Multiple order settlement allowed

Hello Experts,
I have come across case wher,
Production order is Settled via KO88- FI Document posted for WIP
Again When I tried to settlet via KO88 for the same period/same Order- System allowed me settle and posted FI document for WIP with same value.
As per my understanding system should not allow me to post.
Any config missing ?
WIP is booked twice. How to reverse.
Please advise.
Regards
Raghav

HI,
search SAPNET using KO88 / double or something similar. There are some notes (586673, 441977) but I cannot tell you if they are relevant in your case / release.
This system behaviour should not occur normally.
best regards, Christian

Similar Messages

  • Maintenance Order Settlement Authorization

    Dear Experts,
    I have the following scenario.
    Maintenance Order types:
    A1, A2, A3 and A4
    User ID1 and User ID2, both are having as of now authorization for T.Code: KO88.
    Now, For User ID1, I want to restrict his authorization for order type A4.
              For User ID2, I want to allow this user for only order type A4.
    Basically I want to restrict user to settle certain type of orders.
    Thanks in advance.
    Rajat

    Dear Rajat,
    Please check following Two ways of achieving your requirement.
    Please check the Authorization Roles provided to the user who is currently doing Settlement in table AGR_USERS & Check if any of these Authorization Roles has value AUFART by passing in field FIELD in table AGR_1251. you can also pass your order types in field Low to check if he is getting Order Type Authorization from somewhere.
    If you get positive Result, Copy the Object & Split your role to restrict the authorization for user by chnaging desired Order Types.
    This will confirm if SAP Check Order Type authorization while doing Order Settlement.
    If the result is Negative, then You can follow following Cutom way to achieve same.
    Create a Cutom Tcode (Ex: ZPMKO88) and ask user to enter Order Numbers in Selection Screen. You can give Multiple Option over there.
    Once user enters the Order Numbers, Read the Order Types for same from Table AUFK & Perform Authority Check using Authorization Object I_AUART.
    If this check is successful, Call Transaction Code KO88 & Pass these Order Numbers with Default parameters in it for Settlement.
    You will have to restrict the User Role for this Object for desired Order Types.
    I am unable to test Option 1 in my system hence request you to check it the way I explained.
    For Option 2, you will need help from your ABAP & Securities Consultant.
    Do let me know if Answer was helpul Or if you have any additional query.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Avi

  • Internal order settlement to G/L account

    Dear All,
    User has created one internal order 650002012 and the settlement profile is created settle to G/L account S882000000. this is a cost element category "1" (Loss on contract cancellation & co).
    In the internal order The Responsible cost center is DA01D89998 (Validation & Eng Admin-St) the profit center for this "DA01".
    In the internal order the Requesting cost center is DA26ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Deltron), the profit center is "DA26"
    in the settlement profile when i double click on the settlement rule, he has assigned the Cost center DA01ZPSHRD (Shared Cost Center for Ko) and the profit center is "DA01".
    But when he execute the T.C "KO8G" the system is showing the error is " G/L account requires an assignement to CO object".
    1. The receiver G/L account has created as a cost element. is this correct?
    2. In the allocation structure do we have to select the "By cost element check box" or do we have to give the secondary cost element in the settlement cost element field.
    Please give the sugessions to solve this problem.
    Thanks and regards,
    Rao.

    It sounds like you are a little confused on how internal order settlement works.  If you want the internal order to settle to a G/L account then you must enter the G/L account number in the settlement rule in the internal order.  To do this, click on the settlement rule button in the order, select category G/L and enter the G/L account number.  In order for you to be able to select G/L as a settlement object the settlement profile you've assigned to the order must allow this.  Check the settlement profile and make sure that G/L account is listed as settlement optional or settlement required.  Also check the allocation structure that is attached to the settlement profile. In the allocation structure you must have an entry under the settlement cost element for receiver category G/L.  Here you should specify a cost element of type 22 as the settlement cost element.
    When you make those settings you will be able to specify the receiving G/L account in the internal order.  The system will then credit the internal order for the settlment amount with the credit posted on the category 22 cost element specified in the allocation structure.  The debit will appear on the G/L account you specified in the internal order's settlement rule.  Normally, the receiving G/L account would not be setup as a cost element.  if you do set it up as a cost element you will need to use an automatic account assignment setting (OKB9) to specify the cost object that it will post to.
    thanks,

