Multiple instances of firefox running cannot kill in task manager "Access denied"

There's no issue with starting a new instance after closing one, the "firefox is already running" error is not occurring (ok maybe once or twice a month, but it's not related to this problem, as my problem happens all the time.)
Apparently when closing a ff window it never fully stops. My computer slows down because of it and these multiple instances of firefox show up in Task Manager. When I try to kill the extra processes it just goes "BANG" and the "access denied" error dialog box appears. They are all running under my user account, and in CPU some are just 10 or 25 and some are in the hundreds and some are over a million. what the heck is going on?
I'm running Windows 7 64 bit and ff 23.0 but this has been happening since about ff 15 (?)

When closing Firefox completely, it is important to close it using the <i>Exit</i> button, located inside of the Firefox/File menu.
Another cause to this problem could be a Firefox preloader. Do you have any programs that will load Firefox automatically? They are supposed to improve start time.
You can also '''try Firefox Safe Mode''' to see if the problem goes away. Safe Mode is a troubleshooting mode, which disables most add-ons.
''(If you're not using it, switch to the Default theme.)''
* Open the Help menu and click on the '''Restart with Add-ons Disabled...''' menu item while Firefox is running.
''Once you get the pop-up, just select "'Start in Safe Mode"''
'''''If the issue is not present in Firefox Safe Mode''''', your problem is probably caused by an extension, and you need to figure out which one. Please follow the [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] article for that.
''To exit the Firefox Safe Mode, just close Firefox and wait a few seconds before opening Firefox for normal use again.''
I hope that one of my solutions helps to fix your problem. Please report back with updates soon.
<b>NOTE: </b>You are using an outdated version of Firefox. This can cause security and functionality issue. Please update to the most recent version as soon as possible.

Similar Messages

  • Firefox already running, profile missing or inaccessible, cannot kill in task manager

    For reference, this is on windows 8
    In the past I've (very rarely) had the "firefox is already running" error and was able to fix it by ending the process in task manager. I updated to firefox 36 the other day. Since then, firefox will run perfectly normally for a while, but after some time (varies from minutes to hours) I can no longer load new pages. The loading wheel just keeps spinning.
    Once this has happened, if I quit firefox and try to open it again, it will give me "firefox already running" followed by "profile missing or inaccessible" error messages. If I go to task manager, sometimes no firefox.exe is there, sometimes it is and I cannot close it. In either case I still can't start the program.
    I tried reinstalling firefox, which did not fix the issue. I've also tried creating a new profile, again to no avail. AVG picks up no malware. I did a system restore to a week ago, which seemed to work for a while, but the problem has started again. I'm looking for a solution other than installing an old version, if possible.

    Do you have the Firefox icon on your quick launch? Right click
    on it, and select '''Open New Window.''' Sometimes this works.
    If it opens, close it by '''Menu > File > Exit.'''
    This is not a cure but will make it easier if Firefox locks up in Windows.
    '''https://support.mozilla.org/questions/997866''' {web link}
    Separate Issue;
    Your System Details shows;
    Installed Plug-ins
    Shockwave Flash 16.0 r0
    Shockwave Flash 11.8 r800
    Having more than one version of a program may cause issues.
    Grab the uninstaller from here:
    '''[http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/uninstall-flash-player-windows.html Uninstall Flash Player | Windows]'''
    '''[http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/uninstall-flash-player-mac-os.html Uninstall Flash Player | Mac]'''
    Then reinstall the latest version.
    Flash Player '''Version 16.0.0.305<br>https://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/distribution3.html'''
    Shockwave Director '''Version 12.1.7.157 http://get.adobe.com/shockwave/'''

