Multiple routing and BOM

Hai gurus,
1) My client manufacture whisky using process industry scenario.
2) They produce whisky in bottling unit using either Auto line 1 or Auto line 2( work center)
3) Also they select the BOM 1 or BOM 2( Old bottle or New Bottle) based on the availability.
4) So for selection of BOM i had created the production version using old and new bottle.
5) How to select the routing as it will be known only while converting planned orde to process order.
6)  Actually i am selecting the BOM1 or BOM2(old or new bottle) based on the availability during partial  conversion of
     planned order to process order or by doing read pp master.
7) If that is case how to select the routing  Auto line 1 or 2)while converting planned order to process order as it will known      only on the  begining of that day production.
waiting for the positive reply
regards,
sekar chand

Hai Kumar,
Thanks for you reply.
In Production Version we define the selection of BOM1 or BOM2( old or new bottle) based on the availability.
But the work center Auto line 1 may be used under BOM 1 and BOM2 based on the capacity or avialbility of the line
or Auto line 2 may be used under BOM 1 and BOM 2 based on the availabilty of the line.
It that is the case how to create Production version and select the same, for work center and BOM
waiting for the positive reply.
Regards,
sekar chand

Similar Messages

  • How to maintain the synchronization between routing and bom in Production V

    We are maintaining the Prod version and assigning BOM and Routing to the prod version.
    But if user does not assign the mentioned BOM to the respective routing and selects the alternative BOM.
    Then how to keep the check the Production Version.
    Is any way to keep the Sync between, Prod version and related BOM and Routing.
    Amit Shah
    Edited by: SAP2511 on Feb 2, 2011 11:56 AM

    Dear,
    Go to T.Code: C223 enter your plant and press enter you will get the details of the all production version You will get Green light for correct PV's
    Select all PV and do the consistency check.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Routing and BOM from SAP ME to SAP ECC. Is it possible?

    Hi,
    Is it possible to send the routings from SAP ME to SAP ECC the way we send from SAP ECC to SAP ME.
    Kind Regards
    Suhas

    Hello,
    No it's not possible. Only ERP->ME direction is available as ERP is the source of masterdata usually.
    regards,
    Konstantin

  • Pending Routing or BOM material list with material in MARA table

    I want to tally the material codes in MARA table with the materials without routing and BOM . i.e. pending Routing or BOM material list with material in MARA table.
    Before MRP run How we will get this list ?
    Pl' give reply.
    Thanks .
    Regards.

    Hi Kishore,
    SAP does not have any standard reports to suite your requirement. What i would suggest is to take couple of data extract from table to validate.
    1. First dowload all materials which should have "BOM" and "Routing". This you can do by extracting "MARC" table data where field "BESKZ = 'E' or 'X' ".
    2. Now you can extract the data from "MAST" for BOM and "MAPL" for Routing details.
    Now do VLOOK up in excel to find the mismatch data.
    This can also be done by a customised program, which i dont think it is required since it is going to be used only once.
    You could also try SQVI with table joins
    Hope this helps...Reward your points if so,
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Routing and Recipe differences

    Can any one explain the differences of Routing and Recipe.

    Hi
    In the routing part you maintain the operations/phases, like Reaction, Workup, Packing etc. You specify which resources you use, consumptions of activities, like Fixed cost, Energy (if not maintained as materials) etc.
    You' also specify relations between the different operations, like Work up starts 1 hour after the reaction is complete.
    Recipe refers to the Manufacturing process for Process Industry, this is analogous to combination of Routing and BOM in Discrete Industry.
    Mainly Master Recipe will contain Phases linked to Resources, control recipe destination, Material list etc.
    You can also link up a set of Process instructions, creating a PI-sheet. Confirmations also can be carried from pi sheets.
    regards
    Srinivas

