Multiple Siebel Tool instance installed on same PC

Can we install multile Siebel Tools instance (Same version different versions) on the same PC. For example Siebel Tools 8.0.0.5, Siebel Tools 8.0.0.10, Siebel Tools 8.0.0.12.
This is required since 8.0.0.5 will be in Production which needs supports until the next release, but the development want to move to 8.0.0.10 for the next release.

We have done this.. We have two independent Siebel Environments for our two business divisions. One was on 7.7 the other on 7.8 and both were working on an upgrade to 8.1 (one to 8.1.1.3 and the other to 8.1.1.5). We were able to run all 4 version of tools on the same box.
In addition we have multiple dev environments in play so it got a bit more complex.
The previous post was spot on about installing in different directories and about the ODBC.
Right after you install the 1st client make sure you update the ODBC, otherwise it gets overwritten on the next client install.
And I would start with the lower versions first (i.e 7.7) before moving on to the newer version.

Similar Messages

  • Is there any version of Indesign that allows to open multiple instance at the same time

    I am using Indesign CS3 to generate the bulk reports automatically(programmatically) using Adobe indesign library . One of the key limitation to this tool is it allows to open only one instance at a time unlike word where multiple instances can be opened at the same time. Is there any adobe indesign too version desktop/server which allows to open multiple instances at the same time. Any help on is appreciated. Thanks.

    @PeterG
    You said "You might want to examine the End User Licensing Agreement (EULA) for  any prohibition against using these two instances at the same time with  the same license; the license does permit two installs for the same user  that are not used simultaneously." I thought that meant you had read the EULA. It's pretty unambiguous on that point.
    For everyone's edification about multiple installations and server use with a standard license here's the relevant text:
    2. Software License.
    If you obtained the Software and any required serial number(s) from Adobe or one of its authorized
    licensees and as long as you comply with the terms of this agreement, Adobe grants you a non-exclusive
    license to install and use the Software in a manner consistent with its design and Documentation and as
    further set forth below. See Section 16 for specific provisions related to the use of certain products and
    components, for example font software, Acrobat, After Effects, Adobe Presenter, Contribute, Adobe
    Device Central, Flash Player, Flash Builder, and Adobe Runtimes.
    2.1 Limited Use. The Software, or portions of the Software, may allow installation and use without a serial
    number. If so, you may install but not use such non-serialized Software on any number of Computers as
    part of an organizational deployment plan. Further, you may install and use such non-serialized Software
    on any number of Computers for demonstration, evaluation and training purposes only and only if any
    Output Files or other materials produced through such use are used only for internal, non-commercial and
    non-production purposes. You may not use such non-serialized Software after any applicable time-out
    period has ended, unless you input a valid serial number under Section 2.2. ACCESS TO AND USE OF
    ANY OUTPUT FILES CREATED WITH SUCH NON-SERIALIZED SOFTWARE IS ENTIRELY AT
    YOUR OWN RISK.
    2.2 General Use. You may install and use one copy of the Software only on the Permitted Number of your
    compatible Computers into which you enter a valid serial number.
    2.3 Distribution from Server. You may copy an image of the Software onto Computer file server(s) within
    your Internal Network for the purpose of downloading and installing the Software onto Computers within
    the same Internal Network for use as permitted by Section 2.1 and 2.2.
    2.4 Server Use. You may install the Software on Computer file server(s) within your Internal Network only
    for use of the Software initiated by an individual from a Computer within the same Internal Network only
    as permitted by Section 2.2. The total number of users (not the concurrent number of users) able to use the
    Software on such Computer file server(s) may not exceed the Permitted Number.
    By way of example, the foregoing does not permit you to install or access (either directly or through
    commands, data or instructions) the Software: (a) from or to a Computer not part of your Internal Network,
    (b) for enabling Web hosted workgroups or services available to the public, (c) by any individual or entity
    to use, download, copy or otherwise benefit from the functionality of the Software unless licensed to do so
    by Adobe, (d) as a component of a system, workflow or service accessible by more than the Permitted
    Number of users, or (e) for operations not initiated by an individual user (e.g., automated server
    processing).
    2.5 Portable or Home Computer Use. Subject to the important restrictions set forth in Section 2.6, the
    primary user of the Computer on which the Software is installed under Section 2.2 (“Primary User”) may
    install a second copy of the Software for his or her exclusive use on either a portable Computer or a
    Computer located at his or her home, provided that the Software on the portable or home Computer is not
    used at the same time as the Software on the primary Computer.
    2.6 Restrictions on Secondary Use by Volume Licensees. If the Software was obtained under an Adobe
    volume license program (currently known as Adobe Open Options) by any licensee other than an
    educational volume licensee, the second copy of the Software made under Section 2.5 must be used solely
    for the benefit and business of that volume licensee. For more information about secondary use by volume
    licensees, please visit our Web Site at http://www.adobe.com/go/open_options.
    There is also language stating that if you have a dual boot or other system capable of running more than one OS you will need a separate license for each platform if you want to run the software on more than one.