  • Multiple instances of firefox in task manager but FF doesn't open

    - Windows XP SP3 (up to date with all critical updates)
    - FireFox 25.0.1 (Note: Originally I had version 31 but a few days ago that stopped working)
    - Norton Security Suite (the comcast version) up to date
    - I have IE6 and Chrome 37 as backup browsers (Note: when FF stopped working, IE8 had also stopped working - page would open, only one system process, but page would never load)
    Ran the following scans:
    - SUPERAntiSpyware Free Edition
    - Malwarebytes Anti-Malware
    - Ad-Aware Antivirus
    - Spybot-S&D Start Center
    Found a few non-critical yet potential infections (nothing too crazy)
    Symptom persists as follows:
    - fresh boot of computer
    - open task manager (no instances of FF)
    - open firefox - process appears in task manager and immediately goes to 50%
    (nothing opens and nothing listed in Applications)
    - open a second instance of firefox - 2nd process appears in task manager
    (still nothing opens and neither instance appears in Applications
    (the two instances continue to run at a cumulative 50% CPU usage - one might be 15% and the other running at 35% - or both running at 25% each)
    - open a third instance of firefox
    (still nothing opens, and all three instances show in task manager processes and cumulatively run at 50% - example:15 +15 + 20 or 10 + 15 + 25)
    Troubleshooting:
    restored a drive image from May 2014
    - Note: Dec 2013 I had done a complete FRESH new install of Windows XP in prep for EOL and installed all updates, including SP3, so the image I chose from May was only 5 months old, but I chose that one because of some of the other programs I had installed that month and didn't want to go through that again
    - Note #2: I have drive image run a monthly PQI backup of my C: drive and my R: drive) I have two hard drives 300G each whereas C: drive is OS only and R: drive is all my downloads, my documents, my photos, etc)
    - after the image restored, I tried to open FF and IE8, neither app was problematic. FF auto updated from what version, I don't know, but it was on 31 when I realized the problem was BACK. Also ran some WIN critical updates, and IE8 stopped working too!
    uninstalled IE8 (rolled back to IE6 and now IE works - but obviously I can not live with IE6 - I need to update that!) uninstalled FF31 (and deleted all temp and profile account folders) and installed a brand new copy of FF25 - whereas I immediately force stopped autoupdater and deleted the update files so I could remain on FF25.
    Now FF25 will open only on the second instance of the process (the first will always go to 50% CPU, the second will open and run between 0 and 10 CPU, and only one application in Applications)
    - I have learned that I can kill the 50% process using task manager or process explorer and total CPU usage will drop down to 0% - 10%
    I can open many many tabs without any problems, and I can right click a link to open a new window and all is good, BUT if I use the desktop ICON, the quick launch ICON or the START > Programs > Icon, then the NEXT process will go to 50% and no second window will open
    I have seen dozens of forums that have reported similar memory issues, but none have been resolved.
    Can you help me? I don't want to upgrade IE6 to IE8 just yet, but I will not use it for anything but testing until I can upgrade. Note: besides being painfully slow, I have been switching to Chrome, but I have never enjoyed Chrome.... I am using FF right now to ask for help.
    Any suggestions?

    I have the "techie" answer for all of you. According to the tier 2 support at Norton Help Desk, the latest live update from Norton "utilizes Visual Studio 2012 which enables SSE2 instructions" and my processor can not handle that.
    He said they are "working on a solution" and offered to reply back on Wednesday / Thursday this week if a solution could be found...

  • Multiple instances of ichat running at once

    Very short version of events:
    doing long distance tech help for elderly friend (which is agonizing beyond belief 'cause I can't screen share). On her machine ---
    iChat starts up fine, in fact it will start up more than once, she can have multiple instances of iChat running simultaneously.  That's the first issue.
    Once iChat is started up and you check the iChat menu, Preferences is greyed out. That's the second issue.
    Also under the iChat menu, Accounts shows... no account. That's the third issue.
    All three symptoms 'should' be impossible.
    I have deleted the various iChat pref files
    Restarted the computer
    Both to no avail
    Switching to the Guest account and starting iChat from there behaves normally, it does the 'welcome new user.... let's set up your account' type thing.