  • Home Networking and Multiple Router Set up Problem

    Router 1 (Main Access Point)                   
            X               
    (Routers 1 and 2 connected via a wireless bridge)
    Router 2 (Wired Access Point)
        X       
    (Router 2 and 3 connected via a wired bridge)
    Router 3 (Wired & Wireless Access Point)    Note:broadcasting under a different SSID
             X   
    Problem:
    When I set up a wireless and wired bridge my Internet connection works perfectly and I can connect to the second SSID. If, however,  I close out of my browsing session and come back to my laptop several hours later and open a browser, I get the “webpage cannot be displayed” message.
    I suspect this has to do with IP addresses changing from the main router after a certain amount of time.
    What could be causing this?
    What can I do to stop this from happening?
    Thanks for any help
    EML

    Running multiple router behind router can be tricky and may be the cause of your dropouts if you don't have it configured properly.
    Cisco recommends using your best router as your primary router and DHCP server.
    The best way to setup for home networks, in my opinion, is to use only one router, and put the other router(s) in bridge mode.  Also, make sure your modem is not a router too.
    http://www6.nohold.net/Cisco2/GetArticle.aspx?docid=28cee6a2fb0d4176a2210942d1d5836c_Setting_up_the_...
    http://homecommunity.cisco.com/t5/Wireless-Routers/Guest-access-never-displays-password-prompt-on-EA...

  • Multiple routing tables and/or policy routing

    Hey all,
    I'm trying to configure a Mac Mini (10.8) for multiple routing tables and policy routing.  This server runs Ostinato, a freeware traffic generator.  My purpose is to generate traffic on multiple VLANs towards different gateways and different destinations.  To that end, I have VLAN tagged the (only) Ethernet port and configured 5 VLANs on it.  The first one has the default route (I manage this Mac over this VLAN).  The other four have IP addresses in the test range I'm using. 
    The goal is to have traffic sourced from IP-address-X go out vlanX towards gateway-X.  It's counterpart on the far end runs Linux and I have configured it in this way:
    ip route add default via <gateway-X> dev ethX table X
    ip rule add from <network-X> table X priority X
    Researching on OpenBSD forums (since it's the base of MacOS X), provided this:
    route -T X add 0.0.0.0/0 -iface <gateway-X>
    echo pass in from <network-X> to 0.0.0.0/0 rtable X | pfctl -mf -
    However, the Mountain Lion "route" command does not support the -T option, so that killed that idea.  Another forum suggested that this would have worked on 10.4:
    ipfw add X fwd <gateway-X> ip from <IP-address-X> to any
    I tried this on 10.8 though the man page says it's deprecated, and (surprise, surprise) it did not work. 
    Any ideas to get this working appreciated!
    Thanks,
    Aaron

    Still doesn't have it in 10.9.4.
    irene:~ cschwartz$ sudo bash
    bash-3.2# route -T add
    route: illegal option -- T
    usage: route [-dnqtv] command [[modifiers] args]
    I'm guessing you want policy-based routing due to VLANs...? If you can get a USB-to-Ethernet adapter, then maybe you can work around this by using multiple physical links instead of VLAN tagging. But if you need source-based routing etc. then no.

  • How to setup ADSL moden router and Airport Express 802.11n (1st Generation) to provide internet and airplay connections to multiple devices?

    I have a Netgear wireless ADSL modem router (wireless + four ethernet out ports)  that i'd like to connect to a 1st gen Airport Express to create a small home network to provide internet access for a MacBook, iPhone and Apple TV, and to provide Airplay connection to the Apple TV and Airport Express audio output jack.
    I'd like to turn off the wireless function of the ADSL modem router, and to have from one of its ethernet out ports an ethernet cable providing internet directly connected to my MacBooks ethernet port.
    Then from one of the other ethernet outs on the ADSL modem router an ethernet cable connected to the Airport Express's ethernet port. This would be to provide wireless internet connection for the Apple TV and iPhone via WiFi from the AE.
    At the same time as the MacBook is receviing internet soley via the ethernet in port, i'd like it to have WiFi connection to the AE to provide Airplay connection to the Apple TV and the AE's audio out jack.
    Is this all possible? How should I go about to configure this? How should the AE's ethernet port be configured?
    Any special modes the ADSL modem router or Airport Express should be in? ie bridge or client?
    Thanks

