Multiple printers on the same network problem

I have 2 HP OJ Pro 8600 printers and one HP OJ Pro 8500 Plus printer on the same network. My question is whether it is possible to change the network name of these printers so that it is easier to identify them.
The printers are in three different buildings so there is little stress to run around to find out where the print comes.

Hi JObbern
If all the printers are on the same network you won't be able to change the network name on the printer.
You can change the name of the printer though on each computer. Depending on the operating system you are using, go to the printers window, right click and rename. Example Office1, Office 2.
If the option isn't available you can go to the printer window and add a printer and change the printer name through the wizard.
Hope that helps.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Gemini02
I work on behalf of HP

Similar Messages

Airplay from Multiple Sources on the Same Network

Hi,
I have a question that I was hoping someone could answer. I recently upgraded to iTunes 11 and bought a B&W A7 Airplay system. It works fine (bar the odd drop out). My question is, if I buy another A7 for another room and someone else in my house on the same network wants to airplay music from thier iOS device to that speaker whilst I am using iTunes to play music through the speaker in my room will that cause a problem?
In other words, can you have 2 different speakers recieving an airplay stream from 2 different devices?
Thanks in advance.

Hi JObbern
If all the printers are on the same network you won't be able to change the network name on the printer.
You can change the name of the printer though on each computer. Depending on the operating system you are using, go to the printers window, right click and rename. Example Office1, Office 2.
If the option isn't available you can go to the printer window and add a printer and change the printer name through the wizard.
Hope that helps.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Gemini02
I work on behalf of HP

Multiple Users Mounting the Same Network Share?

Hello, first time posting...
I'll cut right to my main question: Is it possible, on OS X v10.3.9, for multiple users to simultaneously connect to the same network share?
Here in my office, we have a single Mac that is used by multiple people throughout the day. It has two accounts on it, 'Communications' and 'Studio'. 'Communications' is an Admin account that is used by a co-worker who spends the most time on the Mac. He created the no-limitation 'Studio' account for the rest of us to use.
There is a certain Windows network share that we both frequently use. We've found that if one user connects to the share first, the other user will not have access to it; using 'Go -> Connect to Server' will result in the share being greyed out in the list, and the share will not show up in the Finder.
However, there is one way around it. If Studio connects to the share first and then Communications (the admin account) attempts to make a connection of it's own *through a shortcut on the dock*, then a 'clone' of the share will be created on Comm's desktop, with a "-1" after the name (though it might be some other number).
This may sound like I've answered my own question, but what I'm looking for is a way for the non-Admin account to access the share after the Admin account already has (so that we don't have to log-in and disconnect Communications everytime Studio needs to manage files on the share).
We have Thursby Software's DAVE installed on the Mac, but I'm not sure how it fits into all this.
Any thoughts, suggestions or advice?
Thanks.

Bizarre. It turned out I could merge them, but only in to the mapped drive - L: - and only by explicitly clicking on the drive icon - if I typed L:\series in to dialog box it converted it back to \\nas\share\series... Not helpful.

WLC-2106 and multiple interfaces on the same network

Hi there,
I recently created a TAC request to the Cisco support regarding our WLC-2106, but they could not help me. Basically I just learned that you can create new interfaces for the wireless LAN controller and then dedicate them to a given wireless network (SSID). This way I could more effectively utilize network bandwidth also. Problem is that all of the interfaces have to be in a different network segment in order to work, which is not what I want. I specifically want to have several interfaces on the same network segment.
Has anyone tried to accomplish the same?

Basically what I've misunderstood is that all the traffic generated by our wireless clients have been going through the single 100Mbit/s ethernet port on the wireless LAN controller (management interface), and to mitigate this I thought I could create new interfaces (ports) and dedicate those to given WLAN networks.. I see now that this is not supported. Not inside the same network at least.
So, by reading further and consulting my best friend Google I learned about a setting called "AP Mode". Changing that from Local (the default) to H-REAP the APs should not route their traffic anymore through the management interface on the wireless controller, but instead route all the client traffic directly to the local LAN. This way you effectively remove the 100Mbit/s bottle-neck when all the APs were using the management interface both for configuration and client data traffic.
It seems you also have to enable H-REAP Local switching from a given WLAN network in addition to changing the AP Mode of your access points to H-REAP. I'm still in the testing phase here so should anyone have any insight to this, I'd be greatful to hear more.