    Hi,
    I must admit I did think Parental Controls (Even if tested in a new Account which would have effected even an Admin Account) would have been a large part of this.
    ----- Would have made sense, but not the case. 
    Is she starting this from an iChat Icon that is in the DOCK already ?
    I have, through Skype screensharing, watched her start it up from iChat in the Applications folder. Each time she double clicks the app or does the File>Open thing another iteration of it appears in the Dock.
    If so then Drag this Off the DOCK and let go (Puff of Smoke Animation)
    Go to the Applications Folder and drag the app back to the DOCK.
    --- Yep, been there, done that too.
    This will Renew the link between the app and DOCK icon.
    Can she also do a Get Info on the app and say which version it is ?
    Either from the Finder's File menu or Highlight the app in the Applications folder then use the Apple/CMD ( or ⌘) + i keys together. (Example below)
    If she has a Leopard or Snow Leopard computer then she can also use Quick Look.
    (If she has OS 10.5.8 and iChat 4.0.8 it will show as iChat 4.0.9 here)
    Can you also tell me which version of the OS she is Running ?
    --- 10.6.7
    This is because iChat gets Updated with certain OS Updates
    and iChat is 5.0.3
    For Instance, Snow Leopard at 10.6.1 updates iChat 5 to iChat 5.0.1 and at OS 10.6.3 iChat gets updated to version 5.0.3 (where it has remained).  As  Leopard goes from 10.5 to 10.5.8 there are many more updates to iChat. iChat gets to version 4.0.8/4.0.9 (As in the last pic) depending on a security Update after 10.5.8 was released).
    If she does a Spotlight Search does she see more than one version of iChat ?
    --- Nope. And I've done an 'enhanced' Spotlight search including 'everywhere' (ie System, Libraries and, jut for kicks, invisible folders), in the event that God forbid somehow or other she hid another copy somewhere else unintentionally. I can say with certainty that there is ONLY one copy of iChat on the machine.
    Mine does as I have Cloned the Drive
    At this point I am also wondering if her account on the Mac has been introduced from somewhere else (another Mac) as part of an Update/Upgrade process.
    ---- Nope. It was created 'from scratch' when she bought the machine and has been performing flawlessly for about 10 months.
    If so is there a "Previous System" Folder on her Hard Drive at the top Level (Click the Hard Drive icon itself).
    If there is an Applications folder in here (if it exists) it may contain a version of iChat that is linked to the DOCK icon and be the one that tries to launch first . The earlier thing of dragging the icon off the DOCK and dragging it back again will sort that.
    If she is sure she has everything she wants from the "Previous System" then she can delete it.
    --- Not relevant, never done a reinstall
    I can sort of recreate this state.
    If I launch iChat normally then use Terminal to start iChat a second in the DOCK is created.
    This one if the Front app does not have access to the Preferences and the Accounts sub menu item is also Empty
    See My Force Quit window
    ---- Yep, that's what hers looks like. 
    However it seems to differ in that the Buddy Lists are not duplicated (That may be due to a Add-On Called Chax that I use and I get shown the All Contacts Buddy List) The all Contact list does not have my Buddy Pic and never fills in with any Buddies.
    ---- No 'add ons' of any kind on her machine. 'Factory stock' (make for easier trouble shooting     )
    If I revert to the regular iCon I have Preferences and it shows Accounts in the Sub menu item.
    Do her icons vary in what they show ?
    --- Nope
    Does she use the Icon in the DOCK to launch iChat or is it some other form of Link such as a AppleScript they may use Terminal to do it for her ?
    ---- She has in the past used the Dock icon. Still uses it, but with the weird result. 
    I am trying to get an understanding on this for several reasons.
    1) I would like to know what is creating it before suggesting a Reinstall of iChat
    ---- An interesting idea. So, being a pretty adept Mac guy, and not adverse to trying 'outside the box' solutions, here's what we did....
    I have the same OS version and same iChat version on my machine.
    Got her to compress the existing copy of iChat in her Applications folder
    'Sent' her a copy of my iChat through my MobileMe iDisk
    Guided her through dragging and dropping it into the Applications folder (remember I said 'outside the box'?)
    Had her do File>Open on that copy of iChat....
    Same results - No preferences, no accounts of any kind.
    To me this says that it is not the application itself but something else. What exactly that something else is, remains a mystery. Further corroborating that the app itself is 'good' is that as you may recall she WAS able to get it to start up in her Guest account and it behaved normally, asking for her account info etc.
    2) I am curious
    3) I would prefer to use less "destructive" methods before resorting to Reinstalling the app.
    --- She's emailed back after having spoken to Apple support.  Machine is still under warranty so she is taking it to an Apple Store on Monday. From the way she describes the support phone call it sounds like she might have gotten elevated a couple of levels during the call.
    I sense a 'system reinstall' in the very near future. 