    On the ADSL modem router web-based interface, should I set any security setting? I think not as there'll be no wireless signal coming from it, only wired ethernet connections to both MacBook and AE. Security should only be set on the AE to prevent someone from accessing its WiFi signal. Is this assumption correct?
    These are all correct!
    How should I go about setting up security for this network?
    First I would recommend that you configure the AirPort Express for WPA2 Personal. This will provide you with the greastest level of security while still providing excellent bandwidth performance.
    You would configure wireless security for the Express by using the AirPort Utility on a Mac, PC, or iOS device. Using your MacBook Pro as an example, you would do so as follows:
    Run the AirPort Utility.
    Select the Express, and then, click on Edit.
    Select the Wireless tab to enable it.
    Set the Wireless Security option to: WPA2 Personal
    Enter the desired password in both the Wireless Password & Verify Password fields. Note: Use of a "strong" password is encourage here. By strong, I mean use a mix of upper/lowercase letters, numbers, & punctuation marks. Try not to use common dictionary words. If you operate your wireless in an area where security is of an utmost concern, I would further suggest that you change the wireless security password every 60-90 days. Also don't forget to change the default AirPort Base Station Administrator password as well.
    Click on Update and allow the Express to restart.

  • Multiple users and shopping carts, one searchable index?

    Hi all,
    I've got an idea but I would like to know if it possible with Business Catalyst. I'll try and explain as simply as possible:
    I have multiple users (let's say 10). They all need separate shopping carts as they are all selling different products. They all need their own admin areas that keep track of their incomes, workflows, shopping carts, etc. They are essentially 10 independent users. Will the WebCommerce10 plan satisfy their needs, or will 10 separate WebCommerce single plans need to be sold?
    Taking the above into account, is there anyway to have 10 independent shopping carts, but they can all be searchable simultaneously? e.g. think eBay, lots of users with their own independent admin areas and products, but one search field returning many results from all the user's shopping carts? Is there anyway to achieve something like this with BC? Can subdomains do this? Any other ideas how to achieve this if none of the above is possible?
    My plan B is having a landing page where a link for each of the 10 users will take them to their relevant shopping carts, but this experience isn't quite as integrated as I would like, from a web surfer's point of view.
    Thanks.
    Clint,
    Komma Media

    Hi Robbie,
    Yes, this would require significant modification to the shopping cart functionality. As it is now, it's very dependent the ShoppingCart being associated with the session and therefore the user. To change that would be significant work.
    Additionally, if you had two people logging in to the same account and editing the same order around the same time, this would tend to not to work well. This is because two users would be two sessions and they would often get routed to different app server instances. Because the way orders are managed, there's no way to immediately sync up the changes between multiple instances, and if you managed to do it would likely slow things down drastically. I would not recommend trying this with ATG.
    Thanks.
    Nick Glover
    Oracle Support for ATG Products

  • How to set up 6th Generation AirPort Extreme to cable modem as a wireless router and then connect my 3rd Generation Time Capsule to AirPort Extreme as a wireless extender?

    What is the best way to set up my 6th Generation AirPort Extreme (A1521) to my cable modem as a wireless router and then connect my 3rd Generation Time Capsule (A1355) to my AirPort Extreme as a wireless extender? I live in a small 1 story house and I currently have the Airport Extreme connected to my cable modem in the living room and the Time Capsule plugged into the wall in my bedroom. I am able to wirelessly connect to the internet using the AirPort Extreme as my router and I can also do wireless back ups to my Time Capsule. My problem is that my connection seems to be really slow! My 1TB Time Capsule back up is only half way complete and it has been 3 days! My computer has been backing up all day and night for almost 72 hours and its still not even 75% complete. I have backed up to this Time Capsule in the past and it never took this long. I am thinking that when I set up my AirPort Extreme and Time Capsule using AirPort Utility I must have set it up incorrectly or something.
    How do I set up my Airport Extreme and Time Capsule for the fastest possible internet speed and back up speed?
    Thank you,

