Multiple Search in next version of Mail ?

I often need the use of a "multiple search" option in Mail. I have found a program that does that : http://www.mailsteward.com, but it's not integrated in Mail, and the search results are not very Mac-friendly.
Is "multiple search" going to be implemented in Mail for Leopard ?
Thanks,
Laurent

Hi Terence,
Thanks for the tip. It's a nice way to do it, I didn't know it was possible and this could save me some time.
Still, I don't think that creating a smart mailbox is an ideal way to do a search but this could do the trick for now. I hope that multiple search will be integrated in next Mail.
Laurent

Similar Messages

  • Ideas for next version of mail (developers??)

    1. remove the unread status of mails in the "junk" folder by default. (I don't need to know how many junk mails I have)
    2. Change the picture of mails in the "sent" folder to that of the recipient, not my face. (I don't need to stare at my face when checking mails I have sent to people)
    thanks!

    1. You may not need or care to know but since no spam filter is 100% and false positives can and do occur, many users (or most users I should say) are interested in being aware of how many new messages received that were automatically marked as junk and moved to the account's junk mailbox. I certainly do especially since I have the Junk mailbox for each account set to be automatically erased after one day.
    2. What if you have multiple recipients in the To: field?

  • Next version of Apple Mail features

    Does anyone know if the next version of Apple Mail might add the ability to use bullet formats, numbers, and lists when composing an email? I really like Apple Mail, I miss those features which can be found in Entourage.

    The next version of Mail, which will come with Leopard (OS X 10.5), is going to have something called Stationery, which are essentially HTML templates.
    It seems like most of them are going to be pretty mails that you can add your own images to--things like baby announcements, invitations, etc.
    However, since this means that HTML support in Mail will be expanded, it may mean that you will be able to use HTML to create ordered and unordered lists.
    Of course, the value of Stationery depends on the recipient of the mail being able to view HTML mail as well.
    However, I haven't seen any word of a built-in list function at this point.
    G4 933 mhz Quicksilver   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   Wacom Intuos 2 tablet; Epson 2400 Photo; HP Deskjet 6840; LaCie 80gb D2 FWDV

  • Mail will not work, it says "you can"t use this version of mail with this version of mac os x. mail version 4.5 help please

    Mail icon displays the following "you can't use this version of mail with this version of mac os x"
    Mail version 4.5
    It was ok on friday, my daughter used the mac to update her ipod to ios6, would this cause a problem?
    All my updates are up to date.
    Any help, thanks.