  • When I close firefox I find another instance of firefox running that points to an advertisement

    When I close a session of Firefox I find another instance of firefox running (which I haven't initiated) this usually contains an advert.
    I've checked that popups have been disabled, which it has been. I tried disabling add-ons but this had no effect.
    Any suggestions would be appreciated.

    http://kb.mozillazine.org/Popups_not_blocked

  • When I close Firefox, then later want to start up again, I get I message that Firefox is still running. With "START TASK MANAGER", I need to close Firefox in order to start again.

    When I close Firefox, then later want to start up again, I get I message that Firefox is still running. With "START TASK MANAGER", I need to close Firefox in order to start again.

    I have the same problem. Firefox won't unload regardless of how long I wait. Literally hours ... I must go in and 'end the process'. This has been a real hassle for a while now. Even considered giving up on firefox. Please look into this! An additional problem; I have to run firefox to get the updates, but I can't get the updates to take because I can't get firefox to unload so I can restart it.

  • Firefox won't open until Task Manager is opened, why?

    Recently I have noticed a slight problem with my Firefox browser. Upon closing when I attempt to re open (shortcut: ctrl + alt + f), it just sits there. It doesn't even appear to be registering that its trying to open. If I try to open again it does nothing & will only fully open & show the running Firefox windows when I open Task Manager. It doesn't happen all the time although its been an off & on occurrence over the past few days now. Is this happening because of the shortcut key? Or is there another problem why it wont start until Task Manager is opened?

    Firefox Hang at Exit
    * https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Firefox%20hangs#w_hang-at-exit
    Firefox is already running but is not responding
    * https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Firefox%20is%20already%20running%20but%20is%20not%20responding
    Check and tell if its working.

  • Firefox opens according to my task manager, but will not appear on my desktop.

    My windows XP computer refuses to show Firefox on my desktop. Task Manager shows firefox.exe active and using about 43 meg of memory. I have tried Firefox 4 and Firefox 3.6.
    Using XP sp3 on this computer. Have scanned using Avast AV and Malwarebytes. I have 4 gig of memory on this computer.
    I do not receive any error messages.

    Could be a problem with your Firewall. Eliminate all references to Firefox and Plug-in container. The Firewall should ask for permission and re-set if Firefox starts. Try disabling Firewall and Anti-virus briefly.
    Try starting in Safe Mode - Hold Shift key down as you double click on your Firefox desktop icon> don't check anything on the page that opens>Continue. Actually this is probably the best place to start.
    If Fx works in Safe Mode you probably have a problem with one of your extensions or a conflict. Remember that all sorts of things have been up-dated as well as Firefox.
    Along the way make sure your Plug-ins(like Flash) are up-to-date.
    Be suspicious of third-party toolbars and try disabling them.
    This won't be the specific problem but if you get Firefox going you should try disabling Hardware Acceleration to see if it runs better - Options>Advanced>General>browsing>uncheck "Use Hardware Acceleration . . . If it does run better you should update your graphics card.
    This is the standard troubleshooting you may have to work through -
    https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Troubleshooting%20extensions%20and%20themes
    Another suggestion you may get, certainly when all else fails, is to download a new full Firefox installer to your desktop. Uninstall your old Firefox, don't delete your preferences etc; and then install your new Firefox.

  • FireFox starts, process shows in task manager, GUI doesn't appear.