    AirPort Utility 5.6 works with AirPort Extreme 802.11g base stations.
    It works with N version airports.
    It will also show details of the AC model but cannot be used for the setup.. mostly.
    I purposely got the new 6th Gen Airport Extreme so my internet connection would be a lot faster!
    Your network will be much faster when you have AC client directly connected to the AE. Older client will go no faster.. but what is worse.. extend wireless is mixing new and old wireless standards.. guess what one wins.. OLD.. So when you extend wireless.. you have no improvement whatsoever. This whole post is about extending wireless.. so you cannot extend to older equipment and do any better.. maybe slightly better signal although from your comments that isn't happening either.
    I would rather not have to use an ethernet at all with the TC and I don't know EOP adapters are!
    If you do not use ethernet then you are going to be forced to accept slow speed.
    EOP (ethernet over power). Also called homeplug in the US.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HomePlug
    Provides a method of networking over power cabling that already exists in your house.
    So what your saying is for the fastest internet speed and back up speed possible I should keep my Airport Extreme plugged into my Modem and keep my TC set up as a wireless extender? Then when I want to do back ups I should plug an ethernet cable from my TC to my MacBook Pro?
    To spell this out.
    A wireless link to an extended device will go very slowly.. if it is not direct.
    So lets say you have a laptop sitting in the lounge.. Your connection goes.. Laptop- - - - - AE- - - - -TC.
    That means two wireless links.. wireless has this nasty half duplex and single channel nature.. it can send or receive (Tx or Rx) but not at the same time.
    Ethernet by contrast does both at once. It is full duplex.
    Wireless can talk to one client at a time.. so if there are multiple items using wireless lets say 4 devices.. then your computer gets a 25% time slice. Since wireless cannot handle multiple simultaneous connections.
    Ethernet by contrast can connect multiple computers to multiple destinations at the same time.. all transmitting and receiving at full speed.
    When you put all this together.. there are a couple of rules for fast connection.
    1. Use ethernet at all times. Where you cannot use ethernet use anything but wireless.. eg EOP (homeplug) at least to try and get rid of wireless.
    2. Where you must use wireless use it sparingly and make sure it is never more than one hop.. ie never have an extend wireless (repeater is more usual term). Repeater will cause instant slowdown of 50% and maybe up to 75% just because it is so inefficient.
    3. Fastest wireless is 5ghz but it has very short range.. you need to be up close and personal to get it working.
    Apple routers however unless you do manual setup I suggest are set to connect to best signal strength not best speed. It will therefore use 2.4ghz at 25% less speed than 5ghz because it is 1db better signal.. this madness means you need to setup manually for the best setup.

