Multiple notifications for an Inspection lot

Hello
I  would like to create one notification by defect  keyed for an inspection lot .
If I work with serial numbers I can create one notification by defect
If I don't use serial numbers , all defects are linked to a single notification even though I remove the tick  for "One notification by Inspection lot " in the Inspection lot category customizing ?
I would like to know if there is a way to do that.
Thanks for your help
Regards
Regis

It seems this link has got some useful replies:
Multiple notification creation for defects recorded during UD
Also other similar discussion:
Multiple notification against single inspection lot (03 inspection type)

Similar Messages

  • Multiple notification against single inspection lot (03 inspection type)

    Dear friends
    While recording the defects multiple times against single inspection lot (03type) , all the defects are added in single notification, but my client requirement is they want different notification.  if any body knows please tell me.
    Note : in inspection type there is a option of multiple notification against single inspection lot, but this is
    not working (i think it will work only serial number,equipment and  functional location get changed)
    Please do the needful
    Regards

    Hi Karthikeyan
    As you mentioned it is not possible to create notification  other than based on the object types.
    A work out can be make an action box in the notification for creating another notification with the help of ABAP ( call transaction QM01) and while doing this the entire datas of the inspection lot gets copied into the notification. you may have to use a user exit also.
    Defect can be recorded in the item level by the user.
    Sounds difficult but certainly possible
    Regards
    gajesh

  • How partial inspection is done for a inspection lot & vendor payment done based on inspection result

    Dear Gurus,
    In our business 1000 bag material is received in one material document. So one Inspection lot is created.
    Now business take randomly 10 bags from that 1000 bag & inspected. The Bags are inspected on various parameters such as Weight , Fabric , Valve Size , Cross Sec Area, Print Quality , Stitching Thread , etc . The values for all this types of parameters are prepared in an excel sheet in a prescribed format.
    The Values for each Quality Parameters are then matched with the desired prescribed average figures.
    Based on the Values which deviate from "Average" figures , deductions are computed
    Logic is 1% for single defect in a bag for 1 parameter . Likewise if more defects is found then add 1% in multiples
    e.g 1% + 5 defects then .05 * basic Raw material cost .
    This figure along with proper description is recorded under "Remarks" column of the report format and send to Accounts department for the
      deduction process from Vendor
    we need to capture the inspection parameters in system as per the above process.
    And please tell me how I configure this process in SAP .
    Thanks & Regards,
    Bubai

    Hi Bubai,
    you can create a QM Control Key (which is used to QM View of Material Master) which you have to set the indicator Block Invoice. This indicator is blocked invoice with blocking reason I (I = Inspection) if there is still no usage decision for the inspection lot or the inspection lot is reject.
    (SPRO -> Quality Management -> QM in Logistics -> QM in Procurement -> Define Control Keys).
    Best Regards,
    Apostolos

  • Error in Setup Tables for QM Inspection Lots

    Hi,
    I have an issue when I attempt to fill the setup tables for QM that I receive the following error for the Inspection Lots (QV) only. When I fill the setup tables for Notifications and Inspection Results, then these are OK and use the same standard function module 'qmex_inspection_lot_import_ini'.
    "Internal error in program SAPLQMEX, function module / subroutine qmex_inspection_lot_import_ini, code 1".
    Has anyone any ideas of the cause or have you experienced this before?
    Thanks,
    Scott

    Hi,
    The most likely reason that leads to the above error message in your
    system is an inconsistency of the inspection lots.
    To get the inconsistent inspection lot,please check your system in the
    following way:
    - transaction OLIQBW for running Setup table
    - switch on debugging mode
    - set break point in the function  QMEX_INSPECTION_LOT_IMPORT_INI
    on the line:
    ELSE.
       MESSAGE e011(qmex) WITH sy-repid
                               'qmex_inspection_lot_import_ini'
                               '1'.
      > then excecute F8 to go to this break point.
    - double klick on ' l_qals-prueflos'
    on line 77 in the same function  QMEX_INSPECTION_LOT_IMPORT_INI:
    READ TABLE qave_tab INTO l_qave
                        WITH KEY prueflos = l_qals-prueflos  <      here !
                        BINARY SEARCH.
    Please check following note:
    305244 Missing operations for the inspection lot
    89541 Inspection lot exists w/o status object: EM BS001
    536769 Inspection lots without status object
    Thanks,
    Venkat

