Multiple SIM instances on same db - disable Active Sync for one?

Hello. I am trying to set up two instances of Identity Manager that are running on the same machine and are connected to the same database.
I want one to be doing the Active Sync provisioning and the other to not.
Is there a way to disable Active Sync resources from starting up on one instance but not the other? I know I can manually start them, but I'd like the Active Sync resources to automatically start up for one of the servers.
I am using -Dwaveset.hostname and setting it to a different value for each instance.
Thanks.

957354 wrote:
Hi Laxman,
If its a testing purpose its ok to have a one oracle_home and single listener for multiple DB. One problem when applying oracle patches for one of the instances running in a multiple DB running then you need to bring all the DB running in that host since the oracle_home is sharing between all db instances.
Thanks
Sunil Rajesh K.C.Starting with 11g, patchset updates are full installs and done into a new home. This makes it possible to migrate one instance at a time. However, your point would be a consideration for one-off patches like CPUs.
However, please note ... OP --- PLEASE NOTE even with multiple oracle homes, you still only need a single listener.

Similar Messages

Can I block or disable Bookmarks Sync on one computer later, after setting it up?

If I set up synchronisation for bookmarks etc for several computers with an account on the Firefox server, can I later block or disable sync for one of the computers without having to remove the program option altogether from my browser? I presume I can(?) uninstall it altogether if I don't want it later??
A related question -- can I set up to sync different things for different computers?

1. Give her a separate user account on your computer. If you have a backup copy of the library, you can restore it.
2. If you encounter a 90-day waiting period, click here and ask the iTunes Store staff if they'll remove it.
(125941)

Disable file sync for team

Does anyone know if it is possible to disable file sync for my team?

You can do this on the mac by creating a managed preference file and publish this out by profile manager and or other methods such as Munki.
The preference file that handles this is com.adobe.accmac.plist. and the key is called AHPreferenceEnableSync set to Boolean type.
Your users will think that they can turn this feature on but the result is it will fail to load the file sync window and nothing will sync. Below is what the preference should look like after modifying it. If you don't know much about managing preferences please take the time and learn the basics. If you have questions just let me know.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
<plist version="1.0">
<dict>
<key>AHPreferenceEnableSync</key>
<false/>
</dict>
</plist>

Multiple AIA instances on same Linux box

H,
Can multiple SOA instances be deployed on same linux box then with AIA on top of it.
Can some one pls answer this?
Regards,
Rakesh

Yes you can but:
Each SOA installation must be in his own ORACLE_HOME directory.
Each AIA installation must be in his own ORACLE_HOME directory.
You must point to different databases. You can not have mulitple SOA schema's in one sinlge database.
Marc
http://orasoa.blogspot.com

Multiple AIA instances on same server?

Hi,
Does anyone know how to install multiple AIA instances on the same SOA server? The installer hints that this might be possible, although I have not seen how this is done because the installer expects an empty oracle home path. The only information I have found so far is for an earlier 2.x release of AIA and that suggested:
"Each SOA installation must be in his own ORACLE_HOME directory.
Each AIA installation must be in his own ORACLE_HOME directory.
You must point to different databases. You can not have mulitple SOA schema's in one sinlge database."
Is this true?
Thanks,
Kev.

957354 wrote:
Hi Laxman,
If its a testing purpose its ok to have a one oracle_home and single listener for multiple DB. One problem when applying oracle patches for one of the instances running in a multiple DB running then you need to bring all the DB running in that host since the oracle_home is sharing between all db instances.
Thanks
Sunil Rajesh K.C.Starting with 11g, patchset updates are full installs and done into a new home. This makes it possible to migrate one instance at a time. However, your point would be a consideration for one-off patches like CPUs.
However, please note ... OP --- PLEASE NOTE even with multiple oracle homes, you still only need a single listener.

