Multiple Users CANNOT access folders

I recently created multiple users on my IMAC G4 (10.3.9). The additional users CAN access applications when logged in to their individual accounts. They CANNOT create new folders or access USB drives. The new folder command is dimmed. Recommendations?
Thanks!

Hi Appleallie, and a warm welcome to the forums!
From the Account that can, in the Finder, do a Get info on the places/locations/drives that the others cannot access/ create in, report the 3 Permissions at the bottom.

Similar Messages

Windows 7 pro client cannot access folders on server 2003 domain server

I added a windows 7 64 bit client to a server 2003 32 bit domain 3 weeks ago and file sharing was working fine until today, 5/4/12. Now, when trying to access shared folders that reside on the server,
I get the following "access denied" message:
[…folder…] is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions.
The user name could not be found.
Strangely enough...
The windows 7 client
can open shared folders that reside on the XP clients in the domain
All the XP clients in the domain can access the server 2003 folders
All the XP clients and the server 2003 machine can access shared folders and printers on the windows 7 client.
The windows 7 client can ping the server 2003 machine and vice versa
I can “see” the server in my network list, but when I click on it, I get the same “access denied” message listed above.
So... the only problem is that the windows 7 client cannot access folders that reside on the windows server 2003 machine. There must be some sharing setting that got changed
by a recent windows update.
Here is what I have done/verified so far on the windows 7 client:
In advanced sharing settings for Home/Work, Public and Domain profiles:
network discovery is enabled
file and print sharing is enabled
use user accounts and passwords to connect to other computers is selected (I also tried allowing windows to manage homegroup connections instead, but the problem remained.)
40 -56 bit encryption is enabled
In “gpedit.msc” Local Policies/Security Settings:
enabled the following policies:
Network access: Allow anonymous SID/name translation
Network access: Let Everyone permissions apply to anonymous users
disabled the following policies:
Network access: Restrict anonymous access to Named Pipes and Shares
Network access: Do not allow anonymous enumeration of SAM accounts
Network access: Do not allow anonymous enumeration of SAM accounts and shares
What am I missing? Are there policies on the server that need to be adjusted?
Please help! My business is crippled if I cannot access server files from this workstation. Thank you in advance.

As this thread has been quiet for a while, we assume that the issue has been resolved. At this time, we will mark it as ‘Answered’ as the previous
steps should be helpful for many similar scenarios.  <o:p></o:p>
If the issue still persists and you want to return to this question, please reply this post directly so we will be notified to follow it up. You
can also choose to unmark the answer as you wish.  <o:p></o:p>
In addition, we’d love to hear your feedback about the solution. By sharing your experience you can help other community members facing similar
problems.  <o:p></o:p>
Thanks!<o:p></o:p>
Arnav Sharma | http://arnavsharma.net/ Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading
the thread.

User cannot access redirected Documents folder, but can connect to share in Windows Explorer and access folder on server

I am in the final stages of a cross-forest migration. Users have Windows 7 workstations with redirected folders on a Windows Server 2012 box running in the old forest. User accounts were not migrated. The accounts in use have always
been in the "new" forest. One of our challenges was the large volume of data in redirected folders. I made sure users in the target forest had continued to have access to their redirected folders in the old forest and robocopied
the entire users share, copying the permissions with the files. By doing incremental robocopies, we can get a final copy done now in about six hours. The plan was simple: copy the files, do an incremental copy every night, on the night of the cutover
change the folder redirection policy Documents path from
\\oldserver\users\%USERNAME% to
\\newserver\users\%USERNAME%. The policy is configured to NOT copy user files from the existing folder to the new redirected folder. Everything was going well until I tested the policy change. After the folder redirection policy is updated
and applied, the user cannot access the private Documents folder. For example, user Chester Tester logs on as ctester. I open Windows Explorer and click the Documents shortcut. I see one subfolder, which is subfolder of Public Documents.
So I can look at Public Documents but when I click on the Documents folder (Under the Documents library link) I get an access denied error. Now for the kicker, if I open another Windows Explorer window and edit the address bar to
\\newserver\users\ctester, I can navigate the Documents folder tree and see my thousands of documents. What the ....?
I'm hoping this is something really simple to fix!
TIA

