Multiple interface switch commands

I have seen it done a few times where multiple switch ports are set with the same parameters with one command. Can someone help me find a document that will describe setting multiple switch port interfaces with the same command, ie. switchport mode access for interfaces 2 - 22 or switchport access vlan 2 for interfaces 5 - 10. Now, here is the biggy, I would like to do this on my older 3500XL switches and my newer 3550 & 3560 switches.

Hi,
Please take a look at this document explaining the 'interface range' command.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1834/products_feature_guide09186a00800803ff.html
Regards.

Similar Messages

Global vs interface switch command

Hello, If I have a command globally which applies on all switch ports but then I want to configure one port with a different command not apply the global command on the switch. When i configure that port will it take effect the new command configure for that port and disregard the global command that was apply on the other ports?

Well without testing and not knowing more details about what command you wish to try - I think that more specific (in this case interface command) will take precedence above global one...
Plese do some testing - in this particular case it's about 5min job...
BR,
Dragan

Frame-relay interface-dlci switched command

Hi,
I want to understand the frame-relay interface-dlci switched command on router.
I know it is used for local switching, but what this command exectly does? is it emulating router to behave like a frame-relay switch for particular interfaces (not all interfaces)?
To use this command router serial interface needs to be have only layer 2 information or it can use that interface for layer 3 connectivity also?
regards
Devang Patel

Hi,
Thanks for your replies...
In FRoMPLS we use connect configuration on global configuration mode with xconnect command to configure FRoMPLS. then how frame-replay interface-dlci switched will work with FRoMPLS, will it add any additional feature to configuration? I am just trying to understand the use of this command.
will after putting this command i will have functionality to configure L2 and L3 VLAN configuration on same interface?
am i correct with my understanding posted in this reply as well as my initial post?
thanks,
Devang Patel

Is the "show interface brief" command 100% safe?

I am planning on performing a health check on multiple Cisco SAN switches. This check will be performed five or more times a day. I know that the "show" commands are usually safe commands, but I have seen instances where "show tech-support" has caused the supervisor to restart. This type of outage is not acceptable.
1) Does anyone know of an instance where "show interface brief" has caused any kind of problem?
2) I currently use Device Manager to perform health checks. Does Device Manager use a "show interface" command to display port states?
3) What kind of CPU usage does "show interface brief" have on a SAN switch?
4) Does anyone have a low-level explanation of what happens when a "show interface brief" command is executed?
5) Is it safe to run "show interface brief" many times a day and every day of the year?

i can tell you that we run "show int fc X" every 5 minutes. We use a perl script that telnets to the switch every 5 minutes, runs "show int fc X" on specific ports, dumps output to log file on the server and then parses it for link status. This is how we monitor our DWDM links.

How to stop multiple auto-switching to address bar every time I open a new tab and try to type something anywhere outside of address bar?

How to stop multiple auto-switching to address bar every time I open a new tab and try to type something anywhere outside of address bar? Like something just wants me to use that embedded search when u type something not-web-address in address bar and hit enter. And the most ridiculous thing is that it happens repeatedly on like every second, like I just move down from address bar and start typing again, but then again it switches me to address bar, and 3, 4 times like that. And the result is also that I can't see the address of that page.
I think its has something to do with my AVG antivirus, because this started the same time some AVG Nation started to appear in every new tab i open (and thats also irritating me, I read about it here on support.mozilla.org and it seems that the only solution is to completely reinstall Firefox, but I dont want to lose all my settings) but when i type something in address bar and hit enter it opens the search results in Google.
Please try to help me, I like Firefox but I must switch to Chrome until I fix this problem.
Thanks in advance

First, please update to Firefox 32. 22 is no longer support nor is it secure. Then let us know if you still have this problem. [[Update Firefox to the latest version]]

How to use multiple Interfaces for the same BS?

Hi @ ,
Is it possible to have a scenarion where i am using multiple interfaces in the same BS based upon some conditional field in the message.
I amnot able to get the solution I know with condition editor I can have multiple receivers but in my scenarion based upon message fiels i have to decide which BAPI to be used and wht mapping and then post it to the same System
Any help will be highly rewarded
Regards

Hi-
Yes it is possible you can use multimapping for mapping the interfaces.
To know more about multimapping see
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/21/6faf35c2d74295a3cb97f6f3ccf43c/content.htm
Some more helpful links
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible

Multiple Interfaces on a single web service URL

we have a scenario where we have a multiple interfaces that are related to SD that needs to be exposed to another system. When we generate the WSDL from XI - it seems we can do only for one interface at a time.
Is there a way - where in we can expose a single URL and treat these interfaces as web methods on that single URL? (similar to .Net or Java)
If yes - how do we do that?
Thanks.