Multiple DMVPN Instances on Same WAN Interface

Hi Folks,
Is it possible to run Multiple DMVPN Instances on a single WAN Interface ? Can we for example configure 3 Tunnels on a Router using one same WAN Interface but running separate EIGRP Instances for each Tunnel ? Kindly let me know , Alioune

Hi Alioune,
Yes you can create DMVPN as you said with one WAN interface that is possible..... you can have multiple tunnel interfaces pointed to a WAN interface as the source interface which resides in public zone..... with different public ip's as the destination tunnel...
interface Tunnel1
description ** A-VPN Tunnel **
bandwidth 100000
ip vrf forwarding red
ip address 10.0.252.2 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip mtu 1500
load-interval 60
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 (WAN Interface)
tunnel destination 1.1.1.1
tunnel protection ipsec profile dmvpn
interface Tunnel1
description ** B-VPN Tunnel **
bandwidth 100000
ip vrf forwarding red
ip address 10.0.252.5 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip mtu 1500
load-interval 60
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 (WAN Interface)
tunnel destination 2.1.1.1
tunnel protection ipsec profile dmvpn
like the above..... shown sample...
Please rate if the given information helps!!!

Multiple browser instances receiving same session ID

I am using Firefox with OC4J, and I've discovered that multiple simultaneous instances of the browser are receiving the same session ID. This is a pretty serious problem I beleive, as it prevents the ability to safely store one browser instance's state information safely in the session. In other words, one browser instance's behavior can stomp on another browser instance's state data.
Does anyone know what criteria OC4J is using to determine session IDs, and whether to create a new session or deliver an existing one?
Thanks,
Brad

Tugdual,
Another comment -- the case where the cookie does not exist or is expired isn't the problem. The problem is when the cookie is valid and another browser instance is opened. Since the browser instances access the same cookie, you have no way of knowing on the server side that you are actually talking to two different browser instances. Hence, any storage of state information that is contextual has the potential to be stomped on by the other browser instances.
In my case, one browser instance (the result of a new window spawn in a UIX page) was knocking over the original window, because it was overwriting some important state infomration.
Brad

Multiple dialog instances on same host for different System

Dear Sir,
I install two dialog instances on same host ,one for DEV one for QAS.
First I install dialog instance for DEV and startup with no error.
Second dialog instance for QAS install with success end ,but can not start dispatchers.
Service
sapmsDEV     3600/tcp     # SAP System Message Port
sapmsQAS     3601/tcp     # SAP System Message Port
sapdp01s 4701/tcp # SAP System Dispatcher Security Port
sapgw01s 4801/tcp    # SAP System Gateway Security Port
sapdp00       3200/tcp     # SAP System Dispatcher Port
sapdp00s 4700/tcp # SAP System Dispatcher Security Port
sapgw00       3300/tcp # SAP System Gateway Central Instance Port
sapgw00s 4800/tcp # SAP System Gateway Security Port
Disp_dev
***LOG Q0I=> NiPConnect2: SiPeekPendConn (10061: WSAECONNREFUSED: Connection refused) [nixxi.cpp 8716]
ERROR => MsIAttachEx: NiBufConnect to sap-qas/sapmsQAS failed (rc=NIECONN_REFUSED) [msxxi.c      633]
***LOG Q0L=> DpLoopInit, nomscon () [dpxxdisp.c   1549]
Stderr
D:\usr\sap\QAS\D01\work>ntscmgr start MSSQLSERVER -m sap-qas
failure: StartService, NT ErrorMessage: An instance of the service is already running. StartService SUCCESS
D:\usr\sap\QAS\D01\work>ntscmgr start SQLSERVERAGENT -m sap-qas
failure: StartService, NT ErrorMessage: An instance of the service is already running. StartService SUCCESS
It seem that first startup dialog instance already start MSSQLSERVER -m sap-dev and SQLSERVERAGENT -m sap-dev, so next instance can not start again ,and cause NICONN_REFUSED.
Could someone help me?
Thanks
Regards,
Matt