HI Vivian,
Thank you for your reply. Yes, the path in Group Policy Folder Redirection Root Path was updated to
\\NEWSERVER\users. I had planned to point this to the distributed file system, so the first used was actually
\\domain\dfs\users. To simplify things I have backed off to copying to just a normal share
\\newserver\users.
We are using BASIC folder redirection and we create a folder for each user under the root path.
We did not want the policy to move content, as we were seeing users requiring 15-20 minute logon times (or higher) after the policy is changed.
Grant the User exclusive right to Documents - Disabled
Move the contents of Documents to the new location - Disabled
Related folder settings
Video - Follow Documents
Music - Follow Documents
Pictures - Follow Documents
Now when I change the folder redirection from old server to new server I now have TWO My Documents folders in the user's redirection folder on the server. The redirected Documents points to an empty folder set. The copied folders with all user
data are there, but folder redirection refuses to recognize the original folder.
I am looking at the full view of the folder, nothing hidden, so I'm wondering how a folder can have two subfolders with the exact same name. For now, I just want the redirection to move from the old server to the new server properly. I deleted
the new My Documents folder, rebooted the user's workstation and tried again. The behavior repeats itself, i.e., a new My Documents folder is always created when the redirection policy is changed from the old server to the new server. The environment
has about 1500 users with approximately 1.3TB of data in the redirected Documents folders. OUCH!

User cannot access

hi,
i am new to this forum,i have one doubt,
user cannot access one authorization field , how can i analysis this issue, i know su 53 for find the authorization field...but user have 100 roles... how can i find the which role and object...plz help me..

Hi Hassan,
This is not the correct category. This message should be opened under security item. However, you can find the whole required authorization objects list, by using ST01 trace.
Best regards,
Orkun Gedik

Non-admin user cannot access Essbase server level variables

Version 11.1.1.3
Essbase Substitution variables are created at server level. Users are getting error in FR report that uses the Subsitution Variable -- Essbase Error(1051085): You do not have sufficient access to get this substitution variable. Also, users cannot access Substitution variable in SmartView. However, users can access variables created at database level. Users are provisioned as "Server Access" to Essbase and filter access to ASO application "MGTRPTG", where MGTRPTG is an ASO essbase application for reporting. We tried the same provisioning in two other environments and it seems to be working fine.
User is type "Essbase and Planning" provisioned with essbase "server access", application mgtrptg "filter", Reporting and Analysis "analyst", "dynamic viewer" and "Explorer". In addition, it is given a filter "REP_DME_GALB" which restricts 2 dimensions (Division and Geography).
Steps taken to resolve:
1. Existing users were deprovisioned and reprovisioned with no effect.
2. Created brand new identically provisioned users in Prod and QA. QA user can access the server level var and Prod user cannot
3. Created a brand new server level variable in Prod and this cannot be accessed.
4. All services have already been restarted several times.
5. SR has been opened.
Temporary workaround:
By creating a duplicate of the same set of variables at the database level, the reports work. This can only be a temporary workaround as the client cannot be expected to maintain two sets of substitution variables since there are 3 applications using these server level variables.
Thank you for any ideas!
Jennifer

You have stumbled on a defect which is resolved in the Hyperion Planning 9.3.1 patch 6 and above. If you have your planning preferences set to indent members it will cause forms which have page selections to show as invalid in SmartView.
You can either patch Planning or turn off the preference. The patches are available from http://metalink3.oracle.com and require account which has been associated with your client ID.
P.S. Usually it's not a good practice to use the admin id.
Regards,
-John
Edited by: Jbooth on Nov 3, 2008 2:12 PM

Users cannot access removable devices after you enable and then disable a Group Policy setting in Windows 7 64 Bit

Users cannot access removable devices after you enable and then disable a Group Policy setting on Windows 7 64 bit machines.
on the 32 bit machines I was able to apply this hotfix
http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2738898
But it will not install on 64 bit machines.
Is there a hotfix for 64 bit? If not, what is the work around?
Thanks!
Robert

Select "Show hotfixes for all platforms and languages", then download x64 hotfix:
Please take a moment to Vote as Helpful and/or Mark as Answer where applicable. Thanks.

