421160
PID*F**ZZ*PD*PILLOW,RESTANDREAD,KHAKI,COVER
SDQ*EA*92*1448*4*******************7
SDQ*EA*92*1579*4*******************8
PO1*7*4*EA*12.25********IN*421198
PID*F**ZZ*PD*PILLOW,DUALLOFT,SIDE,STD
SDQ*EA*92*1579*4*******************9
PO1*8*4*EA*12.85********IN*421199
PID*F**ZZ*PD*PILLOW,DUALLOFT,BACK,STD
SDQ*EA*92*1448*4*******************10
SDQ*EA*92*1579*4*******************11
CTT*8
SE*36*67590002
GE*2*6759
IEA*1*000006751
ISA00 00 08SENDER4444 12RECEIVER123 0707110435U004010010001800P?
GSPOSENDER4444RECEIVER1232007071104351000180X004010
ST8500001
BEG00RE25919220070711
REFDP696
REFIA000076489
REFPD07
SACNVIOHPR
DTM01020070717
N1BY921918
N1ST9287449
N1Z7921918
PO116EA39.5IN10541UP732165176862
PO130EA49.5IN10542UP732165176879
CTT2
SE140001
GE11000180
IEA1001000180

This will be a new BizTalk integration. There is nothing in place. I'm starting from zero.
When I say how would I process it, I mean the following..
I believe I had already explained on this forum how I used to do EDI with another EDI translator, but if you ask me.... how would you process it the way you used to do EDI, this is how I used to do it.
1. Data is received within the same file and sorted out by the EDI translator to the proper trading partner.
2. Once sorted, within the individual Trading Partner entities, a 997 (good or reject) is generated and placed in the Outgoing documents.
3. Next, the individual EDI 850 maps read the data and populate it into a temporary DB table.
4. A program (C#, VB.NET, etc.) kicks in, which further analyzes the data(price, quantities, customer on hold, etc.) against customer info in the production DB to flag it as good or invalid. This step is performed so that an E-mail is
sent back to the Trading Partner informing of invalid data, if found.
5. Next the good data is imported into the production DB.
6. After the data is processed, the 997s are sent.
I'm oversimplifying the entire process, but those are some of the steps.
My point is... if somebody asks me how I did it from start to end, I can definitely explain every step from receiving 850s to sending 856s, 810s, etc.
I have watched BizTalk Training videos and read some articles and books on this topic, but I have not been able to find one that explains how to deal with more than one trading partner, receiving and sending back.
Hope the experts here can help me with this.
Thanks in advance.

Multiple EDI Identifiers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for