  • Multiple instances of the same bean class in session?

    I�m trying to think of a way to have multiple instances of the same bean class in session scope using JSF. For example, let�s say that I have two <h:dataTable>s on the same page. They both use the backing bean called genericBean. Now, the content for genericBean will be different for each <h:dataTable>. In fact, the data source that backs genericBean is not known until runtime. It could be a database, web service, etc.
    What I would like is for when JSF needs access genericBean instead of looking for the value with key �genericBean� in the session map it looks for �genericBean_[some runtime ID]�. I could specify this id in EL on a custom component, as a request parameter or whatever.
    I think that I need the bean to be in session scope because the tables are complex and I want them to be editable.
    I have some ideas about how I can do this but I was wondering if someone has already solved this problem or if there is a standard way to do this using tools like Shale, etc.
    Thanks,
    Randy

    Well, I came up with an interesting solution to this so I thought that I would post it here.
    I have a page that looks like this.
    <html>
    <head>
    <title>My Page</title>
    </head>
    <body>
    <f:view>
    <f:subview id="component1">
    <jsp:include page="component.jsp">
    <jsp:param name="id" value="a" />
    </jsp:include>
    </f:subview>
    <hr>
    <f:subview id="component2">
    <jsp:include page="component.jsp">
    <jsp:param name="id" value="b" />
    </jsp:include>
    </f:subview>
    </f:view>
    </body>
    </html>
    And component.jsp looke like this.
    <f:verbatim>
    <p>
    <h1>Component
    </f:verbatim>
    <h:outputText value=" #{param.id}" />
    <f:verbatim>
    </h1>
    </p>
    </f:verbatim>
    <h:form>
    <h:outputText value="#{component.id}" />
    <h:outputText value="#{component.value}" />
    <h:commandButton value="increment" action="#{component.increment}" />
    <h:commandButton value="decrement" action="#{component.decrement}" />
    <f:verbatim>
    <input type="hidden" name="id"
    value="</f:verbatim><h:outputText value="#{param.id}"/><f:verbatim>" />
    </f:verbatim>
    </h:form>
    The idea is that I want component.jsp to be initialized differently based on the id param. The component managed bean is configured to be in session scope but I want the component instance for id a and id b to be different instances in session scope. Therefore, I added a custom variable resolver to handle this.
    public Object resolveVariable(FacesContext context, String name) {
    // This id will be different for the different subviews.
    HttpServletRequest request = (HttpServletRequest) context.getExternalContext() .getRequest();
    String id = request.getParameter("id");
    // If there is an id in the request then check if this is a bean that can have multiple
    // instances in session scope.
    if ((id != null) && (id.length() > 0)) {
    ExternalContext ec = context.getExternalContext();
    // Build the new name for the key of this bean
    String newName = name + "_" + id;
    Object value = null;
    // See if the bean instance already esists.
    if ((null == (value = ec.getRequestMap().get(newName))) &&
    (null == (value = ec.getSessionMap().get(newName))) &&
    (null == (value = ec.getApplicationMap().get(newName)))) {
         // We could not find the bean instance in scope so create the bean
         // using the standard variable resolver.
    value = original.resolveVariable(context, name);
    // Now check if the bean implements that page component interface. If it is
    // a page component then we want to rename the key to access this bean so
    // that the instance is only used when the id is provided in the request.
    // For example, if there are two components (a and b) we will have in session scope
    // component_a and component_b. The will each point to a unique instance of the
    // Component bean class.
    if (value instanceof PageComponent) {
    // Try to get the value again
    if (null != (value = ec.getRequestMap().get(name))) {
         // Initialize the bean using the id
    ((PageComponent) value).initInstance(id);
    ec.getRequestMap().remove(name);
    ec.getRequestMap().put(newName, value);
    } else if (null != (value = ec.getSessionMap().get(name))) {
    ((PageComponent) value).initInstance(id);
    ec.getSessionMap().remove(name);
    ec.getSessionMap().put(newName, value);
    } else if (null != (value = ec.getApplicationMap().get(name))) {
    ((PageComponent) value).initInstance(id);
    ec.getApplicationMap().remove(name);
    ec.getApplicationMap().put(newName, value);
    return value;
    return original.resolveVariable(context, name);
    }