  • Wireless router and base station help

    Hello fellas -- I'll really, really appreciate any help I can get with this, so thanks in advance for any advice given. Here we go...
    I purchased a MacBook (2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 160GB hard drive, 2GB RAM) about two months ago. It runs Mac OS X Tiger (10.4.9). Previously, I had a Sony Vaio desktop in my downstairs bedroom, and an HP Pavilion desktop in my mom's office upstairs. I have Comcast "high-speed" cable internet service. Downstairs (where the Vaio was) I have a surfboard cable modem with three cords coming out of the back: 1.) a power cord (obviously); 2.) a cable cord that runs into the wall for internet service; and 3.) an ethernet-looking network cable. This ethernet/network cable would have normally run right out the back of the surfboard cable modem and into the network port on the back of my Sony Vaio, but in order to provide internet service for my mom's HP upstairs, the network cable went from the back of the surboard modem and into a D-Link wireless router that we bought. Another network cable then went from the D-Link wireless router into the network port on the back of my Vaio. This provided both my Vaio and my mom's HP with good, steady cable internet access.
    When I bought this new MacBook, it came with an AirPort Extreme card (no base station yet) that allowed me pick up on the wireless signal from the D-Link wireless router and this provided me with internet service. To connect to the internet, I would connect to the wireless network that my computer called "default." By this point, I had shut down and unplugged my Vaio, so it's out of the picture now -- the MacBook has replaced it. However, I left the surfboard cable moden and the D-Link wireless router plugged in, and this way I was able to connect to the default network wirelessly with my MacBook, and my mom was still provided with wireless service from the D-Link router on her HP upstairs. This worked great for awhile, until eventually this default network started getting rediculously slow and started disconnecting itself every 30 to 45 seconds -- literally. For this reason, I went out and bought an AirPort Extreme Base Station at my local Apple Store.
    First, to make sure it worked, I unplugged the network cable (the one coming from the back of the surfboard cable modem) from the back of the D-Link wireless router and I plugged it directly into the base station I just bought. In other words, I took the D-Link router out of the picture and plugged the base station directly into my surfboard cable modem. This worked great, and it's how I'm connected to the internet as we speak -- it's providing me with steady, fast service. Instead of connecting to the default wireless network that was slowing me down before, I now connect to the base station's network, called "Apple Network 2b1d46." There's only one problem, though -- it involved taking the D-Link wireless router out of the picture, so now my mom can't get on the internet with her HP. The solution seemed very simple -- instead of plugging the surfboard cable modem directly into the base station, I would plug the surfboard modem into the D-Link wireless router, and then plug that into the base station. I saw no reason why this wouldn't work, and I still don't, but for whatever reason, it didn't.
    This is where I need help. When I try to plug it in through the router like that, I simply can't get on the internet. Everything else works perfectly -- the surfboard cable modem's lights are properly lit, as are the D-Link router's lights. The Apple base station's status light is a solid green like it's supposed to be, and strangest of all -- when I open Internet Connect to check my AirPort status, everything is fine there as well. It says "Connected to Apple Network 2b1d46," which is the new base station network that I should be connected to, and under that it says "Connected to the internet via Ethernet," yet when I try to open Safari, it says "You are not connected to the internet," which is in direct contradiction to what Internet Connect is simultaneously telling me (that I am connected to the internet).
    I've tried alot of things to trouble-shoot this. I've tried FireFox and Opera, and they can't bring up any web pages either, so I know the problem isn't just with Safari -- it's that my computer just can't connect to the internet or bring up web pages, even though Internet Connect and everything else says that it's connected. I've also run the Network Diagnostics an uncountable amount of times, and all it can tell me, in all its wisdom, is that my internet connection appears to be working fine and that I must have spelled "www.apple.com" (my home page) incorrectly (it says the same thing about any other web page I try to open). I've ran the network assistant to create a new location, and it also gets the the end of the wizard and tells me that it can't connect to the internet. Finally, I've also ran the AirPort Utility multiple times and set up the base station in every possible way, but still nothing works.
    On that note, I do have one question. When you run the AirPort Utility and choose "Assist Me", at one point during the wizard it asks, "How do you connect to the internet?" Right now, remember, I have the D-Link wireless router taken out of the picture (the base station is plugged directly into the surfboard cable modem). For the answer to this part of the wizard, I chose the option that says, "I use a DSL or cable modem with a static IP address or DHCP." Obviously, given that I'm on the internet as we speak, this is working fine. However, if I bring the D-Link wireless router back into the picture and plug the base station into it (the router), and then plug the router into the surfboard modem, should I still have the same option checked (the one thats says I use a DSL or cable modem with a static IP address or DHCP), or by connecting through the router, should I change my answer to one of the other two options. The second option says, "I use a DSL or cable modem using PPP over Ethernet (PPPoE)." The third option says, "I connect to my local area network (LAN)." I've tried all three numerous times, and none of them work -- I still have the same problem getting on the internet once I connect through the D-Link router, but I thought I could at least find out which one is the right option so I could stop having to keep trying all three of them. Can anyone tell me which of those three options I should pick when connecting through the D-Link wireless router (cable modem with static IP address or DHCP, cable modem with PPPoE, or local area network).
    Sorry, I know that was a long one, but if anyone can answer the previous question for me and/or give me some general advice regarding my problem with getting the internet to work once I hook up the base station through the router instead of directly into the cable modem, I would appreciate it more than you can imagine.
    Thank you very much for your time and help.
    -- Andrew