    !! WARNING !!
    about the September 2012
    "Security Update 2012-004"
    If you've got "Mail.app" in a folder OTHER THAN the root "Applications" folder,
    MOVE "MAIL.APP" TO THE APPLICATIONS FOLDER
    **BEFORE** INSTALLING THE "004" UPDATE!!
    Because *IF* you use OSX's integrated Software Update app from the Apple menu to do the "004" updating, and *IF* your Mail.app is NOT in the Applications folder, then buddy, you've got some sitdown fixit time ahead of ya and/or some internet tie-up time downloading the "004" update file itself.
    Been through it all, already.  In fact, just got done getting my Mail back up & running. And I tried everything short of attempting to unpacking my "Mail.pkg" receipt file using... whatever... even Pacifist couldn't get it out. So that fixit "Plan D" died quick. And I'm not savvy enough to use Terminal commands to do "Plan E," so that SUDO stuff was my brick wall.
    So I compressed my entire "Mail" subdirectory that contain all my emails, for safekeeping during the required surgery, or whatever would work, leaving the original Mail directory where it was. In case something bad happened in all my fixit whatevers, the one thing I *didn't* want to cross paths with was a hosed Library -> Mail folder. Then I'd be pssd. But I can wipe out that ZIP now 'cause all's well now. After 6 hrs of downloading thru a mobile broadband hotspot running at only 14KB/sec speed due to my having gone over my T-Mobile hotspot plan's bandwidth amount (throttled-down after reaching the limit, tho not cut off completely. Kinda nice, but it's a huge speed drop).
    I tried moving the two Mail.app versions around, compressing them & then trashing the original so they wouldn't be recognized, blabla, even booted my Mac in Safe Mode & reinstalled the "MacOSX 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard) Update Combo.dmg" update file, which in the past has fixed many problems. But after restarting, not this one.
    Like a dummy who ignored knowing better, I had my Mail.app in a folder other than the Applications folder, with only an alias to that being in the Applications folder. NOT GOOD ENOUGH. The updater don't see that as nuthin special or useful.
    So if you've got, like I've got, "old" icons for Mail.app (v4.5) in your Finder toolbar & in your Dock that all point to "Mail.app v4.5" in whatever folder you've got that in, other than in the Applications folder (where Apple apparently REQUIRES that it be located, and ONLY there, at least for OSX updating purposes), then after you download & autorun that "004" updater using Software Update, NONE of your pre-existing Mail icons will work. And MOST aggravatingly, **NOR** will your brand-new "Mail.app v4.6" work that came out of the "004" updating installation.  So basically, your Mail.app's... all of 'em.... are hosed. But only if you run the "004" update without your "Mail.app v4.5" being located in your Applications folder and ONLY in your Applications folder. And duplicates of Mail.app, scattered around your HDD??  Always a problem with many Apple apps.... The Apple software engineers apparently like 'em to be in the Applications folder, and in ONLY there, and ONLY the latest version, and ONLY 1 single copy of each on your entire HDD. They just don't seem to stress that enough, it appears. Kind of an oversight for them to not emphasize that, IMO...
    My recommendation for this particular September 2012 "004" update:
    If you run Software Update, and if you see the "Security Update 2012-004" listed as available for download, UNCHECKMARK IT.  DO NOT DOWNLOAD IT USING SOFTWARE UPDATE !  Instead, download the actual update file itself.
    Same thing, only a different way of doing it. Most importantly, you'll be skipping the auto-installation that Software Update performs.
    AND you'll have that update file on your HDD for future fixits, should a nasty "unfixable" problem come up.
    First, #1. Do a filename search for "Mail" (Option-Command-Spacebar). Scroll down to where the "Apps" are located in the list under the "Kind" column heading. First, find your Mail.app that's v4.5. Get that bugger into your Applications folder if it's not already there. Next, Trash all other "Mail.app" apps you see in that same list that you may have elsewhere on your HDD.
    #2. Go here: https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1586
    And download the actual "004" DMG update file: "SecUpd2012-004.dmg"
    And of course, it's a biggie.... 270MB... so watching grass grow may be involved here if you've got a slow connection (go to a MacDonalds & do it, like I shoulda done).
    3. After downloading, I'd recommend closing down all apps, emptying the Trash, and restarting.
    Then, after restarting, run Disk Utility's "Repair Disk Permissions."
    Then, doublecheck that the Mail.app version 4.5 is in your Applications folder.
    THEN fire up & install "SecUpd2012-004.dmg."
    Reboot.
    After the reboot, your Mail.app version 4.5 in the Applications folder will have become Mail.app version 4.6 in the Applications folder, and all will be well again.
    And you can dump that zipped-up "Username -> Library -> Mail" folder then, too.
    Happy Mac'in!
    Kevin Kendall
    Macbook 7,1
    (Apple's very last all-white Macbook model)
    2.4GHz - 256GB Crucial SSD - 8GB Crucial RAM
    OS 10.6.8 Build 10K549 + Win 7 Ultimate thru VMWare Fusion v5.0.1

  • Multiple Search Suffixes

    Our internal network is comprised of multiple companies purchased over the past couple of years.  Unfortunately we still have a lot of legacy DNS going on and like 6 different domains on the inside.  Is there a good way to push all 6 dns search suffixes out to the AnyConnect VPN Client?  I tried the split DNS method I found online but when I did it broke DNS completely.  The client was using the local hosts preconfigured DNS servers and not getting the internal network ones.
    Thanks
    Michael

    Hi Terence,
    Thanks for the tip. It's a nice way to do it, I didn't know it was possible and this could save me some time.
    Still, I don't think that creating a smart mailbox is an ideal way to do a search but this could do the trick for now. I hope that multiple search will be integrated in next Mail.
    Laurent