How do I merge multiple instances of the same network share?

In my (large) Lightroom 5.2 (Windows) library I have three instances of, essentially, the same network share (a Drobo NAS) which appear separately in the library.
One appears as Share (\\nas) L:, one as \\nas\Share and one as \\nas\share. The contents of the share are spread randomly across the three - so one might contain the folders series\event1, series\event4 and series\event5 and another series\event2, series\event3 and series\event6.
Is there an easy way to convince Lightroom that they're all the same physical location and merge them in the library? No amount of dragging, dropping, importing or synchronization seems to have had any effect so far!
Guy

Bizarre. It turned out I could merge them, but only in to the mapped drive - L: - and only by explicitly clicking on the drive icon - if I typed L:\series in to dialog box it converted it back to \\nas\share\series... Not helpful.

Multiple same-manuf/model AirPrint printers on the same network

Our business uses the same Make/Model of an AirPrint-compatible printer (HP LaserJet PW1102w) at several separate workstations (3) on the same WiFi network. AirPrint works perfectly from an iOS device to any of the printers, unfortunately, all 3 printers show up with the same name in AirPrint when you go to select a printer. Is there any way to distinguish the different printers from each other when you go to choose a printer in AirPrint? All workstations use Windows 7; I tried simply renaming each printer in the Printer Properties of "Devices and Printers" in the Control Panel, giving each a workstation name to identify them. This does not work; AirPrint seems to only show the actual model name given to it by the manufacturer, which I have not been able to find a way to change. Can anyone help with this? It is a rather frustrating guessing game at choosing a printer out of the same printer names, only to have your print job show up at someone else's workstation.

Hello nabqtchamps,
If you can acquire the IP address of each printer, please post again if you cannot, and input the IP address of your printer into the address bar of an internet browser and hit "Enter". This should take you to the printer's Embedded Web Server.
1. Click the "Network" tap on the top of the page.
2. Click the "Network Identification" option on the left-hand side.
3. You should now see an option for "Bonjour Service Name", that is the name that appears for AirPrint from your iOS devices.
4. Change the name as you see fit and click "Apply".
Please let me know if you need any further assistance.
*I work for HP*

Multiple Computers on the same network

We're currently transitioning to Windows 8.1 MRD after many years running OSX and ARD in our small office.
We have two computers that we need to access independently from the outside. We opened up the recommend port for MRD and have it working as expected on a single computer. However, we can only gain access to a single machine from the outside. With Apple Remote
Desktop, you simply open up additional ports to allow access for multiple machines. Super easy. We decided to do the same with MRD, but failed with everything we attempted.
Does MRD not support using custom ports for multiple computers?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
We can achieve the result as you want with remote desktop connection. We need to allow the port from firewall end and can apply particular rules with advanced option for specific ports. Also if you are using Routers then need to open the port from router end,
and finally when connecting user “servername:portnumber” and provide credentials.
Please checkthis article for more details.
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
TechNet Community Support

Multiple user on the same Network

hi,
I am working on network, i would like to setup a network schema which can be accessed by multi user, each user should work on particular portion of network, without disturbing others.
How can i set up this kind of architecture,
whether one network can be partition for multi-user or any other alternative is there...
Rams

tastyrico wrote:
Hi Drew,
Thanks for the recommendations. They are useful tips to have in the arsenal, thanks. However, the preferences discussed are intended for directly attached external hard disks and the specific discussion was to make it available to the network on a Mac that is powered up with no user logged in (like a OS X Server but user still need to log in).
That's correct, I'm sorry I am wrong.
I do remember another defaults write option for detaching network drives on 'switch to loginwindow' because I needed the same thing - eventually I gave up & disabled fast user switching, it reduced the amount of issues for the clients. Sorry for confusing the two.
Have you considered mounting it via a startup script. At the moment it is failing because the path exists when User2 mounts it. If you try a script (at the level of the system) it should mount only once. Obviously sticking usernames & passwords into a script is not the best for security.
I think this issue is what NFS mounts can overcome, but I haven't used them for so long. They should be able to mount with no user interaction, but they are less flexible with permissions IIRC.
If your NAS supports NFS look at that, I think you both need to remove the user as the agent that mounts the disk. If the OS does it once (& permissions are correct) it should remove the 'diskname-1' issue.
When it works you end up with volumes in /Network/diskname.
I don't have a good place to start with NFS, so take a look around here…
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4144999
@ElisabethBraut, do you get this error form MS…
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2712085
MS apps fall apart when you have disks mounted like this, it's a consequence of MS apps using an older way to represent filepaths.