It appears to be possible, at least in IDM 7.1
The release notes and Installation guide reference a setting called waveset.serverId that you set in your application server startup script like so:
-Dwaveset.serverId=Name
This would allow each JVM to identify itself differently from any others running on the same physical server.
I haven't tried this yet myself, so caveat emptor.
Jason

Multiple DataTargets in the Same BI 7.0 System to One DataSource

Currently, I do not have access to BI 7.0 system. I am wondering whether it is possible to connect MULTIPLE DataTargets of a single BI 7.0 system to ONE DataSource in the source system? I have searched the forum, but I couldn't find relevant posts. If I am not wrong, until BW 3.5, once a DataSource is assigned to an InfoSource, it can not be assigned to any other InfoSource of the same BW system. I have heard that this has changed in BI 7.0 with the new DataFlow concept.
The current requirement is that multiple DataTargets of a single BI system need to get DELTA data from the same DataSource in the source system. If this is technically possible in BI 7.0, should the source system also support such an assignment (since the DELTA load timestamps are maintained in the source system)? What source systems currently support this feature, if any? What are the appropriate tables in the source system that I need to look at to do further investigation?
All the useful inputs regarding these questions will be rewarded with points. Thanks!
Sameer

Currently, I do not have access to BI 7.0 system. I am wondering whether it is possible to connect MULTIPLE DataTargets of a single BI 7.0 system to ONE DataSource in the source system?
Yes, it is possible.
Transformations and DTP's are Source - Target specific.
The current requirement is that multiple DataTargets of a single BI system need to get DELTA data from the same DataSource in the source system. If this is technically possible in BI 7.0, should the source system also support such an assignment (since the DELTA load timestamps are maintained in the source system)?
Data is extracted into PSA from the sourcesystem and is taken from there to different targets connected using diff transformations. If the datasource works on timestamp then it all depends on how the data is transformed to diff targets from PSA.
What source systems currently support this feature, if any?
ECC, irrespective of sourcesystem it all depends on how the datasource functions as data is only extracted till PSA.
What are the appropriate tables in the source system that I need to look at to do further investigation?
Datasource properties - ?? ROOSOURCE...

How to disable iCloud sync for a single app/game

Since I bought the infinity blade game for it, I have a problem. Normally, both my sons play games one on my iphone and the other on the ipad, Now, we found the game syncing without us telling it to over iCloud and both the devices behave as if the game continues from the previous player on the last played device.
Going through all the menus in icloud settings, there does not seem to be an easy way of disabling the game from syncing apart from disable all apps from syncing meaning all my Pages and Numbers documents wont sync.
I did try the game and the game forums itself, which does not have any way to disable icloud sync.
Both devices run the latest iOS and game updates. Can anyone help please.

Your client needs their own Apple Developer account.

Can IdM use TimeStamp files in its Active Sync for Database table ?

I have an IdM 7.1 implementation that I inherited
and have a Database Table resource adapter with Active Sync.
Here's a few ways to set up Active Sync, but I want to explore the latter.
-Static Search Predicate (clause)
You can use a flag (column) in your data table. Does not require any mapping, and presumably whatever process you're kicking off would turn off the flag, so the record is not picked up subsequently.
-Last Fetched Predicate (documented in the Resource Reference, under Database Table),
Normally, you'd be doing a comparison based on timestamps, and the mapping between a timestamp-User Extended Attribute AND timestamp-Database Column
In this implementation, I do not see a User Extended Attribute (UXA) but I do see a 0 byte timestamp file on the server. Did not see anything like this discussed in the docs, but my hypothesis is that this is being used, or has been configured somehow. I wonder if I am right ?
Let's call it 'MyTS'
I see MyTS both in ActiveSync logs, as well as in the 'XML Data' object, resource_SYNC, that A/S creates. Maybe this is a hidden feature, or mostly undocumented, or from an earlier version. Anyone care to offer a suggestion or explanation ? Your thoughts would be welcome.
thanks

'MyTS' would be a resource attribute. Have a look in the schema map for your resource.
It doesn't need to be, and would not normally be, a user extended attribute.