That will not be possible. Instead you have to expose only one interface which takes generic data as input. In the mapping, depending on dat, you should map them to various other interfaces which would definetly make your scenario complex..
In XI each outbound interface is a separate web service (method).
VJ

Single SOAP receiver adapter for multiple interfaces

Hi,
I have to send multiple interfaces like Vendor, Customer, Material to one receiver.
I want to configure only one communication channel (receiver SOAP adapter) to send all these interfaces. Is this possible?
Currently I am provided with different URLs from the receiver system as below.
http://host:port/Services/Vendor.wsdl
http://host:port/Services/customer.wsdl
http://host:port/ServicesMaterial.wsdl
I will be having 3 Sender agreement, 3 receiver determination, 3 interface determination and 3 Receiver agreement.
I want only one SOAP reciever adapter which goes inside all the above 3 Receiver agreement.
So When I give the target url as http://host:port/Services, the messages fail.
But When I specify the full targert url in the adapter as http://host:port/Services/Vendor.wsdl then it works.
Which means I would have to create as many communication channel as interfaces.
Is there a work around for this?

hi kantheri,
For this, we have to fill the TargetURL and the SOAPAction in Receiver Communication channel dynamically.
So, we need to write UDF in Message Mappings using DynamicConfiguration to fill the TargetURL and the SOAPAction Dynamically.
DynamicConfigurationKey keyURL = DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","THeaderSOAPACTION");
DynamicConfigurationKey targetURL=DynamicConfigurationKey.create("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/SOAP","TServerLocation");
// access dynamic configuration
DynamicConfiguration conf = (DynamicConfiguration) container
.getTransformationParameters()
.get(StreamTransformationConstants.DYNAMIC_CONFIGURATION);
conf.put(keyURL,"Soap action");
conf.put(targetURL,"target url");
return "";
In this UDF, we are filling the TargetURL in u201CTServerLocationu201D message attribute and SOAPAction in u201CTHeaderSOAPActionu201D message attribute.
So, whenever we execute this corresponding operation these values will be filled in receiver communication channel at runtime.
TargetURL- Give some dummy URL or http://
SOAPAction - *
regards,
ganesh.

BPM using multiple interface

Hi All,
i have a sceanrio where i have one sender idoc and multiple(5) soap receivers.so i have five interface that have same sender idoc and different soap receiver.Soap is syncronous and sending us the response of that message.
So we have to create a scenario as IDOCSoapRequestSoapResponse---File for each interface
I know it requires BPM to fullfill the condition of multiple interface.Please suggest the BPM design to achive the scenario.
Regards
Laxmi Bhushan

hi Laxmi Bhushan Jha ,
IDOCSoapRequestSoapResponse---File for each interface
As per my knowledge that is poosiable and simple with SOAP Lookup in ESR Mapping
for Soap Lookup:
Webservice Calls From a User Defined Function.
and coming to id:
in receiver determination , we need to define multiple recievers
in interface determiination, we define multiple operation mappings.
thanks,

Single IDOC to Multiple Interface Mapping

We have a requirement in our project where one masterdata IDOC will be sent from a SAP MDM box and will be transformed to a target IDOC and be sent to an SAP SNC box. However, the scenario is that depending on the contents of the IDOC, there can be multiple IDOCs that need to be created. For example, the single MDM IDOC has V1, V2 and V3 values then the IDOCS that should be sent to the SAP SNC box should be three.
The IT head of the customer decided against using Enhanced Interface Determination (since the problem can be easily solved using a 1:n mapping) due to the complexity especially when the solution is rolled out to other regions as each region has it's own logic (currently, the other implementation has only 1:1 mapping so there is no problem). I had developed a 1:n mapping but the resulting map is too big and very complex.
What I tried to do is to create separate mappings for each scenario that an IDOC needs to be generated out of the values from the received IDOC in XI and then define rules in the Interface Determination. Problem is that XI throws an error stating that multiple interfaces are found. So I cannot use Interface Determination to trigger creation of multiple IDOCS of the same type with different values from a single IDOC sent by the same SAP box.
Question is, is there any way to solve this requirement without using Enhanced Receiver Determination. I was thinking of BPM but not really sure how to do it.
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards,
Rommel Mendoza
Hewlett Packard Asia-Pacific, Ltd.

