Multiple Instance of XI in one BOX ?

Hi All,
Is it possible to install two instances of XI (say DEV and QA environment) in one box.I understand for the abap stack we can use different system numbers for different environment.For the java stack,the port would then include the system number thus allowing multiple instances.
Has anyone tried this ,does it work?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Bikram

Hello,
I am not sure it could works because you can only connect one J2EE stack to one ABAP client.
In your case you need 1 J2EE Engine for each client -> So 2 J2EE Engine.
I am not sure you can install 2 JAVA Addin for one ABAP Stack !!??
Good luck
If you try it could post the result ?
Best regards,
Chris

Similar Messages

Can one installation of SSIS be shared by multiple instances on the same physical box?

Hello everyone,
I hope I'm posting this question on the correct forum.
We are short on money this year and we decided to purchase one physical system to represent Development and QA.
I am designing an architecture around my systems where I would have a two SQL Server Instances (2014, Enterprise Ed), one for each environment:
DVSV-ODS01\DEV
DVSV-ODS01\QA
The only possible problem is SSIS, which I cannot have multiple installations of SSIS on the same box.
Is it possible to have the SSIS service serving the two SQL Server instances installed on the same physical box?
Thanks for your help.

Not on the same physical box, but you can go with running say the QA environment on a Virtual Machine.
E.g. the very free VirtualBox should do it. And then you can install two SSIS instances.
You can even access them simultaneously this way.
Arthur
MyBlog
Twitter

Can I set up multiple instances on iPlanet on one server, one to handle clear-text traffic, and one to handle SSL traffic?

Long story, but the iPlanet version is 4.1 SP9. We will be filtering users coming in remotely (via internet VPN or dialup) to the SSL implementation, the internal intranet users to the clear-text implementation... thanks!

Hi,
you can run more then one instance in iWS.
like one for http://www.test.com:80(for TEXT) and other for https://www.test.com:6000
(Note: you couldn't not able to use same port for different instance). I hope this may answer your question.
Thanks,
Daks.

Multiple instances of APEX on Single Box

Hi Everyone,
We are currently working on Oracle 1g APEX and looking for multiple APEX instances to be running on a single oracle server. Can it be possible? If it Is possible, then does it require any additional software installation or some kind of configuratin will be enough.
If anybody knows, please help.
regards,
Anuradha

You can have only one version of APEX per Oracle Instances.
What we do is have one database instance per APEX versions and only one HTTP server config.
Ex: SID : AX31 = APEX 3.1 and SID : AX32 = APEX 3.2
In the Dads.conf file , we setup a DAD for each like : /pls/AX31 and /pls/AX32
HTH
Francis.

Multiple Instances and schemas to One

Hi,
Good Morning to all gurus.
Using Oracle Version 11.2.0.2
We have a database With 4 instances and Each Instance will be having 10 to 15 schemas Based on Countries. Here in all schemas we will be having Huge data's (count may be 3 to 5 crores for some 10 tables)
Now am keen to Know If i change the above to a single instance and Single Schema(Common for all countries) What Pros and cons Will be there (Technical).
Any Links or Answers are highly appreciated.
HOPE GURUS Here can help me study and understand the above scenarios.
Regards,
Simma....

http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:2246908001297
cons:
o harder to manage
o harder to upgrade
o harder to patch
o harder to maintain
o causes your shared pool size to increase 1,000 times (shared sql goes down the tubes)
o takes more space
o queries against the dictionary will be impacted
o latching on the shared pool goes WAY up (latching = locks = serialization device =
slows you down)
pros:
o none that I can think of.
https://forums.oracle.com/thread/1032030
Seperate schemas have advantages with security, privacy, seperation of duties, and change control. Seperate schemas also have the advantage of logical granularity / grouping for easier management, upgrade, decommission, scalability, hardware or software migration.
Yes, you can develop applications faster if you don't have to think about security, scalability etc, but it will come back to haunt you later.
RobertGeier
AND
Separate schemas have the disadvantage of requiring additonal grants and privileges to support the reference of non-owned objects used in stored code and to support FK definitions across tables owned by different users.
Naming standards and system codes can be used to identify and segregate objects defined under one schema.
The use of solid naming standards with a well chosen group of owners (schemas) would likely be a good compromise. The choice really depends on how large the applicaiton is going to be object wise and how integrated the objects are going to be. The more integration the less separate owners is beneficial.
IMHO -- Mark D Powell --

Multiple instance of WLS in one and same fusion home.

