Multiple pack level hierarchies

Hi,
i want to use multiple hierarchies with fixed device controllers created by the parameter value (hierarchy_by_epc_filter) of the activity device_validate_40 in the rule pack.
Is it possible to build multiple hierarchies, considering the scenario described above?
For sending and receiving messages I use the Auto ID Test Tool.
Thanks,
Alex

Hi Alexander,
Yes its possible to build pack hierarchy.
To build packing hierarchy you need to first assign pack levels to filter values under pack settings in IMG.
This pack level determines which object (such as an item or a case) can be packed within another object (such as a case or pallet).

Similar Messages

  • Multiple Value Based hierarchies per MOLAP dimension

    Hi,
    a) Is it possible to have multiple value based heirarchies in a single MOLAP dimension in OWB and deployed to analytical workspace ?
    Are there any pitfalls, that we need to be aware of...
    b) Can we have a mix of Value and level based heirarchies per dimension ?
    Thanks in advance,
    Chakri

    Hi Chakri
    Yes, you can have multiple value based hierarchies and also a mix of value/level based.
    Cheers
    David

  • Do BI Beans support ragged or skip-level hierarchies

    Do BI Beans support ragged or skip-level hierarchies ?

    Hi Alexander.
    Well I am also a positive person ;)
    Here it goes....
    In the guide page 93/412
    Oracle® OLAP
    Application Developer’s Guide
    Release 9.2.0.4.1
    Part No. B10333-01
    "Dimension Tables with Complex Hierarchies
    If your source data is a star or snowflake schema, but the dimension tables include
    any of the following variations, then use the CWM2 APIs:
    -> Level columns containing NULLs, such as skip-level hierarchies
    -> Multiple hierarchies with different base levels (sometimes called ragged
    hierarchies)
    -> Multiple hierarchies with values mapped to different levels
    -> Parent-child dimensions
    Choosing a Tool for Creating OLAP Catalog Metadata
    If your schema contains parent-child dimension tables, then you must convert them
    to level-based dimension tables. The CWM2 write APIs include a package for this
    transformation."
    You can use the next three steps to add different levels and do the mappings you want!
    CWM2:
    execute cwm2_olap_level.add_level_to_hierarchy
    execute cwm2_olap_table_map.Map_DimTbl_HierLevel
    execute cwm2_olap_table_map.Map_DimTbl_HierLevelAttr
    Best regards.
    Odds

  • Error 15037: Table has multiple key level associations

    Oracle BI 11g.
    I get this error when doing a consistency check with the BI Admin tool:
    Table DIMCPN has multiple key level associations: [DIMCPN.CPNKEY] and [DIMCPN.CPNKEY]
    I've seen the notes in the following thread:
    Re: nQSerror 15037
    However, these don't help.
    I'm not doing anything complicated.
    All I've done is to create the Physical model by importing some dimension and fact tables, then create the Business layer object by dragging across from the physical layer, then create the Presentation layer object by dragging across from the Business layer.
    I've not done anything else at all. I.e. I've not renamed any columns, created any hierarchies, etc, etc.
    Any ideas what's happening?

    "can you check the keys foreign keys for those table "
    You didn't mention what I should be checking for.
    However, I think I've worked it out now.
    I have a dimension table that is referenced by both other dimension tables and the fact tables. Therefore, when imported into BI, both the dimension tables and the fact tables have foreign keys to this common dimension table.
    I'm guessing that the foreign keys on the dimension tables are not required - because there are foreign key references from the fact tables to the common table anyway. Bearing in mind that this is a star schema and not a snowflake schema.
    => I deleted all the foreign keys from all my dimension tables, and now the consistency check works ok.

  • Getting Error - Dimension has multiple leaf levels which are not identical

    Hi All,
    While creating two hierarchies with in same dimension , i am getting error like - Dimension has multiple leaf levels which are not identical.
    Does this error mean , the number of levels in both hierarchies should be same or it has some thing else meaning.
    I was creating hierarchies like below -
    LE details
    - LRU Details
    - LRU's Registration Details
    - LE's Registration Details
    How should i create the hierarchy?
    Thanks ,Ashish

    Hi... Ashish
    Look at this... http://oraclebizint.wordpress.com/2007/11/30/oracle-bi-ee-101332-one-dimension-multiple-hierarchies/
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore Guggilla

  • Can I have multiple volume levels in one track?