  • The Next Version of Premiere Pro CC - Warp Stabilizer

    With the recent post of what's coming in the next version of PPro CC, I was sad to see no mention of Warp Stabilizer. As amazing of an effect as it is, it needs a bit of help. I know there are improvements and fixes that probably weren't mentioned in the post so I'm still holding out hope. We use Warp Stabilizer more than anyone I know. Several hundred times per week. Yes, per week, no exaggeration. Over the last few years, we've built an entire style of shooting around the strengths of this awesome effect that emulates the use of a slider, steadicam and crane all without having to have them. So we've become really familiar with its PROS and CONS.
    Here is a short list of SEVEN things that should be addressed with regards to warp stabilizer within Premiere Pro CC to maximize its effectiveness (and yes we did submit multiple Feature Requests for these so far to no avail):
    FIrst and foremost and by far MOST IMPORTANT to us - Allow users to create a CUSTOM PRESET with any altered settings that will engage (or begin Analyzing/Stabilizing) automatically when added to a clip!! This is huge. If you double click on Warp Stabilizer with a clip selected, it is applied to that clip and begins the process of stabilizing that clip. However, the vast majority of the time we need to alter the settings of the effect. If we create a custom preset, that's all fine and good, but when we add that to a clip, it does NOT begin stabilizing. Instead you have to manually go into the Effect Controls for each clip and select ANALYZE. Huge waste of time when adding this effect to hundreds of clips. PLEASE FIX!
    BUG when saving projects!!! - If this is not a bug, it needs to be fixed because it's awful. - If you have more than one sequence with multiple warp stabilizations added and GPU ACCELERATION IS ENABLED, then after you SAVE a project (or if it auto-saves) when you toggle between the two sequences you are hit with a delay or freeze while the render bar goes from Yellow to Red...and finally back to yellow again. No work can be done during this delay/freeze. The more stabilized clips, the longer the delay. For us, on our larger projects this delay is sometimes 30 seconds to almost a full minute! Once it turns back to yellow, you can toggle between sequences without the delay...but as soon as it saves again...and you toggle between sequences, the delay hits again. If this is a bug, or somehow a result of Premiere Pro's way of CACHING projects after it's saved, then I sincerely hope it's fixed asap. It's awful!
    The third is more of a feature request than a fix - Add the ability to set the maximum scale to work WITH the smoothness control so that if you never want your clips to scale more than say 105%, you can set that and have Warp Stabilizer stabilize the clip and adjust the "smoothness" percentage from the default "50%" down to whatever it needs to be in order for that clip to be fully stabilized and scaled to no more than 105%. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is not possible currently. Right now we have to manually adjust each clip if it is initially scaled too much by dropping down the Smoothness %.
    Another great feature would be the ability to manually keyframe the scaling so that if you have a longer clip that starts fairly steady, then needs to be smoothed out a bit more in the middle, before it ends relatively steady again, you can slowly and seamlessly ramp up the stabilization/scaling so that the whole clip doesn't have to be scaled to make up for the misgivings of one portion of the clip.
    Minor bug - sometimes when you have extended the length of a clip, the clip needs to be re-analyzed again. However, the "analyze" button is often greyed out. You need to click away from the clip and then click on the clip again to make that button appear again. Nothing big, but still, a small bug.
    After Effects Warp Stablizer VFX feature carried over - It would be nice to carry over to Premiere the ability to isolate what in frame is supposed to be stable (sometimes someone nodding their head can trick the effect into thinking that it's the camera shaking). Great to have it in AE, but would be nice to carry over to Premiere Pro CC.
    Finally, I've always believed that no matter how cool "Subspace Warp" sounds, it is not as effective as "Position, Scale & Rotation". This SHOULD be the deafult "method" within the Warp's settings. I'd say 95% of the thousands and thousands of clips we've stabilized we ended up switching the "Method" within the settings to "Position, Scale & Rotation" because it either scaled the shot less or created less "wobble" in the resulting stabilized clip. I know everyone shoots differently, and sometimes Subspace Warp is the way to go, but we have stabilized all sorts of shots with great success by simply switching this setting. Granted...if #1 on this list was taken care of we could then easily have this set as our default setting.
    Hopefully this list either reaches someone within Adobe that can do something about them or at the very least inspires others to write feature requests and bug fixes as we have. Even resolving #1, #2 and #3 would be HUGE and would save our editors probably 10 hours per week.  It's an awesome effect, far better than "smoothcam" on FCP7, it just needs a little love.