  • Stop opening multiple instances of the same application

    I am used to having graphic files on my desktop, when editing one I would simply right-click and pick "open with" > Photoshop (which is always open in its own desktop in my computer). Now out of the blue, if I do that, it loads another instance of Photoshop, which is certainly what I don't want. I can have 2, 3, 4 Photoshops running at the same time and editing the same image!
    Any idea how to solve this? I searched but all I could find is people wanting the opposite i.e. opening multiple instances of the same app.

    Your best bet to prevent this is to detach or unmount this drive; however, you can also try resetting your Mac's launch services, to have it re-scan only the Applications folders on your boot drive for programs to associate with documents and services you are using. Running the following command in the OS X Terminal will kill the current launch services database (its long, but copy and paste the entire line):
    /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/LaunchServices.framework/Versions/A/Support/lsregister -kill
    Following this, run the following command to seed the database with the apps you currently have installed:
    /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/LaunchServices.framework/Versions/A/Support/lsregister -seed
    Note that these changes will only apply when opening documents that have not been specifically assigned to a program. If you find a specific document continues to open the program on the external drive, then you can get info on it and change the associated program in the "Open With" section of the info window. After doing this, you might need to re-run these commands above, as opening the program will register it with OS X's launch services and have it now be available for automatically handling other documents.

  • Can one installation of SSIS be shared by multiple instances on the same physical box?

    Hello everyone, 
    I hope I'm posting this question on the correct forum. 
    We are short on money this year and we decided to purchase one physical system to represent Development and QA. 
    I am designing an architecture around my systems where I would have a two SQL Server Instances (2014, Enterprise Ed), one for each environment: 
    DVSV-ODS01\DEV
    DVSV-ODS01\QA
    The only possible problem is SSIS, which I cannot have multiple installations of SSIS on the same box.
    Is it possible to have the SSIS service serving the two SQL Server instances installed on the same physical box?
    Thanks for your help. 

    Not on the same physical box, but you can go with running say the QA environment on a Virtual Machine.
    E.g. the very free VirtualBox should do it. And then you can install two SSIS instances.
    You can even access them simultaneously this way.
    Arthur
    MyBlog
    Twitter

  • How to install several instances of the same application on a computer?

    Hej,
    I have an application in LV 2009, where I have created an installer. The installer installs to a directory called \Receiver relative to the Program Files directory. If I install this once to a computer, everything is OK.
    However, I want to install the same application twice on the same computer. There should be no conflicts between the two applications, since I can configure them to work on different directories and ports. But if I call the installer again, and selects another directory, nothing is installed and I get the message "Installation Summary - No software will be installed or removed". It seems like the installer ignores that I have selected another directory, and just uses the default directory, relative to the Program Files directory.
    Anyone knows the trick, how to install several instances on the same computer ?
    BR, Jan
    Jan Nielsen
    Freelance system analyst and LabVIEW programmer

    Hi Jan,
    This is so because each installer has a GUID that is used to check whether the application needs to be upgraded or not. (It's a Microsoft function).
    What you can do is create a new installer with a different GUID (copy the installer in the projects), and check witha  text editor whether this GUID has changed.
    But any specific reason you need two seperate installs? You can run the application twice with a specific INI token:
    allowmultipleinstances=True
    Ton
    Free Code Capture Tool! Version 2.1.3 with comments, web-upload, back-save and snippets!
    Nederlandse LabVIEW user groep www.lvug.nl
    My LabVIEW Ideas
    LabVIEW, programming like it should be!

  • IHAT multiple iAS instances in the same view.