Thanks a lot for that.
For example, We have this input Message:
<ZMATMA>
<IDOC>
 <E1MARAM>
 <E1MARMM>
 <MEINH>IT</MEINH>
 </E1MARMM>
 <E1MARMM>
 <MEINH>CS</MEINH>
 </E1MARMM>
 <E1MARMM>
 <MEINH>SW</MEINH>
 </E1MARMM>
 </E1MARAM>
</IDOC>
</ZMATMA>
then there should be an output of:
<SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<IDOC>
 <BUOM>IT</BUOM>
</IDOC>
</SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<IDOC>
 <BUOM>CS</BUOM>
</IDOC>
</SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<SAVEMULTIPLE204>
<IDOC>
 <BUOM>SW</BUOM>
</IDOC>
</SAVEMULTIPLE204>
The logic is when the MEINH field of the ZMATMA02 IDOC has the values: IT, CS and SW, create one IDOC for each.
Thanks in advance!
Edited by: Rommel Mendoza on Nov 6, 2008 7:30 PM

Idoc to multiple interfaces in XI

Hi,
how can we handle same Idoc ( MATMAS.MATMAS03) sending to multiple interfaces in XI otherthan using multi mapping?
If we develop one scenario now and in future if you want to send same idoc to different systems, do we have to change the existing interface?. Alternatively is it possible to add another interface?. Please clarify.

ok, as it's case 1, I think it's easier.
You have two ways:
1. Inside ID, use your previous Scenario:
=> after that, you will have 1 scenario...
1.1 Create a new Business Process (BPM_2)
1.2 Inside your existing Receiver Determination, add your new BPM_2 as a receiver (use righ-click + "insert above").
1.3 with your triplet "Sender_name + Sender_interface + BPM_2", create your Interface Determination
1.4 As receiver is a BPM, Receiver Agreement is not needed.
Then, you need to configure the step "BPM_2 -> Receiver_2"
1.5 Create a Receiver Determination between your BPM_2 (sender) and your receiver_2.
1.6 create your Interface Determination
1.7 create your Receiver Agreement (receiver adapter)
2. Inside ID, use a new Scenario:
=> after that, you will have 2 scenarios which use the SAME Receiver Determination "Matmas -> Receiver_1 + BPM_2"
2.1 create a new Scenario
2.2 ADD to this scenario your existing Receiver Determination ("Matmas -> Receiver_1").
2.2 do the same steps than "1.1 -> 1.7"
At the end, you will have:
Matmas --> | Receiver_1 => File_1 with single Idoc
 | BPM_2
 BPM_2 --> Receiver_2 => File_2 with collected IDocs
Mickael
Message was edited by: Mickael Huchet

SWIG - C++/Java and multiple interface inheritance - SWIG typemaps

In C++ I have the following. Can someone explain how to use SWIG typemaps to accomplish multiple interface inheritance in Java? I understand there is a javainterfaces typemap built into SWIG however I am such a newb with SWIG I really don't know where to start.
class IRemoteSyncIO
public:
virtual ~IRemoteSyncIO () {}
protected:
IRemoteSyncIO () {}
private:
IRemoteSyncIO (const IRemoteSyncIO&);
IRemoteSyncIO& operator= (const IRemoteSyncIO&);
class IRemoteAsyncIO
public:
virtual ~IRemoteAsyncIO () {}
protected:
IRemoteAsyncIO () {}
private:
IRemoteAsyncIO (const IRemoteAsyncIO&);
IRemoteAsyncIO& operator= (const IRemoteAsyncIO&);
class RemoteMpe : public IRemoteSyncIO, public IRemoteAsyncIO
}Thanks!

Actually now I understand what you mean.... Ok, now I am going to modify the problem slightly and add Interface2 into the picture. The new code is:
interface Interface1<SelfType extends Interface1<SelfType>>
interface Interface2
class Superclass implements Interface1<Superclass>
class Dependant<Type extends Interface1<Type>>
 public static <Type extends Interface1<Type> & Interface2> Dependant<Type> getInstance(Class<Type> c)
 return new Dependant<Type>();
class Subclass extends Superclass implements Interface2
public Subclass()
 Dependant<Subclass> dependant = Dependant.getInstance(Subclass.class);
}Now, previously I could replace:
Dependant<Subclass> dependant = Dependant.getInstance(Subclass.class);
with
Dependant<Superclass> dependant = Dependant.getInstance(Superclass.class);
and it solved the problem, but now that Type must implement Interface2 I cannot.
The reason I added this requirement is that this is actually what is going on in my applicationI had made mistakely omited this detail from the original use-case.
Can you think up of a possible solution to this new use-case?
Thanks,
Gili

Assigning multiple interfaces for Oracle API Gateway (OAG)

We are deploying Oracle API Gateway to throttle our incoming API requests. We would like to keep the incoming external API requests separate from the internal configuration management so that they go through different interfaces when accessing the OAG server. This is mainly for security reasons so that the external people won’t have access to the interface used by internal operations team to manage OAG. Based on your experience, is there any standard best practice to accomplish this? We were thinking to perhaps use two of the server’s network interfaces with different IPs, one for the incoming API requests and the other for the internal admin management of OAG. But not sure if this is the best way to do what we need. We are aware of OAG's capability to support two separate ports to handle this situation, but would like a more secure set-up that could completely eliminate external access to the OAG management done by the IT team.
Would appreciate any thoughts on best practices used regarding multiple interfaces for OAG set-up. Thank you. Oracle Marketing Cloud.