  • Multiple Order Panels as JInternalFrames in one Form as a JDesktopPane

    I have a JClient application which consists of a form(JFrame) which opens a JDesktopPane. Within this desktop pane the user may open different panels(as JInternalFrames), one of them being a panel to create a new order. I want to have the ability for a user to create multiple order panels for different orders within the same desktop pane/form. The order panel consists of mainly 2 lookup views for customer and item information and 2 editable views for the order header and order details. While I can open multiple order panels, each with a unique binding container (ie. a uniquely named UIModel), within the desktop pane all of the open panels edit the same order. How can I modify my code to allow a user to create/edit multiple order instances using this order panel?

    Hi,
    did you have a look at
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/howtos/10g/jcmultiform/index.html
    the section "Data Binding in a Concurrent-Forms Use Case" describes what you are trying to achieve
    Frank

  • Error during Process order settlement

    Hi Gurus,
    i am facing problem during the process order settlement. an error is occured is as follows: Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZTAXIN.
    actually this V0 tax code is assing to the ZTAXIN procedure & which is also assign to country. i couldn't get why it ask tax code during the settlement.
    In Process order Itemization i find the 2 GL ( Element) in which there is one consumption GL & second is COFG sold GL. from GL Master i remove both GL Tax category & also remove the click from posting without tax allowed. till i am facing this problem?
    Please help me to overcome this issue.
    Point will be rewarded if question solved.
    Than'x
    Dhananjay R

    hi gopan,
    Than'x for attention on my question. till my problem is not solved. during the process order why it hit the tax code? would u please guide me how to find the tax code assignment which hit during the process order settlement?
    i have check all the Tax related setting till this issue not solved. ( Check calculation procedure (OBYG), Tax code assignment (FTXP), also check the Tax Account Integration (OB40).
    also i remove tax related assignment from the GL master related to specific gl which are display in component structure.
    pls help me to solve this issue..
    Than'x
    Dhananjay

  • Process order settlement to cost center

    Hi,
    We have a requirement to settle only the quantity to material and the costs to
    cost center from the process orders. This is to ensure the materials are
    handled as non-valuated and the COGM is computed from the goods consumption
    postings.
    The process orders will have both co products and by products as well.
    There is also one more requirement to allow Purchase orders against the non-
    valuated materials.
    I am planning to propose the following :-
    1) To make the materials valuated but set the standard price to zero to give
    the effect of non-valuated materials and at the same time can also raise
    purchase orders because otherwise non-valuated materials cannot be used to
    raise Purchase orders.
    2) When goods receipt happens from the process order the actual costs of the
    process order will remain as it is in the process order since the standard
    price of the FG is zero and only the quantity will be received into inventory.
    3) When process order settlement happens the full actual costs will be settled
    to a price difference account and cost center tied to the price difference
    account.
    Do you guys see any flaws in the above design?
    Edited by: FICO Consultant on Feb 21, 2012 4:28 AM

    Answered

  • Internal Order Settled to AUC reverse process

    Dear Gurus,
    I had a hard time to think how to do the processes over and over again.
    The current process is:
    Every month the internal order (investment and real order)  will collect the expense on AUC and settle to the AUC.
    At the end of year, the AUC will be settled to Fix Asset by internal order settlement rules.
    Now what if the settled expense was not correct. For example, in 2009, I created the IO and settled the IO to AUC in several months. But in 2010, I found the expense in IO shall not be settled to AUC, the expense was only the overheads. ( The AUC was not settled to Fix Assets). Just like I wanna reverse the settlement in 2009.
    So it would be like this in a flow chart.
    IO-> AUC->FX
    Now I need to do this:
    AUC->IO->GL
    For IO->GL, I have figured out that I can change the settlement rule profile and make the GL account allowed.
    But for AUC->IO , I have no idea and almost burn my brain on it.
    Could you please help to throw light ?
    Emma