    I am doing something similar. I have the WAN port on my Linksys 4-port wired router connected to my DSL modem. My G5 and G4 computers are connected directly to the Linksys LAN ports. My older Airport Extreme (flying saucer) is connected to another LAN port on the Linksys. I had to setup the Airrport as a bridge in this configuration. I did this by using the Ethernet LAN port on the Airport instead of the WAN port. In the Airport Setup Utility I said to connect using Ethernet. This seems to work for me.
    I also use manual IP addresses for everything but you will probably want to use DHCP.
    Cheers,
    -= Ken =-

  • Have a D-Link DIR-655 Wireless Router and Having WEP or WPA issues? READ TH

    I just contacted D-Link with the following Letter and wanted to post this here for anyone that may need it:
    "I have to say that I do truly enjoy this product since I got it to work, but I have some things to clear up.
    Are your Level 1 techs truly trained in networking equipment? I called 3 times for help with this issue and no one was able to help me nor completely understand my problem... I apologize for the tone, but it is frustrating when a tech repeats a procedure 4 times (I can understand repeating something 2 times if needed) - when I tell him it doesn't work I feel we should move onto another trouble shooting step. So what I would like to do is tell you what I did to fix the issue in case another person runs into this and they call you for support.
    I have a an iMac (but this problem will be reproduced on any Mac with an Airport Extreme card) and I can only get on the internet wireleslly because of the location of my computer and the cable modem/router.
    The DIR-655 that I picked up from best buy was Hardware Revision A2 and the Firmware was 1.05 (the latest at this current time)...
    If I setup this router with the default settings. The wireless connectivity worked fine - although if I were to apply any type of security to the wireless settings (WEP, WPA 1 or 2 Personal) I would not be able to join the network. The Mac OS would keep telling me that there was an error joining the "xxxxxx" network (where xxxxxx was the SSID of my router). Anyways after tinkering for almost 3 hours and running back and forth resetting the router and testing with multiple Macs I was stumped and decided to get a copy of the 1.04 version of the firmware and downgrade the router back down to see if it was an issue with the latest firmware. Guess what - works perfect...
    I would love to see a version 1.06 come out soon that addresses this issue and has the bug fixes from 1.05. But I can guarantee you there is something in the 1.05 firmware that will stop Macs from wirelessly connecting to the router when any type of wireless security is in place.
    Please advise your techs of this issues and hopefully come up with a fix for this issue.
    Thank you for your time."
    I hate when tech support eats half your day with something that could have been fixed in minutes if people are properly trained.
    Message was edited by: Twiggs462

    I seem to remember that one post/thread had comments about successfully using this device but I can not seem to find it in either iChat 3 or the iChat 4 (iChat and iChat Sharing in Leopard)
    The closest I got was a reference to it in this thread http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=7296647&#7296647 but no link.
    6:39 PM Saturday; August 16, 2008