    I have a track composed of audio from a cassette recorder of a now deceased relative's voice.
    Since the cassette was turned on and off during recording, the recordings are at different volumes.
    I have been able to import the cassette into a GarageBand project, and delete dead space, but now I find that the volume is not consistent.
    Any way to remedy that? I am wondering if I need to chop it up and make more than one track, and adjust the volume on each track? Will this work as long as the tracks don't overlap?
    And then do I send the finished product to iTunes in order to be able to use it in an iMovie?
    Or can I drag it right from GarageBand to iMovie?
    Many thanks, I'm a very new GarageBand user.

    JGolomb wrote:
    Can I have multiple volume levels in one track?.
    search GB's help for "curve"
    And then do I send the finished product to iTunes in order to be able to use it in an iMovie?
    "Share" it to disc
    can I drag it right from GarageBand to iMovie?
    no

  • SAP R/3  4.6 B Support pack level for AIX 5.2

    Hi,
    We have upgraded O.S version from AIX 4.3 to AIX 5.2. Here our environment is SAP R/3 4.6B and DB oracle 8.1.7.
    My question: Do we apply any support pack to the system after support pack upgrade. Please find the below support pack level for our current system.
    SAP_BASIS      46B           0054    SAPKB46B54
    SAP_ABA         46B           0054    SAPKA46B54
    SAP_APPL       46B           0054    SAPKH46B54
    SAP_HR           46B           0000        -
    ST-PI            2005_1_46B    0003    SAPKITLQC3
    Please request the feedback.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Narayana Murthy.

    Do we apply any support pack to the system after O.S upgrade ?
    ( Correction for the below posted mail)

  • Multiple key level associations

    Hi,
    I am getting the below error during the consistency check.
    Table, X, has multiple key level associations.
    Can anyone please let me know the reason for the same.
    Also, when I drag the physical tables from the physical layer to the BMM Layer, there are some default primary keys in the Logical Table.What considerations does OBIEE take into when deciding upon the Primary Key in the Logical table.
    Thanks in Advance
    Akshatha

    "can you check the keys foreign keys for those table "
    You didn't mention what I should be checking for.
    However, I think I've worked it out now.
    I have a dimension table that is referenced by both other dimension tables and the fact tables. Therefore, when imported into BI, both the dimension tables and the fact tables have foreign keys to this common dimension table.
    I'm guessing that the foreign keys on the dimension tables are not required - because there are foreign key references from the fact tables to the common table anyway. Bearing in mind that this is a star schema and not a snowflake schema.
    => I deleted all the foreign keys from all my dimension tables, and now the consistency check works ok.

  • OLAP on 11g and Materialised Views with Multiple Value-Based Hierarchies

    Hello OLAPians
    I am trying to setup Orable BIEE to report on an OLAP cube with pre-aggregated data. As OBIEE is not able to hook into the OLAP directly i have to create an SQL cubeview.
    Currently i am on a 10g OLAP environment and am using the oracle sample SQL cubeview generator to create an SQLview of my cube.
    The cube itself has multiple dimensions and these dimensions have multiple VALUE-based (ragged) hierarchies and dimension members can be shared across hierarchies also.
    Initially i had a problem running the view generator plugin because there is a bug within it that does not finish if there are multiple value-based hierarchies present. I was able to get around this by manually editing the limitmap for the cubeview and manually creating the SQL view.
    The question that i want to ask is how robust is the 11g materialised views with multiple value-based hierarchies and the sharing of dimension members across different hierarchies?
    Has anyone successfully been able to create a cubeview and import it into OBIEE without the hassle of manually editing the limitmap?
    A problem arises with the value-based setup whereby if the client creates a newer depth in the ragged hierarchy, i need to manually create the limitmap and the cube-view over again, and then re-map the BI Administration mappings.