    Well I just installed windows 7 pro 64 bit. Installed firefox 3.6.13. Worked fine (Using my 8years old profile). Then in mean time SP1 finished installing. After reboot firefox doesn't work. Nor the profile manager (firefox -p) nor the safe mode (firefox -s) nor normal mode. All those make firefox process show up in task manager, but no GUI. Same goes for firefox 4 beta. All versions of 3.6.4 up (so all versions with plugin container) and 4 beta I can find and download behave the same. Even some 3.7 alpha 5 thingy. Only version that works without troubles is 3.5.x and 3.6 up to 3.6.3 I'm on atm. I totally don't get it why its happening. Same profile with 3.6.4+ and 4 beta works fine on my sis laptop on same windows, with same updates. Actually first time it happened was on 32bit version of windows 7 pro. Firefox 3.6.11 (there weren't any newer version out yet) just stopped to work with issues like above described after one of windows updates. Cant pin point which one now cuz it was months ago. My rig is E8200, 6GB DDR2 1066cl5 ram, Gigabyte Ep45-Ds3r, ati 4850. I cant point anything else than just some windows 7 pro update, hardware and plugin container incompatibility. 1 in a million chance that makes this happen and of course I'm the happy winner of firefox issues ^_^. For people asking to switch of plugins and testing other profile. If I downgrade to 3.5 or 3.6.3 change profile to naked new one, then upgrade to 3.6.4+ or 4 beta, and exactly same stuff happens: no GUI, firefox process in tasks with 10-20 threads, and 7-30MB loaded into memory (depending on version, mode used).

    Well I write once again. This time I have solution to my problem. Its HDTunePro 4.5. I admit I do have an not so legit version, and it seems its loaded with some crap, or the HDTunePro itself is. Thing is, after reinstalling whole OS (Win 7 Pro 64bit). With everything: drivers, games, programs. Everything worked, ACDSee, FF4.0, and so on. Then after installing HDTune - magic: FF, ACDSee stopped to work the same way it was before. In a process of finding out what exactly is at fault here (cuz I did install few windows updates with HDTune) I found few things: First, installing that HDTune from its install file, makes FF, ACDSee not work (the loading issue with programs stuck in task manager). But whats funny HDTune itself have the same issue (15 day trial - doesnt boot up more than process in task manager). Patching it with that not so legit thingy makes HDTune work, but all other stuff not. So solution is simple, not using HDTune Pro, at least 4.5 non legit version (HAHA theres a lesson here to not pirate software). Or do a work around - make system restore point, install HDTune, patch it, change extension of exe file (so it will not be *.exe), restore OS to that restore point, change exe extension back to *.exe, done. After this HDTune and all other stuff works.

  • How do i fix this: error message- index.html - error occurred - An FTP error occurred - cannot put index.html. Access denied. The file may not exist, or there could be a permission problem. Make sure you have proper authorization on the server and the ser

    that is...
    index.html - error occurred - An FTP error occurred - cannot put index.html. Access denied. The file may not exist, or there could be a permission problem. Make sure you have proper authorization on the server and the server is properly configured.
    File activity incomplete. 1 file(s) or folder(s) were not completed.
    Files with errors: 1
    index.html
    thanks!

    It's under More Options triangle in the Manage Sites panel.  See screenshot:
    Nancy O.

  • Having trouble running multiple instances of Firefox in XenDesktop 7.1

    We recently upgraded our Citrix environment to XenDesktop 7.1. We published Firefox, but only one user at a time can have the program open. When we try to run multiple sessions, we get this error message "Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system."
    We've had it published in previous Citrix environments with no problems. How do we need to configure Firefox in XenDesktop so that multiple users can run the program at the same time? Thanks.

    I do not understand virtualisation.
    I can however say that ordinarily Firefox needs each user to have a separate profile and for Firefox to open simultaneous multiple instances with separate profiles the ''-no-remote'' argument needs to be used.
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Using_multiple_profiles_-_Firefox
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Opening_a_new_instance_of_your_Mozilla_application_with_another_profile

  • I get multiple instances of Firefox that open and will not close automatically. What is causing this?

    Sometimes I will click on Firefox and it does not open. If I go into task manager it shows that it is running but the program is not active on my desktop. Today I shut down 9 instances that did not automatically close.

    Sometimes I will click on Firefox and it does not open. If I go into task manager it shows that it is running but the program is not active on my desktop. Today I shut down 9 instances that did not automatically close.