    I have three iAS instances installed on the same node, the iHAT is also installed and running from the same node.
    iHAT Version: 10.1.3
    APPSERVERS:
    - INFRA - ORACLE_HOME01
    - MIDTIER#1 - Forms / Report - ORACLE_HOME02
    - MIDTIER#2 - Discoverer - ORACLE_HOME03
    I installed iHAT and started the JAVA server, (3 sessions on different ports. 8096, 8097 and 8098)
    Everything works well and i can monitor the application servers on the different ports from the web browser.
    Then over to my question, is it possible to monitor all three IAS servers from only one running iHAT view? And if so, how is this possible.
    Best regards,
    Roberth Steiner

    Yes.. I need to use different port and I could resolve by following steps
    There is a way in Oracle Application Server to achieve this. However, it requires a different installation type and additional configuration, Following are the steps that you need to take.
    a) Install Oracle Application Server with J2EE Server only option, this is in Advanced Installation, also, please select the option: Configure this as an Administration OC4J Instance.
    b) Access Oracle Application Server control console
    c) Create the OC4J instances, by default, it has a home instance, then you need create additional instances: say example placeagra, placeexcalibur.
    d) Stop Oracle Application Server.
    e) Edit [oracle-appserver-root]/opmn/conf/opmn.xml
    Replace OC4J instance placeagra's port definition for default-web-site
    from <port id="default-web-site" range="12501-12600" protocol="ajp"/> to <port id="default-web-site" range="8889" protocol="http"/>
    Replace OC4J instance placeexcalibur's port definition for default-web-site
    from <port id="default-web-site" range="12501-12600" protocol="ajp"/> to <port id="default-web-site" range="8890" protocol="http"/>
    f) Start Oracle Application Server
    g) Install your applications into these instances through application control console. (You can only use home's ascontrol)
    * This should work fine. If you go to [oracle-appserver-root]/opmn/bin directory, type "opmnctl status -l", you will see that you have multiple HTTP server services running, each with different port.
    * This is identical to Weblogic's set up, however, this is not recommended for production, since the embedded HTTP server in Oracle Application J2EE server is only for application management, just as weblogic.
    * You can only access application console through home's http server, since ascontrol application for other instances are always in down mode.

  • Multiple SOA instances run on Same Linux BOX

    Hi,
    Can multiple SOA installed be installed on same Linux box? Can someone pls answer this.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    it should be supported; It is just a new installation of SOA Suite into a new directory structure. Keep in mind that you need to have different databases to hold up the SOA Schema's. Note that from release 11g, you can have multiple SOA schema's into a single database instance.
    Marc

  • How can I open multiple instances of the same version of FF?

    I understand that if I have multiple profiles, I can run different versions of FF side-by-side (like 3.6 and 4).
    However, what I'm interested in is how I can launch multiple instances of the same version of FF (4, for instance) using the same profile. In other words, I want to be able to double-click the desktop icon for FF, and open a new instance, and keep doing that as many times as I want. I don't want to have a different icon and profile for each instance (too much overhead to keep a dozen+ profiles in sync).
    I can always launch one FF window instance, and then keep clicking ctrl+N to launch new instances from inside it, which they all share the same profile (as I want). So, basically, I want to be able to do that from my desktop icon, rather than by having to do it with the keyboard ctrl+N sequence.

    But I don't understand why whatever Firefox does when you click ctrl+N can't also be done (with some sort of command-line switch) from a desktop icon?
    In other words, I clearly can create many FF instances (even if they are the same FF.exe process) by doing ctrl+n a bunch of times. Why then can't this behavior be done from a desktop icon with some parameters?
    As far as I know, FF is the only browser that doesn't directly allow multiple browser instances from desktop icons. IE, Chrome, Safari, Opera, etc... all let me launch a new instance (even if they are all single process and the instances are shared within the process).

  • Multiple application instance on the same server instance

    Can we have multiple instances of the same application on a single WLS?? For ex, can I have two app.ear files in different application directories??
              

    Hi Nilesh,
    Can you please clarify your landscape as this will help in getting answers to your question.
    In general adding instances (and/or server nodes) should be considered for increasing capacity rather than impoving performance. Specifcially, adding instances (and/or server nodes on the same host you risk a situation where the processes compete for resources which will have a negative effect on performance. If you do need to combine instances on the same host, make sure there is enough hardware (specifically memory in case of JAVA).
    Hope this helps,
    Best regards, Walter

  • Multiple Portal instances on the same machine

    Hi  Forum,
    we have a requirement where in we are asked to implement multiple instances of Portal on the same machine. can you please give me some detials on Feasibility , issues and limitations of having multiple Portal instances on the same machine , different instances pointing to different tiers(Dev, Test, Production) etc
    pointers will be highly appreciated..
    regards,
    uday

    Hi Uday,
       Please look at this.
    Multiple Portal Instances - Virtual Hosting
    Regards,
    Siva
    P.S: Award points if you find this useful.

