Multiple Receiver Dtermination from Same Business Sender Service to RecvStp

Hi,
I was trying to implement FORK STEP in ccBPM. Scenario I'm trying to implement is, using fork bundle PO with same items together.
Can anybody help me to create multiple receiver dterminations for three receiver steps in three branches of fork step, where a common business sender service and same Integration process is used for receiving messages into SAP XI.
Please advice soon,
Thank You,

Hi Murali,
If it's always the same message, only one receiver determination is necessary. I'd also rather tend to do the capturing within a loop which is executed three times.
Best regards
Joachim

Similar Messages

I am using i pad mini. I am going through a issue in which i am not able to send mails to my work email add wherein i am able to receive emails from same email id.

i am using i pad mini. I am going through a issue in which i am not able to send mails to my work email add wherein i am able to receive emails from same email id.

With one mailbox server in the production site and one in the DR site, you do not have high availability. If the main site goes down, the cluster loses quorum and all databases dismount. You must then force quorum or move the file share
witness to restore quorum.
I can't tell you why what you observed happened. At the time of the problem I would have been looking at the transport queues to see what's queued and to where.
I recommend you look at the configuration of your send connectors to ensure that none of them are dependent upon the DR site server.
To send mail outside, you must allow relay. To do this, I recommend you create a new receive connector that's configured to allow relay and restrict access to the application server to keep anyone else from using it to relay. There are plenty
of articles on the Internet that describe how to configure a relay connector.
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

How to call multiple stored procedure from same DB Adapter

Hi,
I want to invoke 3 stored procedures from my message flow in BUS . I created a DB adapter and invoked 1 successfully . Now I don't to configure 2 other DB adapters for calling other 2 stored procedures . I want some how to be able to call the other 2 from the first DB adapter only . Somehow I need the flexibility to have procedure names as the operation names in 1 wsdl and be able to configure this in JDeveloper for this at time of DB adapter configuration . I am using 11G . Is it possible ?

You can probably create a DB adapter with operation type selected as Execute Pure SQL and write SQL code to invoke the stored procedures depending on the procedure name (which you can get as one of the parameters of DB Adapter).
However, Even if you were able to do it, the DB Adapter schemas are generated based on stored procedure parameter list and types. If you use Execute Pure SQL type of DB Adapter the schema will be generated based on the parameters which you are using in your custom SQL code within DB Adapter. Which means that if you want to add a new stored procedure as target which has a different name and different parameters then you will need to regenerate the DB adapter and update your custom SQL code. This also means that you will need to do regression testing interfaces to all stored procedures whenever there is any change in this DBAdapter.
Now, my question is why do you want to invoke multiple stored procedures from same DB adapter?
This is not a good way to design integration solutions and makes your services resistance to change as it will take more time to change and test.
If all that you want is to have a web service which can have different operations for different stored procedures then you should create three business services and create a wrapper proxy service which has one operation for each stored procedure, within the proxy transform and call the correct backend service (you can use operational branch). This way you have a modular code where each module (read interface to one stored procedure) can be independently modified and tested.

Display Several Sales Orders from Same Business Customer TOGETHER in MD04

Hello
In MD04 is it possible to display several sales orders from same business customer together?
For instance one business customer order bikes for two times.
The Order-No are 12912(50st by 07/08/09) and 12913(100st by 10/08/09).
Normally after runnning of MRP(MD02), the planned orders are displayed seperately in MD04.
I want to display two orders together.
The reason is if some trouble happens in Production(for Ord-no 12912) and it cannot be deliveried on schedule, however Production (for Ord-no 12913) is going without trouble, the final-products for order 12913 should move for 12912.
If you have some good solutions, please share it.
Thank you for your advice.
Regards,