    CoSA_DaveS wrote:
    All good points, thanks for posting.
    For #1, you can make this work in AE at least. This tip is from my colleague DanW:
         If you make a preset by only selecting the values you change (and not a preset for the whole effect) then it will auto-analyze on apply.
         Simplest way: apply WS, make edits, hit UU to reveal changed params, select all "i-beams" in the Timeline, drag them to the Effects & Presets panel.
    For #4, you can get manual control over the scaling by setting Framing to Stabilize Only, and then keyframe Additional Scale to taste. At one point we were going to try to automate this, but found automatic scaling to be very subjective as to the best way to handle it.
    For #6, Warp Stabilizer will not track areas with zero alpha channel. So you can pre-mask the input to reveal just the parts you want to stabilize. Do this inside a nested sequence, with Warp Stabilizer applied downstream (in the outer sequence). The just-announced masking & tracking capabilities of the next CC version should be handy for this.
    -DaveS, Adobe Dynamic Media, Advanced Product Development
    Hi DaveS!
    Great to hear that you guys are taking a look at this list. Hope it helps make it better.  #1, #2, and #3 are by far the biggest time killers for us so hopefully they'll be able to be fixed/resolved within Premiere soon.
    Regarding your note about #1: Allowing this functionality within Premiere specifically would be very helpful. Would it be possible to eventually allow Premiere to auto-analyze when a saved custom preset is applied to a clip? I tried it in AE as you suggested, and couldn't figure it out. But realistically we use Warp Stabilizer on so many clips that round tripping literally hundreds of short clips to AE would be just as time consuming as going into the settings in premiere for each one and adjusting the parameters. We usually adjust the method and then adjust the smoothness scale so that it doesn't "Auto-Scale" more than 104%. That's where our #3 suggestion would help. I didn't quite understand how to make a preset of specific changed values. I tried, but couldn't follow DanW's suggestion. Granted, I'm not that great with AE. I really just use it for the Warp VFX's ability to isolate what in frame is stabilized (hope that comes to Premiere one day) and that's about it. And I really only have to do that a couple times per project. Anyway, I'm sure I'm doing DanW's suggestions wrong but regardless, I'm not sure it would save us much time when we have several hundred individual little clips that would all need to be sent to AE. Any hope for adding this auto-analyze functionality (hopefully allowing a custom preset on the whole effect and all it's adjusted parameters) in Premiere CC?
    Regarding your note about #4: That is a valid work around for now. I appreciate that thought. Thanks!
    Regarding your note about #6: I think I half understand what you described. I'd have to try it. Although, as I said before, the AE way of doing it is ideal and I just hoped that ability to show the tracking points and delete them over time would come to Premiere CC one day. When the next CC comes out I'd love to try this masking method although I think I'll have to claify exactly what you want me to do just to be safe. Is there no hope to port this added functionality that's in AE's Warp VFX over to Premiere's Warp Stabilizer? Again, not the end of the world for us. I'd rather #1, #2 and #3 be addressed inside Premiere Pro CC for now.
    Fixing the first 3 on this list would be HUGE time saver for us.
    Thanks again DaveS to you and the rest of the Adobe team for looking into this list. Very much appreciated.