PIX Users Cannot Access Other Websites & Email Servers on Same-Shared T1 Co

We are sharing a T1 connection with another business in our building. They have their own separate network environment from mine. I have a Windows 2003 Small Business Server behind a PIX-501 and the users in my network connect to the Internet via Windows Server?s DHCP and Internet sharing (NAT) services.
All Internet and email traffic is accessible except for those hosted by the other company who we're sharing a connection with. My users cannot access that company?s web server or send email to their email server (we all get 4.4.7 SMTP errors? days later after sending the message).
They have no firewall on their end; which is why I think there may be something wrong with my PIX configuration (see attached config file). I'm sort of a newbie with the PIX CLI, so any help I can get could be great. Thanks in advanced!

The problem is not with PIX. This is a common problem when sharing a T1 link as it creates a routing problem since routing cannot be done based on shared T1 channels. Your PIX config is fine and has nothing to do with this issue.

How to avoid multiple users to access same tcode

Hi all,
Am creating one z tcode to display the material details for the particular reservation number. How can I avoid multiple users to access the same tcode simultaneously. If anybody works over that tcode then no other user should be able to access the same tcode until or unless the first user works over it.
Regards,
Ramya

HI,
you can even use import and export logic and check if user has entered the transaction ..
Regards,
Santosh
Message was edited by:
Santosh Kumar Patha

BOX31 - Users cannot access InfoView

After upgrading BOXIR2 to BOX31 the users cannot access InfoView. The following message is shown:
Account Information Not Recognized: Enterprise authentication could not log you on ...
As administrator I can access OK.
What has changed between BOXIR2 and BOX31 in terms of user authentication?
Thank you in advance.

The structure of the users is as follow:
Management (at the top)
- Accounting
- Marketing
- Sales, etc
Users can then access one of the above, only one.
Universe restrictions has been applied to allow users to see information related to their department only.
We do not use any Windows AD authentication, it is just Business Objects.
Thank you.

The Windows SMB feature has file locking if multiple users are accessing the same file. Does Snow Leopard Server File Sharing (AFP) provide similar features?

The Windows SMB feature has file locking if multiple users are accessing the same file. Does File Sharing (AFP) on Snow Leopard Server provide similar services?

Were you ever able to solve this problem. I'm having similar issues since upgrading to snow leopard. Four macs connect to a Windows Server 2003 for shared files. Each user has full permissions & when we "get info" it shows read & write permissions. Two of the computers were running 10.4, two were running 10.5. Everything worked properly until upgrading to snow leopard. Some files let me copy, move, delete. Others either just hang up or we get a "no permission" error. Also getting a "pdf is in use" error, even when the file/folder doesn't contain a pdf. We had our IT rep check the server who said everything is in working order. They don't represent macs any longer but feel that it's a mac problem. I would have to agree since this problem only started after the upgrade, and the one machine that was not upgraded (still running 10.5.8) is not dealing with these problems.
Lastly, I would install 10.5 back on all of the computers if I could, but the leopard disk that came with one of the computers wouldn't work with the 2 machines running 10.4 and I didn't see it available at the apple store. I'll buy it if it's still available, but why wouldn't the disks that I have work?
Thanks for any help

Computer clock that user cannot access

I have made a game that i published on Kongregate using C# language with Unity.
I have a serious issue though. If the player stays offline, he gets some bonus in game when he returns. The more he is offline the bigger bonus. The issue is that if someone while he is offline changes the clock of his computer to 1 day or 10 years in the
future he gets so much bonus that he ruins the game.
Is there any way to avoid that without having a server to get time?
In the webplayer i cannot use NTP due to security limitations, so i am trying to find a clock that the user cannot access.
Thanks in advance for any possible answers!

The software house where I'm working as a phone app which uses a timestamp on data it sends to a server.
There are frequent issues with users messing with the time on their devices for games like candy crush.
This causes no end of problems since you get data which is sent as if it happened like yesterday or some such and bad stuff happens.
You definitely don't want to rely on the time on the users computer.
Get the time when you start up or support bonus for save to server only and apply it retrospectively.
Use a timer to see how long they play between saves if necessary.
Or change the game and ditch the bonus mechanism.
Hope that helps.
Technet articles: Uneventful MVVM;
All my Technet Articles

Is there an app or way for multiple users to access contact info?