Hi Riyolshibashi,
Lets look at the two main scenarios, MTS and MTO.
In MTS, the general display filters are available in MD04. Standard SAP filters do not filter on 'customer'. I suspect this is because the concept would normally be illogical in a MTS environment. Planned orders do not exist to serve a customer, but to serve 'stock'. But let us not think about SAP and their logic.
SAP allows you to create customized filters, in IMG>Production>MRP>Evaluation>Filter>Define Display filter. Within this definition, under the "Addnl Selections' tab, you can tick 'Define addl selections in the transaction'. When you use this filter in MD04 display, then, one of the options available to you is to enter a specific Customer number, and then the display will only show the requirements from this customer. Since you have excluded all other customer's orders, all orders of a single customer will be displayed consecutively. Next to each other.
In the case of MTO, the 'filter-by-customer' concept makes more sense (although, not for the reason you have stated. You would have to find some manual method to convert a production order from supporting one sales order item, to supporting another sales order item. Possible but difficult). Anyway, the above mentioned customized filter would also work in an MTO environment.
Regards,
DB49

Mail app crashes when receiving email from a particular sender

HI All,
Here is a problem I'm facing, Mail App crashes while receiving email from a particular sender. I'm testing our new Email Hosting solution "Rackspace" and it works fine with all other Email clients or on deveices (Android, Windows Phone & Blackbarry) but on Iphone 4s (IOS 6.1.4, i guess) it crashes the Mail App.
The email I'm using is sending over to an email at ttv-asia.com domain. The user of ttv-asia.com is based in China and just to see if the problem is with the Iphone, I've tested the Iphone's Mail App in Hong Kong and it works normal.
So now... Im confused and have no Idea on how ro fix this.
~Ray
<Email Edited By Host>

Sorted, it seems that livemail configured for exchange and having Google premier for exchange, results in the mail app on the iPhone crashing, when selecting an email in the Google exchange mail box, then calling up the folders , it crashes. switched off livemail mail, worked fine.
Weird.
Google vs Microsoft, with a little help from Apple ???????????

TS3276 What if you're not receiving email from a specific sender?

For some reason, I cannot receive email from a specific sender. I can send it to her, if she sends it back, I do not receive it.
If she sent to four people, and I was one of them, I won't receive email but others will and if the others try to forward that email
to me, I won't receive it but I will receive separate emals from them. Why is this?

Have you checked you junk folder on the computer. Also, check spam folders at your email provider's website. Also check any settings that may exclude this sender.
If the sender in your Address Book. Make sure they are so they will be excluded from junk filtering.
Also, check any rules that could delete or junk message from this sender or content it may contain.

Multiple Message Mapping with same Idoc, Sender and Receiver

Hi,
We have one Interface sending INVOIC02 Idoc from SAP R3 4.6C to SAP R3 4.6C through XI 3.0.
On Inbound side we are using SAP standard configuring one Partner Profile with inbound INVOIC MM process code INVL.
In customizing, we have defined one invoic type for the EDI partner.
Now we have to integrate another type of inbound invoic, but in customizing it's not possible to assign more than one invoic type to the same Partner EDI.
So, we have a restriction in SAP 4.6C inbound standard. On the other hand, we can't desing two Integration Scenarios in XI 3.0 with the same idoc INVOIC02, for the same sender service and receiver service because Integration Directory doesn't allow to create two interface determination for them.
We are thinking on using header mapping in XI (receiver agreement to avoid use the same EDI partner profile for the inbound invoic, but we can't assign the same client and technical system with the same ALE Logical System in SLD for two different business systems.
Does anybody have any solution for this problem, SAP side or XI side?.
Thank you
Best regards
Luis

Hi!
In XI configuration - interface determination, you can specify more than one Inbound interface. If you identify more than one, you get a new column where you specify condition (xpath) for selecting between the different inbound interfaces.
In 4.6c, you can have more than one inbound invoic for the same EDI partner profile, if you separate between them using message function. Just add a new inbound parameter with a different message function, or copy the one you have and specify another message function, i,e. "DIFF".
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Oeystein