  • Message to RIM - wish list for next version

    Hi
    Just some thoughts based on a couple of days of use of a playbook that my IT folks lent me.
    Firstly, hopefully RIM will realize that the only way this will take off is if Enterprise users really buy into it but the device lacks in certain areas if it is to be a WorkBook instead of a PlayBook (which other tablets do a better job at) as follows:
    - no way to adjust font size or zoom in the Messages in the BlackBerry bridge - if the higher ups in corporate can't read their messages, they won't buy.
    - even though typing e-mails show you spelling errors w a red underline - there is no way to correct, while in your BBerry, you can call up spelling correction options.  (The same for the other bridge apps, like memos etc, as well).
    - very difficult to edit messages, the touch screen is not sensitive enough so its difficult to place the cursor to exactly to the point you need it in text you have already typed.  Suggest an optical track ball (similar to the ones in the 9700s) or a stylus be incorporated into the next version.
    - even if you are able to get the cursor to the spot you want it in a draft e-mail/memos you can't highlight to cut or copy text to other parts of the e-mail/memo draft.
    - can't view attachments that are part of the calendar entries - but you can on the BBerry itself.
    Think that's it after 2 days of using.  Needless to say, am disappointed as the PlayBook doesn't increase productivity and is lacking in key areas that are part of what makes BBerry a strong product.  I wouldn't buy with my personal funds and think the corporate will not roll out as aggressively as it could the cost/benefit is currently not there.
    Let's see what future software/hardware upgrades bring.
    Cheers to all.

    Hi 8400Help, I had compiled a list of suggestions in an earlier thread please check it out here: http://supportforums.blackberry.com/t5/BlackBerry-PlayBook/Future-Things-We-Want-Rim-To-Fix-On-The-P...

  • What's new in the next version of Premiere Pro?  Check it out!

    Here's some of what's coming up in the next version of Premiere Pro and AE.  Can't want to play with this!
    http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/creativecloud/cc/pd fs/nab2014-reveal-whats-new-for-pre-release-20140321.pdf?sdid=KLBWR
    Preview videos here: http://tv.adobe.com/watch/adobe-at-nab-2014/whats-new-in-premiere-pro-cc-nab-2014/
    Some awesome new stuff coming our way!
    Fingers crossed they also fixed Multicam editing (i.e. intelligent separate window UI).  I'll find out soon enough at NAB.

    Lots of great new things coming our way!
    However its seems that many basic improvements are still missing.  Here's the list of items I'll be going over with the Adobe reps at NAB.  See something missing in my list?  Feel free to share!
    Disappearing markers when track below a certain height (http://forums.adobe.com/message/6205015#6205015)
    all effects on/off toggle, especially to disable transitions while working with keyframes in the ECW (http://forums.adobe.com/message/6210552#6210552)
    'Source Clip: Next/Previous' not working in full screen mode (http://forums.adobe.com/message/6140378#6140378)
    Effect presets too easy to rename by mistake
    Auto color coding of clips with Warp stabilizer applied (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5946227#5946227)
    Project window tab name: just 'Project', nothing else (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5935706#5935706)
    Multicam angles in separate, full screen viewable window (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5934039#5934039 and http://forums.adobe.com/message/5931933#5931933)
    Pasting at cursor position instead of lowest active track (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5934219#5934219)
    Remove gaps function (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5946226#5946226)
    Intelligent tooltips that report info on individual clip or selection, depending on what's selected (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5934215#5934215)
    Constant rasterization of titles and Illustrator files (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5934211#5934211)
    Multiple Effects windows (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5929261#5929261)
    Default to first clip loaded in Source Monitor (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5909239#5909239)
    Sticky solo settings in Audio Meters window (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5908879#5908879)
    Smooth fades (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5901648#5901648)
    Prevent off screen changes (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5792648#5792648)
    Keep focus on Timeline when tilde toggling out of full screen mode (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5777794#5777794)
    Intelligent 'Nudge Clip Selection Down/Up' (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1267353?start=0&tstart=0)
    Keyboard shortcuts to apply transitions to CTI only (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5542185#5542185 and http://forums.adobe.com/message/5544651#5544651)
    PP windows wirelessly sent to tablet/smartphone (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5538217#5538217
    Drag/drop modified clips from Timeline to Project window (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5300065#5300065)
    Shift-toggle to restrict movement to up/down or left/right in Program monitor (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5293341#5293341)
    Smart Bins that auto collect certain asset types, such as titles
    Ability to move entire motion path as in AE (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5292523#5292523)
    Non-slipping keyframes in ECW (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5284322#5284322)
    Aesthetically correct rounded/clipped corners in Titler
    'Zoom to Keyframes' shortcut in ECW (http://forums.adobe.com/message/5192692#5192692)
    Consistently intelligent font lists across all CC programs (http://forums.adobe.com/message/4955178#4955178)
    Offscreen media overwrite warnings when moving a clip would overwrite content outside the viewable bounds of the Timeline (this would be an NLE first afaik)