We are a small business that maintains a contact list of leads and clients in a MS word file. We can access those word files via our iphones, but only view them. Is there an app or way to have one person in the office maintain a database of leads and clients that a few users can access via iphone and simply touch the phone number to call them or touch the address for directions/map?
We know we could each input the info in each of our phones independently, but that is dumb - given someone in the office maintains such info as part of their job and updates it weekly/monthly whatever. Do you see what I mean? I cannot believe there is nothing out there for this.
Basically we are looking for a continuously updatable, multiple user, remotely accessible, interactive contact database with name, address, and phone number. I think that is what I would call it.

I can access phone numbers directly from our client list in word.
And that solves your quest looking for "a continuously updatable, multiple user, remotely accessible, interactive contact database with name, address, and phone number"?
Wow... I never know Microsoft Word could do so much!

How control multiple users to access same page?

Hi,
I am working on a public page where the data pull from
database base on different UUID. Where this page doesn't required
login account. It differential by UUID where it send via email.
What I affaird in the email that contain UUID that might
forward to multiple users for filling in a long forms with same
UUID.
(This form it could be share same department but different
sections).
How can I lock this page or only allow accessing by a user
until been submitted?

Qoop wrote:
I tested but it cannot be lock - i open the dept_id:HR in my pc
and I open same dept_id:HR in other pc which able to view same
page.
BKBK wrote:
That is a paradox. If entry to the page cannot be locked then
the form should not appear on at least one of the PCs. Could we see
your code.
Qoop later wrote:
anyway, here is the code (simplify version)...:
<cfquery of DEPT info base on the #URL.UUID#>
<cfif DEPT recordcount EQ 0>
Missing dept info <cflocation to xxx.cfm>
<cfelse>
<cfif SUBMIT EQ 1>
TQ for submitting...
<cfelse>
code start here...
<form action= next_page_action.cfm>
</cfif>
</cfif>
I have tested my suggestion. It works.
I can see where your code is leading to. However, it does not
follow the line I suggested on 08/08/2007. Its logic is essentially
different from mine. In my code, the condition for displaying the
form is in a lock. In your code, the form is displayed
unconditionally.

[Solved] Non-root user cannot access mounted ntfs filesystem

Hi -,
i have a dualboot system (arch/xfce + win7) and i use a ntfs partition /dev/sda2 to store files i use with both operating systems. I added the partition to fstab and it gets mounted, but i cannot access it with my non-root user. With root it works fine...
My fstab:
# cat /etc/fstab
# /etc/fstab: static file system information
# <file system> <dir> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs nodev,nosuid 0 0
LABEL=home /home ext4 defaults 0 1
LABEL=root / ext4 defaults 0 1
LABEL=swap swap swap defaults 0 0
/dev/sda2 /media/sda2 ntfs defaults 0 2
Is there any option that allows all users to use the mounted device? Or how is this usually done ...
Last edited by muzzel (2012-05-30 20:39:58)

See: NTFS-3G for important setup information.
My fstab line looks like:
/dev/sdb1 /media/Win_USB ntfs-3g uid=1000,gid=users,fmask=113,dmask=0022 0 0
This sets up some important parameters which the NTFS-3G Wiki Page covers. Basically, "ntfs" is only a basic driver and is built into the kernel. "ntfs-3g" is a much better, and less disk-eating, driver that you should install and use if you need the drive in Linux any more than occasionally. My fstab line makes my user (1000) the owner and the masks lets me write and etc to it. When you install NTFS-3G it is automatically used when you use the mount command to mount NTFS drives. In fstab, as above, you would specify it explicitly.
You can find your own user number by entering "id" at a terminal.

Users cannot access calenders from outlook after migration to exchange 2013

I have a strange situation after upgrading to exchange 2013 some users are reporting that they cannot open or create calender appointments for calenders they used to be able to manage. we currently are using outlook 2010. also when the users access the calenders
with the webmail they are reporting that they can access the calenders and are able to do all the things they need to do.
i have tried reinstalling office and adding their exchange accounts but this does not help.
another stange thing is that to be sure i had setup the correct access policy i have reset all the security entries on all the calendars with the help of powershell. this seemed to have helped but after a couple of hours some users started reporting that they
could not access calendar items again!

Hi,
Is there any error description when the problematic users cannot open or create calendar items? Since the issue only happens to some users instead of all users and all calendars can work well in OWA, I think the calendar in the mailbox
should be configured properly.
Please configure the problematic user’s Outlook account in a clean computer with new installed Outlook to check whether the issue persists.
Thanks,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Multiple Users CANNOT access folders

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for