Multiple gateway on the same network with VPN

Dear all,
i have problem of multiple gateway with VPN, please refer to the attached pics:
PC B cannot ping PC A if PC A's gateway is not pointing to the VPN Router
if i change the PC A default gateway to 192.168.1.2 ( VPN router) , then PC B can ping it. but the fact is we have to keep the default gateway stick to 192.168.1.1 . is the any way to make it happen ?
Thx

Hi,
Can you add static route on Linksys router 'ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.2' and give a try..?
hth
MS
**Rate helpful posts**

How to set up multiple computers on the same network

I have a small network with 4 computers on it. Two of these I would like to be able to access from outside of the office using Remote Desktop. Before I had this set up working just fine with only one computer, but have recently started sharing my office space with another person. Their I.T. guy set up their own connections and rerouted the default ports to their computer instead of mine. My router is a Netgear WNDR3700. Computer 1 is using the default port being forwarded to it's I.P. I moved the ports up by one number for the other computer and have it forwarding to it's IP. For example, 3389 on Comp. 1 is 3390 on Comp 2.
Now what I can't make happen is this connection to work when I try it. So I'm just wondering if there is a way that I can do this?

you would need to setup a VPN and tunnel into your office.
FYI..the default ports are 3283 and 5900.

Multiple Apple TVs on the same network

I teach at a school and have used an Apple TV in conjunction with my iPad for presentations. I find it invaluable. Other teachers at my school would like to do the same, but I'm told by our tech support that multiple Apple TVs on the same network cause problems. When I ask them what problems, they aren't sure. They just tell me that other school have experienced problems. Other than a wifi bandwidth problem, I can't imagine what kind of problem it would be. A collegue of mine wants to jump onboard but desn't want to make waves. Does anyone know of any problems?

I have two Apple TV's, one in the living room and one in the bedroom... however, the living room is the only one that my iphone Remote APP is connecting with... I've named/tagged the two ATV's hoping that the Remote APP would provide me the option on which one to control, but it doesn't....
I've confirmed that home sharing is "on" with in all devices "settings"...
Any suggestions?

Solaris 8: Multiple primary interfaces connected to the same network

I have a machine with Solaris 8, and it has multiple interfaces that are connected to the same network which means they all have metric 0 (1 hop) to the default gateway.
assume:
e1000g0: 192.168.30.70
e1000g2: 192.168.30.72
e1000g4: 192.168.30.74
e1000g5: 192.168.30.76
gateway: 192.168.30.65 (Cisco Router)
However, it seems like despite the fact that they have a direct connection, they seem to be using e1000g0 to access the 192.168.30.0 network to get to the default gateway and then to anywhere else.
When I send a ping to say, 192.168.30.74 (IP of e1000g4) and capture packets on e1000g0, I see the "echo reply" messages going out of it as opposed to e1000g4 even though e1000g4 is the one receiving the "echo request". This should not happen and these should be completely independent as they should all be advertising a 1 hop to that network
The outputs from netstat -rn and ifconfig -a are shown in the picture on the link below
[http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/7308/ifconfignetstathiddenip.jpg]
This gets even more confusing when I go into the Cisco router and run the command: "show mac address-table" where only the MAC address of e1000g0 is shown for the switch port it's connected to, but not for the other interfaces which are connected to the switch. Yes, all ports are active (no shut) and are pingable.
Also, the odd thing is that ALL of these individual MACs show up in the router ARP table when the machine comes up, however after sending a ping to one of them, after a certain expiry or whatever period, the MACs disappear from the router ARP table and only the MAC for e1000g0 shows up. The arp table of the solaris machine however shows all the relevant MACs of each port of the router that it's physically connected to (This is actually a Cisco Switch with the advanced IP services imagine and L3 routing turned on)
Before anyone asks: The setting local-mac-address? setting does NOT exist in my machine and it never has, but it used to work fine. Also, from the ifconfig command, once can tell that all the MAC addresses are fine.
I need to somehow assign all these interfaces equal priority and make them understand that they're physically connected to the 192.168.30.0 network and there's no need to go through e1000g0 to get to it.
This is causing a lot of problems as eventually all traffic will end up going through the e1000g0 interface and that will become a bottle neck.
Please help Thanks in advance