  • Multiple routers and subnets - can't access across subnets

    Hey all, I'm having an issue with multiple routers and subnets on my FIOS connection. Here's how everything is setup:
    Primary router:
    ActionTec MI424WR Rev D (from Verizon)
    WAN IP: From ISP
    WAN NETMASK: From ISP
    LAN IP: 192.168.1.1LAN NETMASK: 255.255.255.0
    Secondary router (WAN connected to ActionTec LAN):
    Belkin N750 gigabit w/ 802.11n
    WAN IP: 192.168.1.2
    WAN NETMASK: 255.255.255.0
    LAN IP: 192.168.2.1
    LAN NETMASK: 255.255.255.0
    With this setup, I have the secondary router's WAN port connected to a LAN port on the primary router. Each are broadcasting an SSID and each are running DHCP to assign address to their respective subnets. Everything was well and good, except that I could reach 192.168.1.* systems from 192.168.2.*, but not vice versa -- anything connected to the Primary router was blind to systems connected to Secondary. Also, I could not ping anything on .2 from .1.
    So, I added the following static route to the primary router:
    DESTINATION: 192.168.2.0
    NETMASK: 255.255.255.0
    GATEWAY: 192.168.1.2
    Once this was added to the router, I could ping everything, so that was good. However, even though .1 can now ping .2, I can't access certain things such as the web interface of my NAS (192.168.2.2). I can ping it, but accessing it in the browser from .1 doesn't work; however, accessing from .2 does work.
    I think the ActionTec router might be blocking it, but that's just a guess. The firewall on this thing has me thoroughly confused. Currently, I have 192.168.1.2 in the DMZ on the ActionTec, but that didn't make a difference. I've also completely disabled the firewall on the secondary Belkin router, but still nothing.
    Any help from the pros here? Much appreciated!
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Ok, I figured it out and everything is now working. The issue appears to be that the ActionTec router doesn't recognize traffic from Subnet 1 to Subnet 2 as internal traffic -- it treats it as external traffic and closes it off. To fix this, it required some Advanced Firewall Filters that were far from unituitive and took a lot of testing to get it just right. If anyone runs into a similar situation in the future, here's a rundown of what I did to make it all work:
    Primary Router:
    ActionTec, MI424WR Rev D
    WAN IP/NETMASK:Assigned by ISP
    LAN IP/NETMASK:192.168.1.1 / 255.255.255.0
    Secondary Router:
    Belkin N750 Gigabit w/ 802.11n
    WAN IP/NETMASK:192.168.1.2 / 255.255.255.0
    LAN IP/NETMASK:192.168.2.1 / 255.255.255.0
    Plug Secondary router's WAN port into a LAN port on the Primary router.
    Setup Secondary router to have static LAN address (192.168.1.2)
    At this point, you should have 2 separate subnets: Subnet 1 (192.168.1.*) and Subnet 2 (192.168.2.*).
    Systems on both subnets should be able to reach the internet. Also, Subnet 2 should be able to ping and reach systems on Subnet 1; however, systems on Subnet 1 should not be able to ping or reach systems on Subnet 2. For this, we need to create a static route so Subnet 1 can reach Subnet 2.
    Create and apply the following static route in the Primary router:  (Advanced > Routing)
    RULE NAME:Network (Home/Office)
    DESTINATION:192.168.2.0(your secondary subnet)
    GATEWAY:192.168.1.2(secondary router's WAN IP)
    NETMASK:255.255.255.0
    METRIC:1
    The router now has a route between Subnet 1 (192.168.1.*) and Subnet 2 (192.168.2.*). You should be able to ping systems on Subnet 1 from 2, and ping systems on Subnet 2 from 1. You should not be able to access any systems, though -- the firewall is still blocking all but ping traffic from Subnet 1 to Subnet 2. We need to create some firewall rules to allow this communication.
    Make sure Primary firewall is set to at least typical/medium (Firewall Settings > General).
    We need to create some network objects to make it easier to manage the rules we'll create. Go to Advanced > Network Objects and do the following:
    1.Click Add. You are now on Edit Network Object screen. 
    2.Set Description to 'Subnet 1'.
    3.In Items section below, click Add.
    4.Set Network Object Type to 'IP Subnet'.
    5.Set Subnet IP Address to 192.168.1.0.
    6.Set Subnet Mask to 255.255.255.0.
    7.Click Apply. You are now back on Edit Network Object screen.
    8.Click Apply. You are now back on Network Objects Screen.
    9.Repeat the above steps again, but this time creating a second network object called 'Subnet 2':
    Nameubnet 2
    IP Subnet:192.168.2.0
    Subnet Mask:255.255.255.0
    Now we create the firewall rules. Go to Firewall Settings > Advanced Filtering.
    In the Inbound/Input rules section, click the Add link next to Network (Home/Office) Rules.
    Create the following Advanced Filter:
    SOURCE ADDRESSelect 'Subnet 1'
    DEST. ADDRESSelect 'Subnet 2'
    PROTOCOL:'Any'
    OPERATION:'Accept Packet'
    OCCUR:'Always'
    Click Apply. You will now be back on the Advanced Filtering page.
    In the Outbound rules section, click the Add link next to Network (Home/Office) Rules.
    Create the following Advanced Filter:
    SOURCE ADDRESSelect 'Subnet 1'
    DEST. ADDRESSelect 'Subnet 2'
    PROTOCOL:'Any'
    OPERATION:'Accept Packet'
    OCCUR:'Always'
    Click Apply. You will now be back on the Advanced Filtering page.
    Click Apply.
    You're all done. You should now have internet access on both subnets, be able to ping across subnets and also be able to access services across subnets (local webservers, SSH, telnet, mail, etc). You will not be able to see network file shares across subnets in Windows, however, as this requires a WINS server (which is well outside the scope of this post). For instance, I have a Western Digital NAS on the 192.168.2.0 subnet that I can access as \\Mybooklive\ from within Subnet 2; on Subnet 1, however, I have to access it by its IP \\192.168.2.10\. 