Multiple IDM instances on same host

Can multiple Identity Manager app server instances be run on the same host, connecting to the same db? If so, how is this accomplished. From what I see Identity Manager instances attempt to register themselves using the host name. Is there a property in the properties file that can set a unique name?

It appears to be possible, at least in IDM 7.1
The release notes and Installation guide reference a setting called waveset.serverId that you set in your application server startup script like so:
-Dwaveset.serverId=Name
This would allow each JVM to identify itself differently from any others running on the same physical server.
I haven't tried this yet myself, so caveat emptor.
Jason

Multiple WL instances on same machine with multiple clusters

Hi,
          I am wondering if it is possible to run two separate instances of WL on a
          single machine, with each instance belonging to a separate cluster? The
          machines are not multi-homed, so each instance must listen on a separate
          port.
          Our current architecture looks like this:
          4 web servers running NSAPI WL plug-in
          3 app. server boxes running WL 5.1 SP2
          I would like to start multiple instances of WL on each app. server to better
          utilize the hardware, and would like each instance to be part of a separate
          cluster.
          My questions are:
          1. Do I have to have a separate multicast address for each cluster, or can
          I use the same address since the clusters are on different ports?
          2. In the NSAPI plug-in, you simple specify a list of all the servers for a
          cluster. Are there any issues with having the machine/port names in this
          list belonging to different clusters?
          Thanks,
          Bob


Comments inline.
          Cheers - Wei
          www4.weblogic.com <[email protected]> wrote in message
          news:[email protected]...
          > Hi,
          >
          > I am wondering if it is possible to run two separate instances of WL on a
          > single machine, with each instance belonging to a separate cluster? The
          > machines are not multi-homed, so each instance must listen on a separate
          > port.
          Yes, you can. FYI, in addition, each cluster use different multicast
          address.
          >
          > Our current architecture looks like this:
          >
          > 4 web servers running NSAPI WL plug-in
          > 3 app. server boxes running WL 5.1 SP2
          >
          > I would like to start multiple instances of WL on each app. server to
          better
          > utilize the hardware, and would like each instance to be part of a
          separate
          > cluster.
          >
          > My questions are:
          >
          > 1. Do I have to have a separate multicast address for each cluster, or
          can
          > I use the same address since the clusters are on different ports?
          Different multicast addresses.
          >
          > 2. In the NSAPI plug-in, you simple specify a list of all the servers for
          a
          > cluster. Are there any issues with having the machine/port names in this
          > list belonging to different clusters?
          In-memory replication will not work.
          >
          > Thanks,
          > Bob
          >
          >
          >

Bug - multiple related instances of same class

We've discovered a rather subtle bug in the process by which Kodo
searches for reachable related objects to persist. If an instance of a
PC class (A) has two relationships to the same PC class (B), and both
related instances of B have the same value for their PK-field, then only
one of the related instances of B will be persisted.
Obviously, this problem only occurs in the context of application
identity. We've only encountered it when all the instances involved are
newly created and being made persistent for the first time (else the
instances would have different PK-values). It should also be noted that
we're assigning PK-values in jdoPreStore(). Here's the specific
situation we encountered:
Class A has two relationships to class B, represented by fields "B b1"
and "B b2". In our case, A.b1 is the many-side of a bidirectional
one-to-many relationship; the one-side is implemented by a field "List
aList" in B. A.b2 is the navigable side of a unidirectional
relationship; there is no corresponding field in B. (We haven't checked
whether or how the cardinality or navigability of the relationships
affects the problem.)
Let "a1" be the sole instance of A. If a1.b1 is set to an instance of B
but a1.b2 is null, and makePersistent( a1 ) is called, then a1 and b1
are persisted correctly and the relation field b2_id in TableA is NULL.
However, if a1.b2 is set to a second instance of B and both instances of
B have the same initial value of their PK-field, then a.b2 is not
persisted. Only one record is added to TableB; it corresponds to A.b1.
Interestingly, in this case the relation field b2_id in TableA is not
NULL, but has the default value of b2's PK-field. jdoPreStore() is not
called on b2 and b2 is not persisted, but its PK-field is read in the
process of persisting a1.
Since we've placed the jdoPreStore() callback in a common non-persistent
adapter superclass, we're currently able to work around the problem with
a static "seed" PK value that is incremented in the superclass default
constructor to provide a unique initial value for each PK-field. If
anyone would like the code for this approach we'll post it, although
it'll become unnecessary when the problem is fixed.
Jerry Pulley
Sr. Developer
Commerce Technologies, Inc.