Ok thanks. That was a useful response.
I did think about the trunking software that is claimed to be available for Solaris 8, but it's only available if you've got paid support contract. Oracle came and ruined everything re: Sun support which is so expensive now.
The other confusion is, we never had that OR needed to configure trunking/link aggregation on this machine, so why now?
Lastly, by your explanation, this should be expected and is "normal" behaviour, which would mean that this machine was always doing this and I only just noticed it this time? I thought if you turn off ipv4 forwarding and router function in the machine, it's every interface for itself. But it's not doing that :(
So then the question is, Can I force it? I've tried a bunch of things by manipulating the tables and it seems to mess things up where nothing is getting through or it now shifts all the traffic to some other port make the problem no different
Is there a way to give equal weight to all interfaces for the traffic to go directly through them that is originating at those ports?

HT4356 All my devices except my iPhone 4S can airprint. Only the 4s tells me no airprint printers found. I see no changes in the settings and I am on the same network.

All my devices except my iPhone 4S can airprint. Only the 4s tells me no airprint printers found. I see no differences in the settings and I am on the same network as the printer. Like I said, two iPads and an iPhone 4 airprint like a champ!

Appreciate the suggestion and tried it, but still, no joy. I even had another iPhone brought into the network and it found the printer, no problem. It's just this one iPhone 4s. Sounds like a trip to the Genius Bar for me!

Can I use multiple sa-ns500 on the same network?

Is it possible to use multiple sa-ns500 speakers on the same network? they seem to want to have the same name on the network and therefore only 1 will connect at a time? Can I rename one somehow? Thanks!

Hello Brian,
Welcome to Sony Community.
Please check for the Secure Link option in the Home Theater System or A/V Receiver. This will help isolate the connection to the different Network speakers.
Yes, you can use multiple Network speakers on the same home network.
You can change the Device name using the Setting screen on the browser.
Follow the steps mentioned on the page # 34 and 35 of the User’s manual to start up the browser of the Network speakers and change the Device name.
If my post answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution."

What's the problem with having multiple users with the same UID?

I've got three edit systems connected to the SAN using open directory off our server.
I want all edit systems to have read/write access to everything created. I don't need to protect anything from any of the systems. With all three systems logged on using the same user, I never have to change permissions.
The other cool thing about this is that Final Cut Pro will let me know if someone else is modifying a project that I have open with the warning:
“The project "projectName" has been modified externally. If another user is working on it, saving will overwrite their changes. Do you still want to save?”
This sounds great, right?
RED FLAG!!!! Apple gives the warning in this article:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=302450
"You should not allow two users with the same UID to access an Xsan volume at the same time."
So why is it bad to have two (or more) users with the same UID?
I can see that in some situations it means that you can't prevent people from read/write privileges. But I don't want to restrict privileges.
What am I missing? With all of these warnings, it seems like if I do this my edit systems could all explode or something. Please help me understand the potential ramifications of having three users have the same UID.

Hi Russell,
1) If you have OD set up and "editor" has UID 1111, then when they log in to any machine that's bound to OD as editor, they will get UID 1111. Therefore, there won't be any of these permission errors. This is typically the recommended approach.
2) I assume you mean "You'd prefer to not using open directory?" Whatever the case, OD isn't mandatory with Xsan -- it's just that with multiple user accounts, managing them centrally tends to be easier. For 3 or 4 accounts and 3 or 4 machines maybe it's no big deal. If you go larger, it could get a lot more complicated. That said, if you set it up such that each machine has the exact same set of users (as you said, Mary = UID 502, Fred = UID 503, William = UID 504), then you can do what you want. Mary can log in from multiple machines at the same time, and in general you won't have permissions problems. Of course, if you try and read and write the same file from multiple workstations at the same time, you will get file locking issues, which will prohibit somebody from successfully writing the file.
File locking issues are different from general permissions errors. The former basically says "hey, someone else is editing this file. Therefore I won't let you edit it right now... you can read it if you want though." Permissions means somebody saves it, and Xsan thinks you saved it and own the file, when you really don't.
Quad-Core PMG5, 4 GB RAM, 7800 GT, 1 TB disk. Mac OS X (10.4.4)

Multiple printers on the same network problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for