  • Why Are There Multiple Instances Of Firefox Preparing To Access Internet According To Firewall Log When I'm Not Launching Them And Nothing Appeared On My Screen

    I had closed Firefox after briefly running it and then tried to reopen it anew but got a message that said "Firefox is already running but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system."
    I logged off my computer, and later restarted. However, when I checked my Firewall log it showed that during the minute I had my computer on earlier there were about a dozen instances of "Firefox is preparing to access the internet" which were recorded just seconds apart.
    I don't have the problem now -- restarting apparently took care of the issue -- but I don't understand why there were so many instances of Firefox preparing to access the internet when I was not clicking on it all those times, the one time I did I got a message that it already was running, and there were no tabs on my screen to reflect all those supposed instances.
    Thanks for any insight that folks can offer.

    Were that Firefox processes or plugin-container processes?
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/Plugin-container_and_out-of-process_plugins
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/What+is+plugin-container
    In case you are using "Clear history when Firefox closes", try to exclude the cookies in case you currently have selected this.
    *Tools > Options > Privacy > Firefox will: "Use custom settings for history": [X] "Clear history when Firefox closes" > Settings
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Clear+Recent+History
    Note that clearing "Site Preferences" clears all exceptions for cookies, images, pop-up windows, software installation, and passwords.
    Firefox will try to remove cookies created by plugins in case you clear the cookies and that can result in plugin-container processes getting created.

  • Problem in creating multiple instance of Jboss running on same machine  ???

    Hi all
    Please tell me steps to create multiple instance of Jboss with diffrent port number.
    Actually i want multiple instance of Jboss with different port number running on same machine.
    I tried with this steps, but it does not work for me.
    In conf/jboss-service.xml i added
       <mbean code="org.jboss.services.binding.ServiceBindingManager"
         name="jboss.system:service=ServiceBindingManager">
         <attribute name="ServerName">ports-01</attribute>
         <attribute name="StoreURL">D:/dev/jboss-4.0.2/docs/examples/binding-manager/sample-indings.xml</attribute>
         <attribute name="StoreFactoryClassName">
           org.jboss.services.binding.XMLServicesStoreFactory
         </attribute>
       </mbean>
       <mbean code="org.jboss.services.binding.ServiceBindingManager"
         name="jboss.system:service=ServiceBindingManager">
         <attribute name="ServerName">ports-02</attribute>
         <attribute name="StoreURL">D:/dev/jboss-4.0.2/docs/examples/binding-manager/sample-bindings.xml</attribute>
         <attribute name="StoreFactoryClassName">
           org.jboss.services.binding.XMLServicesStoreFactory
         </attribute>
       </mbean>But i am getting an exception when i am trying to run jboss server
    16:49:04,656 INFO  [ServiceBindingManager] Using StoreURL: file:/D:/dev/jboss-4.0.2/docs/examples/binding-manager/sample-binding
    16:49:04,750 ERROR [MainDeployer] could not create deployment: file:/D:/dev/jboss-4.0.2/server/default/conf/jboss-service.xml
    org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: Trying to install an already registered mbean: jboss.system:service=ServiceBindingMana
            at org.jboss.system.ServiceCreator.install(ServiceCreator.java:70)
            at org.jboss.system.ServiceConfigurator.internalInstall(ServiceConfigurator.java:153)
            at org.jboss.system.ServiceConfigurator.install(ServiceConfigurator.java:118)
            at org.jboss.system.ServiceController.install(ServiceController.java:202)
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
            at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
            at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
            at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:141)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:80)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:72)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:249)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:644)
            at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:177)
            at $Proxy4.install(Unknown Source)
            at org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer.create(SARDeployer.java:220)
            at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.create(MainDeployer.java:918)
            at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:774)
            at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:738)
            at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:722)
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
            at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
            at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
            at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:141)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:80)
            at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.AbstractInterceptor.invoke(AbstractInterceptor.java:121)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:74)
            at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.invoke(ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.java:127)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:74)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:249)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:644)
            at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:177)
            at $Proxy5.deploy(Unknown Source)
            at org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl.doStart(ServerImpl.java:434)
            at org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl.start(ServerImpl.java:315)
            at org.jboss.Main.boot(Main.java:195)
            at org.jboss.Main$1.run(Main.java:463)
            at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
    Failed to boot JBoss:
    org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentException: Trying to install an already registered mbean: jboss.system:service=ServiceBindingMana
            at org.jboss.system.ServiceCreator.install(ServiceCreator.java:70)
            at org.jboss.system.ServiceConfigurator.internalInstall(ServiceConfigurator.java:153)
            at org.jboss.system.ServiceConfigurator.install(ServiceConfigurator.java:118)
            at org.jboss.system.ServiceController.install(ServiceController.java:202)
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
            at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
            at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
            at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:141)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:80)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:72)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:249)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:644)
            at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:177)
            at $Proxy4.install(Unknown Source)
            at org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer.create(SARDeployer.java:220)
            at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.create(MainDeployer.java:918)
            at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:774)
            at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:738)
            at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:722)
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
            at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
            at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
            at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:141)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:80)
            at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.AbstractInterceptor.invoke(AbstractInterceptor.java:121)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:74)
            at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.invoke(ModelMBeanOperationInterceptor.java:127)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:74)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:249)
            at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:644)
            at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:177)
            at $Proxy5.deploy(Unknown Source)
            at org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl.doStart(ServerImpl.java:434)
            at org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl.start(ServerImpl.java:315)
            at org.jboss.Main.boot(Main.java:195)
            at org.jboss.Main$1.run(Main.java:463)
            at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
    16:49:05,125 INFO  [Server] JBoss SHUTDOWN: Undeploying all packages
    Shutting down
    16:49:05,156 INFO  [Server] Shutdown complete
    Shutdown complete
    Halting VM
    Press any key to continue . . .Please help me on this.
    Thanks in advance