I'm curious what behavior, besides throwing an exception, could even be
possible. If the pm discovers two object with the same id, it seems that it
has to choose one of them to make persistent. How could it possibly resolve
differences in the fields of the two instances in deciding which one is the
correct one to put in the db? Additionally, allowing this behavior could
lead to subtle, difficult to detect bugs in your program, since ( as Abe
points out ) JDO promises that there will only be one instance of an object
with a given primary key per PM. Other code may make decisions based on
this expectation ( like refreshing one of the objects after making a change
in a different PM ), that would lead to problems for code still hanging on
to the second instance.
IMHO, it should throw an exception.
-Eric
"Abe White" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Thanks for the bug report! However, I'm not entirely sure that this is a
bug (at least not the bug you think it is); either way it's an extremely
interesting case. The reason I say it might not be a bug is thatassigning
pk values in jdoPreStore seems suspect.
We know that a single PM cannot at any time contain multiple instances
with the same oid value, app id or otherwise. This is obvious from the
getObjectById method -- only one object can have a particular oid.
We also know that jdoPreStore is called only for instances managed by a
PM (duh!).
Thus it should not be possible to see a case where jdoPreStore is
called for 2 objects with the same initial oid.
Now, I realize that when you're dealing with persistence-by-reachability
things become less clear. However, I think the general point stands: at
the time that the objects are made persistent they all must have unique
oid values, and objects must be made persistent before jdoPreStore is
called.
Technically we could get around this. The current
persistence-by-reachability algorithm is something like:
flushed = {}
while flushed.size < persistent.size:
for each persistent instance:
if instance not in flushed:
instance.jdoPreStore // may persist more instances
instance.persistFirstClassFields // may persist more too
flushed += instance
In sum this is a breadth-first method of persisting relations. It could
be changed to a depth-first system instead of persisting all first class
fields each one is persisted and then immediately the algorithm is
repeated for that object before the other fields are touched. However,
this seems like it might lead to other unexpected behavior.
Generally, it just seems like waiting till jdoPreStore to assign the oid
of an object seems like a bad idea. I think the real bug is that Kodo is
not throwing an exception as soon as 2 object with the same oid are
detected (currently it just lets one overwrite the other in the cache,
which results in the behavior you see).
Does anyone else have an opinion on this? I'm certainly not fixed on my
interpretation of things; if you disagree I'd be very interested in
hearing other arguments.

Multiple Application Instances Accessing Same DAQ Device

I have a fairly straightforward application that reads from a wireless DAQ device (NI-9205 connected to NI WLS-9163). I'd like to run multiple instances of the executable, but I get error -201105 (resource reserved) when the DAQmx task is started on the second instance. Each instance is attempting to acquire from different channels from the same DAQ device. Is this an issue with the DAQ device in particular, or with DAQmx in general? Thanks.
-Joe
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Joe,
Unfortunately you can only access one type of channel with each program. For example you could have one program access AI and another use AO, but you cannot have two different programs access AI from the same card. This is common among all of NI DAQ devices.

Multiple SIM instances on same db - disable Active Sync for one?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for