    Hi,
    I tried 2 write offs, please help to see whether I am doing right. Thank you!
    I tried to reverse the document but it was not allowed.
    I am thinking to post a document like the following:
    1. Doc in 2009
    50 8910000000 settlement AUC             2,964,800.00-        Order:C1BIC83002
    70 3270600041 000327000032 0000    2,964,800.00
    2. What I want to post:
    40 8910000000 settlement AUC         2,964,800.00      C1BIC83002
    75 3270600041 000327000032 0000    2,964,800.00-
    But it gave me an error when I enter the asset number.
    Asset is investment measure, transaction type not allowed
    Message no. AK005
    Diagnosis
    Asset   that is to be posted is an investment measure. You are not allowed to post transactions that affect acquisition value using the current transaction.
    Procedure
    Check the asset and transaction type 160.
    I am not sure which transaction type is correct.
    Emma.

  • PM investment order settlement

    Hi Experts,
    While doing  PM Investments order settle to AUC  I am getting this error
    Settlement by cost element not possible due to secondary cost element
    Message no. KD553
    Diagnosis
    You want to settle the secondary cost element 918000 by cost element to an asset or G/L account, which is not allowed.
    Procedure
    Extend your allocation structure M1, so that secondary cost elements are not settled by cost element, but with a settlement cost element.
    can anyone me the solution
    Regards
    Sri

    Hi Piet
    Can you explain more ,
    where shall i assigned the secondary cost element  and which secondary cost element  under which category
    becasue  in this pm order also i am doing some activity planning like labour (it is one my sec.cost element)
    can you give me your suggesstion
    Thanks & Regards
    Sri

  • Internal Order settlement "Acquisition value negative"

      Hello,
    Internal Orders Settlement Process (TRX KO8G) Received the message "Acquisition Value negative in area 01" for I/O # 850100 & 861650 when attempting to run the February 2014 Settlement.
    What went wrong? How can I resolve this issue?

    Hello,
    There are 2 ways to solve this issue.
    1. Check why there is a negative value posted on this asset? If the posting is correct, then
    or
    2. Allow the negative value posting in Asset master (AS02) ->Depreciation areas-> Double click on the depreciation areas -> Negative posting.
    I suggest you to not to check the option "All values allowed", because you may loose the flexibility of negative value posting.
    Hope this helps

  • Make to order settlement

    HI
    Can gurus tell me what should be the settlement profile while using Make to order as when i am using settlement profile as SD1 which is standard then while creating Production order with respect to sales order ( CO08 ) system is giving error that "You can not make an assignment to make to order stock" but for the same order type if i am using Settlement profile as PP01 which is standard then system is behaving normal.
    But as far as my knowledge in Make to order scenario, the settlement rule should be Sales order with line item number.
    I am using strategy 20 and 25. Basically i am using Material variant concept in which when i am creating sales order, i m creating it using configurable material but as soon as i m selecting all the characteristics then system gives one pop-up and it shows the specific variant which is nothing but a configured material i.e FG. so the final sales order changed to configured material.
    This is my scenario.
    Please guide.
    Regards,
    Anand.

    Hi,
    The settlement profile assigned fororder type with standard sett profile (PP01) at OK07
    The below are the some settings related to standard profile.
    Actual cost /cost of sales = Can Be Settled
    Valid receivers
    G/L account - Settlement Not Allowed -
    Cost center Settlement -Optional
    Order - Settlement - Optional
    Material - Settlement -Optional
    Sales order Settlement -
    Optional
    Order Item Settlement -Optional
    Assign this settlement profile in requirement class of make to order strategy which u assign in the material master.
    I am not sure about it, sothat it can solve ur problem .
    Use OSS notes 432109.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Internal Order Settlement-urgent

    Hi Gurus
    I have an internal order balance of -160$ USD.
    USD is the Controlling Area Curr.
    But when viewed in local Curr (CAD) it has a balance of zero.
    I checked the controlling area settings, and it is set to update local aswell as contr. area curr.
    Please advise as how to get this internal order settled.
    I cant reverse because there are 600 more orders settled after this issue has arised.
    Please advise with TCodes
    thanks  in advance
    Sharath

    These could be orders already settled in the earlier years with some balance is USD currency. It is possible that the old version of SAP allowed the full settlement even with the balance in controlling area currency. In the version 4.7 this is not possible.
    As no new cost will likely be posted on or settled from these orders, so just lock the orders. This does not have any effect in reportings normally.