    Then you haven't followed the method correctly. That error is
    addressed specifcally on that site, as that error is the main
    reason for the site. Did you read the note about the "known
    bug" because of the one port that is not included in the
    sample file?
    If you had tried the first method (set up a second IP and
    started both servers with the command line option providing
    an IP) there is no way this error could happen.
    If you followed the second method, and specified a different
    port for every port listed (including the one that is not in the
    sample file per default) then there is, once again, no way that
    this error could happen.
    The error happens on the second server because it is trying
    to bind the same port, using the same address, as the first
    server, which is impossible if you fully implement one of the
    two methods described there.

  • 2 instances of firefox running?

    After re-installing firefox on iMac, tried to launch it. I am getting an error message saying that firefox could only be run once. There's already another fire fox that's running. Checked "activity" and "all processes". no traces of another firefox running.
    - further more, I have been using an unsecure WLAN lately. Could it be that I have been sidejacked?

    Use the '''Feedback''' button that on the toolbar in 4.0beta versions to report issues like that. Mozilla uses that to collect feedback from the testers of 4.0beta, I doubt is they even visit this support forum.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error message when opening pdf attachment in Outlook 2003

    I have several computers in my network running different version of Adobe Acrobat...Adobe 6.0 standard, Adobe 7.0 standard, Adobe 8.0 standard and pro, and Adobe 9.0 standard and pro. The problem I am having with a few of my end users is that when th

  • Ipod Nano video and Ihome to go(26)/ unable to wake to music???

    Have a new nano video and the Ihome 2 go model 26. Have it set up correctly and all functions work on the Ihome except wake to music, it buzzes. You can go to sleep with music but can not set it to wake to music. Contacted Ihome support and they say

  • How to get "save as" back? Lion OS worst

    I hate LION. Since upgrading to Lion I have had all sorts of problem, but the worst thing about Lion is you cant SAVE AS.  How can I get that option back?

  • Exchange security best practice

    Hi I need a white paper on exchange 2013 Security practice. I am not refereeing to the security analyzer. I have to come with a Technical security standard for Exchange 2013. Regards Biscay

  • Forecast consumption within Calender month

    Hi, When the forecast is released from Demand Planning to Supply Planning (SNP) in weekly buckets there will be crossover of the forecast for the weeks that are in the Month end/Month Beginning, the week could fall into different months. Even though