  • Standard Report for all inspection lots

    Dear all,
    Pls guide me from where I can retrieve the data for result recorded for MIC, inspection lot wise.
    Actually currently working for Pharma company where we are using, Inspection Plan (task list type Q), with inspection point 200 u2013 Physical sample. Materials are being managed through Batches, so each inspection lot is having separate batch number.
    Now the requirement is to find a STD sap report that can retrieve us the result for a material for all the inspection lots (Batches) it have, in the report type from where I can down load it to word/excel.
    In short, the report should contain, Material, results for all MICs under all inspection lots.
    I have already tried out;
    QGP1 but it shoe the result for only a MIC at a time.
    QGA2 but not able to visualize results for all MICs at once.
    MCXB but, gives only the quantity of MICs not the results of it.
    Regards,
    Shyamal Joshi

    Hi Craig,
    The requriement is to have results for the Inspection lots only, not for the batch values.
    The report MCXD is giving the quantitative analysis for the batches, I will be very pleased if you suggest me any report that gives me the results (values entered during result recording) of these MICs, inspection lot wise, just as the MCXD give quantitative.
    I think the term BATCH is creating confusion, that is Y u have suggested me CL03N, but as I have mentioned eariler also, currenlt working with Pharma company, where each manufacturing lot is give a batch number, (in sap terminology the Batch management function, MSC1N), that is why i freauently used BATCH. Sorry for that communicational error from my side, and I am very much thank full to you for your each valuable comment, suggestion.
    Regards,
    Shyamal Joshi

  • Collective UD for 04 inspection lot origin

    Hi All,
    I need to know about collectived UD for 04 inspection lot origin. In QA16, I do not get any 04 lots. Do I have to go for QA41? Then what are the prerequisites and configurations?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi Sujit,
    I tried this and made a variant in QA41 too. But some its not working. I searched in google and SDN and found all steps are followed, but its just not working.
    My settings are:
    1. Auto UD time taken as 12 hours in customizing
    2. Auto UD box ticked for material
    3. In QA41, created a variant (In full screen)
    4. Inspection lot selection taken as order confirmed
    5. UD codes, plant all set
    Now what i feel i am mistaking in scheduling the variant. Can anyone please let me know the steps to schedule it?
    My scenario is: for 04 type materials, I want to do a collective UD when lots are OK
    And Do I have to assign to any material?
    Thanks!
    Edited by: SAPQM11 on Sep 15, 2010 8:00 AM

  • Multiple result recording for Manual inspection Lot using inspection point

    I want to record inspection result for inspection type 89 against *inspection point*. Then I create new inspection point and assign it in quality plan. Then I have done the multiple result recoding against one manual inspection lot in DEV server. But when it is going to QAS server then error is coming during result recoding. Error is "The results transaction cannot be used for
    inspection" Message no. QE094.
    Plz give me the solution to record the result.

    Reason is very simple : the  the inspection point definition in the task list header is incompatible with the sampling procedure assigned to the characteristic.Make sure that you select the appropriete radio button in QDV1 while creating sampling procedure and assign the same against each of the MIC's in the task list.
    Make sure that the sample tab in QA02 is pressed while assigning the inspection specification & status of the lot is REL

  • Multiple results recording for Delivery inspection lot

    Hi Gurus,
    My requirement is to configure for quality results recording for sales delivery document. Where client wants to record Customer, supplier, Umpire, etc results record for inspection characteristics.
    I got response from few Sapiens that I should use Inspection point concept for multiple results recording. Could anyone cna tell me how can I do this.
    Your help will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Kumar