  • What's the difference between transport route and transport layer

    what's the difference between transport route and transport layer,Can somebody give me some explaination? thks in advance!

    Hi,
    Transport Layer in ABAP Workbench
        The Change and Transport System supports the distribution of development
        work on large projects across multiple SAP Systems.
        The packages in each development system are grouped into one transport
        layer.
        The transport layer determines whether objects are assigned to a local
        or transportable change request.
    Use
        Each of your SAP development systems is assigned a transport layer as
        its standard transport layer. If you use Extended Transport Control, you
        can assign different standard transport layers to certain clients.
        You can define at the most one consolidation target for each SAP System
    and transport layer.
    When you create a package, it is assigned the standard transport layer
    of the SAP System.
    If you want to assign a different transport layer to a package, you
    require the administration authorization for the Change and Transport
    System.
    The objects in a package automatically have the transport attributes
    defined for the corresponding transport layer.
    o   If a consolidation route originating in their SAP System is defined,
         then the objects are assigned to a transportable request, and
         transported into the consolidation target when it is released.
    o   If a consolidation route is not defined, the objects are assigned to
         a local request, and are not transported.
    Customizing settings are not assigned to a package. They have the
    transport attributes of the standard transport layer of the system or
    client.
    It is best to assign a package a standard transport layer for which a
    consolidation route originating in the development system is defined.
    To display and maintain the transport layers and routes, use the
    Transport Management System (transaction STMS).
    Only the system adminstrator can make changes.
    Caution:
         The tables TSYST, DEVL, TWSYS, TASYS are no longer productive as of
         Release 4.0A and cannot be maintained.
    Regards
    Ben

  • What's the difference between Routing and Service Callout in ALSB?

    I am puzzled by that.
    what's the difference between them.
    Or what's the situation should use Routing, and that of service callout?

    There is little difference between routing and service callout.
    Routing is symbolizes the transition of request thread to a response thread starts. (in OSB every invocation of proxy is undertaken by different request and response threads ). So by this definition, there can be only one route node in a pipeline.
    Service call out is also used for similar actions as route node , but in pipeline. So service callout can be either in request pipeline (request thread) or in response pipeline (response thread ) . So in a proxy you can have multiple ServiceCallouts but only one route node.
    There are some other slight differences.
    Manoj

Maybe you are looking for

  • MM - Pedido de Compra - Atribuição de Esquema de Cálculo

    Olá pessoal, É possível atribuir um determinado esquema de cálculo a um determinado tipo de Pedido de Compras? Qual a regra de determinação do esquema de cálculo? Grato,

  • Premiere Elements 12 install okay! But driver monitor not good?

    Program says: (in Dutch: "Er is een niet-compatibel stuurprogramma voor de monitor aangetroffen. Werk het stuurprogramma bij voor een betere en snellere weergave.") = There is a non-compatible driver for the monitor. Update your driver for better and

  • IllegalStateException whit Frames using JSP

    Hi friends! I have a huge problem. I have 2 servlets and 2 JSPs, my first servlet (QueryServlet) forward normally. but in the second Servlet (PersDataServlet) not. appears an Exception like this: IllegalStateException: Cannot forward after response h

  • Adding an image when signing, but not in the signature field, in Reader

    Hi, I would like to know if it is possible to add an image to a pdf document when I sign the document in Reader. I do not want to add the image in the signature field as a signature, but rather below the signature field. The image is 'n barcode provi

  • Quicktime Recovery Problem

    I wasn't sure if this should be in the mac quicktime area or the PC quicktime area, but since the files were created on a mac originally, I put the question here. I recently had an external western digital drive problem where Final Cut Pro froze whil