File-XI-File:one sender channel, multiple receiver channels on same BS

Hi !
We need to send some files from one server to another. On the source, the filenames have a fixed prefix and a timestamp. On the target, the files should have a fixed name (time stamp trimmed). We would like to use one sender channel with the advanced file selection option and for example 3 receiver channels, each channel for each fixed filename. All destination channels are for the same business service. And because we do not need mapping, and want to improve performance, we don't use the repository.
Is this possible? or because this only a 3 files scenario, we should make it as 3 different scenarios, each with its own sender and receiver channels?
Thanks,
Matias

Hey
>>But Ahmad, as mentioned in the blog, XI scenario without IR can be used only if it's non xml mesage. Is that right?
can you please tell me where it says this:)
is it this line which is confusing you <b>"Contrary to popular believe, the message or document sent thru XI does NOT have to be in XML format"</b> ?
well it just means that you can send any data(.jpeg,.pdf xml .xls or anything) by doin the bypass scenario.
IDOC's are something which can give u problems if you dont do IR steps(specially mapping)coz a lot of values need to be hard coded.but suppose ur doing a async File to RFC,then i guess you can do that by using the bypass scenario.
i won't count on bypass scenarios for all of my requirements,but yeah if both source and target have exactly same data type i will give it a shot,irrespective of the interface i m integrating.
Thanx
Ahmad
Message was edited by:
Ahmad

Multiple message threads from same person

I have multiple message threads from the same person in messages on my iPhone and iPad. One comes from their phone number and one from their email. Here are all the details, I would love to be able to combine them into one thread.
This other person and myself each have a new MacBook Pro, iPad Air 2, I have an iPhone 6 and they have an iPhone 5S. They are all updated with the most recent system software.
On my MacBook Pro, the conversations that are split on my iPhone and iPad are not split. On the MacBook Pro, all of the texts from both conversations are appearing in one. In my contacts which are syncing with iCloud I have both the phone number and email address of this other person.
I have messages set up on all of my devices to send and receive from my phone number and my email, start new conversations is from my phone number. This other person has it set up the exact same way on all of their devices.
So why when I text this person from one conversation thread and they respond it comes through to the other conversation thread?
Why can't I seem to join these two conversations when everything is set up the way it should be and they ARE joined on my MacBook Pro but not my iPhone and iPad?

She kept the same number on her new phone, but now there are 2 conversation threads. A new one started with messages sent from the new phone, the old phone should be out of service now. Why didn''t messages sent by the new phone resume in the same conversation? I assume because it's a different IMEI. But now whenever I use her phone number to create a new message, it goes in the old IMEI*'s conversation thread and is therefore not delivered. It's in green so it thinks it's an SMS also not a iMessage device.
If I want to send a message correctly to the new phone, I have to make sure I go into the correct newer thread and enter it there,
For your second answer, the person is receiving the message but the thread now says "email address", not the person's name in the contact list. The sender is sending to the person's phone number, not her email address.

BPEL - multiple receive elements for same partner/operation

Is it possible to have more Receive elements for same operation in one BP? I need to create a business process for approving requests in a number of steps. The process looks like this:
RECEIVE (createRequest)= INVOKE (...)
< REPLY (createRequest)
RECEIVE (approveRequest)= INVOKE (...)
< REPLY (approveRequest)
RECEIVE (approveRequest)= INVOKE (...)
< REPLY (approveRequest)
(...)The creation and first recieve element for "approveRequest" is ok, but the others are never executed. I believe the correlation sets are set correctly. I also can't use a While element since every step could be a bit different. If I substitute the other recieves for different operations, the whole process executes correctly.
Can someone please advice me on what i am doing wrong? If it's somehow not possible to have more then one Recieve for a particular message in one BP, what is the best way to do it differently?