    Hi Kumar,
    Okay!
    First of all letu2019s try to understand whether inspection points are really suitable for your requirement or not. Accordingly further errors can be eliminated. I just try to understand.
    A- Using Inspection Points
    1.     Inspection points are used when you inspect the same parameters again and again.
    2.     When you click on results tab in QA32, system asks you put some identification number. Letu2019s say you put A1 and then press enter. Thereafter you record the actual results (LENGTH, WIDTH etc.) You save this without giving UD.
    3.     For the next time when you again click on results for the same inspection lot, system again asks you to put identification number. This time suppose you put A2. Then again you record the results (LENGTH, WIDTH) for A2.
    4.     Likewise you can retrieve the inspection results from system with respect to inspection point (identification point).
    5.     Typically this can be used for chemical industries where you record the temperature of the same chemical after every ½ an hour. Here 10:00 am, 10:30 am can be used as identifications numbers. As a result of which you can get the information that at 10:00 am temperature was 40 Deg and at 10:30 am it was 75 degree Celsius.
    If your requirement resembles this situation, then only the use of inspection points would be fruitful.
    B- Without Inspection Points
    But if you want to record the readings by various agencies like customer, umpire (refer following pattern)and want to compare them there are other ways.
    1.     Reading by your inspector
    a.     LENGTH u2013 100, 101, 102mm (average is 101mm)
    b.     WIDTH     - 10.50, 10.50, 10.60mm (average is 31.6mm)
    2.     Reading by customer
    a.     LENGTH u2013 100, 101, 102mm (average is 101mm)
    b.     WIDTH     - 10.50, 10.50, 10.60mm (average is 31.6mm)
    3.     Reading by umpire
    a.     LENGTH u2013 100, 101, 102mm (average is 101mm)
    b.     WIDTH     - 10.50, 10.50, 10.60mm (average is 31.6mm)
    You can achieve this without using inspection points also. For this in QP02 you need to create 3 operation; Inspector, Customer and umpire respectively. Feed the MICs in each of these operations. When you click on result tab system will throw pop up for these 3 operations. Double click on Umpire if you want to record results noted by umpire. Likewise for rest of the operations. You can do this even after UD also (after 1-2 months also). You need to use MIC with control indicator as long term characteristics for this in QS23.
    Regarding averaging of results u2013 This can be achieved using single result recording MIC with or without inspection points. Use appropriate sampling procedure. When you feed results in QA32 system automaticaaly averages out the reading. This can be viewable against phi symbol.
    Finally you did mention that u201Chere I am not getting the newly created inspection lotsu201D. Does that mean inspection lot (10 origin) has not created?
    Regards,
    Anand Rao

  • Resetting a sample for an inspection lot

    How to reset a sample to an inspection lot, and transfer stock to inspection lot.

    Try using the transaction codes QAC2 and QAC3 for both of your queries.
    or open the inspection lot in change mode and assign the sample you would like.
    Hope this helps you.

  • For the Inspection lot status is CRTD instead of REL status

    Dear Experts,
    Today I have observed strange behavoir of the system.
    For the Finished material 04 insp type, Every day we used to generate inspection lots automatically with MB31for 101 mov type.
    generated inspection lot status will be REL bydefault. Today we observed system status is CRTD.
    I have checked any material master/Inspection plan been change or not, but it was not changed.
    Please suggest how this behavior happen suddenly.
    Regards
    Don

    Dear Don,
                    Check in SPRO for inspection type configuration. Some body has changed the 'Task list usage' for Inspection type.
    If you are using '1' and if there is other one except '1' then system will create inspection lot in CRTD status.
    You need to change it manually in QA02 and assigne plan.
    Thanks and Regards
    Harriesh.

  • Enhancement for QA01 (Inspection Lot)

    For creation of new inspection lot via QA01; upon saving, user wants to disable printing of the inspection lot form (sapscript using standard print program 'RQEEAS20') when the system status 'QALS-KZSKIPLOT' = 'X'. May I know how should I go about to start? (if user exit? which user exit?)

    Hello,
    Here i suggest you that if you are using Exit for UD then in that only just apply one code where program first will check the QAMR/QASR etc. all result table field w.r.t inspection lot and if fields found empty means no data or RR then system wont pass UD code for UD posting.
    Or just make first MIC as required MIC and apply the code in that first MIC, if that MIC value is blank then again system wont allo UD.
    Secondly, Status profile maintenance is also an another stdn way to execute the requirement.
    Regards

  • DMR for skipping inspection lots

    Hi friends,
    I am new to QM. I want to create DMR for skipping four lots after one inspected lot.
    Can you please tell me, configuration steps reqd.
    Thanks in advance.

    Tcode QDR1 > set name > at lot creation > next >
    stage 10 > click on insp stage, Severity 04
    stage 20 > tick on skip
    stahe 30 > Severity 04
    select both lines & click on stage change
    stage 10
    no. of insp : 1
    new insp stage : 20
    rej : 1
    new insp stage : 10
    stage 20
    no. of skip : 4
    new insp stage : 30
    rej : 1
    new insp stage : 10
    stage 30
    no. of insp : 1
    new insp stage : 20
    rej : 1
    new insp stage : 10
    & save
    now u can apply this DMR in inspction plan
    It may help you.