Hi
Some SOA/weblogic server related questions
1. Is it possible to have different instances of Weblogic Server (different versions/patches) installed in one SOA environment, sharing same MW_HOME?
2. Will there be any problem when patching any of the Weblogic server instances?
Thanks
Regards
/Martin
Edited by: 890736 on 2011-okt-17 05:15

Hi Martin
1. NO, you cannot have different instances of WLS with same version of SOA and using same middleware home. The underlying Weblogic Server version is tightly coupled with the SOA Version deployed on top of it.
2. We cannot mismatch wls and soa versions, even though they may work. But it is not supported and not recommended. Infact corresponding IDE like JDev version should also match accordingly. And finally the RCU version should also match.
WLS 10.3.5 -> SOA 11.3.5
WLS 10.3.4 -> SOA 11.3.4
WLS 10.3.3 -> SOA 11.3.3
Thanks
Ravi Jegga

Multiple instances of CL_GUI_TIMER on one screen

Hello.
I need to display ALV_GRID which will self refresh.
I have a problem with CL_GUI_TIMER class. The smallest interval between its execution can be set to 1 second. For my purposes unfortunately i need interval less then that. Something around 0.3 s. I had an idea to use 3 different instances of CL_GUI_TIMER each started 0.3s after another. But somehow im recieving finished event only from the last of them.
Does anyone encounter similar situation. Or maybe there is another way to execute timer in 0.3s ?

Yes really, unfortunetaly it is not my decision and i don't have a chance to change it. Still my question is. Is it normal that you cant create two instances of Cl_gui_timer ? Maybe there is a chance to do it somehow
Best regards
Marcin
Edited by: Marcin Winkiel on Mar 24, 2009 9:55 AM

Issue with multiple instances of OC4J and one JDK installation

Hi,
I've successfully installed two instances of OC4J 10g (10.1.3.0.0) on a single server and am able to run with two differently named JDK 5.0 installs.
However, I've not been able to concurrently run both instances with a single JDK. The 2nd OC4J instance starts, but then stops immediately with a JVM termination.
Does anyone have an idea of the cause and a possible solution to the problem, as the current arrangement adds a level of complexity to upgrades that I'd like to remove?
Thanks,
Malcolm White

I run two OC4J 10.1.3.1 instances in parallel without any problem. Both instances use the same JDK and run without any problems. Seems you have some problems in you configuration.
Best,
Manfred

Multiple versions on one box

Hi
Could someone help me with the below questions.
We have multiple MaxDB databases running on one box for EC and BW. There is a requirement to upgrade the BW database software, to do this do I have to upgrade the other databases on the box? Though my OS is Linux, I would also like to know the possibilities in windows environement.
If we can have multiple versions of databases on one box, are there any known problems. If the database version are different, how does the common services or executables work (eg:- I understand that there is only on XSERVER per box) and which folders are updated (is it only "database_dependent_path" or "independent_program_path" as well)?
Please advise
Thanks

Hi,
1. "Do I have to upgrade the other databases on the box?" -- It depends on your software and instance setup. If the multiple instances are installed under different directories. For e.g., the two instances 773 and 763 are installed under different directories on my PC:
> dbmcli db_enum
773     C:\sapdb\773\db                         7.7.03.16       fast    running
763     C:\sapdb\763\db                         7.6.03.06       fast    offline
> dbmcli inst_enum
7.7.03.16    C:\sapdb\773\db
7.6.03.06    C:\sapdb\763\db
If the EC and BW instances are installed under different directories, you can upgrade them independently of each other. This behavior is similar on all OS.
2. There are no known problems running multiple versions of databases on one box. When you update one instance, the database_dependent_path is updated. If the independent_program_path contains programs of an older version or build, it is updated as well.
Hope this helps,
Ashwath