Thank you for your answer. I tried to change the Receive elements to Pick + OnMessage, but it's not working either. It goes past the first one but it never reaches the second one. That's what i had in the first place - two Pick elements after each other, each with an 'approve' and 'dispprove' branch, but it didn't work so I simplified it to an easier process with just receive elements.
If it's working for you, do you do something special in the process? Which version of OpenESB are you using? Would it be possible for you to send the BPEL file? Here is a part of mine I've just made to test this solution.
<bpws:pick name="Pick1">
    <bpws:onMessage partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemIn5">
        <bpws:correlations>
            <bpws:correlation set="orderItemId" initiate="no"/>
        </bpws:correlations>
        <bpws:sequence name="Sequence2">
            <bpws:assign name="Assign7">
                <bpws:copy>
                    <bpws:from>true()</bpws:from>
                    <bpws:to part="return" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut4"/>
                </bpws:copy>
            </bpws:assign>
            <bpws:reply name="Reply3" partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut4"/>
        </bpws:sequence>
    </bpws:onMessage>
</bpws:pick>
<bpws:pick name="Pick2">
    <bpws:onMessage partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemIn6">
        <bpws:correlations>
            <bpws:correlation set="orderItemId" initiate="no"/>
        </bpws:correlations>
        <bpws:sequence name="Sequence1">
            <bpws:assign name="Assign6">
                <bpws:copy>
                    <bpws:from>true()</bpws:from>
                    <bpws:to part="return" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut3"/>
                </bpws:copy>
            </bpws:assign>
            <bpws:reply name="Reply2" partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut3"/>
        </bpws:sequence>
    </bpws:onMessage>
</bpws:pick>

Load Multiple Tables (schemas) from same XML file

Hi,
This is first time i am working XML files.
I have one XML file with two tables (schema). I need to load those two tables into two different Target tables.
This is the startegy to choose tables.
<Entry type="full"> --Table 1
<Entry type="short">--Table 2
I am try to find the tables like this using condition split (Type == "Full" ) but tables are not splitting as expected, is am i going with wrong approach??
Can anyone suggest me to process multiples tables from same XML file??

Hi Naveen,
After the issue in my environment, the package works well that the data in the XML file load to two destination tables based on one column values. The screenshot is for your reference:
To troubleshoot this issue, could you please check the values in the type column? Verify the values have exactly the same characters, case sensitivity. It seems that you haven’t write correct values in the Conditional Split Transformation. They should be like
below:
If there are any other questions, please feel free to ask.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

I can't receive emails from only one sender

In last month I have not been able to receive emails from one sender...in my address book.

So just one person can't send you an email but everyone else sends to you and you get them? Then perhaps that sender isn't sending to your correct email address.

Cannot receive emails from a specific sender

attempting to receive emails from a email address i.e. [email protected] Hav tried adding contact lists and have attempted changing filters in Apple mail, but still not getting the email . How can I solve this?

Check and see if the e-mail is on the e-mail provider's web site. It may be getting rejected by the e-mail provider.

Not receiving email from a particular sender

Hi,
I've been subscribing to a newsletter for 2 years and receiving daily emails until about 2 months ago. Then the email stopped arriving from this source. The sender says I'm on the distribution list and i believe them as I pay a fee for this service. They suggest there may be something wrong with my mailbox setup. I use my Mac.com mail account and have troubleshooted preferences and rules etc and read "help". If I inadvertently "bounced" an email, would this cause all future emails to stop?
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
John.

Have you checked you junk folder on the computer. Also, check spam folders at your email provider's website. Also check any settings that may exclude this sender.
If the sender in your Address Book. Make sure they are so they will be excluded from junk filtering.
Also, check any rules that could delete or junk message from this sender or content it may contain.

Multiple programs recording from same sou

Hi, I have a audigy and I cant use the record function in multiple programs. Like, when im using the teamspeak and try to open skype, just the teamspeak can record from microphone and skype dont work.
Any help, thank you.

You would have to close your DAQmx reference in one vi before another vi could open one on the same DAQ device. You could have some sort of flag variable, maybe a LV style functional global, that would signal the need for DAQ use. Some sort of arbitration scheme in a separate vi would determine who gets priority over DAQ use. It would then send signals (more funtional globals) to each subvi telling them who should close and who should open. The differenct vi's would have to coninually poll the functional globals to see if they should open or close their session. This will be quite complex.
- tbob
Inventor of the WORM Global

Multiple Receiver Dtermination from Same Business Sender Service to RecvStp

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for