  • Order Settlement and variance booking

    I require one clarification.
    Here one production order was created with a big quantity few months ago and the same has been completed and finished in this month. Because of this the total variance which is very huge has been posted in this month in the Price Difference Account.  Because of this the profit fot the period has come down very much. 
    It seems that the above process had no errors.  I hope we cannot settle the variance in each month so that the variance will be posted in each month.  I think variance will be posted once the entire order is finished and settled, right ?  In that case to avoid this kind of situation, instead of one single order, can be create multiple orders with lesser quantity and settle it so that we need not wait for these number of months and settle the variance altogether in the period when the order is settled ?
    One more clarification.  For the already settled order, can we split the order into multiple orders again and do the above process ?

    Hi Niki
    It seems you are in DISCRETE scenario i.e. Settlement type is FUL
    With FUL - Variance calculation is dependant on Order status... ONly DLV & TECO status goes for variance calculation....
    With PER (Periodic scenario using PCC) - Variance calculation is not dependant on Order Status... You can calculate variance each month
    a. You can change the settlement type from FUL to PER in your Order Type.. Thats one solution... However, WIP will be calculated @ Target cost instead of actual cost
    b. You can also create orders for smaller qty and retain the settlement type FUL
    c. Explore with your PP guy if you can use Prod Cost Collector i.e. repetitive scenario instead of Discrete....
    d. For the already posted order - You cant split it now.. Its better you forget it now...
    br, Ajay M

  • PM order settlement to asset - but I want statistical posting to I/O????

    We use internal orders for our capital budgets - we set a plan for the year.  We do requisitions against the order which gives us our commitment.  We have workflow to upper management to release the requisiton.  Once done the req is turned into PO but at this point the account assignment is changed from F to A.  When migo and miro are done you can look at the report for the internal order and see a statistical actual posting - valuation type 11.  The actual posting capitalized the asset.  We can settle PM orders to assets - no problem - but I want to also reference the capital budget internal order in that settlment rule.  This will allow me to settle the actual costs and post to the asset but get that statistical actual amount to the internal order.  How do I do this?  I understand the hierarchy in SAP between cost center, order, and asset.  On my settlement rule for the PM order my receiver is fixed asset, but I also put the internal order number in the order field.  When I settle with KO88 the cost hits my asset but I get no statistical posting to the internal order.  Is it possible?

    It's not possbible to get a statistical posting against the I/O from PM order settlement.

  • Prodn. order settlement

    Dear Friends,
    we have done the order settlement of period April (i.e.period 1 for fiscal yr 2008) as well as May (i.e.period 2 for fiscal yr 2008).
    Now the issue is that our user has not shown the consumption of one of the raw material for FG produced in the April month and now they have done the consumption against that order with posting period of May.
    so how can I reverse the order settlement for this particular order.
    we have tried through KO88 with different permutations but it is not allowing to do the same.
    please revert for this issue as it is on priority basis.
    full points will be awarded for the relevent answers.
    Regrads
    Amitabh

    Hi Amit,
    You have to cascade the reversals; first reverse May then you can reverse April. I checked out the ERP financials forum and if you search for the 'settlement reverse'  thread there, you will find details.
    Warm Regards,
    Sreekant.

  • Budgets Reset For Order To Order Settlements

    Hi,
    I have budget set for a Plant Maintenance Order. When I settle the activities (Goods Receipts) on for the PM Work Order to an Internal Order the budget is reset which allows the user to apply more commitments to the PM Order. Therefore the settlement allows the budget to be exceeded. How do I prevent the settlement from allowing the budget to be overspent?

    Hi ,
    I am not sure about budget reset : If you are controlling PM budgeting  thru internal orders then check config under :
    SPRO--->Controlling ->Internal Orders->Budget and Availability Control --->Define Tolerance Limit for Availibility Control
    Here you can define usage or Abs.Variance values as per your requirement .If you are making any config changes here ensure no posting are done at that time ..
    regards
    pushpa

Maybe you are looking for