    The simple answer to your question,
    how robust is the 11g materialised views with multiple value-based hierarchies...?is that materialized views are not supported on top of value-based hierarchies in 11g. The reason is that it is not possible to write a reasonable SQL statement that aggregates a fact over a value-based hierarchy. Such a SQL statement is necessary if we want to create a rewritable MV on top of the cube.
    But I suspect this is not what you are really asking. If you are trying to set up OBIEE on top of the cube in 10g using the view generator, then you will probably want to use the "ET VIEWS" that are generated automatically in 11g. These are generated whether or not you enable materialized views on top of your cube. I am not aware of any issues with the generated value-based hierarchy view support in 11g. Members may be shared between value hierarchies and you will not need to generate or modify limit maps.

  • Support Pack Level Upgrade in BI 7.0

    Hi all,
    Can anyone let me know what are the possible issues that would occur after upgrading support pack level in BI 7.0.
    As far as I know a BI consultant would participate in the upgrade activities like BI objects check, SPAU, query check, etc. Can anyone let me know if there are are any other activities to be performed.
    I would appreciate your help.
    Thanks,
    Sunny.

    Hi
    There is any customer specific development done by SAP in the previous system. If so, the time to act is just after the pre upgrade study only. The customer would only want to retain the customer specific module developed by SAP. We need to get SAPu2019s intervention in the project before we start the upgrade. SAP would develop certain patches to be run on the previous system  to capture all the customer specific development and then they would run some patches on ECC system u2013 this would release the customer specific development in the new system (ECC./BI). This is a very crucial and important check of the step. If not taken care of at the proper time, it might hamper the Customer Specific development on the new system.
    It is to be assured that the new system is at the latest stack level for ABAP, XI, BI etc before we start the SPDD and SPAU phase
    Only one request is to be made for SPDD. For SPAU too, only one request should be made.
    Previous system sandbox  should be available for reference during the entire upgrade project and should not be scrapped before the Go Live.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0c9c8be-346f-2a10-2081-cd99177c1fb9
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/304b9de6-f84f-2b10-94af-e5ff7461c18c
    http://www.thespot4sap.com/upgrade_guide_v2.pdf
    Hope it helps.

  • Suggested Support Pack Level for ECC 6.0 Upgrade - Target

    Hi ,
    Can someone give us the suggested support pack level for the ECC 6.0 system after the upgrade.
    Our current patch level is:
    SAP_ABA     700     0012     SAPKA70012
    SAP_BASIS     700     0012     SAPKB70012
    PI_BASIS     2005_1_700     0012     SAPKIPYJ7C
    ST-PI     2005_1_700     0003     SAPKITLQI3
    SAP_BW     700     0014     SAPKW70014
    SAP_AP     700     0009     SAPKNA7009
    SAP_APPL     600     0010     SAPKH60010
    SAP_HR     600     0013     SAPKE60013
    EA-IPPE     400     0008     SAPKGPID08
    EA-APPL     600     0008     SAPKGPAD08
    EA-DFPS     600     0008     SAPKGPDD08
    EA-FINSERV     600     0008     SAPKGPFD08
    EA-GLTRADE     600     0008     SAPKGPGD08
    EA-HR     600     0013     SAPKGPHD13
    EA-PS     600     0008     SAPKGPPD08
    EA-RETAIL     600     0008     SAPKGPRD08
    FINBASIS     600     0008     SAPK-60008INFINBASIS
    ECC-DIMP     600     0008     SAPK-60008INECCDIMP
    ERECRUIT     600     0008     SAPK-60008INERECRUIT
    FI-CA     600     0008     SAPK-60008INFICA
    FI-CAX     600     0008     SAPK-60008INFICAX
    INSURANCE     600     0008     SAPK-60008ININSURANC
    IS-CWM     600     0008     SAPK-60008INISCWM
    IS-H     600     0008     SAPK-60008INISH
    IS-M     600     0008     SAPK-60008INISM
    SEM-BW     600     0008     SAPKGS6008
    IS-OIL     600     0008     SAPK-60008INISOIL
    IS-PS-CA     600     0008     SAPK-60008INISPSCA
    IS-UT     600     0008     SAPK-60008INISUT
    LSOFE     600     0008     SAPK-60008INLSOFE
    IRMIPM     30B     0005     SAPK-30BI7INIRM
    IRMGLB     30B     0005     SAPK-30BG7INIRM
    ST-A/PI     01K_ECC600     0000     -
    GSCDMC     600     0001     SAPK-60001INGSCDMC
    RCMGT     601     0001     SAPK-60101INRCMGT
    Thanks
    Senthil