  • Next Version

    I just hope I can get the next version of Bridge before all the apps in the Creative Suite are updated. Bridge has great potential and could really be a great app. I hope it's upgrade path is a little faster that Photoshop. Frankly Photoshop is beginning to become a little overloaded with features.
    I like the idea of Bridge a lot. It would be a great replacement for other browsers and some digital asset managers.

    please see a recent post in the JavaHelp interest mailing list:
    http://swjscmail1.java.sun.com/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0212&L=javahelp-interest&P=R3750&m=6174

  • "Cant use this version of mail with this version of Mac OS X"

    Hi all,
    Hope you can help.
    I have got a new hard disk the other day. Ran a copy from my Time Machine to bring my iMac back to my latest copy. Everything works except my mail program.
    Im told I have mail version 4.0 (1075/1076) and it cant be used with Mac version 10.6.1 (build 10B504)
    I have tried to look through my Snow Leopard installation disk but cant find the mail program so I could try to reinstall it.
    Am I looking the wrong place or do you have some other solution.
    Thanks in advance
    Thomas

    You should be able to find the SL version of Mail as follows:
    1. Insert the SL DVD in your optical drive. Locate the Optional Installs folder, double-click to open. Run the Optional Installs installer located inside. In Applications I believe you will find Mail. Check the box for it then click on the Install button. This will reinstall Mail.
    2. In case the above doesn't have Mail available for a separate installation then you can do the following:
    How to Use Pacifist to Replace Deleted or Missing OS X Components
    Insert the OS X Installer DVD into the optical drive. Use a simple utility like TinkerTool to toggle invisibility so you can see invisible items. Alternatively, open the Terminal application in your Utilities folder and at the prompt enter the following:
    defaults write com.apple.finder AppleShowAllFiles Yes
    Press RETURN.
    To turn off the display of invisible files repeat the above command substituting No for Yes.
    The install packages are located in the /System/Installation/ folder on the DVD.
    Download the shareware utility Pacifist from VersionTracker or MacUpdate. Use it to extract a fresh copy of the missing item(s) from the file archives on your OS X installation DVD. The file archives are in the /System/Installations/ folder (use Go to Folder option in the Go menu of the Finder.)
    Here are Four Basic ways to use Pacifist (courtesy of George Orville.)
    A. Drag a .pkg icon onto the Pacifist window .....proceed to step 7.
    B. Click on “Open Package ....” and navigate to package desired and click “Open” in the open/save window.....proceed to step 7.
    C. Insert Mac OS X installer CD and when it mounts, navigate to .... Menu->Go->Go to Folder.
    In the path field enter or paste ....
    /Volumes/disc name/System/Installation/Packages (where disc name is the name of the CD/DVD that you inserted.
    • Click on the "Go" button .....
    • Drag a .pkg to Pacifist..... proceed to step 7.
    The package you'll need will have to be discovered by trial and error, but for most applications you should start with the Essentials.pkg and/or Additional Essentials.pkg.
    D. Insert your Mac OS X install disk 1 .... and open Pacifist.
    1. In Pacifist, select "Open Mac OS X Install Packages" ... dialog may appear asking for disk 2, then disk 3 and finally disk 1 again.... {if DVD is not used)...If “Stop Loading” is selected...the procedure will stop!!!
    2a. When loading is complete, a new window appears, click the triangle to display contents of each package...Select item and proceed to step 7.
    2b. or click the “Find” icon in the Pacifist window and type the name of the software you need.
    3. In the list that comes back, click the top most entry for the item that you want. ..... that is the one for the English language.
    4. On the top of the Pacifist window, click “verify” .... you will probably be prompted for your password.
    5. Enter checks for.... “verify permissions” and “verify file contents.” and click “verify” ....enter password when prompted.... you will get back output which may look like this:
    20 files were scanned.
    20 of 20 files were present on the hard disk.
    0 of 20 files had file permissions that did not match those specified in the package.
    0 of 20 files had checksums that did not match those specified in the package.
    6. Click “close”. Go to step 7.
    Extract or Install........
    7. In the Toolbar (upper left), you now have the option to extract or install. Click a file in the lower list and those two icons will be enabled.
    8. If “Extract to...” is selected.... navigate to the location where the file will be placed, select “choose”, select “extract” in new dialog that appears,authenicate , if prompted, click “OK”.
    9. In the next dialog, click “Extract”.
    10. If “Install” is selected... dialog will appear with the location/path of the installed software. Click “Install”
    11. Type in your password, click “OK”
    • Pacifist will begin to extract files.
    12. In steps 8/10ß.... you also have the choice to “cancel”
    Notes.....
    • Pacifist may find that a file it is installing already exists on the hard disk. Pacifist will present you with an alert panel....
    Stop
    Leave original alone
    Update ..... Default selection
    Replace .... Replace option should only be used on full install packages