You are on the right track.
Here is how you can achieve this:
You can use multiple network interfaces on the UNIX machine and setup networking/routing in such a way that all external traffic comes on on one card and is routed internally via a different card.
Segregate difference types of services (i.e to be used by external clients vs internal apps) into difference different "Service Groups". Have each of these service groups listen on different port + NIC card (under Listeners, you can define a port to list to list on a specific network address and port instead of *).
Setup additional protection for services that will be accessed by external clients. Use "Threatening Content " filter to protect your services.
Setup 2 way SSL for the interface that will be called by external clients. Setup a DN based authorization check if you want to have both authentication and authorization.
Hope this helps.
-Thanks,
Ankit Kumar

"Peer-switch" command on vPC domain and spanning-tree priority interaction

Hi guy,
We have 2 N7K (N7KA and N7KB) which will be running vPC in hybird and pure vPC environment.
I have a question about the Hybird and pure vPC environment. With the "peer-switch" command enable, should i tune the spanning-tree priority to be the same for all the vlan running on vPC on both N7KA and N7KB? This way, when i enter the "sh spanning-tree vlan X(vPC vlan) detail" command on N7K, it will list both N7K announc itself as "We are the root of the spanning tree".Also the switch running spanning-tree with N7K vPC vlan (Hybird), will see both N7K has the same priority (4096), and it is not desirable for a spanning-tree environment. Therefore, i used the "spanning-tree pseudo-information" on N7KB to tune the spanning-tree priority to "8192" and the switch running spanning-tree with N7K will list N7KB has a priority of 8192(perfect).
However, I notice some strange "show" output on the switch running Port-channel with the N7KA and N7KB. The "Designated bridge" priority is flapping as show on the switch. It is constantly changing between "4096 and 8192" with the same vPC system wide mac address.
Entering the "sh spanning-tree vlan X detail" command repeatly on switch with port-channel toward N7KA and N7KB.
>>sh spanning-tree vlan 10 detail
Port 65 (Port-channel1) of VLAN10 is root forwarding
Port path cost 3, Port priority 128, Port Identifier 128.65.
Designated root has priority 4106, address 0013.05ee.bac8
Designated bridge has priority 4106, address 0013.05ee.bac8
Designated port id is 144.2999, designated path cost 0
Timers: message age 15, forward delay 0, hold 0
Number of transitions to forwarding state: 1
Link type is point-to-point by default
BPDU: sent 5, received 603
one sec later.
>>sh spanning-tree vlan 10 detail
Port 65 (Port-channel1) of VLAN10 is root forwarding Port path cost 3, Port priority 128, Port Identifier 128.65. Designated root has priority 4106, address 0013.05ee.bac8 Designated bridge has priority 8202, address 0013.05ee.bac8 Designated port id is 144.2999, designated path cost 0 Timers: message age 15, forward delay 0, hold 0 Number of transitions to forwarding state: 1 Link type is point-to-point by default BPDU: sent 5, received 603
Configuration:
N7KA
spanning-tree vlan 1-10 priority 4096
vpc domain 200
peer-switch
N7KB
spanning-tree vlan 1-10 priority 4096spanning-tree pseudo-information vlan 1-10 designated priority 8192
vpc domain 200
peer-switch

We have a issue similar to this in our environment. I am trying to upgrade the existing 3750 stack router with 2 Nexus 5596 running VPC between them. For the transition I have planned to create a channel between 3750 stack and 5596's. Once this environment is set, my plan is to migrate all the access switches to N5k.
The issue is when I connect the 3750 port channel to both N5Ks, all the Vlans on 3750 started to flap. If I connect the port channel to only one N5K everything is normal; but when I connect the port channel to both N5K running VPC, vlans are flapping. Any idea what is going wrong here? Am I missing something?

Launching multiple interface at one time

Can we launch multiple interface at one go? I have scenario .In that scenario I have created a package and defined the multiple stages. After the completion of one stage next step will be launched. In one step I have to populate 5 tables for different kind of validation and transformation and after successful validation I have to do next processing. For this I have to create 5 different interfaces. But I don’t want to run these 5 interface one by one .I want to do it in parallel. Can I achieve this?
Regards,
Vineet

Hi,
I couldn't see this option at diagram. Could you, please, give more details about how to put "multiples" next steps? I could use just one. (what ODI version are you?)
In the way that I know, you need to generate scenarios of the 5 interfaces and "drag and drop" it at a package and create the flow (green line) between them.
At each interface scenario, go to options tab, "Synchronous/Asynchronous" option and choose Asynchronous.
This will start the interfaces at parallel.

Multiple interface switch commands

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for