  • Cant open external links and multiple instances of the same profile.

    I have multiple firefox profiles.
    I constantly have two profiles running at the same time.
    I use microsoft outlook and see an external link, I click it wishing firefox to open it in the default or new browser. It does not and says "FIrefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system."
    Firefox is running fine.
    How can I open external links with a profile based setup?
    Also, how can I open multiple instances of the same profile? I find that if I click and drag a tab to another monitor, it opens a new "instance" or browser window.

    You say
    ''I have multiple firefox profiles. <br />
    I constantly have two profiles running at the same time. ''
    So you will have discovered ''-no-remote'' Note NOT to use that on the default browser; profile, only on secondary profiles.
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_in_use#Common_causes
    You will NOT be able to open multiple instances of the same profile, clone the profile if necessary.
    If you are trying to run multiple Webmail accounts in one profile then you may well find the webmail is identifying and setting the user account that is opened. Use a Private Browsing window to get round that and open a second account.
    * [[Private Browsing - Browse the web without saving information about the sites you visit]]

  • Multiple instances of the same entity bean?

    I am designing a J2EE application that is made up of a number of separate components that each have a well-defined responsibility. Each component is made up of one or more J2EE components (web clients and EJBs). I want to design the application such that it is easy in the future to deploy each component (or a group of components) on different servers. In order to do this I need to make sure that the interfaces between each component are exposed as remote interfaces (but I will use local interfaces inside each component). However, there are a number of entity beans that need to be accessed by more than one component. I am wondering how best to expose these entity beans. I believe there are a number of options:
    1. Expose remote interfaces on each of the shared entity beans. The disadvantage of this approach is that it is inefficient and that I will not be able to take advantage of container managed relationships. (I am intending to use container managed persistence.)
    2. Create a facade object (stateful session bean) for each of the entity beans which exposes a remote interface and in turn accesses the shared entity beans locally. The disadvantage of this approach is that I have to create some extra EJBs and that I cannot directly make use of container managed relationships etc from the client component.
    3. I don't know if this is an option but I am wondering whether I can deploy a copy of each shared entity bean with each application component. The advantage of this approach is that the component would access the entity locally and could make use of container managed relationships. However, I don't know what the issues are with having more than one instance (per primary-key) of an entity in the same application. I don't know whether this would cause errors of whether they would get out of sync (because different instances with the same primary key would be updated by different clients). Initially each component would be deployed in the same server but later they would be deployed in different servers. In both cases with this option each component (JAR) would have copies of the shared entity bean classes.
    Any suggestions as to the best approach and whether the last option is feasible would be much appreciated.
    Thanks.

    I think 2 beats 1. The main reason being to minimise the number of network calls. You're basically asking, are fascades a good idea? and the answer is yes.
    You can obviously do 3 in different app servers. However you'll need to configure your app servers so they can handle the fact that they're not the only ones updating the database. This is to handle concurrency as you mentioned. How you do this will depend on your app server and will affect performance, but shouldn't be a problem.
    I think you should definately decide up front what's going in different app servers, I dunno if 3 would work in the same app server.
    Why do you would want to use multiple app servers?
    Why not have everything in the same app?
    Is is just the 1 database?
    You can use clustering for scalability.

  • How to find out multiple instances of the same application

    Hi,
    Please help me with your Java Networking expertise.
    Is there any way you could suggest where we could know how many instances of the same application is running in a network ?
    Sending a UDP packet would require to specify the destination of the machine's IP address.
    But when the same application is installed in two different machines, at run time both the instances should be able to communicate dynamically. Is there any way I can send a signal(packet) that should be picked up by the other application instance ? Both the machine are in the same network.
    Thanks,
    Deb

    I guess there are many ways to do it. One simple way would be to broadcast a mesage whenever an instance starts up. Other running instances can then communicate back to it.

  • How do I relink multiple instances of the same image, in Illustrator CC?

    Is there a feature, like InDesign, where links automatically relink if they're in the same folder?
    Currently I have to search through the file structure multiple times even if the linked image is the same.
    Surely Illustrator should relink all instances of the same image and give the option search for any additional missing links in the same folder?
    I'd love to be pointed in the right direction, or if anyone has a script they've written to solve the problem, do let me know.
    Cheers

    try the script (version 3) in this post,
    Remember last folder location lost with Mac Lion updates

Maybe you are looking for