  • SAP QM Default Inspection Plan for all Inspection Lots created in the Plant

    Scenario: We have a Proto type plant in which Daily 15 to 20 materials are created every day. We have only one inspection plan for all the materials.
    Problem: We don't want to do material assignment in the Inspection Plant header every time a new material is created
    Requirement: Is there any way to default the inspection plan for all the inspection lots created in the Plant by Standard Configuration or User Exit.
    Your answers will be much appreciated and rewarded.
    Thanks in advance,
    Thiyagu

    Hi,
    In our case Creation of Inspection lots are controlled by QM View of Material Master. Our problem is to find alternative for assignment of New Materials in the Plan header in Tcode QP02, as we have only ONE INSPECTION PLAN. So our expection is all QM Inspection Lot created in the Plant should always get assigned to the SINGLE INSPECTION PLAN, with out doing any assignment of material in the Plan.
    Thanks,
    Thiyagu.

  • Batch not created for the Inspection lot?

    Hi Experts,
    I have created a  the production order by inputting the Batch in the GR tab and released the production order. The release of Production order will create a Type 03 lot , but surprisingly it doesn't show the Batch in the Batch field when i look the inspection lot that was created by release of production order, instead it shows blank. I have checked the material master and it is batch managed material. Please let me know where I'm going wrong.
    Configuration- Batch is unique at material level indicator checked
    my plant has Batch status management indicator
    Please find the screenshot below for type 03 lot and also the Batch management indicator in material master in sales/general view, work scheduling and warehouse1.
    Thanks,
    Pavan

    Hi Pavan,
    According to SAP Note 50618, you may consider to implement the correction on that note or use partial lot assignment.
    For partial lot assignment, you can find the setting in Routing header and customizing in SPRO with path: Quality Management - Quality Planning - Inspection Planning - General - Define Identifier for Inspection Points.
    There's also another discussion regarding this issue. Please find here.
    Regards,
    Julian

  • Enhancement for QA32 Inspection lot stock tabs

    Hello everybody:
       In QA32  user can do UD operation in "Characteristics" tabs and do Posting operation in "Inspection lot stock" tabs.
       phase 1: I use QEVA0010 enhancement to check UD  in "Characteristics" tabs and it works.
       phase 2: I need to check  the value of  "To unrestricted use" field in "Inspection lot stock" tabs but I can't find enhancement to do that.
       In my company, some user can use QA32 to do UD and do posting. But some of them often do posting without UD. In QA32 there is only a warning  message if you do posting without UD. So I need to check when user enter value in "Inspection lot stock" tabs some conditions must be satisfied (like UD).
      Is there any enhancement to use for my issue? thank you.
      ps. I have already tried QEVA0001. it doesn't wok.
      attachment is the picture of warning message.

    Hello,
    Here i suggest you that if you are using Exit for UD then in that only just apply one code where program first will check the QAMR/QASR etc. all result table field w.r.t inspection lot and if fields found empty means no data or RR then system wont pass UD code for UD posting.
    Or just make first MIC as required MIC and apply the code in that first MIC, if that MIC value is blank then again system wont allo UD.
    Secondly, Status profile maintenance is also an another stdn way to execute the requirement.
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for

  • Discontinuation functionality with production orders

    Dear Guru's, Can anyone please confirm: is the functionality for discontinuation of a material (including follow-up material) not available with production orders? Example: in our system we have component A that is followed up by component B. This is

  • Moving FCP Studio from G5 to Laptop - user's license?

    I've been running FCP Studio Pro on my G5 Tower. I've just bought a MacBook Pro - to take a project on a location shoot. Am I legally entitled to install my 'single owner' FCP Studio on my laptop? And thus have it installed on my studio G5 and my lap

  • Backup and Sync Frenzy

    Did an erase and install on my iMac G5 of Leopard, then installed Backup 3.1.2. It has not stopped since. The screen just keeps popping up, even though I have it backing up weekly. I can "force quit" it, but it simply arises from the dead, demanding

  • 12c- Middleware feature - Import Assertion template to middleware domain

    Hi All, I have integrated SOA domain to Oracle Enterprise Manager 12c and not able to find the way to import the policy templates to my domain. Earlier we did this by using "Import from file" option using Web Services Assertion Templates. I have gone

  • Safari update ruins email connection

    After yesterday's Safari update, links from my emails will not connect to it. This is a source of big distress -- my business depends on those links! Please help.