  • What's going to happen to all the iWeb hacks when the next version comes?

    When I refer to iWeb hacks in the title, I'm thinking of non-Apple software like "iWebsites" and "iWebenhancer".
    From reading this forum, I've already learned how to have multiple websites on iWeb by duplicating and copying the domain file to different folders in my computer, where I work on different websites separately.
    Now, I am thinking of getting "iWebenhancer" because I want to paste in some things, like "google adsense" and "youtube"/"Revver" video clips into my sites. HOWEVER, I am worried that all my hard work on my iWeb sites is going to get thrown out-of-wack when the next version of iWeb comes out early next year with iLife 2007 (I am presuming it will be released).
    What do other forum users think? I know it can be only speculation now, but still I'm curious to know if anyone else is pondering this.

    All of what you are saying is certainly possible. The next version of iWeb could potentially make all the workarounds that we do to edit HTML obsolete. To be sure, this is a net positive. But for those of us with more complex and more "post-processing" heavy sites, it will probably mean that we need to make some changes.
    From a purely speculative viewpoint, I'm going to guess that the next version of iWeb will make adding external HTML snippets via post-publishing unnecessary. This would probably mean that we will be able to put whatever code we want to add right into the iWeb workspace....maybe somewhat akin to how iWebEnhancer works....but all built into iWeb. So as far as retooling our websites, this would simply require a one-time "put all your external code into iWeb and make sure it works" overhaul.
    And I'm going to further speculate that the next version of iWeb may present us with many more desireable features....some that may make us want to abandon the way we do things now and possibly also abandon the very things that we strive to add to our sites today.... I'm thinking about more dynamic content with more user-interactivity. My point here is only that we might not mind the chance to overhaul our sites too much once we see the new features available to us.
    Maybe I'm hoping for too much, though. I don't know. Your guess is as good as mine.

  • Your feature requests for next version?

    I have submitted mine on the feedback page, but I would love to know what you all want the next version to include in terms of improvements and additional features.
    In short, my prefered additions would include:
    -Stack/collapse all in one keystroke
    -More adjustments (among them lens distortion and CA correction)
    -Speeeed
    -Panorama stitching
    -Networking, being able to share images
    Kjell Are Refsvik
    Norway

    I like and use Aperture a lot, but realistically is still a v1 program. So I am looking forward to v2. Here's my wish list ....
    1. Plug In suppport - Nik plug-in's etc.
    2. iLife suite integration without duplicating photos or relying on Automator
    3. Integration to FCP suite ..... since the photos are in a package!
    4. Ability to use Spotlight external to the package ... or get rid of the package and just move to either file/folder structure or go to an indexed "RDBMS" database (yes, holy wars on this one, I know)
    5. Burn archive of import, as a workflow element.
    Multiple aperture libraries selectable from the File dialog vs. preference and then quit/launch
    6. Span aperure library across drives
    7 Standard max/min/lozenge buttons on windows and fonts that an over 50 year old can read .... or adjust .... on today's 23" or 30" high res. displays.
    8. oh, and did somebody say .....
    S-P-E-E-D?
    speed
    SPEEEED
    9. ....but at least give us progress bars when say, moving photos from project to project
    10. Undo on deleting a project .... you're into re-importing from the Mac trash can after figuring out which photo you need (yup, I have the scars and wasted time award)
    11. Better visual representation of what's happening (or not) when trying to move photos across albums etc.
    Either give us full line camera RAW support, or DNG linear support, or a plug in capability.
    12. Overlay one photo on another in book view (tools to increase transparency/reduce saturation on the background photo to create a sense/theme)
    12. CURVES!! tool
    13. Loupe tool that will stay over the photo while I use the mouse to alter tool settings
    14. .... and Luddite that I am, I do still need a <Cmd>+ / <Cmd> - zoom function along with the loupe.
    Here endeth today's list. And my thanks to Joe and the Aperture development team in advance!