Multiple instances of weblogic pointing to same public_html

Hi,
I am using Weblogic 5.1 and have successfully set it up to start multiple instances
of weblogic from one weblogic server(each instance has its own unique port).
Currently I have multiple instances of public_html (one for each instance). Does
anyone know what I have to do to point all instances of weblogic to a common public_html?
Many thanks in advance
Dipen

create a symbolic link that is called public_html that points to the common
docroot.
"Dipen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3b7cf1bf$[email protected]..
>
Hi,
I am using Weblogic 5.1 and have successfully set it up to start multipleinstances
of weblogic from one weblogic server(each instance has its own uniqueport).
Currently I have multiple instances of public_html (one for eachinstance). Does
anyone know what I have to do to point all instances of weblogic to acommon public_html?
>
Many thanks in advance
Dipen

OBIEE 10g multiple instances of scheduler

Hello,
I have server with multiple instances of Oracle BI: one Oracle BI Server with two different RPDs and two Presentation services with different web catalogs. Customer wants to run Oracle Delivers on both instances of Oracle BI. I tried setup 2 instances of scheduler but faced with a problem that I can't pass to scheduler which config file (instanceconfig.xml) to use.
Can you help with solution how to run multiple schedulers with different configurations on one server?
Thanks in advance,
Vladimir

If I'm not wrong, this wont work. Scheduler instanceconfig.xml file will be override based on Scheduler settings using each RPD file.

Multiple Instances of WL on 1 m/c all proxied thru' respective IIS instances. is that possibe???

Hello,
we need to have multiple instances of WL on one m/c each refering to a
separate weblogic directory. further we use 1 instance of IIS webserver
Here what our set up is :
different ports of IIS mapped to different instances of weblogic ( each
instance has its own directory-- hence multiple directories too ).
hence
port 80 maps to dir c:\auction1\
port 8101 maps to dir c:\presales\
Has anybody tried this setup? does this work?
komal.
You should place the .ini file in the root directory of your WebLogic
installation, for example weblogic/iisproxy.ini.

They should work fine. However, you should note that you'll not be able to
cluster the WebLogic servers in this configuration.
Michael Girdley
WLS Product Manager
komal <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:8dnj8e$j93$[email protected]..
Hello,
we need to have multiple instances of WL on one m/c each refering to a
separate weblogic directory. further we use 1 instance of IIS webserver
Here what our set up is :
different ports of IIS mapped to different instances of weblogic ( each
instance has its own directory-- hence multiple directories too ).
hence
port 80 maps to dir c:\auction1\
port 8101 maps to dir c:\presales\
Has anybody tried this setup? does this work?
komal.
You should place the .ini file in the root directory of your WebLogic
installation, for example weblogic/iisproxy.ini.

Multiple instances of ECM 11g on one server

I've read a few posts about installing multiple instances of ECM 11g on one server, but I have a few questions. My current set up is
A single Windows 2008 Server R2 server
8 gb RAM
Weblogic 10.3.5
1 install of ECM 11g in the base_domain
Database is Oracle 11.2
I want to add another instance of ECM to this server, but when I went to run the RCU, I was not allowed to use the same prefix for my tablespaces. Is this expected? I'm fine with using a different prefix, I just was surprised to see that I couldn't use the same prefix on this install since I was using a completely different database.
Assuming I use a different prefix... do I just add a new domain for this additional ECM instance? Is there anything else I need to know?
Thank you

I went to run the RCU, I was not allowed to use the same prefix for my tablespaces. Is this expected?Yes. It will create tables with the same name visible for a different database user (thus, the prefix).
do I just add a new domain for this additional ECM instance? Is there anything else I need to know?Actually, I think you can even install more instances to the same domain (this is more a question to Weblogic Server admins - I think there's been some posts recently on this topic). What definitely must be unique, is the port number. If you are OK with using different port numbers for your instances, it should be relatively easy. If you need the same port (e.g. 80 because of proxy limits), there are some ways how to redirect - it that case, two domains might be required.