    Hi Senthil,
    of course it is always recommended to use the newest Support Package Stack,
    but if your system (your business processes) are working fine, I would recommend you to
    import support package only then when you have an error or you want to have a special fiunctionality.
    Some customers play support packages into the system only twice a year, because the business processes
    should be tested after the sp import.
    Kind regards
    Imre Takácsi-Nagy
    Senior Support Consultant II.
    SAP Global Support Center Austria
    Netweaver WEB Application Server ABAP / JAVA

  • SAP ECC 6.0 service pack level upgrade from 15 to 18 impact on SAP SRM 5.0

    Hi All,
    What all needs to be tested in SAP SRM when we upgrade SAP ECC6.0 service pack level from 15 to a8.
    I am already facing issue in BBPGET VD  and HR Interface with SAP SRM.Workflow issue while testing in EBQ.
    Kindly let me know is anythings needs to be tested.
    Regards
    Vivek.

    Hello,
    There are no known issues related to ECC 6.0 support package upgrade when this system is integrated with SRM 5.0.
    Since SRM 5.0 is fully supported with ECC 6.0.
    Regards,
    Ricardo

  • Support Pack level for R/3 4.7 and BW 3.5 with SAP CRM2007

    What should be the Support Pack level for R/3 4.7 and BW 3.5 with SAP CRM2007?
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka

    >
    Rajesh Banka wrote:
    > What should be the Support Pack level for R/3 4.7 and BW 3.5 with SAP CRM2007?
    >
    > Regards,
    > Rajesh Banka
    Hi Rajesh,
    Please see the note '833438', it explains which pack is required in this scenario.
    "You cannont connect ERP (R/3) releases lower than 4.6C to CRM 5.0.
    All subsequent CRM releases (5.0 or higher) cannot be connected to ERP lower
    than (R/3) 4.6C.
    These types of system landscapes are not supported by SAP.
    If you are using CRM 5.0, you must have implemented Plug-in PI 2004.1
    Support Package 10 and, provided you have Basis Release 620 or higher, you
    must import PI_BASIS 2005.1 in R/3. --> After you have imported these
    plug-ins"
    Thanks,
    Nitin Sharma

  • Value based hierarchies, Skip Level Hierarchies

    Hello,
    I need to create hierarchy based on column value , Please give me some details on implementing value based hierarchies and skip level hierarchies in obiee 10.1.3.
    Thank you

    With 10.3 i do not think we have a inbuilt solution to build value based hierarchies, you have to flatten the hierarchy and build a level based hierarchy.
    OBIEE 11g has value based hierarchies feature.
    refer this one for 11g.
    http://sandybi.wordpress.com/2010/08/17/hierarchies-in-obiee-11g-part-1/
    - Madan
    Edited by: Madan Thota on Sep 14, 2010 11:15 AM

  • Problem with skip-level hierarchies

    Hi,
    I have created metadata using CWM2 procedures. These procedures allow define skip-level or ragged hierarchies.
    I created skip-level hierarchies by setting null values to several keys in dimension table.
    The result is... OLAP did not created cursor error, when I try to drill that hiuerarchy?
    Why?
    How to build BIBeans compatible skip-level hierarchies and?
    My next question: Is it possible to use BIBeans with fact tables which contain embedded totals?
    Slawek.

    Hello Vicky,
    Products created in R/3 can always be downloaded to CRM using the download object MATERIAL.
    But products created in CRM could not be recovered back unless you archive them in CRM.
    In order to delete the materials in CRM , you can use report COM_PRODUCT_DELETE_SINGLE or COM_PRODUCT_DELETE_ALL.
    You can then download these materials from R/3.
    Or you can have your own Z-report using the above standard report, where you can pass on the material id or range.
    Also,please note that before executing these reports, you need to make an entry in table COMC_PR_TOOL_REG.
    Hope this helps!
    Best Regards,
    Shanthala Kudva.

Maybe you are looking for