  • Can not run multiple firefox windows with version 4

    After the upgrade to FF4 the problem started happening. In ver 3 I used the profile manager and was able to run 2 firefox windows at the same time with no problems in Windows 7.
    Now when I try to do this with version 4, one firefox window errors out with 'firefox stopped working'
    I thought it was due to an incompatible add on or something, so I did a complete program removal, rebooted, cleaned the registry and removed all folders that firefox put on my system. The problem continues.

    You can only run multiple version at the same time if the next version is started with the -no-remote switch added to the command line in the desktop shortcut.
    "C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox XX\firefox.exe" -no-remote -P
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Opening_a_new_instance_of_Firefox_with_another_profile
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Using_multiple_profiles_-_Firefox

  • Old version of Mail after 10.6.7- .8 upgrade

    After upgrading from 10.6.7 to 10.6.8 Mail doesn't work; it says "You can't use this version of Mail with this version of Mac OS X"... that it is version 4.4. Not sure why the upgrade missed it... it also left quite a lot of apps unusable (that need Rosetta) but Mail is the important issue at the moment. I presume trying to reinstall Mail from the DVD (10.6.7) wouldn't help... I don't want to try things randomly because I would rather not loose the stored mail messages and settings. What should I do?  If Mail and Rosetta didn't upgrade properly does that mean I should suspect other things have gone wrong with the upgrade too?
    Thanks,
    Mark

    Thanks, the apps were in the  expected location, but applying the (v1.1) combo fixed the mail problem. I wonder if it had run out of disk space in the middle of the first combo update, or something temporary like that. The other problems are still going on though... I'll search other forum answers, but in case anyone has some quick ideas on them, they are:
    * iWork 9.0.3 continues to fail, even after re-installing (yet iWork 06 works ok).. crashes with a symbol not found (expected in SFArchiving library file that exists)
    * Old Microsoft Office executables, in fact everything that needs Rosetta, bring up a terminal window saying it tried to run the app as a script, I guess. Tried installing Rosetta from the optional section of the 10.6.7 install DVD - no warnings, but nothing seems to work.
    * iPhoto starts up but does nothing but spinning rainbow disk
    I realise the details of these problems are sketchy - will add more if needed and put into properly-named posts, but somebody might spot some common cause from the brief description. Perhaps some files should have been deleted prior to reinstalling? I have reinstalled iWork and Rosetta several times, eventually removing library files that looked related prior to re-installing.  Is there some utility to check if I have a "clean" reinstall? Do I have to downgrade to 10.6.7 somehow before reinstalling from DVD??

  • "Default email reader" shows 2 versions of Mail.app

    If I got to Preferences in Mail.app, the first drop down to select the "Default email reader" shows 2 versions of Mail to choose from: 2.1.1 & 3.0
    Any ideas why that is or how to remove the 2.1.1? Whenever I chose 3.0 and close the prefs and then open them again, it stays selection on 2.1.1

    Just discovered this on my Default Apps as well - though not just with Mail.
    I have apparently got Mail 2.1.1 and four (4) versions of Mail 3.0 in this menu. Also - four versions of Safari 3.0.4, one of 2.0.4, as well as five versions of Firefox 2.0.8 and one version of 2.0.7.
    It also things I have multiple numbered versions of Fetch, and VLC.
    Not sure what is going on with that, or why it's happening. I am having trouble with my Mail.app preferences repeatedly changing after I sync my machines across .mac. I'm wondering if this is another symptom and/or part of the problem.

Maybe you are looking for