Can I create multiple instances of realplayer plug-in in one jsp page?

I want to play meny video files in one jsp web page, these video files are to be played with the embeded plug-in of realplayer, each plug-in was linked(use its SRC property) a different video file. But, to my surprise, when I press the play button, every player played the same video file,not its specified file.
I have no idea why it did so and what can I do?
Whether can I create multiple instances of realplayer plug-in in one jsp page, that is to say, each instance is independent of others?
thanks in advance!

Generally speaking, Internet Explorer tries not to launch multiple versions of a plug-in. So what's happening is that you load the first video clip, and then before it has a chance to play, you load the second video clip into the same window. (It's like changing songs in WMA.)
In some cases - this may not work for Real Player, but it's worth trying - if you spawn a new window through a hypertext link and then launch the plug-in in that window, IE will treat it separately. Otherwise, you could not, for example, run two Macromedia Flash applications from different web sites at the same time.
Keep in mind that only one program can access the soundcard at a time, so Real Player may purposely "pause" or "cancel" other video streams until the active one finishes. If you were using the desktop version, selecting another video by any means aborts the currently running video (i.e., RP won't let you create a separate instance of it).
The easiest solution is to create a wrapper JSP file that takes the name of the video clip, and plays it. Call that JSP and specify that it should be opened in a new window via the TARGET keyword in the anchor tag. Then hopefully RP itself won't block a second window from running.

Multiple instances of one app of the same name

Hello,
we have few FMS/AMS servers, versions 4, 4.5 and 5, running some kind of internet TV tubes on them.
Each tube is supposed to run as unique instance of a Tube app, with unique settings for publishing to CDN (Akamai).
Sometimes following scenario happens: We reload the stream via administration console or administration API with use of reloadApp command, instance starts closing sequence, even triggers onAppStop event. But as the new instance starts, the old process wakes up again and lives together with the new one - when I check then throught administration API with use of getActiveInstances command, it shows me more instance of the same name as result - for example:
-<data>
<_0>tv_app/tube25</_0>
<_1>tv_app/tube2</_1>
<_2>tv_app/tube21</_2>
<_3>tv_app/tube2</_3>
<_4>tv_app/tube2</_4>
</data>
From logs I can see that each of that instances runs under different process ID (x pid column).
This is quite unpreffered behaviour, as with the same connection settings the multiple instances steals the connection to CDN entry point from each other which causes problems and unpredictable behaviour...
I have following questions related to this:
1. - Why the onAppStop is triggered when using reloadApp and unloadApp commands or buttons in admin console, when documentation says that this event should not be triggered on these ocassions (see http://help.adobe.com/en_US/adobemediaserver/ssaslr/WS5b3ccc516d4fbf351e63e3d11a11afc95e-7 edfSSASLR.2.3.html#WS5b3ccc516d4fbf351e63e3d11a11afc95e-7fe2SSASLR.2.3)
2. - How is it possible that system runs more instances of the same app with the same name? How to avoid such behaviour?
I already noticed following aspects to have influence on the possibility to run multiple instance with the same name and got rid of them but problem still persists:
- case sensivity of app name (one client connects to TV_app/tube2 and other connects to tv_app/tube2)
- using false as return value in onAppStop event handler - when reloaded, new instance is started but the old one persists
I am very eager to hear some explanation or clarification of such logic as it comes to me as some kind of internal bug as I have found everywhere that the instances names should be always unique....
Thanks

I just want to note that my recommendations led my clients to purchase more than 5 licences of FMIS/AMIS througt the time.
As I see how low is the passion to react to any problem on Adobe side, I would have probably changed my mind.
This is really pain in the *** as any call to adobe official contact (taken on mind that to find one is a big quest by itself) lead just to reply "pay nasty amount for our consultancy Sir!" and it does not look any better here....
I am no novice on FMS/AMS platform, working with it more than 6 years throught many projects and I would not ask for some stupid questions which could be solved just by looking to documentation or could be solved by some performance eperience.
I am really upset for this :/

Multiple Instance of XI in one BOX ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for